Tesla Motors, Inc.

Tesla Motors, Inc. TSLA (XNAS) 
Last Price
Fair Value Estimate
Price/Fair Value
Dividend Yield %
Uncertainty
Economic Moat
Market Cap (Bil)
Stewardship
Industry Group
USD225.40
03 april 2014
USD174.28
1.29
—
03 april 2014
High
Narrow
USD27.77
03 april 2014
—
Auto Manufacturers
Tesla Issues $1.6 Billion in Convertible Notes
to Finance Gigafactory, Vehicle Production
Investment Thesis
Analyst Note
Rodney Nelson, 27 February 2014
Tesla Motors announced a $1.6 billion convertible note offering to help the company
finance the construction of its $4 billion-$5 billion battery production factory. It will
invest $2 billion in the factory through 2020, with unidentified partners absorbing the
Rodney Nelson, 02 January 2014
balance of the cost. The company will also use some of the proceeds to aid in
development and production of its mass market Model E third-generation vehicle.
Tesla Motors is at the forefront of the electric vehicle (EV) revolution, and while the
While we continue to believe Tesla is without a competitive advantage, the successful
company has enjoyed tremendous success with its first mass-market luxury vehicle,
ramping of this factory would help ensure Tesla’s longevity in the auto industry.
the Model S, the development of the EV market is only in the early innings. Tesla must
overcome a number of hurdles in the near to intermediate term, including a wave of EV
The gigafactory should significantly ease Tesla’s supply issues and costs, as the
competition from the major automakers beginning in 2014, but we think the company is
company believes the factory will produce enough battery power (roughly 35
building a solid foundation for long-term success.
GWh/year) to meet management’s 2020 expected volume of 500,000 vehicles per
year. If Tesla is to succeed in making an affordable electric car for the mass market,
Tesla’s vehicles have evolved from a toy for the wealthy in the limited-edition Roadster
this factory’s development and efficiency will be vital to that cause.
to a practical, relatively affordable luxury vehicle in the Model S. The accolades the
Model S has received have helped frame the Tesla brand as one of high quality and
In our view, the construction and ramp-up timeline looks tight, yet feasible, relative to
cutting-edge technology, a factor that could entice the average consumer to purchase
the Model E’s projected launch date in 2017. The firm plans to have construction
Tesla’s mass-market Model E, which will sell in the $30,000 range. However, that
complete by FYE 2015, with production ramping in early 2017. Tesla’s proposed
model remains several years off, and Tesla will first attempt to enter the fiercely
pricing for the Model E is contingent on the gigafactory’s operation, and any setbacks
competitive SUV market with its Model X crossover sometime in late 2014 or early
could hinder either the launch or Tesla’s pricing structure. While Tesla continues to
2015. While auto demand is recovering and should aid the success of the Model X, the
take the appropriate steps to making mass-market electric vehicles a reality, we think
relative youth of Tesla will make any economic declines difficult to endure relative to its
the market’s fervor for the shares has reached exceptional levels. Tesla has made
competitors. The firm remains in a heavy investment phase between development of
incredible progress as an auto developer, but it now faces new challenges as it enters
the Model E, increasing production of the Model S and ramping up production of the
the battery manufacturing industry. There has been speculation that this factory could
Model X, and building out its Supercharger Network. Additionally, Tesla has yet to
lead to new business opportunities, but we think those beliefs are premature. We
prove that it can produce electric vehicles profitably, and the company will need to
continue to believe Tesla shares are priced to perfection, and an investment in the
continue to refine its technology and operations in order to efficiently build higher-
shares at these levels assumes the company will maintain flawless execution moving
volume models.
forward.
We think the Supercharger Network could be a disruptor for Tesla that could give its
Bulls Say
models a leg up on competing EVs. Tesla models will be able to use the network for
free, and drivers can achieve a full charge in under an hour, much faster than standard
chargers in parking garages or gas stations. However, we worry that the free-use
model could become a significant cost burden as Tesla vehicles become more
prevalent on the road, and the North American network is still at least two years from
completion.
