Investor Presentation June 2015 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this presentation are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements discuss our current expectations and projections relating to the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business. You can identify forward-looking statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements may include words such as ‘‘aim,’’ ‘‘anticipate,’’ ‘‘believe,’’ ‘‘estimate,’’ ‘‘expect,’’ ‘‘forecast,’’ ‘‘outlook,’’ ‘‘potential,’’ ‘‘project,’’ ‘‘projection,’’ ‘‘plan,’’ ‘‘intend,’’ ‘‘seek,’’ ‘‘may,’’ ‘‘could,’’ ‘‘would,’’ ‘‘will,’’ ‘‘should,’’ ‘‘can,’’ ‘‘can have,’’ ‘‘likely,’’ the negatives thereof and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of the timing or nature of future operating or financial performance or other events. They appear in a number of places throughout this presentation and include statements regarding the Company’s intentions, beliefs or current expectations concerning, among other things, the Company’s results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, prospects, growth, strategies and the industry in which the Company operates. All forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those that the Company expected including such risk and uncertainties disclosed in the Company’s public filings with the SEC at www.sec.gov or www.zoeskitchen.com. The forward-looking statements included in this presentation are made only as of the date hereof. Non-GAAP Financial Measures This presentation contains certain non-GAAP financial measures. A “non-GAAP financial measure” is defined as a numerical measure of a company’s financial performance that excludes or includes amounts so as to be different than the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP in the statements of income, balance sheets or statements of cash flow of the company. The Company has provided a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable financial measure in the Appendix to this presentation. The non-GAAP financial measures used within this presentation are EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. The Company believes that the use of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA provides an additional tool for investors to use in evaluating ongoing operating results and trends and in comparing the Company’s financial measures with other fast casual restaurants, which may present similar non-GAAP financial measures to investors. For additional information about our non-GAAP financial measures, see our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 1 SENIOR MANAGEMENT PRESENTERS Kevin Miles President & Chief Executive Officer Jason Morgan Chief Financial Officer 2 MEET Zoës Kitchen Zoës Kitchen is a fast-casual restaurant concept serving wholesome Mediterranean-inspired dishes delivered with Southern hospitality Our Concept: Y Y Born in the Mediterranean, Raised in the South Our customer - educated, affluent women and their families – represent ~70% of our customer visits Our Culture: Y Delivering Goodness in the Communities We Serve Positioned for Growth: Y Y Y Attractive Unit Economics Leading Comparable Restaurant Sales Significant White Space 3 COMPANY SNAPSHOT Total Restaurants Key Statistics: Y Y Y Y 132 102 2014 AUV(1): Approx. $1.5 million 2014 Average Per Customer Spend: $9.98 21 2008 2014 Lunch / Dinner: ~60% / 40% (excl. catering) 31 2009 43 2010 75 57 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Revenue ($ millions) $171.7 $116.4 2014 Catering is ~16% of Revenue $50.2 $79.7 $46.3 $63.0 $20.8 $32.3 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Q1 '14 Q1 '15 11.9% 11.8% 13.4% 6.9% 6.7% 5.7% 7.7% Comp. Restaurant Sales Growth (2) (2.5%) (1) AUVs consist of the average sales of all Company-owned restaurants that have been open for a trailing 52-week period or longer. (2) Comparable restaurant sales for Company-owned restaurants open for 18 periods or longer. Periods refer to a four week reporting period, except for the thirteenth period of a 53-week year, which would contain five weeks; fifth week of the thirteenth period of a 53-week year not included in comparable restaurant sales calculation. 