Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE) Volume 5, Issue 1 April 2015 MIJE is indexed in Turkish Educational Index, ASOS index, Index Copernicus, EBSCO Pub, Educational Research Abstracts (ERA), Aniji, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI) and ERIC (Published articles in MIJE are indexed by ERIC which is accepted by ERIC reviewers. Articles which are indexed by ERIC indicated in the table of contents in relevant issue) OWNER YALÇINÖZ,Tankut (Rector of Mevlana University) EDITOR IN CHIEF ÇELİK, Vehbi (Dean of Education Faculty) EDITOR GÜMÜŞ, Emine ASSOCIATE EDITORS NEL, Norma LETSEKA, Moeketsi SAMUEL, Mihael Anthony ASSISTANT EDITORS Durmuş, Alpaslan KAYA, Sinan SECRETARIAT OF THE JOURNAL TOZKOPARAN, Süleyman, Burak EDITORIAL BOARD ABADIANO, Helen R. (Central Connecticut State University, USA) AGAYEV, Ejder (Qa fqaz University, Azerbaijan) AKBAŞ, Okta y (Kırıkkale University, Turkey) AKKOYUNLU, Buket (Hacettepe University, Turkey) AKMAN, Berri n Hacettepe University, Turkey AKPINAR, Burhan (Fıra t University, Turkey) AKPINAR, Ya vuz (Boğaziçi University, Turkey) AKTÜMEN, Muha rrem (Ahi Evra n University, Turkey) AKYOL, Ha ya ti (Gazi University, Turkey) ALACACI, Cengi z (Florida International University, USA) AL-MABUK, Ra thi (University of NorthernIowa, USA) Ana s tasiadou, Sofia D. (University of West Ma cedonia, Greece) ARICIOĞLU, Ahu (Pa mukkale University, Turkey) BAEZZAT, Fereshteh (University of Ma zandaran, Iran) BALOĞLU, Nuri (Ahi Evra n University) BAYRAM, Servet (Ma rmara University, Turkey) BECK, Mi tchell (Central Connecticut State University, USA) BİLGİN, İbrahim (Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey) BİRGİN, Os man (Uşak University, Turkey) BOOYSE, Joha n (University of South Afri ca, South Africa) BOZDOĞAN, Aykut Emre (Giresun University, Turkey) BOZOĞLAN, Ba hadır (Mevlana University, Turkey) BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK, Şener (Gazi University, Turkey) ÇAKIR, Abdulkadir (Mevlana University, Turkey) ÇAKIR, Recep (Amasya University, Turkey) ÇANKAYA, İbra him (Uşak University, Turkey) ÇELİK, Vehbi (Mevlana University, Turkey) CHUANG, Hs ueh-hua (National Sun Yat-sen University, Ta yvan) ÇOŞKUN, Eyyup (Mus ta fa Kemal University, Turkey) DANIŞMAN, Yusuf (Mevlana University, Turkey) DEMİREAY, Uğur (Anadolu University, Turkey) DEMİREL, Şener (Fırat University, Turkey) DEMİRLİ, Ci hat (İstanbul Ticaret University, Turkey) DEREVENSKY, Jeffrey L. (McGi ll University, Ca nada) DIBOLL, Mi ke (University of Sussex, UK) DOĞRU, S. Sunay Yıldırım(Dokuz Eyl ül University, Turkey) ECIRLI, Ahmet (Universiteti Bedër, Albania ERBAY, Fi liz (Mevlana University, Turkey) ERGÜN, Mus tafa (Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey) FALLAHI, Vi da (Shiraz University, Iran ) GAO, Pi ng (University of Northern Iowa, USA) GÖMLEKSİZ, Mehmet Nuri (Fırat University, Turkey) GÜNDÜZ, Mus tafa (Yıldız Teknik University, Turkey) GÜNEL, Mura t (TED, Turkey) GÜROL, Mehmet (Yıldız Technical University, Turkey) GURSEL, Mus a (Mevlana University, Turkey) GÜZELLER, Cem Okta y (Akdeniz University, Turkey) HALAT, Erdoğa n (Afyon Koca tepe University, Turkey) HALAI, Nel ofer(Aga Khan University, Pa kistan) HAMMOND, John (University of Ca nberra, Australia) HARPUTLU, Leyl a (Ahi Evra n University, Turkey ) HERRING, Ma ry C. (University of Northern Iowa, USA) HOSSEINCHARI, Ma ssound (Shiraz University, Iran ) HUANG, Chi -Jen (National Chiayi University, Taiwan) HUTSON, Brya nt (The University of North Ca rolina a, USA) İŞÇİOĞLU, Ersin (Eastern Mediterranean University, TRNC) IŞIK, Erka n (Mevl a na Uni vers i ty, Turkey) İŞMAN, Ayteki n (Sakarya University, Turkey) KARA, Ahmet (Adıyaman University, Turkey) KARADAĞ, Ruhan (Adıyaman University, Turkey) KARADENİZ, Şirin (Bahçeşehir University, Turkey) KARAMI, Morteza (University of Ma zandaran, Iran) KARAKUŞ, Mehmet (Zirve University, Turkey) KARAMI, Morteza (University of Ma zandaran, Iran) KARATAŞ, Serçi n (Gazi University, Turkey) KARIM, Reza ul (Leading University, Ba ngladesh) KAUR, Ki ra ndeep (Punjabi university, India) KAYA, Os ma n Nafiz (Fırat University, Turkey) KESER, Ha fize (Ankara University, Turkey) KOCABAŞ, İbra him (Fırat University, Turkey) KOÇAK, Recep (Gazi Osman Pa şa University, Turkey) KUMARAN, Dura ikkannu (University of Ma dras, India) LAVICZA, Zs olt (Cambridge University, UK) LEBLANC, Ra ymond (University of Ottawa, Ca nada) LEMMER, El eanor (University of South Africa, South Afri ca) LOUW, Ga bri el (North-West University, South Afri ca) MCKEOWN, John A. G. (Mevl ana University, Turkey) MEMMEDOV, Behmen (Qafqaz University, Azerbaijan) MICHAIL, Ka l ogiannakis (University of Crete, Greece) MITTAL, Shree Ram (University of Delhi, India) MOONSAMY, Sha ron (University of the Witwatersrand, S.Africa) MSILA, Vuyi sile (University of South Africa, South Africa) NAM, Jeonghee (Pusan National University, Korea) NEL, Norma (University of South Afri ca, South Africa) ODABAŞI, H. Ferhan (Anadolu University, Turkey) OKUYUCU, Ci ha n (Yıldız Technical University University, Turkey) ÖMEROĞLU, Es ra (Gazi University, Turkey) OMRAN, Ebra him Salehi (University of Ma zandaran, Iran) ORAL, Behçet (Dicle University, Turkey) ÖZDEMİR , M. Soner (Kırıkkale University, Turkey) ÖZDEMİR, Selçuk (Gazi University, Turkey) ÖZER, Ba yra m (Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey) PANDAY, Shefali (University of Mumbai, India) PAPE, Stephen J.(University of Florida, USA) PEKER, Mura t (Afyon Koca tepe, Turkey) GIJON PUERTA, José (Universidad de Granada, Spain) PHASHA, Tl a kale Nareadi (University of South Afri ca, South Africa) PING-KWAN, Fok (The Chinese University of Hong Kong) POTGIETER , Ca l vyn (University of South Africa, South Africa) QUADIR, Ta rik (Mevlana University, Turkey) RANA, Ri zwan Akram (University of the Punjab, Pa kistan) SADEGHI, Abbas (University of Guilan Iran) SAMUEL, Mi cha el (University of Kwa zulu-Nata, South Africa) ŞAHİN, İsmail (Selçuk University, Turkey) ŞAHİN, Sami (Gazi University, Turkey) SAMANI, Si amak (Islamic Azad University, Iran) SARI, Mus tafa (Mevlana University, Turkey) SEMERCİ, Çeti n (Fırat University, Turkey) ŞENAY, Ha san (Mevlana University, Turkey) SHAHIM, Si ma (Shiraz University, Iran ) SHARRA, Steve(Michigan State University, USA) SHELLEY, Ma ck (Iowa State University, USA) SÜNBÜL , Al i Murat(Selçuk University, Turkey) TABAKU, El i da (Universiteti Bedër, Al bania) TAŞPINAR, Mehmet (Gazi University, Turkey) THOMPSON, Ann D. (Iowa State University, USA) TÖREMEN, Fa ti h (Zirve University, Turkey) Trotma n, Wayne (Izmir Ka tip Çelebi University) TÜYSÜZ, Cengiz (Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey) UZUNBOYLU, Hüseyin (Near East University, TRNC) UZOGLU, Mus tafa (Giresun University, Turkey) URE, Omer (Mevl ana University, Turkey) YALÇIN, Pa şa (Erzincan University, Turkey) YALIN, H. İbra him (Gazi University, Turkey) YAMAN, Sül eyman (Zonguldak Karaelmas University, Turkey) YILMAZ, Erca n (Selçuk University, Turkey) YÖRÜK, Si nan (Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey) REVIEWER OF THE ISSUE Ha san EŞİCİ, Hasan Kalyoncu Uni. Ayşe AYPAY, Es kişehir Os mangazi Uni. Etem YEŞİLYURT, Mevlana Uni. Ayşe Negi ş IŞIK, Mevlana Uni. Seda t ŞEN, Harran Uni. Erka n IŞIK, Mevlana Uni. Za fer TANGÜLÜ, Mugla Uni. Erol KOÇOĞLU, İnonu Uni. Si nan KAYA, Mevlana Uni. Yus uf ÖZDEMİR, Mevlana Uni. Gürs el GULER, Bozok Uni. Sul eyman GOKSOY, Duzce Uni. Ya hya ALTINKURT, Mugla Uni. Serpil KILIÇ, Fatih Uni. Mehmet KANIK, Mevlana Uni. Abi din DAĞLI, Dicle Uni. Şehnaz YAYLA CEYLAN, Ka rabük Uni. Al i Ça ğatay KILINÇ, Ka rabük Uni. Ha kan KARA. Dumlupınar Uni. Ti mur KOCAOĞLU, Mi chigan State Uni. Sa bri SİDEKLİ, Mugla Uni. Abdul kadir TUNA, Kastamonu Uni. Mehmet Emir KOKSAL, Ondokuz Ma yıs Uni. Ahmet BEDEL, Mevlana Uni. TABLE OF CONTENTS Examination The Effect of Values Education Which is Given Adolescents on Self-Regulation Strategies http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.35.5.1 Sinem Ergun Kaplan, Bulent Dilmac........................... ............................................... 1-9 According to the Opinions of Teachers and Students Active Citizenship Education in Elementary School http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.61.5.1 Yucel Oksuz, Ceren Cevik Kansu…........................... ................................................ 10- 25 The View of Teachers of First Graders Regarding Scheduling the Age of Starting School to an Earlier Time http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.15.07.5.1 Huseyin Anilan, Yalcin Bay………............................ ................................................ 26- 44 The Relationship among Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptual Knowledge, Opinions Regarding Proof and Proof Skills http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.71.5.1 Muhammet Doruk, Abdullah Kaplan….............................. ....................................... 45- 57 Effect of Seniority on Teachers’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Meta-Analysis http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.76.5.1 Cevat Elma, Tufan Aytac.............................................................................................. 58- 76 Reality therapy oriented intervention program for cyberbullying behaviors and testing its efficiency http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.64.5.1 Taskin Tanrikulu, Mustafa Koc, Orhan Tolga Aricak............................................... 77- 87 Formative Assessment, Teacher-directed Instruction and Teacher Support in Turkey: Evidence from PISA 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.15.01.5.1 Ibrahim Delen, Mehmet Sukru Bellibas..................................................................... 88- 102 Student Attitudes Towards Change From Ability Grouping To Heterogeneous Grouping At A University Class http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.19.5.1 Mustafa Bahar.............................................................................................................. 103- 114 Mathematical Language Used in the Teaching of Three Dimensional Objects: The Prism Example http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.15.11.5.1 Zeynep Cakmak, Fatih Bas, Ahmet Isik, Mehmet Bekdemir, Meryem Ozturan Sagirli ................ 115- 129 A Philosophical Analysis On The Relationship Between The Problems Of The Modern Era And Education http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.86.5.1 Mikail Soylemez…………………............................................................................... 130- 140 Evaluating the Teacher’s Guides of a Recently Published Course Book Series for Young Learners in Turkey http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.69.5.1 Seyit Omer Gok............................................................................................................ 141- 164 Short Turkish Version of Proactive Scale: A Study of Validity and Reliability http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.12.5.1 Ahmet Akin, Neslihan Arici Ozcan............................................................................. 165- 172 A Brief Review of Literature on Using Technology to Help Language Learners to Improve Their Language Skills http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.77.5.1 Eyup Bayram Guzel.................................................................................................... 173- 180 The Effect of Drama in Education on Language and Communication Skills of Children Between 48-60 Month-Old http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.15.04.5.1 Filiz Erbay, Kezban Tepeli, Ozden Kuscu................................................................ 181- 188 Creativity And Sense Of Humor Of Elementary School Principals http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.15.05.5.1 Bahar Senol, Ali Aksu............................................................................................... 189- 205 Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE) Vol. 5(1), pp. 1-9, 1 April, 2015 Available online at http://mije.mevlana.edu.tr/ http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.35.5.1 Examination The Effect of Values Education Which is Given Adolescents on Self-Regulation Strategies Sinem Ergün Kaplan1 Education Curriculum Department, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey Bülent Dilmaç2 Psychological Counseling and Guidance Department, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey Article history Received: 18.03.2014 Received in revised form: 11.02.2015 Accepted: 22.02.2015 Key words: Values, Values Education, Self-Regulation, SelfRegulation Strategies The purpose of this study is to test the effect of values education which is applied to adolescents on their self-regulation strategies. The research was carried on the third grade students in Çumra Trade Vocational High School in Konya in 2011-2012 education years. Six female and five male students were tested in both experimental and control group. Firstly, pretest was conducted on experimental and control groups in the research. Secondly, values education activities which consist 20 sessions were conducted on experimental group twice a week out of the lessons. Activities were performed by the researcher. On the other hand, no activities were applied on control group. It is seen, there is a significant difference between the pre-test scores and post-test scores of the experimental group in favour of the post-test in the aspect of selfregulation at the end of the research. Also, It is found that, there is a crucial difference in utilization of cognitive strategy, self-efficacy, intrinsic value and test anxiety of students between experimental and control group. According to the findings, it is concluded that the values education which was applied to adolescents, has positive effects on the development of the self-regulation strategies. Introduction Education is defined as, variations of behaviours with the effect of other people (Başaran, 1991). It can be said that, a value education programme which includes affective sides of education should be prepared for changing these behaviours. Although it is commonly agreed that it is helpful to change behaviours, it is a topic of discussion when values education should be given (Dilmaç, 2007; İşcan, 2007; Lamberta, 2004). Some of the researcher suggest that values education can always be applied (Dilmaç, 2007) others argue that because adolescents, who experience puberty in the most intense are open to change, this term becomes important for them (Kuşcu, 2009). The stage which includes puberty, takes place identity crisis (Cebeci, 2005). It is thought; values education which is given adolescents will be more effective on this term because adolescents who experience identity crisis will find their identity easier with the help of values education. On the other hand, according to research by Knafo and Schwartz, discussions in the family about values, reveal negative feelings (Knafo & Schwartz, 2003). This negative situation can reduce motivation of adolescents, when it is contrast to parents’ values and it can break down adolescents’ 1 2 sinemergun87@hotmail.com bulentdilmac@gmail.com Examination The Effect of Values Education Which is Given…S. E. Kaplan & B. Dilmaç comprehension about parents' values and ability of comprehension. Therefore, it is very important to increase adolescents’ motivational beliefs and self-regulation strategies, which influence these motivational beliefs (Zimmerman, 1990; Cabı, 2009). Definitions of Values, Values Education Although a lot of researches have been made, they haven’t reached at a common view about the definition of “value” concept. Value can be expressed as an imaginary scale which is used to determine the importance of something (TDK, 2007). Values are also, defined as main rules that base on value judgements (Halstead, 1996: 6). It is to made choice and judged between alternatives that are based on distinction of good or bad helping of values. Values represent ideal desires that people want rather than people have. It is claimed that everything in the world can be separated as good or bad and value can be defined as good, bad or good and bad (Dunlop, 1996: 69). Garia handles values as tangible and intangible. According to Garia, value is described as positive or negative ideas that represent a specific behaviour and aim of the existence. As a point of moral view, value is expressed as the key of moral and religion (Nesbitt & Henderson, 2003: 77) and as a point of cultural view; value is expressed as means which are used to reach desired will (Kluckhohn, 1951: 395). When philosophical movements are thought, it is seen that, different views about the definition of value are exist. According to idealists due to universe is infinite and worldwide, values are same everywhere and they are universal principles. Realists advocate that it is necessary that values should be built according to the laws of nature. Pragmatists argue that values can change every condition; on the other hand existentialists express individuals should choose values with their own will (as cited in Akbaba-Altun, 2003, p. 9). Definitions of Self-Regulation Strategies Other variable of research is “self-regulation” concept. No matter how process of education is good, learning depends on student’s motivation and tendency to learning. So it is very important to educate student according to learning style which is effective on them. The need of learning and regulation in each environment for individual reveals as “self-regulation” concept (Pintrich, 2000:483). Self-regulation is a versatile combination of variables related to motivation and some processes (Cleary and Zimmerman, 2004:537). Researches about selfregulation (Zimmerman, 2008; Cabı, 2009) demonstrate a positive significant relation between self-regulation learning strategies, motivation beliefs and academic achievement. For this reason, preparing self-regulation activities is a necessity for students because these activities help students with learning effectively in the school and out of school (Altun and Sertel, 2006; cited in Cabı, 2009, p.4). It can be said by improving cognitive, motivational and behavioural strategies of students, students’ intrinsic impulse can rise. The self-regulated learning strategies are methods that students use to achieve learning goals (Chih, 2006: 5). These strategies are related to the regulation of academic cognitive (Zimmerman and Pons, 1986). The regulation of academic cognitive strategies are classified as cognitive methods, self-regulation strategies which are used for regulating academic cognition (metacognitive strategies) and resource management strategies (Zimmerman and Pons, 1986). Cognitive strategies are stated as cognitive behaviours that are performed to achieve a learning goal (Schneider and Weinert, 1990; cited in Salovaara, 2005, p.21). These strategies are classified as rehearsal, elaboration and organization strategies (Salovaara, 2005: 23). Metacognitive strategies are related to monitoring and regulation of individual’s own cognitive process (Alexander et al. , 1991). Metacognitive strategies include planning, monitoring and regulating activities (Zimmerman and Martinez-Pons, 1986). Resource -2- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 1-9, 1 April, 2015 management strategies are methods which are related to check and manage the effect of individual’s environment (Pintrich, 1993; cited in Chih, 2006, p.42). There are also motivational beliefs which encourage the use of these strategies (Üredi, 2005: 25). These motivational beliefs are goal orientation, task value and self-efficacy (Roberts, 1992; cited in Chih, 2006, p.21). Also emotional reactions, which are related to tasks of learner, are stated as affective activities (test anxiety) by Pintrich (Pintrich ve De Groot, 1990; cited in Üredi, 2005, p.25). Purpose of the study The aim of this study is to test the effect of values education which given adolescents on their self-regulation strategies. Hypothesises of Survey 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Values education, which was given adolescents, increases self-regulation. Values education, which was given adolescents, increases cognitive strategy usage. Values education, which was given adolescents, increases self-efficacy. Values education, which was given adolescents, intrinsic value. Values education, which was given adolescents, reduces test anxiety. Method This study was performed with experimental test model. The experimental method is a type of research in which the observing data is created to explore the causality of relations between the variables, which are taken over by the researcher (Karasar, 2007). The research was carried on the third grade students in Çumra trade vocational high school in Konya in 2011-2012 education years. Six female and five male students were tested in both experimental and control group. The process of the research covers in March - June 2012. Data collection tool Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire The self-regulation strategies and motivational beliefs of students are tested in the research with “Motivated Strategies for Learning” questionnaire created by Pintrinch and DeGroot (1990) and adapted by Üredi (2005). 44 sentences and 7 levels in the questionnaire are applied. It includes two dimensions, which constitute of self-regulation strategies and motivational beliefs in questionnaire. The dimension of self-regulation strategy involves two scales which are related to the cognitive strategy use (13 sentences) and self-regulation (9 sentences). On the other hand the dimension of motivational beliefs includes three scales which are related to self-efficacy (9 sentences), intrinsic value (9 sentences) and test anxiety (4 sentences). Cognitive strategy dimension includes rehearsal, elaboration and organization and self-regulation dimension involves metacognitive strategies like planning, monitoring and regulating. Self-efficacy scale of motivational beliefs dimension tests determine perception, which is related to performance of classroom and reliance. Moreover, intrinsic value scales of dimension of motivational beliefs are related to perception the importance of classroom study. Test anxiety scale of dimension of motivational beliefs tests perception related to exams. Cronbach alfa values are calculated as 84 in self-regulation scale, 92 in self-efficacy scale, 88 in intrinsic value scale and 81 in test anxiety scale (Üredi, 2005). -3- Examination The Effect of Values Education Which is Given…S. E. Kaplan & B. Dilmaç Activities which were used in values education programme have been prepared by researcher before practise. Practise has performed between March and June 2012. As beginning, pretests have been conducted on experimental and control group. Later activities were carried on experimental group in 2 hours in a week. Activities were performed by researcher. At the end of practice, post-tests were conducted on experimental and control group and compared. Analysis of Data Analysis of Covariance was performed in the research to measure the effectiveness of experimental process. Also it is used to compare the result of pre-test and post-tests. After practice, the results of survey were analysed in SPSS programme. Findings Findings related hypothesises are presented in this section. Statistics of that “values education given adolescents increased self-regulation” were given in Table 1 and Table 2. Table 1. According to Groups Self-regulation of Post-Test Average Scores Descriptive Statistics Groups N Average Recovered Average Experimental 11 57.83 57.98 Control 11 27.18 27.02 As, it can be seen from Table 1, it is discovered that average of experimental group is 58, 83; average control group is 27, 18. Average of post-tests and control group, 57, 98 and 27, 02 respectively. The results of ANCOVA which to test difference between recovered average are given in Table 2. Table 2. The Result of Recovered Post-Test Average Scores according to Groups Selfregulation Pre-test Results (ANCOVA Results) Var. K. Intrinsic Value Pre-Test (Reg.) Group Error Total *p<, 005; **p<, 001 KT 708.042 Sd 1 5269.969 1 1149.231 19 46757.000 22 KO 708.042 F 11.706** 5269.969 60.486 587.127** It is understood that, according to ANCOVA there is an important difference between selfregulation of groups [F (1; 22) = 11.706, p<.001]. Therefore, self-regulation of experimental group given values education ( =27.02) in significant level. = 57.98,) is higher than self-regulation of control group ( Statistics of the second hypothesis that was “values education given adolescents increased cognitive strategy usage” were given in Table 3 and Table 4. Table 3. According to Groups Cognitive Strategy Usage of Post-Test Average Scores Descriptive Statistics Groups N Average Recovered Average Experimental 11 70.18 69.85 -4- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 1-9, 1 April, 2015 Control 11 45.36 45.69 As it is seen from Table 4, it is discovered that average of experimental group is 70, 18; average control group is 45, 36. The results of ANCOVA which to test difference between recovered average are given in Table 4. Table 4. The Result of Recovered Post-Test Average Scores according to Groups Cognitive Strategy Use Pre-test Results (ANCOVA Results) Var. K. KT Sd KO F 1 697.790 12.386** Intrinsic Value Pre Test 697.790 (Reg.) 3199.629 1 3199.629 56.795** Group 1070.392 19 56.336 Error 78585.000 22 Total *p<, 05; **p<, 01 According to the result of ANCOVA, it is understood that, according to the result of ANCOVA there is a significant difference between self-regulation of groups [F (1; 22) = 11.706, p<.001]. Cognitive strategy usage of experimental group given values education ( =69.85), is higher than cognitive strategy usage of control group ( level. =45.69) in significant The third hypothesis of research was “values education given adolescents increased selfefficacy”. With this aim, the statistics were given in Table 5 and 6. Table 5. According to Groups Self-efficacy of Post- Test Average Scores Descriptive Statistics Groups N Average Recovered Average Experimental 11 67.09 66.96 Control 11 30.91 31.08 The average of experimental group and control group are calculated as 67.09 and control group is 30.91. Average of post-tests of groups and control group 66, 96 and 31, 08 respectively. The results of ANCOVA which to test difference between recovered average are given in Table 6. Table 6. The Result of Recovered Post-Test Average Scores according to Groups SelfEfficacy Pre-test Results (ANCOVA Results) Var. K. KT Sd KO F 46.684 1 46.684 1.776* Self-efficacy pre-test (Reg.) 7042.114 1 7042.114 264.880** Group 505.134 19 26.586 Error 60574.000 22 Total *p<, 005; **p<,001 According to the result of ANCOVA it is understood that, there is a significant difference between self-efficacy of groups [F (1; 22) = 1.776, p<.005]. According to this, self-efficacy of experimental group given values education ( =66.96,) is higher than self-efficacy of control -5- Examination The Effect of Values Education Which is Given…S. E. Kaplan & B. Dilmaç group ( =31.08) in significant level. The forth hypothesis of research was “values education given adolescents increased intrinsic value”. With this aim, the statistics were given in Table 7 and 8. Table 7. According to Groups intrinsic value of Post-Test Average Scores Descriptive Statistics Groups N Average Recovered Average Experimental 11 56.189 56.159 Control 11 34.090 34.114 It is found that average of experimental group is 56.189; average control group is 34.090. Average of post-test of groups and control groups 56,159 and 34,114 respectively. The results of ANCOVA which to test difference between recovered average are given in Table 8. Table 8. The Result of Recovered Post- Test Average Scores according to Groups Intrinsic Value Pre-test Results (ANCOVA Results) Var. K. KT Sd KO F 91.461 1 91.461 3.260* Intrinsic Value Ön Test (Reg.) 2672.393 1 2672.393 95.249** Group 533.084 19 28.057 Error 48129.000 22 Total *p<05; **p<,001 According to the result of ANCOVA, it is understood that there is a significant difference between intrinsic value of groups [F (1; 22) = 3.260, p<.005]. According to this, self-efficacy of experimental group given values education ( control group ( =56.159) is higher than intrinsic value of =34.114) in significant level. The fifth hypothesis of research was “values education given adolescents reduced test anxiety”. With this aim, the statistics were given in Table 9 and 10. Table 9. According to Groups test anxiety of Post- Test Average Scores Descriptive Statistics Groups N Average Recovered Average Experimental 11 8.545 8.804 Control 11 14.636 14.378 The average of experimental group and control groups are calculated as 8.545 and 14.636. Average of post-test of groups, and control group 8.804 and 14.378 respectively. The results of ANCOVA which to test difference between recovered average are given in Table 10. Table 10. The Result of Recovered Post- Test Average Scores according to Groups Test Anxiety Pre-test Results (ANCOVA Results) Var. K. KT Sd KO F 1 80.181 4.440* Intrinsic Value Pre Test 80.181 (Reg.) 167.761 1 167.761 9.290** Group 343.091 19 18.057 Error 3583.000 22 Total -6- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 1-9, 1 April, 2015 *p<05; **p<, 001 According to the result of ANCOVA, it is understood that, there is a significant difference between test anxiety of groups [F (1; 22) = 4.440, p<.005]. According to this, test anxiety of experimental group given values education ( group ( =8,804) is lower than test anxiety of control =14,378) in significant level. Conclusion The effect of the values education given adolescents on self-regulation strategies and on motivational beliefs which provide the usage of self-regulation strategies is discussed and interpreted in this section. The first hypothesis of research was “values education given adolescents increased selfregulation”. This hypothesis means values education given adolescents has increased selfregulation which includes metacognitive strategies which include monitoring, planning, regulating and resource management strategies. “Toiling”, “sharing”, “patience”, “analysing you”, “recognition you”, “curiosity”, “managing time effectively”, “leadership”, “interested in all life” activities are presented in values education programme. To remind learners how to describe himself/ herself and his/her environment, helping learners to remember when learner forgets something, to remind them in which occasions they can take leadership and recognize the importance of time are aimed in these activities. It is thought that these activities help learner with making own plan and to remind her/him necessary documents when learner needs it and with these way, helping learners to solve the problem with their families or friends on his/her own. Thus it is supposed that these activities are related to self-regulation. Also they increased self-regulation. The second hypothesis of research was “values education given adolescents has increased self-regulation strategies which include rehearsal, elaboration, organization strategies. “Loving learning” and loving success” activities are presented in values education programme. To teach learner the most effective and the quickest learning method, and to show happiness when learners gain information permanently are aimed in these activities. It is thought that these activities are related to creating the easiest way of learning for students who have different physical, social, musical, naturalist, intrinsic, verbal, mathematical and visual intelligence. Thus, it is supposed that learner will succeed with creating their own learning style at the end of these activities. It is thought that students become more successful about connecting old and new informations at the end of activities. Their motivation is increased by the effect of reaching their aim. Thus their memories become stronger. Therefore it is thought these activities have positive effect on the cognitive strategy use. The third hypothesis of research was “values education given adolescents increased selfefficacy”. This hypothesis means values education given adolescents has increased selfefficacy. “Initiative”, “self-confidence” and “courage” activities are presented in values education programme. It is aimed that learner should trust himself/herself completely in these activities. It is thought that these activities increased self-confidence and motivated her/him. Thus it is supposed that these activities have positive effect on self-efficacy. The forth hypothesis of research was “values education given adolescents has increased intrinsic value in a positive way. This hypothesis means values education given adolescents has increased task value from self-regulation strategies and intrinsic value from goal -7- Examination The Effect of Values Education Which is Given…S. E. Kaplan & B. Dilmaç orientation. "Learning loving", "analysing you", "loving success", "curiosity", "knowing you”, “loyalty" and "sensitivity" activities are presented in values education programme. It is aimed that learner should realize his/her own characteristics, be careful about choosing the best for her/him and improve his/her abilities in these activities. It is thought that students want to know something for their own sake at the end of these activities. Thus it is supposed that these activities are related to intrinsic value and have positive effect on intrinsic value. The fifth hypothesis of research was “values education given adolescents reduced test anxiety”. This hypothesis means values education given adolescents has reduced test anxiety. “Risk taking”, “controlling themselves” and “responsibility" activities are presented in value education programme. It is aimed in these activities that learner should know him/her responsibilities and control himself/herself in stress occasion and take risk if it is necessary. It is thought that these activities help student not to panic before exam and control him/her. Thus, it is assumed that these activities are related to test anxiety and have negative impact on test anxiety. Acknowledgement This article was presented in the Sinem Ergün Master Thesis in Necmettin Erbakan University. References Akbaba- Altun, S. (2003). Eğitim yönetimi ve değerler. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 1 (1), 718. [Education management and values]. Values Education Journals, 1 (1), 7- 18 Alexander, P. A. , Schallert, D. L. & Hare, V. C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 61 (3) , 315- 343. Başaran, İ. E. (1991). Örgütsel Davranış [Organizational Behavior]. Ankara: AÜ Eğitim Fakültesi Yayını. Cabı, E. (2009). Öz Düzenlemeye Dayalı Karma Öğrenimin Öğrenci Başarısı ve Motivasyonuna Etkisi [The Effect of Blended Learning Based on Self-Regulated on Students’ Achievement and Motivation]. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. Cebeci, A. (2005). İlköğretim Din Kültürü ve Ahlâk Bilgisi Derslerinde Ahlâkî Değerlerin Eğitimi ve Öğretimi [Department of Study of Religion and Philosophy Religious Training Science Branch the Training and Teaching of Moral Values in the Subjects Called Religious Culture and Moral Knowledge During Primary School Education]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bursa. Chih, M. (2006). The Effect of the Use of Self- Regulated Learning Strategies on College Students’ Performance and Satisfaction in Physical Education. Australian Catholic University, Avustralya Cleary, T. J. , Zimmerman, B.J. (2004). Self-Regulation Empowerment Program: A SchoolBased Program To Enhance Self-Regulated And Self-Motivated Cycles Of Student Learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41 (5), 537- 550 Dilmaç, B. (2007). Bir Grup Fen Lisesi Öğrencisine Verilen İnsani Değerler Eğitiminin İnsani Değerler Ölçeği ile Sınanması [The Examination of Humanistic Values Education Programme Given a Group of Science High School with Humanistic Values Scale]. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya. -8- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 1-9, 1 April, 2015 Dunlop, F. (1996). Democratic Values and the Foundations of Political Education. In Halstead J &, Taylor J (Eds.), Values in Education and Education in Values (68- 78). London: The Falmer Press. Halstead, M. J. (1996). Values in Education and Education in Value. London: The Falmer Press. İşcan, C. D. (2007). İlköğretim Düzeyinde Değerler Eğitimi Programının Etkililiği [The Efficiency of Primary School Values Education Curriculum]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. Karasar, N. (2007). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi (17. edition) [Scientific Research Method]. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları. Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and Value Orientation in the Theory of Action. In Parsons T & Shilds E (Eds.), Toward a General Theory of Action (388- 433). Cambridge: Harvard University Press Knafo, A. ; Schwartz, H. S. (2004). Identity Formation and Parent-Child Value Congruence in Adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 439-458. Kuşcu, R. (2009). Ortaöğretim Sosyal Alan Ders Kitaplarında Çağdaş Değerler [Contemporary Values in Social Domain Course Books of High Schools]. Niğde Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Niğde. Lamberta, G. C.(2004). A Values Education Intervention through Therapeıtic Recreation for Adolescants in a Psychiatric Setting (Doktora Tezi). Walden University, USA. Nesbitt, E.; Henderson, A. (2003). Religious Organisations in the UK and Values Education Programmes for Schools. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 24 ( 1), 75- 88. Pintrich, P. R. ; DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning. In Boekaerts M& Pintrich P & Zeidner M (Eds). Handbook of Self-Regulation (451- 502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Salovaara, H. (2005). Achievement Goals and Cognitive Learning Strategies in Dynamic Contexts of Learning. Finland: University Press. TDK (Türk Dil Kurumu). (2007). Güncel Türkçe Sözlük ve Yazım Kılavuzu Etkileşimli Yoğun Diski. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları. Üredi, I. (2005). Algilanan Anne Baba Tutumlarinin Ilköğretim 8. Sinif Öğrencilerinin Öz Düzenleyici Öğrenme Stratejileri ve Motivasyonel Inançlari Üzerindeki Etkisi [ The Effect of Perceived Parenting Styles on 8th Class Primary School Students’ SelfRegulated Learning Strategies and Motivational Beliefs] .Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul. Zimmerman, B. J. , Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23 (4), 614–628. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview. Educational Psychologist, 25 (1), 3- 17. -9- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE) Vol. 5(1), pp. 10-25, 1 April, 2015 Available online at http://mije.mevlana.edu.tr/ http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.61.5.1 According to the Opinions of Teachers and Students Active Citizenship Education in Elementary School 1, 2 Yücel Öksüz Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Education, Department of Primary Education, Division of Primary School Teaching, Samsun, Turkey Ceren Çevik Kansu3 Bayburt University, Faculty of Education, Department of Primary Education, Division of Primary School Teaching, Bayburt, Turkey Article history The aim of this research is to define the opinions of class teachers, Received: social studies teachers and 4th grade students in elementary school 14.04.2014 on active citizenship education. Qualitative method has been used Received in revised form: in this research. In Bayburt, the city chosen by purposeful sampling 04.03.2015 and based on volunteering principal, had 24 class teachers (Female=8, Male=16), 10 social studies teachers (Female=5, Accepted: 05.03.2015 Male=5) and 20 4th grade students in elementary school (Female=11, Male=9) studying in schools around Bayburt city Key words: center have taken part in this research. Semi-structured interview ClassTeacher, Social Studies Teacher, Elementary School 4th technique was used as a data gathering method. The data was Grade Student, Active obtained by two different semi-structured interview forms which Citizenship Education. contain 12 open ended questions for teachers and 5 open ended questions for students. The answers given by the students and teachers were resolved with the content analysis method. Various categories have been formed by coding the answers for each question. The frequencies of those formed categories were compared by converting them into tables. When analysis was done by comparing opinions of teachers and students, it drew the attention of the teachers on active citizenship education and developed more qualified methods by identifying the inadequacy in teaching of lessons. Introduction In this day and age, all nations are aiming at raising individuals who can be at peace with themselves and also be aware of their desires. They want to raise people who can express their feelings and opinions clearly, question judgments but at the same time respect the feelings and opinions of others, who have the culture to live together in peace and who can act right for the nation's sake. The education processes developed in order to make this aim come 1 This study was conducted with permission of Bayburt Directorate of National Education and was financially supported by OMU Scientific Research Council (Project ID: PYO.EGF.1904.13.007). We thank all organizers for supports. 2 This study is the improved version of the verbal declaration presented in 22nd Education Sciences Symposium. 3 Correspondence: cerencevik@bayburt.edu.tr Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 10-25, 1 April, 2015 true must be qualified in every way. While students are learning their rights, responsibilities and freedom, they must also learn the laws, equality, justice, democracy and nondiscrimination. Citizenship education is important because it gives students the necessary education and also teaches them the abilities that are needed to build a democratic nation. Democratic citizenship education supports the respect for different religions, cultures and opinions; therefore, it enables the understanding and sharing of different social values (MEB, 2012). The citizenship education in the Turkish education system conspiratorially started during the Tanzimat Reform Era. It was one of the reforms in education made during this era to put emphasis on citizenship education in order to build bridges between the citizens and the state. When it comes to the Republic Period, the main aim of the citizenship education is to raise individuals who love their country and know their citizenship rights and responsibilities. Education of human rights and democracy in Turkey has been involved in some courses such as Civics, Social Studies and recently Education of Citizenship and Human Rights. According to the Eurydice reports, the goals of citizenship education are: ‘(a) developing political literacy (knowledge of basic facts and understanding of key concepts); (b) acquiring critical thinking and analytical skills; (c) developing certain values, attitudes and behaviours (sense of respect, tolerance, solidarity, etc.); (d) encouraging active participation and engagement at school and community levels’ (Eurydice 2012: 27). Keser et al.’s (2011) study findings were compatible with EURYDICE Report (2005) – political literacy, critical thinking and development of certain attitudes, values, and active participation- on citizenship education, which yielded six themes, called the six blossoms of extra-curricular activities in citizenship education: namely, active citizenship perception; social accountability; intercultural awareness; awareness of democracy and human rights; thinking and research skills; and interaction and interpersonal skills. But, Guerin et al. (2013) studied four different categories that citizenship education has to cover. They are theoretically and empirically analysed: political knowledge, critical thinking, values, attitudes and behaviours, and active participation. Both studies are related to the dimensions of Hoskins et al. (2006) and Mascherini, together with Manca and Hoskins’s (2009) findings. Out of the these main dimensions, related with sub dimensions of the scale that was developed by ÇevikKansu and Öksüz (2014) , there are also many studies in literature which are related on to environmental sensitivity (Ferkany and Whyte 2013; Jagers et al. 2014; Jin and Shriar 2013; Tarrant and Lyons 2012), interest in activities (willing to social clubs, social activities, extracurricular activities etc) (Keser et al. 2011; Yaman 2011), social response (İnce 2012; Phillips 2011) and voluntary participation (Guerin 2013; Wood 2014). It is possible to say that nations that cannot raise active, claiming and responsible individuals are also deprived of dynamic powers. Dynamic power is only possible by an active education during the education and training life of individuals in which they should be taught to be conscious of the rights that they have just because they are humans with a very long genealogy. With such an education, people will want to use and defend their rights. They also learn to recognize why and how their rights should be defended. When considered from this point of view, the course of Social Studies in the last grades of elementary school takes care of this task. Although each step of education is vital, primary school has a distinct significance in terms of the populace it addresses. Primary school process, when the basic character and personality of the person’s is formed, which is a critical time period to have value, attitude and behavior -11- According to the Opinions of Teachers and Students Active Citizenship…Y. Öksüz & C. Çevik Kansu gained for the individual (Bacanli, 2002; Oktay, 2007). Owing to the fact that the foundation stones of citizenship education are laid in primary school, therefore primary school is regarded as an important fracture point in terms of citizenship education (Ersoy, 2007). Aim of the Study The aim of this study is to present the opinions of students and teachers on active citizenship education. Method The qualitative research approach was used in this research. In qualitative researches, perceptions and events are presented in a reaslistic and totalitarian way in natural environment (Yıldırım and Şimşek, 2005). In this study this approach was preferred because it ensures the full participation of all the participants involved in the research. Research Staff The research staff was formed by 24 class teachers working in Bayburt, which is the city chosen by purposeful sampling and based on volunteering principal, (Female=8, Male=16), 10 Social Studies teachers (Female=5, Male=5) and 20 4th grade students in elementary school (Female=11, Male=9). Data Collection and Analysis Furthermore, a semi-structured interview method was used as the data collection method. A semi-structured interview form which contains 12 open ended questions based on expert opinion was developed by the researchers for the teachers to state their opinions on active citizenship and Active Citizenship Education. These interview forms have been analysed by specialists in their field. Besides, the teachers were asked to give some personal information in the interview form. The face to face interviews were carried out by using a tape recorder based on volunteering principal. After the interviews, the recorded data was converted into text. The answers of the teachers were analysed by the content analysis method. Various categories were formed by coding the answers for each question. The frequencies of those formed categories are presented under the findings title by tabulation converting them into tables. Findings and Comments The collected data were categorised into 3 different groups which include; class teachers, Social Studies teachers and 4th grade students in elementary school. The findings as a result of the analysis made on the questions in semi-structured interview form are presented in tables. 1. Opinions of Teachers and Students on the Features that an Active Citizen Should Have The answers of the teacher to the question “What does the concept of citizenship mean to you?” and the frequency distribution are shown in Table 1. -12- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 10-25, 1 April, 2015 Table 1. Opinions of teachers and students on the features that an active citizen should have and the frequency distribution 1. 2. 3. Citizenship and Consciousness of Personal Skills (14) Class Teachers Human Rights (22) Responsibility (14) Citizenship and Consciousness of Environmental Social Studies Human Rights (7) Responsibility (2) Consciousness (1) Teachers th Consciousness of Environmental 4 Grade Students in Properties (20) Responsibility (13) Consciousness (12) Elementary School Teachers and students displayed more than one variable features in their replies about the features of active citizenship. Teachers named A. K., S. N., Ü., A. and Y. have defined an active citizen as a person who know his/her rights and uses them. The teacher named A. K. has defined an active citizen as “An active citizen is a person who knows his rights and uses them” (26). The teacher named M. stated his opinions on this subject as “Active citizenship is to know the responsibility of the state and the nation and to pull one's weight” (32). Teacher A. describes “An active citizen should respect the laws and know the rules and apply them in his/her daily life” (8). Generally, students expressed their opinions with the examples of being respectful in friendship relations and relationships with adults, by being tolerant and being kind hearted. 2. Opinions of the Teachers and Students on the Sufficiency of Social Studies Courses in Gathering Active Citizenship Features The answers of the teacher to the question “According to you, is the content of Social Studies Course for 4th grade in elementary school sufficient in gathering “active citizenship” features? If there is any, what is deficient?” and frequency distribution are shown in Table 2. Table 2. Opinions of teachers on sufficiency of social studies courses in gathering active citizenship features and frequency distribution Sufficiency of Social Studies Courses in f (Class Teachers) f (Social Gathering Active Citizenship Features Studies Teachers) The content mentions this subject and it 3 (1,15,36) 1 (12) is sufficient “I think the content is sufficient but what 1 (2) is important is how much we contribute to its development” “These subjects are mentioned in the 3 (1,36, 15) 1 (12) content” The content is sufficient but it must be 20 (2,4,6,7,8,16,17,19,20,23, 6 (3, 11, 25, 26, improved 24,28,29,31,32,33,34,35,37,38) 27, 30) “It is not updated” 3 (4,8,17) 1 (3) “The subjects’ compatibility with the 1 (4) 1 (3) environment is missing” “There is few activities for 7 (4,17,29,33,34,35,38) -13- According to the Opinions of Teachers and Students Active Citizenship…Y. Öksüz & C. Çevik Kansu implementation” “We cannot give space to the children for them to make up their own values.” “There is no connection between the units and subjects.” “Instead of detailed ones, subjects must be short but to the point.” “It is abstract and superficial.” “It must be objectified.” The content is not sufficient “It does not improve thinking skills.” “Students present different behaviors because of the effect of their environment.” “The education must be based on the love of country, nation and flag.” “Rights and responsibilities must be given.” “Some trips must be planned to see on site.” “The collaboration with parents is not enough.” “There are regional and environmental problems, that's why it is not supported.” “The problem is not with the content, because it is difficult for children to gather those features.” “It will be more sufficient if it is taught by teachers who were specially trained in this subject.” I do not have an opinion 1 (6) 1 (7) 1 (27) 1 (8) 3 (19,34,35) 2 (35,38) 5 (5,9,13,18,21) 2 (5,17) 1 (9) 2 (11, 30) 3 (13,16,23) 1 (18) 2 (19,22) 1 (20) 6 (22,24, 28,31,32,37) 2 (25, 26) 1 (33) 1 (34) 2 (14,10) Most of the teachers agree with the opinion that “the content is sufficient, but must be improved”. The teachers suggested that some deficiencies be removed. One of these deficiencies is increasing the number of activities so as to apply and update the content. Answers of the students to the question “Can you evaluate the Social Studies course according to active citizenship education?” and the frequency distribution are shown below in Table 3. Table 3. Opinions of the Students on Social Studies Course in relation with Active Citizenship and Frequency Distribution Evaluation f Sufficient 7 (2,4,5,7,9,10,11) Very nice course 4 (1,3,6,8) Insufficient 2 (28,29) Very helpful 1 (30) Very helpful course for cleaning 1 (6) It covers a half 1 (16) I do not have an opinion 4 (12, 13, 24, 27) -14- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 10-25, 1 April, 2015 According to the students, the social studies course is efficient at gathering active citizenship features. Nevertheless, when they were asked more detailed questions, their answers were not clear. This is because, they are not aware of which citizenship feature they gathered. The reason for this problem can be due to inadequate time for the lessons, time problem for character training, social skills training and counselling courses or as mention in the comments of teachers, the reason can be due to inadequate feasible and updateable activities in the content. 3. Opinions of Teachers on Planning Citizenship Education in Social Studies Course The answers of teachers to the question “How do you plan citizenship activities that you use in Social Studies course?” and frequency distribution are shown in Table 4. Table 4. Opinions of teachers on planning citizenship education in Social Studies course and frequency distribution Teachers' planning f (Class Teachers) f (Social Studies Citizenship Education in Teacher) Social Studies Course I directly apply the plan in the 14 (1,10,13,16,18,19,24, 2 (14,27) curriculum in teachers' guide 29,33,34,35,36,37,38) book. I apply the plan in the 1 (20) curriculum in teachers' guide book by making some changes. The changes made in the 14 8 curriculum in teachers' guide (2,4,5,6,7,8,9,17,21,22,23,28,31,32) (3,11,12,14,15,25,26, book. 30) When the opinions of teachers on planning citizenship education in Social Studies course were analyzed, their clear answers are “I make some changes” (20) and “I make some changes with my colleagues in the same branch” (14). According to the changes that they made on teachers' guide book, answers revolved around some statements such as “I make use of some current events (striking examples” (6), “I try to adapt what we learn to our environment (environmental features)” (6), “I try to let them be active students in the class and school” (5), “I consider the level, interests and requests of the student.” (4). 4. Opinions of Teachers and Students on the Activities for Citizenship Education in Social Studies Course The answers of teachers to the question “What kind of activities do you use for citizenship education in Social Studies course?” and the corresponding frequency distribution are shown in Table 5. Table 5. Opinions of Teachers and Students on the Activities for Citizenship Education in Social Studies Course and Frequency Distribution Activity No f (Class Teachers) f (Social Studies Teachers) f (Students) 1 Animating Sampling Activities in the book 2 Discussing Catechise, discussing Drama 3 Observation Narration Reading Text -15- According to the Opinions of Teachers and Students Active Citizenship…Y. Öksüz & C. Çevik Kansu 4 Conversation Power point presentation Writing While class teachers state that they use animating activities most, social studies teachers mostly use sample happenings. However, students indicate that they use the activities in books. 5. Opinions of Teachers on the Material They Use for Citizenship Education in Social Studies Course The answers of the teachers to the question “What kind of materials do you use for citizenship education in Social Studies course?” and frequency distribution are shown in Table 6. Tablo 6. Opinions of Teachers on the Material They Use for Citizenship Education in Social Studies Course and Frequency Distribution Materials f (Class f (Social Studies f (Students) Teachers) Teachers) Visual and Auditory 22 6 Materials Documents 2 Information 10 3 4 Technologies Mass Media 2 2 Guide People 2 Real Objects 13 1 Course Materials 25 (pencil, notebook, rubber etc.) From the above, it is seen that the teachers mostly use visual and auditory materials. However, the students consider the equipments that they use during the classes as materials, such as pencil, notebook, rubber etc. 6. Opinions of Teachers on the Problems They Face in Citizenship Education in Social Studies Course The answers of the teachers to the question “What kind of problems do you face with in citizenship education in Social Studies course?” and the corresponding frequency distribution are shown in Table 7. Table 7. Opinions of Teachers on the Problems They Face in Citizenship Education in Social Studies Course and Frequency Distribution Problems Teachers Face with in Citizenship f (Class Teacher) f (Social Studies Education in Social Studies Course Teacher) Curriculum 7 4 Subjects and activities in the curriculum are 4 (7,35,37,38) 2 (14,27) very abstract. The number of activities in the curriculum is too 1 (21) 3 (14,25,26) high (time problem). -16- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 10-25, 1 April, 2015 Insufficient materials that are suitable for the curriculum (especially visual materials) Citizenship activities in Social Studies course do not fit with citizenship activities in the schoos School and Education system Insufficient physical potentials of the school Lack of democracy Examination system Family Difference between what is taught in schools and in the house Cultural, socio-economical and educational level of parents Bad connection between school, student and family Student Deficiency in sense of responsibility 1 (19) 1 (5) 3 1 (19) 1 (33) 1 (28) 6 3 (8,31,34) 1 2 (32,34) 1 (15) 1 (3) 3 2 (3,14) 1 (10) 13 7 (13,16,17,18,20,29,38) Lack of respect for values 3 (23,24,37) Being prone to fight 2 (2,33) They are aware of their rights but they do not 1 (38) know their boundaries They do not listen to each other 1 (23) Subjects 5 Difficulties in applying for out-of-school 3 (4,5,6) activities Teachers cannot keep up with the time 2 (2,31) Teachers do not try enough 1 (4) Environment 6 Insufficient socio-economic potentials in 4 (4,7,9,33) environment Unfavorable climate conditions 1 (9) False beliefs in nation 1 (6) 2 1 (12) 1 (11) Class teachers said the cause of the problems include student (13), curriculum (7), family and environment (6), subjects (5), school or education system (3); while social studies teachers, blamed it on curriculum (4), family (3), student (2) and school and education system (1). 7. Opinions of Teacher on Their Suggestions for Active Citizenship Education in Social Studies Course The answers of the teachers to the question “What are your suggestions for better citizenship education in Social Studies course?” and frequency distribution are shown in Table 8. Table 8. Opinions of Teacher on Their Suggestions for Active Citizenship Education in Social Studies Course and Frequency Distribution Solution Suggestions of Teachers f (Class Teachers) f (Social -17- According to the Opinions of Teachers and Students Active Citizenship…Y. Öksüz & C. Çevik Kansu for the Problems They Face in Citizenship Education in Social Studies Course Curriculum Culture of democracy must be taught in a step by step manner in each grade Citizenship education must be given in every course Curriculum must contain trips and observations There must be more concrete activities, as well as animating and applied activities There must be more in touch with the world of children There must be more activities for increasing assertiveness and selfconfidence in children It should not be totally based on games. Connection between lessons and units must be better Guide books should not be abstract and superficial It must fit into the emotional world of children It must be eased and essential precautions must be taken to apply the activities There must be more activities based on games School and Education System All the clubs must work in connection with an association or foundation The ones in higher positions must work along with the one in lower positions We must overcome the fear culture Respect for differences must be adopted Reports prepared at the end of the year must be taken into consideration The concept of being a nation must be emphasized instead of individualism Free activity course must be included Career days must be organized Materials that are suitable for 4th grade level must be developed Computer software must be used Studies Teachers) 3 (2,16,34) 1 (3) 1 (3) 6 (4,8,21,22,35,36) 2 (14,27) 12 (4,9,17,19,21,24,28,31,34,35,37,38) 2 (26,27) 6 (7,9,28,31,34,37) 2 (8,32) 1 (10) 1 (15) 3 (33,37) 1 (15) 1 (17) 1 (19) 1 (23) 1 (2) 1 (16) 3 (16,32,34) 1 (16) 1 (17) 1 (20) 2 (24,35) 1 (27) 1 (30) 1 (25) -18- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 10-25, 1 April, 2015 Family Family must support the education in the school There must be meetings and seminars about this for parents The child must be appreciated Family and nation must be supervised together respectively Teacher The feeling of possession must be improved Planning must be made with children The child must be appreciated Class teachers must be trained in this subject The effect of media on children must be considered Environment Environment must support the education in the school People with various professions must be invited to the school Child must be appreciated 1 (5) 1 (12) 6 (5,6,13,29,34,38) 2 (11,12) 1 (12) 1 (11) 1 (1) 1 (12) 2 (6,35) 1 (12) 1 (30) 1 (38) 1 (5) 1 (12) 2 (8,22) 2 (14,27) 1 (12) Mostly, teachers suggest that there should be concentration on applied activities and organizing trips and observation activities for improving the curriculum. For improving school and education system, they have given suggestions like organizing career days, coming over the fear culture, and the involvement of free activity course as well. For family problems, suggestions are generally focused on giving seminars, organizing meeting for the parents. 8. Ideas of Students for Improving Social Studies Course to be an Active Citizen The answers of students to the question “What are your ideas and suggestions for you to gain active citizenship features?” and the corresponding frequency distribution are shown in Table 9. Table 9. Ideas of Students for Improving Social Studies Course to be an Active Citizen and Frequency Distribution Suggestions f Trips can be helpful 7 (4,8,10,11,16,19,28) Theater performances can be helpful 5 (9,15,18,19,30) Communication with family must be provided 2 (7,22) A picnic can be organized to keep the environment clean. 2 (14,23) Activities must be supported with games 2 (22,27) There must be projection 2 (23,25) It can be helpful to have some texts book on how to behave well to 1 (1) our friends There can be teacher or student relations between classes (the ones 1 (2) who cannot get along well with the others) -19- According to the Opinions of Teachers and Students Active Citizenship…Y. Öksüz & C. Çevik Kansu I would like to have this education as a course There can be more subjects More activities like collecting old batteries can be helpful I want to be a member of library Teacher can punish naughty students Watching a video can be helpful. I would like the books to open on their own Every week a group can collect the rubbish in the school. I want some cameras to be placed in toilets We can study visually in computer rooms. To form a ensemble Animating outside can be helpful To go to the cinema Collecting some money to improve the materials in the school There must be drawing and painting activities To make projects with clubs (Trips, career days) 1 (3) 1 (5) 1 (6) 1 (12) 1 (12) 1 (15) 1 (15) 1 (16) 1 (16) 1 (16) 1 (17) 1 (23) 1 (24) 1 (26) 1 (29) 1 (30) The answers of students on active citizenship education in Social Studies class, disclosed that they focus more on activities like trips, theater performances, etc. The cause of this situation can be the difficulties that teachers face when organizing such activities which require a long procedure. Results and Conclusion Qualitative research methods has been used by many researchers to understand the opinions and feelings of teachers and student on citizenship education (Adayemi, Boikhutso and Moffat, 2003; Arıkan, 2002; Browne, 2001; Davies and Evans, 2003; Davies, Gregory and Riley, 1999; Dunkin, Welch, Merritt, Phillips and Cranen, 1998; Güven, 2002; Özbek, 2004; Pederson and Cogan, 2003; Pang and Gibson, 2001; Shelly, 1996). But in this study, opinions of the classroom teachers and social studies teachers about active citizen and active citizenship education in social studies classes were jointly investigated with the student’s. According to the teachers, an active citizen should know and should use the citizenship and human rights very well. Whereas, according to the students, an active citizen should behave according to the rules of good manners. Moreover, both students and teacher stated that individuals must have a sense of responsibility and environmental consciousness in order to be active citizens. Teachers emphasized on the feature of active citizen “who know his/her rights and responsibilities” during the interview. This most repeated opinion coincides with the studies of Adayemi et al. (2003), Ersoy (2007) and, Pang and Gibson (2001). The active citizenship term emphasized influence in area of the individuals and citizen participation with active or effective terms in literature (Hoskins ve Mascherini, 2009). When opinions of the teachers and students on sufficiency of social studies courses in gathering active citizenship features were investigated; teachers state that the entire course includes information about citizenship and human rights education, yet, the Social Studies course is more important in this aspect (Dynneson and Gross, 1982; Ersoy, 2007; Grand and Vansledrigt, 1996; Hartoonian, 1985). Teachers lay much emphasis on the fact that even though the Social Studies course is sufficient in content, it must also be improved. According to the students, the Social Studies course is sufficient in the aspect of developing a sense of citizenship. However, when a deeper question is asked, the answers that they give show that -20- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 10-25, 1 April, 2015 the acquisition has not reached to the desired level. In literature studies, the social studies course showed that there is an insufficient achievement of active citizenship education which supports the results (Arslan, 2014; Ersoy, 2014). However, there are many records that show the contrary of these results in the literature. (Semenderoğlu ve Gülersoy, 2005; Gömleksiz ve Kan, 2007; Demir, 2008; Ersoy ve Kaya, 2008; Vural, 2008; Çetin, 2009; Ayva, 2010) When the opinions of teachers on planning citizenship education in social studies course were investigated; the plans of teachers on citizenship education in Social Studies course was found to be implemented by a book called teachers' guide book together with some changes. Also, only half of the class teachers seem to use the teachers' guide book without any change. This finding coincided with the studies of Blake, Brandy and Sanchez (2003), Browne (2001), Ersoy (2007) and Arslan (2014). Nevertheless, the teachers were found to be insufficient to teach human rights and citizenship education to the students (Ülger ve Yel, 2013). When the opinions of teachers and students on the activities for citizenship education in social studies course were investigated; the result disclosed that teachers use in-class activities to give citizenship education. They even applied student activities that are contained in books. Lastly, there are not enough out-of-school activities which give children an opportunity to work in public. This finding coincides with the studies of Çengelci (2013), Ülger (2013), Ersoy (2007), Mckay (1996), Pederson and Cogan (2003) ve Wilkins (2003). Yet, in other studies in the literature, the importance of out-of-school activities has been emphasized (Adayemi et al, 2003; Potter, 2002). When the opinions of teachers on the materials they use for citizenship education in the social studies course were investigated; the outcome showed that citizenship education materials are generally made of visual and auditory materials. This finding coincides with the studies of Ersoy (2007), Gündoğdu (2001), Pederson and Cogan (2000) and, Torney-Purta and Vermeer (2004). The students also do make use of instruments and equipments which belong to the course with their teachers during the class activities. This means that the students were not actively involved in the course or methods and techniques used by the teachers because they were not supported with sufficient instruments and equipments. When the opinions of teachers on the problems they face in citizenship education in social studies course were investigated; teachers seem to face some problems while teaching active citizenship in Social Studies course. The problems that teachers face have been classified into six titles which include; student, curriculum, family, environment, school and education system. These results were synonymous with the problems that happened in the literature (Aykaç ve Başar, 2005; Kıvanç, 2005; Yaşar, 2005; Ersoy, 2006; Aydın, 2007; Çetin, 2007; Ersoy, 2007; Çelik, 2009; Ersoy, 2009; Aydeniz, 2010; Güven, 2010; Ersoy, 2014). When opinions of the teachers on their suggestions for active citizenship education in social studies course were investigated; they gave some suggestions on how to tackle the problems that they face in each category. Suggestions solve the problems in the curriculum, the school and education system in a better way. When the ideas of students on improving social studies course for the purpose of making active citizen were investigated; some suggestions on how to improve the curriculum came up. They include; organization of trips, performing of theatre plays, communication with family and activities in order to collaborate with the environment. -21- According to the Opinions of Teachers and Students Active Citizenship…Y. Öksüz & C. Çevik Kansu Considering this study, the suggestions can be stated: Active citizen activities may enhance the cooperation of civil associations with the student’s parents at schools. The teachers that are going to teach active citizen terms may plan the class conditions together with civil associations. Awareness studies on active citizen day may be of great help to teachers, society, students and their parents. The students may assess active citizen education practice through their teachers. A study that includes the teacher’s active citizen education in private and public schools should be conducted. Projects, like the Comenius projects, with different countries, particularly countries that have a good level of active citizen education can be organized as well as a comparable education study. Programmes for active citizenship education can be developed and can be tested with experimental studies on different classes and courses at primary school. References Adeyemi, M. B., Boikhutso, K. & Moffat, P. (2003). Teaching and learning of citizenship education at junior secondary level in Botswana. Pastoral Care Education, 21(2), 3541. Arıkan, F. (2002). Vatandaşlık ve insane hakları eğitimi dersi eğitim programının öğretmen görüşleri doğrultusunda değerlendirilmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sakarya. Arslan, S. (2014). Çokkültürlü toplumlarda vatandaşlık eğitimine yönelik öğretmen ve öğrenci düşüncelerinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul. Aydeniz, D. (2010). İlköğretim 4. 5. Sınıf Sosyal Bilgiler Dersinin İnsan Hakları ve Demokrasi Eğitimindeki İşevselliği. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sakarya. Aydin, S. (2007). İlköğretim 4. ve 5. Sınıf Yeni (2004) Sosyal Bilgiler Müfredatının Öğretmen Görüşlerine Göre Değerlendirilmesi (Trabzon İli Örneği). Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Sakarya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sakarya. Aykaç, N. & Başar, E. (2005). İlköğretim Sosyal Bilgiler Dersi Eğitim Programının Değerlendirilmesi. Eğitimde Yansımalar: VIII. Yeni İlköğretim Programlarını Değerlendirme Sempozyumu Bildirisi, 14-16 Kasım, Erciyes Üniversitesi Sabancı Kültür Sitesi, Kayseri, 343-361. Ayva, Ö. (2010). Sosyal bilgiler dersi öğrenme öğretme süreci ile ilgili öğrenci görüşleri. International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications. 11-13 November 2010. Antalya-Türkiye. 276-282. Bacanlı, H. (2002). Gelişim ve öğrenme. Ankara: Nobel yayınları. Blake, S. Brady, T. & Sanchez, S. (2003). Enculturation of democratic principles in the young: A vision of equity education in public schools. Educational Research Quarterly, 28(1), 48-59. Browne, W. P. (2001). Citizenship Education: Policy and Practice in the Elementary Grades. The Social Studies, 94(2), 149-159. Çelik, H. (2009). Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretmenlerinin Vatandaşlık Eğtiminin Bugünkü Durumu ve Geleceğine İlişkin Görüşleri. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul. -22- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 10-25, 1 April, 2015 Çengelci, T. (2013). Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretmenlerinin Sınıf Dışı Öğrenmeye İlişkin Görüşleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(3), 1823-1841. Çetin, F. (2007). İlköğretim 4.Sınıf Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretim Programının Öğretmen Görüşleri Doğrultusunda Değerlendirilmesi (Meram İlçesi Örneği). Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya. Çetin, B. (2009). Yeni ilköğretim programı (2005) uygulamaları hakkında 4. Ve 5. Sınıf öğrencilerinin görüşleri. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 17(2), 487-502. Çevik-Kansu, C. & Öksüz, Y. (2014). Developing an Active Citizenship Scale for the Fourth Grade Primary School Students. The Anthropologist, 18(3), 969-980. Davies, I. & Evans, M. (2003). Encouraging active citizenship. Educational Review, 54(1), 69-78. Davies, I., Gregory, I. & Riley, S. C. (1999). Good citizenship and educational provision. London: U.K: Routledge Falmer. Demir, M. K. (2008). 