 Tesla is attempting to expand EV infrastructure with its Supercharger Networks in
North America and Europe, which could give its vehicles an edge over new EV
competition. These networks could also ease consumers' anxiety about range
limitations of electric vehicles.
 The accolades Tesla has received for its Model S could build some staying power
for the brand as the firm moves into the SUV and high-volume markets.
© 2013 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved. Unless otherwise provided in a separate agreement, you may use this report only in the country in which its original distributor is based. Data as originally reported.
The information contained herein is not represented or warranted to be accurate, correct, complete, or timely. This report is for information purposes only, and should not be considered a solicitation to buy or sell any security.
Redistribution is prohibited without written permission. To order reprints, call +1 312-696-6100. To license the research, call +1 312-696-6869.
MeDirect - Keizerinlaan 66 Boulevard de l’Impératrice - 1000 Brussels - Belgium
Contact - Tel: 02 518 0000 - www.medirectbank.be - info@medirectbank.be
MeDirect is the trade name under which Mediterranean Bank (Malta) plc (BTW /TVA: BE 0843.062.632) operates in Belgium.
Mediterranean Bank (Malta) plc is a branch of Mediterranean Bank plc.
Tesla Motors, Inc. TSLA (XNAS) 
Last Price
Fair Value Estimate
Price/Fair Value
Dividend Yield %
Uncertainty
Economic Moat
Market Cap (Bil)
Stewardship
Industry Group
USD225.40
03 april 2014
USD174.28
1.29
—
03 april 2014
High
Narrow
USD27.77
03 april 2014
—
Auto Manufacturers
 Tesla has already made inroads in Europe and Asia with its Model S, which could
expensive Model E. While annual revenues have skyrocketed north of $1 billion since
give the firm a leg up on larger manufacturers as EVs become more prevalent
the introduction of the Model S in late 2012, the firm has struggled with cost control and
worldwide.
has yet to prove that EV production is profitable, though selling, general, and
administrative expenses appear to be stabilizing in the midteens as a percentage of
Bears Say
sales. The firm has ramped annual production of the Model S to more than 21,000, and
the company anticipates production doubling in 2014. Currently, Tesla has production
 The infrastructure for electric vehicles remains insufficient in most countries.
capabilities of up to 500,000 vehicles at its Fremont, Calif., plant, though the firm will
Furthermore, Tesla is making its Supercharger stations available for free use, which
likely explore overseas production as new models are brought to market.Management
we fear could become a significant cost burden.
has targeted automotive gross margins of 25%, and the company is within striking
 Early electric vehicle entries into the highvolume market, such as the Chevy Volt,
have struggled to succeed, which could keep Tesla’s Model X from gaining traction.
 The firm has butted heads with franchised auto dealers and faces regulatory
pressures from individual states that could cause an overhaul of Tesla’s bricks-andmortar sales network structure.
Economic Moat 02 January 2014
Although Tesla has innovated the auto industry with the success of its Model S, we
believe the firm is without a competitive advantage. It is incredibly difficult for an auto
manufacturer to develop a competitive advantage, based on the dearth of switching
costs and falling barriers to entry in the industry. While some manufacturers command
some brand loyalty, we do not believe this would translate into any significant level of
distance of achieving that rate consistently. Supply constraints and Tesla’s
inexperience have hampered profitability, but further manufacturing experience and a
deeper penetration of the EV into the general auto market should ease the pressure on
Tesla’s negative operating and net margins. While the Model S and Model X have the
potential to generate double-digit profit margins that are realized in a number of luxury
and sport utility vehicles, the margin outlook for electric vehicles remains a relative
unknown. As more electric vehicles enter the market from major manufacturers,
suppliers will likely ramp parts production and ease Tesla’s constraints. Still, we believe
the firm’s high-volume Model E (likely priced between $30,000 and $40,000 with first
deliveries in the latter half of the decade) is unlikely to generate operating margins
beyond the midsingle digits, a common rate for volume vehicles.