4 PROVEN PORTABILITY AND SIGNIFICANT GROWTH OPPORTUNITY Y Y Y Y Current Restaurant Footprint 149 restaurants in 16 states as of June 2015 For 2014, our top 20 performing restaurants were spread across seven different states 98% Company-owned Opened 30 Company-owned restaurants and acquired 5 franchise restaurants during 2014 5 GROWING BRAND EQUITY Twenty one consecutive fiscal quarters of positive comparable restaurant sales growth Two-Year Stacked Quarterly Comparable Restaurant Sales Growth Most Recent Quarter Prior Year's Quarter 12.1% 16.8% 11.9% 8.1% 10.4% 12.5% 14.1% 5.5% 15.0% 7.7% 3.8% 10.7% 13.0% 14.1% 13.5% 8.0% 16.8% 10.7% 11.9% (1) 5.7% 7.5% 14.1% 15.0% 12.5% 12.1% 8.1% 10.4% 5.5% 5.9% 7.7% 7.8% 7.7% 3.8% 5.7% Q1 '11 Q2 '11 Q3 '11 Q4 '11 Q1 '12 Q2 '12 Q3 '12 Q4 '12 Q1 '13 Q2 '13 Q3 '13 Q4 '13 Q1 '14 Q2 '14 Q3 '14 Q4' 14 Q1' 15 # of Comp. Restaurants 22 (Most Recent Quarter) 24 25 27 32 34 35 40 43 50 52 55 63 70 78 81 94 Note: Comparable restaurant sales for Company-owned restaurants open for 18 periods or longer. Periods refer to a four week reporting period, except for the thirteenth period of a 53-week year, which would contain five weeks; fifth week of the thirteenth period of a 53-week year not included in comparable restaurant sales calculation. (1) Adjusting for a calendar shift related to the 53rd week in 2012, comparable restaurant sales would increase in the fourth quarter of 2013 from 3.8% to 7.0%. 6 INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS Y Desirable Loyal Lifestyle Brand Y Simple. Tasty. Fresh! Y SouthernContemporary Mediterranean Hospitality Y Multiple Levers Differentiated Fast Casual and Customer Base with a Our Food – Delivering a with Experience Diverse Revenue Mix Provides Y Industry Leading Y for Growth Comparable Restaurant Sales Growth Attractive Unit Economic Model with Proven Portability and Significant White Space Y Experienced Management Team 7 FAST CASUAL LIFESTYLE BRAND Aspirational brand with broad appeal Customers see Zoës as a reflection of self. By rooting culture in delivering goodness we appeal to their attitudes and emotions. Cosmopolitan Casual Chic Y Y “ There’s a positive vibe every time I come here!” Inspired by high fashion and other relevant trends to create a high-energy atmosphere Mediterranean Cuisine Y Y Southern Hospitality with Personality “I feel good when I eat here because I’m fueling my body the right way” Multiple ways to use the brand with dine-in, to-go and catering social occasions Eat what you love. Y Y Y Team is a reflection of our customers Passion for life Delivering goodness naturally Love how you feel! 8 SIMPLE. TASTY. FRESH! Bringing Mediterranean mainstream Traditional Mediterranean preparation methods such as grilling and baking (no microwaves or fryers) Cooking philosophy rooted in rich traditions that celebrate food Fresh, high-quality ingredients that are predominantly preservative- and additive-free Menu offers an abundance of fresh fruits, vegetables and herbs, grains, olive oil and lean proteins Cater to dietary needs by offering vegetarian, vegan, gluten-free and calorie conscious menu selections Flavorful new menu additions with seasonal ingredients 9 LOYAL CUSTOMER BASE Concept designed to appeal to educated and affluent women Y Y Y Y Y Women along with their families, represent ~70% of customer visits Avg. Household Income >$100K Majority are college educated Strong influence on family mealtime decision-making Strong brand advocates: ~94% of surveyed customers intend to recommend Zoës Kitchen Our customers appreciate the extra time Zoës allows them to spend with family and friends to fuel a balanced and active lifestyle 10 OUR TEAM MEMBERS The heart and soul of Zoës Kitchen Y Y Y Y We invest in great talent to enable the growth of our brand People with high desire to serve and please Train through interactive online training ecosystem, LifeWORKS Prepared for growth: proactively training managers at one of our 21 training restaurants 11 EXPERIENCED MANAGEMENT TEAM Name Position Total Years of Experience Kevin Miles President & Chief Executive Officer 22 Years Jason Morgan Chief Financial Officer 19 Years Jeremy Hartley Chief Operating Officer 31 Years Allyn Taylor Vice President of Development 29 Years Rachel Phillips-Luther Vice President of Marketing 16 Years James Besch Vice President of Accounting & Controller 19 Years Michael Todd General Counsel 24 Years Prior Experience 12 Growing Zoës LEADING GROWTH IN FOOD RETAIL… Two-Year