Moscow, March 19th, 2015 Future Vision in Oncology Wieland Voigt, MD Ass. Professor Answers for life. Page 1 March 2015 Restricted © Siemens AG 2015. All rights reserved Aging population and addictions in Russia as driver for growing incidence of diseases such as cancer • • Increased life expectancy Growing incidence of diseases which come with age such as Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Cancer # 2 cause of death in Russia 2014 Ratio of the 65+ to the 15 to 64 population (%) 4/8/15 Cardiovascular disease Cancer Dementia Joint diseases …… 4/8/15 4/8/15 Sources: United Nations, 2010 Revision of the World Population Prospects; „Cancer will become the leading cause of death in the United States by 2030“ Clifford A. Hudis, MD, FACP 2014 Page 2 March 2015 • • 4% 4/8/15 4/8/15 Source: Goss P. et al. Lancet15: 489-37,2014 Russia is world leader in smoking with 43.9 Mio smokers (31% of population) in 2010 52 % of death in ages 15-54 are attributed to alcohol Restricted © Siemens AG 2015. All rights reserved Cancer incidence and mortality in Russia Cancer incidence prediction 2012 → Cancer Type 20122035 Breast Cancer 57502 → 60891 Colorectal Cancer 59928 → 67643 Prostate Cancer 26885 → 31072 Lung Cancer 55805 → 61127 Stomach Cancer 38417 → 42973 Cervix Cancer 15342 → 14700 Uterus Cancer 20972 → 22325 2035 Cancer incidence and mortality in Russia Source: Globocan 2012 Page 3 March 2015 Restricted © Siemens AG 2015. All rights reserved Performance indicators of the Russian healthcare system • Mortality to incidence ratio in Russia ~ 0.64 compared to 0.44 in Germany Life expectancy over time (men) 79 74 64 • • • • Stagnating life expectancy over time compared to significant increases in other major countries Lacking availability of quality healthcare even in metropolitan areas with often outdated medical facilities and equipment Low number of clinical trials in progress for cancer indicating low innovative capacity Poor access to healthcare for general population due to v v v v Underfinancing of healthcare and growing percentage of private expenditures Understaffing in several areas Increasing inefficiency of health care operations Lack of access to affordable drugs 50 64 63 68 76 67 47 Life expectancy 1965 (years) Life expectancy 2011(years) 4/8/15 4/8/15 4/8/15 4/8/15 4/8/15 Survey result amongst Moscow citizens Percentage of respondents answering „good“ Availability of quality healthcare Having areas to go at night that are safe and fun Moscow as a tourist destination Beauty or physical setting Availability of cultural opportunities such as theater, museum and music Source: gallup.com “Soul of the City survey in Moscow” Page 4 March 2015 Restricted © Siemens AG 2015. All rights reserved Screening programs – an opportunity to impact on cancer related mortality in Russia Screening in Germany1 and the USA2 • • Screening in the Russian Federation3 Screening for 5 cancer types is paid for by the insurances: • Breast cancer (Physical exam and Mammography) • Cervical cancer (PAP-Test) • Prostate cancer (Physical exam) • Skin cancer (Skin inspection) • Colon cancer (Colonoscopy) • • • No nationwide screening programs in place, recommendation to screen for Breast and Prostate cancer A few local projects on Breast cancer screening, participation in rural areas is low National Priority Project Health focuses on disease prevention with an aim to reduce cancer mortality, individual cancer screening at regular physical check ups In the USA screening for Lung cancer (Low-dose CT) is recommended for high-risk patients > 55 years old Recommendations and Reasons Breast cancer stage distribution3 • 4/8/15 4/8/15 4/8/15 4/8/15 4/8/15 4/8/15 4/8/15 4/8/15 • 4/8/15 4/8/15 • 4/8/15 Implementing local (Moscow) or national screening programs for major cancer types such as Breast Cancer, Colon Cancer, Lung Cancer etc. Screening helps detecting the cancer in early stages where curative treatment is possible and costs for treatment are lower Screening programs lower the mortality rate of cancer patients 4/8/15 1 Deutsche Krebshilfe 2 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force 3 Challenges to eff ective cancer control in China, India and Russia, Lancet Oncol. 2014 Apr;15(5):489-538. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70029-4 Page 5 March 2015 Restricted © Siemens AG 2015. All rights reserved Improved outcomes due to innovations in cancer care Cancer survival trends by cancer type in UK • • Improved overall 5 year survival in several major cancer types such as breast cancer or prostate cancer – cancer as a chronic disease ? Improvements can be attributed to implementation of Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Page 6 early detection/Screening Introduction of new classes of anticancer drugs such as TKIs or Immunotherapies advances in applications of radiation oncology minimal invasive therapies advanced imaging and molecular diagnostics modern supportive therapy to control side effects of therapy centralization and specialization e.g. therapy in cancer centers/multidisciplinary care improved access to therapy Education programs e.g. by Cancer Societies March 2015 Source: cruk.org/cancerstrats 2014 Restricted © Siemens AG 2015. All rights reserved Economical burden of cancer care is rising dramatically Mean Cost of Primary Radiation Therapy Main cost drivers • • • • Growing cancer incidence and increased cancer survival Increased number of highly expensive targeted drugs Introduction of new treatment technologies Growing usage of advanced diagnostics Source: Nguyen P. et al. JCO 29: 1517-24, 2011 Increase in Healthcare spending in the US Cost change, chemotherapy regimen for mCRC* Immunotherapy MABs TKIs * mCRC: metastatic colorectal cancer Page 7 March 2015 