Risk 02 January 2014
protection for the firm’s economic profits over the long term. While Tesla is not an
ordinary auto manufacturer, we believe the firm remains without any significant
competitive advantages in the auto manufacturing space. The firm has been able to
generate success by marketing its Model S as a luxury vehicle, and the product has
garnered enough accolades to justify the distinction. However, Tesla’s long-term
feasibility depends on its ability to profitably manufacture a lineup of volume vehicles to
help propagate the penetration of electric vehicles into a market and infrastructure that
is designed for internal combustion engines. To this effect, Tesla’s Supercharger
Network remains a relative wild card and could generate some level of consumer
switching costs among electric car options should the network buildout prove to be
successful. However, the project remains in the early innings, and significant capital
outlays will be required to complete the balance of the proposed 225-station North
American network by the end of 2015 in addition to a European network slated for
completion by the end of 2014.
Valuation 02 January 2014
Tesla’s growth story is contingent on the firm continuing to improve the cost of
production of its electric vehicles in order to serve the broader market with its less-
Tesla faces a number of considerable headwinds as it attempts to usher in the electric
vehicle era. The firm has been locked in a regulatory debate with franchised car
dealerships and individual states over whether Tesla should be allowed to sell its cars
via factory-owned dealerships in those states, serving as a potential roadblock to
growing sales. The company has also experienced some negative publicity following a
series of fires resulting from Model S crashes, and further incidents such as these
could necessitate a design change or potentially catastrophic product recalls. Tesla will
also require significant capital outlays to both build out its North American
Supercharger Network and to efficiently manufacture and deliver vehicles to
international markets. The firm is also set to encounter significant competition both in
the luxury and high-volume market, as several manufacturers will unveil electric
vehicles in the coming years, including Cadillac’s ELR which enters production in 2014,
though it is not a pure EV. The company has also faced supply issues as some parts
that are paramount to the EV model can only be sourced from a small number of
suppliers, and this could lead to production issues if the company cannot find
alternative suppliers. The company also risks suffering from gaps in new product
launches, as the Model X will likely lag the Model S launch by three to four years, while
the Model E introduction could face a similar delay. These gaps could harm sales
© 2013 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved. Unless otherwise provided in a separate agreement, you may use this report only in the country in which its original distributor is based. Data as originally reported.
The information contained herein is not represented or warranted to be accurate, correct, complete, or timely. This report is for information purposes only, and should not be considered a solicitation to buy or sell any security.
Redistribution is prohibited without written permission. To order reprints, call +1 312-696-6100. To license the research, call +1 312-696-6869.
MeDirect - Keizerinlaan 66 Boulevard de l’Impératrice - 1000 Brussels - Belgium
Contact - Tel: 02 518 0000 - www.medirectbank.be - info@medirectbank.be
MeDirect is the trade name under which Mediterranean Bank (Malta) plc (BTW /TVA: BE 0843.062.632) operates in Belgium.
Mediterranean Bank (Malta) plc is a branch of Mediterranean Bank plc.
Tesla Motors, Inc. TSLA (XNAS) 
Last Price
Fair Value Estimate
Price/Fair Value
Dividend Yield %
Uncertainty
Economic Moat
Market Cap (Bil)
Stewardship
Industry Group
USD225.40
03 april 2014
USD174.28
1.29
—
03 april 2014
High
Narrow
USD27.77
03 april 2014
—
Auto Manufacturers
momentum for Tesla, which will be imperative if the EV is to become a mainstay in the
auto market.
Management Rodney Nelson, 02 January 2014
Tesla is led by CEO Elon Musk, who was instrumental in co-founding the company in
2003. In addition to his exploits at Tesla, Musk is also the chairman of SolarCity and
CEO of Space X, and he was also responsible for the rise of PayPal in the early 2000s.