2005 sosyal bilgiler öğretim programının öğrencilerin eleştirel düşünme becerilerine etkisi. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 32, 113-126. Dunkin, M. J., Welch, A., Merritt, A., Phillips, R. & Cranen, R. (1998). Teachers’ explanations of classroom events: Knowledge and beliefs about teaching civic and citizenship. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(2), 141-151. Dynneson, T. L. & Gross, R. E. (1982). Citizenship education the social studies: Which is which?. Social Studies, 73(5), 229-234. Ersoy, A. F. (2006). Hayat Bilgisi ve Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretim Programları’nın etkili vatandaşlık eğitimi açısından değerlendirilmesi. Ulusal Sınıf Öğretmenliği Kongresi’nde sunulan bildiri, Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi, İlköğretim Bölümü Sınıf Öğretmenliği Ana Bilim Dalı Bildiri Kitabı. 2.Cilt. Ankara: Kök Yayıncılık. Ersoy, A. F. (2007). Sosyal Bilgiler Dersinde Öğretmenlerin Etkili Vatandaşlık Eğitimi Uygulamalarına İlişkin Görüşleri. Doktora Tezi. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir. Ersoy, A. F. (2014). Active and democratic citizenship education and its challenges in social studies classroom. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 55, 1-20. Ersoy, A. F. & Kaya, E. (2008). Sınıf öğretmenlerine göre öğrencilerin sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretim programına (2004) ilişkin yaklaşımları. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(1), 285-300. Ersoy, F. G. (2009). Yeni İlköğretim Sosyal Bilgiler Programının Uygulanması ile ilgili Değerlendirmeler (Konya İli Örneği). Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya. EURYDICE (2005). Citizenship Education at School in Europe, European Commission (Directorate-General for Education and Culture). Brüssel. Retrieved from http:// eacea.ec.europa.eu/ressources/eurydice/pdf/0_integral/055EN.pdf EURYDICE (2012). Citizenship Education at School in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice European Unit. Ferkany, M. & Whyte, K. P. (2013). The compability of liberalism and mandatory environmental education. Theory and Research in Education, 11(1), 5-21. Gömleksiz, M. N. & Kan, A. Ü. (2007). Yeni sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretim programının araştırma, iletişim ve Türkçe’yi doğru, etkili ve güzel kullanma becerilerini kazandırmadaki etkililik düzeyine ilişkin öğrenci görüşleri (Diyarbakır ili örneği). Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(2), 135-162. Guerin, L.J.F., van der Ploeg, P.A. & Sins, P.H.M. (2013). Citizenship education: The feasibility of a participative approach. Educational Research, 55(4), 427-440. -23- According to the Opinions of Teachers and Students Active Citizenship…Y. Öksüz & C. Çevik Kansu Grand, S. G. & Vansledrigt, B. A. (1996). The dubious connections: Citizenship education and the social studies. Social Studies, 87(2), 56-60. Gündoğdu, K. (2001). Bir durum çalışması: ABD’de demokrasi kavram ve kültürünün ilköğretim düzeyinde öğretilmesine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. X. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi’nde sunulan bildiri, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Bolu. II. Cilt, (1223-1232). Güven, S. (2002). İlköğretim 7. ve 8. sınıflarda okutulmakta olan vatandaşlık ve insane hakları dersini veren öğretmenlerin nitelikleri ve derste karşılaştıkları problemler. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Atatürk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Erzurum. Güven, S. (2010). İlköğretim birinci kademede vatandaşlık eğitimi üzerine bir durum çalışması. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. Hartoonian, H. M. (1985). The social studies: foundation for citizenship education in our democratic republic. Social Studies, 76(1), 5-8. HOSKINS, Bryony; Jesinghaus J.; Mascherini, M.; Munda, G.; Nardo, M.; Saisana, M.; Van Nijlen, D.; Vidoni, D. & Villalba, E., 2006, Measuring Active Citizenship in Europe, Ispra: European Commission Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen EUR 22530 EN. Hoskins, B. L. & Mascherini, M. (2009). Measuring active citizenship through the development of a composite indicator. Soc Indic Res, 90, 459-488. İnce, B. (2012). Citizenship Education in Turkey: Inclusive or Exclusive. Oxford Review Of Education, 38(2), 115- 131. Jagers, S. C., Martinsson, J. & Matti, S. (2014). Ecological citizenship: A driver of proenvironmental behaviour?. Environmental Politics, 23(3), 434-453. Jin, M. H. & Shriar, A. J. (2013). Linking environmental citizenship and civic engagement to public trust and environmental sacrifice in the Asian context. Environmental Policy and Governance, 23(4), 259-273. Keser, F., Akar, H. & Yıldırım, A. (2011). The role of extracurricular activities in active citizenship education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(6), 809-837. Kivanç, Ö. (2005). İlköğretim insan hakları eğitimi sürecinin Avrupa Konseyi insan hakları eğitimi çerçevesinde öğretmenler tarafından değerlendirilmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana. Mascherini, M., Manca, A. R., Hoskins, B., Hingel, A. & Saltelli, A. (2009). “The Characterization of Active Citizenship in Europe”, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen. Retrieved fromhttp://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/.../reqno_jrc54065_the_characterization_of_a ctive_citizenship_in_europe%5B1%5D.pdf Mckay, R. (1996). Whole social studies: Finding the surest way to effective citizenship. Canadian Social Studies, 30, 108-207. MEB (2012). İlköğretim Vatandaşlık ve Demokrasi Eğitimi Öğretmen Kılavuz Kitabı 8. Ankara: Saray Matbaacılık. Özbek, R. (2004). Vatandaşlık ve insan hakları eğitimi amaçlarının gerçekleşme düzeyine ilişkin öğretmen öğrenci tutumlarının değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası Demokrasi Eğitimi Sempozyumu’nda sunulan bildiri, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Yayınları, Çanakkale, 397-412. Pang, O. V. & Gibson, R. (2001). Concept of democracy and citizenship: View of African American teachers. The Social Studies, 92(6), 260-266. Pederson, P. V. & Cogan, J. J. (2003). Civic education pedagogy and assessment in the pasific rim: Six cases. International Journal of Social Education, 17(1), 16-30. -24- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 10-25, 1 April, 2015 Phillips, L. (2011). Possibilities and Quandaries for Young Children’s Active Citizenship. Early Education and Development, 22(5), 778-794. Potter, J. (2002). Active citizenship in schools. London: Kogan Page. Oktay, A. (2007). (Ed.) Eğitim kavramı ve eğitim düşüncesinin tarihsel gelişimi. Eğitim bilimine giriş içinde. Ankara: Pegema yayınları. Semenderoğlu, A. & Gülersoy, A. E. (2005). Eski ve Yeni 4-5. Sınıf Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretim Programlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18, 141-152. Shelly, G. (1996). Perceptions of characteristics of good citizenship by secondary public school teachers in the state of Washington. Doctoral dissertation. Seattle Pacific University, United States, Washington, (AAT 9813895). Tarrant, M. & Lyons, K. (2012). The effect of short term educational travel programs on environmental citizenship. Environmental Education Research, 18(3), 403-416. Torney-Purta, J. & Lopez, S. W. (2006). Developing Citizenship Competencies from Kindergarten Through Grade 12: A Background Paper for Policymakers and Educators. Denver: Education Commission of the States. Ülger, M. (2013). İnsan Hakları ve Vatandaşlık Eğitimi Ara Disiplin Alanı Uygulamasının Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretmenlerinin Görüşleri Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi. Turkish Journal of Education, 2(3), 14-29. Ülger, M. & Yel, S. (2013). Ara Disiplin Olarak İnsan Hakları ve Vatandaşlık Eğitimi ile ilgili İlköğretim Öğretmenlerinin Yeterlik Algıları. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(10), 19-32. Vural, C. T. (2008). Sosyal Bilgiler öğretiminde yaratıcı düşünme: Yeni ilköğretim programı beşinci sınıf sosyal bilgiler öğretiminde kullanılan etkinliklerin yaratıcılığı geliştirmesi açısından değerlendirilmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana. Wilkins, C. (2003). Teachers and young citizens: Teacher talk about their role as social educators. Westminster Studies in Education, 26(1), 63-75. Wood, B. E. (2014). Participatory capital: Bourdeu and citizenship education in diverse school communities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(4), 578-597. Yaman, E, (2011). Rekreasyon bağlamında öğrenci algılarına göre sosyal kulüplerin işlevselliği. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(3), 35-48. Yaşar, Ş. (2005). “Sosyal Bilgiler Programı ve Öğretimi”, Eğitimde Yansımalar: VIII- Yeni İlköğretim Programlarını Değerlendirme Sempozyumu, 14-16 Kasım 2005 Erciyes Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi-Kayseri, Tekışık Eğitim Araştırma Geliştirme Vakfı Yayınları, Ankara: Sim Matbaası, 329-342. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. 5.baskı. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi. -25- M evlana International Journal of Education (M IJE) Vol. 5(1), pp. 26-44, 1 April, 2015 Available online at http://mije.mevlana.edu.tr/ http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.15.07.5.1 The View of Teachers of First Graders Regarding Scheduling the Age of Starting School to an Earlier Time Huseyin Anilan1 Eskisehir Osmangazi University, College of Education, Department of Classroom Teacher, Eskisehir/TURKEY Yalcin Bay2 Eskisehir Osmangazi University, College of Education, Department of Early Childhood Education, Eskisehir /TURKEY Article history The aim of the study is to present the reflections of scheduling the Received: age of starting school to an earlier time related to the experiences 15.01.2014 inside and outside the classroom, students, problems and solutions Received in revised form: experienced in teaching-learning process according to the view of 07.03.2015 teachers of first graders. The study is a collective case study. Work group was determined according to measurement sampling among Accepted: 09.03.2015 purposive sampling methods in qualitative research approaches. 14 primary school teachers working at public primary schools in Key words: spring term in 2012-2013 educational term around Turkey attended Primary Education, First Class, the research. The data of the study were collected via interview and Transitions between Levels, Compulsory Education observation forms developed by the researchers. Descriptive analysis technique was used for the analysis of the data. When analyzing the data, Elo and Kyngas’s (2007) preparation, organization and reporting phases were taken into consideration. To validate the study, the findings were presented detachedly and quotations were taken directly from attendants’ statements. In order to provide the reliability of the research, we followed the way Stemler (2001) called repeatability or single coder reliability. In this research, the reliability was provided by considering the percentage of both single coder and two coders. In the research, we gained such findings that teachers disapprove of scheduling the age of starting school to an earlier time; they think that this affect teaching-learning process negatively; students 69-month-old or younger cannot discharge self-care skills because of their physical inability; and this hampers conduction of Phoneme Based Sentence Method. Introduction People find themselves in social life from the time they are born. The social life is limited with immediate environment at first; however, it develops and starts to cover further environment in later periods. After a while, school time, a new and effective socializing 1 2 Dr. Assoc., Correspondence: anilan.huseyin@gmail.com Dr. Assoc., Correspondence: yalcinbay73@gmail.com Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 26-44, 1 April, 2015 process, starts. School time is the period that children get out from family environment and involve in exterior environment and social life (Yörükoğlu, 2003). The most important factor determining schooling of an individual in this period is the structure of the educational system. Depending on the structure of educational system, school time starts with preschool education (compulsory or optional) or compulsory primary school. In turkey, children start school with preschool education depending on their parents’ choice or compulsory primary school. In parallel with this situation, children’s starting to primary school first grade can be directly without preschool education or – at the end of preschool education – attending first grade. Starting to primary school which forms the first step of formal education and forms the base of later educational institutions and which is compulsory in many countries is one of the most important cornerstones in a child’s life. Because primary school means, for many children, leaving home for the first time, spending most of the day with new friends and adults, attending activities with strict rules for the first time, being disciplined, obeying the teacher’s directions, and especially learning reading, writing and arithmetic (Özarslan and Gündüz, 2013). In this sense, primary school first grade is quite important in terms of gaining basic skills such as reading, writing and arithmetic and having positive attitudes towards reading in future (Oktay and Unutkan, 2003). Beside primary school which is of great importance in educational and social life of an individual, elementary school – first step of primary school – and age to start elementary school are also of great importance. In Turkey, with the amendment numbered 6287 on March 30, 2012 in Primary Education and Training Law numbered 222 dated January 05, 1961, formal education which was applied as 5+3+3 till 1997 and 8+3 and then 8+4 was constructed as 4+4+4 with the last amendment and made compulsory in Turkish National Educational System (Gözütok et al., 2013). With the amendment in 7 th article of Ministry of National Education Regulations of Primary School Institutions, children who are 66 months old start school mandatorily; children who are 60 – 66 months old start school according to their parents’ wish. In other words, with the new regulations, first step of primary education was reduced to 4 years from 5 years and named as elementary school. Moreover, age to start compulsory elementary school was reduced to age 5 (60 months) from age 6 (72 months). Age to start compulsory education is between 3 and 7 in the world. Whereas age to start compulsory education is 6 in many countries, it is under 6 in 38 countries. Compulsory education starts at the age of 7 in 44 countries, at the age of 6 in 113 countries, at the age of 5 in 33 countries at the age of 4 in 4 countries and at the age of 3 in one countries. Age to start compulsory education is 6 in Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Estonia, France, Italy, Austria, Romania, Portugal, Poland, USA, Australia, Korea, and Japan. It starts at the age of 7 in Bulgaria, Finland and Sweden; at the age of 5 in Hungary, the Netherlands and Malta; and 4 or 5 in England (UNESCO, 2011, as cited by Güven 2012). The law amendment reducing the age to start compulsory primary education from 6 age (72 months) to 5 age (60 months) generated discussions in media organs and public, certain nongovernmental organizations, educational unions and academic environments (Ankara University, 2012; Boğaziçi University, 2012; Gür at al., 2012; Eğitim Sen, 2012; Eğitim İş, 2012; ERG, 2012; Güneş, 2013; Güven, 2012; Müftüoğlu, 2012; METU, 2012; Turk Eğitim Sen, 2012; Turkish Doctors’ Union, 2012). However, the topics of the discussions focus on school maturity and development features of the individuals and social structure. It is ignored what classroom teachers, who will involve in teaching – learning processes with these -27- The View of Teachers of First Graders Regarding Scheduling…H. Anilan & Y. Bay students, will do in these processes, how they behave, how they solve the problems. It is a fact that whether classroom teachers have enough interest, information, skills, and educational processes about the development of the children in those ages is affective in reaching true judgements (Kesicioğlu, 2013). Backdating the age to start primary education affects the classroom teacher who is one of the most important shareholders of the process. Classroom teachers should deal with development properties of the children besides teaching early reading, writing, and arithmetic. Moreover, it should not be ignored that teaching success of reading and writing depends on teachers; hence, it is important for teachers to follow the developments in the field, update their information and know the methods effectively in terms of applications (Güneş, 2013). For this reason, it will be useful to analyze the experiences of classroom teachers who are to continue teaching- learning processes with the students who are in this age due to law amendment. The aim of the study is to present reflections about effects of backdating of the age to start primary school on experiences in and out of classroom, students, problems and solutions in teaching- learning process according to elementary school first grade teachers. Problem Sentence According to primary school first grade teachers, how does backdating of the age to start primary school reflect on teaching- learning processes? Sub-problems What do teachers think about backdating of the age to start elementary school? How does backdating of the age to start elementary school effect teaching process of early reading and writing? What kinds of problems do students who start school when they are 69 months old or younger experience? What kinds of differences are there between the students who are 69 months old or younger and older than them sharing the same educational program? How are the self-care skills of the students who are 69 months old and younger? Do classroom teacher have problems in early reading and writing process due to the age of the students? How does backdating of the age to start school affect the application process of Phoneme Based Sentence Method? Are there any differences between the students who are 69 months old or younger and much older ones in terms of basic language skills? -28- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 26-44, 1 April, 2015 Method Research Design Aiming to identify how backdating of the age to start elementary school reflect on teaching learning processes according to classroom teachers’ opinions, the study is a holistic single case study conducted with qualitative method. Qualitative research is the research that qualitative data collecting tools such as observation, interview and document analysis are used; a qualitative process is followed in order to present the perceptions and events in natural environment in a holistic manner (Yıldırım and Şimşek, 2013). Qualitative researches are the researches that are conducted to evaluate a situation deeply and detailed (Yin, 2003; Woodside, 2010). The most fundamental aspect of qualitative researches is to analyze one or more situations deeply. In other words, factors about a situation (environment, individuals, events, processes etc.) are studied in a holistic manner and focus is on how they affect the situation and how they are affected by the situation (Yıldırım and Şimşek, 2013). We employ qualitative method holistic single case study because it is aimed to identify how the backdating of the age to start elementary school affects teaching-learning processes and how students are affected from the situation. Work Group The work group of the study was determined according to criterion sampling a kind of purposive sampling methods in qualitative research approach (Yıldırım and Şimşek, 2013). In the selection of the teachers in work group, we take some criteria into consideration such as having at least 10 years’ experience in the profession, educating the first grade at least twice, having students younger than 69 months old in the classroom. 14 classroom teachers meeting these criteria, working at public schools in Turkey in 2012-2013 educational years attended the study. Qualitative descriptive approach requires describing the attendants in workgroup in detail (Creswell, 2012). Personal characteristics of the teachers attending to the study are given in Table 1. Gender is an identifying factor in choosing a profession and continuing a profession. As seen in Table 1, only two of the teachers attending to the study are male, the others are female. The result is in fact an indicator of the perception in the society “ teaching is a profession for women” (Akpınar, Yıldız and Ergin, 2006; Çermik, Doğan and Şahin, 2010; Ekiz, 2006). Work experience is about the time of working as teacher professionally. In teaching, teachers who have worked for 5 years or more are accepted as “experienced”. Experience in teaching is more important than experience in other professions because each teaching-learning process is a new experience for a teacher. Each experience guides teacher in planning, application and evaluation of new teaching-learning processes. So, the teachers attending the study are thought as “experienced” and they are expected to reflect their experience on teachinglearning process positively. Table 1. Personal Characteristics of the Teachers Attending the Study Number T1 T2 Gender Work Experience Age F F 18 17 41 40 The number of Educating 1 st Grade 6 5 -29- Number of Students 23 22 Number of the students aged 69 months or younger 2 3 The View of Teachers of First Graders Regarding Scheduling…H. Anilan & Y. Bay T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T11 T12 T13 T14 M F F M F F F F F F F F 17 12 12 26 34 16 23 18 21 20 16 12 39 32 34 47 56 38 45 40 44 42 37 34 3 5 5 10 6 6 9 5 6 5 5 3 25 20 22 27 26 29 27 21 22 24 25 27 8 3 3 3 4 11 9 3 4 2 2 4 Age is accepted as a sign of maturity in teaching. It is assumed that experience of individual increases with their age. So, that the teachers are in a period which can be described as “young maturity” is important in terms of their performance in teaching-learning processes. Because when the teachers grow older, they become more dedicated to their school (Celep et al., 2004). That the dedication of the teachers increase is a positive situation effecting time and effort for educational activities. However, we know that the tendency to authoritarian control (Emir and Kanlı, 2009), professional depersonalization and emotional exhaustion increase with age; and these kinds of teachers are mostly in elementary schools (Yazıcı, 2009). It is not expected that excessive authoritarian tendency or professional depersonalization and emotional exhaustion have positive effects on teaching-learning process. Hence, the age of the teachers attending the study does not have negative effects on teaching- learning process. The basic duty expected from a first grade teacher is to teach students how to read and write. But teaching early reading and writing is not easy by its nature; moreover there are many factors that make it more difficult. The early reading-writing experience of the teacher is one of these factors. In general, individuals doing the same thing again and again have more chance to be successful in each repetition. They are getting proficiency in their profession. It is seen that the teachers attending the study are experienced and expert in their profession. The number of the students in a classroom is one of the most important factors affecting teaching-learning process in terms of communication, classroom management, dealing with individual differences. Johnson (2002) describes the classroom having 20 or less students as small, and describes classrooms having at least 31 students as big (cited by, Güçlü, 2002). We can say that the numbers of the classrooms in our study are appropriate in terms of teachinglearning process. It is known that the communication between teacher and students is much in the classrooms having less students (Blatchford, Bassett and Brown, 2005; Yaman 2010). Especially, in early reading and writing process having more students is not desired by the teacher who has to deal with the students one by one. The classrooms of the teachers attending the study are not crowded. But, it is assumed that it is difficult to teach early reading and writing in the classrooms having more than 25 students. Chronological age is of great importance in teaching early reading and writing because it is expected to be parallel with physical, mental and social development. However, chronological age is not the single determiner of the teaching early reading and writing process. Despite the chronological age, there may be some individuals under or above the chronological age depending on personal differences (Akyol, 2010). In the study, because it is aimed to analyze the experiences of the students aged 60-69 months and their classroom teachers in teaching -30- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 26-44, 1 April, 2015 learning process, the chronological age is accepted as a measure. According to the measure, in the classrooms of the teachers attending the study there are at least 2 – in average 4- students younger than 69 months old. Data Collection Data of the study was collected with the interview and observation forms developed by the researchers. The most frequently used data collecting technique in qualitative researches is interview (Mason, 2005). In this study, an interview form structured with openended questions was used. Before preparing the questions in the data collection tool, we scanned the literature and analyzed the similar studies. Then, being consistent to the aim and the sub-problems of the study, a scheme form aiming to identify what the students 69 months old and younger experience in early reading and writing processes, how they are effected, what the teachers experience about these students, and how they direct the process was constructed. In order to validate the interview form prepared by the researchers, the form was evaluated by two field experts in terms of being understood and covering the topic which is studied; and put into the final form in the directions of suggestions. In the final form, there are four questions aiming to identify the personal characteristics of the teachers attending the research; and 8 questions aiming to present the reflections of backdating of the age to start primary school on teaching early reading and writing process and the experiences in the process. Table 2. Interview Places and Duration Attendant T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T11 T12 T13 T14 Interview Place Teachers’Lounge Teachers’Lounge Teachers’Lounge Teachers’Lounge Classroom Classroom Classroom Classroom Classroom Classroom Teachers’Lounge Teachers’Lounge Classroom Classroom Interview Duration 10 mins. 8 mins. 9 mins. 13 mins. 9 mins. 17 mins. 15 mins. 10 mins. 18 mins. 15 mins. 10 mins. 12 mins. 7 mins. 12 mins. In order to collect and diversify the data, we used an observation form beside the structured interview form. While forming the observation form, the same process preparing the interview form was followed by the researchers. In the observation form, there are four items about the personal information of the student being observed; and 19 items describing students’ physical, mental and social developments and some of their behaviors in the process of early reading and writing. For each of the items in observation form, we prepared a 4-scale measurement; 1: low, 2: medium, 3: good and 4: very good. So, the situation observed was standardized for each observation and observer. The data of the research was collected in March- April- May, 2013. Interviews – one of the data collection tools of the research- was held by a researcher and recorded with the help of a tape recorder. The interviews with the teachers were 8-10 minutes on average. Following is -31- The View of Teachers of First Graders Regarding Scheduling…H. Anilan & Y. Bay the information about where the interviews were recorded and how long they took. Observations -another data collection tool of the research – cover 20 students aged between 60 and 69 months old. The students chosen randomly from the classrooms of the teachers attending the study were observed by a researcher for three weeks and three hours a week. In other words, these students were observed in Turkish Language courses 3 hours a week, 9 hours in total. Analysis of the Data In analysis of the data of the study, we used descriptive analysis technique (Yıldırım and Şimşek, 2013). While analyzing the data, Elo and Kyngas’s (2007) preparation, organizing and reporting phases were taken into consideration. According to this; In Reporting Phase: At first, the interviews recorded were listened and typed with the help of computer. Based on the privacy policy of the attendants, the teachers interviewed were coded with “T” and numbers from 1 to 14. On the other hand, observation forms was ordered according to student observed, date of observation and observation order; and observation scores were compared. In organization phase: In this phase at first, considering research questions and conceptual aspect of the research, we formed a framework; and we determined under which themes we will organize and present the questions. The data gathered from interview and observations were grouped and matched with the interview questions. Interview questions were accepted as main themes. In Reporting Phase: In this phase, qualitative data were coded and grouped under themes and sub themes. We tried to present the data intelligibly. While analyzing the data, we aimed to support validity and contribute cogency (Wolcot, 1990), which is significant in qualitative researches, by quoting directly from the statements of the interviewees in order to make the topic clear. On the other hand, while explaining findings related to themes and sub-themes, we benefitted from the observation results. For this purpose we evaluated interview findings comparing to students’ observation scores based on repeated observations. Finally, the findings were interpreted considering literature. In order to provide reliability and validity of the research, we performed some processes. The researcher presented the findings fair-and-square and quoted from the statements of the interviewee in order to provide the validity of the research. Because according to Kirk and Miller (1986), the validity in a qualitative research means that the researcher observes the event much the same and quite fair-and-square (cited by: Yıldırım and Şimşek, 2013). On the other hand, we benefit from data diversity and attendant confirmation which are additional methods suggested in order to increase validity (Yıldırım and Şimşek, 2013). In order to provide data diversity, observations were conducted together with interviews. On the other hand, after analyzing data, the confirmation of the data were provided with 5 teacher determined randomly among the teachers in the research. In order to provide the reliability of the research, we followed the method which Stemler (2001) named as replicability or single coder reliability. According to this, if the same coder or coders get the same scores when they try to code the same data set again, it is accepted that the score reliability is provided. According to Stemler (2001) the high percentage of -32- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 26-44, 1 April, 2015 consistency between coder or coders shows that score reliability is high. In the study, the reliability is provided by comparing both single coder and two coders’ notion agreement percentage. For notion agreement, we used Miles and Huberman’s (1994) reliability formula: P(percentage of agreement)= Na(Notion Agreement)/Na(Notion Agreement)+Nd(Notion Disagreement)X100. As the result of the calculations, while the reliability was found as 95% for single coder, the reliability of the two coders was calculated as 91%; so the research was accepted as reliable. The codes which are notion disagreement for both single coder and two coders were revised and reached to an agreement. Findings and Comment The interview questions forming the sub-problems of the research were accepted as main themes. Eight main themes were formed such as teachers’ notions related to age implementation; the effect of the implementation towards early reading and writing process; comparison of students who are 69 months old or younger and older ones; problems of the students who are 69 months old or younger and solutions; self-care skills of the students who are 69 months old or younger; the problems of the teachers in the process of teaching early reading and writing; the effect of backdating of the age to start primary school on implementation of Phoneme based Sentence Method; the difference between the students who are 69 months old or younger and the students who are older than that age in terms of basic language skills. Teachers’ notions related to the backdating of the age to start primary school are given in Table 3. Table 3. Teachers’ Notions Related to the Backdating of the Age to Start Primary School Teachers’ Notions Related to the Backdating of the Age to Start Primary School Main Theme Theme Sub-Themes Positive Negative Mental Physical Mental Emotional Adaptation School and Environment Parents Concepts No problem in comprehension Weak small muscles, no hand craft, deficient in holding pencils and scissors, no self care skills, not tidying the goods, difficulty in activities Lack of attention, desire to play a game, lack of ability to obey the classroom rules, reading and comprehension problems, problems in concentration and perception, inability to sit Lack of self confidency Inability to adapt to school, group’s heterogeneity, difficulty of the courses, inability to attend to the activities, adaptation problems Environment of the school and the classroom is not suitable Mothers put the students off When the answers given by the teachers to the question “As a classroom teacher, How do you evaluate the backdating of the age to start primary school?”, it is seen that none of the teachers, except from only one teacher (T3) support the implementation. The teacher stating his/her support on the implementation states that he / she does not have any difficulty in comprehension and starts reading at the same time with other students. The teacher explains his/her notion as: I did not face any difficulty in comprehension. We started reading at about the same time with -33- The View of Teachers of First Graders Regarding Scheduling…H. Anilan & Y. Bay the other students. There was a time lag for about a month. (T3) The teachers attending the research states that the implementation is not advisable by citing some physical deficiencies such as weak small muscles, no hand craft, deficient in holding pencils and scissors, no self-care skills, not tidying the goods, difficulty in activities. The significance of the physical competence in early reading and writing is often emphasized (Başar, 2013; Bilir, 2005; Duran, 2013; Gündüz and Çalışkan, 2013). Followings are some of the notions of the teachers attending the research: …For example; they have difficulty in some kind of stuff such as cutting, sticking, tearing. They slog on holding scissors. Especially, one of them did not attend kindergarten, we had difficulty in both holding scissors and doing the activities. In short, he/she had much difficulty. While his/her friends were doing the activities easily, he/she could not do them. (T1) …we have difficulty in doing the activities. For example, he/she cannot hold the scissors or cut. This is because he/she have not completed the development of small muscles. (T9) … has not completed muscle development, cannot use books and notebooks properly. Even he/she cannot put his/her homework into the file. (T12) Teachers do not find the implementation advisable because of such mental development problems as lack of attention, desire to play a game, lack of ability to obey the classroom rules, reading and comprehension problems, problems in concentration and perception, inability to sit. In fact, it is stated that starting primary school earlier than six age causes certain problems in terms of mental readiness (Turkish Doctors’ Union). Following are certain teachers’ notions: I don’t approve the implementation; because, They have problems in concentration and perception. (T14) I don’t find the backdating of the age to start primary school advisable; because, I have difficulty in reading and comprehension activities especially with the younger students. (T11) Teachers state that student have certain problems such as inability to adapt to school, group’s heterogeneity, difficulty of the courses, inability to attend to the activities, adaptation problems; so, the implementation is not advisable. Whereas students’ skills of learning effectively and adaptation to school means readiness (Lewit and Baker, 1995). According to the statements of the teachers, it can be stated that the readiness of the students is not enough. Here are some teachers’ notions: … Secondly, it is not proper for two distinct age groups to be in the same class. While the older ones show success, the younger ones are overwhelmed. (T5) … I evaluate it as bad; because they cannot adapt it. (T2) …on the other hand, attention span of the young children is too short. They cannot adapt the lessons. (T11) Undoubtedly that there are many factors affecting teaching reading and writing. However, it is stated that school maturity which means students’ being ready for school physically, emotionally, mentally and socially (Yavuzer, 2010) is crucial, shows individual differences (Yazıcı, 2002); and just the individual reached this maturity can do what they are asked at -34- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 26-44, 1 April, 2015 school (Ülkü, 2007). But, Güneş (2013) states that school maturity is related to old theories and lost its validity at present. The information acquired related to the effect of the age implementation on the process of teaching early reading and writing are given in Table 4. When the answers given by the teachers to the question “How did backdating of the age implementation effect the process of teaching-learning?”, all the teachers – except from only one teacher (T3) – states that the process is affected negatively in terms of certain reasons. Following is the statement of the teacher stating that he/she is not affected from the process: It was positive. I had delay just for a month. I did not have any difficulty in comprehension or start to read with the students who are 66 months old. (T3) Followings are some teachers’ notions who think that the teaching-learning process is tiring and have difficulty in stages: Main Theme Theme The Effect of the Age Implementation on the Process of Teaching Early Reading and Writing Table 4. The Effect of the Age Implementation on the Process of Teaching Early Reading and Writing Did not effect negatively Effected negatively SubThemes Delay Concepts Tiring Tiring for teachers, students and parents; getting tired easily. Difficulty in stages Difficulties in preparation stage, difficulty in line studies, they could not make syllables from phonemes, difficulty in learning, problems in writing Trying to draw attention, getting ill-tempered or being introvert, caring other things, spoiling classroom order, inability to obey school or classroom rules Two different groups, learning slowly, dropping behind of the others, need to special care, the forming of level groups Worry of teaching, using the time of other lessons, inability to catch up with the other lessons, diverging from the program, lack of material Behaviour disorder Group’s difference Worries Delay for one month Of course it affected us in a negative way. In fact, we had many difficulties. It was a difficult process in terms of the teacher, the students and the parent. The parent worked very hard, made an effort. The child has just started to read, but he/she has many problems and he/she hardly read. Although the others can read the words they see, he/she has difficulty because he/she could not perceived spelling the letters and then combining the syllables together. (T1) They were doing the line works difficultly. There were no problems in teaching phonemes. But there were many problems while writing. (T9) Little children get tired easily because they have not completed their muscle development. (T11) The process of teaching early reading and writing is a problematic process for students, teachers and parents. It can be said that starting primary school at an earlier age increases these problems (Duran, 2013; Gündüz and Çalışkan, 2013). In the decision of backdating of the age to start primary school, gradual transition was not applied; and all the people in the scope of the decision were obliged to attend the implementation. There are many problems -35- The View of Teachers of First Graders Regarding Scheduling…H. Anilan & Y. Bay resulting from the classroom size containing two different age groups. Moreover, ıt is inevitable that this cause some behavior disorders. It is natural that teachers, students and parents worry in an environment created by these kinds of factors. The teachers attending the research agree that these reasons affect the process of teaching and learning in a negative way. Those are some of the notions of the teachers related to this topic: I completed the process of teaching learning by relinquishing other courses. I could not teach such an important lesson as life sciences. Because, I had to teach reading and writing at 1 st grade in order to get them ready for the 2nd class. (T12) It affected negatively. He/she is far behind from his/her friends. He/she is interested in the things other than lessons. Hence, the environment of the classroom is ruined. (T13) We had many difficulties because they are not at the same age. He/she obeyed the rules and adapted to school environment for two months. The noise in the classroom started to increase. Some of the students who were 66 months old referred to some other ways to draw attention. They get more aggressive or introvert. (T4) …teachers are given a book for 3 months for the name of getting the students adapted to the school. There is nothing apart from these books. The books are complicated. It is not fair to give the books pressed 4 years ago. (T6) Resources, materials, and equipments used in the process of teaching and learning are significant. In this scope, the books given to the teacher to use in the adaptation phase were the subject of critique (Gözütok et al., 2013). On the other hand, little children’s behavioral disorders because of the problems occurred in the groups are the results of their inability to solve problems. The skill of solving social problems plays a crucial role in becoming socialized (Yılmaz and Tepeli, 2013). The fact that teachers find the materials inadequate and that face the problems of the children affects the process of teaching and learning in a negative way. Findings related to the comparison of the students who are 69 months old or younger and the students who are older are summed in Table 5. Table 5. The Comparison of the Students who are 69 Months Old or Younger and the Students who are Older The Comparison of the Students who are 69 Months Old or Younger and the Students who are Older Main Theme Theme Older ones are ready Younger ones are not ready SubThemes Physical Concepts Muscles are developed, handcraft is proper Emotional Willing to learn, curious about learning Mental Comprehending easily, high perception, learning quickly Physical Weak handcraft, problems in writing, getting tired easily Mental Inability to comprehend phonemes, short attention, inability to understand instructions, low perception, getting bored easily Emotional Inability to adapt, low desire to learn Considering the question “How do you evaluate when you compare the students who are 69 months old or older and younger?”, it is seen that the student who are 72 months old or older -36- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 26-44, 1 April, 2015 are better than the others in every sense. Perception of the younger students is weak; their attention span is short; their adaptation skills are inadequate; they are weak physically; and they are unwilling. On the other hand, the older students are quite contrary. We can say that the age difference between students result in similar consequences, thus, age maturity in the process of teaching and learning is significant especially in terms of certain skills (Çelik, Boz, Gümüş, and Taştan, 2013; Gündüz and Çalışkan, 2013; Meral Kandemir et al., 2013; Örs, Erdoğan and Kipici, 2013). Following are some teacher statements: …now the students 72 months old are ready for all the things. They can hold pencils, scissors effectively; they can do the activities easily; they do not have difficulty in anything… but we had many difficulties in 66 months old students. As I said before, for example, both in process of teaching and learning and in activities. For example, adaptation to school phase. It lasted for a month and a half. We could not make them ready in a month and a half. I could not teach the letters. (T1) … you cannot teach the children 72 months old and younger than 72 months old in the same way. No matter what you do, students do not comprehend it. For instance, while you are teaching the phoneme “a”, you say “aaaaa”. They think that this is a game and scream in the corridor saying “aaaaa”. But the children 72 months old are not the same. They can understand all the instructions and carry out. (T10) There are significant differences. There is a difference for 1 year. There are problems in writing and speaking, and learning is really difficult in this period. (T13) Findings related to the problems of the students 69 months old or younger and solutions are given in Table 6. Table 6. The Problems of The Students 69 Months Old or Younger and Solutions The Problems of The Students 69 Months Old or Younger and Solutions Main Theme Theme Problems No problems Sub-Themes Consepts Attending the activities Communication Self care Meeting with parents, parents support, special care, Development Peer complaint, peer compliance Toilet, shopping at the canteen, peeing their pants, inability get dressed, difficulty in shoe strings and zips, getting ill frequently, nutrition Individual development, desks are large They do Good Answering the questions “Is there any problem students 69 months old or younger face in the classroom? If yes, how do you solve these problems?”, all the teachers – except from only one of them – reflect that they have problems in classroom. It is seen that they have problems mostly about self-care and toilet. This reflects on observation results. It is known that selfcare skills is a crucial problem with the students in these ages (Başar, 2013; Gündüz and Çalışkan, 2013; Meral Kandemir et al., 2013). Followings are some of teachers’ statements: The biggest problem is toilet. On the other hands, the children in that age have difficulty in buying their need at the canteen. (T4) You see the classroom although they are at the age group of six. Think that they are five. While playing a game, he/she comes, and “Sir, I have to pee; Sir, Ayşe has wetted her clothes; -37- The View of Teachers of First Graders Regarding Scheduling…H. Anilan & Y. Bay Sir, Mehmet has pee his pants...” (T7) At first, we suffered from self-care, meeting physical needs. They slogged tidying their clothes. In order to solve this problem, we make them wear casual clothes. This is so because they cannot fasten their zips and loop their buttons. They could not tie their shoe strings, I tied their shoe strings.” (T8) One of the most important problems is toilet. They cannot hold their pees; some of them pee their pants. One of them pee his/her pants 6-7 times. I send him toilet in the lessons; otherwise he/she pee his/her pants. They cannot meet their vital needs. (T11) Self-care skills of the students who are 69 months old or younger are given in Table 7. Analyzing the answers given by the teachers to the question “What can you tell about selfcare skills of the students who are 69 months old or younger?”, it is seen that little children cannot carry out self-care skills because of physical inadequacy; they have problems in especially meeting toilet needs (Başar, 2013; Gündüz and Çalışkan, 2013; Meral Kandemir et al., 2013) protecting their goods, feeding, and changing their clothes. It reflected on the observation results that the problems decreased but have not finished yet. It is understood that, in solutions of the problems, parents and teachers support the students. Here are some teachers’ notions related to this subject: We have problems in toilet skills, looking after their clothes, fastening their zips, tying shoe strings, holding pencils etc…(T8) Main Theme Theme Self-Care Skills of the Students Who are 69 Months Old or Younger Table 7. Self-Care Skills of the Students Who are 69 Months Old or Younger Problematic Sub-Themes Concepts toilet Desire to go toilet frequently, peeing their pants, obligatory change of the clothes, inability to go toilet alone Desire to g oto washbasin frequently, washing hands, low cleaning, cleaning after toilet, pediculosis Inability to feed alone, inability to eat food Washbasin/Cl eaning Nutrition Clothes Goods No problem Themselves Inability to zip or unzip, inability to loop the buttons, clothes cleaning, inability to tie the shoe strings They cannot protect their goods, they are messy, they cannot distinguish their clothes They solve in several days They slog on toilet training, cleaning their hands and clothes. They have not reached that maturity. On the other hand, in these dirt places, children have pediculosis in their hair. Their parents do not look after. (T14) When there is a student who pee his/her pants, I don’t get him/her in. they get demoralized at some point. I waited outside in a room and called his/her mother. Their parents come here and either they bring them away or the parents bring here extra clothes and changed their clothes. I did so… for example; I unzip some of my students, or fasten their buttons. We dealt with these kind of things in the first semester. I do not have any problems now… (T7) He/she could not manage to clean himself/herself. He cannot go to the toilet alone. He cannot manage to eat his/her meal. (T13) -38- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 26-44, 1 April, 2015 They could not wear their coats. They all have this problem. I had to interfere in this period. They cannot distinguish their books, notebooks and goods; they cannot look after them. I collected their goods. They have difficulty in finding the parts in work books. (T9) Teachers face some problems in the process of teaching and learning. Findings related to the problems teachers face in the process of teaching early reading and writing are given in Table 8. Main Themes Themes SubThemes Concepts The Problems Teachers Face in the Process of Teaching Early Reading and Writing Table 8. The Problems Teachers Face in the Process of Teaching Early Reading and Writing There are problems Mental He/she learnt the letters difficultly, he/she does not know the writing of the letters, he/she learns slowly, he/she could not start reading and writing, inability to obey the rules, need to repeat, weak attention, low interest, dropping behind, he/she does not understand the phonemes, mental maurity Bad handwriting, difficulty in writing, he/she could not write what he/she was said Lost his/her self confidence Physical There is no problem Self Confidency Groups are different No problem Different age groups, inclusion There is no problem When analyzing the answers given by the teachers to the question “do you have problems in the process of teaching and learning? What can be the reason of this?”, it is understood that students have problems especially because of mental deficiencies. Lack of attention and interest are the explicit ones. While attention span of an adult is 15-20 minutes, it is not advisable to expect the students in this age group to sit still for about 40 minutes and listen to the lessons or attend to the activities (Başar, 2013; Güve, 2012; Turkish Doctors’ Union, 2012). Findings related to the effect of backdating of the age to start primary school on the implementation of Phoneme Based Sentence Method are given in the Table 9. Table 9. The Effect of Backdating of the Age on the Implementation of Phoneme Based Sentence Method Theme The Effect of Backdating of the Age on the Implementation of Phoneme Based Sentence Method Main Themes Difficult Not difficult Sub-Themes Concepts He/she should not start school The group should not be mixed Schools and classrooms should be improved Fear of unsuccessfullness They did not attend kindergarten, we should return to the old system They should be collected together Easy The groups can be homogenized fort he others There should be materials, the schools should be improved Younger ones should not start, loss of self confidency There is no emphasis on phoneme based sentence method and its phases in the contents of the answers given by the teachers to the question “Does age implementation brings challenges in -39- The View of Teachers of First Graders Regarding Scheduling…H. Anilan & Y. Bay terms of application of the method? What should be done as a solution?” According to Güneş (2013), brain researches explain that reading – writing preparatory works should start from the birth, children should be taught reading writing in 4-5 ages, and the age 7 is too late. However, the fact that the teachers just states that there are problems in their answers, and they did not state anything related to the phases of the method is not enough to detail the subject. This can be caused by the fact that the teachers do not know the phases of Phoneme Based Sentence Method or this can also be caused by ignorance. Here are some teachers’ notions about whether age implementation causes a challenge in terms of the application of the method: Bringing. At first there should be some improvements in the basis. Physical conditions of the classroom and the schools should be improved and then such an implementation can be applied. (T14) In my opinion, there should not be a mixed group. They should be separated or children 66 months old should attend kindergarten. (T2) In order to solve toilet problems, they should adapt physical infrastructure. Books should be arranged according to age groups. (T9) Findings related to the difference between younger students and older students in terms of basic language skills are shown in Table 10. Main Themes Themes The Difference between Younger Students and Older Students in Terms of Basic Language Skills Table 10. The Difference between Younger Students and Older Students in Terms of Basic Language Skills There is difference SubThemes Dropping behind Self expression Self confidence writing Concepts They are dropping behind in all fields, challange in teaching letters“ş, r, ğ, g, y”, confusing the letters k-t, r-y, d-t Weak vocabulary, challenge in speaking, difficulty in self expression, they cannot form a they cannot say their adress, managing speaking late They are shy, they are not self confident Inability to write what they hear, inability to write what they speak, inability to write between lines Teachers think that there is difference between two groups answering the question “Is there any difference between two groups in terms of basic language skills? If yes, what kind of differences is there?” These differences are high in dropping behind, inability in selfexpression, lack of self-confidence, inability to write. This is reflected in observation scores collected in the research. Başar (2013) believes that the students will improve their writing even if they have challenges in writing. Result and Suggestions Following results are achieved in the research aiming to identify how backdating of the age to start primary school reflect in the process of teaching-learning early reading and writing according to teachers’ notions. -40- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 26-44, 1 April, 2015 (1) The teachers attending the research do not find backdating of the age to start primary school advisable. Teachers do not find physical and mental skills of the students in that age group sufficient. (2) Backdating of the age to start primary school affects teaching-learning processes in a negative way. Students have challenges in the phases of teaching early reading and writing; they show behavioral disorders due to negative effect of the age; the fact that students from different age groups are in the same class affects the process of teaching and learning in a negative way. (3) The students who are 72 months old and older ones are better in every sense. Perception of younger students is weak; their attention span is short; their adaptation skills are low; they are also unwilling and incompetent. For older students, the situation is the opposite. (4) The students who are 69 months old or younger have challenges in attending the activities, communicating, and especially self-care skills. (5) It is seen that the students who are 69 months old or younger cannot carry out self-care skills due to their physical inability; they have difficulty in meeting toilet needs, protecting their goods, feeding, getting dressed and undressed. (6) Teachers have challenges in the process of teaching-learning resulting from students’ mental inadequacy. Lack of attention and interest are the most explicit ones. (7) According to the teachers attending the research, backdating of the age to start primary school makes the implementation of Phoneme Based Sentence Method difficult. (8) It is seen that students who are in different age groups are also different from each other in terms of basic language skills. The difference is disadvantageous to younger students; moreover, it is high in dropping behind, inability to express them, lack of self-confidence, inability to write. These can be suggested depending on these results: (1) The age implementation should be softened in 2013-2014 educational term; moreover, it can be retreated. (2) If the process goes on as it is, materials, resources and process should be revised. (3) Regardless of age implementation, preschool education should be obligatory. (4) Teachers should be informed about how they treat younger students and what they do. (5) Further researches should be conducted on this topic. References Akpınar, E. Yıldız, E ve Ergin, Ö. (2006). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğretmenlik Mesleğine Yönelik Tutumları. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, 56-62. Akyol, H. (2010). Yeni Programa Uygun Türkçe Öğretim Yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Ankara Üniversitesi (2012). Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi’nin 222 sayılı İlköğretim ve Eğitim Kanunu ile Bazı Kanunlarda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun Teklifi’ne İlişkin Görüşü. http://www.education.ankara.edu.tr/ Erişim tarihi: 17.05.2012. Başar, M. (2013). 60-66 Ay Aralığında İlkokula Başlayan Öğrencilerin Kişisel Özbakım ve İlkokuma-yazma Becerilerinin Öğretmen Görüşlerine Göre Değerlendirilmesi. Turkish Studies, 8(8), 241-252. -41- The View of Teachers of First Graders Regarding Scheduling…H. Anilan & Y. Bay Bilir, A. (2005). İlköğretim Birinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Özellikleri ve İlkokuma Yazma Öğretimi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(1), 87-100 Blatchford, P., Bassett, P. ve Brown, P. (2005). Teachers’ and Pupils’ Behavior in Large and Small Classes: A Systematic Observation Study of Pupils Aged 10 and 11 Years, Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 454-467. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi (2012). 5.1.1961 Tarih ve 222 Sayılı İlköğretim ve Eğitim Kanunu ile Bazı Kanunlarda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun Teklifi Hakkında Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi’nin Güncellenen Görüşü. http://fed.boun.edu.tr/form_files/Bogazi%C3%A7i_%C3%9Cniversitesi_Egitim_Fak %C3%BCltesi%E2%80%99nin_G%C3%BCncellenen_G%C3%B6r%C3%BC%C5% 9F%C3%BC.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 10.12.2013. Celep, C., Doyuran, Ş., Sarıdede, U. ve Değirmenci, T. (2004). Eğitim Örgütlerinde Çok Boyutlu İş Etiği ve Örgütsel Adanmışlık. Bildiri. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, XIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı Eğitim Fakültesi, 06-09 Temmuz 2004-Malatya. Cresswell, J. (2012). Educational Research. Boston: Pearson Education Inc. Çelik, Z., Boz, N., Gümüş, S., and Taştan, F. (2013). 4+4+4 eğitim reformunu izleme raporu. Ankara: Eğitimciler Birliği Sendikası (eğitim bir-sen) yay. Çermik, H., Doğan, B. ve Şahin, A. (2010). Sınıf Öğretmenliği Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğretmenlik Mesleğini Tercih Sebepleri. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(2), 201-2012. Duran, E. (2013). İlkokula 60. Ayında Başlayan Öğrencilerin Yazı Beceri Gelişimlerinin İncelenmesi. International Journal of Social Science, 6(2), 1075-1085. Eğitim-İş. (2012). Eğitim-İş Raporu Ağustos 2012. http://www.egitimis.org.tr/haber-arsiv. Erişim tarihi: 10.12.2013. Eğitim Reformu Girişimi (ERG). (2012). TBMM Genel Kurulu’nda Görüşülmeye Başlanan “İlköğretim ve Eğitim Kanunu İle Bazı Kanunlarda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun Teklifi” Hakkında Değerlendirme. http://erg.sabanciuniv.edu/sites/erg.sabanciuniv.edu/files/ERG.GerekceliDegerlendirm e.4_4_4.YasaTeklifi.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 11.12.2013. Eğitim-Sen. (2012). Sorularla 4+4+4 Eğitim Modelinde Yaşanacak Sorunlar. Eğitim-Sen Bülteni Eylül-Ekim 2012, (23), 18-21. www.egitimsen.org.tr/ekler/a7cd181b75e2dac_ek.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 10.12.2013. Ekiz, D. (2006). Sınıf Öğretmenliği Mesleğine Yönelen adayların Profilleri ve Geleceğe Yönelik Beklentilerinin İncelenmesi. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 16(1), 131-147. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2007). The Qualitative Content Analysis Process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62 (1), 107-115 Emir, S. ve Kanlı, E. (2009). İlköğretim Öğretmenlerinin Öğrencilerini Motive Etme Biçimlerinin İncelenmesi. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2), 63-79. Gözütok, D., Ulubey, Ö., Akçatepe, A. G., Koçer, E. ve Rüzgar, M. E. (2013). 4+4+4 Yapılanması Kapsamında Hazırlanan Uyum ve Hazırlık Çalışmaları Kitaplarının Değerlendirilmesi. http://epg.education.ankara.edu.tr/444-yapilanmasi-kapsamindahazirlanan-uyum- ve-hazirlik-calismalari-kitaplarinin-degerlendirilmesi. Erişim tarihi: 10.12.2013. Güçlü, M. (2002). İlköğretimde Kalabalık Sınıflar Sorunu ve Çözüm Önerileri. Eğitim Araştırmaları, 9(2), 52-58. Gündüz, F. ve Çalışkan, M. (2013). 60-66, 66-72, 72-84 Aylık Çocukların Okul Olgunluk ve Okuma Yazma Becerilerini Kazanma Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi. Turkish Studies, 8(8), 379-398. -42- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 26-44, 1 April, 2015 Güneş, F. (2013). Okuma Yazma Öğrenme Yaşı. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 9(4): 280298. Gür, B. S., Özoğlu, M., Coşkun, İ. ve Görmez, M. (2012). 2012’de Eğitim. Seta Analiz, (58), 6-10. http://setav.org/tr/2012de-egitim/analiz/2381. Güven, İ. (2012). Eğitimde 4+4+4 ve Fatih Projesi Yasa Tasarısı = Reform mu? İlköğretim Online, 11(3), 556-577. [Online]: http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr. Erişim tarihi: 10.12.2013. Kesicioğlu, O. S. (2013). Sınıf Öğretmenliği Öğretmen Adaylarının Okul Öncesi Eğitime İlişkin Algılarının İncelenmesi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(43), 183-199. http://www.e-sosder.com/?sayfa=dergilist&sayi=43.0. Erişim tarihi: 11.12.2013. Lewit, E. M. ve Baker, L. S. (1995). School Readiness. The Future of Children. Critical Issues for Children and Youths, 5(2), 128-139. Mason, J. (2005). Qualitative Researching (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications. Kandemir, E. M., Şara, P., Akay, Y., ve Zemin, S. (2013). 12 Yıl Zorunlu Eğitime İlişkin 1. Sınıf Öğretmenleri Ve Velilerinin Görüşleri. Turkish International Journal of Special Education and Guidance & Counselling (TIJSEG) ISSN: 1300-7432, 2(2). Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook Qualitative Data Analysis. Second Edition. California: Sage Publications, Inc. Müftüoğlu, Ö. (2012). Emek Piyasalarının Yeniden Yapılandırılması Sürecinde 4+4+4 Formülü. Eğitim Bilim Toplum Dergisi, 10(40), 25-33. http://www.egitimbilimtoplum.com.tr/index.php/ebt/article/view/487. Erişim tarihi: 10.12.2013. Oktay, A. ve Unutkan, Ö. P. (2003). İlköğretime Hazır Oluş ve Okul Öncesi Eğitimle İlköğretimin Karşılaştırılması (Ed. M. Sevinç). Erken Çocuklukta Gelişim ve Eğitimde Yeni Yaklaşımlar. İstanbul: Morpa Kültür Yayınları. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi (ODTÜ) (2012). 5.1.1961 Tarih ve 222 Sayılı İlköğretim ve Eğitim Kanunu ile Bazı Kanunlarda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun Teklifi” Hakkında ODTÜ Eğitim Fakültesinin Görüşü. http://www.fedu.metu.edu.tr/web/documents/other/222sayilIlkogretimveEgitimKanun uHakkindaEgitimFakultesiGorusu_s4_1.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 11.12.2013. Örs, Ç., Erdoğan, H. ve Kipici, K. (2013). Eğitim Yöneticileri Bakış Açısıyla 12 Yıllık Kesinti-li Zorunlu Eğitim Sistemi: Iğdır Örneği. Iğdır Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4, 131-154. Özarslan, N. ve Gündüz, H. B. (2013). Farklı Yaş Kategorilerindeki (60-71 Ay ve 72-84 Ay) İlkokul Birinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Akademik Olgunluk Düzeyleri ve Okula Uyum Sorunları. Bildiri Özeti. Marmara Üniversitesi 8. Ulusal Eğitim Yönetimi Kongresi: 07-09 Kasım 2013-İstanbul: s. 101-104. Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17). http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17. Erişim tarihi: 13.12.2013. Türk Eğitim-Sen. (2012). Türkiye Eğitim, Öğretim ve Bilim Hizmetleri Kolu Kamu Çalışanları Sendikası Genel Merkezi Aylık Haber Bülteni, (99), 12-13. http://www.turkegitimsen.org.tr/yayinlar.php. Erişim tarihi: 11.12.2013. Türk Tabipler Birliği (2012). Çocukların Gelişim Süreçleri ve Okula Başlama. http://www.ttb.org.tr/index.php/Yazismalar/1313-2012-3331.html. Erişim tarihi: 13.12.2013. Ülkü, B. Ü. (2007). Anasınıfı ve İlköğretim 1. Sınıfa Devam Eden Çocukların Velileri ve Öğretmenlerinin, Çocukların Okul Olgunluğu Hakkındaki Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana. -43- The View of Teachers of First Graders Regarding Scheduling…H. Anilan & Y. Bay Woodside, A. (2010). Case Study Research: Theory, Methods, Practice. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Yaman, E. (2010). Kalabalık Sınıfların Etkileri: Öğrenciler Ne Düşünüyor? Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 18(2), 403-414. Yavuzer, H. (2010). Çocuğun İlk 6 Yılı. İstanbul: Remzi Kitapevi. Yazıcı, Z. (2002). Okul öncesi eğitiminin okul olgunluğu üzerine etkisinin incelenme si. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 155-156, 235-245. Yazıcı, H. (2009). Öğretmenlik Mesleği, Motivasyon Kaynakları Ve Temel Tutumlar: Kuramsal Bir Bakış. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 17(1), 33-46. Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları. Yılmaz, E. ve Tepeli, K. (2013). 60-72 Aylık Çocukların Sosyal Problem Çözme Becerilerinin Duyguları Anlama Becerileri Açısından İncelenmesi. TSA (Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi), 17(2), 117-130 Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research (3rd edition). California: Sage Publications, Inc. Yörükoğlu, A. (2003). Çocuk Ruh Sağlığı. İstanbul: Özgür Yayınları. -44- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE) Vol. 5(1), pp. 45-57, 1 April, 2015 Available online at http://mije.mevlana.edu.tr/ http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.71.5.1 The Relationship among Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptual Knowledge, Opinions Regarding Proof and Proof Skills Muhammet Doruk* Primary Mathematics Education, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey Abdullah Kaplan Primary Mathematics Education, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey The aim of this study is to reveal the relationship among preservice mathematics teachers’ conceptual knowledge, opinions regarding proof and proof skills in terms of the definition of the Received in revised form: convergence of a sequence. The participants of the research are 25.03.2015 composed of six pre-service mathematics teachers who are thirdyear students at the department of elementary mathematics teaching Accepted: 25.03.2015 in a state university located in Turkey. The data of the research were collected via semi-structured interviews. According to the Key words: findings of the research, it was found that the majority of the preMathematical proof, opinions service teachers who participated in the study did not have a regarding proof, conceptual knowledge sufficient level of conceptual knowledge on the definition of convergence of sequence; that their opinions on proof were negative; and that their level of success in proving the theorem, which they had proven before, was considerably low. Furthermore, it was found in the research that there was a strong relationship among pre-service teachers’ conceptual knowledge, opinions regarding proof and proof skills, and the academic success achieved in the related course did not reflect on their proof skills. Article history Received: 17.09.2014 Introduction One of the most important aims of mathematics instruction is to ensure the development of obtaining logical answers to “why” and “what for” questions, that is to say, the development of reasoning (Altıparmak & Öziş, 2005). For the mathematics instruction to achieve this aim, mathematical proofs constitute an important tool in terms of dealing with not only the correctness of a statement but also why it is correct. Mathematical proofs are regarded as the most important factor in learning mathematics because they involve associating judgments in a certain mold and being sure of these judgments in view of the development of mathematics and realities or propositions (Knuth, 2002). When mathematical proofs are evaluated in terms of mathematics instruction, they provide a considerable amount of benefits to the students in mathematical terms. The development and maturation of students’ mathematical knowledge through mathematical proofs (Kitcher, 1984), developing the skill of critical thinking in students and offering new methods with which students can solve problems (Rav, 1999) constitute just some of these benefits. * Corresponding author: Phone:+90-543-963-77-39. Fax.:+90-442-236-09-55, e-mail: mdoruk20@gmail.com The Relationship among Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptual Knowledge…M. Doruk & A. Kaplan Although mathematical proofs are regarded as an important part of mathematics instruction (Güven, Çelik & Karataş, 2005), the building block of mathematics (Heinze & Reiss, 2003) and the objective of advanced mathematics (Weber, 2001) by many researchers, proof is a concept about which students from every level experience difficulty and have prejudice (Almeida, 2003; Arslan, 2007; Arslan & Yıldız 2010; Coşkun, 2009; De Villiers 1990; Jones, 2000; Moore, 1994; Raman, 2003). When the difficulties experienced by the students during proof processes are examined, we see that Moore (1994) listed these difficulties as failure to state the definitions; failure to understand the meanings of the concepts intuitively; failure to use concept images during proof process; generalization and insufficiency in using examples; failure to know what kind of a proof structure to form in view of the definitions; failure to understand mathematical language and notations; and lastly, failure to know how to begin the proof process. One of the most common difficulties experienced in performing proof is the lack of conceptual knowledge regarding the concepts with which the proof is related. This difficulty experienced by the students is a common finding that was obtained in the researchers conducted by different researchers (Gibson, 1998; Knapp, 2005; Moore, 1990; 1994; Weber, 2006;). Another factor affecting students’ mathematical proof processes is their opinions regarding proof. Beliefs and opinions are not only related to attitudes, but also directly affect proof processes. This is because beliefs are influential in selecting proof method and strategy, which stands as a difficulty in proof processes (Furinghetti & Morselli, 2009). In this regard, it can be stated that opinions regarding proof affect the success of activities involving proof. When the reasons for the difficulties experienced by the pre-service teachers in proof process are examined, it is observed that the mathematics courses given in universities are filled with proofs that are difficult to understand for pre-service teachers at first glance, and consequently, pre-service teachers memorize proofs without understanding them in order to pass these courses (Conradie & Frith, 2000). Since these courses in universities are generally given via the traditional method, students mostly take the exams without internalizing the concepts and instead memorizing the theorems and contents of the proofs without even knowing them, and they pass the exams. Furthermore, according to mathematicians, mathematical proof is filled with key ideas rather than the information existent in it. However, mathematicians do not place the necessary emphasis on the key ideas during instruction, and more importantly, they do not use these ideas during evaluation (Raman, 2003). Formation of valid ideas and proofs along with criticism of the ideas is an integral part of performing mathematics. If this reasoning skill is not earned by students, mathematics becomes a process of following an operation sequence and imitation of examples without considering what operation sequence means (Ross, 1998). When the difficulties experienced by the pre-service teachers are taken into account, we can generally talk about the existence of two conditions. One of these conditions is that the preservice teachers do not have a correct idea about mathematical proof and they cannot even remember the proof (Chazan, 1993; Moore, 1994; Weber, 2001), whereas the other condition is that they do not understand the concepts and theorems and implement them in a systematized manner. The fact that the pre-service teachers remember a theorem or a concept does not guarantee that they will perform the proof. They fail in performing the proof and come to an impasse as they do not know what to do. In order to understand the reasons for this failure, it is more useful to understand the methods utilized by the pre-service teachers while they try to perform proof (Weber, 2001). The aim of this study is to reveal the relationship among pre-service mathematics teachers’ conceptual knowledge, opinions regarding proof and proof skills in terms of the definition of convergence of sequence. Answers were sought to the following research problems within the scope of this aim. -46- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 45-57, 1 April, 2015 1. What is the level of pre-service teachers’ conceptual knowledge regarding the subject of convergence of sequence? 