Stacked Unit Growth FY 2014 FY 2013 29.4% 22.0% 36.0% 20.8% 15.5% 14.4% 12.8% 23.1% 22.0% 16.2% 11.9% 17.1% 12.8% 11.8% 14.3% 13.1% 7.5% 9.0% 12.3% 11.4% 21.6% 10.2% 8.1% 10.7% 9.4% 11.9% 5.8% 7.6% 2.4% 2.4% Two-Year Stacked Comparable Store Sales Growth FY 2014 5.6% 9.9% 3.7% 10.8% 10.7% FY 2013 16.8% 6.9% 4.3% 6.9% 6.0% 7.0% 6.6% 5.9% 5.6% 1.1% 4.5% 6.5% 3.9% 0.3% 4.3% 2.9% 3.2% 3.3% 0.5% 3.3% 2.3% 1.3% 1.5% 1.1% (0.8%) Source: Public company filings. Note: Company-owned comparable store growth only. 14 … AND STRONG GROWTH IN UNIT VOLUMES ($ thousands) vs. Fast Casual Peers Average Unit Volumes $1,421 $1,470 $1,501 $2,502 $2,472 Early Stages Of Growth FY 2014 $1,299 $1,209 $1,106 $1,501 $1,147 $1,000+ 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 $1,274 $1,056 (1) 2014 Number of Restaurants 1,777 1,595 132 380 319 113 (1) 227 Source: Public company filings. Note: For Company-owned stores only. ZOES AUVs consist of the average sales of all Company-owned restaurants that have been open for a trailing 52-week period or longer. (1) Represents AUV at time of early growth stage: PNRA AUV of $1,274 represents 1998 AUV when it had 113 bakery-cafés and CMG AUV of $1,056 represents 2002 AUV when it had 227 restaurants. 15 INCREASE COMPARABLE RESTAURANT SALES Heighten Brand Awareness Y Y Continue to expand footprint Inspiring brand advocacy Increase Customer Frequency Grow our Off-Premise Business Flexible dining options and home meal replacement Offerings conducive to travel Y Y New menu additions Y Y Consumer trial through catering 16 SIGNIFICANT EXPANSION OPPORTUNITY Current Units % Unit Potential Remaining 100% 75% 50% 91% 0% Domestic Unit Potential 1,600+ 53% 1,755 1,880 82% 25% 149 56% 439 2,500 (1) ~4,000 (2) ~4,000 Source: Public company filings and Wall Street research. Note: Restaurant count of 149 as of June 2015 for Zoës Kitchen; as of end 2014 for CMG, NDLS and PNRA. (1) Based on June 2014 management estimate of 4,000 units in the U.S. (2) Based on December 2013 Wall Street research. 17 THE SCIENCE OF OUR EXPANSION STRATEGY Targeted site evaluation and acquisition process Y Y Y In-house real estate team has over 50 years of combined experience with brands such as Chipotle, Panera, Potbelly, Pei Wei, Starbucks and P.F. Chang’s Sophisticated analytical tools and flexible new restaurant model Target demographic makes Zoës a desirable tenant for landlords and developers; ~2,500 weekly customers drives traffic to complementary retail businesses End-Cap Free-Standing In-Line 18 ATTRACTIVE UNIT ECONOMIC MODEL YEAR 3 Target ($ thousands) Average Unit Volume % of 2013 Company Average $1,300 ~88% Restaurant Contribution (1) Margin ~18% Buildout Cost (2) $750 Cash-on-Cash Return 30%+ On average, new restaurants opened since the beginning of 2009 have exceeded these AUV and cashon-cash return targets within the third year of operations (1) Restaurant Contribution is defined as restaurant sales less restaurant operating costs, which are costs of sales, labor and store operating expenses. (2) Net of tenant allowances. 19 Financial Performance HISTORICAL FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE ($ Mil ions) Total Restaurants Total Revenue 132 $171.7 102 $116.4 75 $79.7 57 43 $50.2 31 $20.8 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2009 $32.3 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 21 HISTORICAL FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE ($ Mil ions) Adjusted EBITDA (2) Restaurant Contribution (1) $34.2 % Margin $16.0 $23.1 $10.9 $9.2 $16.9 $5.4 $10.4 $4.5 $6.5 $2.4 22.1% 20.7% 21.2% 21.5% 20.0% 20.0% 2009 2011 2013 2010 2012 2014 $0.9 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 (1) Restaurant Contribution defined as restaurant sales less restaurant operating costs, which are cost of sales, labor and store operating expenses. (2) See Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation on page 28. 22 STRONG MOMENTUM IN 1Q 2015 YTD ($ Mil ions) Total Revenue Total Restaurants 144 $46.3 115 Q1 '14 Q1 '15 Restaurant Contribution(2) $9.4 Q1 '14 Comp. Restaurant Sales Growth (1) $63.0 Q1 '14 Q1 '15 5.7% 7.7% Adjusted EBITDA(3) $13.7 $6.8 $3.8 Q1 '15 Q1 '14 Q1 '15 (1) Comparable restaurant sales for Company-owned restaurants open for 18 periods or longer. Periods refer to a four week reporting period, except for the thirteenth period of a 53-week year, which would contain five weeks; fifth week of the thirteenth period of a 53-week year not included in comparable restaurant sales calculation. (2) Restaurant Contribution defined as restaurant sales less restaurant operating costs, which are cost of sales, labor and store operating expenses. (3) See Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation on page 28. 