Musk has overseen the development of Tesla’s two production vehicles, the Tesla
Roadster and the Model S. We anticipate Musk’s influence will continue to be pivotal in
the long-term future of Tesla as he actively pursues the widespread adoption of electric
vehicles. While we harbor some concern that his responsibilities at other firms could
affect his ability to lead Tesla at some point, Musk remains heavily invested in the
firm’s future with an ownership stake of just over 20%, and we believe his leadership is
paramount to Tesla’s success. Daimler and Toyota also hold significant stakes in
Tesla, totaling roughly 10% and 5% of the firm’s float, respectively. We think
management has exhibited sound capital decision-making, and the company has
managed its debt levels well, most notably after Tesla paid off its $465 million loan
from the U.S. Department of Energy nine years early. The company is not only
investing in electric vehicle technology but also infrastructure to promote the advance
of the EV on a global scale, with significant investment in battery technology and the
firm’s Supercharger Networks in North America and Europe.
© 2013 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved. Unless otherwise provided in a separate agreement, you may use this report only in the country in which its original distributor is based. Data as originally reported.
The information contained herein is not represented or warranted to be accurate, correct, complete, or timely. This report is for information purposes only, and should not be considered a solicitation to buy or sell any security.
Redistribution is prohibited without written permission. To order reprints, call +1 312-696-6100. To license the research, call +1 312-696-6869.
MeDirect - Keizerinlaan 66 Boulevard de l’Impératrice - 1000 Brussels - Belgium
Contact - Tel: 02 518 0000 - www.medirectbank.be - info@medirectbank.be
MeDirect is the trade name under which Mediterranean Bank (Malta) plc (BTW /TVA: BE 0843.062.632) operates in Belgium.
Mediterranean Bank (Malta) plc is a branch of Mediterranean Bank plc.
Tesla Motors, Inc. TSLA (XNAS) 
Last Price
Fair Value Estimate
Price/Fair Value
Dividend Yield %
Uncertainty
Economic Moat
Market Cap (Bil)
Stewardship
Industry Group
USD225.40
03 april 2014
USD174.28
1.29
—
03 april 2014
High
Narrow
USD27.77
03 april 2014
—
Auto Manufacturers
Analyst Notes Archive
"gigafactory." We believe Tesla's brand continues to gain traction with consumers on
an international scale, but we think the dearth of switching costs in the auto industry
Tesla Issues $1.6 Billion in Convertible Notes to Finance Gigafactory, Vehicle
continues as an impediment to Tesla's claims to any material competitive advantage.
Production Rodney Nelson, 27 February 2014
Fourth-quarter adjusted revenue ($761.3 million) and adjusted earnings per share
Tesla Motors announced a $1.6 billion convertible note offering to help the company
($0.33) came in well ahead of consensus estimates of $677 million and $0.21,
finance the construction of its $4 billion-$5 billion battery production factory. It will
respectively. The firm surpassed its automotive gross margin target of 25% in the
invest $2 billion in the factory through 2020, with unidentified partners absorbing the
fourth quarter as CEO Elon Musk noted improvements in labor efficiency continue to
balance of the cost. The company will also use some of the proceeds to aid in
pay dividends. Continuing these gains will be crucial as the company will assemble the
development and production of its mass market Model E third-generation vehicle.
Model X on the same production line as the Model S. Management anticipates total
While we continue to believe Tesla is without a competitive advantage, the successful
vehicle deliveries will reach 35,000 in 2014, representing 50% increase over 2013's
ramping of this factory would help ensure Tesla’s longevity in the auto industry.
The gigafactory should significantly ease Tesla’s supply issues and costs, as the
company believes the factory will produce enough battery power (roughly 35
total.