2. What are the pre-service teachers’ opinions regarding proof? 3. What is the level of pre-service teachers’ proof skills on the subject of convergence of sequence? Method Taking the qualitative research approach as a basis, the case study model was used in the study. It was concluded that the most appropriate case study design for this study was the holistic multiple-case study. This is because there is more than one case that can be perceived as holistic alone in this design. Each case is studied holistically in itself and later compared with each other (Yıldırım & Şimşek, 2006). In this study, three cases were examined, namely pre-service mathematics teachers’ conceptual knowledge, opinions regarding proof and proof skills in terms of convergence of sequence. Then, these sections were studied holistically and compared with each other. Research Group This study was conducted with six pre-service mathematics teachers who are studying at the department of elementary mathematics teaching in a state university located in Turkey. The pre-service teachers are third-year students at the department of elementary mathematics teaching, which is a four-year department. The average age of pre-service teachers (three of whom are females and the remaining three are males) is twenty two. The names used in the research are not the real names of the pre-service teachers. The names used are the aliases designated by the researchers. While selecting the participants, necessary attention was paid to the fact that their knowledge on the subject of sequence is easy to remember. For this purpose, the research was conducted directly after the Analysis 3 course in which the subject of sequence was given. While selecting the participants, students who successfully passed the Analysis 3 course and who had different letter grades were preferred. Therefore, maximum variation sampling, which is among the purposeful sampling methods, was used in selecting the participants. This is because the aim in a sampling, which is based on maximum variation, is not for generalizations. On the contrary, the aim is to attempt to determine whether or not there are common or shared phenomena among the cases that exhibit variation, and to set forth the difference aspects of the problem according to this variation (Yıldırım & Şimşek, 2006). In the university where the study was conducted, students who pass the course are given letter grades, namely AA, BA, BB, CB, CC, DC and DD ranging from the most successful to the least successful. Since there were no students who passed the Analysis 3 course with the letter grades DC and DD, these students were not included in the research group. Instead, one more students with the letter grade BA were included in the research group, considering that he/she might be able to provide more information related to the subject. While selecting the research group, students who successfully passed Analysis 3 course were listed according to their letter grades. Then, participants were randomly selected from these lists. The aliases and letter grades of the participating pre-service teachers are as follows: Aydın (AA), Burak (BB), Cemil (CC), Bade (BA), Banu (BA), and Ceren (CB). In view of the letter grades achieved in the Analysis 3 course, Aydın was the most successful student whereas Cemil was the least successful student. Data Collection -47- The Relationship among Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptual Knowledge…M. Doruk & A. Kaplan The data of the research were obtained via semi-structured “Proof Process Interview Form” (PPIF). The PPIF is composed of three sections. In the first section, the participants were given the definitions of sequence and convergence of sequence that were required for proving the theorem in the third section. The aim of this section is to observe the degree to which the participants understood and internalized these concepts and see whether or not they could perform the proof when they had the necessary definitions. In the second section of the PPIF, there are open-ended questions that were asked in order to reveal the pre-service teachers’ opinions regarding proof. In the third section, in order to reveal the proof skills of the participants, they were requested to prove the “(𝑠𝑛 ) ⟶ 𝑠 and (𝑡𝑛 ) ⟶ 𝑡 ⇒ (𝑠𝑛 + 𝑡𝑛 ) ⟶ 𝑠 + 𝑡” theorem again. While preparing the PPIF, the opinions of three academicians – two of whom were lecturers specializing in qualitative research methods and one of whom was a lecturer specializing in the analysis and theory of functions – were taken. Before the interviews conducted with the pre-service teachers, the researchers explained that the research would completely be conducted upon the principle of voluntariness, and the pre-service teachers who did not want to continue this study could leave the study whenever they wished. Furthermore, the pre-service teachers were told that the interviews would be recorded with an audio recorder. They were asked whether this condition would constitute an inconvenience for them. Their permissions were taken on this matter. The researchers stated that the names of and information about the pre-service teachers would not be shared with anybody, and aliases would be used instead of their real names in the research. The interviews conducted with the pre-service teachers lasted for 25-30 minutes. All interviews were conducted in an environment where the second author and the pre-service teachers could talk one-to-one and where it was believed that external factors would not distract the participants. The definitions and theorems used in the PPIF are given below. Definition 1 (Sequence of Real Numbers): The function, which is defined as f: N → R, is called sequence of real numbers. Definition 2 (Convergence of Sequence): (sn ) ⟶ s ⟺ for ∀ε > 0, ∃n0 ∈ N such that for ∀n > n0 , |sn − s| < 𝜀. Theorem: (sn ) ⟶ s and (t n ) ⟶ t ⇒ (sn + t n ) ⟶ s + t. Analysis of the data Descriptive analysis was used in analyzing the data obtained from the opinions of preservice teachers. The data obtained in descriptive analysis are summarized and interpreted according to the themes that have been designated before (Yıldırım & Şimşek, 2006). Data triangulation was used in the study. The participants were requested to think aloud. Written statements and audio records were evaluated together. Firstly, audio records were transcribed in the study. While transcribing the data, discussions were made with the participants about the incomprehensible statements. Thus, incomprehensible statements were clarified. After the process of transcribing the interview data, the researchers classified the raw data according to the categories designated beforehand. Following the classification stage, the categories were examined by two colleagues of the researchers. Lastly, the feedback and categories obtained were reorganized. An attempt was made to present the written and verbal statements of the participants and their dialogues with the researcher in a frequently descriptive manner. Therefore, it was aimed to increase the reliability of the research data. Findings -48- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 45-57, 1 April, 2015 Findings regarding pre-service mathematics teachers’ conceptual knowledge on the definition of convergence of sequence, their opinions regarding proof and proof skills are presented in this section. Findings Regarding Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptual Knowledge on the Definition of Convergence of Sequence In the first section of the study, the participants were given the definitions sequence of real numbers and convergence of sequence that they would use while they were performing proof. The participants were requested to read aloud these definitions. The following questions were put to the participants in order to understand the degree to which they internalized the definition of convergence of sequence: “What do you understand from the convergence of a sequence towards a point?” and “What is the function of n0 in the definition of convergence of sequence?” In view of the received answers, it was found that the participants’ level of conceptual knowledge could be divided into adequate and inadequate categories. The categories of the participants are given in Table 1. Table 1. Pre-service teachers’ conceptual knowledge about definition of convergence of sequence Adequate Inadequate Bade Banu Aydın Cemil Burak Ceren In Table 1, it is observed that among the participants, only Bade was able to explain the definition of convergence of sequence in her own words. That is to say, she internalized the concept of convergence of a sequence towards a point. In view of this, it is deduced that Bade’s knowledge on the definition of convergence of sequence was at least at conceptual knowledge level. Bade’s answers are given below. Table 2. Bade’s answers What do you understand from the What is the function of 𝑛0 in the definition of convergence of a sequence towards a point? convergence of sequence? Since the domain of this sequence is positive whole numbers, there will be more than one number. These numbers gradually approach towards a certain number. Here, a real number sequence. When sequence is a complex sequence, it can convergence towards a complex number, too. That is to say, it approaches a certain number within a certain rule. However, I cannot associate it with daily life. To my knowledge, 𝑛0 is... There are many numbers in the sequence. Most of these numbers converge towards s. Several of these numbers do not converge. That is to say, they are finite. However, when approximately all of them converge, we consider them convergent. We do not regard them and we see them as mathematically small. In other words, we ignore them. It was found that Banu, Aydın, Cemil, Burak and Ceren were not able to explain the definition of convergence of sequence in their own words. That is to say, their knowledge on the definition of convergence of sequence was not at conceptual knowledge level. Banu and Burak’s answers are given below. Table 3. Banu and Burak’s answers What do you understand from the convergence of a What is the function of 𝑛0 in the sequence towards a point? definition of convergence of -49- The Relationship among Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptual Knowledge…M. Doruk & A. Kaplan sequence? Banu: Let me put it this way: in order for 𝑠𝑛 sequence to converge towards a number, it is necessary that ε>0 and we have a 𝑛0 natural number. The number, in which term of the sequence that we took converges towards negative, is a statement in the form of a small ε. I don’t know how to express it verbally. However, I think it is symbolic. Isn’t this right? For instance, we take 𝑠𝑛 and progress as 𝑠1 , 𝑠2 , 𝑠3 . We represent it with the natural number there. Can’t we state it as that natural number? I thought we could. However, I don’t know what exactly it is right now. Burak: We can call the value, which will be taken by a sequence in the limit condition for infinite cases, the place where that sequence converge. Can we say that the sequence exactly takes that value? Although it does not exactly take that value, it is near to it. As stated by this definition, we are talking about the values that it takes in the neighborhood of ε. I cannot express it precisely. Findings Regarding Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Opinions on Proof In the second section of the research, it was aimed to reveal the participants’ opinions on proof from their statements. It was found that the participants’ opinions on proof fell under “Positive” and “Negative” categories. The categories of the participants are given in Table 4. Table 4. Pre-service teachers’ opinions on proof Positive Negative Bade Banu Aydın Cemil Burak Ceren In table 4, it is seen that only Bade had a positive opinion on proof. Bade’s opinions on proof are given below. Bade: I better understand the subjects on which I can perform proof. I believe so. That is because we take everything into account while performing proof. Therefore, when I perform the proof about linear independence in linear algebra and when I try to prove it on my own with pencil and paper, it becomes a better experience. Then, I don’t forget what linear independence is. Similarly, there are limit definitions, convergence and related subjects in analysis, too. It becomes a more productive experience in them. It was found that other participants had negative opinions on proof. Most of the participants regarded proof as an activity that must be memorized and that cannot be understood. The following statements of Ceren and Aydın, who are among the participants having negative opinions on proof, are as follows. Ceren: Proof became a memorized subject in the way that it was given to us, or we were not able to think how this theorem could be proven. Can this theorem be proven with only this method? Is this the only solution to it? We never thought about it. That is to say, it was proven and we memorized it. It was like this, and similar rules can be applied to others. That is how we used it. Aydın: We did not care about it much. Passing courses was enough for us. I think I have no interest other than passing courses... Theorems are long and hard to solve. It takes time to prove them. They are somewhat complex. I mean you accept something from different places. I feel that is wrong. It is right, but I forget it since it seems a little complicated. That is why we do not care about it much... -50- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 45-57, 1 April, 2015 We rather tried to memorize the proof. Then, we performed it when they asked us about it. Other than that, we did not pay particular attention to it. Findings Regarding Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Proof Skills About the Concept of Convergence of Sequence After the participants’ conceptual knowledge on the definition of convergence of sequence and their opinions regarding proof were examined, the participants were requested to prove the “(sn ) ⟶ s and (t n ) ⟶ t ⇒ (sn + t n ) ⟶ s + t” theorem, which they had proven before, in order to examine the pre-service teachers’ proof processes. Before performing the proof, the participants stated that they had proven this theorem before and the definitions given in the definitions section were enough to prove this theorem. The conversation between Bade and the researcher about this subject is given below. Researcher: In your opinion, what information do you require in order to perform the proof? Bade: This definition is enough for me. I mean the definition of convergence. ... Researcher: Have you ever seen such theorem before? Bade: Yes, we have. When the proofs performed by the participants were examined, it was found that the proofs came under four categories; namely, correct proof (the proof was written correctly and the explanation is sufficient), invalid proof (the proof was written correctly, but the explanation is insufficient), incorrect proof (the proof was written incorrectly) and incomplete proof (the proof wasn’t written completely and it remained incomplete). The participants’ states of performing proof are given in Table 5. Table 5. Proofs performed by the pre-service teachers Correct proof Invalid proof Incorrect proof Bade Banu Aydın Cemil Burak Ceren Incomplete proof When the performed proofs are examined, it is observed that Bade and Aydın correctly wrote the proof. However, Bade was able to explain the operations that she performed, that is to say, she was aware of what she wrote, whereas Aydın was not able to explain the operations that he performed. In the conducted interviews, it was observed that Aydın was not aware of the statements that he wrote since he memorized the proof of the theorem. Figure 1 shows the proof performed by Bade and the conversation made by the researcher with Bade in order to understand whether or not she performed the proof consciously. -51- The Relationship among Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptual Knowledge…M. Doruk & A. Kaplan Figure 1. Proof performed by Bade Researcher: What is 𝑛0 breakpoint of (𝑠𝑛 + 𝑡𝑛 ) sequence if it has any? Bade: There is 𝑛0 . I wrote it here, too. We say every n>𝑛0 . Our n will be bigger than both 𝑛0 and 𝑛1 . Therefore, we chose the maximum one between 𝑛0 and 𝑛1 . Researcher: Why did you choose the maximum one? Bade: Because it must be bigger than even the biggest one in order for it to include it. For instance, let us leave out the two terms before 𝑛0 for 𝑠𝑛 sequence. Let us ignore it. Let us leave out the five terms before 𝑛1 for 𝑡𝑛 sequence. If I had chosen the minimum one, if I had ignored two of them, that would not have happened. I mean it would not have included the others. In order not to make a mistake, I choose the maximum one for it to include all of them. I choose the maximum one between 𝑛0 and 𝑛1 for it to include the largest set. Examining Bade’s statements, it was observed that she correctly proved the theorem by being aware of the statements that she wrote while proving the theorem. Bade developed a special systematic method while proving the theorem. This method resembles problem-solving steps and it is as follows: Understanding Analyzing the symbols Utulizing the defination Operations Check Correction Result While proving this theorem, Bade understood the statement of the theorem (understanding), wrote verbal statements in the theorem mathematically (analyzing the symbols), used the definition of convergence of sequence (utilizing the definition), utilized mathematical operations (operation), check the proof that she performed and whether or not there was an insufficiency or error (check) respectively. While checking her proof, Bade realized that she did not use the breakpoint of the (sn + t n ) sequence which enabled her to collectively use the inequalities that she obtained from the first and the second definitions. She corrected her mistake. Accordingly, she concluded that the statements that she wrote were valid for the terms after the biggest breakpoint among breakpoints in the first and second definitions (correction). She checked her proof once again and completed her proof (result). Bade’s statements about check and correction steps are given below. Bade: Let me check it for a moment... We forgot about the operation that we had performed on the finite number. Here, n is bigger than 𝑛1 [first line] whereas n is also bigger than 𝑛0 in the other one [second line]. Therefore, n will be bigger than the biggest value of both 𝑛0 and 𝑛1 . Since 𝑛0 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑛1 will be finite, the terms of 𝑠𝑛 + 𝑡𝑛 sequence converging towards s+t will be infinite. It will be bigger than the terms that are bigger than 𝑛0 which is included in s neighborhood as well as the terms that are bigger than 𝑛1 which is included in t neighborhood. As a result, the infinite terms are within s+t neighborhood. -52- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 45-57, 1 April, 2015 Figure 2 shows the proof performed by Aydın and excerpts from the conversation made by the researcher with Aydın in order to understand whether or not he performed the proof consciously. Figure 2. Proof performed by Aydın Researcher: What is your purpose in writing 𝑛3 = 𝑚𝑎𝑥{𝑛1 , 𝑛2 } here? Aydın: I do not know why I did that. I remembered it from the courses. It is not a property. What we have in the result are two different values: 𝑛1 and 𝑛2 . It is not clear which one we must take or which one is bigger. I think we put the bigger one into the operation in order to prove the theorem. Researcher: Why do you put the bigger one into the operation? Aydın: We have never asked our teacher about it. Researcher: Why did you write the statement with the maximum one in your proof? Aydın: Memorization. Previous knowledge. It is memorization because I have seen it before. Although Aydın correctly wrote the proof as figure, he performed the proof without being aware of what he wrote. In view of the conducted interview, it was found that Aydın’s knowledge on this proof came from only memorization. While performing the proof, he exhibited a result-oriented approach and did not consider the transitions, connections and key ideas among the statements. He performed the proof without being aware of what he wrote. Cemil was not able to complete his proof. While performing the proof, he tried to use the definition of convergence of sequence, other similar theorems that he knew and his memorized knowledge was the most striking feature. The proof performed by Cemil is given below. Figure 3. Proof performed by Cemil It was found that Ceren, who was among other participants, only paid attention to the operational part of the proof while performing the proof. It was observed that she did not paid attention to the fact that in which cases that the inequalities she wrote during performing the proof were valid, and consequently, she did not write the condition that would allow for collectively using the two inequalities. Since the written inequalities would not be valid in this -53- The Relationship among Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptual Knowledge…M. Doruk & A. Kaplan case, the performed proof was evaluated as incorrect. In view of Ceren’s proof, it is considered that she was not able to use the definition correctly since she did not comprehend the concept of convergence of sequence. The proof performed by Ceren is given in Figure 4. Figure 4. Proof performed by Ceren While performing the proof, Burak and Banu correctly used the definition of convergence of sequence. However, like other participants, they did not question under which conditions the statements that they wrote were correct. If they had questioned under which conditions that they could perform this operation while combining the two inequalities, their proofs would have been correct. Since the proofs performed by them were invalid according to the definition of convergence of sequence, their proofs were evaluated as incorrect. This condition is observed in Burak’s proof that is given in Figure 5. Figure 5. Proof performed by Burak Results and Discussion In regard to the first question of the research, questions were asked in order to reveal pre-service teachers’ level of conceptual knowledge regarding the definition of convergence of sequence. At the end of the study, it was found that a great majority of the participants had a considerably low level of conceptual knowledge regarding the subject of convergence of sequence. It was found that only one pre-service teacher’s (Bade) knowledge was at the conceptual knowledge level. The concept of convergence of sequence is a concept that is difficult for students to learn (Akbayır, 2004; Akgün & Duru, 2007). Furthermore, since the university-level mathematics courses are given with the classic lecture method as follows: definition→theorem→proof (Weber, 2004) or theorem→proof→examples (Almeida, 2003), many students cannot learn the concepts completely and form relations between the concepts (Yıldız, 2006). When looked at from this viewpoint, it can be considered that the knowledge of the students who participated in the study remained at knowledge level, and they were not able to understand the related concept. Accordingly, it can be suggested that the lecturers who -54- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 45-57, 1 April, 2015 are responsible for giving the related courses must review their instructional methods and use different instructional methods. The statements of the pre-service teachers were examined in order to find an answer to the second question of the research. Pre-service teachers’ statements about their opinions on proof fell under positive and negative categories. It was found that the majority of the pre-service teachers had negative opinions regarding proof. Most of the participants regard proof as an unnecessary and meaningless activity that must be memorized. This result supports the findings of the studies in which most of the students had negative opinions against proof (Moralı et al., 2006). Among the pre-service teachers, only Bade has a positive opinion regarding proof. In her statements, Bade emphasizes that proofs reinforce her conceptual knowledge and increase retention. Bade’s statement corresponds with the research result that argues that students’ mathematical knowledge develops and matures via mathematical proofs (Kitcher, 1984). In order to find an answer to the third question of the research, pre-service teachers were requested to prove again a theorem that they had proven before. It was found that most of the participants failed in performing proof. In view of this, it can be stated that the pre-service teachers’ proof skills are at a considerably low level. It was found that only one participant (Bade) succeeded in performing proof and developed a proof strategy for herself. This method reminds us of Polya’s (Polya, 1945) problem solving steps. This result supports the research result of Furinghetti & Morselli (2009) arguing that there is a strong relationship between proof process and problem solving and this process is composed of Polya’s steps of understanding the problem, devising a plan, carrying out the plan and looking back. This result, which was obtained in the study, shows parallelism with the research results, arguing that the students failed in performing proof (Arslan, 2007; Arslan & Yıldız, 2010; Coşkun, 2009; Moore, 1994). Furthermore, it was found that the majority of pre-service teachers were not able to perform the proof although the theorem that they were required to prove was a theorem that they had proven before. This result supports Weber’s (2001) research result arguing, “The fact that the pre-service teachers remember a theorem or a concept does not guarantee that they will perform the proof.” In order to reach the aim of the research, the answers to the research questions were evaluated with a holistic approach, and an attempt was made to discover the patterns among the results. The participant who had an adequate level of conceptual knowledge on the convergence of sequence succeeded in performing proof whereas other participants with an inadequate level of conceptual knowledge on the convergence of sequence failed in performing proof. This condition calls to mind that there is a close relationship between conceptual knowledge and proof skill. This result corresponds with the research results arguing that lack of conceptual knowledge constitutes a difficulty in performing proof (Gibson, 1998). When the relationship between opinions regarding proof and proof skill was taken into account, it was observed that the participant who had a positive opinion regarding proof succeeded in performing proof whereas other pre-service teachers with negative opinions regarding proof failed in performing proof. Therefore, it can be stated that opinions regarding proof have a connection with proof skill. This result, which was obtained in the study, corresponds with the research results arguing that students’ opinions regarding proof affect their activities related with proof (Furinghetti & Morselli, 2009; Weber, 2004). Lastly, when the participants’ academic success in the related course, their opinions regarding proof and their proof skills were examined, it could be said that students’ course success was not reflected on their proof skills and opinions regarding proof. Although the participants of the research were selected among the preservice teachers who successfully passed the related course, the majority of the participants -55- The Relationship among Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptual Knowledge…M. Doruk & A. Kaplan failed in performing proof. This result corresponds with the fact that proof is a subject which is accepted with resistance even by successful students (Weber, 2004). References Akbayır, K. (2004). In identifying character of series university 2nd year students’ mistakes and misunderstandings of concepts in some convergence criterions. Kastamonu University Journal of Education, 12(2), 442–450. Akgün L., & Duru, A. (2007). Misunderstanding and difficulties in learning sequence and sequence: a case study. Journal of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education Series D: Research in Mathematical Education, 11(2), 75–85. Almeida, D. (2003). Engendering proof attitudes: Can the genesis of mathematical knowledge teach us anything?. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34(4), 479-488. Altıparmak, K., & Öziş, T. (2005). An investigation upon mathematical proof and development of mathematical reasoning. Ege Journal of Education, 6(1), 25-37. Arslan S., & Yıldız, C. (2010). Reflections from the Experiences of 11th Graders during the Stages of Mathematical Thinking. Education and Science, 35(156), 17-31. Arslan, Ç. (2007). The development of elementary school students on their reasoning and proof ideas (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Uludag University, Institute of Social Sciences, Bursa. Chazan, D. (1993). High school geometri students for their views of empirical evidence and mathematical proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 359-387. Conradie J., & Frith, J. (2000), Comprehension Tests in Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42, 225-235. Coşkun, F. (2009). Correlation between secondary school pupils’ van hiele levels of understanding of geometry and their proof writing skill (M. Sc. Thesis). Karadeniz Technical University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Trabzon. De Villiers, M. (1990). The role and function of proof in mathematics. Pythagoras, 24, 17-24. Furinghetti F., & Morselli, F. (2009). Teachars’ Beleifs and the Teaching of Proof, Proceedings of ICME Study 19: Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education, Taipei, Taiwan. Gibson, D. (1998). Students’ use of diagrams to develop proofs in an introductory analysis course. In A.H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), CBMS ıssues in mathematics education, USA: The American Mathematical Society, 284–307. Güven, B., Çelik, D., & Karataş, İ. (2005). High school students’ sufficiencies of doing mathematical proofs. Journal of Contemporary Education, 30, 319-332. Heinze A., & Reiss, K. (2003). Reasoning and Proof: Methodological Knowledge as a Component of Proof Competence. In M.A. Mariotti (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Bellaria, Italy. Jones, K. (2000). The student experience of mathematical proof at university level. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31 (1), 53-60. Kitcher, P. (1984). The nature of mathematical knowledge. New York: Oxford university press. Knapp, J. (2005). Learning to prove in order to prove to learn, [Online]: (2005). Retrieved from 11.11.2010, http://mathpost.asu.edu/~sjgm/issues/2005_spring/SJGM_knapp.pdf. Knuth, E. J. (2002). Teachers’ conceptions of proof in the context of secondary school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 61-88. -56- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 45-57, 1 April, 2015 Mansi, K. E. (2003). Reasoning and Geometric Proof in Mathematics Education (M. Sc. Thesis). North Carolina State University. Moore, R. C. (1990). College students’ difficulties in learning to do mathematical proofs (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Georgia, Athens. 01 Moore, R. C. (1994). Making the transition to formal proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 249-266. Moralı, S., Uğurel, I., Türnüklü, E., & Yeşildere, S. (2006). The Views Of The Mathematics Teachers On Proving. Kastamonu University Journal of Education, 14(1), 147-160. Morris, A. K. (2007). Factors affecting pre-service teachers' evaluations of the validity of students' mathematical arguments in classroom contexts. Cognition and Instruction, 25(4), 479-522. Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method (5th ed.). New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Raman, M. J. (2003). Key ideas: What are they and how can they help us understand how people view proof? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 319-325. Rav, Y. (1999). Why do we prove theorems?. Philosophia Mathematica, 7(1), 5–41. Ross, K. A. (1998). The place of Algorithms and Proofs in School Mathematics. Doing and Proving. March, 252-255. Selden, A. & Selden, J. (2003). Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 4-36. Weber, K. (2001). Student difficulty in constructing proofs: The need for strategic knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48, 101-119. Weber, K. (2004). Traditional instruction in advanced mathematics courses: a case study of one professor’s lectures and proofs in an introductory real analysis course. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 23, 115–133. Weber, K. (2006). Investigating and teaching the processes used to construct proofs. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education, 6, 197-232. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. Ankara: Seçkin Publications. Yıldız, G. (2006). Prepairing and applications of comprehension tests for theorems and proofs in calculus courses and students views (M. Sc. Thesis). Gazi University, Institute of Education Sciences, Ankara. -57- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE) Vol. 5(1), pp. 58-76, 1 April, 2015 Available online at http://mije.mevlana.edu.tr/ http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.76.5.1 Effect of Seniority on Teachers’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Meta-Analysis Cevat Elma1 Eğitim Fakültesi, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Samsun, Türkiye. Tufan Aytaç2 Eğitim Fakültesi, Bozok Üniversitesi, Yozgat, Türkiye. The basic purpose of this study is to determine the varying effect sizes of teachers’ perception and opinions about organizational citizenship behavior in accordance with their seniority. 17 studies Received in revised form: deemed meeting the inclusion criteria were chosen from 30 MA 23.03.2015 and PhD theses and dissertations in YOK National Thesis Archive dealing with teachers’ opinions about organizational citizenship Accepted: 25.03.2015 behavior in Turkey to be used in this study. Total number of samples in this study is 8432 (teachers); 3448 of which are teachers Key words: with 1-10 years of seniority where as 4984 of which are teachers Organizational citizenship, with 10 and above years of seniority. In addition, several variables meta-analysis, seniority, teacher such as publication year, the region used for the research, educational level, scale type and researcher’s gender that could not be included in the evaluation as a moderator in primary researches were analyzed. In accordance with the results of this study, an effect size with statistical significance at an insignificant level was determined on the part of teachers with 11 years of seniority and over according to fixed effect model (d= -0,133) and random effect model (d=-0,180). In the consequence of the moderator analysis conducted, moderator effects of the region in which the research was conducted (p=0,000), educational level (p=0,002), the scale type used in the studies (ready or developed) (p=0,000) and researcher’s gender (p=0,018) were determined. Moreover, effect sizes obtained from the studies showed that seniority difference has a tendency to increase by year. As a result, seniority may not be recommended to be used as a significant variable in those future studies dealing with teachers’ opinions about organizational citizenship behavior. Article history Received: 16.10.2014 Introduction Many researches focusing on various dimensions of executive and organizational fields are conducted to ensure that organizations could operate efficiently and effectively. Majority of these researches deals with organizational structure and organizational behaviors. Within this context, one of the subjects under the heading of organizational behaviors 1 2 cevat.elma@omu.edu.tr tufana60@gmail.com Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 58-76, 1 April, 2015 attracting the attention of the academia has recently been Organizational Citizenship Behaviors (OCB) of employees. Indeed, OCB aims to protect the organization from destructive and unwanted behaviors which prevent it from operating properly, to improve employees’ abilities and skills; and to increase the performance and efficiency of the organization through establishing effectual coordination. In this sense, OCB is closely related to organization’s achievements such as taking advantage in a competitive environment, attaining a learning identity, adapting to its environment, loyalty, work, sacrifice and commitment of the employees (Organ & Ryan, 1995; Basım and Şeşen, 2006; Martinez, 2012). The most important reason for OCB’s rapid proliferation and acceptance of it in the field of education is the fact that it is thought to make a lot of contributions to organizational efficiency and performance (Bogler & Somech, 2005; DiPaola & Tschannen-Moran, 2001). Looking at those employees working for efficient organizations, it may be said that they perform tasks other than and go beyond those tasks, roles and responsibilities written in their job description. In recent years during which competition among education organizations and particularly among schools has been rapidly increasing, there existed a strong need for managers and teachers exhibiting organizational citizenship behaviors. Teachers are expected to perform voluntary tasks aimed at improving schools moving beyond their function as teachers in classes as officially prescribed in their job descriptions. Within this context, creating organizational citizenship behavior and ensuring the sustainability of this behavior has increasingly been of vital importance in increasing the efficiency of schools (Özdemir, 2010; Somech & Bogler, 2002). However, there are various obstacles in teachers’ way to exhibit organizational citizenship behavior. Various factors such as over competitive atmosphere in schools, bad management of organizations, unsuccessful leadership, bad work designs, negative effects of psychosocial working environment on communication and cooperation processes, excessive frequency of inspection on teachers and the existence of a structure of an over autocratic nature preclude teachers from exhibiting organizational citizenship behavior (DiPaola&Tschannen-Moran, 2001; Yaylacı, 2004, Yıldırım, Uzum, & Yıldırım, 2012). Within this scope, the contribution of OCB to the efficiency of a school, which is a social organization with strong informal aspects, where activities based on cooperation could be conducted, may be regarded as obvious. Organizational Citizenship Behaviors (OCB) The concept of organizational citizenship behavior, which was first mentioned by Bateman and Organ (1983), has recently attracted the attention of academia in literature on organization and its management and it has been used to refer to the behavior characterized as extra role behavior during examination of relations concerning job satisfaction. In general, OCB refers to extra role behavior, which is not included in official job descriptions; is beyond the job requirements and exceeding the job expectations; and exhibited voluntarily to contribute to the efficient operation of the organization (Karaman & Aylan, 2012; Organ, 1995, 1997; Podsakoff et al., 2000; Robbins & Judge, 2012; Sezgin, 2005). In other words, OCB is exhibited by employees voluntarily regardless of orders without any pressure and that contributes to the organization (Yılmaz & Çokluk-Bökeoğlu, 2008). In different studies, OCB is described through different names such as surplus behavior, extra role behavior, social organization behavior, organizational citizenship, prosocial organizational behavior, good soldier syndrome, organizational spontaneity or civil organizational behavior (Podsakoff et al. 2000; Turnispeed & Murkison, 2000; Yaylacı, 2004). In problematic situations about the job, OCB covers helping colleagues to solve the problem faced, accepting orders without causing any problem, performing unexpected obligatory tasks without complaints, helping with keeping the workplace clean and in order, talking to other people and organizations about the -59- Effect of Seniority on Teachers’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior…C. Elma & T. Aytaç job, organization and its managers in a positive manner, creating an organizational atmosphere in which conflicts and distractions are absent or minimized, and protecting resources of the organization (Bateman & Organ, 1983; Buluç, 2008). OCB contributes to the social and psychological atmosphere of the organization as a personal behavior performed on a voluntary basis, which also helps the organization with attainment of its goals (Organ, 1997). Robbins and Judge (2012) state that those employees, who exhibit the behavior of a “good citizen”, support their colleagues in their team; share the extra work load voluntarily; avoid unnecessary arguments; respect both the soul of the work and written instructions and rules regarding it; and welcome the obstacles they face during performance of their tasks. According to Van Dyne, Graham and Dienesch (1994) those teachers with more years of seniority develop strong attachment to the organization they work for, they have a sense of belonging towards the organization and they have a more self-sacrificing attitude towards it. Thus, exhibition of OCB by these teachers is facilitated. In a number of studies, dimensions of OCB are classified as positive behavior (courtesy) exhibited by members who are affected by each other’s work and decisions; providing other employees who face problems with unreturned and voluntary help (Altruism-generosity); welcoming, willing to accept the problems, disturbances and pressures and maintain the positive position (gentlemanliness); perform role behaviors concerning the internal order of the organization such as sustain work, punctuality and protecting the resources in a better manner than that is expected from them (scrupulosity); commitment to the organization, active and accountable participation in the political life of the organization and developing new ideas (organizational and civil virtue) (Moorman & Blakely, 1995; Organ, 1997; Sezgin, 2005; Smith et al., 1983). Podsakoff et al. (2000) deal with OCB through seven dimensions: helping; fairness, organizational loyalty, organizational obedience, personal initiative, civil virtue and self-development. Teachers’ Organizational Citizenship Behaviors When the major characteristics of an efficient school are examined, reflections of OCB exhibited by its teachers can be observed. Certain behaviors may be given as examples for different dimensions of OCB: Consensus on the goals for team spirit dimension of OCB; continuous communication and respect for respect and tolerance dimensions of OCB; and develop employees in terms of their professional skills for participation dimension of OCB (Gökmen, 2011). Considering the positive effects of OCB on school organization, it may be said that it increases teachers’ organizational attachment and commitment, their sense of justice, and their motivation while it decreases the labor turnover. A low level of OCB exhibited by teachers and managers in schools has a negative influence on the performance of employees and it undermines the school’s efficiency (Christine, 2011). A school where OCB is dominant increases the efficiency of school managers and teachers and school’s culture; it makes the school more appealing and it therefore increases the organization’s ability to attract the attention of and maintain qualified managers and teachers. Behaviors such as helping colleagues, providing proposals aimed at developing the work and processes; being careful about being at work on time; making the best of working time; helping the new-comers with their socialization; attending the workplace more than that is necessary (i.e. take leave less than officially deserved); informing the management of absence in advance; helping the inspectors or managers with their works; supporting them; and providing new and creative proposals which would contribute to the organization are significant indicators of organizational citizenship (DiPaola et al., 2005). Those teachers who have strong OCB help their new colleagues voluntarily; take part in councils and committees; participate in extra activities not included on the schedule; help students during their leisure times; work -60- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 58-76, 1 April, 2015 efficiently in cooperation with their counterparts and attach priority to professional activities. They use their personal and professional skills to ensure that students and the school achieve their goals (DiPaola & Tschannen-Moran, 2001; Yancı & Sağlam, 2014). OCB is known to be in a positive relationship with personal and organizational performance and make contributions to organizational efficiency. OCB makes the school more appealing and it therefore increases the organization’s ability to attract the attention of and maintain qualified managers and teachers (Podsakoff & MacKenzie, 1997; Özdemir, 2010; Yücel & Kalaycı, 2009). Teachers’ OCB in schools is influenced by their personality, job requirements and managers’ leadership behaviors (Moorman, 1991; Özdemir, 2010; Podsakoff et al., 2000). In the consequence of various researches made, teachers who exhibit OCB have been found to have higher performance. Students’ success and teachers’ OCB have also been stated to have a close relationship and teachers’ efficiency to depend on teachers’ exhibition of OCB in schools (Bogler & Somech, 2005; DiPaola & Neves, 2009; Moorman, 1991). OCB is also affected by teachers’ attitude towards the school, behaviors and perception. Creating a strong organizational climate to support teachers’ exhibition of OCB facilitates the cooperation, information exchange, help and sharing between the teachers (Sezgin, 2005). OCB is vital both for information transfer and bringing positive behaviors. OCB behaviors which influence teachers’ relationship with managers, other teachers and parents have been recently put on the agenda frequently (Oğuz, 2010). Organizational Citizenship Behaviors within the Context of Various Variables Significance of OCB stems from its relationship with a number of variables such as job satisfaction, organizational justice, organizational commitment, organizational confidence, organization culture. Recent researches on OCB accept and suggest the positive effects of OCB on the employee and its organization; however, there are also researches which suggest that OCB has negative effects. In majority of researches conducted home and abroad, it is concluded that strong OCB of the employees has positive effects on the variable studied (Buluç, 2008; Karaman & Aylan, 2012; Moorman & Blakely, 1995; Sezgin, 2005; Vey & Campbell, 2004). OCB is one of the commonly studied research topics particularly in the field of education in Turkey and it has been discussed with its different aspects. Relationships between OCB and commitment, organizational health, organizational justice, job satisfaction and exhaustion have been considered in terms of various education levels and variables (Buluç, 2008; Çelik, 2007; Dönder, 2006; Karaman, Yücel & Dönder, 2008; Keskin, 2005; Mercan, 2006; Polat, 2007; Polat & Celep, 2008; Yaylacı, 2004; Yılmaz, 2010). Various researches conducted in Turkey teachers have been determined to have a mid-level positive opinion about OCB (Dönder, 2006; Keskin, 2005; Mercan, 2006; Yaylacı, 2004; Yılmaz & Çokluk- Bökeoğlu, 2008; Yılmaz & Taşdan, 2009). Researches conducted by Aktaş (2008), Altunbaş (2009) and Yancı and Sağlam (2014) on high school teachers suggest that they exhibit OCB at a high level. Seniority depends directly on the person’s positive feelings about its employer and these feelings may lead to promotion to a certain level (Sönmez, 2005). Research made by Yücel and Kalaycı (2009) suggests that those teachers who are working in a reliable working environment have a tendency to exhibit OCB. The most influential variable on OCB has been determined as teachers’ seniority in their school. In the meta-analysis of Organ and Ryan (1995) determiners of OCB have been determined as job satisfaction, perceived organizational justice, organizational commitment and leader support. According to Morrison (1994), as the seniority increases, trust and commitment felt by the employee towards his/her -61- Effect of Seniority on Teachers’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior…C. Elma & T. Aytaç employer increases and thus the employee perceives more number of tasks as covered in his role since he/she feels more responsible towards the organization. This way, he/she exhibits organizational citizenship behaviors. Even though no evidence has been found indicating that seniority is effective upon teachers’ OCB in school, demographic variables have been used and interpreted in majority of researches. Teachers’ OCB may be affected by factors such as their personal and professional qualities; particularly by their gender, age, term of office, marital status, socio-economic situation and the region where they work. In terms of variables determining OCB, along with demographic and behavioral qualities of the employees, their seniority may also be influential. Various researches show that teachers’ seniority is a significant predictor of teachers’ OCB (Bogler & Somech, 2005; DiPaola & Tschannen-Moran, 2001; İpek, 2012; Kidder, 2002; Martinez, 2012; Kidder, 2002; Suresh, & Venkatammal, 2010; Yener & Akyol, 2009; Yücel et al., 2009). Different researches in which OCB perceptions are compared in seniority in literature have different conclusions. Some of these researches in literature (Celep et al., 2004; Çetin et al., 2003; Ölçüm-Çetin, 2004; Polat, 2007; Yücel et al., 2009; Yılmaz, 2010) reveal that teachers’ perception and opinions vary depending upon their term of office. The research made by Yılmaz (2012) suggest that teachers’ opinions about OCB do not change depending on their gender, education, age and the number of teachers in school while it changes depending on teachers’ term of office. A number of researches in literature (Altınkurt & Yılmaz, 2012; Bulut, 2011; Büyüközkan, 2012; Polat, 2007) suggest that teachers’ seniority does not have any determining role in their exhibition of OCB; and that they exhibit OCB at same levels. Number of quantitative and qualitative researches made on OCB in the field of education in Turkey has been increasing day by day. In general, various scales and different independent variables (gender, branch, marital status, education level, faculty from which teachers graduate, seniority etc.) have been used in researches conducted on OCB in schools through quantitative and qualitative methods (Altınkurt & Yılmaz, 2012; Sezgin, 2005). As a result of these researches, some results have been obtained which are both statistically significant and insignificant; and varying in terms of subgroups of independent variables. Meta-analyses are required to synthesize the results of all these researches and to pave the way for new researches on teachers’ opinions about OCB (Organ & Ryan, 1995; Dar &Raja, 2014). Sezgin (2005) noted that these results should be synthesized because researches on OCB have given different conclusions. He also claimed that meta-analyses should be made in this respect. Increase in the studies on teachers’ opinions about OBC in schools witnessed recently led to a necessity to draw a common conclusion through considering the number of samples and synthesizing the results of these studies. Research made by Sezgin (2005) shows that there is a significant relationship between emotional commitment and OCB and emotional commitment of the employees is one of the factors leading to exhibition of OCB. Sezgin (2005) noted that these results should be synthesized because researches on OCB have given different conclusions. Increase in the studies on teachers’ opinions about OBC in schools witnessed recently led to a necessity to draw a common conclusion through considering the number of samples and synthesizing the results of these studies. Since no meta-analysis on teachers’ opinions about organizational citizenship has been found, this study would be an original one in both domestic and international sense and it would pave the way for new researches in this field in terms of different variables. Within this context, this study will examine the effect sizes of -62- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 58-76, 1 April, 2015 organizational citizenship and whether there is a difference between the effect sizes obtained through various variables ignored in primary researches. Purpose The aim of this study is to determine the effect of seniority on teachers' organizational citizenship behaviour. To this end, the effect size of teachers’ perceptions and opinions regarding to organizational citizenship behavior is determined. Also the variables of publication year, the region in which the research was carried on, school levels, scale type, and researcher’s gender are tested as moderator variables. Method Research Model Meta-analysis method, which is one of the methods used for synthesizing the research results, constitutes this research’s model. The process including analysis, synthesis and interpretation of quantitative findings obtained from independent studies through advanced statistical techniques is called meta-analysis. The aim of meta-analysis is to combine the findings of various studies conducted at different times in different places on the same subject so as to reveal the facts about this subject and to achieve the most reliable fact in quantitative terms through increasing the number of samples (Cumming, 2012: 205; Ellis, 2012: 5; Hartung, 2008: Kış, 2013; Aytaç, 2014; Yıldırım, 2014). In this study, CMA ver. 2.2.064 [Comprehensive Meta-Analysis], Statistical Package Software for Meta-Analysis was used for measurement of the effect sizes, variances and comparisons of the groups included in each study. SSPS ver. 20.0 package software was used for the rater reliability test. Data Collection MA theses and PhD dissertations on teachers’ perception and opinions about OCB in Turkey are the basic data sources of this study. The keywords “organizational citizenship” and “organizational allegiance” were used to find the related material and researches in the National Thesis Archive of the Council of Higher Education. Following the browsing process, 17 of 30 studies on the subject of this study were found convenient for inclusion criteria. In choosing the studies to be included in this study, the following criteria were used: (i) Criterion 1: Published or unpublished references: MA and PhD thesis. (ii) Criterion 2: Convenience of the research method of the study: The requirement for being an empirical study and use of tenure of office as an independent variable to obtain the effect size during the meta-analysis. (iii) Criterion 3: Existence of sufficient numeric data: Sample size, mean, standard deviation, F value, t value, X2 value, Kruskal Wallis value, Mann Whitney U data and p value were considered for teacher groups with 1-10 years of seniority and with 10 years of seniority and over to determine the effect sizes necessary for a meta-analysis. 13 studies were not included in the study on the grounds that they used different variables (managers, academic members) and they lacked the data necessary for a meta-analysis. The sample of this study is limited to 17 studies and MA theses and PhD dissertations on this subject written in Turkey between the years 2006 and 2012. -63- Effect of Seniority on Teachers’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior…C. Elma & T. Aytaç Research Reliability: A coding protocol which includes the name, content and data of this study has been created. A secondary researcher who has an in-depth knowledge on the “Study Content” section of the Rating Protocol and on what to do has rated using an inter-rater reliability form in order to ensure the inter-rater reliability. The first rater is the first researcher himself. Cohen’s Kappa statistics was used to ensure the inter-rater reliability and it was found to be 0,91. This result indicated almost a perfect compliance between the raters. Research validity: The validity and reliability of meta-analysis depends on the validity and reliability of the studies included in the research (Decoster, 2004; Petitti 2000). Also, screening and including all related studies which meet the criteria of meta-analysis increases the validity of the study. It has seen that, all thesis included in this study have carried out with valid and reliable research instruments. During this study, it was determined that the validity of data collection means had been ensured in all of 17 studies included in the meta-analysis. Data Analysis During the analysis of data, one of the methods of meta-analysis comparing group (fixed and random-effects models) Group differences method was used. During this study, the effect sizes, variances and comparisons of the groups included in each study were measured through CMA ver. 2.2.064 [Comprehensive Meta-Analysis], Statistical Package Software for Meta-Analysis (Borenstein et al., 2005). This study includes teachers with 1-10 years of seniority as sample group and teachers with 11 years of seniority and over as control group. Thus, positive status of the effect size is interpreted as being in favor of teachers with 1-10 years of seniority while its negative status is interpreted as being in favor of teachers with 11 years of seniority and over. SSPS ver. 20.0 package software was used for rater reliability test. Since the significance level was taken as 0,05 in the studies included in this study, the significance level of statistical analyses to be used in this study was determined as 0,05. Findings The related data covered in the studies included in this study were analyzed so as to find an answer to the question of the study. Findings concerning the publication bias, descriptive statistics, forest plot, fixed effect model findings, homogeneity test, random effect model findings and moderator analysis findings obtained from these analyses are given in this part. -64- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 58-76, 1 April, 2015 Funnel Plot of Standard Error by Std diff in means 0,0 0,1 Standard Error 0,2 0,3 0,4 -2,0 -1,5 -1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 Std diff in means Figure 1. Cone Dispersion Graphic of the Studies with Effect Size Data on Differences among Teachers’ Perceptions about Organizational Citizenship Behaviors in Accordance with Their Seniority As reflected in Figure 1, majority of 17 studies that were included in this study is located at upper side of the figure and very close to the conjoined effect size. In case there is no publication bias, studies are expected to expand symmetrically on both sides of vertical line showing the effect size (Borenstein et al, 2009: 284). Four of the studies (Altunbaş, 2009; Yancı, 2011; Zengin, 2011) that were included in this study to determine the conjoined effect size measured based on seniority variable went beyond the pyramid but they expanded around the top and the middle of the figure. If there was a publication bias in 17 studies that were included in this study, then, the majority of the studies will be located at the bottom of the figure or only at a single part of the vertical line (Borenstein et al, 2009: 284). In this sense, this cone graphic is one of the indicators of the absence of a publication bias in terms of the studies included in this study. Orwin’s Fail-Safe N Evaluation was also conducted to test the publication bias. Orwin’s FailSafe N calculates the number of studies that are likely to be excluded from the meta-analysis (Borenstein et al, 2009: 285). In the consequence of this analysis, Orwin’s Fail-Safe N was found to be 176. The necessary number of study for the average effect size found as 0,018 in the consequence of the meta-analysis to reach 0,01 (trivial) level, in other words, almost to zero effect size is 232. However, 17 studies which were included in this study are the total number of studies which meet the inclusion criteria and which are available among all the studies conducted on this subject in Turkey (qualitative, quantitative, theoretical etc.). Impossibility to attain 232 other studies may be accepted as another indicator of the absence of publication bias in this meta-analysis. Non-Conjoint Findings of Effect Size Analysis Based on Teachers’ Term of Office The effect sizes of teachers’ perception about OCB based on their term of office, standard error and its upper and lower limits based on a reliability level of 95% are given in an order from positive to the negative values on Table 1. Table 1. -65- Effect of Seniority on Teachers’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior…C. Elma & T. Aytaç Effect Sizes of Teachers’ Opinions about OCB Based on Their Term of Office Model Research Name Aktay, 2008 Altunbaş, 2009 Bulut, 2011 Büyüközkan, 2012 Dönder, 2006 Gökmen, 2011 Karagöz, 2007 Kepenek, 2008 Korkmaz, 2011 Köprülü, 2011 Özer, 2009 Öztürk, 2009 Polat, 2007 Uslu, 2011 Yancı, 2011 Yarım, 2009 Zengin, 2011 Fixed Random Effect Standard Lower size (d) error Variance limit -0,255 0,132 0,017 -0,513 0,321 0,110 0,012 0,105 -0,040 0,093 0,009 -0,221 Upper Limit Z-Value -1,935 0,003 2,920 0,536 -0,430 0,142 -0,035 -0,521 -0,125 -0,027 -0,018 0,084 -0,329 -0,273 -0,374 -0,039 -0,333 -0,489 -0,014 -0,745 -0,133 -0,180 0,075 -0,327 0,096 0,194 0,221 0,214 -0,127 -0,059 0,085 0,107 -0,126 -0,243 0,225 -0,523 0,087 0,060 0,056 0,099 0,113 0,113 0,122 0,067 0,103 0,109 0,234 0,074 0,105 0,125 0,122 0,113 0,024 0,061 0,003 0,010 0,013 0,013 0,015 0,004 0,011 0,012 0,055 0,006 0,011 0,016 0,015 0,013 0,001 0,004 -0,145 -0,715 -0,346 -0,249 -0,258 -0,047 -0,530 -0,487 -0,833 -0,184 -0,539 -0,734 -0,252 -0,967 -0,179 -0,299 -0,625 -5,271 -1,111 -0,242 -0,152 1,257 -3,197 -2,503 -1,599 -0,525 -3,156 -3,899 -0,111 -6,582 -5,640 -2,952 Of pNumber Samples Value Female Male 0,053 161 91 0,004 162 174 0,667 250 218 0,532 0,000 0,267 0,809 0,879 0,209 0,001 0,012 0,110 0,600 0,002 0,000 0,912 0,000 0,000 0,003 422 206 166 132 86 536 139 145 23 263 115 209 136 297 4319 4319 1277 217 150 192 308 391 308 203 93 586 433 95 134 114 4210 4210 In accordance with Table 1, the standardized mean difference (SMD=SOF) based on seniority in these 17 studies, varies from -0,745 in favor of teachers with 1-10 years of seniority to 0,321 in favor of teachers with 1-10 years of seniority. A statistically significant difference (p <0,05) was found in 8 studies while no significant difference was determined in 9 studies. The confidence interval of 17 studies was also found to vary from -0,967 to 0,536. Forest Plot of the Studies Including Data on Seniority The forest plot of 17 studies included in this study and consisting of the data concerning seniority is given in Figure 2. -66- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 58-76, 1 April, 2015 Studyname Statistics for each study Std diff in means and 95% CI Std diff Standard Lower Upper in means error Variance limit limit Z-Value p-Value Aktay, 2008 Altunbaş, 2009 Bulut, 2011 Büyüközkan, 2012 Dönder, 2006 Gökmen, 2011 Karagöz, 2007 Kepenek, 2008 Korkmaz, 2011 Köprülü, 2011 Özer, 2009 Öztürk, 2009 Polat, 2007 Uslu, 2011 Yancı, 2011 Yarım, 2009 Zengin, 2011 Fixed -0,255 0,321 -0,040 -0,035 -0,521 -0,125 -0,027 -0,018 0,084 -0,329 -0,273 -0,374 -0,039 -0,333 -0,489 -0,014 -0,745 -0,133 0,132 0,110 0,093 0,056 0,099 0,113 0,113 0,122 0,067 0,103 0,109 0,234 0,074 0,105 0,125 0,122 0,113 0,024 0,017 0,012 0,009 0,003 0,010 0,013 0,013 0,015 0,004 0,011 0,012 0,055 0,006 0,011 0,016 0,015 0,013 0,001 -0,513 0,105 -0,221 -0,145 -0,715 -0,346 -0,249 -0,258 -0,047 -0,530 -0,487 -0,833 -0,184 -0,539 -0,734 -0,252 -0,967 -0,179 0,003 0,536 0,142 0,075 -0,327 0,096 0,194 0,221 0,214 -0,127 -0,059 0,085 0,107 -0,126 -0,243 0,225 -0,523 -0,087 -1,935 2,920 -0,430 -0,625 -5,271 -1,111 -0,242 -0,152 1,257 -3,197 -2,503 -1,599 -0,525 -3,156 -3,899 -0,111 -6,582 -5,640 0,053 0,004 0,667 0,532 0,000 0,267 0,809 0,879 0,209 0,001 0,012 0,110 0,600 0,002 0,000 0,912 0,000 0,000 -1,00 -0,50 0,00 0,50 1,00 11 year and over 1-10 years between Figure 2. Forest plot of the effect sizes of teachers’ perception about OCB based on seniority variable When Figure 2 is examined, a difference lower than zero in favor of teachers with 11 years of seniority and over is observed. The fact that there is a difference in favor of teachers with 11 years of seniority and over may be interpreted as a sign of the fact that they perceive and encounter OCB more in proportion to male teachers. Findings of Effect Size Meta-Analysis of Teachers’ Seniority Conjoined in Accordance with Fixed and Random Effect Models The average effect size of the perception of teachers with 1-10 years of seniority and teachers with 11 years of seniority and over about OCB conjoined in accordance with fixed and random effect models (without subtracting the outliers), standard error and its upper and lower limits based on a confidence interval of 95% are given on Table 2. -67- Effect of Seniority on Teachers’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior…C. Elma & T. Aytaç Table 2. Findings of Effect size Meta-Analysis Based on Seniority Variable Conjoined in Accordance with the Fixed Effect Model And Random Effect Model and Homogeneity Test Model Fixed effect Random effect Effect size and confidence interval of 95% Heterogenity Number of studies Point estimate Standard Lower error Variance limit Upper limit 17 -0,133 0,024 0,001 -0,179 -0,087 -5,640 17 -0,180 0,061 0,004 -0,299 -0,060 -2,952 Z-value Qvalue df (Q) 99,522 16 I2 83,923 On Table 2, the average effect size value obtained from the effect size values of the studies included in this study based on seniority variable in accordance with fixed effect model was calculated as d=-0,133 whereas the standard error of the average effect size, the upper limit and lower limit of confidence interval of the average effect size was calculated as SE=0,024; 0,087; and -0,179, respectively. Data obtained from 17 studies included in this study based on the calculations showed that teachers with 11 years of seniority and over experience OCB more than teachers with 1-10 years of seniority in accordance with fixed effect model. However, since the effect size value is lower than 0,20, it was determined as an effect even less than the lower level in accordance with Cohen’s classification (Cohen, 1988, 40). According to Lipsey’s classification, there is an effect even less than the lower level when the effect size is lower than 0,15. The classification of Thalheimer and Cook (2002) shows that there is an insignificant difference (-0,15-0,15). When statistical significance is calculated according to Z test, Z=-5,640 was found. The obtained result was found to have statistical significance with p=0,005. Only 1 of the 17 studies included in this study based on seniority variable have remained within the upper and lower limits of effect size and reached a result close to the existent effect size whereas the remaining 16 studies have remained over or below these limits. As for the homogeneity test, in other words, Q-statistics, Q was calculated as 99,522. 16 degrees of freedom at a significance level of 95% from x2 table was found to be 7,96. The hypothesis on the absence of homogeneity in terms of the distribution of effect sizes was rejected in fixed effect model because Q-statistics value (Q=99,522) exceeded the critical chi square distribution value (x2 0,95 =7,96) with a degree of freedom of 16. Thus, effect sizes distribution was determined to be heterogeneous in accordance with fixed effect model. I2, which was developed as a supplement to Q statistics, put forth a clearer result concerning heterogeneity (Petticrew & Roberts, 2006; Yıldırım, 2014). I2 shows the rate of total variance about the effect size. As opposed to Q-statistics, I2 Statistics are not affected by number of studies. During the interpretation of I2 25% indicates a low-level heterogeneity, 50% indicates a mid-level heterogeneity and 75% shows a high-level heterogeneity (Cooper et al, 2009, 263). Since a level of heterogeneity close to a high-level heterogeneity was found in the consequence of the homogeneity for the purpose of seniority variable (Q and I2) the model to be used for conjoining process was transformed into a random model. The results of the moderator analysis made to put forth the reasons for this heterogeneity are given on Table 3. Tablo 3. Categorical Moderator Results about the Effect of Seniority on OCB Moderator Education level Primary/secondary Primary/secondary High school Region of the study k d SE %95 CI 4 8 5 -0,031 -0,210 -0,060 0,050 0,032 0,047 [-0,129; 0,068] [-0,273; -0,146] [-0,152; 0,032] -68- Q 12,158 Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 58-76, 1 April, 2015 Eastern Anatolia 3 -0,191 0,052 [-0,294; -0,089] 26,090 Central Anatolia 3 -0,025 0,064 [-0,150; 0,100] Marmara 7 -0,123 0,045 [-0,211; -0,035] Mediterranean 2 -0,037 0,045 [-0,124; 0,051] Aegean 2 -0,433 0,072 [-0,574; -0,292] Scale Type 16,301 Ready 12 -0,226 0,033 [-0,291; 0,069] Developed 5 -0,036 0,034 [-0,102; 0,030] Researcher’s gender 5,565 Male 9 -0,077 0,033 [-0,142; -0,011] Female 8 0,188 0,033 [-0,253; -0,123] *p<.05 Note: k=number of studies, d=Cohen’s d, SE= Standard Error, CI= Confidence Interval, Q=heterogeneity among the studies Comparison analyses were made for those studies whose number of subgroups is two and more. In the consequence of the moderator analysis conducted, the effect sizes were found to vary depending on the education level (p=0,002). Results of the studies conducted at primary/secondary and high school levels and only at high school level indicated an insignificant result (primary/secondary and high school: -0,031 and high school: -0,060) in favor of teachers with 11 and above years of seniority; effect size in studies conducted only at primary/secondary school level as sample increases (-0,091; -0,026). Studies in regions where the provinces in which this research was conducted are located (p=0,000) were determined to influence the effect sizes. Researches made in all regions indicated findings in favor of teachers with 11 and above years of seniority, while particularly the effect size of researches conducted in Aegean region is higher (Aegean: -0,043). The moderator effects of the scale type (ready or developed) (p=0,000) and researcher’s gender (p=0,018) were also determined. In studies which were conducted through ready scales, a difference in favor of teachers with 11 years of seniority and over was observed. Direction of the difference was observed to change in favor of teachers with 11 years of seniority and over when the researcher was female. Effect Sizes of Studies 0,60 0,50 0,40 0,30 0,20 0,10 0,00 -0,10 -0,20 -0,30 -0,40 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Research Year Figure 3. Effect Sizes Meta-Regression Results based on the Years in Which the Research Was Conducted. As reflected in Figure 3, an increase tendency in seniority difference by years in terms of the effect sizes of the studies is observed. -69- Effect of Seniority on Teachers’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior…C. Elma & T. Aytaç Discussion, Results and Recommendations In this study, 17 effect sizes related to 17 studies constituting a sample of 8432 people were calculated. A statistically significant difference was detected in 8 studies while no significant difference was found in 9 studies. In fixed effect model, as a result of the conjoining process, a statistically significant effect size of 0,133 in favor of teachers with 11 years of seniority and over was found. This result may be regarded as low and insignificant in accordance with the classification of Cohen (1988) and Thalheimer and Cook (2002). In random effect model, as a result of the conjoining process, a statistically significant effect size of -0,180 in favor of teachers with 11 years of seniority and over was found. This result may also be regarded as low and insignificant in accordance with the classification of Cohen (1988) and Thalheimer and Cook (2002). When these results are evaluated together, they show that there is a difference which may be regarded as insignificant among teachers’ perceptions about OCB in schools in terms of seniority variable. Thus, not using seniority as a variable in future studies may be brought to the agenda. Since there is not any other metaanalysis regarding teachers’ perception about teachers’ OCB based on seniority variable, it was not possible to compare and contrast these results. In this study, teachers’ opinions do not vary depending on their term of office. Researches conducted by Altınkurt and Yılmaz (2012), Dar and Raja (2014) and Polat (2007) also support this result. The result of this indicating that opinions of teachers with 11 years of seniority and over are positive about OCB even if it is at an insignificant level is in parallel with the results of researches made by Celep, Polat, Elbir and Yapıcı (2004), Oğuz (2010) and Ölçüm-Çetin (2004). Researches of Gökmen (2011), Köprülü (2011), Yılmaz (2010) and Yıldırım et al. (2012) suggest that teachers with 11 years of seniority and over have a more positive attitude towards OCB than those teachers with 1-10 years of seniority. Celep et al. (2004), Çetin et al. (2003) and Köprülü (2011) and Yılmaz (2010), in their studies, found teachers’ positive attitude increases as their years of seniority increase. As the duration of work in school increases, an increase in the organizational citizenship level including conscience, altruism and civil virtue is observed. Sezgin (2005) showed that teachers who are new in their profession and teachers who are in later periods of their seniority are not very successful in exhibiting OCB. Various researches put forward the fact that inexperience and absence of time necessary for adopting the culture in the organization may prevent new teachers from exhibiting OCB (Celep et al., 2004; Çetin et al., 2003; Dönder, 2006). Eres (2010) in his research suggests that teachers with 21 years of seniority and over exhibit less OCB than those teachers with less years of seniority. Possibility of withdrawal behavior exhibited due to the idea “I have made all I could up to now” and willingness to retire to be one of the reasons of this result should be taken into account. A significant difference was found among teachers’ opinions about their frequency of exhibiting OCB and seniority variable. Perceptions of teachers with 11-20 years of seniority and perceptions of those with 21 years of seniority and over were determined to be different. This study indicated that perceptions of teachers with 21 years of seniority and over about OCB exhibition is higher than perceptions of teachers with 11-20 years of seniority. Problems such as increase in the number of student for whom each teacher is responsible; differences in social expectations; technological inefficiencies in schools; teachers’ perception that their income is low may prevent teachers with less years of seniority from exhibiting OCB (Yancı & Sağlam, 2014; DiPaola, Tarter & Hoy, 2005; Wagner & Rush, 2000). Within the context of the results of this study, it may be said that creating working conditions which will encourage new teachers exhibit OCB and an efficient communicative and cooperative atmosphere considering their social and psychological needs will be beneficial. -70- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 58-76, 1 April, 2015 Within the context of the results of this study, a decrease tendency in teachers’ years of seniority difference in terms of effect sizes of researches based on research year moderator is observed. One of the findings of this study reflecting the fact that there is not any significant difference among teachers’ perception about OCB depending on seniority variable may suggest that it will not be possible to use this variable as a significant independent one in future studies. Results obtained from recent studies support this finding as well. As a result, supporting teachers in exhibiting OCB, school management’s efforts to bring trust, cooperation, commitment, helping each other, conscience and courtesy and rewarding teachers exhibiting OCB may be regarded as significant factors ensuring both the school’s and its teachers’ efficiency. Determining a common vision and creating a more interactive and sharing culture based on trust may increase the exhibition of OCB. In this respect, transfer of information and experience by more experienced and successful teachers into new and inexperienced teachers may be regarded as an important drive. To that end, on-the-job training provided for teachers who are in their earlier period of seniority may be provided in a way to enhance their OCB understanding. Further studies to reveal and discuss the reasons for the low level of difference among teachers’ perceptions about OCB based on seniority variable in schools and for the fact that teachers with 11 years of seniority and over exhibit more OCB than teachers with 1-10 years of seniority even if it is at a low level may be recommended. Further meta-analyses may be conducted using various variables predicting OCB such as gender, marital status and school type. References (The symbol of * refers to the studies included in the meta-analysis). *Aktay, A. (2008). Yönetici ve öğretmenlerin değer tercihleri ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Yeditepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul. Aktas, H. G. (2008). Ögretmenlerde denetim odağı ve örgütsel vatandaşlık (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Afyon. Altınkurt, Y., &Yılmaz, K. (2012). Okul yöneticilerinin kullandığı güç kaynakları ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ılişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 12 (3), 1833-1852. *Altunbaş, A. (2009). Öğretmenlerin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları ve çalışma değerlerinin analizi (Altındağ İlçesi Örneği). (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Yeditepe Üniversitesi, İstanbul. Aytaç, T. (2014). The effect of school type on intimidation (mobbing) experienced by teachers in schools: A meta-analysis. Educational Research and Reviews, 9 (20), 1055-1064. Basım, H. N. ve Şeşen, H. (2006). Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ölçeği uyarlama ve karşılaştırma çalışması. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 61(4), 84-101. Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26 (4), 587–595. -71- Effect of Seniority on Teachers’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior…C. Elma & T. Aytaç Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2005). Organizational citizenship behavior in school, How does it relate to participation in decision making?, Journal of Educational Administration, 43 (5), 420-438. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex-UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Buluç, B. (2008). Ortaöğretim okullarında örgütsel sağlık ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişki. Türk Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6 (4), 571–602. *Bulut, M. Ş. (2011). İlköğretim okullarındaki performans yönetimi uygulamaları ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişki. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sakarya. *Büyüközkan, A. S. (2012). Öğretmenlerin örgütsel yurttaşlık davranışları ile tükenmişlikleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Mersin Üniversitesi, Mersin. Celep, C., Polat, S., Elbir, N. ve Yapıcı, E. (2004, Temmuz). Ortaöğretim okullarındaki öğretmenlerin örgütsel vatandaşlık tutumları. XIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı. İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya. Christine, N. (2011). Teacher Competences, Organizational Citizenship Behaviours and Performance of Teachers in Secondary Schools: A Case Study Of Prıvate Secondary Schools. (Unpublished doctorate thesis), San Diego State University. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2 nd. edition). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. http://books.google.com.tr/ books?id=Tl0N2lRAO9oC&printsec=frontcover&hl=tr&source=gbs_ge_summary_r &cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false Erisim tarihi: 20 Ocak 2014. Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd edition). New York: Russell Sage Publication. Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. Çelik, M. (2007). Örgüt kültürü ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı. (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi), Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum. Çetin, M., Yesilbag, Y. & Akdag, B. (2003). Öğretmenlerin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Egitim Fakültesi Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 17, 39–54. Dar, A., & Raja, N. (2014). Organizational citizenship and organizational justice in Pakistani schools. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 16 (1), 156-160. DeCoster J. (2004). Meta Analysis Notes. Department of Psychology, University of Alabama. DiPaola, M.F., Tarter, C.J., & Hoy, W.K. (2005). Measuring organizational citizenship of schools: The OCB scale. In W. Hoy & C. Miskel (Eds.), Educational Leadership and Reform, (319-341). Greenwich, CN: Information Age Publishing. DiPaola, M.F. & Neves, P. M. (2009). Measuring organizational citizenship behavior across cultures: A construct comparison between American and Portuguese secondary teachers. Journal of Educational Administration, 47, (4), 490 -507. DiPaola, M. F. & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2001). Organizational citizenship behavior in schools and its relationship to school climate. Journal of School Leadership, 11, 424-447. -72- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 58-76, 1 April, 2015 *Dönder, H. H. (2006). Öğretmenlerin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları ve bürokrasi. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Afyonkarahisar Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Afyonkarahisar. Eres, F. (2010). Organizational citizenship behaviors of teachers in vocational high schools. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 39, 111-126. Finkelstein, M. A. ve Penner, L. A. (2004). Predicting organizational citizenship behavior: Integrating the functional and role ıdentity approaches. Social Behavior and Personality, 32(4), 383-398. *Gökmen, A. (2011). İlköğretim öğretmenlerinin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları ve bu davranışların okul etkililiği üzerindeki etkisine ilişkin algıları. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Denizli. Ipek, C. (2012). Öğretmen algılarına göre ortaöğretim kurumlarında örgütsel kültür ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi [Educational Administration: Theory and Practice], 18(3), 399-434. *Karagöz, L. (2007). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin görüşlerine göre örgütsel adanma ile örgütsel yurttaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişki. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Yeditepe Üniversitesi, İstanbul. Karaman, A. ve Aylan, S. (2012). Örgütsel vatandaşlık. Kahraman Maraş Sütçü İmam Universiesi İkitsadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi, 2, 35-48. Karaman, K., Yücel, C. ve Dönder, H. (2008). Ögretmen görüslerine göre okullardaki bürokrasi ile örgütsel vatandaşlık arasındaki ilişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi [Educational Administration: Theory and Practice], 14 (53), 49–74. *Kepenek, Ö. (2008). Öğretmenlik meslek etik ilkelerinin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışına etkisi (Kocaeli ili örneği). (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sakarya. Keskin, S. (2005). Ögretmenlerde çalısma degerleri ve örgütsel vatandaslık. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Afyonkarahisar. Kış, A. (2013). Okul müdürlerinin öğretimsel liderlik davranışlarını gösterme düzeylerine ilişkin yönetici ve öğretmen görüşlerine yönelik bir meta-analiz. (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi), İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya. *Korkmaz, C. (2011). İlköğretim ve ortaöğretim okulları öğretmenlerinin örgütsel vatandaşlık algıları (Malatya İli Örneği). (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Fırat Üniversitesi, Elazığ. *Köprülü, T. S. (2011). İlköğretim okullarındaki öğretmenlerin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları ile motivasyonları arasındaki ilişki. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Maltepe Üniversitesi, İstanbul. Lee, H., Iijima, Y., & Reade, C. (2011). Employee preference for performance-related pay: predictors and consequences for organizational citizenship behaviour in a Japanese firm. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22 (10), 2086-2109. Martinez, M. (2012). What factors are associated with a school’s high level of organizational citizenship behavior? The case of a middle school staff that goes above and beyond. (Unpublished doctorate thesis), San Diego State University. -73- Effect of Seniority on Teachers’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior…C. Elma & T. Aytaç Mercan, M. (2006). Ögretmenlerde örgütsel bağlılık, örgütsel yabancılaşma ve örgütsel vatandaşlık. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Afyonkarahisar Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Afyonkarahisar. Moorman, R. H., & Blakely, G. L. (1995). Individualism-Collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16: 127–142. Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 845–855. Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: the importance of the employee's perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1543-1567. Oğuz, E. (2010). The Relationship between the leadership styles of the school administrators and the organizational citizenship behaviours of teachers. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1188-1193. Organ, D.W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta analytic review attitudinal and dispositional predictors and organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal Of Personel Psychology. 48, 775-802. Organ, D.W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behaviour: It’s construct clean-up time. Journal Of Human Performance. 10 (2), 85-92. Ölçüm-Çetin, M. (2004). Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dagıtım. Petitti, D. B. (2000). Meta-analysis, decision analysis, and cost-effectiveness analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. Robbins, S. R.& Judge, T. A. (2012). Örgütsel davranış. Çev. Editörü: İnci Erdem, Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. Özdemir, A. (2010). Ilköğretim okullarında algılanan yönetici desteğinin ve bireycilikortaklaşa davranışçılığın örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ile ilişkisi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi [Educational Administration: Theory and Practice], 16 (1), 93-112. *Özer, S. (2009). Eğitim örgütlerinde lider davranış biçimler ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişki (Nevşehir ili örneği). (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Erciyes Üniversitesi, Kayseri. *Öztürk, H. F. (2009). Okul yöneticilerinde örgütsel ahlaki iklim (örgütsel etik), örgütsel vatandaşlık ve örgütsel bağlılık ilişkisi (Şişli ilçesi örneği). (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Beykent Üniversitesi, İstanbul. *Polat, S. (2007). Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin örgütsel adalet algıları, örgütsel güven düzeyleri ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişki. (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi), Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Kocaeli. Sezgin, F. (2005). Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları: Kavramsal bir çözümleme ve okul açısından bazı çıkarımlar. Gazi Üniversitesi, Gazi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25 (1), 317-339. Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 655–663. -74- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 58-76, 1 April, 2015 Somech, A. & Bogler, R. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of teacher organizational and Professional commitment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 555-577. Sönmez, E. (2005). İlkögretim okullarında görev yapan ögretmenlerin yöneticilere duyulan güven ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul. Thalheimer, W., & Cook, S. (2002). How to calculate effect sizes from published research articles: A simplified methodology. http://work- learning.com/effect_sizes.htm Erisim tarihi: 20 Ocak 2014. *Uslu, B. (2011). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları (Manisa il örneği). (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir. Wagner, S. L. ve Rush, M. C. (2000). Altruistic organizational citizenship behavior: Context, disposition, and age. The Journal of Social Psychology, 140(3), 379-391. Van Dyne, L., Graham, J. W., & Dienesch, R. M. (1994). Organizational citizenship' behavior: construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 765–802. Vey, M. A. & Campbell, J. P. (2004). In-role or extra-rol organizational citizenship behavior: Which are we measuring? Human Performance, 17(1), 119-135. *Yancı, F. (2011). Ortaöğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin duygusal zekâ düzeyleri ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişki (Şanlıurfa İli Örneği). (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Harran Üniversitesi, Şanlıurfa. Yancı, F. & Sağlam, A. Ç. (2014). Ortaöğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin duygusal zekâları ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişki. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17, 298-313. *Yarım, M. (2009). Genel liselerde çalışan branş öğretmenlerinin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Yeditepe Üniversitesi, İstanbul. Yaylacı, A. F. (2004). İlkögretim okulları yönetici ve öğretmenlerinin örgütsel yurttaşlık davranısları. (Yayımlanmamıs doktora tezi), Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara. Yıldırım, N. (2014). Meta analiz. In M. Metin (Ed.), Kuramdan Uygulamaya Eğitimde Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (s.137-159), Ankara; Pegem Akademi. Yıldırım, Y., Uzum, H., & Yıldırım, İ. (2012). An examination of physical education teachers in terms of their organizational citizenship behaviors and organizational loyalty according to some demographic variables. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 2146-2156. Yılmaz, K. (2010). Kamu ortaöğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları ile ilgili görüşleri. Ondokuz Mayıs üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29 (1), 1-16. Yılmaz, K. (2012). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin iş doyumu düzeyleri ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişki. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 2, 2, 1-14. Yılmaz, K. & Çokluk-Bökeoglu, Ö. (2008). Organizational citizenship behaviors and organizational commitment in Turkish primary schools. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3 (5), 775–780. Yılmaz, K. & Tasdan, M. (2009). Organizational citizenship and organizational justice in Turkish primary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 47 (1), 108–126. -75- Effect of Seniority on Teachers’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior…C. Elma & T. Aytaç Yücel, C, & Kalaycı, G. S. (2009). Örgütsel güven ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19 (1), 113-132. Yücel, C., Yalçın, M., & Ay B. (2009). Öğretmenlerin öz-yeterlikleri ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı. Manas Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21, 221- 235. *Zengin, M. (2011). İlköğretim okullarında örgütsel güven ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişki. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Van. -76- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE) Vol. 5(1), pp. 77-87, 1 April, 2015 Available online at http://mije.mevlana.edu.tr/ http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.64.5.1 Reality therapy oriented intervention program for cyberbullying behaviors and testing its efficiency Taşkın Tanrıkulu* Department of Psychological Counseling and Guidance, Fatih University, İstanbul, Turkey Mustafa Koç Sakarya University School of Education, Hendek, Turkey Osman Tolga Arıcak Hasan Kalyoncu University, Department of Psychology, Gaziantep, Turkey Article history The purpose of this study is to develop an intervention program for Received: cyberbullying based on reality therapy and also to investigate the 26.07.2014 efficiency of this program for such behavior. For the study, firstly, Received in revised form: the concept of cyberbullying is analyzed and discussed within the 27.03.2015 framework of choice theory. Secondly, a psychological counseling program intended to reduce cyberbullying behaviors is developed Accepted: 27.03.2015 and a pilot scheme is launched. Remarks of experts are taken into consideration in analyzing the pilot scheme and the program’s Key words: suitability with reality therapy is established. An intervention Cyberbullying, Choice Theory, program is implemented at a high school in Istanbul in the first half Reality Therapy, Intervention of the 2012-2013 school year. In the study, designed with 2x3 split-plot method, experimental and control groups consisting of 12 people are formed and a ten-session program is implemented for the experimental group. Analyses show that cyberbullying behaviors decreased in the experimental group, while there was no change in the level of cyberbullying behaviors in the control group. Introduction Rapidly evolving technology continuously presents to us new and different communication opportunities and every new communication technology brings with it some problematic consequences. New technology has increased the use of electronic devices in schools, such as cell-phones and the Internet, and, consequently, perplexing practices involving these tools have emerged (Wright, Joy, Christopher, & Heather, 2009). One of the most prevalent problems among these is a new form of bullying, conceptualized as cyberbullying. While bullying behaviors are often encountered in schools, cyberbullying has recently emerged as a widespread problem (Baker & Kavşut, 2007). According to Arıcak, Tanrıkulu, Siyahhan and Kınay (2013), cyberbullying “includes all relational or technical harmful behaviors directed to an individual, a group or a legal personality by using information and communication technologies”. Cyberbullying, in other * Correspondence: Fatih University, Büyükçekmece, İstanbul, ttanrikulu@fatih.edu.tr Tel: +90 212 866 33 00 (2832) Fax: +90 212 866 33 37 Reality therapy oriented intervention program for cyberbullying behaviors…T. Tanrıkulu, M. Koç & O.T. Arıcak words, can be defined as “intentional and recurring behaviors which support hostile behaviors and include use of information and communication technologies, such as e-mail, cell phone, pager, sms services and websites with the purpose of doing harm to others” (Agatston, Kowalski, & Limber, 2007; Ang & Goh, 2010; Arıcak, 2009; Patchin & Hinduja, 2006; Totan, 2007; Wright et al., 2009). Cyberbullying includes many purposes, such as embarrassment, harassment, humiliation or insult, and it can be done by an individual alone as well as by a group (Anderson, 2010). Although the lack of balanced power and recurrence are said to be two criteria of cyberbullying behaviors (Nocentini et al, 2010), another approach doesn’t consider recurrence as a condition, because cyberbullying has a sustainable affect, everything on the Internet can be seen later and other people, as well as the cyberbullies, can spread this bullying easily (Levy et al., 2012). The inability to use social media opportunities and imbalance in power concerning Internet knowledge and computers lead unqualified people to fail to defend themselves in those instances. Some studies propose two new criteria for cyberbullying; one is anonymity, which means that the doer of the cyberbullying is unknown, and the other is publicity, which means that bullying can also be observed by other people (Nocentini et al, 2010). Because cyberbullying can be observed by more people than traditional bullying, it can cause more severe problems than traditional bullying (Dooley, Pyżalski & Cross, 2009). Depression, social isolation, and self-destructive behavior are some common problems (Mason, 2008; Wong-Lo, Bullock, & Gable, 2011). Some consequences, such as a difficulty in perceiving emotional problems or problems with friendships, as well as feeling unsafe in school, can occur (Sourander et al, 2010). Moreover, other studies show that victims have low self-confidence and diminished self-respect (Didden et al, 2009; Mason, 2008; Patchin & Hinduja, 2010). A study on 10-12 year-old students, by Navarro, Yubero, Larrañaga, and Martínez (2011), shows that victims of cyberbullying have social anxiety and are especially fearful of negative consideration. It’s been observed that female victims are more likely than males to exhibit such symptoms (Dooley, Gradinger, Strohmeier, Cross, & Spiel, 2010) Given all these aspects, cyberbullying has become a problem which needs to be focused upon in the schools. Although there are descriptive studies about the issue, the number of studies discussing types of intervention is inadequate. This study is, first of all, important because it is an intervention program aimed at the reducing of cyberbullying behaviors. The results of this study are expected to provide benefits both for academics and practitioners. Intervention Program Theoretical Base of the Program This program is based on choice theory. The treatment approach of choice theory in the area of psychological counseling is reality therapy. According to choice theory, the responsibility for the control of behavior belongs to person. However, when people have a problem with someone, instead of controlling and changing their own behaviors, they generally prefer to take control of the behaviors of the other person and change him or her. Consequently, this leads people to have relational problems with other people (Glasser, 1997). According to Glasser (1985), when people behave differently than what we expect, we try to persuade them to behave in the way we want. However, we cannot be successful in those cases. We don’t have any control over other people’s behaviors and desires. We can only control our own behaviors. -78- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 77-87, 1 April, 2015 Reality therapy, which has been developed based upon choice theory, is based on principles that train counselees to make more effective choices about developing satisfactory relationships with other people. The most important goal of reality therapy is to make people aware that the real responsibility for his behavior belongs to himself. Therapy process includes understanding the fact that upon having this awareness, desired change is only possible with person’s own behaviors and choices and putting a change plan which will prompt the person into practice (Glasser, 1999). Reality therapy tries to create a process in which responsible and realistic behaviors are put into practice for the counselee and a successful identity is formed in this way. Designing a plan to change unrealistic and dysfunctional behavior is the focus of therapy. Reality therapy provides explanations for what counselees actually do and establishes specific changes which need to be made (Palancı, 2004). Reality therapy points out responsibility. Responsible people are aware of what they want and what they can achieve, and they are independent and active while achieving these. In this sense, responsible people can control life better and display behaviors accordingly. Therefore, one of the most important goals of therapy is to provide people with responsibility. The therapy process includes confronting the counselee with what he does, what he feels and his thoughts, and realizing new choices in order to display efficacious behaviors. It shows the counselee how he can take control of his life and how he can live effectively. To that end, the counselee, firstly, is helped to understand what is dysfunctional in his current behavior. As the dysfunction in his behaviors is realized, the counselee will begin to be motivated to search out new proper behaviours (Palancı, 2004). Preparation Process of Intervention Program Moving from these features of choice theory and reality therapy, subsequently related literature was examined for the preparation of the program. Secondly, intervention studies for cyberbullying were investigated. At this point, it was observed that studies for this problem are generally prevention programs. Therefore, moving from a literature review (Bauman & Pero, 2010; Bayar, 2010; Burnukara, 2009; Dempsey, Sulkowski, Dempsey & Storch, 2011; Dooley et al, 2009; Erdur-Baker, 2009; Grigg, 2010; Jose, Kljakovic, Scheib, & Notter, 2011; Katzer, Fetchenhauer, & Belschak, 2009; Schneider, O’Donnell, Stueve, & Coulter, 2012; Schultze-Krumbholz & Scheithauer, 2009; Smith et al., 2008; Twyman, Saylor, Taylor, & Comeaux, 2010) which explains the relationship between traditional bullying and cyberbullying, intervention programs developed for the issue of the solutions to school bullying, peer bullying and conflict (Ayas, 2008; Dölek, 2002; Güner, 2007; Uysal, 2006) were examined. Lastly, literature related with group counseling was examined, applications and activities which could be used in the study were determined and a group program was designed taking literature related to cyberbullying into account. A pilot scheme of this program was launched in a private high school in Istanbul, during the 2011-2012 school year, and some adjustments were made to the program within the scope of the results of this pilot scheme. The final shape of the group program was examined by two experts in order to evaluate its suitability with the fundamentals of reality therapy. After these two examinations, the group counseling program was finalized. -79- Reality therapy oriented intervention program for cyberbullying behaviors…T. Tanrıkulu, M. Koç & O.T. Arıcak General Goals of the Program and Sessions The program was developed to intervene in cyberbullying behaviors displayed by high school students. In this sense, it was aimed that students displaying cyberbullying behaviors would gain awareness, recognize their own and others’ emotions, understand consequences of their behaviors, gain responsibility, and develop their social relationships positively. In accordance with this general aim, the main goals of the program were the following: It was aimed that students would Know and express their basic needs Recognize responsibilities on their feelings Comprehend their responsibilities while developing social relationships Know cyberbullying behaviors and realize their effects Find out basic needs which lead cyberbullying behaviors and make realistic choices in order to satisfy these needs Recognize the feelings of people who are exposed to cyberbullying Understand how cyberbullying behaviors effect social relations. In accordance with these goals, hypotheses below were questioned in order to test the efficacy of the program. (1) H0: There are no significant differences between pre-test, post-test and follow-up test scores of the experimental group on a Cyberbullying Scale H1: There are significant differences between pre-test, post-test and follow-up test scores of the experimental group on a Cyberbullying Scale in favor of the follow-up test and post-test (2) H0: There is no significant difference between post-test scores of the experimental group and the control group on a Cyberbullying Scale H1: There is a significant difference between post-test scores of the experimental group and the control group on a Cyberbullying Scale in favor of the experimental group (3) H0: There are no significant differences between pre-test, post-test and follow-up test scores of the control group on a Cyberbullying Scale H1: There are statistically significant differences between pre-test, post-test and follow-up test scores of the control group on a Cyberbullying Scale Method Design of the Study This study is an experimental study with 2x3 split-plot design consisting of pre-test, post-test and control group. Participants This experimental study was conducted at a public high school. In order to form study groups, 318 students in the 10th and 11th grades were administered a “Cyberbullying Scale” (Arıcak, Kınay & Tanrıkulu, 2012). The names of the 30 students who achieved the highest scores were ordered from high to low and the participants were randomly assigned as the experimental and the control group. Students in the experimental group were interviewed one -80- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 77-87, 1 April, 2015 by one beforehand, given general information about the group study and their informed consent was obtained. At this stage, all of the students, except one, accepted to participate in the group study and the group study started with 14 students. Before the second session started, two students left the group; one, because of his transfer to another school and the other, because he didn’t want to continue this group study. The study, after this stage, continued with an experimental group consisting of 12 students. The students in the control group weren’t given a pre-interview. Because the experimental group continued with 12 students, three students in the control group were removed randomly in order to have an equal number of students in the two groups. After the experimental study was completed, a post-test was given to both groups one week later, and a follow-up test was given six weeks later. The average age of the students in the experimental group (Two females, 10 males) was 15.91 (SD=0.66) and they were all 10th graders. The average age of the students in the control group (Four females, eight males) was 16.83 (SD=0.71), with seven of them being 10th graders while five of them were 11th graders. In order to test whether the difference between the experimental group (M=22.33, SD=7.95) and the control group (M=17.16, SD=5.11), in terms of displaying cyberbullying behaviors, was statistically significant or not, pre-test results were analyzed, and it was seen that the difference between pre-test results of two groups was not statistically significant [t(22)=1.89, p<.05]. Moving from this finding, it can be said that the experimental group and the control group were statistically equal to each other before the program. After the groups were formed, sessions of application commenced. Two sessions were held in the first two weeks and one session was conducted each week for the coming six weeks. In accordance with a request from the school management, sessions were held at different times and on different days in order not to have them during the same course hours. In this way, the sessions were completed between September 2012 and December 2012. On average one session lasted for 60 minutes. Measures Cyberbullying Scale (CBS) In order to determine whether the independent variable applied in this study increased cyberbullying behaviors or not, the “Cyberbullying Scale (CBS)” for adolescents, which was developed by Arıcak, Kınay and Tanrıkulu (2012), was used. The scale is a 4 point Likert type scale that consists of 24 items. The minimum obtainable score for this scale is 24 and the maximum obtainable score is 96. Statistical analyses for this scale were conducted in April 2011. Firstly, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was carried using the principal component analysis for all of the items (N=515). When the component matrix was examined, it was observed that all of the items were loaded under a single factor. This single factor accounted for 50.58 % of the variance. In the meantime, the breakpoint on the scree plot was examined and it was observed that the scale showed a single-factor structure. The factor loads under a single factor varied between .49 and .80. Hence, it was believed that the scale had a single factor structure. The Cronbach alpha coefficient for the entire scale was found to be .95 and the test-retest reliability coefficient was .70 (N=103). These results suggest that the measurement tool is both valid and reliable. Data Analysis -81- Reality therapy oriented intervention program for cyberbullying behaviors…T. Tanrıkulu, M. Koç & O.T. Arıcak Data analysis is conducted by using SPSS 15.0. Before the analysis of data, sufficiency of research data in terms of parametric techniques is evaluated; observing that normality hypothesis, which is one of the initial hypothetical criteria of independent samples, is met (Kolmogorov Smirnov p=.02), the use of parametric statistical methods has been decided to be used. Therefore, independent samples T-Test is used for comparing the pre-test means of experimental and control groups in this research. For comparing the pre-test, posttest, and delayed post-test means of experimental and control groups, One Way ANOVA analysis is used. Independent samples T-Test is used again for comparing the post-test means of experimental and control groups. In this research, statistical analysis of the findings are conducted with respect to .05 significance level. Results Findings Related to First Hypothesis Repeated measures ANOVA was performed in order to examine the difference among the experimental group’s pre-test, post-test and follow-up test scores. Table 1. Pre-test, Post-test and Follow-up test ANOVA results of Experimental Group for Cyberbullying N M SD SS Between 636.97 groups Post-Test 12 6.66 5.06 Meas. 1874.05 Follow-up 12 7.41 3.80 Error 501.27 Total 3012.30 *p=.01 **1: Pre-test, 2:Post-test, 3: Follow-up Test Pre-Test 12 22.33 7.95 df MS F 11 57.90 2 22 35 937.02 41.12* 22.78 Dif.** 2-1 3-1 As shown in Table 1, there are significant differences among the experimental group’s pretest, post-test and follow-up test results on the Cyberbullying Scale [F(2, 22)= 41.124, p<.01]. Post-test (M=6.66) and follow-up test (M=7.41) mean scores are lower than the pre-test mean score (M=22.33). On the other hand, there is no significant difference between post-test and follow-up test results. This finding shows that the cyberbullying behaviors of the students who participated in the group counseling program decreased at a statistically significant level in measurements just after application and later on, and that the level of cyberbullying behaviors after the implementation didn’t differ from the results of the follow-up studies conducted later on, and thus the effect of the program continued. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected and the H1 hypothesis is accepted. Findings Related to Second Hypothesis The results of t-test analysis for whether there is a significant difference between the post-test results of the experimental and control groups are given in Table 2. Table 2. Independent Samples t-test results of Cyberbullying Post-test Scores Post Test N M SD df t Experimental Group 12 6.66 5.06 22 -3.47* Control Group 12 15.83 7.58 -82- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 77-87, 1 April, 2015 * p=.01 As seen in Table 2, there is a significant difference between the post-test scores of the experimental group and the control group in favor of the experimental group (t(22)= -3.479, p<.01). The cyberbullying scores of the experimental group are lower than those of the control group. Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected and the H1 hypothesis is accepted. Findings Related To Third Hypothesis In order to analyze the differences among pre-test, post-test and follow-up test results of the control group, repeated measures ANOVA was performed. Table 3. Control Group’s Cyberbullying Pre-test, Post-test, and Follow-upTest ANOVA Results N M SD 12 17.16 5.11 Post-Test 12 Follow-up 12 15.83 16.16 Pre-Test Between Groups 7.58 Meas. 5.33 Error Total SS df MS 810.55 11 73.68 11.55 424.44 1246.55 2 22 35 5.77 19.29 F Dif.** .29* *p=.74 As seen in Table 3, there is no significant difference among the control group’s pre-test, posttest and follow-up test scores on the Cyberbullying Scale [F(2, 22)=.299, p˃.05]. In other words, the means of the cyberbullying scores didn’t change over the time. Therefore, the null hypothesis is accepted, and the H1 hypothesis is rejected. Discussion Data revealed that the intervention program reduced the level of cyberbullying. While there is no significant difference between the pre-test scores of the experimental and control groups, a significant difference is found between the post-test scores of the experimental and control groups. Moreover, data suggest that there are no significant differences among the pre-test, post-test and follow-up test results of the control group. Therefore, it can be concluded that the decrease in the level cyberbullying of the experimental group resulted from the implementation of the intervention program. The monitoring study supports this result as well. In the literature review, no study originating from a reality therapy based approach and which tries to prevent cyberbullying has been found. In this sense, there isn’t any direct data to be compared with the findings acquired from this study. However, according to data acquired from the literature, it is evident that people who have a high level of establishing relationships and the ability to cope with problems positively exhibit a low level of cyberbullying behaviors (Schoffstall & Cohen, 2011; Sourander et al., 2010). According to reality therapy, one of the factors causing behavioral problems is a person’s inability to develop realistic and positive relationships with his/her environment. During the group counseling program, participants were encouraged to develop the ability to produce realistic solutions for their social problems. In this sense, it can be stated that the decrease in cyberbullying level at the end of the study is consistent with the literature. -83- Reality therapy oriented intervention program for cyberbullying behaviors…T. Tanrıkulu, M. Koç & O.T. Arıcak Moreover, it is also suggested that there is a negative relationship between a sense of responsibility and cyberbullying and that people displaying cyberbullying behaviors don’t appraise the results of their behaviors and their effect on others (Çelik, Atak, & Erguzen, 2012; Dilmaç, 2009). Reality therapy also focuses on responsibility, the importance of an individual’s choices in relationships, and an individual’s unsuccessful relationships as the source of behavioral problems. In this sense, it can be stated that studies aimed at recognizing and accepting the responsibility of one’s behavior explain the decrease in the level of cyberbullying behaviors. According to some other studies, it is seen that the most frequent reasons to do cyberbullying are to have fun and to take revenge; in other words the desire to be powerful (Raskauskas & Stoltz, 2007). This case shows that the need for entertainment and being powerful, which are stated as two of basic needs of people, according to choice theory, are not satisfied realistically. Therefore, it can be asserted that in the group sessions training related to the organization of goals and needs is effective for a decrease in the level of cyberbullying. In light of this data, variables predicting cyberbullying accord with the basic features of reality therapy which explain human behavior. In this respect, it can be stated that with regards to reality therapy, a group counseling program developed to bring those variables which predict cyberbullying behaviors to the center of attention was effective in reducing cyberbullying behaviors. Limitations of the Research and Suggestions for Future Research Besides the positive results obtained at the end of the intervention program, the research includes some limitations as well. Firstly, the program is designed for small groups. In this respect, the number of participants in the target group should not exceed 15 people. Secondly, the program has been designed within the framework of choice theory. Therefore, the researcher is supposed to be competent with the basic principles of choice theory in order to carry out the program. The findings of the research positively support the idea that this ‘program’ can be effective in reducing cyberbullying behaviors. In order to increase the validity of the program, it will be useful to conduct the program with different groups by different researchers and observe whether or not there are similar results. Furthermore, with some adaptations, the program can be carried out as a guidance activity aimed at a whole class, especially in schools, thus its efficacy can be tested. The current program in this research has been designed on the basis of reality therapy. Carrying out new intervention studies based on different theoretical perspectives will be useful. By these means, not only can the efficiency of the studies be compared but also intervention options will be offered to those researchers directly confronted with this problem. Monitoring the individuals who participate in a group study, and whose cyberbullying behaviors have been observed to reduce significantly with follow up studies, and examining the effect process of the program will provide an understanding about the level of persistence. References Agatston, P.W., Kowalski, R., & Limber, S. (2007). Students’ perspectives on cyberbullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 59-60. -84- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 77-87, 1 April, 2015 Anderson, W.L. (2010). Cyber stalking (cyberbullying) - proof and punishment. Insights to a Changing World Journal, 4, 18-23. Ang, R.P. & Goh, D.H. (2010). Cyberbullying among adolescents: the role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 41(4), 387-397. Arıcak, O.T., Tanrıkulu, T., Siyahhan, S., & Kınay, H. (2013). Cyberbullying: the bad and the ugly side of information age In: Patrut M, Patrut B, eds. Social media in higher education: teaching in web 2.0. Hershey, PA.: Idea Group Inc (IGI), 318-333. Arıcak, O.T. (2009). Psychiatric symptomatology as a predictor of cyberbullying among university students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 34, 167-184. Arıcak, O.T., Kınay, H., & Tanrıkulu, T. (2012). Initial psychometric findings of cyber bullying scale. Journal of Hasan Ali Yücel Faculty of Education, 9(1), 101-114. Ayas, T. (2008). The effectiveness of preventing bullying behaviors one program based on whole school approach. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation. Ankara: Ankara University Institute of Social Science. Baker, Ö.E. & Kavşut, F. (2007). Cyberbullying: A new face of peer bullying. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 27, 31-42. Bauman, S. & Pero, H. (2010). Bullying and cyberbullying among deaf students and their hearing peers: an exploratory study. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(2), 236–253. Bayar, Y. (2010). The relations between school social climate and traditional / cyberbullying: Mediator role of generalized peer perception. Unpublished Master Thesis. Ankara: Hacettepe University Institute of Social Science. Burnukara, P. (2009). A descriptive study on traditional and cyber bullying in early and middle adolescence. Unpublished Master Thesis. Ankara: Hacettepe University Institute of Social Science. Çelik, S., Atak, H., & Erguzen, A. (2012). The effect of personality on cyberbullying among university students in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 49,129-150. Dempsey, A.G., Sulkowski, M.L., Dempsey, J., & Storch, E.A. (2011). Has cyber technology produced a new group of peer aggressors? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(5), 297-302. Didden, R., Scholte, R.H., Korzilius, H., De Moor, J.M., Vermeulen, A., O’Reilly, M., & Lancioni, G.E. (2009). Cyberbullying among students with intellectual and developmental disability in special education settings. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 12(3), 146-151. Dilmaç, B. (2009). Psychological needs as a predictor of cyber bullying: a preliminary report on college students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 9(3), 1291-1325. Dooley, J.J., Gradinger, P., Strohmeier, D., Cross, D., & Spiel, C. (2010). Cybervictimisation: the association between help-seeking behaviours and self-reported emotional symptoms in Australia and Austria. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20(2), 194-209. Dooley, J.J., Pyżalski, J., & Cross, D. (2009). Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 217(4), 182-188. Dölek, N. (2002). Researching bullying behavior of student and a model for a prevention program. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation. Istanbul: Marmara University Institute of Educational Sciences. Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2009). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of Internet-mediated communication tools. New Media & Society, 12(1), 109-125. -85- Reality therapy oriented intervention program for cyberbullying behaviors…T. Tanrıkulu, M. Koç & O.T. Arıcak Grigg, D.W. (2010). Cyber-aggression: definition and concept of cyberbullying. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20(2), 143-156. Glasser, W. (1999). Choice theory a new psychology of personal freedom. New York: Harper Perennial. Glasser, W. (1997). Choice Theory' and Student Success. Education Digest, 63(3), 16-22. Glasser, W. (1985). Discipline has never been the problem and isn’t the problem now. Theory into Practice, 24(4), 241-246. Güner, İ. (2007). The effect of group guidance which directed to improve conflict resolution skills on aggressiveness and problem solution skills of high school students. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation. Malatya: İnönü University Institute of Social Sciences. Jose, P.E., Kljakovic, M., Scheib, E., & Notter, O. (2011). The joint development of traditional bullying and victimization with cyber bullying and victimization in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(2), 301-309. Katzer, C., Fetchenhauer, D., & Belschak, F. (2009). Cyberbullying: who are the victims? Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 21(1), 25-36. Levy, N., Cortesi, S., Gasser, U., Crowley, E., Beaton, M., Casey, J., & Nolan, C. (2012). Bullying in a Networked Era: A Literature Review (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2146877). NY: Rochester. Mason, K.L. (2008). Cyberbullying: a preliminary assessment for school personnel. Psychology in the Schools, 45(4), 323-348. Navarro, R., Yubero, S., Larrañaga, E., & Martínez, V. (2011). Children’s cyberbullying victimization: associations with social anxiety and social competence in a spanish sample. Child Indicators Research, 5(2), 281-295. Nocentini, A., Calmaestra, J., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Ortega, R., & Menesini, E. (2010). Cyberbullying: labels, behaviours and definition in three european countries. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20(2), 129-142. Palancı, M. (2004). A reality therapy oriented helping model for explaining and reducing collage students' social anxiety. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation. Trabzon: Karadeniz Technical University Institute of Social Sciences. Patchin, J.W. & Hinduja, S. (2010). Cyberbullying and self-esteem. Journal of School Health, 80(12), 614-621. Patchin, J.W. & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: a preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148-169. Raskauskas, J. & Stoltz, A.D. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43, 564-575. Schneider, S.K., O’Donnell L., Stueve, A., & Coulter, R.W.S. (2012). Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: a regional census of high school students. American Journal of Public Health, 102(1), 171-177. Schoffstall, C.L. & Cohen, R. (2011). Cyber aggression: the relation between online offenders and offline social competence. Social Development, 20(3), 587-604. Schultze-Krumbholz, A. & Scheithauer, H. (2009). Social-behavioral correlates of cyberbullying in a German student sample. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 217(4), 224-226. Smith, P.K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376-385. Sourander, A., Brunstein, Klomek, A., Ikonen, M., Lindroos, J., Luntamo, T., Koskelainen, M., Ristkari, T. et al. (2010). Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying -86- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 77-87, 1 April, 2015 among adolescents: a population-based study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(7), 720-728. Totan, T. (2007). Suggestions for educators and parents on prevention of school bullying. AİBÜ Journal of Faculty of Education, 7(2), 190-202. Twyman, K., Saylor, C., Taylor, L.A., & Comeaux, C. (2010). Comparing children and adolescents engaged in cyberbullying to matched peers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(2), 195-199. Uysal, Z. (2006). The effects of conflict resolution training programme on ninth grade students conflict resolution skills. Unpublished Master Thesis. Adana: Çukurova University Institute of Social Science. Wright, V.H., Burnham, J.J., Inman, C.T., & Ogorchock, H.N. (2009). Cyberbullying: using virtual scenarios to educate and raise awareness. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26(1), 35-42. Wong-Lo, M., Bullock, L.M., & Gable, R.A. (2011). Cyberbullying: practices to face digital aggression. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 16(3), 317-325. -87- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE) Vol. 5(1), pp. 88-102, 1 April, 2015 Available online at http://mije.mevlana.edu.tr/ http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.15.01.5.1 Formative Assessment, Teacher-directed Instruction and Teacher Support in Turkey: Evidence from PISA 2012 Ibrahim Delen* College of Education, Usak University/ Usak, TURKEY Mehmet Sukru Bellibas College of Education, Adiyaman University/ Adiyaman, TURKEY When evaluating the students’ learning process, the previous science curriculum in Turkey did not value the role of inquiry and formative assessment. But the latest policy documents clearly Received in revised form: identify the change with a particular emphasis placed on student27.03.2015 centered learning and formative assessment. As an effort to understand the impact of this movement, our primary purpose with Accepted: 28.03.2015 this study is to evaluate the current stance of Turkish teachers in various critical skills, including formative assessment, teacher Key words: support and teacher-directed instruction, drawing upon PISA 2012 Science achievement, formative data. To achieve this goal, we first investigated the association assessment, teacher support, gender, SES between students’ test scores in science, and school and student related factors that influence students’ assessment of teachers in those skills. Then we compared Turkish teachers with countries that are ranked usually above the average (United States), and on the top (Korea) of international rankings. The study indicated a strong positive relationship between teacher support and student science achievement. It also indicated that teachers in all countries struggle when providing formative assessment, and Turkish teachers support students’ thinking and reasoning, check students’ understanding more than their counterparts in USA and Korea. Article history Received: 08.01.2015 Introduction Scientific inquiry plays an important role in students’ learning process, since it focuses on understanding several key concepts in all grades. National Research Council (NRC, 2012) defined these goals for students as: “ask questions of each other about the texts they read, the features of the phenomena they observe, and the conclusions they draw from their models or scientific investigations” (p. 55). As defined by NRC (2012), besides putting an emphasis on content, science education also aims to focus on creating critical thinkers in the United States. On the other hand, the development of science education followed a different path in Turkey. Tasar, Temiz and Tan (2002) noted that the previous science curriculum failed to support students’ scientific thinking. To change this trajectory, Turkish Ministry of Education made * Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Ibrahim Delen, College of Education, Usak University, Usak/TURKEY 64200. Contact: ibrahim.delen@usak.edu.tr Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 88-102, 1 April, 2015 huge changes in the last decade to align their goals with the aims stated in other countries. Despite the fact that Turkish students are placed below average in the last Trends in International Mathematics and Science Studies (TIMMS), the average scores of 8th graders increased from 2007 to 2011 (Mullis et al., 2008; Martin, Mullis, Foy, & Stanco, 2012). After investigating evidence from PISA (The Programme for International Student Assessment) data, Gumus and Atalmis (2012) reached a similar conclusion by noting a significant increase in Turkish students’ science scores from 2003 to 2009. Better scores in international tests can be linked with the changes made in the science curriculum, and Turkey continues to spend more and more to support science education. The goal of this article is to understand why Turkey still is performing below average by examining the Turkish teachers’ performance in PISA results. Before moving forward, we will examine how international documents put an emphasis on several key concepts to support science education. Later we will discuss how Turkey is aligning the science curriculum to reflect on these aspects. Importance of Inquiry and Feedback in Science Education Inquiry has been a crucial part of science education for decades (Bybee, 2010). The latest science education framework in the United States defined inquiry as making students involved in scientific practices (NRC, 2012). The National Research Council (NRC, 2012) defined eight practices: asking questions and defining problems; developing and using models; planning and carrying out investigations; analyzing and interpreting data; using mathematics and computational thinking; developing explanations and designing solutions; engaging in argument from evidence; and obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information. All of these practices focus on making students active learners in the science education by focusing on modeling and engaging in argumentation. Connected with the latest framework (NRC, 2012), previous policy documents in the US also underlined the importance of making students active learners by using inquiry (National Science Teacher Education Association, 1987; NRC, 1996; NRC, 2000). With a continuous focus on inquiry, the latest frameworks in the US also started to underline the importance of monitoring students’ progress (National Educational Technology Plan, 2004; National Educational Technology Plan, 2010; NRC, 2012). More specifically, The National Educational Technology Plan (NETP, 2004) defined importance of providing feedback as: “Ensure that every teacher knows how to use data to personalize instruction. This is marked by the ability to interpret data to understand student progress and challenges” (p. 41). The latest plan supports this idea by noting the need as: “Actionable feedback about student learning to improve achievement and instructional practices” (NETP, 2010 p. 37). Inquiry has been an important factor of science education policy documents in the US for decades. In the last decade, the policy documents also started to focus more on providing formative feedback to students. In the next section, we will examine several policy documents and studies to define the current state of science education in Turkey. Shifting Gears in Turkey Despite their importance to support students, the role of inquiry and providing feedback followed a different route in Turkish policy documents. Previously, several studies reported that Turkish policy documents (Tasar, Temiz & Tan, 2002) and textbooks (Dokme, 2005) failed to make students active participants in the classroom by supporting students’ scientific growth. In addition, the previous curriculum put the focus on teachers without paying too much attention to students’ learning process (Gomleksiz & Bulut, 2007). -89- Formative Assessment, Teacher-directed Instruction and Teacher Support…I. Delen & M. S. Bellibas Koc, Isiksal and Bulut (2007) defined the differences in the curriculum by focusing on the changing role of the teacher as: “(1) There is more than one solution and the teacher may not know all the answers. (2) Teacher as the facilitator. (3) Teacher and students make decisions” (p. 36). Connected with these ideas, the latest policy document defined the teachers’ role as being responsible for making students inquire and research in the science classrooms (Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, 2013). The latest document also continued to underline the emphasis on formative assessment by asking teachers to monitor the progress, identify learner difficulties, and create meaningful learning environments (MEB, 2013). Similar to NRC (2012) framework, Turkish Ministry of Education’s framework focus similar scientific practices without paying close attention to creating explanations. These practices highlighted as the following skills: science process skills (hypothesizing, measuring, collecting data, modeling, controlling variables, creating experiments), analytical decision making, creative thinking, innovation, communication, and team work (MEB, 2013). The changes described above were reflected in the 2007 and 2011 TIMMS reports with an increase in students’ science scores (Mullis et al., 2008; Martin et al., 2012). Connected with this growth, several scholars discussed how the new curriculum had positive impacts on teachers (Gomleksiz & Bulut, 2007) and students (Delen & Kesercioglu, 2012). When focusing on teachers’ trajectory, Gomleksiz and Bulut (2007) noted that the new curriculum highlights students’ scientific growth, and this helped teachers focus on students’ learning process. At the same time, authors also added how changes implemented varied in different parts of the country due to lack of professional development (Gomleksiz & Bulut, 2007). In a more recent study, Delen and Kesercioglu (2012) studied with a cohort of middle school students that were trained with the new and the old curriculum. In this study, 6th and 7th graders were educated with the new curriculum, and the 8th graders were educated with the previous curriculum. After collecting data from 290 students to measure scientific thinking, the authors found that 7th graders performed better than 6th and 8th graders, and there was a significant growth between 6th and 7th grade. Authors concluded that the new curriculum supported students’ scientific growth and helped 7th grade students to outperform the 8th graders who were taught with the previous curriculum (Delen & Kesercioglu, 2012). When evaluating the students’ learning process, previous science curriculum in Turkey did not value the role of inquiry and formative assessment, but the latest policy documents clearly identify the change with a particular emphasis placed on student-centered learning and formative assessment (MEB, 2013). As an effort to understand the impact of this movement, our primary purpose with this study is to evaluate the current stance of Turkish teachers in various critical skills, including formative assessment, teacher support and teacher-directed instruction. In this process, we first investigated the association between students’ test scores in science, and school and student related factors that influence students’ assessment of teachers in those skills. Then we compared Turkish teachers with countries that are ranked usually above the average (United States), and on the top (Korea) of international rankings. To achieve these goals research questions in this study are as follows: 1. How teacher support, formative assessment and teacher-directed instruction are associated with student learning outcomes in science among Turkish students, controlling for the student and school characteristics? 2. How school characteristics in Turkey explain the variation in teacher support, formative assessment and teacher-directed instruction? -90- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 88-102, 1 April, 2015 3. To what extent teachers in Turkey perform behaviors related to teacher support formative assessment and teacher-directed instruction, compared to developed countries, including USA and Korea? Method Data Source Data employed in the current study comes from Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), a program to assess 15 years old students’ skills in math, reading and science literacy internationally, organized by Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The data set includes a large amount of information from participant countries regarding students, schools and parents. The first PISA was administered in 2003 and since then it has been conducted once in every three years. The first time Turkey joined PISA was 2003. In this study, we utilized the latest PISA data that was collected in 2012. Variables Teacher Behavior. Teacher-directed instruction and formative assessment scales are categories of teacher behavior in PISA. The teacher-directed instruction scale focuses on testing following elements: “Setting clear goals, encouraging thinking and reasoning, checking student understanding, summarizing previous lessons, informing students about learning goals”. Assessment item is named as “teacher-directed”, but it focused on understanding how teachers support students in science classrooms, which aligns with supporting inquiry. Finally formative assessment identifies teachers’ role in giving feedback, informing students about expectations and providing information to become successful. Teacher Support. Teacher support emphasized on finding out how teachers provide extra help and opportunities, help students with learning, informs students to work hard. Students’ responses to each item in teacher directed instruction and formative assessment is based on a four point scales: 1 implies “every lesson”, 2 implies “most lesson”, 3 implies “some lessons”, and 4 implies “never or hardly ever.” Teacher support items also involve four point scale, in which 1 implies “strongly agree”, 2 implies “agree”, 3 implies “disagree”, and 4 implies “strongly disagree.” Student characteristics Gender. Gender is a categorical variable. We include gender in the analyses to see whether male and female students significantly differ in terms of their science achievement and responses to questions regarding teachers’ practices. Gender also plays a controlling variable role in the analyses. Table 1 below displays descriptive values of gender in Turkish PISA data set. Gender Female Male Total Table 1. Descriptive Statistics for Gender Frequency Percent Valid Percent 2370 48.9 48.9 2478 51.1 51.1 4848 100.0 100.0 Cumulative Percent 48.9 100.0 Socio-economic Status. A second variable included in the analysis as a controlling variable is socio-economic status of students (SES). In PISA data SES is designated by “index of -91- Formative Assessment, Teacher-directed Instruction and Teacher Support…I. Delen & M. S. Bellibas economic, social and cultural status (ESCS)” and it is created based on student responses to parental occupation, the highest level of parental education, and an index of home possessions related to family wealth, home educational resources and possessions related to “classical” culture in the family home. Table 2 displays descriptive statistics of SES, including frequency, minimum and maximum values in the scale, mean and standard deviation. Table 2. Descriptive Statistics for Socio-economic Status (SES) N Minimum Maximum Mean Index of Socioeconomic Status 4806 -4.61 1.94 -1.456 SD 1.106 School Characteristics Public or Private. The school type (public vs. private) is school related variable included in the analyses. The purpose here is to utilize this variable to control the variation that occurs due to differences between public and private schools. This variable does not exist in the student level data, in which case we combined school and student level data sets by matching each student with school characteristics. Table 3 displays descriptive statistics for public and private schools. Table 3. Descriptive Statistics for the School Type (Public vs. Private) Gender Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Public 166 97.6 98.8 98.8 Private 2 1.2 1.2 100.0 Total 168 98.8 100.0 Missing 2 1.2 Total 170 100.0 School Location. Table 4 demonstrates descriptive values for school location, which is employed as a controlling variable. This is a variable that is consisted of five categories, including village, small town, town, city and large city. Location Village Small Town Town City Large City Total Table 4. Descriptive Statistics for the School Location Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 8 4.7 4.7 4.7 20 11.8 11.8 16.5 51 30.0 30.0 46.5 46 27.1 27.1 73.5 45 26.5 26.5 100.0 170 100.0 100.0 Data Analyses Inferential Statistics. The first question inquiries into the relationship between student science achievement and several teacher practices, including teacher support, formative assessment and teacher-directed instruction, while controlling for student characteristics (gender and SES) and school characteristics (public vs. private and school location). We used a multiple regression analyses to answer the question. The second question examines the relationship of each scale of teacher practices and school and student characteristics. We also conducted a multiple regression analysis for each scale by regressing teacher support, -92- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 88-102, 1 April, 2015 formative assessment and teacher-directed instruction respectively on school and student characteristics. Descriptive Statistics. The purpose of the research third question is to compare Turkey with two developed countries (USA and Korea) in regards to teacher support and behaviors (formative assessment and teacher directed instruction). We calculated descriptive values (mean and standard deviations) for each country to provide an answer to the question. Findings 1. How teacher support, formative assessment and teacher-directed instruction are associated with student learning outcomes in science among Turkish students, controlling for the teacher and school characteristics? The purpose of this question is to understand whether formative assessment, teacher directed instruction and teacher support significantly predict student science scores in PISA, controlling for gender, SES, school type and school location. A multiple regression analysis is employed to estimate the significance. Table 5 displays results from the multiple regression analyses. It shows that there is significant yet negative relationship between formative assessment and student science achievement. Specifically, one point increase in the scale of formative assessment is associated with a 9.53 decrease in students science score. Teacher support is also significantly but positively related to student science achievement: one point increase in the scale of teacher support leads to a 6.13 points increase in students science scores. However, the analyses suggested that there is no meaningful relationship between teacher-directed instruction and student science score. Table 5 also shows significant results for school and student characteristics. Among all controlling variables in the regression analysis, gender, SES and school location are significantly associated with student test scores. Specifically, male students on average get 5.76 point less than what female students get in PISA science tests. SES is an important predictor of student learning: one point increase in SES is associated with 25.05 point increase in students’ test scores. School location is also a significant but negatively related predictor of test scores. Students get 7.56 point less as the school location becomes more crowded. Table 5. Variables Prediction Students’ Science Scores Dependent Variable: Plausible Value 1 in Science B SE Beta t (Constant) 518.242 14.213 36.463 Formative Assessment -9.531 1.790 -.122 -5.323 Teacher-directed Instruction 2.159 1.763 .031 1.224 Teacher Support 6.132 1.831 .074 3.348 Male -5.759 2.669 -.036 -2.158 Socio-economic Status (SES) 25.051 1.215 .349 20.612 Private 18.376 12.441 .025 1.477 School Location -7.563 1.300 -.099 -5.818 R=0.368, R2=0.135, Adjusted R2=0.134, F (7, 3150) = 70.506, p<0.05 P-value .000 .000 .221 .001 .031 .000 .140 .000 2. How school characteristics in Turkey explain the variation in teacher support, formative assessment and teacher-directed instruction? -93- Formative Assessment, Teacher-directed Instruction and Teacher Support…I. Delen & M. S. Bellibas The purpose of this question is to understand underlying factors that influence students’ report on their teachers’ skills in teacher support, formative assessment and teacher directed instruction. Table 6. Variables Predicting Student Perception of Teachers’ Formative Assessment Dependent Variable: Formative Assessment B SE Beta t P-value (Constant) -.158 .193 -.819 .413 Male .152 .036 .074 4.179 .000 Socio-economic Status .001 .017 .002 .084 .933 Private .376 .169 .040 2.228 .026 School Location -.075 .018 -.076 -4.249 .000 R=0.108, R2=0.012, Adjusted R2=0.010, F (4, 3164) = 9.301, p<0.05 Table 6 displays results from a multiple regression that focus on the relationship between several characteristics of students and schools, and student report on teachers’ formative assessment. The results show that students’ gender, school type and school location are significant predictors of formative assessment. Specifically, female students and students from public school have more positive view of their teachers in regards to formative assessment. School location is significantly but negatively related to formative assessment (R2=0.012, F (4, 3164) = 9.301, p<0.05). Table 7. Variable Predicting Student Perception of Teacher-directed Instruction Dependent Variable: Teacher-directed Instruction B SE Beta t P-value (Constant) .472 .219 2.160 .031 Male .015 .041 .007 .375 .707 Socio-economic Status -.014 .019 -.013 -.737 .461 Private .223 .191 .021 1.167 .243 School Location -.097 .020 -.087 -4.850 .000 R=0.089, R2=0.008, Adjusted R2=0.007, F (4, 3169) = 6.343, p<0.05 Table 7 displays results from a multiple regression regarding the relationship between characteristics of students and schools, and student report on teacher-directed instruction. The results indicate that gender, school type and SES are not significant predictors of teacherdirected instruction. Only school location significantly related to the teacher-directed instruction scale. One point increase in the location is associated with .10 point increase in teacher directed instruction, implying that students from schools in more crowed locations have less positive view of their teachers in performing teacher-directed instruction. Table 8. Variables Predicting Students’ Perception of Teacher Support Dependent Variable: Teacher Support B SE Beta t (Constant) .187 .182 1.029 Male -.019 .034 -.010 -.551 Socio-economic Status -.001 .016 -.002 -.094 Private .408 .160 .046 2.556 School Location -.106 .017 -.115 -6.425 2 2 R=0.119, R =0.014, Adjusted R =0.013, F (4, 3168) = 11.328, p<0.05 -94- P-value .304 .581 .925 .011 .000 Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 88-102, 1 April, 2015 Table 8 displays results from a multiple regression that focus on the association between several school and student characteristics, and student perception of teachers support. The results show that school type and school location are significant predictors of teacher support. Specifically, students from public school have more positive view of their teachers in regards to formative assessment. School location is significantly but negatively related to teacher support, meaning that schools in less crowded locations have a more positive perception of teacher support. 