23 FY 2015 Guidance Y Y Y Y Y Y Restaurant sales between $218 million and $223 million Royalty and franchise fees of approximately $0.2 million Comparable restaurant sales growth of 4.0% - 6.0% 31-33 Company-owned restaurant openings Restaurant contribution margin between 20.0% - 20.5% G&A expenses of $24.7 million (inclusive of $1.3 million of equity-based compensation expense) 24 LONG-TERM FINANCIAL TARGETS Double Restaurant Base over Next 4 Years 2% – 4% Annual Comparable Restaurant Sales Growth G&A and Operating Leverage 20%+ EBITDA GROWTH Note: These targets are forward-looking, are subject to significant business, economic, regulatory and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond the control of the Company and its management, and are based upon assumptions with respect to future decisions, which are subject to change. Actual results may vary and these variations may be material. For discussion of some of the important factors that could cause these variations, please consult the “Risk Factors” in the Company’s public filing with the SEC at www.sec.gov or www.zoeskitchen.com. Nothing in this presentation should be regarded as a representation by any person that these goals will be achieved and the Company undertakes no duty to update its goals. 25 INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS Y Lifestyle Brand Desirable Loyal Y Simple. Tasty. Fresh! Y Contemporary Mediterranean Southern Hospitality Y Multiple Levers Y Industry Leading Y Proven Portability Significant White Space Y Experienced Differentiated Fast Casual with a and Customer Base Our Food – Delivering a Experience with Diverse Revenue Mix Provides for Growth Comparable Restaurant Sales Growth Attractive Unit Economic Model with and Management Team 26 Appendix ADJUSTED EBITDA RECONCILIATION ($ thousands) Fiscal Year Ended, December 29, December 30, December 31, December 26, December 27, December 28, 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 $ (10,017) $ (3,715) $ (253) $ (27) $ (2,472) $ (2,815) 10,473 7,462 4,870 3,426 2,362 1,622 3,535 4,019 2,337 1,248 720 556 699 656 622 110 554 546 $ 4,690 $ 8,422 $ 7,576 $ 4,757 $ 1,163 $ (91) Net Loss, as reported Depreciation and amortization Interest expense, net Provision for income taxes EBITDA Asset disposals, closure costs, loss on interest cap and restaurant impairment (1) Management and consulting fees (2) Equity-based compensation expense Loss on extinguishment of debt Pre-opening costs (3) IPO and follow-on related expenses (4) Bargain purchase gain from acquisitions Executive relocation expenses (6) Adjusted EBITDA (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (5) $ Sixteen Weeks Ended, April 20, April 21, 2015 2014 $ 692 $ (9,988) 3,704 2,881 971 1,659 234 865 $ 5,601 $ (4,583) 150 200 240 (4) 289 147 47 19 113 6,332 978 2,109 265 73 1,938 294 126 917 232 190 806 123 293 544 142 201 551 305 848 113 6,120 978 816 1,463 - - - (541) - - - 384 - 170 16,005 $ 10,899 $ 9,153 $ 5,440 $ 2,411 $ 949 $ 6,801 $ 3,847 Represents costs related to impairment of long-lived assets, gain or loss on disposal of property and equipment and restaurant closure expenses, loss on interest rate cap and restaurant closure expenses. Represents fees payable to Brentwood pursuant to the Corporate Development and Administrative Services Agreement and fees paid to Greg Dollarhyde pursuant to the Consulting Agreement. Represents expenses directly associated with the opening of new restaurants that are incurred prior to opening, including pre-opening rent. Represents fees and expenses that were incurred, but not capitalized, in relation to our IPO completed on April 16, 2014 and a follow-on offering completed on August 19, 2014. Represents the excess of the fair value of net assets acquired over the purchase price related to our acquisitions of the Houston franchise restaurants. Represents costs associated with the relocation packages of an executive. 28
© Copyright 2025