1. No category

The Open Archival Information System (OAIS) reference model provides a conceptual
framework and common terminology for the preservation and dissemination of digital assets.
It defines a set of roles, processes, and functions relevant to long-term preservation. Thus the OAIS
model provides us with a common understanding of what it is that archives do when they preserve
digital information objects. At the same time, it has also given important impulses to move towards
greater standardization in the field of digital preservation, including the development of criteria
and procedures to analyze and assess archival preservation and dissemination practice.
Where to start?
OAIS purposely uses “terms that are not already overloaded with meaning so as to reduce conveying
unintended meanings” (CCSDS, 2012, p. 1-8). As a result, OAIS language is not always intuitively
understood and it is recommended that you study the Terminology section (1-7) before diving into
the standard.
The centerpiece of the OAIS standard are two models: the functional model, which defines archival
tasks, functions, and information flows; and the information model. The information model (Section
4.2) defines the different components of the objects that an archive receives, curates, and
disseminates. Specifically, it takes a closer look at the types of information required for long-term
preservation and dissemination, including the metadata necessary to access and understand an
archived object. The model also specifies how the different types of information relate to each other
and how they are structured by way of the concept of information packages. These combinations of
content and metadata come in different forms (and are accordingly named differently) depending on
the phase of the archiving process in which they occur: there are submission information packages,
archival information packages, and dissemination information packages.
The functional model (Section 4.1; see figure) defines six “functional entities”: Ingest, Data
Management, Archival Storage, Access, which roughly describe the path that information packages
take through the archive, and Preservation Planning and Administration, which comprise planning,
management, and administrative tasks that take place in the archive across the information lifecycle.
Each functional entity is a bundle of “functions” – tasks and activities that can be fulfilled either by
human staff or by machines such as computer systems. Thus for example, the function that allows
users to query an archive’s collection could be fulfilled by a staff member, an old-fashioned card
catalog, or an online search interface.
CESSDA AS
CESSDA House
Parkveien 20
5007 Bergen
NORWAY
phone: +47 55 58 21 18
e-mail: cessda@cessda.net
www.cessda.net
Consortium of
European Social Science
Data Archives
The Open Archival Information System (OAIS)
Reference Model
Figure 1: OAIS functional model
Recommended introductory resources
Lavoie, B. (2014). The Open Archival Information System (OAIS) Reference Model: Introductory Guide (2nd
Edition) (No. 14-02). York. doi:10.7207/twr14-02
Lee, C. A. (2010). Open Archival Information System (OAIS) Reference Model. In M. J. Bates & M. N. Maack
rd
(Eds.), Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. (3 Ed., pp. 4020–4030). Taylor & Francis.
doi:10.1081/E-ELIS3-120044377
Paradigm Project. (2008). Introduction to OAIS. Retrieved July 19, 2012, from
http://www.paradigm.ac.uk/workbook/introduction/oais.html
What is it for?
The OAIS standard is not light background reading exactly, but it can be considered a “must-read” for
(aspiring) digital preservation professionals for the following reasons:
Much of the OAIS terminology has found its way into the language of the digital preservation
community. Being familiar with the terminology facilitates communication about digital
preservation strategies, processes, and workflows across archives and disciplines.
The functional model gives a detailed break-down of digital preservation and dissemination
workflows – in short, it explains how an (idealized) archive works. It therefore is a good
starting point for anyone who seeks to obtain a systematic overview of these workflows or
wants to analyze and understand workflows in an existing archive. The latter approach has
been taken by the ICPSR and the UKDA/TNA, among others, who performed a mapping of
OAIS and their archives to identify and close possible gaps (see Beedham, Missen, Palmer, &
Ruusalepp, 2005; Vardigan & Whiteman, 2007).
2
Similarly, the information model provides us with a means to better understand the objects of
our preservation efforts – again in a very systematic fashion.Like the functional model it can
serve as the basis for a mapping process in existing archives to support the identification of
possible gaps.