The gigafactory should significantly ease battery pack costs and supply constraints,
which could greatly improve profitability for Tesla, though we have some concerns over
GWh/year) to meet management’s 2020 expected volume of 500,000 vehicles per
management's long-term midteens operating margin target. Musk has intimated that
year. If Tesla is to succeed in making an affordable electric car for the mass market,
Tesla will sacrifice premium prices for brand loyalty, which could limit the firm's ability
this factory’s development and efficiency will be vital to that cause.
to reach these levels. The firm is also undertaking significant increases in capital
expenditures in 2014 to prepare for mass Model X deliveries in early 2015. Though we
In our view, the construction and ramp-up timeline looks tight, yet feasible, relative to
the Model E’s projected launch date in 2017. The firm plans to have construction
complete by FYE 2015, with production ramping in early 2017. Tesla’s proposed
think Tesla continues to lay the foundation for a secular transition to electric vehicles,
shares are trading at a level that assumes flawless execution through the Model X
launch and Model E development.
pricing for the Model E is contingent on the gigafactory’s operation, and any setbacks
could hinder either the launch or Tesla’s pricing structure. While Tesla continues to
Extension of Electric-Vehicle Subsidy in China Is Bullish for Tesla, but Shares
take the appropriate steps to making mass-market electric vehicles a reality, we think
Still Rich Rodney Nelson, 10 February 2014
the market’s fervor for the shares has reached exceptional levels. Tesla has made
incredible progress as an auto developer, but it now faces new challenges as it enters
As China continues to wage war against its spiraling pollution problems, regulators
the battery manufacturing industry. There has been speculation that this factory could
announced the extension of its electric-vehicle subsidy through the end of 2015.
lead to new business opportunities, but we think those beliefs are premature. We
Subsidies will decrease just 5% and 10% versus the original 10% and 20% over the
continue to believe Tesla shares are priced to perfection, and an investment in the
course of 2014 and 2015, respectively. The extension is incredibly timely for Tesla,
shares at these levels assumes the company will maintain flawless execution moving
whose Model S vehicles will debut in the country shortly at a price tag of roughly
forward.
$120,000. While this represents a markup of roughly 50% versus U.S. retail prices, the
majority of the price hike incorporates excess taxes and transport fees. Still, we think
Tesla Sets Sights on Margin Expansion, Model X Prep in 2014; Shares Priced to
Perfection Rodney Nelson, 20 February 2014
the extension of the subsidy should help to stimulate electric-vehicle demand in the
region. While we view this development as a positive near-term catalyst, we think the
market has priced in a substantial amount of upside in Tesla shares on the back of
After a groundbreaking 2013, Tesla will probably face increased scrutiny over
execution as it readies to introduce its second mainstream vehicle. Management has
set lofty yet attainable goals for the year, including vehicle gross margin expansion to
28%, increased capital expenditures to begin deliveries in China, ramping up Model X
better-than-consensus sales figures announced last month in conjunction with the
subsidy development, and the firm remains without a competitive advantage in the
hotly contested auto industry, though we acknowledge the firm is making headway in
growing its brand power.
production, and easing pressures on battery pack supplies and costs at its forthcoming
© 2013 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved. Unless otherwise provided in a separate agreement, you may use this report only in the country in which its original distributor is based. Data as originally reported.
The information contained herein is not represented or warranted to be accurate, correct, complete, or timely. This report is for information purposes only, and should not be considered a solicitation to buy or sell any security.
Redistribution is prohibited without written permission. To order reprints, call +1 312-696-6100. To license the research, call +1 312-696-6869.
MeDirect - Keizerinlaan 66 Boulevard de l’Impératrice - 1000 Brussels - Belgium
Contact - Tel: 02 518 0000 - www.medirectbank.be - info@medirectbank.be
MeDirect is the trade name under which Mediterranean Bank (Malta) plc (BTW /TVA: BE 0843.062.632) operates in Belgium.
Mediterranean Bank (Malta) plc is a branch of Mediterranean Bank plc.