3. To what extent teachers in Turkey perform behaviors related to teacher support, formative assessment, and teacher-directed instruction compared to developed countries, including USA and Korea? The purpose of this question is to compare Turkey with two developed countries (USA and Korea) in terms of teacher support, teacher directed instruction, and formative assessment. Descriptive values for each item are provided in Table 9. Since students’ responses are reverse coded, lower means mean more frequent practices of related item. In Table 9, means of items regarding teacher-directed instruction scale in Turkey and USA is around 2; that is, in most class teacher directed instruction is evident. On average, such type of instruction seems to be less common in Korean schools. In Turkey and USA, the most commonly performed items are “checks for understanding” and “informs about learning goals;” whereas summarizing previous lesson is relatively less commonly practiced. In Korea, teachers inform about learning goals in most classes yet they encourage thinking and reasoning in some classes. Formative assessment seems to be problematic in all three countries. This means that teachers less commonly gave feedback to students in Turkey, USA and Korea. In Korea, however, the issue is more problematic since the mean is above 3, meaning that teachers rarely give feedback to students. The most commonly practiced formative assessment item is informing about expectations in USA and telling students how to get better in Turkey. The means of items in relation to teacher support are relatively lower comparing to means of item in other scales, meaning that teacher support is more evident in all three countries. On average, Turkish, American and Korean students agree that their teachers let them know they have to work hard, provides extra help when needed, helps student with learning, and gives opportunity to express opinions. However, just like other scales, in Korea the means of items in the teacher support scale are higher than those in Turkey and USA, meaning that on average Korean students are less likely to agree with availability of teacher support in their schools when compared with students in Turkey and USA. Table 9. Descriptive Statistics for Teacher-directed instruction, Formative Assessment and Teacher Support: Comparison of Turkey, USA and Korea Turkey USA Korea N X SD N X SD N X SD Teacher-Directed Instruction Sets Clear Goals 3173 2.04 .91 3267 1.98 .90 3355 2.31 .86 Encourages Thinking and 3177 1.84 .87 3260 2.18 .96 3356 2.92 .87 Reasoning Checks Understanding 3177 1.83 .92 3257 1.80 .86 3352 2.31 .87 Summarizes Previous 3185 2.27 1.03 3258 2.46 1.04 3355 2.50 .85 Lessons Informs about Learning 3174 1.81 .89 3257 1.70 .81 3355 1.95 .84 -95- Formative Assessment, Teacher-directed Instruction and Teacher Support…I. Delen & M. S. Bellibas Goals Formative Assessment Gives Feedback Gives Feedback on Strengths and Weaknesses Informs about Expectations Tells How to Get Better Teacher Support Lets Us Know We Have to Work Hard Provides Extra Help When Needed Helps Students with Learning Gives Opportunity to Express Opinions 3158 3.01 .99 3259 2.57 1.02 3354 3.35 .80 3166 2.73 1.01 3261 2.88 1.00 3352 3.48 .77 3170 2.24 1.01 3263 1.94 .90 3351 3.07 .88 3176 2.17 1.02 3260 2.47 1.07 3355 2.98 .94 3182 1.56 .69 3241 1.78 .69 3347 2.10 .75 3181 1.81 .79 3239 1.72 .74 3345 2.03 .71 3176 1.77 .76 3234 1.68 .70 3343 1.94 .65 3179 1.78 .82 3235 2.01 .85 3344 2.24 .77 Conclusion and Implications Turkish Ministry of Education made significant changes in the curriculum in the past decade to underline the role of inquiry and formative assessment. These changes resulted in improvements in the previous international assessments (Mullis et al., 2008; Martin et al., 2012). In conjunction with these changes, several scholars discussed how new curriculum supported teachers (Gomleksiz & Bulut, 2007) and students (Delen & Kesercioglu, 2012). In this study, by comparing Turkey with other two nations: USA (usually ranked above average) and Korea (ranked top in international tests), our purpose was to examine how Turkish teachers perform specific tasks associated with three domain of instructional practices, including formative assessment, teacher-directed instruction and teacher support. In addition, we examined whether those domains predict student learning, as well as factors that predict teachers’ practices of each domain, controlling for the role of SES, gender and school location. Students’ Science Achievement Role of SES, gender and school location. Consistent with previous body of literature, we found that SES is significantly linked with student science test scores. The impact of SES on student achievement in all subject matters has been a common wisdom in educational literature. Literature consistently indicated that higher SES is associated with higher student learning (Caldas & Bankston, 1997; Marks, Cresswell, & Ainley, 2006; Perry, & McConney, 2010; Sirin, 2005; White, 1982). In an earlier study, Sirin (2005) conducted a meta-analysis by reviewing studies from 1990-2000 with an emphasis on SES. After reviewing 74 studies that worked with more than 100.000 students, Sirin (2005) underlined that the role of SES is dependent on the variable selection and defined the link between SES and academic achievement as “a complex relationship” (p. 438). -96- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 88-102, 1 April, 2015 In this study, we found that as the school location gets crowded, students’ science scores significantly decreases, controlling for SES and gender. That is, overall schools in large location are less likely to produce higher student science scores in comparison to schools located at relatively less crowded area. Research focusing on the impact of school location, on the other hand, provided contradictory results, which mostly likely to be an issue of context (Alspaugh, 1992, Fan & Chen, 1998; Young, 1998). For instance, Young (1998) investigated student achievement differences between rural and urban school in Australia and concluded that students from rural location acquire better scores in science. Fan and Chen (1998) focused on rural and urban differences in USA and found that there is not much difference between these two groups, once the effect of SES is controlled. Additional studies examining difference in school related factors, such as educational resources and the profile of academic staff, are needed, in order to explain the issue of gap between locations in Turkey (Burtless, 1996; Goldhaber & Brewer, 2000; Greenwald, Hedges, & Laine, 1996; Hanushek, 1997; Stewart, 2008; Wayne & Youngs, 2003). In addition to the role of SES and school location, student gender is appeared as a significant predictor of ninth grade students’ science scores. Female students performed better than male students according to students’ overall science achievement. Literature has not reached an agreement regarding the role of gender yet. Previous studies, Delen and Kesercioglu (2012) for instance, found higher achievement in favor of male students after examining middle school students in Turkey. More comprehensive studies suggested that the issue of gender should be analyzed taking into account different branches of science education (Becker, 1989). For example, Lee and Burkam (1996) indicated that male students acquire better scores in physical science while female students get higher scores in life science. They further argued that the difference between genders is due to the laboratory experience. Increased in experimental and hands-on learning activities benefit females more than it does for male students. Weingburg (1995) explains such difference between genders through students’ attitude toward science. If a student possesses a negative attitude toward science class, he/she is more likely to get lower scores in science tests and vice versa. Role of teacher practices. We found students’ test score in science increase with the increment in teacher support index, controlling for SES, gender and school location. In other words, the more support Turkish students receive from their teachers, the better science scores they gain. PISA’s definition of teacher support is linked with how teachers help students in the learning process. Two decades ago, Driver, Asoko, Leach, Scott and Mortimer (1994) placed the teacher at the center of the instructional practices. Connected with this idea, previous curriculum in Turkey put the teachers at the center without putting emphasis on student learning. For instance, both authors of this study were educated in 1990s and early 2000s. Both of us only remember teachers dictating the lessons without acknowledging what we think. This is fascinating for us to find out that the teachers are making the paradigm shift happen. One of the key aspects of the curriculum change is teachers are putting students at the center of the learning process (MEB, 2013). On the other hand, we also found that teacher directed instruction has no significant contribution to Turkish students’ science achievement. Teacher-directed instruction, as defined by OECD, focuses on setting clear goals, and supporting student thinking and reasoning. Connected with these variables, supporting the reasoning and thinking is one of the most fundamental aspects of inquiry learning in US (NRC, 1996; NRC, 2000; NRC, 2012). The missing link between teachers’ support for reasoning and thinking, and student achievement raises some concerns for Turkish science education; since some scholars found a -97- Formative Assessment, Teacher-directed Instruction and Teacher Support…I. Delen & M. S. Bellibas direct link between these variables (Delen, 2014; McNeill & Krajcik, 2008). Interestingly, the current study also indicated a strong negative relationship between formative assessment and student science score. Formative assessment focuses on how teachers provide feedback to students to discuss the weaknesses and strengths. At this stage, it is important to note that previous studies also found that teachers struggle to support students’ reasoning and thinking in science classrooms (Delen, 2014; Erduran, Simon & Osborne, 2004; McNeill & Knight, 2013; McNeill & Krajcik, 2008). More specifically, several studies underlined teachers’ challenges when providing feedback to students in this process (Delen, 2014; McNeill & Knight, 2013). To overcome this challenge, some studies underlined the importance of supporting teachers with providing professional development (Delen, 2014; McNeill & Knight, 2013; Simon, Erduran, & Osborne, 2006). The lack of professional development could be one possible explanation for the missing connection for teacher-directed instruction and formative assessment. In Turkey, the inadequacy of professional development in terms of both quantity and quality is a long-term problem (Gumus, 2013). Recently, Turkish government implemented a national technology education program. After examining eleven teachers that were selected to pilot this program, Akcaoglu, Gumus, Bellibas and Boyer (2014) found inadequate training provided to teachers, and they also added that the teachers were not satisfied with the level of training provided. More than a decade ago, Guskey (2002) illustrated that professional development help teachers change their practices, which leads to change in student achievement. Thus, the lack of strong professional development would influence how teachers implement the changes envisioned by the curriculum change. Connected with gap, our analysis indicated that school type (public vs. private) and location are significant predictors of teacher support. Specifically, there is more teacher support in private schools than public school and teacher support decreases as the school location gets more crowded. The type of school factor can be explained through the well-known accountability concept (Benveniste, Carnoy, & Rothstein, 2003). Teachers in private sector may receive more pressure from schools to spend more time on the academic development of each student. Support being larger in less crowded area could be explained through the effect of school size. For instance, teacher would be acquainted more with students if they have to serve relatively smaller number of students (Cotton, 1996). Cross-National Comparison of Instructional Practices In this study, the terms “teacher-directed instruction” refers how the supports students in the inquiry process. Despite the fact that, Turkey has lower scores in national tests compared to USA and Korea, we found Turkish teachers support students’ thinking and reasoning, and checks students understanding more than their counterparts in USA and Korea. When we look at teachers’ support, Turkish teachers push students toward working hard more than their colleagues in USA and Korea. In all categories, Turkish teachers received better scores in terms of the support they provided compared to Korean teachers. In the last decade, Turkey has been pushing teachers to implement constructivism by putting emphasis on students’ learning process. This requires teachers to become facilitators of knowledge (MEB, 2013). Changing a national education system depends on significant effort, and this study is the first to empirically report Turkish teachers seem to be doing a better job compared to their colleagues in other countries. Despite these positive findings, formative assessment seems to be challenging in all countries. Otero (2006) defined formative assessment as: “Recognizing, describing, and using students’ -98- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 88-102, 1 April, 2015 prior knowledge in instruction” (p. 250). As described by Otero (2006), formative assessment requires teachers to pay continuous attention to students’ learning process. In the previous chapter we discussed studies that found teachers challenges in providing feedback when supporting scientific reasoning. Buck and Trauth-Nare (2009) took this idea further by noting: “few teachers understand the pedagogical implications of such scaffolding or their role in utilizing formative assessments” (p. 475). Connected with this idea, scholars are now searching for ways to support teachers in this process. For instance, Lee, Feldman, and Beatty (2012) used technology to support students and also described teachers’ struggles with formative assessment. Similar to the previous body of literature, we found teachers in three countries providing low quality support with an emphasis on formative assessment. Teachers in these countries primarily focus on discussing how students can get better, but did not use formative assessment to support students’ learning process. Limitations and Future Research In this study, our main goal was to understand the practices of Turkish teachers by analyzing student reports. After investigating a major data set, we report that the Turkish teachers are changing their viewpoint. On one hand, student reports clearly show that instructional practices of teachers have changed toward becoming more learner-centered. On the other hand, the perceived change seems to be limited, such that it does not focus on important aspects of contemporary teaching approaches, such as using formative assessment and fostering students’ reasoning and thinking in science classrooms. These are critical aspects underlined by the most recent reports in Turkey (MEB, 2013) and also in other countries (NRC, 2012). We therefore suggest that the Ministry of Education in Turkey develop more rigorous in-service training that address teachers needs with respect to using formative assessment and promoting students’ reasoning and thinking skills in science classrooms. A major limitation of the current study is that it depends solely on the reports of students concerning practices of teachers, instead of real practices that are based on classroom observations. In that respect, future studies should incorporate systemic observations as a method to investigate teachers’ actual classroom practices in relation to implementing student-centered ideas and formative assessment. In this way, a better understanding of the changes in instructional practices of science teachers would be possible. References Akcaoglu, M., Gumus, S., Bellibas, M. S., & Boyer, D. M. (2014). Policy, practice, and reality: exploring a nation-wide technology implementation in Turkish schools. Alspaugh, J. W. (1992). Socioeconomic measures and achievement: Urban vs. Rural. Rural Educator, 13(3), 2-7. Becker, B. J. (1989). Gender and science achievement: a reanalysis of studies from two meta‐ analyses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(2), 141-169. Benveniste, L., Carnoy, M., & Rothstein, R. (2003). All else equal: Are public and private schools different?. Psychology Press. Buck, G. A., & Trauth-Nare, A. E. (2009). Preparing Teachers to Make the Formative Assessment Process Integral to Science Teaching and Learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(5), 475–494. doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9142-y. Burtless, G. T. (1996). Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success. Brookings Institution Press. -99- Formative Assessment, Teacher-directed Instruction and Teacher Support…I. Delen & M. S. Bellibas Bybee, R. (2010). The teaching of science: 21st century perspectives. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press. Caldas, S. J., & Bankston, C. (1997). Effect of school population socioeconomic status on individual academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(5), 269277. Cotton, K. (1996). School size, school climate, and student performance. Portland OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory Delen, I., & Kesercioglu, T. (2012). How Middle School Students’ Science Process Skills Affected by Turkey’s National Curriculum Change? Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 9(4). Delen, I. (2014). Supporting students' scientific explanations: A case study investigating the synergy focusing on a teacher's practices when providing instruction and using mobile devices (Doctoral dissertation, MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY). Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Mortimer, E. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational researcher, 23(7), 5-12. Dokme, İ. (2005). Evaluation of 6th grade textbook published by the Turkish Ministry of Education in terms of science process skills, Ilköğretim-Online 4(1), 7–17. Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933. Fan, X., & Chen, M. J. (1998). Academic Achievement of Rural School Students: A MultiYear Comparison with Their Peers in Suburban and Urban Schools. U.S Department of Education. Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 22(2), 129-145. Gomleksiz, M.N. & Bulut, İ. (2007). Yeni fen ve teknoloji dersi öğretim programının uygulamadaki etkililiğinin değerlendirilmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32, 76-88. Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of educational research, 66(3), 361-396. Gumus, S. (2013). The Effects of Teacher- and School-Level Factors on Teachers’ Participation in Professional Development Activities: The Role of Principal Leadership. Journal of International Education Research, 9(4), 371-380. Gumus, S. & Atalmis E.H. (2012). Achievement gaps between different school types and regions in Turkey: have they changed over time? Mevlana International Journal of Education, 2(2), 48-64. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381-391. Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 19(2), 141-164. Koc, Y., Isiksal, M. & Bulut, S. (2007). Elementary school curriculum reform in Turkey. International Education Journal, 8(1), 30-39. Lee, H., Feldman, A., & Beatty, I. D. (2012). Factors that affect science and mathematics teachers’ initial implementation of technology-enhanced formative assessment using a classroom response system. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(5), 523539. Lee, V. E., & Burkam, D. T. (1996). Gender differences in middle grade science achievement: Subject domain, ability level, and course emphasis. Science Education, 80(6), 613650. -100- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 88-102, 1 April, 2015 Marks, G. N., Cresswell, J., & Ainley, J. (2006). Explaining socioeconomic inequalities in student achievement: The role of home and school factors. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(02), 105-128. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Science. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. McNeill, K. L., & Knight, A. M. (2013). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: the impact of professional development on K–12 teachers. Science Education, 97(6), 936-972. McNeill, K.L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 53–78. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2013). İlköğretim Kurumları Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programı. Retrieved from: http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/guncellenen-ogretim-programlari/icerik/151 Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., & Foy, P., Olson, J.F., Preuschoff, C., Erberber, E., Arora, A., & Galia, J. (2008). TIMSS 2007 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. New York: National Academies Press. National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Science Teachers Association (1987). Criteria for Excellence. An NSTA Science Compact. (Report No: ISBN-0-87355-063-3). Retrieved from: http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED280739.pdf. Otero, V. K. (2006). Moving Beyond the “Get it or Don’t” Conception of Formative Assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 247–255. doi:10.1177/0022487105285963. Perry, L., & McConney, A. (2010). Does the SES of the school matter? An examination of socioeconomic status and student achievement using PISA 2003. The Teachers College Record, 112(4), 7-8. Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28 (2-3), 235-260. Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of educational research, 75(3), 417-453. Stewart, E. B. (2008). School structural characteristics, student effort, peer associations, and parental involvement the influence of school-and individual-level factors on academic Achievement. Education and Urban Society, 40(2), 179-204. Tasar, M.F., Temiz, B. K. & Tan, M. (2002). İlköğretim Fen Öğretim Programında Hedeflenen Öğrenci Kazanımlarının Bilimsel Süreç Becerilerine Göre Sınıflandırılması.V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara. -101- Formative Assessment, Teacher-directed Instruction and Teacher Support…I. Delen & M. S. Bellibas U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Office of Educational Technology. Toward a new golden age in American education: How the internet, the law and today’s students are revolutionizing expectations. Washington, D.C. U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Office of Educational Technology. Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from: http://www.ed.gov/sites/default/files/netp2010.pdf. Wayne, A. J., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational research, 73(1), 89-122. Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta‐ analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 387-398. White, K. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 461. Young, D. J. (1998). Rural and urban differences in student achievement in science and mathematics: A multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(4), 386-418. -102- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE) Vol. 5(1), pp. 103-114, 1 April, 2015 Available online at http://mije.mevlana.edu.tr/ http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.19.5.1 Student Attitudes Towards Change From Ability Grouping To Heterogeneous Grouping At A University Class* Mustafa Bahar** Department of Measurement and Evaluation, Faculty of Education, Fatih University, Istanbul, Turkey Article history There is ample research on student grouping at primary, middle and Received: high school level but it is a controversial issue for universities 12.02.2014 educating the high and low achievers in the same classes, reflecting Received in revised form: confusion about whether scholarship and tuition fee students should 30.03.2015 be taught together. This study aims to shed light on what the student population at university thinks about heterogeneous Accepted: 30.03.2015 grouping after seeing effects of ability grouping, about which there is almost no evidence. Students in an undergraduate department Key words: who started the academic year at two different sections grouped homogenous grouping; tracking according to their prior achievement took courses in mixed ability at university; academic achievement; mixed-ability classes the following semesters. They were given a questionnaire in class three intervals asking them about their expectations and opinions of grouping before and after mixing and then after one year of study. 45 students responded to any two questionnaires and 15 responded to all three questionnaires. For the repeated measures design, Friedman test was carried out to see the change of ideas from time1 to time3 and Mann-Witney U test was used to see the differences in ideas between scholarship students and tuition-fee students. MannWhitney U test was carried out to test whether there was a difference in the GPAs of scholarship and tuition-fee students between time1 and time3. Students expressed a change in their attitudes about achievement and how the other group influenced them. GPAs of high ability students increased after they started being in educated in mixed ability class, realizing the fears of low achievers. Introduction The subject of heterogeneous/homogenous grouping has been an important issue for decades. In the first place, different terms have been used to describe the selection of students on the basis of ability, achievement or other criteria. Basically, ‘streaming’, ‘tracking’ and ‘setting’ have been used to express selection of students on the basis of achievement and frequently ‘ability grouping’ has come to be used more than ‘homogenous grouping’ * Earlier version of the study was presented at World Conference on Educational Sciences (WCES) 2012, Barcelona Spain. Address: Mustafa BAHAR, Fatih University, Faculty of Education, R-346 Hadimkoy, Buyukcekmece-Istanbul Tel.: +90-212-866-3300 ext.2825 E-mail address: mbahar@fatih.edu.tr ** Student Attitudes Towards Change From Ability Grouping To…M. Bahar (Macqueen, 2013). Welke and Bragg (1958) indicate there were tracking practices in the United States around 1930s. While some (Pfeiffer, 1966) believed ability grouping was a myth, others said it produced especially clear effects (Kulik & Kulik, 1982). Many looked into ability grouping with equality in focus (Davies, Hallam & Ireson, 2003; Jackson, 2008). Therefore, ability grouping was not advised in order to avoid inequality among students. This is especially the case when preschool and primary education is considered. At the high school level evidence and feelings are varied (Keller, 2011). Some evidence showed benefit for the low achievers and no gain for the high achievers. Meta-analytic reviews show the effects of grouping programs depend on their features. Some grouping programs have little or no effect on students; other programs have moderate effects; and still other programs have large effects (Kulik, 1992). Even if there may be a need for a fresh look at the issue of grading in K-12, the issue has been well-documented. The debate still goes on but it needs to be evidenced at university level as well. Because of the different practices in student intake in higher education around the world, almost no study focused on student grouping in higher education. Student grouping There is controversy over the issue as grouping may be based on imperfectly measured ability, informal grouping, vague interpretation of terms, survey instruments that fail to discriminate ability and tracking, allocated resources, extent of grouping and the curriculum (Betts & Shkolnik, 2000).This study aims to shed light on what the student population thinks about heterogeneous grouping after living in an academically homogenous classroom environment at university. Heterogeneous grouping Slavin’s review of 29 pieces of research on ability grouping on achievement found zero effect (Slavin, 1990) and his review of 27 researches on the effects of ability grouping on the achievement of middle school students found almost no difference between students grouped according to ability and heterogeneous grouping (Slavin, 1993). A study found that inequalities of civic competences across classrooms are relatively large in systems characterized by early selection on the basis of ability (Janmaat, 2011). Responding to growing concern over ability grouping, schools have introduced some alternative methods of delivering instruction, such as cooperative learning (which presumes heterogeneous learning groups) (Lee &Smith, 1993; Macqueen, 2013). In two studies, students in Gifted &Talented programs experienced systematic declines in three components of academic self-concept (Reading, Math, School) over time and in relation to matched comparison students in regular mixed ability classrooms, but not in four components of nonacademic self-concept (Physical, Appearance, Peer Relations, Parent Relations). In both studies, these results were consistent over gender, age, and initial ability level (Marsh, Chessor, Craven, & Roche, 1995). The achievements of average and less able students proved to be significantly higher when compared to their peers in the same ability classes, whereas highly able students performed about the same (Linchevski & Kutscher, 1998). Students most affected by inequities (ability grouping) are those achieving at the lowest levels (Macqueen, 2013). Heterogeneous grouping benefited the low achieving group most (Duru-Bellat, Mingat, 1998). Ability grouping Results revealed that the frequency with which teachers used ability groups was positively associated with mean school gain in reading, suggesting that early literacy and -104- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 103-114, 1 April, 2015 reading improvement in kindergarten may be facilitated by the use of ability groups in reading (McCoach, O'Connell, & Levitt, 2006; Robinson, 2008). There are also a lot of studies that support ability grouping especially for the high school period. On the one hand, findings by Slavin were criticized. Results of a study by Mulkey, Catsambis, Steelman & Crain (2005) reaffirm that tracking has persistent instructional benefits for all students. Yet, high-achieving students who are tracked in middle school may suffer considerable losses in self-concept that subsequently depress their achievement, and mathematics course-taking. Implications are for a broad range theory of tracking and for further empirical work on the viability of heterogeneously-grouped classes (Mulkey, Catsambis, Steelman & Crain, 2005). According to Jackson, being assigned to a school with higher-achieving peers has large positive effects on examination performance (Jackson, 2008). The results of math classes from 882 students show that growth in student achievement is significantly lower in general-track classes than in college-preparatory classes (Gamoran et al., 1997). Despite extensive research and criticism, tracking for mathematics remains a nearuniversal practice in American high schools (National Center for Education Statistics, 1994). In a meta-analysis of findings from 52 studies about ability grouping, studies in which highability students received enriched instruction in honors classes produced especially clear effects, while studies of average and below average students produced near-zero effects (Kulik & Kulik, 1982). Results of study by Cheung and Rudowicz (2003) revealed no significant detrimental effect caused by the ability-grouped class and the ability level of the ability-grouped class. Rather, students in classes that were more homogeneous according to past academic achievement tended to have significantly higher subsequent academic achievement and self-esteem. Ireson and Hallam (2009) also found high self-esteem in high ability groups. Wiliam and Bartholomew (2004) found differences in mathematics achievement between ability-grouped students and formal whole classes. A study by Shields showed that some form of homogeneous grouping benefits the most able and gifted students in terms of their academic achievement, as well as their attitudes concerning themselves as learners and regarding their school experiences (Shields, 2002). As for self-concept, pupils in the higher sets tended to have higher self concepts; pupil preferences for setting were greater in the higher year groups, as was the extent to which the top set was perceived to be the best (Hallam & Deathe, 2002). Ability grouping also increased the probability of choosing the peer as best friend (Hallinan & Sørensen, 1982). Schools with more mobility in their tracking systems, meaning less inequality, produced higher math achievement scores overall (Gamoran, 1992). Charter Public School (fewer mixed ability classes 20%) student gains in each group were larger than those of Traditional Public School (more mixed ability classes 50%) students in similar groups, and the gains of students in the high ability group were greater than those in the low ability group, contributing to increasing inequality over the school year (Berends, Donaldson, 2011). According to McEwin et al. (2003) and Phuong-Mai et al. (2008), a majority of American middle schools favor tracking, that is, students grouped based on similar levels of capacity. Results from both the questionnaire survey and interviews in the intervention study confirmed that the students were more interested in being grouped with their friends. Grouping Debates at University and Student Selection in Turkey Student grouping in classes has been a controversial issue for universities educating highest achievers and comparatively low achievers in the same class, which is reflected by confusion among universities about whether scholarship and tuition fee students should be -105- Student Attitudes Towards Change From Ability Grouping To…M. Bahar taught together. On the other hand, in the case of universities there is very little research about ability grouping of college students (Bosco, 2009). Bosco (2009) studied a group of college geology classes and concluded that students should be grouped heterogeneously. In a study with gifted youth, on the whole, the participants perceived homogeneous grouping more positively with respect to academic outcomes. They learned more in the more challenging environment provided by homogeneous classes. However, they had mixed feelings about which setting better met their social needs (Adams-Byers, Whitseel & Moon, 2004). Economics is another factor to take into account when deciding on mixed ability classes. Mixing treatment has a positive but statistically insignificant effect on average adulthood earnings. While mixing has positive effects on low ability students’ adulthood earnings, it has smaller or even negative effects on higher ability students (Kang, Park, & Lee, 2007). Due to the concerns about class content, pace and teaching methods, most teachers have a positive attitude toward ability grouping. One overall result would be what Ireson et al. found; pupils attaining higher levels make more progress in sets, whereas pupils attaining lower levels make more progress in mixed ability classes (Ireson et. al., 2002). In the Turkish context, students have to take a compulsory countrywide exam in order to enter university. Exam results are made public and students are required to apply universities online over the institution that makes the exam. No university gets its students itself; placement is made centrally as well, depending on student preferences and their scores in related areas. Because students select departments considering prior scores, location or name of the university (Orhan et. al., 2015), students with similar ability study in the same department. As for foundation universities, they also take students via the same system, no distinction is made between foundation and public universities when it comes to student preferences but foundation universities get students into the same department at three or four levels; full scholarship, %50 scholarship, %25 scholarship and tuition-fee. Departments have different codes for each type of student, but after enrolment in the university the students all study at the same department in the end. Because students with different abilities study at the same class, there is a strong need to inquire about how they perceive the situation. In one class at a foundation university students were placed into classes with regard to their achievement at the standard exam. Considering the possibilities of adverse consequences the administration decided to mix the both groups into heterogeneous groups. The study aims to shed light to the question of how the perception of undergraduate students will be influenced by this change over time. Besides, how the GPAs of the students were influenced by the change from ability to mixed ability grouping over time was sought. Method The study makes use of qualitative method and survey method by way of semi structured questionnaire and a likert scale form of the same questionnaire. Participants Freshman students at a department from a social sciences faculty who started at two different sections grouped according to their level of prior achievement (as a result of a nationwide compulsory exam) took courses for one semester inability classes and then studied in mixed ability classes for the rest of the undergraduate program. The complete group in two sections consisted of 52 students, 27 of whom were scholarship and half scholarship students and 25 of whom were tuition-fee students. 45 students out of 52 responded to the questions in -106- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 103-114, 1 April, 2015 both questionnaires. For the Friedman test, which is used with data that are not normally distributed, few in number and ordinal, the data of 15 students qualified, which means 15 responded to all three questionnaires. For the Mann-Whitney U test, a total of 45 students qualified. Process Students took courses in either one of two ability groups for one semester and then both groups were mixed up to form two heterogeneous classes. Mixing both groups did not take into account any other factors. That is, selection of students to groups was completely random. Before mixed ability classes, when they were taught in ability groups, they were asked five questions about their expectations of mixing the groups. The reason is that use of pretest scores helps to reduce error variance, thus producing more powerful tests than designs with no pretest data (Stevens, 1996). Students in both sections already knew each other in a bigger group because of a pass-fail course taken by all students. They observed each other and, they had some notion of what the other students/their fellow peers were like. In the first place, all students were given an open-ended item survey asking five questions about a) unification of classes and its effect on their psychology, b) unification of classes and their academic achievement, c) unification of classes and their course studies, d) unification of classes, extra activities and social lives, and e) how the other students influenced them, and they were expected to fill in a likert scale questionnaire about the same issues. After forming mixed ability groups they took classes for one semester and then they were given the questionnaire once again to see if there was a change in ideas. Because time may have had an influence on student ideas, the same questions were asked again at the end of the second year (for the third time) to see if there were any other differences. Reliability coefficient of the questionnaire for Cronbach’s Alpha was 0,846. As 15 students answered all the questions and filled in the likert scale questionnaires throughout three measurements without missing any data, Friedman test was conducted. When the data over more than two times is measured with ordinal scale, Anova would not be suitable. To see the difference between pairs Wilcoxon sign test was carried out as the measurements were dependent. To test the significance between the differences in ideas of scholarship and tuition-fee students, the Mann-Whitney U test was carried out because the number of students was not enough for t test. Findings Findings about questionnaires Out of 52 students in class, 45 responded to at least two questionnaires. Eleven tuitionfee students and 4 scholarship students did not answer the second form after the second semester. The Mann Whitney U test, which tested for the differences between scholarship and tuition-fee students, was carried out with 45 students. 15 students answered all three questionnaires over two years, which means Friedman test was carried out with 15 students. Pre and two post semester questionnaires were matched and compared. The findings are given in table 1. Item Item1 Table 1 Friedman Test and Wilcoxon Sign Test Results for Items 1-5 Wilcoxon Sign Test Friedman Test 2 Median Difference Time Mean Rank χ df p Z time1 1,87 2,056 2 -107- 0,358 Student Attitudes Towards Change From Ability Grouping To…M. Bahar Item2 Item3 Item4 Item5 time2 time3 time1 time2 time3 time1 time2 time3 time1 time2 time3 time1 time2 time3 1,90 2,23 1,60 1,90 2,50 1,87 1,93 2,20 1,90 1,80 2,30 1,50 2,17 2,33 8,400 2 0,015 1,806 2 0,405 3,937 2 0,140 7,778 2 0,020 2,0 2,0 3,0 time1-time3 -2,825 (0,005) 2,50 3,0 3,0 time1-time2 -2,138 (0,033) N=15 Repeated measures test of Friedman with ordinal data for five items produced differences in two of the items over time; Item2 and Item 5. In item1, there was statistically significant difference in attitudes about the academic achievement of scholarship and tuition fee students in time χ2(2) =8,400, p=0,015. There was also statistically significant difference in item5 in attitudes about the perception of the other by scholarship and tuition fee students in time χ2(2) =7,778, p=0,020. In item 2, Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed student responses over three terms did change significantly for the negative. There was a change in attitudes between time1 and time3 (Z=2,825, p=0,005). Median for time1 and and time3 were 8,5 and 11 respectively. Table 2 Mann Whitney U Test for the difference of attitude between scholarship and tuitionfee students* Mean Sum of Item Group N U Z p Rank Ranks Item4 Scholarship 18 15,28 275,00 40,00 -2,122 0,034 2. term Tuition-fee 8 9,50 76,00 Item5 Scholarship 21 16,90 355,00 124,00 -2,246 0,025 1. term Tuition-fee 19 24,47 465,00 *Only the results with significant change were reported. As for the differences between the attitudes of scholarship and tuition-fee students, out of 15 questions over three measurements, there were differences of attitudes only in the first term of the second question (How do you think your academic achievement will be influenced by mixing the classes?) and the first term of the fifth question (How will the other students influence you?). In other measurements both groups had similar ideas. Table 3 Mann Whitney U test for the difference in GPA between time1 and time3 for scholarship and tuition-fee students Mean Sum of Group n U Z p Rank Ranks Scholarship 20 23,60 472,00 98,00 -2,398 0,016 -108- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 103-114, 1 April, 2015 Tuition-fee 18 14,94 269,00 In the first place difference between time1 and time3 was found for both groups and because groups were small (n=20, n=18) for t test , Mann-Whitney U test conducted to evaluate the difference between time1 and time3 GPAs of scholarship students and tuition fee students found significant difference; Z = -2.398, p <0 .05. Scholarship students had higher GPAs than tuition fee students in time3 with an average rank of 23.60, while tuition fee students had an average rank of 14.94, U = 98.0, p = 0.016. Findings about Written Student Responses For the question that asked about the psychological effect of the unification of classes, two of the low achieving students said it would have a positive influence and four of them said it would have a negative one. One said it wouldn’t influence anything and another said it would be hard to concentrate. The two who said it would have a positive influence and one said it had no negative effect at the end of the semester. Three said unification of classes influenced negatively, one said it influenced very negatively. Two of them did not give an answer to the question. As for the high achievers, six of them said it would have a negative impact, four said it would have no effect. One said “it may be nice to meet with others”, and one said “sociable friends in the other section will motivate me.” One said it would influence him/her positively in the future. One said “not having old friends may be a problem”, and another student did not want to get used to new friends. One was concerned about the other group’s desire to have a good time. The student who said it would influence her very badly said it did influence very badly after five months. Two of the low achieving students said they would be influenced positively and at the end of the second term both said they were not influenced negatively. As for the unification of classes and academic achievement, higher achievers were more concerned about the level of education given than the other students. Four of the low achieving students had similar ideas after unification. One who said it would have positive effects said it had both good and bad sides and one who said it would have a negative influence said it had no influence (after five months). High achievers were influenced positively in terms scores and seven said there was no change. Their problems were as could be expected; simplified courses, which bring about loss of motivation in high achievers. Eight of the students expressed negative attitudes (simple, boring classes) and two had positive attitudes (due to high scores). Two of the three students who said course studies will be influenced negatively said they were negatively influenced. One said nothing had changed. (One of the two students who said they would study more really did so, whereas the other one said it had a negative influence. The one who said she missed silence in class said unification had positive and negative sides. The one who was concerned about scores; “my scores may fall”; she wanted to be in her old class. Even if the question was not about achievement (extra activities and social lives), low achieving students’ ideas are centred around classroom achievement. One answer to the question is “I feel bad when I can’t answer a question”. One student who had a positive attitude continued having the same attitude at the end of the following semester. High -109- Student Attitudes Towards Change From Ability Grouping To…M. Bahar achieving students are not concerned much about their social lives but they feel the need to express their concern about courses. One said that it would have an influence and added they had different social activities. Three of the high achieving students expressed comparatively different perspectives: One said: “They should know how to behave if there is to be unification, their being noisy disturbs others”; another said “There are social differences as you can observe” and the other said “To do activities with people I don’t like won’t change the present dullness.” While a low achiever said “they (high achievers) are not social” a high achiever saw them as being “noisy.” Discussion As the Friedman test shows, students’ attitudes towards the perception of their own academic achievement changed over time, which may be due to more heterogeneous scores in the class. Their studies were not affected, which might mean class unification did not make any change in student study behavior, and it did not make any change in their social activities out of class; their friendships were not influenced by uniting heterogeneous classes, at least as expressed by the students. This goes hand in hand with findings of Adams-Byers, Whitsel and Moon (2004). But it goes against findings of Chisaka (2002) who found ability grouping had a negative effect on the instruction and learning of learners placed in low ability classes and in social relationships of these learners and their peers in high ability classes (Chisaka, 2002). Personal encounters with instructors show most of them preferred ability grouping on account of holding intact classes. Time has shown that students’ attitudes towards the other group changed in time3. Of all five questions, scholarship and tuition-fee students had differing ideas in question-4 second term, and question-5 1st term. For the remaining 3 questions students had similar averages over three terms, which means they thought the same way towards ability grouping but had different concerns. The Mann-Whitney U test for the change of difference in GPAs between scholarship and tuition-fee students showed there was significant change in scores favoring high achievers. Results proved fears of tuition fee students were realized because GPAs of tuition fee students decreased compared to scholarship students during the 2nd year. This result is also similar to the ones depicted at secondary or high school level. Half of the high achievers expressed no influence while the other half used negative expressions about their psychologies and unification. More than half of low achievers used negative expressions about unification. Overall, students’ ideas about unification with respect to social activities changed for the positive, high achievers’ concerns centered around achievement and the classroom even in this question. It appeared that students were not as concerned about their social lives. In all questions high achievers had less concerns and their concerns were about the level of holding the class but most low achievers were scared because they could not keep up with others. These findings are similar to the findings of other research carried out at high school level. There is ample literature that says low ability groups are given simpler tasks and work at a slower pace, which was the same concern for scholarship students. Pupils in high ability groups are also allowed more independence and choice, opportunities are provided for discussion, and pupils are allowed to take responsibility for their own work (Hallam & Ireson, 2005). -110- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 103-114, 1 April, 2015 Student responses in the study were very similar to the findings of Hallam and Ireson (2005) which showed the curriculum was differentiated more in ability grouped classes by content, depth, the activities undertaken and the resources used. The less able were given more opportunities for rehearsal and repetition, more structured work, more practical work, less opportunities for discussion, less access to the curriculum, less homework with less detailed feedback, while work proceeded at a slower pace and was easier (Hallam & Ireson, 2005). Differences in pedagogy were evident in the responses of teachers who taught both mixed ability and ability grouped classes (Hallam & Ireson, 2005). Most studies agree that high-ability students benefit from working with other high-ability students (Steel, 2005). Students who answered the questionnaire in the study expressed similar ideas (at university level) saying there were simplified courses and loss of motivation. Hacker and Rowe (1993) found science teachers altered their pedagogy when they moved from sets to mixed ability classes. With mixed ability classes, teachers provided a greater variety of activities and more differentiated work, whereas they tended to use more whole class instruction with sets. Results from both the questionnaire survey and interviews in the intervention study by McEwin et al. (2003) and Phuong-Mai et al. (2008) confirmed that the students were more interested in being grouped with their friends. It was the same for the group in the present study. Some of the high achieving students complained about easier classes, about which there has been a complaint for about a century; the superior students find no challenge and never develop their capacities if assigned only the average work (Reeve, 1956 cited in Welke & Bragg, 1958). One thing to suggest may be offering modifications in the curriculum to make room for the needs of high achievers as well. Flexible ability grouping, combined with appropriate curricular revision or differentiation, may result in substantial achievement gains both for average and high ability learners (Tieso, 2003). A disadvantage to the repeated measure design is that it may not be possible for each participant to be in all conditions of the process (i.e. time constraints, location of experiment, etc.). The second disadvantage is that findings may not be generalizable to the public because of the limited number of participants. References Adams-Byers, J., Whitseel, S. S.& Moon, S. M. (2000). Gifted Students' Perceptions of the Academic and Social/Emotional Effects of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Grouping. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(1), 7-20. Berends, Mark & Donaldson, Kristi. (2011). Ability grouping, classroom instruction, and students' mathematics gains in charter and traditional public schools. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED519290 Betts, J. R. & Shkolnik, J. L. (2000). Key difficulties in identifying the effects of ability grouping on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 19(2000), 21–26 Bosco, K. R. (2009). The impact of ability grouping on college student’s performance in introductory geology labs at a Midwestern university. Unpublished dissertation. Retrieved 17 August, 2011, from http://hdl.handle.net/2097/1448 Cheung, C. K. & Rudowicz, E. (2003) Academic outcomes of ability grouping among junior high school students in Hong Kong, The Journal of Educational Research, 96(4), 241254, -111- Student Attitudes Towards Change From Ability Grouping To…M. Bahar Chisaka, B. C. (2002): Ability Grouping in Zimbabwe Secondary Schools: A Qualitative Analysis of Perceptions of Learners in Low Ability Classes, Evaluation & Research in Education, 16(1), Pp. 19-33 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500790208667004 Davies , J. Hallam, S. & Ireson, J. (2003). Ability groupings in the primary school: issues arising from practice, Research Papers in Education, 18(1), 45-60, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0267152032000048578 Duru-Bellat, M. & Mingat, A. (1998). Importance of Ability Grouping in French “Collèges” and its Impact upon Pupils’ Academic Achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 4(4), 348–368 Gamoran, A. (1992). The variable effects of high school tracking. American Sociological Review, 57(6), 812-828 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096125 Gamoran, A., Porter, A. C., Smithson, J. & White, P. A. (1997). Upgrading high school mathematics instruction: Improving learning opportunities for low-achieving lowincome youth. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(4), Abstract retrieved 20 September, 2011, from http://www.jstor.org/pss/1164447 Hacker, R.G., & Rowe, M.J. (1993). A study of the effects of an organization change from streamed to mixed ability classes upon science classroom instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 223-231. Hallam, S. & Deathe, K. (2002). Ability grouping: Year group differences in self concept and attitudes of secondary school pupils. Westminster Studies in Education, 25 (1), 7-17. Hallam, S. & Ireson, J. (2005). Secondary school teachers’ pedagogic practices when teaching mixed and structured ability classes. Research Papers in Education. 20(1), pp. 3–24. Hallinan, M.T. & Sørensen, A. B. (1982). Ability Grouping and Student Friendships. American Educational Research Journal, 22(4), Pp. 485-499 Ireson, J. & Hallam, S. (2009). Academic self-concepts in adolescence: Relations with achievement and ability grouping in schools. Learning and Instruction 19 (2009) 201213 Ireson, J., Hallam, S. Hack, S., Clark, H. & Plewis, I. (2002). Ability Grouping in English Secondary Schools: Effects on Attainment in English, Mathematics and Science, Educational Research and Evaluation, 8(3), 299-318 Jackson, C. K. (2008). Ability-grouping and academic inequality: Evidence from rule-based student assignments. Retrieved 1 November, 2011, from Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations site: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/workingpapers/79/ Janmaat, J. G. (2011). Ability grouping, segregation and civic competences among adolescents. International Sociology; 26(4). doi:10.1177/0268580910393044 Kang, C., Park, C. & Lee, M-J. (2007). Effects of ability mixing in high school on adulthood earnings: quasiexperimental evidence from South Korea. Journal of Population Economics 20, 269-297. Doi: 10.1007/s00148-006-0090-y Keller, T. T. (2011). Ability grouping: the perceptions of the administrators, teachers, and parents (Doctoral Dissertation) Retrieved from Proquest, Kulik, J. A. (1992). An Analysis of the Research on Ability Grouping: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. Research report, The University of Connecticut Kulik, C-L., C. & Kulik, J. A. (1982). Effects of Ability Grouping on Secondary School Students: A Meta-analysis of Evaluation Findings. doi: 10.3102/00028312019003415 American Educational Research Journal. http://aer.sagepub.com/content/19/3/415.full.pdf Lee, V. E. & Smith, J. B. (1993). Effects of school restructuring on the achievement and engagement of middle-grade students. Sociology of Education, 66(7), 164-187. -112- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 103-114, 1 April, 2015 Linchevski, L. & Kutscher, B. (1998). Tell me with whom you are learning and I’ll tell you how much you have learned. Mixed-ability versus same-ability grouping in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(5), 533-554. http://academic.sun.ac.za/mathed/174/TAP.pdf Macqueen, S. E. (2013) Grouping for inequity, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(3), 295-309, DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2012.676088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2012.676088 Marsh, H. W., Chessor, D., Craven, R. & Roche, L. (1995). The Effects of Gifted and Talented Programs on Academic Self-Concept: The Big Fish Strikes Again. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 285-319 doi: 10.3102/00028312032002285 http://aer.sagepub.com/content/32/2/285.full.pdf McCoach, D. B., O'Connell, A. A. & Levitt, H. (2006). Ability Grouping Across Kindergarten Using an Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 339-346 http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.339-346 McEwin, C.K., Dickinson, T.S. & Jenkins, D.M. (2003). America’s middle schools in the new century: Status and progress. Westerville, OH: National Middle school association. Mulkey, L. M., Catsambis, S., Steelman, L. C., Crain, R. L., (2005). Social Psychology of Education, 8:137–177 DOI: 10.1007/s11218-005-4014-6 http://www.springerlink.com/content/w213929p57032t71/fulltext.pdf Orhan, M., Bahar, M. & Saka, H. (2015, March). Trends in preference of economics and management departments at university placement exams of Turkey (1996-2013). Paper presented at CYICER, Kyrnia, Cyprus. Pfeiffer, I. (1966). Teaching Ability Grouped Classes. Education, 87(2), 88-93. Phuong-Mai, N. (2008). Culture and cooperation: Cooperative learning in Asian Confucian heritage cultures -The case of Vietnam. Utrecht University. Reeve, W.D. (1956). The Problem of Varying Abilities Among St, XXI, pp. 40-43. Robinson, J. P. (2008). Evidence of a differential effect of ability grouping on the reading achievement growth of language-minority Hispanics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 141–180 DOI: 10.3102/0162373708317742 Shields, C. M. (2002). A comparison study of student attitudes and perceptions in homogeneous and heterogeneous classrooms, Roeper Review, 24(3), 115-119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02783190209554146 Slavin, R. E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools A best evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), pp_ 471-499.mht http://www.jstor.org/pss/1170761 Slavin, R. (1993). Ability grouping in the middle grades: achievement effects and alternatives. The Elementary School Journal, 93(5) http://www.jstor.org/pss/1001827 Steel, M. (2005). Ability Grouping and Mathematics Education. ACE Papers. 15. pp: 116128. Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences 3rd ed., Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. Thanh, P.T.H. & Gillies, R. (2010). Group Composition of Cooperative Learning: Does Heterogeneous Grouping Work in Asian Classrooms? International Education Studies, 3(3). Tieso, C. L. (2003): Ability grouping is not just tracking anymore, Roeper Review, 26:1, 2936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554236 Welke, H.C. & Bragg, D. H. (1958). A Study in Ability Grouping. NASSP Bulletin November 1958 vol. 42 no. 241 85-91 doi: 10.1177/019263655804224108 Wiliam, D. & Bartholomew, H. (2004). It’s not which school but which set you are in that matters: The influence of ability grouping practices on student progress in math. -113- Student Attitudes Towards Change From Ability Grouping To…M. Bahar British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), Abstract retrieved 7 October, 2011, from http://www.jstor.org/pss/1502225 -114- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE) Vol. 5(1), pp. 115-129, 1 April, 2015 Available online at http://mije.mevlana.edu.tr/ http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.15.11.5.1 Mathematical Language Used in the Teaching of Three Dimensional Objects: The Prism Example Zeynep Çakmak Elementary Mathematics Education, Erzincan University, Erzincan, Turkey. Fatih Baş Elementary Mathematics Education, Erzincan University, Erzincan, Turkey. Ahmet Işık Elementary Mathematics Education, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey. Mehmet Bekdemir Elementary Mathematics Education, Erzincan University, Erzincan, Turkey. Meryem Özturan Sağırlı Elementary Mathematics Education, Erzincan University, Erzincan, Turkey. This study aimed to determine how students internalize the mathematical concepts taught in their mathematics class, what kinds of differences there are between mathematical languages Received in revised form: of the students and the teachers in defining them, and what 30.03.2015 mistakes the students make in expressing the concepts by using mathematical language. The study was conducted with two Accepted: 30.03.2015 mathematics teachers and 35 sixth-grade students in two elementary schools. The data were collected with a classroom Key words: observation form and two open-ended knowledge tests. During Mathematical language, mathematical communication, the data analysis, classroom observation forms were subjected mathematical concepts to descriptive analysis and students’ knowledge test results were subjected to content analysis. The findings showed that in spite of the differences between what teachers wanted to explain and what students internalized in their minds, these were they were in parallel to one another. However, the students had many problems in expressing their opinions mathematically. The main reasons of these problems derived from students’ just focusing a part of definition in coding, having insufficiencies in students’ definition skills-inability to use mathematical terminology, using daily life examples like definition and being aware of the exact correspondence of their definitions. Article history Received: 24.02.2015 Corresponding authors: Elementary Mathematics Education, Faculty of Education, Erzincan University, Erzincan, Turkey. email: zcakmak@erzincan.edu.tr, fbas@erzincan.edu.tr -115- Mathematical Language Used in the Teaching…Z. Çakmak, F. Baş, A. Işık, M. Bekdemir & M.Ö. Sağırlı Introduction Language is an important tool not only for expressing the meanings that already exist in mind but also for forming new concepts, relations and meanings, and for sharing this formed knowledge (Baki, 2008). The effective and accurate utilization of this tool plays an important role in establishing environment for healthy communication allowing for development of accurate conceptions of idea (Nuhrenborger and Steinbring, 2009). Mathematical language provides a mean for effective discourse that words and symbols unique meanings, and all users of this language infer the same meaning from the same expression (Bali, 2003). As such, mathematics becomes a universal language that enables its users to express scientific thoughts and concepts. The mathematical language, which is formed as a result of the blending of daily language with mathematical concepts, possess a unique technical vocabulary, which renders it different and more complex than the language used in daily life (Austin and Howson, 1979; Raiker, 2002). In an educational setting and in mathematics classrooms, if it is used effectively, what the teacher teaches and what the students learn align well (Yeşildere, 2007). Otherwise, the use of less accurate language potentially leads to misconceptions (Raiker, 2002). The peculiar relationship between mathematics and language has been defined in a way to minimize the potential misconceptions and difficulties to emerge in the process of making sense of mathematics (Adanur, Yağız and Işık, 2004). With the increased importance attached to the mathematical language in communicating disciplinary knowledge (Boulet, 2007; Cirillo, Bruna and Eisenmann, 2010; Doğan and Güner, 2012; Ferrari, 2004; Rudd, Lambert, Satterwhite and Zaier 2008), the number of studies which address the effects of the knowledge of mathematical concepts to the formation of students’ mathematical languages (Capraro and Joffrion, 2006; Çakmak and Bekdemir, 2012; Dur, 2010; Gökbulut, 2010; Korhonen, Linnanmäki and Aunio, 2011; Monroe and Orme, 2002; Morgan, 2005; Raiker, 2002; Vogel, and Huth, 2010; Woods, 2009; Yeşildere, 2007) is on the rise in the literature. Also, it is important that teachers playing an important role in the formation of students’ mathematical languages (Mercer and Sams, 2006) should effectively use the mathematical language along with having a command of pedagogy and mathematics. Therefore, investigating the mathematical language used by teachers and students in the conceptual development of mathematical concepts, their comparison and uncovering the differences between two languages are important for the development of this language. A relevant study in the literature (e.g., Moschkovich , 2007) compared the definitions of students and teachers with regards to parallelogram and trapezoid. The study showed while the teachers mostly used formal definitions by using mathematical language, the students used informal definitions by using daily life expressions in their definitions. In another study (e.g., Huang, Normandia and Greer, 2005), how teachers and students developed a conceptual understanding of knowledge and differences between these processes were researched in the study about elementary school students and teachers. The study showed that knowledge was not directly transmitted to the student from teacher and there were differences between teachers’ and students’ mathematical language. Also another study (Raiker, 2002) researched whether teachers and students gave different meaning to mathematical concepts or not. The findings of the study showed that teachers and students defined the concepts differently because of their actual positions. Considering these studies, determining the barriers in front of the mathematical language which is one of the important elements of mathematical communication is also important for teaching mathematics. -116- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 115-129, 1 April, 2015 The use of mathematical language pertaining to the topic of prism was examined in this study for the following two main reasons: i) Along with basic mathematical concepts (addition, subtraction etc.), the necessity of presenting many other concepts pertaining to the subject (lateral face, space diagonal etc.) by the teacher with an appropriate mathematical language while teaching the subject of prism, ii) Ability to measure the levels of teachers and students to establish effective communication by using examples, which are easily-found in students’ everyday environments (Gökbulut, 2010), on the subject of prism. The fact that the mathematical language and mathematical concepts are of abstract structures is of importance for analyzing the mathematical languages of secondary school students, who are at the stage of dealing with abstract operations (Senemoğlu, 2011, p. 49). At the time of the study, the sixth-grade students had already gone through a five-year communication process, which the classroom teachers had established and with which the students had been familiar. At this step, mathematics teachers are expected to explain more concepts and to use the mathematical language more effectively. Therefore, it was thought that whether a mathematics teacher and a student use the mathematical language effectively or not could best be examined at the level of sixth-grade. On the other hand, the reason the second semester of the academic year was selected is to minimize as much as possible the mistakes arising from the process of getting used to the secondary school and to the teacher’s language. Considering these issues, the purpose of the study was to determine how sixth-grade students internalize in the concepts explained using the mathematical language on the subject of learning prisms, which is one of the sub-domains of “Geometrical Objects” of the learning domain in Sixth-Grade, how teachers and students explain these concepts by using the mathematical language and which mistakes students do in this process. The main focus in the study is to determine the differences between mathematics teachers’ mathematical language use in teaching the concepts as part of the secondary school sixthgrade subject of “Let’s learn prisms” and students’ mathematical language use and to define students’ mistakes in this process. Three specific questions guided our data collection and analysis process. 1. Are what teacher say (or what he/she tries to establish) and what students construct in their minds the same? 2. Which differences are there between the mathematical language used by teachers and students? 3. What kind of mistakes do students make in mathematical language use while expressing mathematical concepts? Method 1. Model A case study method from qualitative research methods which allows for the thorough analysis of one or more events, media, programs, social groups or other interconnected systems (McMillan, 2000) was used in this study. 2. Participants -117- Mathematical Language Used in the Teaching…Z. Çakmak, F. Baş, A. Işık, M. Bekdemir & M.Ö. Sağırlı The research was carried out at the second semester of the 2011-2012 Academic Year with two mathematics teachers and 35 sixth-grade students (11 years) in two public secondary schools located in a medium-sized Eastern Mediterranean city in Turkey. 19 of these students were educated in the state schools in the city centre and 16 of them were educated in the village schools. The first teacher working in the city centre was coded as T1and had a 10- year experience in teaching. The second teacher working in the village was coded as T2 and had a 5-year experience in teaching. A purposeful sampling method of typical case sampling was used for selection of participants. The participant teachers were coded as T1 and T2. The participant students correspondent with teachers’ codes (e.g. students of T1 were coded as T1S1,…,T1S19; and students of T2 were coded as T2S1,…,T2S16). 3. Data Collection Instruments and Collection of Data Data were collected in two stages. First, the mathematical concepts and their definitions on the subject of prism which were taught during two course hours were collected using the observation form. The aim here was to determine the concepts that the teacher used in the communication process and how these concepts were expressed. At the second stage, data on students’ thinking were collected using two open-ended knowledge tests –KT1 and KT2-, which were on the concepts taught as part of the subject of prism for sixth-grade students. These tests were prepared after taking opinions from three educators who had command of the subject of qualitative research. The question asked in KT1 is the following: Suppose that your best friend missed the class the day the subject of prism was taught. This is why he/she does not know anything about what the teacher lectured in the class. Convey the lecture to your friend. On the other hand, the question asked in KT2 is the following: Define the concepts of lateral face, edge, space diagonal, prism, vertice, base and height; and show the elements of a prism by drawing one in the boxes. Students were firstly given KT1, and after collecting KT1 test forms back, KT2 test forms were handed out, in order to prevent KT2 from affecting students’ responses to KT1, as KT2 involved elements of concepts given in KT1. 