Restricted © Siemens AG 2015. All rights reserved Certification and standardization to improve care quality and efficiency As of today …. Inappropriate deviations from standards of care for cancer cost more than $ 25,000 per patient 1 in 4 cancer patients have treatment plans that do not conform to evidence-based cancer care Source: Poster presented at 2013 ASCO annual meeting, Chicago, 2013 …. need for • • • Certification Standardization and process optimization Improved care quality and efficiency Standardization & Benchmarking Value based care approaches Benchmarking ± Source: Voigt et al. PlosOne, 2014 Page 8 March 2015 Restricted © Siemens AG 2015. All rights reserved Molecular diagnostic & imaging as companion for modern targeted therapy Lung Cancer CS IIIB Therapy A Therapy B Therapy C Conventional Chemotherapy Detailed tumor characterization on anatomical, functional and molecular level • • Advanced imaging Molecular tests Targeted drug A Targeted drug B Increased therapeutical efficiency Less side effects→ more quality of life • Avoidance of unnecessary therapies→ increase quality of life and reduce healthcare costs • • Targeted drug C Targeted drug D Page 9 March 2015 Restricted © Siemens AG 2015. All rights reserved Minimal invasive procedures shaping future therapy landscape RFA TACE Potentials of Interventional therapy as drivers • Enabling therapy for less fit and elderly patients • Treatment on outpatient basis • Reduction of mortality rates • Shortening length of hospital stays • Facilitating speedy recovery • Reduction of healthcare cost for patients • Opening new areas for therapy Ablation procedural growth by organ Source: MedMarket Dilligence Report Page 10 March 2015 Vertebroplasty Source: Radiologie Klinikum Koblenz Restricted © Siemens AG 2015. All rights reserved Oncology services have to develop along the care continuum – erase existing boundaries Hospital-centric model today Drivers of model transformation • • • • • • • • Medical practice changes to focus on coordinated, collaborative care across the continuum Standardized care approaches to reduce care variation Care process redesign to reduce unnecessary work in all care settings Optimized service distribution to ensure the right care at the right site Financial incentives of the new value-based payment models • Inefficient, fee for service Lack of coordination of services Lack of integration of services Hospital services Population-centric model tomorrow Physician and clinical services • • Prescription services Value based driven payments Integration of services to be patient centered Improved transition of care by IT solutions Home Health and Nursing home care Other services Source: http://healthaffairs.org Page 11 March 2015 Restricted © Siemens AG 2015. All rights reserved Shift to outpatient care – enabling the continuum of care Need for better transition of care from inpatient to outpatient in value based payment systems Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Care coordination Information exchange based on IT solutions/electronic health records Strengthening the role of general practitioners and auxiliary services Remote monitoring of patients to prevent hospitalization Standardized clinical care protocols Preventive care Outcome Cost Source: Medical Pharmacy & Oncology Trend report, 2012 Page 12 March 2015 Restricted © Siemens AG 2015. All rights reserved Cancer centers to increase care quality and outcomes Growing demand for high quality cancer centers (drivers) • Consolidation of services in well defined cancer centers massive increase of complexity of oncological care with increasing need for specialization • patients expectation of well organized, high quality and efficient services which requires centralization • emerging need for multidisciplinary treatment and disease orientated integration are of disciplines • increased focus on outcomes of therapy which tend to be better in specialized Growing number oncology centers centers, e.g. in breast cancer centers • Patients desire to select centers for their therapy based on performance and benchmarks (transparency of performance) “patient as consumer” “One of the most important aspects of health care delivery for cancer patients involves the need for centralization of treatment to high quality centers.” Beller, U. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Feb;22(2):177 Page 13 March 2015 Restricted © Siemens AG 2015. All rights reserved Value based care and risk/savings models to achieve cost control and cost effectiveness From profitable procedures to well-managed patients Strategic growth levers across payment models Fee-for-service world Value-based fee-for-service world Shared savings/ risk-based world Profitable procedures Efficiently managed care episodes Engaged patients Procedural specialists Multidisciplinary care teams Cross-continuum care management infrastructure Payer price escalation Episodic payment margin expansion Total cost of care reduction Source: Advisory Board Page 14 March 2015 Restricted © Siemens AG 2015. All rights reserved Patient centered medical home (PCMH) Patient centered medical home • • • Comprehensive care: prevention/wellness, acute care, chronic care. Requires a team of providers (physician, nurses, pharmacists, nutritionalists, social worker educationers and care coordinators) Patient centered: partnering with patients and families, respecting patients needs, culture etc. Enable patients to manage their own care Coordinated care: coordination across all elements of health care system including specialists care, hospitals, home health care, community services; critical for transition from inpatient to outpatient care Source: parkwaymedicalgroup.com • • • Page 15 Accessible services: shorter