Tesla Motors, Inc. TSLA (XNAS) 
Last Price
Fair Value Estimate
Price/Fair Value
Dividend Yield %
Uncertainty
Economic Moat
Market Cap (Bil)
Stewardship
Industry Group
USD225.40
03 april 2014
USD174.28
1.29
—
03 april 2014
High
Narrow
USD27.77
03 april 2014
—
Auto Manufacturers
CEO Elon Musk has expressed cautious optimism over Tesla’s business opportunity in
China, suggesting demand could reach similar levels seen in the U.S. as early as
2015. Given the success of the Tesla brand and its association with high quality in the
United States, we certainly believe this is a possibility, and early reports have indicated
that Chinese consumers hold the company in similar regard. Although Tesla is forgoing
the significant markup that other foreign manufacturers implement (certain models from
Mercedes, BMW, and others have been marked up 100% or more in China), we think
this will better position the firm in the eyes of consumers if and when it chooses to bring
its Model X and high-volume Model E to market over the next several years. Musk has
also expressed interest in opening a production facility in China, though no formal
plans have been developed.
Model S Sales Surge for Tesla in Fourth Quarter; Company Announces Charger
Fix Rodney Nelson 14 January 2014
Tesla Motors issued a statement outlining a fix for the software and hardware
surrounding the firm’s in-home charging station, while the firm also announced that
revenue would exceed management’s expectations by nearly 20% after the company
delivered a record 6,900 Model S units in the quarter. We are encouraged by these
developments as Tesla continues to show improving execution in manufacturing and
delivering its vehicles, though we continue to believe that the firm is without a
competitive advantage given the dearth of switching costs in the auto industry.
The first release addresses recent reports of fires occurring in the garages of Model S
owners as a result of faulty charging units. Though these reports have been sporadic
and minimal in number, Tesla is issuing a software update that can reduce charging
current if fluctuations in power to the vehicle from the charger, which should eradicate
the problem. The firm is also offering an improved wall adapter to Model S owners free
of charge to ensure maximum safety precautions have been taken. We view these as
prudent steps to help eliminate any concerns that the Model S or its charging
mechanisms are unsafe, which should help promote the viability of electric vehicles
over the long term.
The number of Model S deliveries is a tremendous achievement for the firm and puts
Tesla on pace for more than 22,000 deliveries in its first full year of sales. The sales
figures suggest that Tesla’s vehicles are sustaining, if not improving, momentum that
should help the firm bridge the product gap between the Model S and Model X launch
sometime in late 2014 or early 2015. The release also noted improving parts
availability, most notably from battery supplier Panasonic, which helps ease some of
our concerns over supply strain. Although we think this is yet another step in the right
direction, Tesla’s shares appear rich after today’s 21% rally, and investors should wait
for a better entry before putting new capital to work.
© 2013 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved. Unless otherwise provided in a separate agreement, you may use this report only in the country in which its original distributor is based. Data as originally reported.
The information contained herein is not represented or warranted to be accurate, correct, complete, or timely. This report is for information purposes only, and should not be considered a solicitation to buy or sell any security.
Redistribution is prohibited without written permission. To order reprints, call +1 312-696-6100. To license the research, call +1 312-696-6869.
MeDirect - Keizerinlaan 66 Boulevard de l’Impératrice - 1000 Brussels - Belgium
Contact - Tel: 02 518 0000 - www.medirectbank.be - info@medirectbank.be
MeDirect is the trade name under which Mediterranean Bank (Malta) plc (BTW /TVA: BE 0843.062.632) operates in Belgium.
Mediterranean Bank (Malta) plc is a branch of Mediterranean Bank plc.
LITE PICTURE
© 2013 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved. Unless otherwise provided in a separate agreement, you may use this report only in t he country in which its original distributor is based. Data as originally reported.
The information contained herein is not represented or warranted to be accurate, correct, complete, or timely. This report is for information purposes only, and shou ld not be considered a solicitation to buy or sell any security.
Redistribution is prohibited without written permission. To order reprints, call +1 312-696-6100. To license the research, call +1 312-696-6869.
MeDirect - Keizerinlaan 66 Boulevard de l’Impératrice - 1000 Brussels - Belgium
Contact - Tel: 02 518 0000 - www.medirectbank.be - info@medirectbank.be
MeDirect is the trade name under which Mediterranean Bank (Malta) plc (BTW /TVA: BE 0843.062.632) operates in Belgium.