4. Analysis of Data Analysis of data was performed in two stages: analysis of the observation form and KT1, and analysis of KT2. At the first stage, analysis of the data pertaining to the first sub-problem was performed using the observation form and KT1. Data extracted from the observation form were subjected to descriptive analysis in which the conceptual structure is known beforehand (Yıldırım and Şimşek, 2008) and then, through the observation data obtained, the concepts mentioned by the teacher in the class were determined. Besides, the data were analyzed by considering teachers’ emphasis on certain characteristics of concepts and their dialogues with students. Two independent raters coded the observation data. Points that were thought to have influence on concepts were determined through the experts’ consensus, and the analyses of teachers’ lectures were summarized. In order to identify the concepts and relations that could explain the data collected through KT1, the data were subjected to content analysis. Students’ responses to KT1 were analyzed by two experts, and the similarities and differences between the analyses of teachers’ classes and the responses given by students to KT1 were noted. At the second stage, KT2 results were analysed so to respond the second and third subproblems. The coding categories reached -118- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 115-129, 1 April, 2015 1) Accurate drawing of prism and correct use of mathematical language; 2) Accurate drawing of prism but inaccurate use of mathematical language; 3) Accurate drawing of prism but incorrect use of mathematical language; 4) Accurate drawing of prism but no definition; 5) Completely incorrect answers or blank ones. Frequencies and percentages of student responses were determined. At the same time, at this stage, students’ mistakes were categorized. To increase the reliability of coding; parts that had been removed, categories that had been defined and expressions that had been put under them were re-analyzed by a group, which was consisted of the two experts and another expert from outside the scope of the study, and then common responses were identified. These three experts discussed the responses and added new categories if needed. Lastly supportive qualitative data including quotes were used to explain the sources of errors. Findings 1. Findings related to the sub-problem “Are what teacher say (or what he/she tries to establish) and what students construct in their minds the same”: In order to determine what the teacher says (or what he/she tries to establish); the two participants teachers’ lectures are summarized (below) including the durations they dedicated to each concept. The reason a special emphasis was put on durations is the idea that time is an important factor influencing students’ comprehension of concepts. Class analysis of T1: The teacher started the class by sharing an example from daily life: “Folks! The other day I received a box of books I had ordered earlier. They put the books in the box like this and sealed the box like this... So, what is this box?” By asking this question, he let the students figure out that the box is a prism. Then, he talked about examples of prisms encountered in daily life. This opening discussion lasted about 11 minutes. He then introduced the elements of a prism on a teaching object and provided definitions. This lasted approximately 6 minutes. He then offered examples of objects that are not prisms, formally defined prisms, and finally asked students to draw a prism and to share its definition (approximately 10 minutes). While discussing examples of prisms and their elements, he concluded the lesson by asking and asked students to draw expanded rectangles and triangular prisms (6 minutes). He started the second class by discussing four space diagonals about 10 minutes, and then he provided a formal definition by asking students to visualize the two remotest corners of the room. He continued the class in the Q&A style by describing oblique and right prisms (5 minutes). While describing oblique and right prisms, he both used teaching object and drew examples on the board. In the remaining time, he presented examples from the computer and from the course book. Class analysis of T2: The teacher spent the majority of the first session by trying to learn what students know in order to determine students’ prior knowledge on the subject. In this process, he used triangular prism and rectangular prism together, and introduced many elements of prisms. He put a special emphasis, for around 7 minutes, on the concept of dimension. He stated, “the most important concept in prisms is the concept of height, which is the third dimension”. T2 used a matchbox as an example, which was a small object considering the size of the classroom. Using the matchbox; he introduced the concepts of height, vertix and edge along -119- Mathematical Language Used in the Teaching…Z. Çakmak, F. Baş, A. Işık, M. Bekdemir & M.Ö. Sağırlı with the number of faces for around 3 minutes. Then, he talked for 4 minutes about the concepts of oblique prism and right prism. While describing oblique and right prisms, he did not use teaching object and only drew examples on the board. He devoted 8 minutes to the concept of height, which he thinks the most important concept in prisms. The first session ended following a dialogue between a student and the teacher. He started the second session by discussing the subject of prisms (2 minutes). Using the Q&A method, he asked T2 students to calculate the perimeter of the lateral faces of the rectangular prism that he had shown in the previous session, and then he talked about the perimeters these faces (around 6 minutes). While defining lateral face, he said that “the lateral face of a prism is always a rectangle” and demonstrated it on the material (for around 5 minutes). He dedicated 2 minutes to the concept of edge by also showing it on the example he had. After talking for 7 minutes about the concepts of diagonal and space diagonal, he summarized the subject of prisms for around 3 minutes and then asked students to write down these concepts on their notebooks. In order to determine what students construct in their minds, as stated in the first sub-problem, the responses given by the students of both teachers to the KT1 were analyzed. It was observed that while some students used one type of prism, others used two and some others used none. Graph I illustrates the types of prisms produced by the students. Graph I. Types of prisms used by students coded as T1S and T2S while depicting prisms. As presented in Graph I, while only three students identified triangular prism, which is less frequently experienced in daily life and textbooks in T1’s class, this number was higher in T2’s class. This result might stem from the fact that T1 emphasized rectangular prism in his lecture and referenced other types of prisms less frequently. On the other hand, T2 used examples of rectangular and triangular prisms together. Additionally, although both teachers had introduced other types of prisms such as hexagonal and pentagonal prisms in their lessons, none of the students provided such examples. In Graph II and Graph III. Illustrate the approaches that the students used in response to the question in KT1 (Suppose that your best friend missed the class the day the subject of prism was taught. This is why he/she does not know anything about what the teacher lectured in the class. Convey the lecture to your friend.) -120- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 115-129, 1 April, 2015 Graph II. Depiction codes and frequencies of students coded T1S for the subject of prisms Graph III. Depiction codes and frequencies of students coded T2S for the subject of prisms The depiction codes and frequencies of T1S are given in Graph II. They followed the following way while depicting prisms: Demonstrating by drawing the elements (15 correct, 1 partially correct, 1 incorrect), by specifying the elements (6 correct, 2 partially correct, 1 incorrect), by drawing the expansion (5 correct, 2 incorrect), by defining the elements (1 correct, 6 partially correct), by drawing a right prism (3 correct, 1 incorrect) and by drawing an oblique prism (4 correct, 2 incorrect). The depiction codes and frequencies of T2S are given in Graph II. They followed the following path while depicting the subject of prisms: Demonstrating by drawing the elements (9 correct, 2 partially correct), by specifying the elements (4 correct, 2 partially correct, 1 incorrect), by drawing the expansion (4 correct) and by defining the elements (2 correct, 2 partially correct). It is notable that they did not attempt to draw a right prism or an oblique prism. As shown that students mostly preferred to depict prisms by either drawing or specifying the elements of a prism. It was also observed that the instances of defining these elements by using a mathematical language were lower in the class of T2. This might be due to the fact that T1 dedicated more time and energy to defining the elements of prisms in his classes and asked students to write down those definitions. On the other hand, T2 asked different questions and dedicated less time. Note also that none of the students in T2 class used oblique or right prisms in their depictions. On the other hand, T1’s students used examples of these types of prisms. This -121- Mathematical Language Used in the Teaching…Z. Çakmak, F. Baş, A. Işık, M. Bekdemir & M.Ö. Sağırlı finding required a revisiting of class observations, which indicated that both teachers dedicated approximately same amount of time to introducing these types of prisms. However, T1 both used teaching objects and drew examples on the board. On the other hand, T2 only drew examples on the board. Differences in students’ responses might be attributed to these teacher practices. 2. Findings related to the sub-problem “Which differences are there between the mathematical language used by teachers and students?”: With the purpose of finding answers to the second sub-problem; class observations and students’ responses to KT2 were analyzed. With the purpose of determining whether students managed to define the concept of prism, the visual illustrations and verbal definitions provided by students were coded in line with the data obtained from KT2 (Define the concepts of prism, and show by drawing a prism in the boxes) and these codes and frequencies are presented together in Table 1. Table 1. Categories and frequencies concerning students’ definitions of the concept of prism Prism T1S Example f T2S Example f Accurate drawing of prism and correct use of mathematical language 0 - 1 “Prisms are three dimensional figures with a height and equal upper and lower bases” Accurate drawing of prism but inaccurate use of mathematical language 10 “An empty box” 2 “Three dimensional objects” Accurate drawing of prism but incorrect use of mathematical language 4 “Prism forms of a square, triangle and rectangle” 1 “A prism has three faces” Accurate drawing of prism but no definition 3 - 11 - Totally incorrect or empty answer 2 - 1 - Total 19 16 17 of T1S students failed to define prism using a correct mathematical language although they presented accurate drawings. While ten of these students provided a definition using an inaccurate mathematical language, three of them did not give any definition at all. 15 of T2S students drew prisms accurately, only one of them provided a nearly correct definition, two used the mathematical language inaccurately and eleven did not give any definition at all. Similar results were observed among students’ responses to KT2 (Define the concepts of lateral face, edge, space diagonal, vertice, base and height; and show the elements of a prism by drawing one in the boxes), and they are shown in Table 2. Table 2. Categories and frequencies concerning students’ definitions of elements of prism Frequencies of T1S (f) -122- Frequencies of T2S (f) Accurate drawing but inaccurate use of mathematical language 6 Accurate drawing but incorrect use of mathematical language 2 Accurate drawing but no definition 0 Totally incorrect or empty answer 2 16 3 2 4 2 2 1 (14%) 12 7 13 5 53 10 4 2 3 16 0 2 3 1 2 1 2 1 0 4 6 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 6 4 1 23 8 (20%) 4 (4%) 9 7 4 8 9 3 (5%) 2 11 (12%) (14%) 0 14 (15%) (47%) 5 Total and Percentage 0 Space diagonal 6 Vertice Space diagonal 0 Height Vertice 1 Lateral Face Height 0 Edge Lateral Face 9 Base Edge Accurate drawing and correct use of mathematical language Themes Total and Percentage Base Elements of Prism Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 115-129, 1 April, 2015 40 (41%) 2 4 7 3 4 7 27 (28%) As presented in Table 2, the mathematical language was used correctly in 14% of the responses regarding the elements of prisms in T1’s classroom, whereas it was used inaccurately in 47% of them and incorrectly in 14% of those responses. On the other hand, 20% of the responses did not include any definition at all. In the classroom of T2; while defining the elements of prisms, 15% of students used the mathematical language correctly, 12% used it inaccurately, 4% used it incorrectly, 41% provided accurate drawings but no definition, and 28% provided no definition at all. The low percentages in terms of correctly using the mathematical language might have stemmed from students’ previous learning. However, obtaining such low percentages after the participants teachers had taught the subject is an unexpected result for this study. Besides, it is notable that there was no student who provided a correct definition but no drawing. This shows that students who are capable of correctly defining the concept are also capable of drawing it. On the other hand, it could be stated based on the findings that every student who can draw is not necessarily capable of providing a definition. 3. Findings related to the sub-problem “What kind of mistakes do students make in mathematical language use while expressing mathematical concepts?: As was also presented in the first sub-problem; parallelisms between the ways teachers taught the course and the responses given by students to KT1 are indicators of the impacts of the communication during classes upon students. However, it cannot be stated that there are parallelisms between the responses that students gave to KT2 and the definitions provided by teachers in class. The incorrect responses given by students to KT2 were group under the following headings: ● ● ● Students coded only a part of the definition Insufficiencies in students’ definition skills Inability to use a mathematical terminology -123- Mathematical Language Used in the Teaching…Z. Çakmak, F. Baş, A. Işık, M. Bekdemir & M.Ö. Sağırlı ● ● ● ➢ Use of daily life examples as definitions Students’ unawareness about the exact correspondence of their definitions Use of a particular case introduced in the class as the definition Students coded only a part of the definition: While listening to teachers; some students perceived, selected or coded in mind only a portion of the definition provided by the teacher. For example; T1S12, T1S13 and T2S10 gave the following definitions. T1S12: “An object whose all sides are closed.” (Prism) T1S13: “Surface of a prism” (Lateral face) T2S0: “Three-dimensional object” (Prism) T1S12 heard the following definition in the class: “A prism is a closed object that is obtained by bringing together the endpoints of equilaterals of two parallel polygons. However, s/he coded only the part about “closed object”. This may complicate for him/her to differentiate between a prism and other closed objects. ➢ Insufficiencies in students’ definition skills: The finding that some students did not provide any definitions although they were asked to indicates that they lack this skill. The following are relevant examples: T1S5: “Space diagonal: Here is the prism’s line diagonal.” T1S5: “Base: Base is the upper and lower sides of prisms. Base is here.” T2S3: “Base: There are 2 bases.” T2S5: “Vertice: It consists of six vertices.” These examples are not proper definitions. It can be stated that this situation is a consequence of students’ lack of command of the mathematical language. ➢ Inability to use a mathematical terminology: In order for students to use the mathematical language, they firstly need to have a command of the mathematical terminology and then they should internalize meaningful sentences using these terms. The following are examples in this category: T1S14: “Space diagonal: The line between its remotest vertices.” T1S7: “Edge: The line that constitutes a prism.” T1S8: “Vertice: The thing that connects lines.” T1S9: “Edge: A plain side of a thing is called edge.” T1S18: “Lateral face: Side of a figure.” -124- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 115-129, 1 April, 2015 Although students had learned the concept of “line segment”; they used concepts like “line”, “thing” and “side”. Use of such words negatively influences the development of their mathematical language skills. ➢ Use of daily life examples as definitions: When teachers proceed in the class to the mathematical definition after giving examples from daily life, some students perceive that concept only through the daily life example. For example, T1S12 and T1S13 gave the following responses in KT2: T1S12: “Vertice: Pointy place of a prism” T1S13: “Prism: An empty box” Students of T1 defined prism as “an empty box”, probably because T1 used the daily life example of box in the beginning of the class. Moreover, T1 taught the concept of vertice by telling a story of someone who hurt himself after running against the corner of a desk. After asking the reason, students gave the response “because it is incisive”. This is why, students explained vertice using a daily language. ➢ Students’ unawareness about the exact correspondence of their definitions: Definitions made by most students actually involved different meanings, because they used inaccurate mathematical expressions or they failed to fully express their opinions. Moreover, students provide their definitions without being aware of this situation. The following are some examples. T1S10: “Edge: The line that connects vertices is called edge.” T1S16: “Prism: A figure which is given a name according to its bases and which has volume.” T1S18: “Space diagonal: It divides the object into two.” T2S11: “Height: Length of the steep line” T2S10: “Height: Edge that connects lower and upper bases” For example, while stating that “the line that connects vertices is called edge”, students are not aware of the fact that a face diagonal or a space diagonal could also be obtained by connecting the vertices. Or, the definition "space diagonal divides the object into two" indicates that the student is not aware of the fact that the object can also be divided into two vertically or horizontally. It is necessary to raise awareness of students about these incorrect definitions. ➢ Use of a case introduced in the class as the definition: Teachers give examples in classes in order to enable students to understand the concept better by generalizing a particular case and using it in the concept’s definition. The following are relevant examples: T2S6: “Space diagonal emerges when it comes from the upper left corner to the lower right corner.” T2S5: “Lateral face generally has a rectangular shape” Probably because it is easier for students to recall the example given by the teacher, students -125- Mathematical Language Used in the Teaching…Z. Çakmak, F. Baş, A. Işık, M. Bekdemir & M.Ö. Sağırlı use such examples rather than developing their own definitions. This is likely to pave the way for an incorrect internalization of the concept in mind. Conclusion, Discussion and Suggestions In this study, we traced the connection between mathematical language used by teachers and their students when describing and defining prisms. It was observed that the definitions that students made, the examples that students selected and the paths that students followed somewhat paralleled to their teachers’ own classroom practices. Students tended to use the examples of prisms that their teachers had illustrated while introducing prisms in their lesson. Moreover, in light of course observation analyses, it was observed that the participant teacher coded T1 spent more time in defining concepts than T2, and thus, students of T1 provided more conceptual definitions in KT1 and KT2 than students of T2. Therefore, it could be stated that the mathematical communication environment, which consists of numerous elements such as materials used by teachers during classes, order they follow while teaching concepts or examples they prefer, has a significant impact upon learners. Along with these similarities, some difference also emerged. For example, students did not use the different types of prisms that teachers had shown during classes. Similar results were reported in Tsamir, Tirosh and Levenson (2008). The authors found that students use certain frequently-used geometrical objects while expressing their mathematical thoughts. Gökbulut (2010) also reported that pre-service teachers failed to diversify prism examples while teaching the topic. Although T2 explained oblique prism and right prism, none of his students used these concepts. Differences were observed between the mathematical languages used by the teachers and the students. Although the teachers used correct mathematical language in their lecture, only 14% of T1S students and 15% of T2S students adopted such approach when answering questions. This shows that students of both groups struggled to express their idea using formal mathematical language. This struggle was also reported by Woods (2009), Capraro and Joffrion (2006) and Dur (2010) among elementary school students and by Korhonen, Linnanmäki and Aunio (2011) among high school students. Çakmak and Bekdemir (2012) also reported for university students. Those students who geometrically provided a correct definition also managed to illustrate the relevant concept. Woods (2009) noted a similar finding by outlining that some students experience problems in expressing their mathematical knowledge despite their success in the field of mathematics. When the responses under the category “Students coded only a part of the definition” are examined, it was observed that students only noticed and focused on a part of the definition. For example, the concept of prism was named by some students as “a closed object” and “a three-dimensional object”. A similar situation has also been reported by Gökbulut (2010). It is thought that this situation might have stemmed from selective perception, which is defined as a communication obstacle in which only certain parts of a message are received (Yazıcı and Gündüz, 2010). Some students preferred defining concepts by drawing arrows on their drawings rather than verbal expressions. Since these illustrations were mathematically correct, it is interpreted that -126- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 115-129, 1 April, 2015 they did so not because they lacked knowledge on concepts but because they were unable to express their opinions verbally, and thus these responses were addressed under the category of “Insufficiencies in students’ definition skills”. Similarly, Gökbulut (2010) reports that preservice teachers do not possess necessary skills to provide definitions. Students use terms such as “a thing” instead of a mathematical language, and this was interpreted as students’ inability to use a mathematical terminology. A similar finding was obtained by Yeşildere (2007), who conducted a study with pre-service teachers on geometrical concepts. It was observed that daily life examples were used as definitions (e.g. “prism: empty box”). This finding is in parallel with the finding obtained in study carried out by Baş, Çakmak, Bekdemir and Işık (2012). In responses addressed under the category “Students’ unawareness about the exact correspondence of their definitions”; students defined concepts through generalizations (e.g. “edge: the line that connects vertices”) that could also be valid for other concepts. This finding is in parallel with the finding of Gökbulut (2010) that students do not use the critical features of the concept while defining the concept of prism. Some students used a particular case introduced by their teachers in the class while defining subjects (e.g. “space diagonal: it emerges when it comes from the upper left to the lower right corner”), and such responses were addressed under the category of “Use of a particular case introduced in the class as the definition”. Departing from these findings, it is suggested that teachers’ awareness about the problems identified in this study should be raised, and teachers should pay attention to their students’ correct use of the mathematical language. On the other hand, future studies should address this issue from different perspectives in order to contribute to the elimination of these problems for students. In this context, it can be said that teachers’ language is influential on the students’ language use but this effect is not in a direct way. Therefore, teachers should consider aforementioned difficulties of students while they are using mathematical language in the classrooms. References Adanur, Y., Yağız, O., & Işık, A. (2004). Mathematics and language. Journal of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education Series D: Research in Mathematical Education, 8(1), 31–37. Austin, J. L., & Howson, A. G. (1979). Language and mathematical education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 10(2), 161-197. Baki, A. (2008). Kuramdan uygulamaya matematik eğitimi [From theory to practice math education]. Ankara: Harf Eğitim. Bali, Ç. G. (2003). Opınıons of prospectıve mathematıcs teachers about language ın mathematıcs teachıng. Journal of Hacettepe Education Faculty, 25, 19-25. Baş F., Çakmak Z., Bekdemir M., & Işık A. (2012, September). Mathematical communication and mathematical communication barriers between instructor and student in teaching basic topological concepts. Paper presented at the meeting of the 11. Matematik Sempozyumu, in Samsun, Turkey. -127- Mathematical Language Used in the Teaching…Z. Çakmak, F. Baş, A. Işık, M. Bekdemir & M.Ö. Sağırlı Boulet, G. (2007). How does language impact the learning of mathematics? Let me count the way. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 1-12. Capraro, M. M., & Joffrion, H. (2006). Algebraic equations: can middle-school students meaningfully translate from words to mathematical symbols? Reading Psychology, 27(2), 147-164. Cirillo, M., Bruna, K. R., & Eisenmann, B. H. (2010). Acquisition of mathematical language: suggestions and activities for English language learners. Multicultural Perspectives, 12(1), 34-41. Çakmak, Z., & Bekdemir, M. (2012, May). Mathematıcal language skılls of pre-servıce elementary mathematıcs teachers on the ıssue of "patterns". Paper presented at the meeting of the IV. Uluslararası Türkiye Eğitim Araştırmaları Kongresi, in İstanbul, Turkey. Doğan, M., & Güner, P. (2012, June). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının matematik dilini anlama ve kullanma becerilerinin incelenmesi [The investigation of pre-service elemantary mathematics teachers’ abilities of understanding and using mathematical language]. Paper presented at the meeting of the X. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, in Niğde, Turkey. Dur, Z. (2010). Exploring students’ ability of using mathematical language through writing stories in communication with respect to different variables. Unpublished master’s dissertation, Hacettepe University, Ankara. Ferrari, P. L. (2004). Matematical language and advanced mathematics learning. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 383–390. Gökbulut, Y. (2010). Prospectıve prımary teachers’ pedagogıcal content knowledge about geometrıc shapes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Gazi University, Ankara. Huang, J., Normandia , B., and Greer , S. (2005). Communicating mathematically: comparison of knowledge structures in teacher and student discourse in a secondary math classroom. Communication Education, 54(1), 34–51. Korhonen, J., Linnanmäki, K., & Aunio, P. (2011). Language and mathematical performance: a comparison of lower secondary school students with different level of mathematical skills. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 1-12. McMillan, J. H. (2000). Educational research fundamentals for the consumer. USA: Longman. Mercer, N. & Sams, C., (2006). Teaching children how touse language to solve maths problems. Language and Education, 20(6): 507-528. Monroe, E. E. & Orme, M. P. (2002). Developing mathematical vocabulary. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 46(3), 139-142. Morgan, C. (2005). Words, definitions and concepts in mathematics, teaching and learning, Language and Education, 19(2), 103–117. Moschkovich, J. (2007). Examining mathematical discourse practices. For the learning of mathematics, 27(1), 24-30. Nührenbörger, M., & Steinbring, H. (2009). Forms of mathematical interaction in different social settings: examples from students’, teachers’ and teacher–students’ communication about mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 111-132. Raiker, A. (2002). Spoken language and mathematics. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(1), 45-60. Rudd, L. C., Lambert, M. C., Satterwhite, M. & Zaier, A. (2008). Mathematical language in early childhood settings: What really counts? Early Childhood Education, 36, 75-80. -128- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 115-129, 1 April, 2015 Senemoğlu, N. (2011). Kuramdan uygulamaya gelişim, öğrenme ve öğretim [From theory to application development, learning and teaching]. Ankara: Pegem A. Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D. & Levenson, E. (2008). Intuitive nonexamples: the case of triangles. Educ Stud Math., 69, 81–95. Vogel, R., & Huth, M. (2010). Mathematical cognitive processes between the poles of mathematical technical terminology and the verbal expressions of pupils. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Language and Mathematics, 1, 1033-1042. Woods, G. (2009). An investigation into the relationship between the understanding and use of mathematical language and achievement in mathematics at the Foundation Stage. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 2191–2196. Yazıcı, Ö., & Gündüz, Y. (2010). Communication barriers in effective educational supervision and strategies to overcome these barriers. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 3(2), 3752. Yeşildere, S. (2007). The competencies of prospective primary school mathematics teachers in using mathematical language. Journal of Boğaziçi Education Faculty, 24(2), 61-70. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods for the social sciences]. Ankara: Seçkin. -129- M evlana International Journal of Education (M IJE) Vol. 5(1), pp. 130-140, 1 April, 2015 Available online at http://mije.mevlana.edu.tr/ http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.86.5.1 A Philosophical Analysis 1 On The Relationship Between The Problems Of The Modern Era And Education Mikail Söylemez Dicle University Ziya Gökalp Edcation Faculty,Educational Sciences Department Article history Received: 16.12.2014 Received in revised form: 30.03.2015 Accepted: 01.04.2015 Key words: Education, Problems of the era, M oral values Today there are many problems waiting for the support of education to be solved. Some of them arise from social uncertainty, economic deficiency, the worldviews of policy makers who lead societies, differences in faith and some from the societies’ having an eye on other nations’ surface and underground resources. When we consider today’s problems, we notice that the source and main cause of poverty, unemployment, prejudice, environmental pollution, loss of respect for humans, individual/state interests and falling away from the essence of being human, is the wrong or poor education (Söylemez, 2010). Is it limited to mentioned problems? The answer is simply no. When we examine the underlying reasons of such problems, we come to understand that educated people always play key roles. The reason for that must be the fact that educational institutions do not sufficiently nurture needed human capital who are hardworking, sophisticated and honest. The desired and ideal person is the one who has a good court conscience, virtuous, self-conscious, knowing the reason of his existence, respecting the universal values; open to learning and always self-improving. If that is not the case so far, the reason behind it should be sought in educational philosophies and curriculum programs applied at schools. I do believe that what conveys the aim and dynamism in a country is the need for individuals who improves and develops the country without harming the social structure, discovering and knowing himself and productive. I also believe that nobody has words to claim the opposite. Some academicians presented their papers generally on raising perfect individuals in terms of professional fields; such as a good medical doctor, a good engineer, a good chemist and a good nurse. I believe that it would better if they also stress the importance of a “good person” who respects human beings and human values besides having a good content knowledge. Considering the critical age, it is too late for changing the earlier acquired character and personality structure of a young person who is about to attend a university. The chances of changing the self, character, and personality, let us say re-shaping and re-moulding him becomes significantly reduced. What is left to higher education institutions is limited to offering such youths merely the professional knowledge, skills and techniques. I suppose my fellow academicians in that congress avoided the topic I stress here for the same reason. The problems I am trying to draw attention here, is the underlying reason of serious problems for individuals, societies and the globe in general. Modern educational philosophies, institutions, and some educators either overlook or avoid these issues, or they simply remain helpless. This paper is limited to insensitivity of education in response to certain problems of individuals, societies and the world facing as caused by the above mentioned issues. A part of this abstract is published on proceedings of IPALTE 2013 “International Perspectives on New Aspect of Learning in Teacher Education” held by University of Dicle. Correspondence: soylemezmikail@hotmail.com 1 Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 130-140, 1 April, 2015 Introduction With the accumulation of knowledge and experiences of the past, humanity has achieved a rapid development pace in many fields during the last few decades. One of the most important areas of success is the exciting improvements in science and technology. Considering the moral and humanistic values, have these advancements been useful to the civilizations or not? This paper will try to find answer to this question. If we leave aside the fact that the current technology provides people with great relief, nothing else forms a basis for the burnout of people. Underestimating the negative outcomes of science and technology such as environmental disasters drags the polluted mental interaction alongside. This mental pollution changed the status of Mother Nature as being a holy mother hug and filled with nuclear reactors which pollute both the human-nature relationship and the environment with devastation and exploitation. The main reason of it is that scientific information is used for profit purposes. Its reflection to the environment leads to the off balance of the natural environment” (İnam, 1993). Today’s societies on one hand losing their own cultural values through mass media and on the other hand losing universal values which keeps the individual and society alive. During this change a financial dissatisfaction has emerged among people. We face with this financial dissatisfaction as humans’ consuming things ruthlessly in vain, wasting the earth’s resources without thinking the future of humanity and as the greedy games of developed countries which are played against under developed countries in order not to face difficulties in the future. People chose over-consuming the resources while they could survive with the less and they were unable to afford the expanses with their income thus they headed for bribe and unearned gain finally they disturbed public peace. As a result of this over consumption our civilization is pushed towards chaos and universal values are violated. “Contrary to the expectations such as peace, social justice, happiness and equality; hunger, poverty, exploitation, war, violence, hatred and socio-economical injustice turned out to be modern civilization’s outcome values all of which have nothing to do with being human. Now European scientists who are the founders of the western civilization admit that the western civilization is in a very deep and irrecoverable social crisis. The most distinguishing indicator of this case is the European civilization’s using his power and energy more and more for eliminating the poor, sweeping away those who struggle for life and justice, destroying the family and society, off balancing the ecosystem thus finally moving through the extermination of the human race.” (Holland, Henriot, 1983; cited in Köylü, 2004). In the 19th century materialism and atheism spread to the world like a plague and ripped humanity off its core and moral values. In the last quarter of this century the movements and search of those who want to get rid of this moral disorder increased the return for religion. This search generally ended up as comeback to Islam. Islam which is felt more and more in Western societies, disturbed some circles. “Probably as a result of religious pluralism, on one side the beliefs about the doctrines of religion were refused and “no religion is superior to the other” principle was fostered. It was stated that the absolute religious reality was only acceptable in individual and private aspect. But on the other side it is seen that there is vigorous research and study on the accuracy of a specific religion. Apart from this a missionary movement seems to have increased (Hempelmann, 2003; cited in Köylü, 2004). In today’s society unfortunately we observe that belief-disbelief, classic-modern, science and -131- A Philosophical Analysis On The Relationship Between The Problems Of The Modern Era…M. Söylemez ignorance are hand in hand. The co-existence of such discrepancies in society is a disorder for humanity. The reason for this illness is that modernism and secularism are dominating the societies. As a result of this dominance, incredible traumas occurred in moral issues. Another outcome of secularism is that: “Secularism which exists as a result of separating the religion from politics, provided a number of gains like religious freedom, compulsory education and rights for women but excluded religion from almost all of the social life and left no room for religion in individual’s life. It is possible to see that secularism’s effect in many European countries. Many people spend their daily life and do jobs away from the religion or ignoring it. From now on religion is ignored or treated like a personal issue, and considerable declines in attending prayers are observed (Bosh, 1991; Conn, 1993; cited in, Köylü, 2004). After these explanations, global issues, the problems of the individual and society which the education has been insensitive so far and need to be solved by education will be analyzed respectively. 1. Insensitivities of Education for Individual’s Problems: People living in the modern World are more educated and have more nutrition and health opportunities when compared to the past. On the other hand it is clear that people are exposed to violence, drugs and depression because of corruptions in faith and moral values. Violence and violence related crimes are mostly seen among youths aged between 15 -25 and especially in developed countries. Of course the reason for these is not only the corruptions in faith and moral values. As stated earlier; unemployment, financial problems, internet, television programs and many more can be counted among the reasons. We also should not forget the fact that the faith is the most important factor compared to others. Among the reasons of this process, is pushing the masses into crime because of unemployment and poverty. Another important reason is constitution which facilitates putting people in prison. Policies adopted worldwide since 1980’s are outstanding for impoverishment and toughening in punishment policies (Özdek, 2002). Probably sexuality is the most serious one among other problems that youths face today. Now while youngsters are entering puberty at earlier ages, they prefer to get married at a later age for various reasons. Thus sexually active teens wait for a longer period when compared to the past. As a result of this change which modern world offers, today sexual relationship before marriage is accepted as normal in many countries while marriage was a largely accepted lifestyle and sex before marriage was not tolerated in many countries in the past. It is possible to see dramatic increase of numbers in many countries for this problem. Contemporary teens are of the opinion that sex before marriage is not a moral issue. Furthermore they adopt a philosophy which they think it is a personal right to choose. In addition the characteristics surrounding the modern life of individuals, both encourages the sex before marriage and have more opportunities through mass media (Clouse, 1991; akt, Köylü, 2004). At the end of the out of marriage relationships, girls are heading for abortion or leaving the baby after birth. Some of them go under serious depression and try to commit suicide. People who have no faith consider suicide as an escape or exit. However, according to the Islamic faith those who commit suicide are supposed to go to the hell forever. Diseases caused by out of marriage sexual relationships are the most important health problems. -132- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 130-140, 1 April, 2015 Alcohol and drugs are associated with modernism and secularism, pushing individuals into a chaos and threatening the social life. Some individuals use alcohol and drugs as they find it as a way out from loneliness or isolation. These alarming problem rates indicate that current young generation is in a serious crisis. What is even worse there is no serious effort to alleviate this case. The problems that seem trivial today may cause more serious problems in the future. Among them are; loneliness, depression, hopelessness, boredom, school problems and troubles within the family which are increasing day by day. Individuals within the society lose their self-respect and have severe dilemma about their personality and character. These people’s soul is far from the harmony and dynamism to survive. Their self-esteem and the intimidating manners of the soul turned them into a walking dead. Educational institutions cannot overcome these problems and accept them as normal. İkbal clearly explains this issue: “It is such an education that is like an acid which melts a person who stands out full of life then moulds him into a shape as it wishes. This acid has such power and influence that no other element in the nature has.” And he describes a man who had that kind of education as: “The teens look like a grown up man, but they are not. They denied their existence and expect help from others… Their hope and purpose of life is lost even in their cradle. They do not know to think on liberty.” (Nedvi, 1979; cited in, Tozlu, 2012) “’While in the early 1950’s 12% of teenagers between 14 and 16 agree that “I’m an important person”, in 1980’s 80% of teenagers perceive themselves as important. Today this rate is even higher. The following sentences important statements of “I generation” “I believe that I am a special person. I live my life freely anywhere I want. This body belongs to me. I use my body according to my own will. If I managed the world, it would be a better place to live…” This generation is far from altruism and empathy and is behave in a narcist way. Curriculums and programs under the title of “Personal Development” embitter this selfishness (Tozlu, 2012). Another important problem that individuals have is violence. Many people perceive violence as beating or fighting. According to the Violence Workshop report held by University of Dicle in Turkey in 2013; violence is harming people physically, sexually, psychologically or financially. Violence is defined also as all of the actions and attitudes of an individual which cause other people suffer by threatening them or preventing their freedom. Based on this definition the kinds of violence are verbal, physical, financial, psychological and social violence. According to this information violence is at alarming rates within the society. There are many factors increasing the violence within society. Among them are misconceptions about violence, mass media, people who grow up without values and faith, psychological, social and financial problems. The claims that in the modern educated man’s world violence will decrease, he will be more empathic, welcoming to others thus peace will prevail are still delusions. The World War, Gulf War, Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, Bosnia, Nagorno-Karabakh, Syria and Egypt’s agonies and chemical weapons… The discrepancies in educational philosophies are ignoring the universal values in education and corruptions in social norms. “Computers, internet, satellites and other mass media are fostering the violence and cause people to perceive it as “normal”. In computer games both the child and father are proud with -133- A Philosophical Analysis On The Relationship Between The Problems Of The Modern Era…M. Söylemez the number of deaths the child scored. Children are experiencing many kinds of violence everywhere including the books and cartoons. According to the studies a child experiences almost 8000 suicides until finishing the primary school. Today children say “"By the power of Grayskull..." "...I have the power!” Apart from this many artists and politicians prefer a language which spreads hatred and grudge instead of peace and respect for others. In our songs we have a discourse which increases the violence more. In the songs we come across such lyrics: “I gouge out your eye, tear your hair, I shoot a bullet into my head. God damn you!” In movies main characters have utterances as “I cut your head” The language of violence in sports, art and politics triggers the desires to obliterate so spreads violence subconsciously. Violence is perceived as if normal in that way. A rich family’s son cut his girlfriend’s head and threw the head into the dustbin in Istanbul. A surgeon was killed while working in Gaziantep. A little school child was screaming as “I am fed up with violence at home, at school in the streets, everywhere. A bus was set to the fire and a girl was burned to death in İstanbul. Many women in Turkey who wants a divorce and applies to the court are exposed to maltreatment of their husbands.” (Eyigün, 2013) The above mentioned problems are not limited to Turkey sample; these events are observed in any society worldwide. The reason for that, educational philosophies are not consistent and universal. More informed and religion integrated moral approach is not examined seriously in educational philosophies. 2. Insensitivities of Education for Society’s Problems: The family which is the milestone of the nation is being demolished. The source of our happiness and inner peace is in serious danger. The divorce rates are increasing day by day. The couples who states that we are happy to get married now says that “We are not meant for each other, we should get divorced” Many people have problems in their marriage life. But why? Moral problems that humanity faces today are threatening the families. No one can deny the significance of the verbal communication’s quality which creates the harmony within family and society. I am going to stress “sensory communication” which pedagogue Adem GÜNEŞ refers to as the cause of moral destruction within family and society. “Sensory communication is a kind of connection between people which is carried out through the senses. In other words, we can define “sensory” or “emotional” communication as communicating with others using all verbal or non-verbal delivery items based mainly on senses (Güneş, 2012; cited in, Söylemez, 2012). For example a woman holding an item left from her dead father and remembering the old days burst into tears… At that moment her husband looking her in the eye and says “I see you”. The woman tries to understand subconsciously whether he told this sentence by heart. If the sentence is really meant for her and the woman perceives it to be so; this sentence is really important for her. But if we consider the opposite scenario, the feelings of the husband is not included within this sentence and if the woman realizes the formality the words of the husband may not be consoling for her. The woman in our example prefers husband’s the utterances which are said by heart with emotions rather than talking for hours far from the wife’s emotional world. If the husband says “I see you” and keeps enjoying around, his wife thinks that “he is cheating her” thus the trust is broken. We come across with the character’s dilemma here. We witness double -134- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 130-140, 1 April, 2015 dealers in all layers of the society as well as the family. Marriages are built on mistakes. Marriage is one of the most important phases of life and it is a long journey. The couples who are going for this journey either make it fun or turn it into a nightmare. It is for sure that people marry to be happy and try to find the happiness they have always dreamt for. How much do you think the marriages today satisfy this expectation? Can we really fulfill our expectations within the family or marriage? Why do the families break up? Actually the answers for these questions lay in pre-marriage term. Marriages are built on mistakes and the outcome is breaking up soon. There are many mistakes which are made before marriage. Couples get married without knowing each other very well. Couples have such logic as: “Let’s get married first then we decide on what is right and what is wrong.” Men and women choose who to marry before knowing what sharing the life means. Then trial and error phase starts. Then they decide to end the marriage. What is the role of education here? Newlyweds do not pay attention to mutual ideas. Marriage is not just about satisfying the pleasures of the couple. According to our faith and culture individuals marry for gains that are both for life and afterlife. In other words people be happy with the life they lead and the children they raise. For this reason it is important that the partner in a marriage have morals and faith. Once people would mean that with the words “presentable or as straight as a die” I ask how many people care about it now. I wonder how much do families value and try to live with respect, love, loyalty, manners, empathy, sincerity, obedience and honor? At first what unites the couples together is the similarities between them. But what sticks them together for years is their differences. We should treat the differences as an opportunity to learn instead of a reason for divorce or fight. A smart couple tries to learn each other’s differences in a short time. They search ways to use these differences for their benefit (Söylemez, 2012). Values are the most powerful tools to foster motivation. The best way to change the undesired behavior is to make an explanation based on main values. To tie the family members to the family one should address his or her feelings. If two people are connected each other with common values their relationship lasts forever. But if their values are different their relationship lasts shorter and they have more problems with their marriage. Thus the couples should have common values to have a bridge that connects them. Understanding the individual’s values means to know what is important for him. Values are the beliefs that guide people in their decisions and show what people care about. Our world image is a combination of our values. We respond to the world according to our values. To understand a family we need to understand the kinds of responses they give in their daily life. The decisions are based on values and exist within the subconscious of the family members (Söylemez, 2011). In societies in which values education is ignored, the booming of psychological, pedagogical, social and faith oriented problems. The destruction of the values demolishes the family and the society. The family is the cornerstone of the society. In the past if a member of the family has improper behavior the head of the family would -135- A Philosophical Analysis On The Relationship Between The Problems Of The Modern Era…M. Söylemez imply that with a glance and that member would change his behavior in desired way. No expert of pedagogy can question that glance. If he does so, he faces the moral enforcement of the society which roots in the culture of the past. While this fact is crystal clear, modern educational philosophies stress that “Transferring the culture is among the duties of education.” We should question why education is ignoring that task. Alienation is another important problem that many people suffer from today. Although the rates show that many teens can adapt to the society they live in, there are studies which indicates the adaptation problems of teenagers for the society and their own self. These members of the society try to overcome the stress of social exclusion and suffer from behavioral alienation. Now the young looks for his own identity and searches the ways to be accepted and approved as an individual (Davies, 1991; cited in, Köylü, 2004). Social isolation is another problematic area of modern education and civilization. The change in the structure of the family forced the members to live in an isolated world within the family. This change brought many important moral problems along. Industry based working life ended large families and formed a basis for small families. This led to the increase in divorce rates. The children are the most adversely affected ones in this change. The children whose parents are divorced generally have problems. Among them are showing misbehavior and emotional abnormalities. In addition if the parents refuse them they are isolated from the society with the feeling of loneliness. We can name this as social phobia. In the last quarter of the previous century some feminist movements were against the marriage and continuity of it. They argued that the marriage was a shackle which deprives women of their freedom. They proposed part-time marriage instead. Furthermore marriage against payment (A rich woman’s getting married with a moderate or poor man till she has a child) (Söylemez, 2012) was another devastating factor for the values which the family is built on. Another issue which has outcomes for the society is abortion of the illegitimate child. There is no need to discuss the moral aspect of abortion. Women who had an abortion face psychological problems as, guilt, shame, escape from the society and even committing suicide. But how sensitive is the educational institutions for these depressions. 3. Insensitivities of Education for Global Problems: Problems and depressions are modern civilization’s bitter fruit gift for humanity. These problems are at serious levels for the individual, society and globe in general. Science and technology offers many facilities to teenagers in many fields, but made them face serious troubles in terms of morals and ethics. In my opinion the most threatening of these problems is the global one. If we look analyze the World we see socio-economical inequalities and the increase in conflicts and violence in developing and Muslim countries. Especially we do witness revolutionary rebellions under the title of democracy and civil wars in countries which are rich in underground resources. Egypt is outstanding example of it. The western countries did not even call it as “overthrow”. To prevent that kind of events it is essential to discuss the principles and messages of Abrahamic religions, morals and universal values as well as universal integrity through educational institutions. Those principles should be analyzed carefully and then they should be turned into an educational philosophy in the curriculums. If pedagogues and educational institutions are insensitive to this issue the results I think will be more devastating. -136- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 130-140, 1 April, 2015 Turning the science into an ideological tool, preferring the minority’s welfare to other people’s health, not respecting to the developing countries for the last two centuries, leaving a polluted world for the next generations is a desperate situation. For the sake of modern science, thousands of cultural and civilization elements are being destroyed. Vital resources are plundered. Ideologized science is trying to resemble everything to it. On the other side it is giving harm to the nature and ecosystem. Interfering with the ecosystem is so much that, we come across with ecological pollution which threatens human life and the next generations. Some chances occurred in the genetic codes of the all animals because of various radiations, chemical substances and other environmental factors. Although improved noticeably, industrialized countries are at great risk for environmental pollution. As chemical industry provides many kinds of products and determining the harm of synthetic materials to the nature takes time, the earth turned into a trial and error laboratory and the environmental activists cannot do much about it. Mental pollution has appalled moral values too. If we define the moral only as our responsibility for the society, what about the nature? How much is the moral responsibility of a farmer who sets on fire the margins of his field. We face with the moral pollution as the sinking oil tankers in the oceans, nuclear waste that are sent to the underdeveloped countries, explosion of nuclear power plants, computer viruses or internet crimes don’t we? Not only the trouble of refining the industrial waste which includes mercury but also agricultural or atmospheric contaminators and accidents which happen in chemical industries depends on legal arrangements and technological development. The quality of the city atmosphere is neither a research nor a scientific methodology issue. It is all about politic decisions and investment preferences. The accumulation of these problems is caused by one day thought and precaution, the decision makers’ choice to deal with them in a way that provides political, personal or easy prestige rather than making huge investments which affects the whole country finally (Ulugbay, 2008; cited in, Köylü, 2004). The destruction of the rain forests, causing global warming via emitting various gases into the atmosphere is the insensitivity of positivist educational philosophy which is destitute of universal or moral values, isn’t it? “Hasan Ali Yücel also denotes that setting a bridge between the materialistic and moral values is the most vital and most important duty which to be thought on and grasped by humanity at the first place. This duty needs to be reviewed in today’s world in which millions of children die of hunger, nearly a half billion people suffer from malnutrition and have insufficient health services while developing countries spend much more money on weapons than they do for education and health services.” (Kenan, 2004) It is easy to realize that those who are active in polluting the environments except for their own, are the ones who cause the violation of financial sharing balance. Moral problems are not only individual or national. Moral problems are turning into a “universal moral problems” some time later. Industries produce 36 chemical waste weighting more than two billion kilograms each year which mainly induce cancer and other chronic disorders. As a result more than half of the water we drink contains toxic chemicals. The consequence of these events is expected to be severe problems in the ecosystem because of the warming in the atmosphere (Colaw, 1991; cited in, Köylü, 2004). -137- A Philosophical Analysis On The Relationship Between The Problems Of The Modern Era…M. Söylemez We can guess the size of global social crisis in case of facing military based sickness, war, tension and conflicts as well as socio-economical injustice. The egoist frameworks that are based on peer benefits which roots in modern educated peoples’ minds. As a consequence of sacrificing moral values and respecting the nature, many manners which affect the society’s harmony and health are ignored. Perspectives to the environment and value weakened nature is deprived of the moral aspect and just considered for financial benefit thus it started to be misused. Because the contents of moral education lacks themes as protecting the moral values, genesis of human beings, earning without harming others and respect for the nature The role of education is to save people from this mind pollution and soul shift thus leave a better world for the next generations. That depends on raising self-conscious and self discovering people via education. People looked for happiness at the sky in medieval ages. Today’s humanity is doing so in the nature. These two partisan pursuits are wrong. The people should look for their happiness with a metaphysical approach in their clear soul’s depth and in the future promising environment that they live. Conclusion As is ruining destruction easy. The imitate the discussed before, the main reason for both individual and social-cultural problems the human honor as a result of cultural aggravation. We cannot ignore the of life, human and nature as the restriction of joy and pleasure madness is not case is the same both for the western civilization and the other countries which Europe. Talking about the problems of the era, the issues as poverty, unemployment, prejudice, pollution, absence of respect for humanity, individual/national benefits and people’s migration from their essence are well known by everyone. It is evident that today’s technology facilitates human life but if misused it causes a lot more tragedy. Modern societies lose their cultural values as well as universal values which unite and keep the people and society together. During this change financial dissatisfaction arises in developed countries at global scale. Secularism which existed as a result of separating the religion from politics played an important role in the problems as it ignored the religious values in social life. The coexistence of belief and disbelief, classic and modern, science and irrationality within the society created a character dilemma of the individuals. As an outcome moral disruption and unbelievable calamities existed. In the end sexual problems which threaten both the family and health are increasing. Unemployment, financial problems, internet, television shows created the violence which is the biggest problem of the era. The problems of the era are not limited to the society and individual. We face socioeconomical inequalities around the world, wars at developing countries, faith and partisan conflicts (especially in the Muslim world). Analyzing this case more carefully, it is known that developed countries have a role in this case. The ideas which root in positivist educational philosophies are also another reason for the -138- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 130-140, 1 April, 2015 destruction and the loss of nature’s holiness. In order to end forever the mentioned problems above, modern education needs to solve the problems fundamentally. Values that are kept out of modern education, especially the moral ones are handed in a manner that they are judged and decided on subjectively. The reason is that positivism fosters modern education. Positivism cannot guide people to find what is right. As a consequence there is a need for an approach to education which fosters main moral values such as justice, mercy, responsibility and philanthropy. According to the Cartesian view developed by Rene Descartes (1591-1650), the failure to balance the soul and body relationship taking a step further misinterpretation of physics and metaphysics dualism led to the “Cogito, er go sum” and created the term “self” and had devastating results. If an individual attaches importance to that term too much it creates the emotions such as pride, arrogance and egocentrism. Considering the social scale, the thesis as “the society think all the other societies are smaller than us and they should be exploited for the good of us” has destroyed all the universal values. As explained above, modern educational philosophies’ closing their doors for universal moral values as a result of Auguste Comte’s positivism which is based on Descartes’ dualistcartesian view and Newton’s mechanical world view; induced insensitivity of the individual and society for global problems. Considering the criticisms, I think it would be unfair to say that modern educational philosophies are at the end of the road. I want to tell that undesirable results overshadow the positive outcomes thus it is insensitive to many modern problems. As Professor Necmettin Tozlu states “It seems that our educational philosophy is not the one which can foster the feelings of responsible liberty to the individuals that we raise.” For this reason people do not feel responsible for their actions and always blaming others. But it is important to place the feeling of conscience thus improving self criticism among people. Now it is only possible to shape the minds which are conscious to accept the guilt, responsible and thoughtful.” I think that his finding is valid both for us and for the societies around the world. What is meant by education here is “… the one which ensures grace and prepares individuals to watch willingly the idea of perfect citizen and teaches how to obey and govern within justice.” It is clear that the views which aim to raise individuals who judge the good and the bad based on benefits instead of Godly virtual values, letting to explain ideas approved by politics and accepts information as it is without questioning are desperate for finding solutions for today’s problems. It is necessary to build a new system which installs accountability for the God and ethic rules -rather than the mere rules- into the hearts and conscience of those educated within educational institutions. There are many reasons for the changes which occur in societies both socially and individually. But it is stressed by many pedagogues and crucial to develop educational philosophies which try to solve above mentioned problems sincerely. -139- A Philosophical Analysis On The Relationship Between The Problems Of The Modern Era…M. Söylemez References Aydın S.M.,(1994). İnsan Yetiştirme Modelimiz ve Değer Eğitimi, 1 st Educational Philosophy Congress. Van Baltacıoğlu, İ. H. (1972). Milli Talim ve Terbiye Tetkikatına Methal Milli Talim ve Terbiye Mecmuası. Eyigün, S.(2013).Tüm Yönleriyle Şiddet. Dicle University Publishing, Diyarbakır. İnam, A.(1993). Teknoloji Benim Neyim Oluyor. Alamut Publishing, Ankara. Kenan, S.(2004). Modern Eğitim Oluşum Sürecinde Değerler Eğitimi Nasıl Zayıfladı Macit, N.(1994), Zihinsel Kirlenme Bağlamında Eğitimimiz.Education Congress, Van. Tozlu, N.(2012).Eğitim Felsefesi. Altın Kalem Publishing, İzmir. Söylemez, M.(1997). Problem ve Çözümleriyle Eğitimimiz. Çağlayan Publishing; İzmir. Söylemez, M.(2012).Aile İçi Sosyal İletişim, Altın Kalem Publishing, İzmir. Söylemez, M., Ardıç T.(2013).Tüm Yönleriyle Şiddet. Dicle Üniversitesi Publishing ,Diyarbakır. Söylemez, M. (2010). Eğitimde Zihinsel Kirlilik ve Çevre. Agriculture, Nature and Environment Symposium. Diyarbakır. Uluğbay, H., Çevre Kirliliği II, Sızıntı.com.tr. 26 Nisan 2008. Web: http://www.zaman.com.tr/melih-arat/egitim-oldu-yasasinogrenme_2096247.html (Retrieved on: 23.09.2013) Web: http://www.zaman.com.tr/yorum_batiyi-bir-de-boyle-okumak_2112643.html (Retrieved on: 23.09.2013) -140- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE) Vol. 5(1), pp. 141-164, 1 April, 2015 Available online at http://mije.mevlana.edu.tr/ http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.69.5.1 Evaluating the Teacher’s Guides of a Recently Published Course Book Series for Young Learners in Turkey Seyit Omer Gok Foreign Languages School, Gediz University, Izmir, Turkey It is acknowledged that Teachers’ Guides (TGs) are indispensable component of course book packages today; however, there is little research on their evaluation in the Received in revised form: literature. It goes without saying that TGs are of a great 03.04.2015 support to teachers, especially to the novice ones, in the sense that they provide instructions essential for the accurate and Accepted: 04.04.2015 successful use of the materials. Therefore, the studies reporting the findings of TGs evaluations can help develop more Key words: effective TGs in the future. The aim of this study is to evaluate Teachers’ Guides, Materials the TGs of a recently published course book series for young Evaluation, Materials Design and Development learners (YLs) in Turkey. First, it shares the results of an objective analysis carried out by the researcher with the help of a checklist designed based on the checklists already in the literature. Then, it reports the findings obtained through a questionnaire conducted among forty-four teachers using this course book series. Finally, it discusses the findings in relation to the context and suggests some future implications. In general, both the analysis and evaluation results have revealed that there are some deficiencies in the TG which should be addressed so that it can be more effective for the teachers in this context. Article history Received: 28.08.2014 Introduction Since the Education Reform in 1997, English has been taught as the compulsory foreign language from grade-4 (age 10) upwards in Turkey. However, in the private schools, which are highly popular and great in number, English has intensively been taught from kindergarten upwards. Today, English lessons in private schools range between 6 hours and 20 hours per week (much more than state schools) depending on the language policy of a school. Since there are neither curriculums nor materials designed by Ministry of Education for the students who are younger than 10, most of the private schools have to use the course books and materials produced by well-known international publishers. The schools, which the course book series in focus has been created for, are a chain of private primary schools spread across Turkey. Since their opening, these schools have been applying the same policy and system, e.g. they have the same aims, the same number of lesson hours, the same tests, the same classroom size etc. English language teaching materials, especially the ones for YLs, used to be a problem for these schools. The main reasons were that the e-mail: seyit.gok@gediz.edu.tr Mobile: +90 505 672 97 65 Evaluating the Teacher’s Guides of a Recently Published Course Book Series…S. O. Gok materials chosen did not fit the needs, wants, interests and cultural values of both the teachers and students. In addition, the course books chosen did not fit the number of the hours of English lessons and they needed to be supplemented by other extra materials, which was causing additional cost for the parents. For these reasons and others, the materials chosen used to stay in use no more than a year; a trial and error process was experienced repeatedly for years. Consequently, seven years ago it was unanimously agreed that a series of course books for the primary level had to be created to eliminate these problems. A local publishing house commissioned two award-winning authors to write this series. As a result, a five-levelled course book series was created and it has been in use for about six years now. Literature Review Materials Evaluation in General It is widely agreed that materials, especially course books, play the central role in many language teaching and learning contexts across the world. This may mean that they have an enormous influence on language teaching and learning worldwide. It is also suggested that evaluation of the materials has a great potential to influence the way teachers operate (Hutchinson, 1987). Tomlinson (2003, p. 15) defines materials evaluation as ‘a procedure that involves measuring the value (or potential value) of a set of learning materials’. However, there are various views on materials evaluation in the literature. It is widely acknowledged that evaluation is mainly carried out to choose an appropriate course book, which fits a particular context best, before starting to run a particular language course. This stage is called ‘pre-use evaluation’ (McGrath, 2002, p. 14). It is obviously seen that more attention has been paid to predictive evaluation (pre-use evaluation) in the literature. However, pre-use evaluation has been criticised for being impressionistic (Tomlinson, 2003). This type of evaluation can only give ideas about the potential value of materials rather than their ‘actual value’, which can only be understood after they are put into use (Tomlinson 2003). It is agreed that the evaluation process should continue even after the material has been chosen because some evaluation questions can only be answered once the materials are in use: ‘in-use evaluation’ (McGrath, 2002, p. 15). Besides, Daoud and CelceMurcia (1979, p. 306) point out that ‘the ultimate evaluation of a text comes with actual classroom use.’ Similarly, McDonough and Shaw (1993, p. 62) note that the material’s ‘ultimate success or failure may only be determined after a certain amount of classroom use.’ Moreover, Tomlinson (2003, p. 24) writes that, although in-use evaluation is given little importance in the literature, ‘it can be more objective and reliable than pre-use evaluation as it makes use of measurement rather than prediction.’ In addition to pre-use and in-use evaluations, McGrath (2002), Tomlinson (2003) and Ellis (1997) suggest ‘post-use/retrospective evaluation’ to weigh the effects and outcomes of the materials. Tomlinson (2003) appreciates post-use evaluation as ‘the most valuable’ type of evaluation. Besides, Ellis (1998) states that the evaluation guides used previously as a pre-use evaluation can also be used as post-use evaluation. Skierso (1991, p. 441) agrees that ‘a reevaluation of the selected text, perhaps using the identical checklist both times, would help the teacher to decide whether to continue using the adopted text or to look for a new one’. However, although this idea may be very beneficial, only a few teachers are willing to do that (Ellis, 1998). McDonough and Shaw (1993, p. 61) approach the evaluation in two stages; ‘external evaluation that offers a brief ‘overview’ of the materials from the outside (cover, introduction, -142- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 141-164, 1 April, 2015 table of contents), which is then followed by a closer and more detailed internal evaluation’. Similarly, Cunningsworth (1995, p. 1) coins the idea of ‘impressionistic overview’ and ‘indepth evaluation’. However, Tomlinson (2003) suggests approaching materials evaluation in a principled, systematic and rigorous ways and explains how to develop criteria for materials evaluation in detail. Besides, McGrath (2002, p. 13) defines the evaluations, which are carried out without any feedback or pre-use trial, as ‘armchair evaluations’. In addition, McGrath (2002, p. 14) views materials evaluation as a cyclical process and he believes that there are two dimensions to a systematic approach to materials evaluation: ‘macro’ (the approach, in a broad sense) and ‘micro’ (the steps or set of techniques employed) evaluation. However, Ellis (1998) reports that the main focus has always been on macro evaluation and there are only a few micro evaluation examples. Littlejohn (1998, p. 191) mentions a three-levelled framework approach to examine the materials and look inside the ‘Trojan Horse’: ‘Level 1, what is physically there in the materials? ; Level 2, what is required of users (teachers and students)? ; Level 3, what is implied (underlying principles and roles proposed for teachers and students?’ McGrath (2002, p. 17-56) also approaches the materials evaluation by narrowing it from ‘first-glance evaluation’ to ‘close evaluation’. McGrath (2002, p. 25-29) reveals the methods of analysis and evaluation in the literature, which are namely ‘the impressionistic method, the checklist method, the in depth method’. It is obvious from the literature that ‘the checklist method’ is the most common and practical one as most of the writers mentioned in this paper and the others have suggested one (Cunningsworth, 1984, 1995; Daoud&Celce-Murcia, 1979; Ellis, 1995, 1998; Littlejohn, 1998; McDonough, 1998; McDonough & Shaw, 1993; Richards, 2001; Sheldon, 1987, 1988; Skierso, 1991; Dougill, 1987; Tomlinson, 1999; Williams, 1983; Tucker, 1975; Harmer, 1991; Breen &Candlin 1987). However, Tomlinson (2003) finds some of these checklists impressionistic and biased, which leads to subjectivity. Therefore, McGrath (2002, p. 29) suggests that there should be an ‘integrated approach’ (of the methods mentioned above) and this approach should ‘involve at least two stages’ (pre/in/post-use evaluation). On the other hand, Hutchinson (1987, p. 44) sees materials evaluation as ‘an interactive process’ and he points out that ‘materials evaluation also need to be approached as a matching process, in which the values and assumptions of the teaching/learning situation are matched to the values and assumptions of the available materials’. He further shows the stages of the matching process: ‘(1) Define the criteria on which the evaluation will be based. (2) Analyse the nature and underlying principles of the particular teaching/learning situation (3) Analyse the nature and underlying principles of the available materials and test the analysis in the classroom. (4)Compare the findings of the two analyses.’ (Hutchinson, 1987, p. 41) Besides, Tomlinson (2003) illustrates the difference between analysis and evaluation by saying that their objectives and procedures are not the same. An evaluation, which is subjective, focuses on users and context together with the materials, whereas analysis focuses only on materials, which makes it more objective (Tomlinson, 2003, p. 16). In addition, Sheldon (1988, p. 245) notes that course book evaluation is essentially subjective and ‘no neat formula, grid or system will ever provide a definite yardstick’. In addition, Cunningsworth -143- Evaluating the Teacher’s Guides of a Recently Published Course Book Series…S. O. Gok (1995, p. 5) suggests that ‘it is important to limit the number of the criteria used, the number of the questions asked, to manageable portions. Otherwise, we risk being swamped in a sea of detail.’ However, Hutchinson (1987, p. 41) claims that ‘the more information the evaluator can gather about the nature of a textbook, the better will be the choice’. In my opinion, every single aspect of a course book -by keeping the context in mind- should be questioned no matter how much detail it reveals; because once a course book is chosen it is impossible to replace it until the following year, which means a waste of time and money. Teachers’ Guides Evaluation TGs are probably one of the most important components of course books, especially for teachers. ‘The detailed resources, guidance, suggestions, and instructions which they provide are crucial to the successful use of the materials, and teachers using the course must understand the TGs and relate to them effectively if their use of the course material is to be productive’ (Cunningsworth&Kusel 1991, p. 128). There is no need to discuss the importance of TGs in detail here as it is not the focus of this paper. However, it is worth mentioning here that in the context previously mentioned, TGs play a vital role mainly because an unfamiliar approach has been introduced through the course book series. Also, there are many teachers who are inexperienced in teaching English to young learners, and thus very dependent on TGs. As Williams (1983, p. 252) says ‘the textbook should provide appropriate guidance for the teacher of English who is not a native speaker of English’. Cunningsworth&Kusel (1991, p. 128) notes that TGs evaluation ‘is a neglected area in the literature’. Among the innumerable evaluation checklists, only a few take TGs evaluation into account (Gearing, p. 1999). For example, Harmer (1991, p. 284) makes only brief reference to TGs evaluation at the end of his evaluation checklist. Breen and Candlin (1987) offer a large number of questions for general evaluation, which include only five questions related to evaluation of TGs. Sheldon’s (1988) comprehensive course book evaluation criteria include six TGs evaluation questions under ‘Guidance’. However, all of these criteria should be updated and expanded because recently TGs have been improved and changed considerably and therefore they deserve more attention. In the literature, Coleman (1985), Cunningsworth&Kusel (1991), Skierso (1991), Cunningsworth (1995), Hemsley (1997) and Gearing (1999) have done the most comprehensive coverage of TGs evaluation. My aim here is to create ‘more accurate and revealing criteria’ (Hutchinson, 1987, p. 37) to evaluate the TGs. ‘The only reasonable way to evaluate is to ask your own questions about the assumptions underlying the materials’ (Hutchinson, 1987, p. 37). Therefore, I prefer to create my own evaluation checklist based on the suggestions made so far by all of the writers mentioned previously. Methodology Tomlinson (2003) draws attention to the differences between an analysis and an evaluation. First, ‘an analysis focuses on the materials and it aims to provide an objective analysis of them’ (Tomlinson 2003, p. 16). However, ‘an evaluation focuses on the users of the materials and makes judgements about their effects’ and therefore ‘no matter how structured, criterion referenced and rigorous and evaluation is, it will be essentially subjective’ (Tomlinson 2003, p. 16). Secondly, ‘an analysis questions can be answered by either ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; otherwise, they can be answered ‘factually’’ (Tomlinson, 2003, p. 16). However, evaluation questions can be answered on a cline between ‘Strongly Agree’, ‘Agree’ -144- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 141-164, 1 April, 2015 and ‘Strongly Disagree’, ‘Disagree’ and also given scores for calculation (Tomlinson 2003); this will show the effect of the materials in a particular context. As mentioned earlier, this is a five-levelled course book series, which has separate TG for each level. However, the researcher thought that the results would be more reliable if he focused only on the TG of one level of the series; as a result of this, only the TG of the level 3 of the series was scrutinized. First of all, in the light of Tomlinson’s (2003) suggestions, an analysis of the TG was conducted with the help of the checklist created by the researcher. The checklist and the results of the analysis can be seen in Appendix-A. Soon after the analysis, a questionnaire was designed mainly based on the analysis questionsto be completed by the teachers using these materials (See Appendix-B). The questionnaire with an explanation and a consent letter were sent to the heads of the English (HoEs) of the schools via e-mail. The HoEs were requested to share these questionnaires with their teachers teaching the level 3 of the series. Consequently, forty-four teachers in twenty-one different schools have responded to the questionnaire. The results of the questionnaire can be seen in Appendix-C. Discussion As the analysis and the questionnaire both show, the rationale, methodology, objectives and syllabus of the course book, have been presented explicitly and clearly throughout the first thirteen pages of the TG. However, the TG does not provide the correct or suggested answers for the exercises and tasks in the student’s book. This might be because it is assumed that the teachers’ level is relatively high. In my opinion, teachers would save time if they were given the answers in the TG, which does not seem to be a big issue for a publishing house. Besides, the TG does not provide any methodological and/or pedagogical explanations for the procedures it is suggesting throughout the book. This might have been very useful for novice and incompetent teachers. As Nunan (1991) and Edge & Wharton (1998) point out, clear explanations on methodology in a course book, especially when introducing a new approach, can be very useful in terms of professional development. However, whether a TG should undertake this role or not is open to debate, except for the situations in which teacher have limited access to methods manuals and training courses(Cunningsworth and Kusel, 1991). At the very beginning of the book, TG gives information about YLs and their learning styles. Furthermore, throughout the book the suggested procedures and activities support this information. Nevertheless, there is no explicit guidance about how to develop students’ learning strategies and foster learning; this guidance can normally be very useful, especially for novice teachers, as it is something that requires both knowledge and experience. As Cunningsworth and Kusel (1991, p. 129) say ‘TGs seldom provide explicit statements concerning their function or use, but where these are provided, they help the teacher to form a clearer perception of the role and potential of the TG, allowing it to be employed more effectively’. Throughout the TG there is no guidance about the teacher’s role. There seem to be some activities or situations in which the teacher’s role should be explained explicitly. For example, at page 37 of the TG, it is not made clear what the teacher should do while the students are reading the story in silence and underlining any words they do not understand? (See Appendix-D) On the other hand, Richards (1993) warns that the decisions generally taken based on TG may lower and reduce the teachers’ cognitive skills and abilities, which may result in ‘deskilling’. -145- Evaluating the Teacher’s Guides of a Recently Published Course Book Series…S. O. Gok ‘If textbooks and teachers’ manuals teach, what do teachers do? The answer is that the teacher’s role is trivialized and marginalized to that of little more than a technician. His or her job is to study the teacher’s manual and follow the procedures laid out there. Rather than viewing teaching as a cognitive process which is highly interactional in nature, teaching is seen as something that can be pre-planned by others, leaving the teacher to do little more than act out predetermined procedures.’ (Richards 1993, 48) Nevertheless, in my opinion, there should be some detailed information about a teacher’s role, at least in general at the first pages where methodology is explained. This is because not every teacher has the same kind of perception in the same circumstances, which sometimes leads to misinterpretations; thus, the expected roles ought to be made explicit to the teacher in the TG. However, there is no question that a teacher will eventually have the opportunity to make her/his own choice after s/he has read what s/he is expected to do. Another point is that the TG does not provide specific anticipated teaching or learning problems related to the targeted language items and how to handle them at the beginning of a lesson (Appendix-E). Moreover, throughout the book there is no specific information about the language items the students struggle most in this particular context although these series have been created specifically for these learners. Indeed, grammar teaching is the most sensitive and controversial issue while teaching to YLs in this context. Even very experienced teachers can sometimes struggle to handle grammar with YLs. More importantly, if a teacher takes a wrong step at this stage, this may lead to bigger problems such as reluctance, discouragement and fossilization. Therefore, based on the previous experiences, there should be guidance in the TG about probable difficulties the students in this context are likely to confront. In the TG, lesson plans are given with their objectives and teachers are told what to do stepby-step for each lesson, which seems useful and beneficial for the teachers at first glance. However, as questionnaire results also revealed, none of these plans takes unpredictable problems into account and provides optional routes, or suggests how to deal with the activities that do not go according to the plan. In addition, the TG does not advise how to present the lessons in various ways, which makes it too prescriptive. Nonetheless, the TG encourages extra activities and notes by giving a space under ‘My Notes & Extra Activities’ nearly on every page (See Appendix-F). Besides, although these course book series are for YLs, it gives big importance to explicit pronunciation teaching. In the TG there is detailed information about how to produce sounds, which may be very beneficial unless the teachers take it for granted (See Appendix-F). As for the assessment, there is information in the introduction part of TG which is explaining how to assess the students’ progress. Also, after every two units there is a review unit containing a lot of activities and exercises, which may help teachersto assess her/his students. Besides, there is a separate book in teacher’s pack, which has many quizzes and worksheets for assessment. However, there is no explicit encouragement or suggestion for the teacher to reflect on each lesson. It may be very useful to have a short guideline after each lesson for the teacher to follow and consider how well the lesson has gone. Nevertheless, the teachers already teach over twenty-five hours per week to more than three classes at different levels and I think this idea would be perceived as an extra burden for them, which they would never approach to do. Although this course book series has technological aids such as Interactive DVD and -146- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 141-164, 1 April, 2015 Interactive Whiteboard (IWB) application, TG does not give any guidance about them throughout the book. In the introduction part of the TG, it is said ‘the DVD encourages independent learning, co-ordination and computer skills’. However, both teachers and students should be reminded about the DVD throughout the course. TG does not even mention IWB application; however, this may be because the IWB application was launched long after the TG was created. Perhaps, IWB application will be integrated into the TG in the near future. Questionnaire results also show that most of the teachers think that the TG helps them keep the students’ motivation high, whereas some of the teachers do not agree with that. This result shows us that no material can meet the needs, wants and interests of all the teachers and students even if it is designed after careful needs analysis conducted with the end-users. It is also a fact that ‘no textbook or set of materials is likely to be perfect’ (McDonough & Shaw, 1993, p. 61). TG provides letters, both in Turkish and in English, to be sent to the parents after every two unit (Appendix-G). In my opinion, this application may help teachers not only to inform the parents about their children’s progress but also to get them to involve in their children’s language learning process. Finally, it is obviously seen that the TG gives cultural background information when necessary (Appendix-H). Though this information is highly required for a teacher to be able to explain cultural issue to her/his students, not many TGs contain it. It is likely that teachers will omit the texts, activities etc. that require them to obtain further background information from outside. Conclusion This paper has shared the findings of the evaluation of a TG, which belongs to the Level-3 of a course book series designed specifically for a chain of private primary schools across Turkey. ‘The textbook is a tool, and the teacher must know not only how to use it, but how useful it can be’ (Williams 1983, 254). TGs can be of a great help for teachers to accomplish this and understand the materials and their objectives clearly – if only sufficient importance is given for their design and development. ‘If a TG is deficient, through omission, inaccuracy, or whatever other reason, the quality of teaching is likely to suffer. A TG carefully attuned to its readership, on the other hand, can enhance teaching quality at remarkably low cost’ (Cunningsworth&Kusel, 1991, p. 129). Therefore, evaluation of a TG may be as important as evaluation of a course book, especially in particular situations and contexts. References Breen, M. and Candlin, C.(1987) ‘Which materials?: a consumer’s and designer’s guide’ (pp13-30) in Sheldon, L. E. (ed.). ELT Textbooks and Materials: Problems in Evaluation and Development, ELT Document 126, London: Modern English Publications/The British Council. Celce-Murcia, M. (1991) (ed.) Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. Boston: Heinle and Heinle. Coleman, H.(1985.) 'Evaluating teachers' guides: Do teachers' guides teach teachers?' in -147- Evaluating the Teacher’s Guides of a Recently Published Course Book Series…S. O. Gok Alderson, J.C. (ed.). Evaluation.Lancaster Practical Papers in English Language Education.Vol. 6. Oxford: Pergamon. Cunningsworth, A. and Kusel, P. (1991) ‘Evaluating teacher’s guides’, English Language Teaching Journal 45/2, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cunningsworth, A. (1984) Evaluating and selecting EFL Teaching Materials, London: Heinemann. Cunningsworth, A. (1995) Choosing Your Coursebook, Oxford: Heinemann. Daoud, A.M. &Celce-Murcia, M. (1979). ‘Selecting and evaluating textbooks’. In CelceMurcia, M. & McIntosh, L. (Eds.) Teaching English as a second or foreign language. New York: Newbury House. Dougill, J. (1987) ‘Not so obvious’ in Sheldon, L.E. (Ed.) ELT Textbooks and Materials: Problems in Evaluation and Development, ELT Document 126, London: Modern English Publications/The British Council. Edge, J. and S. Wharton (1998). ‘Autonomy and development: living in the materials world’. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.) Materials Development in Language Teaching. New York: CambridgeUniversity Press: 295-310. Ellis, R. (1995) ‘Does it 'work'? Evaluating tasks’.MATSDA Folio 2.1: 19-21 Ellis, R. (1997) ‘The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials’, ELT Journal 51/1: 36-42, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ellis, R. (1998). ‘The evaluation of communicative tasks’.In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gearing, K. (1999).‘Helping less-experienced teachers of English to evaluate teachers' guides’.ELT Journal, 53, 122-127. Hemsley, M. (1997).‘The evaluation of teachers' guides design and application’.ELTED, 3/1. Harmer, J. (1991) The Practice of English Language Teaching. Harlow: Longman. Hutchinson, T. (1987) ‘What’s underneath? An interactive view of materials evaluation’ in Sheldon, L. E. (ed.). ELT Textbooks and Materials: Problems in Evaluation and Development, ELT Document 126, London: Modern English Publications/The British Council. House, S. and Scott, K. (2009) Learning Ladder 3, Teacher’s Guide. Istanbul: SELT Publishing Littlejohn, A. (1998) ‘The analysis of language teaching materials: inside the Trojan horse’. In B. Tomlinson (ed.), Materials Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.190-216. McDonough, J. And C. Shaw (1993) Materials and Methods in ELT: A Teacher’s Guide. London: Blackwell. McDonough, J. (1998) ‘Survey review: recent materials for the teaching of ESP’, ELT Journal 52/5. McGrath, I. (2002) Materials Evaluation and Design for Language Teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Nunan, D. (1991). Language Teaching Methodology. New York: Prentice Hall. Richards, J.C. (1993) ‘The role of commercial materials in language teaching’, RELC Journal 24:1-14. Richards J.C. 2001. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge. Shannon, P. (1987). Commercial reading materials, a technological ideology, and the deskilling of teachers.The Elementary School Journal, 87, 3, 307-329. Sheldon, L.E. (Ed.) (1987) ELT Textbooks and Materials: Problems in Evaluation and Development, ELT Document 126, London: Modern English Publications/The British Council. -148- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 141-164, 1 April, 2015 Sheldon, L.E. (1988) ‘Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials’ ELT Journal 42/4, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Skierso, A. (1991) ‘Textbook selection and evaluation’ in Celce-Murcia (ed.) Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston: Heinle&Heinle. Tomlinson, B. (ed.) (1998) Materials Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tomlinson, B. (1999) ‘Developing criteria for evaluating L2 materials’.IATEFL Issues, Vol. 153 10-13. Tomlinson, B. (2003) Developing Materials for Language Teaching. London: Continuum. Tucker, A. 1975.‘Evaluating Beginning Textbooks’.English Teaching Forum 13: 355-61. Williams, D. (1983) ‘Developing criteria for textbook evaluation’, ELT Journal 37/3, Oxford: Oxford University Press. -149- Evaluating the Teacher’s Guides of a Recently Published Course Book Series…S. O. Gok APPENDIX-A TEACHER’S GUIDE ANALYSIS CHECKLIST NO GENERAL FEATURES Are the rationale of the course book and views of the writers explicit 1 (text’s objective, methodology etc.? [1],[2] Does the TG guide the teacher to any set syllabus for that level? [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Does the TG guide the teachers to the contents, location of the new vocabulary, structures, and topics found in the text via indexes? [1] Does the TG provide correct or suggested answers for the exercises or tasks in the student’s text? [1] Does the TG provide information for the new and non-native Englishspeaking teachers? [1] Does the TG provide detailed information on language and methods? [2] Is the advice given on teaching procedures explicit? [2] Is there cultural information to enable teachers to interpret appropriately the situations represented in the teaching material? [2] THE NATURE OF LANGUAGE AND OF THE NATURE OF THE LANGUAGELEARNING PROCESS Which aspects of language are covered in the TG? [2] a. Form: ∎ grammar ∎ vocabulary ∎ pronunciation b. Use : □ skills 9 YES NO x x x x x x x x ∎appropriateness (style, etc.), □ pragmatics (i.e. how utterances acquire meaning in specific situations) 10 11 12 13 14 15 Is there reference to different learning styles and strategies, and are there suggestions for using and developing them? [2] Is the role of the teacher considered, possibly with reference to changing roles according to the nature of the learning activity? [2] TEACHER DEVELOPMENT Does the TG assume a teacher-development rule, by providing a rationale for the information and guidance it provides? [2] Does the TG help users to gain more understanding of the languageteaching principles involved, in addition to helping them to develop their practical teaching skills? [2] Does the TG give information on how people learn languages? [3] -150- Does the TG help teachers to understand why it uses certain activities and methods? [3] x x x x x x Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 141-164, 1 April, 2015 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Does the TG help teachers to become more confident about developing their teaching skills? LANGUAGE ITEMS TO BE TAUGHT Are there any information given about the language items to be taught and how to handle them? [2] Are learning difficulties predicted and appropriate advice given? [4] Are there any helpful notes about possible problems? [2] Does the TG offer a variety of techniques for teaching structural units in meaningful situations (in context)? [1] CULTURAL LOADING Does the TG adequately predict difficulties in understanding the cultural setting or background? [2] Does the TG deal with cultural understanding difficulties by providing sufficient information and explanation? [2] Does the TG provide guidance for the teacher in the presentation of figurative language, idiomatic expressions, and words and expressions similar to ones in his/her native language? [1] PROCEDURAL GUIDANCE Does TG provide guidance in selecting and sequencing units, planning them into a scheme of work, and thereby integrating them into the overall learning programme? [2] Does the TG suggest procedures for the planning, preparation and conduct of lessons? ADVICE ABOUT THE UNPREDICTABLE Does the TG assist the teacher in dealing with the unpredictable, for example in selecting optional routes through the lesson, or in handling activities that do not go according to plan? [2] CORRECTION Is the teacher advised when and how to correct students' language? [2] Does the TG contain suggestions for ways students might respond to correction? [2] MOTIVATION Does the TG make a positive contribution to heightening and sustaining learner motivation? [2] PRESENTATION AND USE Does the TG suggest how it can best be used? [2] Do the organization and layout of the contents make the TG easy to use? [2] Is there advice about how to supplement the course book, or to present the lessons in different ways? [5] LANGUAGE OF THE TEACHER’S GUIDE If the TG is in English, is the style direct and comprehensible to non-native speakers? [2] Is the language in the teachers’ guide easy to understand? Is the TG free of the use of confusing met language? [2] -151- x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Evaluating the Teacher’s Guides of a Recently Published Course Book Series…S. O. Gok 34 35 36 37 38 LESSON PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION Does the TG provide a plan for every lesson? [3] Are the objectives of each lesson clear? [3] Are the instructions for each lesson plan clear? [3] Does the TG suggest alternative activities or plans? [3] Does the TG suggest ways to explain difficult parts? [3] 40 Does the TG give ideas for classroom management? [3] 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 x x x x x x Does the TG tell the teacher which parts students may find difficult? [3] 39 41 x x x Does the TG provide lesson summaries and suggestions to help the teacher review old lessons and introduce new lessons? [1] Does the TG advise about how to present the lesson in different ways (Flexibility)? [1] EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT Is the teacher encouraged to evaluate each lesson, and if so are there any suggestions how this might be done? [2] Are there guidelines for evaluating how well lessons went? [4] Are there regular progress tests? [4] Is there adequate guidance in the checking of learning both informally, through practice activities, and more formally, through revision units and achievement tests? [2] COMPONENTS, SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS AND TEACHER AIDS Are there any photocopiable additional materials? [4] Does the TG help the teacher with the use of the technological components, such as DVD, IWB applications? Does the TG advise the teacher on the use of audio-visual aids, and suggest creative substitutions for situations where audio-visual equipment is unavailable? [1] Does the TG provide teacher’s aids such as tape scripts and suggestions for their effective use, technical notes, vocabulary lists, and structural functional inventories? [1] TEACHING PRONUNCIATION AND SOUND SYSTEM Does the TG provide practical suggestions for teaching pronunciation and intonation? [1] Does TG provide guidance on the distinctions between British and American English with regard to pronunciation, vocabulary, and grammatical structures? [1] Does the TG provide guidance to the teacher in presenting punctuation and how changes in stress and intonation may alter meanings? [1] -152- x x x x x x x x x x Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 141-164, 1 April, 2015 53 54 55 Does the TG present a contrastive analysis of sound system and word usage of English and the native language? [1] CONTEXT FLEXIBILITY Does the TG conform to the methodological requirements determined to be suitable by the administrators or the teachers themselves; and, if not, can the material be exploited or modified as required by local circumstances? [1] Is the TG meaningful and helpful to the teacher without being too confining? Is it eclectic in approach? (Flexibility in approach) [1] TOTAL (except question 9) 1. Skierso, 1991; 2. Cunningsworth&Kusel , 1991; 3. Gearing, 1999; 4. Coleman, 1985; 5. Sheldon, 1988. -153- x x x 30 24 Evaluating the Teacher’s Guides of a Recently Published Course Book Series…S. O. Gok APPENDIX-B POINTS: 0 = NOT IN THE BOOK 1 = STRONGLY DISAGREE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR TEACHERS’ GUIDES 2 = DISAGREE 3 = NOT SURE/NO IDEA 4 = AGREE 5 = STRONGLY AGREE 1 2 GENERAL FEATURES The rationale of the course book and views of the writers are explicit (text’s objective, methodology etc.). The TG guides the teacher to any set syllabus for that level. 3 The TG guides the teachers to the contents, location of the new vocabulary, structures, and topics found in the text via indexes. 4 The TG provides correct or suggested answers for the exercises or tasks in the student’s text. 5 The TG provides information for the new and nonnative English-speaking teachers. 6 The TG provides detailed information on language and methods. 7 The advice given on teaching procedures is explicit. 8 There is cultural information to enable teachers to interpret appropriately the situations represented in the teaching material. THE NATURE OF LANGUAGE AND OF THE NATURE OF THE LANGUAGE-LEARNING PROCESS Which aspects of language are covered in the TG? (TICK AS NECESSARY) a. Form: 9 b. Use : □ grammar □vocabulary □ pronunciation □ skills □ appropriateness (style, etc.), □ pragmatics (i.e. how utterances acquire meaning in specific situations) -154- POINT COMMENTS Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 141-164, 1 April, 2015 10 There is reference to different learning styles and strategies, and there are suggestions for using and developing them. 11 The role of the teacher is considered, possibly with reference to changing roles according to the nature of the learning activity. 12 13 14 15 16 TEACHER DEVELOPMENT The TG assumes a teacher-development rule, by providing a rationale for the information and guidance it provides. TG helps users to gain more understanding of the language-teaching principles involved, in addition to helping them to develop their practical teaching skills. The TG gives information on how people learn languages. The TG helps teachers to understand why it uses certain activities and methods. The TG helps teachers to become more confident about developing their teaching skills. LANGUAGE ITEMS TO BE TAUGHT There is information given about the language 17 items to be taught and how to handle them. Learning difficulties are predicted and appropriate 18 advice given. There are helpful notes about possible problems. The TG offers a variety of techniques for teaching 19 structural units in meaningful situations. CULTURAL LOADING The TG adequately predicts difficulties in understanding the cultural setting or background. The TG deals with cultural understanding 21 difficulties by providing sufficient information and explanation. The TG provides guidance for the teacher in the presentation of figurative language, idiomatic 22 expressions, and words and expressions similar to ones in his/her native language. PROCEDURAL GUIDANCE The TG provides guidance in selecting and sequencing units, planning them into a scheme of 23 work, and thereby integrating them into the overall learning programme. The TG suggests procedures for the planning, 24 preparation and conduct of lessons. 20 -155- Evaluating the Teacher’s Guides of a Recently Published Course Book Series…S. O. Gok 25 ADVICE ABOUT THE UNPREDICTABLE The TG assists the teacher in dealing with the unpredictable, for example in selecting optional routes through the lesson, or in handling activities that do not go according to plan? CORRECTION 26 The teacher is advised when and how to correct students' language. 27 The TG contains suggestions for ways students might respond to correction. MOTIVATION 28 The TG makes a positive contribution to heightening and sustaining learner motivation. PRESENTATION AND USE 29 The TG suggests how it can best be used. The organization and layout of the contents make 30 the TG easy to use. 31 There is advice about how to supplement the course book, or to present the lessons in different ways. LANGUAGE OF THE TG 32 The TG’s language style is direct and comprehensible to non-native speakers. 34 35 36 The TG’s language is easy to understand? The TG is free of the use of confusing metalanguage? LESSON PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION The TG provides a plan for every lesson? The objectives of each lesson are clear. The instructions for each lesson plan are clear. 37 The TG suggests alternative activities or plans. 38 The TG tells the teacher which parts students may find difficult. 39 The TG suggests ways to explain difficult parts. 40 The TG gives ideas for classroom management. 33 41 42 The TG provides lesson summaries and suggestions to help the teacher review old lessons and introduce new lessons. The TG advises about how to present the lesson in different ways (Flexibility). -156- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 141-164, 1 April, 2015 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 LESSON EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT The teacher is encouraged to evaluate each lesson, and there are suggestions how this might be done. There are guidelines for evaluating how well lessons went. There are regular progress tests. There is adequate guidance in the checking of learning both informally, through practice activities, and more formally, through revision units and achievement tests. COMPONENTS, SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS AND TEACHER AIDS There are photocopiable additional materials. The TG helps the teacher with the use of the technological components, such as interactive DVDs, videos, Interactive Whiteboard (IWB) applications. The TG advises the teacher on the use of audiovisual aids, and suggests creative substitutions for situations where audio-visual equipment is unavailable. The TG provides teacher’s aids such as tape scripts and suggestions for their effective use, technical notes, vocabulary lists, and structural functional inventories. TEACHING PRONUNCIATION AND SOUND SYSTEM The TG provides practical suggestions for teaching pronunciation and intonation. The TG provides guidance on the distinctions between British and American English with regard to pronunciation, vocabulary, and grammatical structures. The TG provides guidance to the teacher in presenting punctuation and how changes in stress and intonation may alter meanings. The TG presents a contrastive analysis of sound system and word usage of English and the native language. CONTEXT FLEXIBILITY The TG conforms to the methodological requirements determined to be suitable by the administrators or the teachers themselves; and, if not, the material can be exploited or modified as required by local circumstances. -157- Evaluating the Teacher’s Guides of a Recently Published Course Book Series…S. O. Gok 55 The TG is meaningful and helpful to the teacher without being too confining. It is eclectic in approach? (Flexibility in approach) -158- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 141-164, 1 April, 2015 APPENDIX-C QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS NUMBER OF THE PEOPLE Q NO NO T IN THE BO O K NO T STRO NGLY DISAGREE SURE/NO DISAGREE IDEA 1 X X 1 2 X X 3 X 4 AGREE STRO NGLY AGREE 2 10 31 X 6 15 23 X X X 18 26 32 9 3 X X X 5 11 5 4 24 X X 6 38 4 X 2 X X 7 X X X 8 15 21 8 3 X 6 7 15 13 9 GRA:41 VOC:42 PRO: 33 SKILLS: 3 APP:32 PRAG: X 10 5 X 1 15 21 2 11 23 2 1 14 3 1 12 11 1 3 22 5 2 13 X X X 2 11 31 14 9 7 7 4 12 5 15 X X X 4 5 35 16 X 1 6 5 21 11 17 32 8 2 2 X X 18 13 8 17 6 X X 19 1 X 1 2 16 24 20 7 1 5 10 12 9 21 1 4 6 5 19 9 22 8 7 11 10 5 3 23 2 X 1 7 12 22 24 1 1 2 4 19 17 25 13 10 12 7 1 X 26 27 9 5 3 X X 27 31 7 5 1 X X 28 X 6 9 X 16 13 29 6 1 3 2 20 12 30 X 2 7 3 15 17 31 14 15 9 3 1 2 32 X X 2 1 12 29 33 1 X 2 2 8 31 34 X X X X 11 33 35 X X X 2 3 39 -159- Evaluating the Teacher’s Guides of a Recently Published Course Book Series…S. O. Gok 36 X X 1 3 8 32 37 16 19 7 2 X X 38 9 13 15 4 2 1 39 17 12 10 3 1 1 40 23 10 9 2 X X 41 31 9 3 1 X X 42 19 18 7 X X X 43 15 13 8 4 2 2 44 13 X 3 x 15 13 45 7 5 11 3 13 5 46 19 X 5 X 11 9 47 27 8 5 X 3 1 48 25 5 9 3 1 1 49 23 7 10 4 X X 50 9 3 8 12 7 5 51 35 5 4 X X X 52 31 9 2 2 X X 53 26 12 5 1 X X 54 3 8 9 11 9 4 55 6 8 11 8 6 5 APPENDIX-D (From LL-3 TG, p. 37) -160- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 141-164, 1 April, 2015 APPENDIX-E (From LL-3 TG, p. 39) -161- Evaluating the Teacher’s Guides of a Recently Published Course Book Series…S. O. Gok APPENDIX-F (From LL-3 TG, p. 71) -162- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 141-164, 1 April, 2015 APPENDIX-G (From LL-3 TG, p. 66) -163- Evaluating the Teacher’s Guides of a Recently Published Course Book Series…S. O. Gok APPENDIX-H (From LL-3 TG, p. 64) -164- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE) Vol. 5(1), pp. 165-172, 1 April, 2015 Available online at http://mije.mevlana.edu.tr/ http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.12.5.1 Short Turkish Version of Proactive Scale: A Study of Validity and Reliability Ahmet Akın Counseling and Psychology Department, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey Neslihan Arıcı Özcan Psychology Department, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey Article history Proactivity is the most popular concept of positive psychology Received: in industrial and psychological area. Thus the aim of this 24.01.2014 research is to adapt the Short Version of Proactive Personality Received in revised form: Scale with 10–item (Claes, Beheydt, & Lemmens, 2005) into 05.04.2015 Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties. The research was conducted on 332 university students. Results of Accepted: 06.04.2015 language equivalency showed that the correlations between Turkish and English forms were ranged from .74 to .90. The Key words: corrected item-total correlations ranged from .52 to .66. Proactive personality, Results of confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the reliability, validity ten items loaded on one factor and the uni-dimensional model was well fit (x2= 47.91, df= 29, x2/df= 1,65, RMSEA= .044, NFI= .99, CFI= .99, IFI= .99, RFI= .97, GFI= .97, AGFI= .95, SRMR= .033). The internal consistency reliability coefficient of the scale was found as .86. Thus this scale is a valid and reliable instrument. Introduction In today’s world rapidly improvements in technology, increasing ambiguity, confusions, and dynamism lead many organizations to prefer a person with having long and permanent goals (Crant, 2000; Friedman, 2005; Grant & Ashford, 2008). In parallel to these changes many employers in industry and researchers recently have focused on proactivity concept (Campbell, 2000; Van Dyne, Ang, & Botero, 2003). Moreover proactive personality is seen as necessary characteristic rather than luxury in today’s changing and competitive world (Prabhu, 2007). In literature the concept of proactive personality is mentioned in many theories. Existential theorist Bonner (1967) has defined proactivity as the interactions with the environment that an individual uses his/her potentials and creativity, gives importance on future orientation, makes choices and takes his/her responsibilities. And also Bonner (1967) has suggested that proactive personality characteristics reduces the uncertainty and possibilities by planned efforts, bold fantasy, and moral courage. In terms of the choice theory it is indicated that a person provides his/her 5 basic needs (survival, love, belongings, power and freedom) with aakin@sakarya.edu.tr neslihanozcan@medipol.edu.tr Short Turkish Version of Proactive Scale…A. Akın & N. Arıcı Özcan choosing behaviors in freedom ways and following 10 axioms (Glasser, 1988). The examples of 10 axioms are stated that a person is only creature to control his/her, the problematic relationship is a part of his/her life, a person only gives another person information. The proactive personality characteristics are emphasized in all these axioms (Glasser, 1988). In parallel with two mentioned theories, the interdependence theory explains that people have two areas such as interest areas (humans, animals, hobbies) and effect areas. Effect areas that control the interest areas enable people to show their proactive personality (Covey, 1998). In all these above mentioned theories proactive personality is not operationally defined. Positive psychology focuses on modern life opportunities for individuals, and well being of individuals rather than individuals’ failure, pathologies, burnouts and helplessness behaviors (Caprara & Cervone, 2003). Positive psychology researchers examine procedures and conditions that contribute the functions and improvements of individuals and organizations (Gable & Haidt, 2005). Thus positive psychology proposes the proactive personality characteristic such as being responsible, hopeful, brave, perseverance and having work ethic (Crant, 2000). Proactivity has been generally defined as one being relatively unconstrained by situational forces and changes the environment intentionally and directly (Bateman & Crant, 1993; Grant & Ashford, 2008; Griffin, Neal, & Parker, 2007). Proactivity includes proactive personality and proactive behaviors. Individuals with proactive personality are entrepreneurs, responsible, determined, make risk analysis, and take appropriate risk (Bateman & Crant, 1993; Grant & Ashford, 2008). Proactive behaviors contain intentional decisions, (Morrison & Phelps, 1999) and taking risk rather than accepting the conditions (Crant, 2000; Crant & Bateman 2000). As it is stated, proactive personality and behaviors are permanent characteristic that affect situations and activities (Seibert, Crant, & Kraimer, 1999; Seibert, Kraimer, & Crant, 2001). Furthermore there is a positive relationship among extraneous, successfulness, leadership and proactivity (Bateman & Crant, 1993; Crant, 1996; Crant & Bateman, 2000). Henceforth many researchers in career (Claes & Ruiz-Quintanilla, 1998; Sturges, Conway, Guest, & Liefooghe, 2005; Sturges, Guest, Conway, & Davey, 2002) and in business context (Campbell, 2000; Van Dyne, et al., 2003; Parker, Williams, & Turner, 2006) examined proactive personality features. Some studies indicated that proactive personality is seen as a most crucial factor in career performance (Crant, 1995; Fuller, Hester, & Cox, 2010; Gerhardt, Ashenbaum, & Newman, 2003; Pitt, Ewing, & Berthonc, 2002; Thompson, 2005), in work adjustment (KammeyerMueller, & Wanberg, 2003), external and internal career success (Seibert et al., 1999; Seibert et al., 2001), transformational and charismatic leadership (Crant & Bateman, 2000),and successful job search (Brown, Cober, Kane, Levy, & Shalhoop, 2006). Moreover proactive personality encompasses not only an individual but also an organization achievement (Ashford & Black, 1996; Chan & Schmitt, 2000). With this regard, the person with proactive personality characteristic is beneficial in his/her organizations, cultures, community, and even global world (Covey, 1998). All perspectives mentioned above explained proactive personality features and proactive behaviors in terms of individual differences. On the other hand the influences of recent cognitive and social perspectives lead researchers to examine proactive personality characteristic with individual and environmental factors (work autonomy, trusting relationship among co-worker). In this regard, to elicit which factors or antecedents lead an individual to show proactive personality with proactive behaviors it is necessary to measure proactive personality. The first proactive scale was developed by Bateman and Crant (1993). -166- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 165-172, 1 April, 2015 The first original scale was 17 –item with 7 Likert type (1: definitely disagree, 7: definitely agree) and had one factor. The high score of the scale means that an individual has high level of proactive features. The internal consistency of the scale was found as between .87 and .89 but construct validity of the scale was not examined (Bateman & Crant, 1993). Moreover abbreviated forms of the PPS with 10 -tem (Claes, 2002; Kammeyer-Mueller &Wanberg, 2003; Seibert et al., 1999, 2001); 6 -item, ( Parker, 1998), 5- item ( Kickul & Grundy, 2002) and 4-item (Parker & Spring, 1998 ) were developed and especially 10 item version was found the highest average factor loading in the original PPS as provided by Bateman and Crant (1993). But all abbreviated forms were not tested beyond American and British culture. Henceforth Claes and his colleagues (2005) used short version forms (10 -item, 6 -item, 5 item and 4 –item) and applied 3 different countries (Belgium, N=882, Finland, N=100, Spanish, N=100) to increase their validity and reliability on different culture. All three short forms were 7 Likert type and had one factor as similar to original form. The internal consistency of 10-item version (Belgium .83; Finland .79; Spanish .85) and 6 item version (Belgium .79; Finland .78; Spanish .86) were found reliable. As a result of the exploratory factor analysis, the amount of total variance of 10-item version form for Belgium sample explained 34.7 % (factor loadings ranged from .38 to .69); for Finland sample explained 30.2 % (factor loadings ranged from .32 to .76) and for Spain sample explained 41.2 % (factor loadings ranged from .24 to .84). The amount of total variance of 6 –item version form for Belgium sample explained 39% (factor loadings ranged from .52 to .71); for Finland sample explained 40.7 % (factor loadings ranged from .44 to .83) and for Spain sample explained 52.2 %, (factor loadings ranged from .54 to .84). Within this context the amount of total variance of 10-item version explained optimal level, the amount of total variance of 6-item version explained sufficiently. As the result of the validity and the reliability it was found that 10 item version and 6 –item version are reliable scales to use. Furthermore 10 item version scale was used in many career and job performance studies. Kim, Hon and Crant (2009) examined the relationship between proactive personality, employee creativity, and newcomer outcomes with 146 Chinese employee and found that employee creativity fully mediated the relationships between proactive personality and career satisfaction and perceived insider status. With parallel to this study Joo and Lim (2009) investigated the effect of personal characteristics (proactive personality) and contextual characteristics (organizational learning culture and job complexity) on employees’ intrinsic motivation and organizational commitment with 283 employees. And they found that employees were more intrinsically motivated when they showed higher proactive personality and perceived higher job complexity and proactive personality moderated the relationship between organizational learning culture and organizational commitment. Thompson (2005) examined the mediated model of the relationship between proactive personality and job performance with 126 employees and found that the relationship between proactive personality and job performance is mediated by network building and initiative taking on the part of the employee. With parallel to this research Fuller, Hoster and Cox (2010) found that proactive personality is positively correlated with job performance and job autonomy serves as a significant workplace constraint for people with proactive personalities. In Turkey there is not any study about the short version of Proactive Personality Scales with 6-item and 10item and it was decided to make study with 10-item. Therefore aim of this research is to adapt Short Version of Proactive Personality with 10- item into Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties. -167- Short Turkish Version of Proactive Scale…A. Akın & N. Arıcı Özcan Method Participants This study was executed 332 university students from different programs of Sakarya University Educational Faculty in Turkey. Of the participants, 150 were male (45.1%) and 182 were female (54.9%) and the mean age of the participants was 20.8 years. The participants’ age was ranged from 18 to 22 and the mean age of the participants was 20.8 year. Procedure Primarily Short Version of Proactive Personality Scale with 10-item was translated into Turkish by five academicians from English Language and Literature department. Before validity and reliability studies, to examine the language equivalency of the scale the correlations between Turkish and English forms were calculated. In this study exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to examine the factor structure of the scale according to the data obtained from the Turkish students and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was executed to confirm the original scale’s structure in Turkish culture. As reliability analysis; internal consistency coefficients and the item-total correlations were calculated. Data were analyzed using LISREL 8.54 and SPSS 11.5 package programs. Results Language Equivalency The results of language equivalency showed that the correlations between Turkish and English forms were ranged from .74 to .90. The correlations coefficient between items of Turkish and the original version were shown in Table 1. Table 1 The Correlation Coefficient between Items of Turkish and the Original Version of Primarily Short Version of Proactive Personality Scale Item No r Item No r 1 .74 6 .88 2 .80 7 .86 3 .80 8 .78 4 .86 9 .87 5 .79 10 .90 Item Analysis and Reliability To examine discrimination power of items item analysis was done. As a result of the item analysis the corrected item –total correlation coefficient ranged from .52 to .66. Cronbach alpha internal consistency reliability coefficient was found .86. The results were seen in Table 2. Table 2 Item Total Correlation Coefficient of Primarily Short Version of Proactive -168- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 165-172, 1 April, 2015 Item No rjx 1 2 3 4 5 .518 .587 .590 .497 .662 Personality Scale α (if item Item No deleted) .851 6 .846 7 .845 8 .853 9 .839 10 rjx .526 .527 .551 .641 .589 α (if item deleted) .851 .851 .849 .841 .846 Construct Validity Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of Primarily Short Version of Proactive Personality Scale was executed to confirm the original scale’s structure in Turkish culture As a result of DFA, the confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the model was well fit and Chi-Square value (x2= 47.91, N= 332, df= 29, x2/df= 1,65, p= 0.01502) which was calculated for the adaptation of the model was found to be significant. The goodness of fit index values of the model were RMSEA= .044, NFI= .99, CFI= .99, IFI= .99, RFI= .97, GFI= .97, AGFI= .95, SRMR= .033. Figure 1: Path Diagram for Short Version of Proactive Personality Scale -169- Short Turkish Version of Proactive Scale…A. Akın & N. Arıcı Özcan Discussion This study is aim to adapt to The Short Version of Proactive Personality with 10- item into Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties. The participant’s number is enough to examine validity and reliability of the test (Tabachnick & Fidell, 2007). The language equivalency of the correlations between Turkish and English forms were calculated and found high level consistency. This result showed that the translation of original form into Turkish was successful process. To examine the construct validity of the Short Version of Proactive Personality with 10- item CFA were done. The results of confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the 10-item loaded on one factor and the factor structure was well harmonized with the factor structure of the original scale. Similarly, confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the model was well fit and the structural model of Short Turkish Version of Proactive Personality Scale with 10-item which consists of one factor was well fit to the Turkish culture. The reliability coefficients were found high. This result indicated that the reliability level in terms of reference of .70 level (Sipahi, Yurtkoru, & Çinko, 2008). Itemtotal correlation coefficients satisfied .30 criteria. When taking the consideration of the 30 and above .30 criteria for item total correlation coefficients that are enough to differentiate individuals about measured features (Özdamar, 2004), item-total correlation coefficients of the Short Version of Proactive Personality with 10- item are high. Overall findings demonstrated that this scale had high validity and reliability scores and that it may be used as a valid and reliable instrument in order to assess proactive personality in career and job related studies. Last not but least with this scale may be used in any organization to assign the personnel to appropriate position. Conclusions According to the results of the study of validity and reliability of Short Turkish Version of Proactive with 10-item, this scale is used as a valid and reliable instrument in order to assess proactive personality. When the results of the scale are considered there are some suggestions. Primarily to designate the convergent validity of the Short Turkish Version of Proactive with 10-item the correlation between the Short Turkish Version of Proactive with 10-item and valid/ reliable scales might be examined. The participant of this study was university students. Also it is vital to the different samples might be taken for the validity and reliability of this scale. Furthermore to compare Short Turkish Version of Proactive with 10item with Short Turkish Version of Proactive with 6-item, the adaptation of Short Turkish Version of Proactive with 6-item might be taken. Last but not least, further studies which will use this scale will make significant contributions. References Ashford, S. J., & Black, J.S. (1996). Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of desire for control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 199-211. Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103-118. Bonner, H. (1967).The proactive personality. In J. F. T. Bugental (Ed.), Challenges of humanistic psychology (s. 61-66). New York: McGraw-Hill. Brown, D. J., Cober, R.T., Kane, K., Levy, P. E., & Shalhoop, J. (2006). Proactive personality and the successful job search: A field investigation with college graduates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 717-726. -170- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 165-172, 1 April, 2015 Buyukozturk, S. (2007). Handbook of data analysis for social sciences (8.Ed). Ankara: Pegem Press. Campbell, D. J. (2000). The proactive employee: Managing workplace initiative. Academy of Management Executive, 14, 52-66. Caprara, G. V., & Cervone, D. (2003). A conception of personality for a psychology of human strengths: Personality as an agentic, self regulating system, In L.G. Aspinwall & U.M. Staudinger, (Ed), A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology. (pp. 61-74). Washington: D.C: American Psychological Association. Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (2000). Inter-individual differences in intra-individual changes in proactivity during organizational entry: A latent growth modelling approach to understanding newcomer adaptation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 190-210. Claes, R., & Ruiz-Quintanilla, S.A. (1998). Influences of early career experiences, occupational group, and national culture on proactive Career Behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52(3), 357-378. Claes, R., Beheydt, C., & Lemmens, B. (2005). Uni-dimensionality of abbreviated Proactive Personality Scales across cultures. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(4), 476-489. Covey, S. (1998). The 7 habits of highly effective teens: The ultimate teenage success guide. New York: Simon & Schuster. Crant, J. M. (1995). The proactive personality scale and objective job performance among real estate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 532-537. Crant, J. M. (1996). The proactive personality scale as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 34(3), 42-49. Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organization. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435462. Crant, J. M., & Bateman, T. S. (2000). Charismatic leadership viewed from above: The impact of proactive personality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 63-75. Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Picador. Fuller, J. B., Hester, K., & Cox, S. (2010). Proactive personality and job performance: Exploring job autonomy as a moderator. Journal of Managerial Issues, 22(1), 35-51. Gable, S., & Haidt, J. (2005). What (and why) is positive psychology? Review of General Psychology, 9, 103-110. Gerhardt, M., Ashenbaum, B., & Newman, W.R. (2003). Understanding the impact of proactive personality on job performance. The roles of tenure and self-management. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 16(1), 61-72. Glasser, W. (1998). Choice theory. New York: Harper Collins. Grant, A., & Ashford, S.J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. In B. M. Staw & R. I. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 28, pp. 3-3-i). London: Jai Press. Griffin, M.A., Neal, A., & Parker, S.K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 327-347. Joo, B-K., & Lim, T. (2009). The effects of organizational learning culture, perceived job complexity, and proactive personality on organizational commitment and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 16(1), 48-60. Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Wanberg, C. R. (2003). Unwrapping the organizational entry process: disentangling multiple antecedents and their pathways to adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 779-784. -171- Short Turkish Version of Proactive Scale…A. Akın & N. Arıcı Özcan Kim, T-Y., Hon, A. H. Y., & Crant, E. J. M. (2009). Proactive personality, employee creativity, and newcomer outcomes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business Psychology, 24, 93-103. Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extra-role efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 403-419. Özdamar, K. (2004). Statistical data analysis with package 1. Eskisehir: Kaan Bookstore. Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modelling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 636-652. Pitt, L. F., Ewing, M. T., & Berthonc, P. R. (2002). Proactive behavior and industrial sales force performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 639- 644. Prabhu, V. P. (2007). Understanding the effect of proactive personality on job the effect of proactive personality on job related outcomes in organizational change setting. Published Doctoral Thesis, Auburn. Seibert, S. E., Crant, M., & Kraimer, M.L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 416-427. Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, M. (2001). What does proactive personality do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personal Psychology, 54, 845-874. Sipahi, B., Yurtkoru, E.S., & Çinko, M. (2008). Data analysis in social sciences with SPSS. İstanbul: Beta Press and Delivery Sturges, J., Conway, N., Guest, D., & Liefooghe, A. (2005). Managing the career deal: The psychological contract as a framework for understanding career management, organizational commitment and work behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 821-838. Sturges, J., Guest, D., Conway, N., & Davey, K. M. (2002). A longitudinal study of the relationship between career management and organizational commitment among graduates in the first ten years at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 731748. Thompson, J. A. (2005). Proactive personality and job performance: A social capital perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1011-1017. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., & Botero, I.C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1359-1392. -172- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE) Vol. 5(1), pp. 173-180, 1 April, 2015 Available online at http://mije.mevlana.edu.tr/ http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.14.77.5.1 A Brief Review of Literature on Using Technology to Help Language Learners to Improve Their Language Skills Eyup Bayram Guzel Institute of Education, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK People have been fairly interested in what technology offers to them around a scope of human necessities and it has become a part of human life. In this study, experimental studies were Received in revised form: reviewed for the purpose of how technology helps language 06.04.2015 learners improve their phonemic awareness, reading comprehension and vocabulary development skills. As a Accepted: 07.04.2015 conclusion, experimental studies demonstrated that students showed significant improvements up to 70% in phonological Key words: awareness, while they demonstrated up to 76% of technology, phonemic improvements in reading comprehension and up to 77% in awareness, reading comprehension, vocabulary vocabulary development. The use of computer-assisted development technologies and its positive outcomes were encouraged to be used more widely in order to meet the diverse needs of students. Article history Received: 04.07.2014 Introduction Over the last few decades, technology has become a part of human life. People have been fairly interested in what technology offers to them around a scope of human necessities .In order to meet these necessities and the challenges of fast-paced globalization and a more demanding high-tech environment of the future, it is necessary to educate and equip students with relevant abilities, especially in the process of improving communication skills and in literacy. Also, Ming-Mu (2008) states that it is important to assist them to advance authentic technology attitude and belief. In education, the technology is being used by many students, schools, colleges, and universities, and a lot of money has been spent for integrating the latest technological advancements into their subject areas (Calderon &Young, 1999). The language learning process is a long road and requires a great deal of language support and study. Therefore, in this strained process, several difficulties might occur such as phonemic awareness issues, reading, writing, comprehension, vocabulary development, listening, and speaking. Studies have consistently found that one of the biggest issues in language learning process stems from the issue of educating students with high phonemic awareness (Bryant & Hoswami, 1990, Leong, Tan, 2005). Another important difficulty of learning language is reading comprehension development. Burgoyne & Kelly (2009) stated that the absence of identifying comprehension difficulties and providing appropriate support for the development of comprehension will lead to reduced access to the curriculum and an inability to reach the individual’s full potential. The difficulties of learning language have crucial and chaining effects on each other in terms of academic, quality of life, and functional performance. For example, a large body of research identifies phonological awareness as critical for the Eyupbguzel@gmail.com A Brief Review of Literature on Using Technology to Help Language Learners…E. B. Guzel development of word reading skills (e.g. Bryant, Maclean, Bradley, & Crosslands, 1990). Also, Hatcher and And (1994) documented the efficacy of phonics teaching in boosting reading skills. The primary purpose of reading is defined as to understand the text you read (Nation & Angell, 2006). Therefore, successful reading requires the development of comprehension skills and word reading (Oakhill, Cain, &Bryant, 2003). In this chain of phonemic awareness, reading and understanding (comprehension), if there is an absence of any of these components, the development of academic performance will be affected negatively and students might fail in order to reach their full potential. The difficulties would lead the teachers and researchers in the way of training themselves better. And, by doing so, as Calderon-Young (1999) assume, instructors will be able to implement new programs to boost the learning process in obtaining language. Calderon-Young, 1999 describes that “the presence of technological advances indicates that educators are interested in the benefit gained from the technology such as computers, LAN’s, CD-ROM’s, scanners, file servers, laserdiscs, computer peripherals, instructor-designed multimedia programs such as language tools, multimedia toolbooks, hypercard, and software program”. The development process of technology is quicker than our educational institutions and Norman (1993) states that the critical issue to address is seeking the right path for the purpose of incorporating concern for learning into the functional specifications of the new devices. In order to integrate new technology into English language classes, according to Calderon and Young (1999), one of the most used technological items for educators has been the use of computers for practice, and some of software packages today contain problem solving and simulations, practice and drill, trivia games, videotape lessons, computer-assisted books and digitized images of foreign cities and countries accompanied by text in the target language. The three important components of English are studied in this article. The first one is phonemic awareness, which is described as an important metalinguistic skill which can let students more effectively acquire reading and spelling abilities (Mehta, Foorman, Branum, & Taylor, 2005). Rayner at al. (2001) describes reading comprehension as the level of understanding of books. The third one is vocabulary development, which is a set of words that the basic building blocks used in the generation and understanding of sentences (Miller, 1991). The purpose of this study is to provide a brief literature review on the benefits of using technology to help language learners to improve their phonemic awareness, reading comprehension and vocabulary skills. Implications and suggestions for future research will be provided. Review of Selected Literature Using technology to help language learners can be an important way in order to create independent and collaborative learning environments and also help students with language experiences as they move through the various stages of language acquisition (Rost, 2002). In this language acquisition process, there are several ways in which technology can be used by researchers. In this section, nine articles were reviewed for the purpose of using technology to help language learners improve their phonemic awareness, reading comprehension and vocabulary development skills. Phonemic Awareness The use of technology can be a very beneficial material in order to teach phonemic awareness in the process of language acquisition. Carreker (2005) emphasizes that phonemic awareness training is a helpful way to rectify the problems of poor spelling at any age while Treiman & Baron (1983) reports learners with high capability of phonemic awareness, perform better competences in pronunciation-recognition, spelling, and reading. For example -174- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 173-180, 1 April, 2015 a number of research studies have shown the positive effects of using technology to help language learners containing ICT effectiveness (Felix, 2005), CALL (computer assisted language learning) as an academic research (Hubbard, 2005), developments in technology (Zhao, 2003). In one study, Lai and Tsai (2009) studied with 120 third-graders, aged 9-10 years, from an elementary school in Yunlin County in Taiwan for the purpose of improving their English phonetic awareness by using multimedia English learning (MEL) system which is based on Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) to enhance their language skills. MEL system is designed for analyzing phonetic structures, identifying and capturing pronunciation errors. Then, the educators could provide appropriate advice in pronunciation, rhythm, volume and intonation based on students’ needs. The researchers randomly assigned the students to a control and experimental group. The experimental group was taught by the MEL system while the control group was given conventional English teaching. The phonemic awareness test and the English achievement test were used for collecting data. The results demonstrated that the experimental group who had low phonemic awareness displayed significantly better scores than the control group in the English academic test. In another study using technology to teach phonemic awareness, Flexer et al. 2002, conducted a study with 53 regular education students, 34 girls and 19 boys, from three city pre-school classrooms. The main purpose of this study was enhancing phonemic awareness of pre-school students by using sound field amplifications in classrooms. The Yopp-Singer test was conducted for all students to pretest measure. The Yopp-Singer test is a test phonemic segmentation that measures a child’s ability to separately articulate the sounds of a spoken word in order and includes 22 items (Flexer at al., 2002). Then, the same test was administered at the end of first semester as a post-test measure. The researchers categorized students into three groups, group A, B and C and each group received different early phonological and phonemic awareness interventions. In group A, students were in the control group and given standard district pre-school and kindergarten curriculum. In group B (phonological awareness group) students received direct phonological awareness instruction 15 minutes every week four times starting the second semester of their pre-school year and continuing to the end of their first semester of their kindergarten year. Finally in group C, (phonological awareness group), students received the same instruction that group B students had and additionally received classroom sound-field system daily where the teachers wore wireless microphone transmitters, and their speech was transmitted by using light waves to an amplifier connected by wires to four loudspeakers to create a clear sound in the classroom. As a result, both groups B and C showed significantly higher scores than the control group (group A) on the posttest. Also, differences between group B and group C were not statistically different than each other because of the small group size of students, however, group C students received extra sound-field instruction than group B student, 78% of students scored above the mean for the test, while 57% percent of group B students scored above the mean. The results suggested that phonological and phonemic awareness training was more effective when sound field amplifications were used. Finally, Chera and Wood (2003) studied the effectiveness of using computer-based reading materials to improve phonological awareness skills of young children who were beginning to read. Seventy-five students ranging from 3-6 years old were enrolled in this study and 15 students were put in a control group. Sixty students were given an access to the computer software program while the control group was not. This software included six animated multimedia talking books taken from UK (United Kingdom) phonic reading scheme Bangers and Mash. Pre-test and post-test were administered and the results were assessed according to -175- A Brief Review of Literature on Using Technology to Help Language Learners…E. B. Guzel British ability scales word reading test (Elliot, 1983), Auditory onset awareness (Wilson, 1993) and Verbal onset awareness (Wilson, 1993). As a result, student in the intervention group demonstrated significantly higher scores in phonological awareness (70%) than the control group (45%) did between pre-test and post-test scores. Reading Comprehension Reading comprehension has of crucial importance in the academic learning of all subject areas, and is essential to professional success and to lifelong learning (Pritchard et al., 1999). Furthermore, Durkin (1993) describes reading comprehension as “essence of reading”. In this crucial learning process, use of technology might be useful in expanding the opportunities for students in engaging in reading of text (Meyer & Rose, 1998). In a study done by Lange at al., (1999) enhancing reading strategies through the use of technology in order to