Complying with OAIS
Ever since the standard was first published, archives have labeled themselves as “OAIS compliant” to
emphasize their proficiency and trustworthiness. However, the standard itself makes only two, fairly
general requirements, for compliance: Supporting the information model (Section 2.2) and fulfilling
the set of mandatory responsibilities (Section 3.1; see table), which are themselves rather general.
When thinking about OAIS compliance it should be kept in mind that a reference model can – by
definition – not be implemented directly. Thus, OAIS is an abstract and highly generic
conceptualization of a preservation and dissemination environment, not so much a blueprint that we
can use to build an actual archival information system (see Schumann & Recker, 2013). Thus, the
abstract OAIS requirements need interpretation, translation, and concretization if they are to be
used for evaluation purposes. This concretization has been undertaken by initiatives creating sets of
concrete criteria to measure the trustworthiness of digital repositories, the outcome of which are
audit and certification standards such as DIN 31646 and ISO 16363.
Overall, smaller archives will find it difficult to conform fully to the OAIS reference model, with its
emphasis on administrative processes. However, it can be useful to undertake an OAIS mapping in
order to understand – and make transparent – ways in which your archive preserves and
disseminates its assets, and expose any gaps or vulnerabilities that place preservation at risk.
OAIS mandatory responsibilities (CCSDS 2012, p.
3-1)…
Negotiate for and accept appropriate information
from information Producers.
Obtain sufficient control of the information provided
to the level needed to ensure Long Term
Preservation.
Determine, either by itself or in conjunction with
other parties, which communities should become the
Designated Community and, therefore, should be
able to understand the information provided,
thereby defining its Knowledge Base.
Ensure that the information to be preserved is
Independently Understandable to the Designated
Community.
Follow documented policies and procedures which
ensure that the information is preserved against all
reasonable contingencies, including the demise of
the Archive, ensuring that it is never deleted unless
allowed as part of an approved strategy. There
should be no ad-hoc deletions.
…and what they mean
Decide what to archive. What is the scope of data
collection? What is your universe? Is it, for example,
discipline-specific, spatial, institutional, or formatbased? A set of criteria should form the basis for
negotiating with and accepting submissions from
data producers.
Establish the right to hold and preserve data. Legally,
can you disseminate that data? Are any copy
protections in place? Do you have the right to modify
the data? For example, to migrate data into a
different format in order to ensure its long-term
preservation? These issues should be addressed in
the deposit agreement / archival contract.
Define and serve your community. An archive must
know the community it serves, and what its needs
and requirements are. It is not enough to hold data
for users; archives have a responsibility to make sure
data they hold is comprehensible to those users.
Establish preservation policies and procedures.
What is your plan for long-term preservation? Which
strategies do you employ to back-up and preserve
digital assets? Are succession plans in place, for
example, to ensure that the archive’s holdings are
not lost in case it can no longer operate?
3
Make the preserved information available to the
Designated Community and enable the information
to be disseminated as copies of, or as traceable to,
the original submitted Data Objects with evidence
supporting its Authenticity.
Service. How do you get data to people? What is
your dissemination method?
References
Beedham, H., Missen, J., Palmer, M., & Ruusalepp, R. (2005). Assessment of UKDA and TNA compliance with OAIS
and METS Standards. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive, University of Essex. Retrieved from
http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/preservation/oaismets.pdf
CCSDS. (2012). Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS). Recommended Practice (No.
CCSDS 650.0-M-2). Retrieved from http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0m2.pdf
Schumann, N., & Recker, A. (2013). De-mystifying OAIS compliance: Benefits and challenges of mapping the
OAIS reference model to the GESIS Data Archive. IASSIST Quarterly, 36(2). Retrieved from
http://iassistdata.org/iq/issue/36/2
Vardigan, M., & Whiteman, C. (2007). ICPSR meets OAIS: applying the OAIS reference model to the social
science archive context. Archival Science, 7(1), 73–87. doi:10.1007/s10502-006-9037-z
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
4