Mediterranean Bank (Malta) plc is a branch of Mediterranean Bank plc.
Morningstar Equity & Credit Research Methodology
Fundamental Analysis
Economic Moat
At Morningstar, we believe buying shares of superior businesses at a discount and
The economic moat concept is a cornerstone of Morningstar’s investment philosophy
allowing them to compound over time is the surest way to create wealth in the stock
and is used to distinguish high-quality companies with sustainable competitive
market. The long-term fundamentals of businesses, such as cash flow, competition,
advantages. An economic moat is a structural feature that allows a firm to sustain
economic cycles, and stewardship, are our primary focus. Occasionally, this approach
excess returns over a long period of time. Without a moat, a company’s profits are more
causes our recommendations to appear out of step with the market, but willingness to be
susceptible to competition. Companies with narrow moats are likely to achieve
contrarian is an important source of outperformance and a benefit of Morningstar’s
normalized excess returns beyond 10 years while wide-moat companies are likely to
independence. Our analysts conduct primary research to inform our views on each firm’s
sustain excess returns beyond 20 years. The longer a firm generates economic profits,
moat, fair value and uncertainty.
the higher its intrinsic value. We believe lower-quality no-moat companies will see their
returns gravitate toward the firm’s cost of capital more quickly than companies with
moats will. We have identified five sources of economic moats: intangible assets,
switching costs, network effect, cost advantage, and efficient scale.
© 2013 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved. Unless otherwise provided in a separate agreement, you may use this report only in t he country in which its original distributor is based. Data as originally reported.
The information contained herein is not represented or warranted to be accurate, correct, complete, or timely. This report is for information purposes only, and should not be considered a solicitation to buy or sell any security.
Redistribution is prohibited without written permission. To order reprints, call +1 312-696-6100. To license the research, call +1 312-696-6869.
MeDirect - Keizerinlaan 66 Boulevard de l’Impératrice - 1000 Brussels - Belgium
Contact - Tel: 02 518 0000 - www.medirectbank.be - info@medirectbank.be
MeDirect is the trade name under which Mediterranean Bank (Malta) plc (BTW /TVA: BE 0843.062.632) operates in Belgium.
Mediterranean Bank (Malta) plc is a branch of Mediterranean Bank plc.
Morningstar Equity & Credit Research Methodology
Fair Value Estimate
Credit Rating
Our analyst-driven fair value estimate is based primarily on Morningstar’s proprietary three-
The Morningstar Corporate Credit Rating measures the ability of a firm to satisfy its debt
stage discounted cash flow model. We also use a variety of supplementary fundamental
and debtlike obligations. The higher the rating, the less likely we think the company is to
methods to triangulate a company’s worth, such as sum-of-the-parts, multiples, and yields,
default on these obligations.
among others.
Quantitatively Driven Valuations
We’re looking well beyond next quarter to determine the cash-generating ability of a
company’s assets because we believe the market price of a security will migrate toward
To complement our analysts’ work, we produce Quantitative Ratings for a much larger
the firm’s intrinsic value over time. Economic moats are not only an important sorting
universe of companies. These ratings are generated by statistical models that are meant
mechanism for quality in our framework, but the designation also directly contributes to our
to divine the relationships between Morningstar’s analyst-driven ratings and key financial
estimate of a company’s intrinsic value through sustained excess returns on invested
data points. Consequently, our quantitative ratings are directly analogous to our analyst-
capital.
driven ratings.
Uncertainty Rating
Quantitative Fair Value Estimate (QFVE): The QFVE is analogous to Morningstar’s fair
value estimate for stocks. It represents the per-share value of the equity of a company.