waiting times, enhanced in person hours, 24/7 access to the care team, email and telephone Quality/safety: commitment to quality improvement, evidence based medicine & decision support tools, performance measurement & improvement, measurement of patient experience & satisfaction Sharing quality & safety data with public to create transparency as commitment to quality March 2015 Economic benefits of PCMH • • • Reduced hospital care Reduced need for emergency care Reduced overuse of advanced diagnostic Restricted © Siemens AG 2015. All rights reserved Molecular guidance for therapy selection and safe application Current situation Increasing complexity of oncological therapy with changes from single to multiple drug regimens Growing risk of toxicities due to drug interactions and differences in patients metabolism Rapidly evolving new knowledge can‘t be handled anymore by individuals Etc… • • • • Decision support tools - potentials • • • • • • Help physicians to optimize and plan cancer treatment Increase safety of therapy application Will enable less experienced to apply oncological therapies and will help to mitigate shortages of oncologists Could reduce cost of care Increase productivity of hospitals by time savings Could help to improve compliance to treatment guidelines and care quality Page 16 March 2015 Source: http://http://www.google.de/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.medicalxpress.com Restricted © Siemens AG 2015. All rights reserved Access to cancer care in Russia Access to cancer care has been recognized as important variable to determine outcome in cancer patients Cooperating cancer center network Russian situation Decreased public funding of healthcare expenditures from 73.9% (1995) to 59.7 (2011) → increased burden of out of the pocket expenses Lack of trained workforce in several areas central to cancer care High discrepancies in quality between large metropolitan areas and rural areas leading to delay of diagnosis and lack of timely intervention • • • How to improve it ? • • • • • • • Page 17 Build more specialized cancer centers and treatment facilities to improve coverage Strengthen the outpatient sector/departments primary care Foster the building of care networks between cancer centers and surrounding care facilities Implementation of telemedicine approaches/decision support tools Optimize operational processes to increase efficiency of centers and reduce costs Education of healthcare providers, adapt payment to increase motivation of professionals Support international collaborations, clinical trials etc. to stimulate knowledge exchange March 2015 Source: R. Hazin et al. Lancet 11:204-210, 2010 Restricted © Siemens AG 2015. All rights reserved Integrational components of Cancer Centers to consider (not exhaustive) Clinical concept • Clinical Catchment Area • Clinical Solutions • Patients • Patient demand Collaboration and education • Regional collaboration within core area § Number of patients Near Home concept § Inpatient capacities § Surrounding Hospitals Best in class diagnostic & treatments § Outpatient facilities § • Outpatient centers/offices • Epidemiological trends • Patient compliance • Screening programs/ early detection • Patient communication Palliative Care/ Rehabilitation Program • Patient centered care & access to therapy • • Sustainable clinical facility concept • Department specific systems • End to end workflows • Hospital and Clinical Information • • Page 18 System • Integration of departments and services Financial sustainability (i.e. upcoming reimbursements) March 2015 § Clinical research concept § Education & training Logistics IT - Infrastructure • Center strategy and development Collaboration with leading national and international institutes on Patient friendly infrastructure Center Management • • • • Archive and Document Management Solutions • • a Patient Administration Systems Consumable Consumption Management Fully automated supply systems § Automated transport systems § RFID tracking Patient readiness concept Restricted © Siemens AG 2015. All rights reserved Conclusions for the Russian Oncology Market • Russia is facing a growing incidence of all major types of cancer with at present comparatively high mortality rate • Further drive and manage cancer screening and preventive programs to impact on cancer incidence and mortality – these could be allocated and executed by cancer centers • Increase coverage through high quality cancer centers and integrate their services into a region to increase the access to therapy. Drive multidisciplinary care • Enforce quality and efficiency standards/benchmarking to control high quality care delivery • Strengthen the outpatient sector by creation of care networks, decision support tools and education programs • Improve specialized cancer diagnostics (Imaging, Laboratory, Pathology etc.) to support therapy individualization • Change reimbursement from pay per performances to value based care and improve access to modern cancer drugs • Adapt health insurance to reduce need for out of pocket payments for specialized therapies to increase access to healthcare • Page 19 Improve environment for innovative clinical trials to improve access to care and innovations March 2015 Restricted © Siemens AG 2015. All rights reserved Contact Wieland Voigt, MD Associate Professor Specialist for Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology Palliative Medicine Head of Clinical Competence Center Oncology Siemens AG Healthcare Customer Solutions Division HC CX CRM HES CCC ONC Allee am Roethelheimpark 3 A 91052 Erlangen, Germany Tel: +49 9131 84-6988 Mobile: +49 172 2790401 mailto:wieland.voigt@siemens.com Page 20 March 2015 Restricted © Siemens AG 2015. All rights reserved
© Copyright 2024