Delocalized /Molecular Orbitals Delocalized Orbitals; Bonding and Antibonding MOs ● This is an alternative to the “localized orbital” model. ● Slightly more complicated – Better at explaining bonding in some molecules, especially those where antibonding orbitals are filled ➼ Very often, either model works; in such cases the easiest is often preferable. CHEM 107 T. Hughbanks Why another model? ● Localized orbital picture is clumsy or completely fails to explain some observations, for example, – Resonance structures are clumsy (a “fixup” for Lewis structures) – Some magnetic properties ● Also, localized picture is qualitative - can’t predict bond strengths, etc. Molecular orbital theory is the most common starting point for quantitative treatments of bonding. Diamagnetism of N2 vs. Paramagnetism of O2 liquid O2 O2 — “Lewis diagram” failure ● Lewis structure is simple: .. .. O .. O .. ● No unpaired electrons, no formal charges; seems to be a “good” structure ● Problem: O2 is paramagnetic (has unpaired electrons) Paramagnetism ● Magnetic properties of electrons lead to magnetic properties of molecules (just like for atoms). ● Paramagnetism implies the presence of one or more unpaired electrons. ➽ Need a improved theory of the bonding in O2 to explain its magnetism. Molecular Orbitals ● Basic premise of this model is to merge atomic orbitals to make completely new orbitals which can not be assigned to a particular atom. ● Contrast with localized orbital picture, in which an electron pair is either localized in a bond or on one atom in a lone-pair orbital. Delocalized Orbitals: H2 ● Start with simplest molecule ● Combine 1s atomic orbitals from 2 H atoms ● 2 possible combinations: Add orbitals (“in phase”). Constructive interference → “bonding orbital” Subtract orbitals (“out of phase ”). Destructive interference → “antibonding orbital” H2 : the simplest covalent bond • Bonding and antibonding sigma MO’s are formed from 1s orbitals on adjacent atoms. antibonding molecular orbital bonding molecular orbital Nature of the H-H σ bond Schematic diagram Energy antibonding orbital bonding orbital ● We can fill orbitals and write electron configurations just like for an atom. Bond Order, H2 # of Bonding electrons - # antibonding electrons 2 Energy BO = If the elecrons are all paired, BO = # of Bonding pairs - # antibonding pairs • Electrons in bonding molecular orbitals add stability. • Electrons in antibonding molecular orbitals reduce stability. ● Bond order = 1/2 (# bonding e-’s - # antibonding e-’s) ● For H2: bond order = 1 Energy He2? What happens to a H2 molecule if one of the electrons is excited to the anti-bonding orbital? Original BO = ↓ σ*1s 1s ● For He2: bond order = 0 — He2 is not stable p orbitals → σ, π orbitals ● Molecules with valence electrons in p orbitals are slightly more complicated. – Need to form both σ and π orbitals ● As in localized orbital picture, – σ orbitals from “head-on” mixing – π orbitals from “side-on” mixing ● Form bonding and antibonding orbitals ↑ σ1s excited state H2 σ*1s 1s H-atom 2−0 =1 2 1s New BO = 1− 1 =0 2 ↑↓ σ1s ground state H2 hν 1s H-atom Energy 2nd Row molecules like N2, O2, etc. Sideways overlap of atomic 2p orbitals that lie in the same direction in space give π-bonding and antibonding MOs. 2nd Row molecules like N2, O2, etc. N2? ● No unpaired electrons Energy is (1σ)2(1σ*)2(2σ)2 (π)4 ● Bond Order = 3 Energy ● Configuration ● diamagnetic (nonmagnetic) ● Lewis O2? Localized & Delocalized Orbitals ● Configuration ● Two unpaired electrons (recall Hund’s rule) diagram: ● Paramagnetic! ● 2 Energy is (1σ)2(1σ*)2(2σ)2 (π)4 (π*)2 ● Bond Order = 2 ● Lewis diagram :N≡N: Models, NOT 2 kinds of molecules ● The Lewis model is fairly simple and explains some observed properties, but is not complete enough to explain other properties (like paramagnetism of O2). Examples ● What are the bond orders and number of unpaired electrons in F2? O2– ? NO ? Energy 2nd Row molecules like N2, O2, etc. An Old Exam Question ● The ionization energy (IE) of O2 is smaller than the ionization energy of atomic oxygen (1314 kJ/mol vs. 1503 kJ/mol). The IE for N2 is larger than the ionization energy of atomic nitrogen (1503 kJ/mol vs. 1402 kJ/mol). ● Explain the difference between these two cases using the electron configurations (and MO diagrams) for the diatomic molecules. ● Hint: Compare the nature of the electrons lost for atoms vs molecules in both cases!
© Copyright 2024