The Morningstar Uncertainty Rating demonstrates our assessment of a firm’s cash flow
The QFVE is displayed in the same currency as the company’s last close price.
predictability, or valuation risk. From this rating, we determine appropriate margins of
safety: The higher the uncertainty, the wider the margin of safety around our fair value
Valuation: The valuation is based on the ratio of a company’s quantitative fair value
estimate before our recommendations are triggered. Our uncertainty ratings are low,
estimate to its last close price. Quantitative Uncertainty: This rating describes our level
medium, high, very high, and extreme.
of uncertainty about the accuracy of our quantitative fair value estimate. In this way it is
analogous to Morningstar’s fair value uncertainty ratings. Quantitative Economic Moat:
With each uncertainty rating is a corresponding set of price/fair value ratios that drive our
The quantitative moat rating is analogous to Morningstar’s analyst-driven economic
recommendations: Lower price/fair value ratios (<1.0) lead to positive recommendations,
moat rating in that both are meant to describe the strength of a firm’s competitive
while higher price/fair value ratios (>1.0) lead to negative recommendations. In very rare
position. Financial Health: Financial health is based on Morningstar’s proprietary
cases, the fair value estimate for a firm is so unpredictable that a margin of safety cannot
Distance to Default calculation.
be properly estimated. For these firms, we use a rating of extreme. Very high and extreme
uncertainty companies tend to have higher risk and volatility.
© 2013 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved. Unless otherwise provided in a separate agreement, you may use this report only in t he country in which its original distributor is based. Data as originally reported.
The information contained herein is not represented or warranted to be accurate, correct, complete, or timely. This report is for information purposes only, and should not be considered a solicitation to buy or sell any security.
Redistribution is prohibited without written permission. To order reprints, call +1 312-696-6100. To license the research, call +1 312-696-6869.
MeDirect - Keizerinlaan 66 Boulevard de l’Impératrice - 1000 Brussels - Belgium
Contact - Tel: 02 518 0000 - www.medirectbank.be - info@medirectbank.be
MeDirect is the trade name under which Mediterranean Bank (Malta) plc (BTW /TVA: BE 0843.062.632) operates in Belgium.
Mediterranean Bank (Malta) plc is a branch of Mediterranean Bank plc.
Morningstar Equity & Credit Research Methodology
Understanding Differences Between Analyst and Quantitative Valuations
If our analyst-driven ratings did not sometimes differ from our quantitative ratings, there
would be little value in producing both. Differences occur because our quantitative ratings
are essentially a highly sophisticated analysis of the analyst-driven ratings of comparable
companies. If a company is unique and has few comparable companies, the quantitative
model will have more trouble assigning correct ratings, while an analyst will have an easier
time recognizing the true characteristics of the company. On the other hand, the
quantitative models incorporate new data efficiently and consistently. Empirically, we find
quantitative ratings and analyst-driven ratings to be equally powerful predictors of future
performance. When the analyst driven rating and the quantitative rating agree, we find the
ratings to be much more predictive than when they differ. In this way, they provide an
excellent second opinion for each other. When the ratings differ, it may be wise to follow
the analyst’s rating for a truly unique company with its own special situation, and follow the
quantitative rating when a company has several reasonable comparable companies and
relevant information is flowing at a rapid pace.
© 2013 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved. Unless otherwise provided in a separate agreement, you may use this report only in t he country in which its original distributor is based. Data as originally reported.
The information contained herein is not represented or warranted to be accurate, correct, complete, or timely. This report is for information purposes only, and should not be considered a solicitation to buy or sell any security.
Redistribution is prohibited without written permission. To order reprints, call +1 312-696-6100. To license the research, call +1 312-696-6869.
MeDirect - Keizerinlaan 66 Boulevard de l’Impératrice - 1000 Brussels - Belgium
Contact - Tel: 02 518 0000 - www.medirectbank.be - info@medirectbank.be
MeDirect is the trade name under which Mediterranean Bank (Malta) plc (BTW /TVA: BE 0843.062.632) operates in Belgium.
Mediterranean Bank (Malta) plc is a branch of Mediterranean Bank plc.