improve reading comprehension was studied. Seven hundred fourth grade students (group A) and 457 seventh grade students (group B) participated in this study. The researchers were evidenced declining of reading scores of students in data gathered by Illinois State University, Illinois State Board of Education and teacher observational checklists. The intervention used in this article were the incorporation of appropriate software programs including power point presentations, the software Inspiration for outlining content from reading subject areas, software on CD-ROM’s were Reading Blaster, Critical Concepts and Decisions- The Environment for enhancing reading for meaning, finding details and comprehension and Venn diagrams for visualizing comprehensions of two or more concepts. The researchers conducted pre and post-standardized tests (the school district’s criterion test) to both group. As a result, group A students showed 11% in overall reading comprehension skills and group B displayed 40% increase in reading comprehension. The researchers concluded that the use of technological tools improved students’ reading comprehension and also provided skills to transfer these developments to other areas of their studies. In another study, Ray and Belden (2007) evaluated strategies provided by an artificially intelligent adaptive tutoring and testing software system designed to teach reading comprehension skills to college students. Twenty-four college students enrolled in this study and they were evaluated according to pre and post-test which were specially constructed SAT/GRE type reading comprehension tests. Two equivalent forms (A and B) of reading comprehension tests were implemented for the purpose of exposing students to different content on pretest and posttests. The software system called MediaMatrix offers internet delivery of relatively traditional textbook content using highly individualized and adaptive tutorial and assessment procedures (Ray & Belden, 2007) were used including video based lectures with pauses to highlight via lecture, commentaries and question/answers, online textbook reading. Also, the use of settings, and other relevant variables was designated by an A/N process developed to parallel the process implemented within MediaMatrix for improving reading text comprehension (Ray, 2000). As a result of this study, a statistically significant (17%) gain between pre-to-post reading comprehension scores was found and the importance of using MediaMatrix strategies for shaping and improving students reading comprehension skills discussed by the researchers. In Vince Gaudio’s study (in 2003), an intensive vocabulary- building program for improving reading skills of ESL (English as a second language) students was implemented. Nineteen ESL students ranging from 7-10 years old in Illinois were enrolled for this study. The poor reading ability of students were documented by using the Star Computer Adaptive Reading Test. The vocabulary-building program used during the intervention included computerized -176- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 173-180, 1 April, 2015 vocabulary programs (95 vocabulary words recorded on CD accompanied with photos, mini picture dictionaries), vocabulary software (Rosetta Stone), and vocabulary based games (modern curriculum press picture vocabulary cards). For analyzing results, pretest and posttest measures were used based on the Star Computer Adaptive Reading Test, which was conducted during the first week (pre) and at the last (post) week of this study. As a conclusion, 76% of students demonstrated an increase in their reading abilities and the greatest improvement was from those who scored lowest on the pretest. Vocabulary Development According to Pearson et al., 2007, we can decrease the academic gap of students’ when we actively and systematically teach vocabulary. One of the ways to do so might be use of technology as Green (2005) establishes that technology can play an integral part in improving students’ language learning abilities and in providing additional language learning opportunities beyond normal classroom environment. In one study, Yeh and Wang (2003) investigated the effectiveness of three types of vocabulary annotations which are text annotation only, text plus picture and text plus picture and sound on vocabulary learning for 82 ESL (English as a second language) college students who had already completed 6 years of formal English instruction at secondary education level in Taiwan. The students were randomly assigned to use one of these three versions then they were given a pretest focused on some of the new vocabularies that they will see during the intervention. After that, the researchers conducted a posttest to evaluate the results. The results have been found that a text plus picture annotation was the most effective for vocabulary learning and the students’ visual tendencies were stronger than their auditory tendencies. In another study, Coll (2002) studied the benefits of a hypermedia-enhanced learning environment for English for Specific Purposes (ESP) students. “The hypermedia-enhanced learning environment provides a rich environment where learners gain exposure to foreign language texts by listening and reading in the target language” (Coll, 2002). Forty students (18 males and 22 females) participated. All of the students had a lower intermediate level proficiency in English, which was the target language in this study. Chemistry-related videos (The World of Chemistry), comprehension tools (HyperCard), video lessons and selected demonstrations and animations were used to teach vocabulary development in the Chemistry field. Students were randomly assigned to a control group and an experimental group and were given a vocabulary achievement pretest and posttest. For assessment, a technical and subtechnical vocabulary achievement test based on the material covered in the hypermediaenhanced lessons was developed and conducted. As a result, the hypermedia-learning environment provided experimental subjects with exposure to new vocabularies to the students who were in experimental group and they accomplished a greater improvement in terms of overall vocabulary achievement test than those in the control group. Horst, Cobb and Nicolae (2005) investigated a set of existing and purpose-built-online tools in their experimental study for vocabulary learning. The participants were university ESL (English as a second language) students at Canada. A total of 33 students, 14 of the students spoke Asian languages, 12 spoke Romance language background (Spanish, France, or Portuguese) and 7 spoke Arabic, Farsi, and Russian. All the students were intermediate-level English learners. The technological resources used were cloze-builder, concordance, hypertext, and a database with interactive self-quizzing feature. Coxhead’s (2000) Academic Word List was used as targeted vocabulary learning. The participants were given specific -177- A Brief Review of Literature on Using Technology to Help Language Learners…E. B. Guzel reading passages and enter the words into the Word Bank as test targets on a pretest. Then, posttest was conducted to compare the students’ entry words into the Word Bank for comparison purposes. For assessment, a survey focused how often the students used each technological tool and their answers were categorized. The results were concluded that vocabulary knowledge of the participants increased substantially from 39% (pretest) to 77% (posttest) in terms of entered and un-entered vocabularies into the Word Bank program. Summary of Selected Literature In summary, the selected literature has shown that phonemic awareness (Lai, et al., 2009; , Carol & Kate et al ., 2002;, Chera &Wood, 2003 ), reading comprehension (Lange et al., (1999), Ray and Belden (2007) Vince Gaudio (2003) ), and vocabulary development (Yeh and Wang 2003, Coll 2002, Cobb and Nicolae 2005) ) are effective when combined with technology and implemented in teaching language to language learners. Implications for Practice The reviewed articles demonstrated that English language learners may significantly improve their language skills when technology is implemented in their native language learning process. In the study of Lai et al. (2009), using multimedia English learning system (MEL), in the study done by Chera and Wood (2003), using the software included six animated multimedia talking books, in the study of Ray and Belden (2007), using MediaMatrix system and In Vince Gaudio’s study in 2003, using the vocabulary building program included computerized vocabulary programs (95 vocabulary words recorded on CD accompanied with photos, mini picture dictionaries), vocabulary software (Rosetta Stone) and vocabulary based games (modern curriculum press picture vocabulary cards) have proved that using technology to teach phonemic awareness, developing reading comprehension and enhancing vocabulary development is an effective way in the language learning process of language learners. An additional implication for practice in the process of language learning is that students who are exposed to technology may use technological strategies that they learned in their other learning areas such as math, geometry, geography, biology and the list goes on. In the study done by Coll 2002, Chemistry-related videos (The World of Chemistry), comprehension tools (HyperCard), video lessons and selected demonstrations and animations were used to teach vocabulary development in chemistry field. Recommendation for Future Research Future research should examine computer based interventions in a more controlled environment (Ray and Belden, 2007). Next, Lange et al., (1999) recommended that the school administrations must be sure that the teachers are familiar and educated in terms of using technological software systems and should have a plan for integrating them into the content areas. In the study done by Horst, Cobb and Nicolae (2005) recommended that the researchers should investigate better developed vocabulary tests to assess the gains of students. They claim that there is not a well-developed vocabulary development assessment test for advanced level English learners. -178- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 173-180, 1 April, 2015 Conclusion In conclusion, the purpose of this paper was to provide a brief review of literature on the benefits of using technology to help language learners to improve their phonemic awareness, reading comprehension and vocabulary skills, review the implications for practice and provide recommendations for future research. In the studies reviewed, the researchers concluded that using technology to help language learners to improve their language skills is an effective way according to their results from experimental studies. These experiments in this study concluded that students showed significant improvements up to 70% in phonological awareness, while they demonstrated up to 76% of improvements in reading comprehension and up to 77% in vocabulary development. The use of computer-assisted technologies and its positive outcomes were encouraged to be used more widely by researchers and teachers by combining it to the curriculum in order to meet the diverse needs of students. References Bryant, P.E., & And, O. (1990). Rhyme and Alliteration, Phoneme Detection, and Learning to Read. Developmental Psychology, 26(3), 429-38. Burgoyne, K.K., Kelly nee Hutchinson, J.M., Whiteley, H. E., & Spooner, A. A. (2009). The Comprehension Skills of Children Learning English as an Additional Language. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 735-747. Calderon-Young, E. (1999). Technology for Teaching Foreign Languages Among Community College Students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 23(2), 161-169. Carreker, S. H., Swank, P. R., Tillman-Dowdy, L., Neuhaus, G. F., Monfils, M., Montemayor, M., & Johnson, P. (2005). “Language Enrichment” Teacher Preparation and Practice Predicts Third Grade Reading Comprehension. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 26(4-5), 401-432. Chera, P.,& Wood, C. (2002). Animated Multimedia “Talking Books” Can Promote Phonological Awareness in Children Beginning To Read. Learning And Instruction, 13(1), 33-52. Dickeman, G. J. (1995). Things That Help Us Perform: Commentary in Ideas from Donald A. Norman. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(1), 23-30. Felix, U. (2008). The Unreasonable Effectiveness of CALL: What Have We Learned in Two Decades of Research?. Recall, 20(2), 141-161. Flexer, C., Biley, K., Hinkley, A., Harkema, C., and Holcomb, J. (2002). Using sound-field to teach phonemic awareness to pre-schoolers, The Hearing Journal, 55(3), 38-44 Gaudio, V. (2003, May 1). Improving Reading Skills in ESL Students through an Intensive Vocabulary Building Program. Hatcher, P. J., & And, O. (1994). Ameliorating Early Reading Failure by Integrating the Teaching of Reading and Phonological Skills: The Phonological Linkage Hypothesis. Child Development, 65(1), 41-57. Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Nicolae, I. (2005). Expanding Academic Vocabulary with an Interactive On-Line Database. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 90-110. Juan Francisco Coll (2002). Richness of semantic encoding in a hypermedia-assisted instructional environment for ESP: effects on incidental vocabulary retention among learners with low ability in the target language. ReCALL, 14 , pp 263-284 doi:10.1017/S0958344002000526 -179- A Brief Review of Literature on Using Technology to Help Language Learners…E. B. Guzel Kuo, M. (2008). Learner to Teacher: EFL Student Teachers’ Perceptions on Internet-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching. Lai, Y., Tsai, H., & Yu, P. (2009). A Multimedia English Learning System Using HMMs to Improve Phonemic Awareness for English Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 266-281. Lange, M., McCarty, C., Norman, L., & Upchurch, N. (1999, May 1). Improving Reading Strategies through the Use of Technology. Leong, C., Tan, L., Cheng, P., & Hau, K. (2005). Learning to Read and Spell English Words by Chinese Students. Scientific Studies of Reading. 9(1), 63-84. Literacy as a Unidimensional Multilevel Construct: Validation, Sources of Influence, and Implications in a Longitudinal Study in Grades 1 to 4. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 85-116. Mehta, P. D., Foorman, B. R., Branum-Martin, L., & Taylor, W. (2005). Miller, D. (2011). ESL Reading Textbooks vs. University Textbooks: Are We Giving Our Students the Input They May Need?. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(1), 32-46. Nation, K., & Angell, P. (2006). Learning to Read and Learning to Comprehend. London Review of Education, 4(1), 77-87. Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K. K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The Dissociation of Word Reading and Text Comprehension: Evidence from Component Skills. Language and Cognitive Processes. 18(4), 443-68. Ray, R. D., & Belden, N. (2007). Teaching College Level Content and Reading Comprehension Skills Simultaneously via an Artificially Intelligent Adaptive Computerized Instructional System. Psychological Record, 57(2), 201. Rayner, Keith; Barbara at al. (2001). How Psychological Science Informs the Teaching of Reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest (2): 31-74 Stockwell, G. (2007). A Review of Technology Choice for Teaching Language Skills and Areas in the CALL Literature. Recall, 19(2), 105-120. -180- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE) Vol. 5(1), pp. 181-188, 1 April, 2015 Available online at http://mije.mevlana.edu.tr/ http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.15.04.5.1 The Effect of Drama in Education on Language and Communication Skills of Children Between 48-60 Month-Old Filiz Erbay Mevlana University, Education Faculty, Department of Preschool Education, Konya, Turkey Kezban Tepeli Selcuk University, Health Science Faculty, Department of Child Development, Konya, Turkey Özden Kuşcu Selcuk University, Health Science Faculty, Department of Child Development, Konya, Turkey Article history The purpose of present research is to explore the effect of Received: drama on language and communication skills of preschool 26.01.2015 children between 48-60 months. In this study pre-test, post-test Received in revised form: control grouped experimental design has been utilized on 07.04.2015 collectively 64 children; 32 children from test group and 32 children are from control group. Research data have been Accepted: 07.04.2015 compiled via Language and Communication subtest of “Psychological Observation Form for Preschool Children”. In Key words: data analysis descriptive statistics, independent samples t test, Drama in education, language two-way ANOVA form mixed measures have been used. skills, communication skills, preschool education Research findings have manifested that drama education improves language and communication skills of children. Introduction Language and communication skills are the kinds of abilities that improve human mental faculties such as learning, thinking, comprehending, questioning, problem-solving and faculties that enable the expression of feelings and thoughts, social interaction through communicating with others, integration with outer world and transmission of culture to the next generations. Furthermore it has great contribution on the fulfillment of needs and desires, betterment of social relations, building cooperation and handling conflicts (Aşıcı, 2003; Atay, 2009;Güneş, 2010). On accounts of all these reasons, starting from early ages language and communication skills need to be improved and supported via various educational programs (Ergin, 2003). That is related to the fact that language and communication skills, when treated collectively with other developmental fields, shall assist in raising healthy individuals. It can reasonably be argued that one of the most salient functions of preschool education institutions is developing language and communication skills of children. Parallel to this aim it is required to select the best methods that appeal to the nature of child, enable face-to-face interaction and create real-to-life teaching and learning environments (Görgülü, 2009). Drama activities are amongst these environments that might contribute to acquisition of language and communication skills during preschool period (Alber and Foil, 2003; Bulut, corresponding author: ferbay@mevlana.edu.tr The Effect of Drama in Education on Language and Communication Skills…F. Erbay, K. Tepeli & Ö. Kuşçu 2011; Erkoca Akköse, 2008; Furman, 2000; Maden, 2010;Mages, 2008;Maley, &Duff, 2010; Ormancı and Şaşmaz Ören, 2010; Tutuman, 2011). Drama in education might assist children in using language with all its aspects such as speaking, listening and establishing verbal and nonverbal communication (Toye and Prendville, 2000). While teaching, drama activities encourage children to experience emotions actively. Children are in need of language to create imaginary situations, animate and terminate these situations and put their feelings into words throughout this process (Toye and Prendiville, 2000). In busy class environments, children most of the time miss the opportunity to express themselves. Drama experience in education enables the children to use their language skills through integrating with games, stories, role-plays and drama activities and verbal selfexpression. Through drama the child can be in any place of drama activity as any person within different time periods and events and by manipulating a variety of speaking styles, s/he can grasp the chance for self- expression and social communication (Çömertpay, 2007). In education drama activities also play vital role in word acquisition and gain in children. Throughout this process it is likely that children meet a new subject they have not encountered before. This experience may enable the children to learn new words by repeating the words they encounter for the very first time (McCaslin, 2006). In the next stages these skills continue to improve as children imitate the people around, participate in other children’s games and establish communication. The acquisition of those skills are further strenghened while children use language and gain the awareness of words, sound and language structures (Alber and Foil, 2003). When participating in drama activities children also gain speaking, thinking, listening, narrating skills and abilities to build verbal and physical communication with one another. During these activities children learn how to express themselves freely since through learning new words and making sentences, they discover novel ways to establish communication. The child can attain all these skills while making plans within drama activity, solving dramatic problems, forming and playing the roles and trourugh natural reactions while interacting with the group. The child can also learn nonverbal communication thanks to drama activities. For instance during body movements, the child discovers how to establish communication by moving different parts of the body like head, face, eyes and arms (Adıgüzel, 2010; Rooyackers, 2009). Acquisition of communication skills before age six is greatly linked to the development of language. On that account it is vital that these skills be supported collectively or individually via a bunch of methods and techniques as well as structured and tailored programs. That is because a child capable of listening and speaking effectually takes one step ahead in developing effective learning strategies and acquisition of reading-writing skill just as s/he develops healthy social relations (Sevinç, 2003). As relevant literature is analyzed it is detected that the number of studies on the effects of drama activities over language development or skills or the impact of drama education on communication skills is rather limited. Thus it is considered that present research shall render contribution towards this aim. In a few studies in relevant literature the effects of drama education on children’s receptive and expressive language development, the quantity of words used by children and their use of nouns, verbs and conjunctions and their communication skills have been examined (Akoğuz, 2002;Arnas Aktaş, Çömertpay and Sofu, 2007; Çömertpay, 2006; Gönen and Dalkılıç, 2000;Görgülü, 2009; Solmaz, 1997, Uyar 1995). Since in this study language and communication skills are two variables analyzed as a unity it -182- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 181-188, 1 April, 2015 differs from the rest of studies in literature. It is believed that present research shall assist in spreading drama activities amidst preschool institutions; suggestions formed in line with research findings shall guide preschool teachers and constitute the subject of new studies that shall be presented to develop communication and language skills. Based on all these aspects, the purpose of current research is to analyze the effect of preschool drama activities on language and communication skills of 48-60 month-old children. Method Research model Dependent variable of this research is children’s language and communication skills and independent variable is drama education provided to children. In order to determine the effect of preschool drama program on language and communication skills of children pre-test, post-test control grouped experimental design has been utilized. Participants 64 children aged between 48 and 60 months old have been recruited from two preschool Education instutions which have smilar qualişties in terms of physical and facilities. Simple random sampling method has been used in selection process. 32 children attending to one of these preschool institutions have constituted test group while the remaining 32 children formed control group. In test group 47% of children (n= 15) are girls, 53% are (n= 17) boys. Their age varies between 50 to 60 months. Age average is 57.47, standard deviation is 5.56. In control group %50 of children (n= 16) are girls, 50% are (n= 16) boys. Their age varies between 52 to 60 months. Age average is 58.11, standard deviation is 5.25. It has been reported that of the research participants, 35.8% of children’s mothers are college graduates, 60.5% of children’s fathers are college graduates; 54.4% of children’s mothers are housewives, 26.2% of children’s fathers are workers; 86.3% of children come from nuclear families, 42.7% of children are without sisters/brothers; of all the children in test group 38.5% and of all the children in control group 35.6% have attended a preschool institution one year earlier. Instrument In this research “General Information Form” developed by researchers have been employed in order to gather certain information on the child and family (gender of the child, date of birth, education of parents, profession, family structure, number of children in family, having received preschool education or not). So as to measure children’s language and communication skills Language and Communication subtest of “Psychological Observation Form for Preschool Children” has been utilized. Psychological Observation Form for Preschool Children is a developmental observation form prepared by Turkish Psychological Association Preschool Education Commission (2000) to examine 36-78 month-old children. Composed of eight subtests (enrollment to preschool institution, basic habits, behaviors while playing, social-emotional behaviors, behaviors in educational activities, language and communication, drawing, challenging/problematic -183- The Effect of Drama in Education on Language and Communication Skills…F. Erbay, K. Tepeli & Ö. Kuşçu behaviors) and 137 items, this form not only contains items that describe current behavioral and emotional status of the child but also items that exemplify behavioral and communication patterns s/he develops. Observation form is completed by psychologists, trainers and teachers who have direct connection with the children in preschool care and education centers and the items reflect their personal observations. “Language and Communication” subtest of this form is made up of items related to the language development of the child, the way language is used in social communication and the way child expresses himself/herself. In “Language and Communication” subtest there are 12 positive and 2 negative items amounting to total 14 items. In this form behaviors to be observed are evaluated in a 5-point scale composed of categories, “Never (1) – Rarely (2) – Occasionally (3) –Often (4) – Always (5)”. In this test, negative behaviors are graded reversely. The lowest score to receive from Language and Communication subtest is 14, the highest score is 70. In this 5-grade Likert test the highness of scores indicates positivity whilst the lowness of scores indicates negativity. To calculate the sum of observation form, Cronbach-Alpha coefficient is .89, for Language and Communication subtest it is .92. Procedure For the children composing study group, measurement instrument has been applied as pre-test and post-test. Subsequent to pretest application, Education program prepared by researchers have been applied to children in test group for 14 weeks twice a week. Before the application of this program children have been met in the presence of their teachers, informed about the education to be provided and it has been attempted to comfort them about this application. Prior to preparing this program, literature analysis has been performed on the language and communication skills of 48-60 month-old children, next, the kind of objectives and acquisitions parallel to their developmental level have been designated and learning conditions for the activities have been presented. Education program involves movement activities, pandomime, role playing, improvisation and creation of story based plays. Due to the youngness of children and objectives of the applications, these activities have been performed in children’s own classrooms by dividing the whole group in two seperate small groups consisting of 16 children. In the aftermath of each activity, an evaluation has been made to allow students to make their own statements on their opinions and feelings regarding role plays. Considering the concentration length of children each session has lasted approximately 30 minutes. In the execution of drama activities story cards, photographs, pictures, masks, puppets, objects and similar materials have been utilized with the aim of increasing children’s attention span, providing visual enrichment in activities and concretizing abstract subjects. Particularly in movement activities, nonverbal music CDs and rhythm instruments have been employed. Data Analyses Pretest and post-test data obtained via Language and Communication subtest of Psychological Observation Form for Preschool Children from the sample consituted of experimental and control group have been analyzed by employing descriptive and parametric statistics. In order to detect if there is a meaningful difference between Language and Communication pretest average scores of the test and control group children constituting sampling group, independent samples t test has been used. To the end of detecting if language and communication skills of test and control group children varied with respect to receiving -184- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 181-188, 1 April, 2015 drama education program, two-way ANOVA for mixed measures have been employed (Büyüköztürk, 2011). Results The findings related to the research conducted to analyze if language and communication skills of children varied with respect to receiving or not receiving drama program in preschool education have been presented in following tables. In Table 1, t test results of pretest score averages obtained by test and control group children from Language and Communication subtest of Psychological Observation Form for Preschool Children have been provided. Table 1. t Test findings of language and communication pretest scores of children in test and control groups Variable Language and Communication Skill Test Group M SD 53.75 6.40 Control Group M SD 54.41 5.68 t df p Cohen’s d 0.43 62 .666 0.11 Table 1 manifests that the difference between Language and Communication pretest score averages of children in test and control groups is statistically insignificant, t(62)= 0.43, p>.05, d= 0.11. This finding proves that with respect to their language and communication skills, children in test and control group are the same before and after the application. For the children in test and control groups, pretest posttest score averages and standard deviations received from Language and Communication subtest of Psychological Observation Form for Preschool Children are as shown in Table 2. Table 2. Language and communication pretest-posttest score averages and standard deviation values received by children in test and control groups Variable Group n Language and Communication Skill Test Control 32 32 Pre Test M SD 53.75 6.40 54.41 5.68 Post Test M SD 62.31 5.24 58.69 5.54 As Table 2 is analyzed it surfaces that Language and Communication pretest score average of the children in test group is 53.75 and posttest score average of the children in test group is 62.31 (achievement score 8.56) whilst Language and Communication pretest score average of the children in control group is 54.41 and posttest score average of the children in control group is 58.69 (achievement score 4.28). As the averages of obtained scores are analyzed it is detected that Language and Communication subtest achievement score of children in test group is higher than students in control group; in another saying the increase in Language and Communication scores of the children in test group after they receive drama education is greater. ANOVA findings pertaining to Language and Communication pretest-posttest score averages of children in test and control groups are as presented in Table 3. -185- The Effect of Drama in Education on Language and Communication Skills…F. Erbay, K. Tepeli & Ö. Kuşçu Table 3. ANOVA findings pertaining to language and communication pretest-posttest scores of children in test and control groups Source Group (Test/Control) Measurement (PretestPosttest) Group x Measurement Error df 1 MS 70.508 F 1.28 p .263 η2 .020 1 1319.695 126.04 .000 .670 1 62 146.633 10.471 14.01 .000 .184 The difference in total averages of Language and Communication pretest-posttest scores received by test and control groups is statistically insignificant, F(1,62)= 1.28, p>.05, η2= .020. Regardless of the group of research participants there is a significant difference in Language and Communication score averages after the application, F(1,62)= 126.04, p<.001, η2= .670. It has also been detected that results of common effect (group x measurement) test conducted to see if creative drama education has a significant effect on children’s language and communication skills development are also found to be significant, F(1,62)= 14.01, p<.001, η2= .184. It has also been found out that compared to the students in control group, the changes from pretest to posttest indicating the development of language and communication skills were significantly higher in children of test group and that drama education had a major effect in improving language and communication skills of students. Discussion Present research has been conducted with the aim of detecting effect of drama education on language and communication skills of 48-60 month- old children and obtained findings have proved that drama activities improve such skills in children. This study showed that children in test group showed greater improvement in language and communication skills compared to control group children. This finding might be attributed to the facts that children in test group received drama training in addition to preschool education and applied drama education contained several activities directly supporting language and communication skills. By means of these activities children acquire a chance to go through many experiences which in return consolidate their knowledge levels and skills. Thanks to its natural and real-like environments, drama education positively contributes to children’s communication skills and language development.. While acting, children feel required to listen to each other in order to be better understood and state their words more attentively. This requirement might enable the children to acquire proper speaking habits by naturally driving children to concentrate on their voice tone, diction and speaking speed (Arnas Aktaş, Çömertpay and Sofu, 2007). Aside from that, in drama activities children’s body language and active movement of their body may also affect their vocabulary and use of drama activities in vocabulary teaching may act as a motivator factor for children’s learning (Alber and Foil, 2003). As relevant literature is analyzed it is possible to come across research findings indicating that drama education improves children’s language development and communication skills. Arnas Aktaş, Çömertpay and Sofu (2007) in their co-study have provided 8-week long creative drama training to 6 year-old preschool children. They have found out that the number of words, and employment of nouns, verbs and conjunctions used by children having received creative drama education have increased. Çömertpay (2006) has similarly reported that as a result of creative drama activities aiming at language acquisition, the number of words children use in a sentence increased and children uttered longer sentences and that the number of adjectives, nouns, noun phrases and verb phrases used by children has risen. Gönen and -186- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 181-188, 1 April, 2015 Dalkılıç (2000), via a 13-week long supplementary education program provided for 60-72 month-old children, have discovered that drama program in education leaves positive effect on children’s language development. Uyar (1995) and Solmaz (1997) have also underlined that receptive and expressive language development of children is emprowered by drama education. Görgülü (2009) in his research has reported that during preschool period, dramaassisted cooperative learning activities constitute an effective approach in the development of communication skills. Akoğuz (2002) has concluded that creative drama provides a meaningful difference in the betterment of communication skills. As manifested above findings of current research are supportive of results obtained from previous literature studies. Suggestions It has been detected in current study that drama education provided for 48-60 monthold preschool children has positive effect on language and communication skills of children. Based on the findings of this research following suggestions have been provided to increase the effect of preschool drama education on the development of children’s language and communication skills. It may be suggested that when preschool teachers feel a need to improve children’s language and communication skills, they can make use of activities that mix daily program activities with educational drama activities By identifying drama application competencies of preschool education teachers, education on planning and application of drama activities can be provided via in-service training programs for teachers demanding such assistance. References Adıgüzel, Ö. (2010). Eğitimde yaratıcı drama. ( Creative Drama in education) Ankara: Naturel Publ. Akoğuz, M. (2002). The impact of creative drama in improving communication skills. (Unpublishen mater thesis). Ankara University, Ankara. Alber, S., & Foil, C. (2003). Drama activities that promote and extend your students vocabulary proficiency. Intervention in School & Clinic, 39 (1) 22-29. Arnas Aktaş,Y., Çömertpay, B., & Sofu, H. (2007). The effect of cerative drama on the language utilization of 6 year old children. Creative Drama Journal, 1 (3-4) 7-26. Aşıcı, M. (2003). Çocuğum Okuryazar Oluyor. (My child is going literate). İstanbul: Morpa Kültür Yay. Atay, M. (2009). Erken Çocukluk Döneminde Gelişim 1.(Early childhood education 1) Ankara: Kök Yay. Bulut, İ. (2011). Does using drama in efl classes meet the needs of the learners? Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (1), 155-161. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (Manual data analysis for the social sciences) (Revised 13th ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yay. Cömertpay, B. (2006). The effect of drama on acquisition of children aged 5-6. (Unpublished master thesis). Çukurova University, Adana. Erkoca-Akköse, E. (2008). The effectiveness of creative drama in preschool science activities in determining the relationship in natüre events. Creative Drama Journal, 3 (6), 7-24. -187- The Effect of Drama in Education on Language and Communication Skills…F. Erbay, K. Tepeli & Ö. Kuşçu Furman, L. (2000). In support of drama in early childhood education, again. Early Childhood Education Journal, 27(3), 173–178. Gönen, M., & Dalkılıç-Uyar, N. (2000). Çocuk Eğitiminde Drama (Drama in Child Education). İstanbul: Epsilson Yay. Görgülü, F. (2009). Effects of drama ducation supported cooperative learning activities on the communication skills of 5–6 years old children. (Unpublished Masters Thesis). Adnan Menderes University, Aydın. Güneş, F. (2010). Effects of lullabies on linguistic and mental development of children, Journal of World of Turks, 2 (3), 27-38. Maden, S. (2010). Self-efficacy of Turkish teachers related to using of drama method. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 7 (4), 259-274. Mages, W. K. (2008). Does creative drama promote language development in early childhood? a review of the methods and measures employed in the empirical literature. Review of the Educational Research, 78 (1). 124-152. Maley, A., & Duff, A. (2010). Drama techniques. A resource book of communication activities for language teachers. (Penny Ur Ed.) (5th edit). England: Cambridge University Press. McCaslin, N. (2006). Creative drama ın the classroom (7th Edition), California, Players Pres, Inc. Ormancı, F., & Şaşmaz Ören, F. (2010). Classroom teacher candidates’ opinions related to using drama in primary school: an example of Demirci faculty of Education. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 43 (1), 165-191. Rooyackers, P. (2009). İlköğretim derslerinde 101 drama oyunu. (101 drama games in elementary school lessons) (Trans. Bengi Şen). İstanbul: Esin Yay. Sevinç, M. (2003). Dil gelişimi ve ilköğretime hazırlık. In M. Sevinç (Ed.), Erken çocuklukta gelişim ve eğitimde yeni yaklaşımlar. (169-176). İstanbul: Morpa Kültür Yay. Solmaz, F. (1997). Creative drama on the six years old childrens receive and expressive language development. (Unpublished master thesis). Gazi University, Ankara. Toye, N. & Prendiville, F. (2000). Drama and traditional story for the early years. London: Roudledge Falmer. Tutuman, O. Y. (2011). The proficiency of teachers of Turkish in the practice of creative drama. (Unpublished master thesis). Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir. Türk Psikologlar Derneği, Okul Öncesi Komisyonu (2000). Okul Öncesi Çocuklar İçin Psikolojik Gözlem Formu (36-78 Aylar Arası). Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yay. Uyar, N. (1995). Examining the effectiveness of the supplementary employed drama in education in drama program on the language development of 60-72 month-old kindergarden children. (Unpublished master thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara. -188- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE) Vol. 5(1), pp. 189-205, 1 April, 2015 Available online at http://mije.mevlana.edu.tr/ http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.15.05.5.1 Creativity And Sense Of Humor Of Elementary School Principals Bahar Şenol** Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Education, İzmir Ali Aksu*** Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Education, İzmir The purpose of this study was to determine primary school teachers’ perceptions of the extent of creativity behaviours and sense of humor applications of the primary school principals; Received in revised form: to find out whether teachers’ perceptions of primary schools’ 08.04.2015 principals’ creativity behaviour and sense of humor vary according to certain variables and whether there was a Accepted: 09.04.2015 significant relationship between the primary school teachers’ perceptions of creativity behaviours and their perceptions of Key words: humor styles of the primary school principles. The population Creativity, humor, sense of of the study consisted of teachers employed in primary schools humor located in İzmir Province in the 2011-2012 academic year. The sample included 390 teachers chosen from different socioeconomic level of districts. Two different questionnaires named “How Creative Are You?” and “Humor Styles Questionnaire” were used to gather data. The results of the study revealed that that there was a significant positive correlation between the teachers’ perceptions of creativity behaviours and their perceptions of sense of humor of the primary school principals. As a proposition, some ice-breaking activities should be held at schools in order to boost principals’ creativity and sense of humor. Article history Received: 02.02.2015 Introduction Through the contributions of numerous authors such as Torrance and Rhodes, valuable insights have been obtained regarding the concept of creativity. These insights led to investigations upon the definition of creativity (Torrance, 1962), unearthing of its characteristics (Rossman, 1931; Wallas, 1926; as cited in Aktamış and Ergin; 2007), discovering the characteristics of creative individuals (Alder, 2004; Morris, 2006). Creativity is recognized as coming up with a solution out beyond ordinary thinking by executing the abilities of thinking with a different point of view and curiosity in the presence of numerous alternatives in order to bring out new solutions for a problem (Orçan, 2013). The word of creativity emphasizes the revelation of relationships others disregard, not the process of creating out of nothing (Et Al, Cengiz; 2007). Everybody can have inborn creativity. Though This studyis derived from the master thesis of Bahar Şenol ** E-mail: baarsenol@hotmail.com *** E-mail: ali.aksu@deu.edu.tr Creativity And Sense Of Humor Of Elementary School…B. Şenol & A.Aksu most of the time it is beyond our consciousness and willpower, creativity differs in sustainability, development, degree and emergence depending on individuals (Argun, 2004). Information society is based on a perspective focusing on the individual. In this sense, creativity and diversity of people arising simply from being individuals bear great significance. Education, which develops creativity and is an indispensable element of diversity, has an indispensable role in this regard (Yucaoglu, 2000). Creativity is product of creative individual. Thus, creativity is primarily individualistic. On the other hand, organizational creativity can only be delivered by promoting a supporting atmosphere, which is quite friendly for members to perform their creativity (Çekmecelioğlu, 2002). Competitive environment and innovational demand require working atmosphere promoting creative abilities, though it appears as if workers’ did not matter for organizations (Mumford Et Al., 2002: 705). One of the greatest challenges leaders face in our age is to be able to keep up with the rapid changes in the environment. As the globalized world requires the globalization of quality, we should intend to build new strategies and perspective rather than simply embracing current administrative techniques (Yurtseven, 2001). Contemporary principals need to adopt a creative standpoint in application and development of administrative works in rapidly changing contexts. So as to optimize the interaction of organization and environment, principals either display a creative and innovative performance or encourage chiefs and other staff for creativity and innovation by promoting an appropriate climate (Budak, 1998). Creative principals should build up an ambiance in their organizations supporting innovation, discovery and originality. They need to support creativity actively through role modeling as well as providing a creative environment (Yildirim, 2007). In order to carry out schooling in line with their goals, principals, teachers, and students are needed to have certain qualities, first of which is creativity in terms of discovering new concepts, techniques and ways of working (Akdağ and Güneş, 2003). There appear certain duties a creative school principal should deliver, such as (Sungur, 1992: 38-39): To make firstly other directors, heads, teacher, and school staff believe and respect creative thinking. To develop a regular system receiving the comments of teachers and school staff. To promote the feeling of honour in school system To put ideas into practice disregarding fatalism. To provide opportunities and resources for research. To settle school problems taking initiative setting aside school rules. To pay special attention not to impose his thoughts. To pay attention to different points of view in the system without ignoring them. To provide financial prospects for teachers to give their ideas a try. To make long term plans leading the programs. To avoid announcing truly creative teachers not to demotivate other non-creative teachers, though supporting the creative ones properly. To spare some time for teachers to work on and try out their original ideas. To have an attraction for every aspects of education and to improve himself in different fields of interest. -190- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 189-205, 1 April, 2015 In the literature, humor is described as the skill of looking into situations and events via different perspectives, and regarded as a prominent product of art and literature for the development of creativity (Savaş, 2013). Investigating the definitions of creativity and humor, it reveals that humor can be taken as an outcome of creativity. As Kuiper and Martin (1993) put forward, humor and psychological health concepts such as well-being and life satisfaction have been associated throughout the recent research development. The results of the investigations reveal that humor is related to positive concepts. Researchers also have found out that people having high sense of humor could cope with stress more effectively and they could construct more healthy relationships with others (Aslan, 2006). Furthermore, some people can employ negative humor as a way of self-humiliation. Research findings have shown that humor can bear certain harmful elements related to the individual’s psychological status (Martin, 1998). Humor can be used as an invisible weapon in social interactions. For instance, sometimes people can rely on humor during a dispute to insult and degrade their opponents (Zelvys, 1990). One can relate to humor as a self-interest or an interpersonal instrument. There are four kinds of styles categorized as coherent or incoherent. In terms of psychological well-being, two of these styles are positive and healthy, and on the other hand the other two are negative and unhealthy (Erickson and Feildstein, 2007: 259). These styles are: (1) Affiliative humor, (2) Self-enhancing humor, (3) Self-defeating humor, (4) Aggressive humor Research findings point out a significant correlation between humor and school context. Proper utilization of humor can improve flexibility on personal thoughts, enhance communication, provide alternative views and goodwill in feelings; and all of these factors affect the leadership and school context positively (Ozdemir, 2002). School principals play a crucial role in school wide communication. As long as the school principals have a positive attitude, teachers, students and parents tend to be willing to participate in instructional activities in schools, which consequently lead them to adopt positive attitudes towards school environment. It is considered that adoption of a humorous in communication by the school principal will help promote the idea of working together to resolve some difficulties and create a positive environment (Sepetçi, 2010). Besides, principals’ success in communication depends on having certain basic characteristics, such as physical appearance, energy, speed of talking, pitch and tone of voice, reconstruction, movements of arms and heads. Along with these synergetic traits, humor obviously occupies a significant spot in organizational communication (Özdemir, 2002). The function of humor in providing flexibility, communication, and alternative points of view can lead to positive working atmosphere in school settings. Principals can contribute to their organizations by assisting employees’ self-realizations. A study on this issue has revealed that there is a positive correlation between school head’s appreciation of humor and school atmosphere. Thus, any progress in school principals’ sense of humor can result in positive and significant improvement in school environment (Çimen, 2011: 27). School principals’ use of healthy humor in educational institutions could encourage teachers to deal with the stress in their school environments effectively. When national and international literatures are analysed, it’s recognized that teachers’ (Aslan, 2006) and school principals’ (Yılmaz, 2011) types of sense of humor are studied, and the -191- Creativity And Sense Of Humor Of Elementary School…B. Şenol & A.Aksu relationship among sense of humor and fatigue (Karagöz, 2009), job satisfaction (Recepoğlu, 2008, Hurren, 2006), coping with stress (Özdemir and et. al, 2011, Evans-Palmer, 2010), instructional leadership (Recepoğlu & Özdemir, 2012), levels of motivation (Eroğlu, Akyol & Gündüz, 2014), teacher leadership (Kılınç, Recepoğlu & Koşar, 2014) and management success (Gürbüz, Erdem & Yıldırım, 2013) are examined. Sense of humor facilitates acceptable solutions to social and individual problems as a consequence of stimulation of creativity (Ay, Gökler, Koçak, 2013). Thus, the determination of how these sense of humor and creativity levels of school principals to be perceived by teachers, and construction of relationship between these levels are seen crucial in terms of contribution to the literature. Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine primary school principals’ creativity and sense of humor level according to teachers’ perceptions; and whether these perceptions show significant difference according to demographic such variables as gender, age and professional seniority; and to investigate the relationship between creativity scores and sense of humor scores. Therefore, the present study tried to shed light on the following questions: 1) What is the level of primary school principals’ creativity according to teachers’ perceptions? 2) Do teachers’ perceptions about creativity differ significantly according to their gender, age, and professional seniority? 3)What is the level of primary school principals’ sense of humor according to teachers’ perception? 4) Do teachers’ senses of humor differ significantly according to their gender, age, and professional seniority? 5) Are teachers’ perception of primary school principals’ creativity and of their sense of humor correlated significantly? Method This study was designed in correlational research model. Correlational design is defined as the investigation of relationships among variables, in a specific time period (Fraenkel ve Wallen, 2010). In this study, the relationship between school principals’ sense of humor and creativity levels are analysed in term of teachers’ perception. Procedure and Participants Teachers employed in primary schools located in the province of İzmir in 2011-2012 instructional year constituted the total field of this research. 30 districts in the province of Izmir are divided into three groups as (upper, middle and lower) with stratified sampling method depending on Socio-Economic Development Ranking research, made by State Planning Department in 2004. A questionnaire with three or four parts was presented to 450 teachers to be answered voluntarily. Following the collection of the questionnaires, 390 (86.66%) of the questionnaires were taken into consideration and statistically processed. 63.30% of the participants were female, and 34.10% of them were over the 41 years old. Furthermore, 81.50% of the participants had a bachelor's degree, and %24.87 of them had 21 years of service, 53.58% of the participants were primary school teachers (classroom teachers) and %71.80 of them worked in socio-economically upper grade schools. -192- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 189-205, 1 April, 2015 Data Collection Data collecting tools used in this research are personal information forms, “How creative are you?” scale which was developed by Eugene Raudsepp in order to determine creativity level and adapted to Turkish language by Çoban (1999) and “Humor Experience Scale” which was developed by Martin and Puhlik Doris (1999) and adapted to Turkish by Yerlikaya. Data collecting instruments were combined into one form and applied together. “How creative you are” scale is calculated by Çoban and found .42. (Çoban, 1999: 194). Besides, the scale is applied to 120 teachers in two primary schools by the researcher and the study of reliability and validity are repeated. The Cronbach Alpha coefficient is found .90 for creativity. Types of sense of humor scale’s statistics of reliability and validity are carried out by Ercüment Yerlikaya. In the work of the scale’s adaptation to Turkish, each sub-scale’s internal reliability of Cronbach Alpha coefficient is calculated as follows: For participative humor .74, self-enhancing humor .78, aggressive humor .69, self-defeating humor .67. The reliability coefficient of sub-scales against time is as follows respectively .88, .82, .85, .85 (Yerlikaya, 2003: 38). Results Throughout this section, in connection with the purpose of this research, the results derived from the questionnaires were analysed. Researchers utilized SPSS 15 software for the necessary calculations. For the pair comparisons, t-test was executed, and then in the comparison of more than two groups, one-way ANOVA analysis (F) was used. The relations between primary school principals’ creativity and their sense of humor were solved with Pearson Correlation Coefficient. 1. What is the level of primary school principals’ creativity according to teachers’ perception? When we consider that the lowest score is -2 and the highest score +2 for the each item, the item based average of teachers’ answers who participate the research range from -.26 to .83. Primary school principals’ creativity behaviour according to teachers’ perception in the overall scale evaluation was found “Neutral/Undecided” ( x = .35). Table 1. The Highest Scored Scale Items of Teachers’ Perception about Primary School Principals’ Creativity Behaviour Item Number Perception Level N Ss x 40th Item 24th Item 1st Item * p<.05 The highest The highest The highest 389 389 389 .83 .78 .74 .88 .93 .96 When we analyze Table 1, the highest perceived item is the 40th item with x = .83 “He/She believes that the road to success requires to be hardworking”. The next highest item is the 24th item with x = .78 “ Self-respect is more important than the respect which other people show to you” The other highly perceived item is the 1st item with x = .74 “When he/she is trying to solve a specific problem, he/she is quite sure about the way that he/she handles the problem.” -193- Creativity And Sense Of Humor Of Elementary School…B. Şenol & A.Aksu Table 2. The Lowest Scored Scale Items of Teachers’ Perception About Primary School Principals’ Creativity Behaviour Item Number Perception Level N Ss x 37th Item The lowest 389 .26 1.00 th The lowest 389 .15 1.09 th The lowest 389 .15 1.01 39 Item 35 Item * p<.05 When we analyze Table 2, the lowest perceived item is the 35th item with x =- .15 “It is waste of time to analyze a person’s mistakes. The next lowest item is the 39th item with x = -.15 “He/She often forgets people’s, cities’ and roads’ names.” The other lowest perceived item is the 37th item with x =- .26 “Unless they are arrested, he/she always admires the ingenuity of a fraudulent.” 2. Do the perceptions of teachers’ about creativity show any significant difference according to their gender, age and professional seniority? Table 3. T-test Results of Teachers’ Perceptions About Primary School Principals’ Creativity Behaviour According to Their Gender Variable Scale Scores Gender N x Ss Sd t p Female 247 17.53 20.00 388 .16 .87 Male 143 17.89 22.83 * p<.05 When Table 3 was analyzed, it is seen that there isn’t any significant difference in teachers’ perception about primary school principals’ creativity behaviour according to their gender (t=-.16, p=.87) Table 4. One-Way ANOVA Results of Teachers’ Perceptions About Primary School Principals’ Creativity Behaviour According to Their Age Variable Age Group Sum of Square Sd Mean Square F P Sig. Between Groups Within Groups Total * p<.05 1999.85 170415.80 172415.60 4 385 389 499.96 442.64 1.13 .34 - When the table 4 was analyzed, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups according to the results of one-Way ANOVA analysis carried out to determine whether there is a significant difference in teachers’ perceptions about primary school principals’ creativity behaviour according to teachers’ age variable. Teachers in each age group perceive the creativity exhibited by primary school principals at the same level. -194- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 189-205, 1 April, 2015 Table 5. One-Way ANOVA Results of Teachers’ Perceptions about Primary School Principals’ Creativity Behaviour According to Their Professional Seniority Variable Pro. Seniority Between Groups Within Groups Total * p<.06 Sum Squares 4084.87 168330.80 172415.60 of Sd 4 385 389 Mean Square F P Sig. 1021.22 437.22 2.34 .05 * When the table 5 was analyzed, a statistically significant difference was found between the groups according to the results of one-Way ANOVA analysis which was carried out to determine whether or not there is a significant difference in teachers’ perception about primary school principals’ creativity behaviour according to teachers’ professional seniority variable. [F (4,385) =2.34; p<.06]. LSD test results obtained after ANOVA in order to determine between which professional seniority groups the significant differences occur in teachers’ perception about primary school principals’ creativity behaviour are shown in Table 6. Table 6. LSD test results showing the significant difference in teachers’ perceptions about primary school principals’ creativity behaviour according to professional seniority groups Independent Variable Seniority Group Seniority Group 1-5 years 6-10years 11-15years 16-20 years over 21 years 11-15 years 16-20 years over 21 years 16-20 years over 21 years over 21 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 16-20 years Mean Difference .63 -4.79 4.67 -3.85 -5.42 4.04 -4.48 9.46 .94 -8.52 p .86 .21 .26 .30 .07 .25 .13 .01* .76 .02* * p<.05 When the Table 6 analyzed, in creativity behaviours, there is a statistically significant difference between the teachers having teaching experience between 11-15 years and the teachers who have 16-20 years. (p = .01 < .05) and the difference is in favor of the teachers having 11- 15 years of teaching experience. Besides, There is also statistically significant difference between the teachers with 16 – 20 years of teaching experience and those with over 21 years (p=.02<.05), and this difference is in favour of the teachers with more than 21 years of teaching experience. Considering the values in the table, it is seen that the teachers who have professional experience between 11-15 years and the teachers who have experience more than 21 years find the primary school principals more creative than the other seniority groups. 3. “What is the degree of school principals’ sense of humor according to the perceptions of teachers?” -195- Creativity And Sense Of Humor Of Elementary School…B. Şenol & A.Aksu It can be observed that the average of the teachers’ responses to the items fluctuates between 3-4.44, provided the minimum score is 1 and the maximum score is 7. The school principals’ sense of humor, according to the teachers’ perceptions, is observed at the level of “Neutral/Undecided” ( x =3.73). Table 7. The Scale Items Having the Highest Score About Teachers’ Opinions on the Primary School principals’ Sense of Humor Item Number Level of Perception N x Ss 1st Item 29thItem 13th Item Highest Highest Highest 389 389 389 4.45 4.44 4.33 1.64 1.49 2.05 When the table 7 examined, the 1st item “S/he does not laugh generally or does not make jokes with others” has the highest score x = 4.45. Item 29th “When among others s/he cannot recall humorous things to tell” is the other item with a high score x = 4.44. The next item with the high score, item 13th, “S/he makes lots of jokes with close friends often” has the score of x = 4.43. The items - 1, 13 and 29- with the highest perception scores belong to the Affiliative (Social) Humor sub- category. It has been observed that the perception of item 13 with the highest perception score “Not Clear”, item 1 and 29 “Little Disagree” in the Humor Experiences scale. It is taken into consideration that item 1 and 29 are scored in the opposite direction. Table 8. The Scale Items Having the Lowest Score About Teachers’ Opinions on the Primary School principals’ Sense of Humor Item No Level Perception 4th Item 27th Item 20th Item Lowest Lowest Lowest of N 389 389 389 x Ss 2.77 2.97 3.34 1.71 1.58 1.51 When the table 8 examined, item 4 “S/he allows other people to make fun of her/him or laugh at her/him more than necessary” has the lowest score of x = 2,77. The other lowest score, x =2, 97, belongs to the item 27 “When s/he does not like a person, s/he makes jokes about that person or makes fun of that person in order to humiliate him/her.” The next item with a low score is item 20, x =3, 34, “While making jokes or trying to be funny, generally s/he criticizes herself/himself more than necessary.” The lowest items 4 and 20 belong to the subcategory of Self-defeating Humor and item 27 belong to the Aggressive Humor subcategory. 4. Do the teachers’ perceptions on the primary school principals’ sense of humor differ according to their gender, age group or job experience variables? Table 9. T-test Results of the Teachers’ Perceptions on the Primary School Principals’ Sense of Humor According to their Gender Variable Dimensions n x Ss -196- Sd t P Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 189-205, 1 April, 2015 Affiliative Female Male 247 143 33.63 33.05 8.26 8.48 388 .66 .51 Self-enhancing Humor Female Male 247 143 30.61 31.43 6.89 6.43 388 -1.17 .25 Aggressive Humor Female Male 247 143 27.98 28.50 6.79 6.74 388 -.74 .46 Self-defeating Humor Female Male 247 143 26.51 27.20 6.95 7.65 388 -.91 .36 247 143 118.72 120.19 18.30 18.29 388 -.76 .45 Total Female Male *p<.05 When the table 9 examined, it has been observed that teachers’ perceptions on the primary school principals’ sense of humor have no meaningful differences according to the gender variable since the findings are as follow; for Affiliative Humor [t=.66; p>.05], for Selfenhancing Humor [t=-1.17; p>.05], for Aggressive Humor [t=-.74; p>.05], for Self-defeating Humor [t=-.91; p>.05], and for the overall scale [t=-.76;p>.05]. Table 10. T-test Results of the Teachers’ Perceptions on the Primary School Principals’ Sense of Humor According to Their Age Variable Age Group Affiliative Humor Between Groups Within Groups Total Self-enhancing Humor Between Groups Within Groups Total Aggressive Humor Between Groups Within Groups Total Self-defeating Humor Between Groups Sum Square of Sd Mean Square of F p Meaningful Difference 1306.41 25710.30 27016.71 4 385 389 326.60 66.78 4.89 .00 * 741.64 16857.40 17599.04 4 385 389 185.41 43.79 4.23 .00 * 57.63 17599.21 17836.83 4 385 389 14.41 46.18 .31 .87 - 873.46 4 218.37 4.35 .00 * -197- Creativity And Sense Of Humor Of Elementary School…B. Şenol & A.Aksu Within Groups Total 19348.84 20222.30 385 389 50.26 Overall Between Groups Within Groups Total * p<.05 5962.35 124161.0 130123.3 4 385 389 1490.59 322.50 4.62 .00 * When the table 10 examined, it has been observed that teachers’ perceptions on the primary school principals’ sense of humor has no meaningful difference according to the age variable for Aggressive Humor [F (4,385)=.31; p>.05]. However, since the findings for Affiliative Humor [F (4,385) =4.89; p<.05], for Self-enhancing Humor [F (4,385) =4.23; p<.05], for Aggressive Humor [t=-.74; p>.05], for Self-defeating Humor [F (4,385) =4.35; p<.05], and for the overall scale [t=-.76; p>.05] are as seen, a meaningful difference can be observed according to the age variable. In another words, teachers’ age variable is not a significant determiner for the aggressive humor dimension; nevertheless, for affiliative humor dimension, self-enhancing humor dimension, for self-defeating humor dimension and for the overall scale the age variable is a determiner for the “principals’ sense of humor.” Table 11. LSD test results showing the meaningful differences in the age groups according to the teachers’ perceptions on primary school principals’ affiliative humor Affiliative Humor Independent Variable Age Group Age Group Difference Between Means p 20-25 26-30 8.97 .00* 31-35 36-40 41 and above 31-35 36-40 41 and above 36-40 41 and above 41 and above 8.59 10.55 9.70 -.38 1.58 .73 1.96 1.11 -.86 .00* .00* .00* .77 .24 .54 .12 .31 .47 26-30 31-35 36-40 * p<.05 When the table 11 examined, for the Affiliative Humor subcategory, comparing the teachers at the age group (20-25) to the (26-30) (p=.00<.05), to the (31-35) (p=.00<.05), to the (36-40) (p=.00<.05), and to the (41 and above) (p=.00<.05), an advantageous meaningful difference has been observed for the teachers at the age group (20-25). Table 12. LSD test results showing the meaningful differences in the age groups according to the teachers’ perceptions on primary school principals’ self-enhancing humor. Selfenhancing Humor Independent Variable Age Group Age Group 20-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41 and above 31-35 26-30 -198- Difference Between Means 3.76 3.92 6.14 2.74 .16 P .06 .04* .00* .15 .89 Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 189-205, 1 April, 2015 31-35 36-40 36-40 41 and above 36-40 41 and above 41 and above 2.38 -1.02 2.22 -1.17 -3.39 .03* .29 .03* .18 .00* * p<.05 When Table 12 is analyzed, at the "self-enhancing humor" subscale there is a significant difference between the teachers in the age group of (20-25) and the teachers in the age group of (31-35) according to the value (p=.04<.05) , and the teachers in the age group of (36-40) according to the value (p=.00<.05). This difference is in favor of the teachers in the age group of (20-25). Moreover, at the same subscale, between the teachers in the age group of (26-30) and the teachers in the age group of (36-40) compared to the value (p = .03 <.05, there is a significant difference in favor of the teachers in the age group of (26-30). At the same subscale, between the teachers in the age group of (31-35) and the teachers in the age group in the age of (36-40) compared to the value (p=.03<.05) a significant difference is observed in favor of the teachers in the age group of (31-35). In addition, at the same subscale, between the teachers in the age group of (36-40) and the teachers in the age group of (41 and over) compared to the value (p = .00 <.05), there is a significant difference in favor of the teachers in the age group of (41 and over). Table 13. LSD test results showing the meaningful differences in the age groups according to the teachers’ perceptions on primary school principals’ self-defeating humor Self-defeating Humor Independent Variable Age Group Age Group 20-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41and above 31-35 36-40 41and above 36-40 41and above 41and above 26-30 31-35 36-40 Difference Between Means 3.49 .71 4.28 1.09 2.79 .79 -2.40 3.58 .39 3.19 P .10 .74 .04* .60 .01* .50 .02* .00* .68 .00* * p<.05 When Table 13 is analysed, at the “self-defeating humor” subscale there is a significant difference between the teachers in the age group of (20-25) and the teachers in the age group of (3640) according to the value (p=.04<.05) ). This difference is in favor of the teachers in the age group of (20-25). There is also a significant difference between the teachers at the age group of (31-35) and the teachers in the age group of (26-30) according to the value (p=.01<.05), and the teachers in the age group of (36-40) according to the value (p=.00<.05). This difference is in favor of -199- Creativity And Sense Of Humor Of Elementary School…B. Şenol & A.Aksu the teachers at the age group of (31-35). Moreover, at the same subscale, between the teachers at the age group of (36-40) and the teachers at the age group of (41 and over) compared to the value (p = .03 <.05, there is a significant difference in favor of the teachers in the age group of (36-40). Table 14. LSD test results showing the meaningful differences in the age groups according to the teachers’ perceptions on the general scale of primary school principals’ humor experiences General Independent Variable Age Group Age Group 20-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41 and above 31-35 36-40 41 and above 36-40 41 and above 41 and above 26-30 31-35 36-40 Difference Between Means 17.33 14.21 21.04 14.37 -3.12 3.72 -2.96 6.84 .16 -6.68 P .00* .00* .00* .00* .26 .21 .26 .01* .94 .01* * p<.05 When Table 14 is analysed, throughout the sense of humor, there is a significant difference between the teachers at the age group of (20-25) and the teachers in the age group of (26-30) according to the value (p=.00<.05) ;the teachers in the age group of (31-35) according to the value (p=.00<.05); the teachers in the age group of (36-40) according to the value (p=.00<.05) and the teachers in the age group of (41 and over) according to the value (p=.00<.05). This difference is in favor of the teachers in the age group of (20-25). Moreover, at the same level, between the teachers in the age group of (31-35) and the teachers in the age group of (36-40 ) compared to the value(p=.01<.05), there is a significant difference in favor of the teachers in the age group of (31-35). There is also a significant difference between the teachers in the age group of (36-40) and the teachers in the age group of (41 and over) according to the value (p=.01<.05) in favor of the teachers in the age group of (41 and over). Table 15. The results of One-way analysis of variance according to the variable of occupational seniority of teachers' perceptions of primary school principals’ sense of humor Seniority Sum Square of Sd Mean square of F P Significant difference Affiliative Humor Between Groups Within Groups Total 473.91 26542.80 27016.71 4 385 389 118.48 68.94 1.72 .15 - Self-enhancing Humor Between Groups Within Groups Total 445.14 17153.90 17599.04 4 385 389 111.28 44.56 2.50 .04 * -200- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 189-205, 1 April, 2015 Aggressive Between Groups Within Groups Total 252.71 17584.13 17836.83 4 385 389 63.18 45.67 1.38 .24 - Self-defeating Humor Between Groups Within Groups Total 118.09 20104.21 20222.30 4 385 389 29.52 52.22 .57 .69 - General Between Groups Within Groups Total 1836.62 128286.70 130123.30 4 385 389 459.15 333.21 1.38 .24 - * p<.05 When table 15 is analysed, there is not a significant difference of the teachers’ perceptions participating in the research relating to the primary school principals’ sense of humor according to the seniority variable as “the level of affiliative humor” is [F (4,385) = 1.72; p > .05], the level of aggressive humor is [F (4,385)=1.38; p>.05] , the level of Selfdefeating humor is [F (4,385)=.57; p>.05] and the whole research subject of sense of humor is [F (4,385)=1.38; p>.05]. However, there is a significant difference according to the seniority variable as the level of self-enhancing humor is [F (4,385) =2.50; p<.05]. In other words the seniority of teachers is not a determining variable at the levels of affiliative humor, aggressive humor self-defeating humor and the sense of humor of primary school principals. But it is a determining variable at the level of self-enhancing humor. Self-enhancing Humor Independent Variable Seniority Group Seniority Group Year 1-5 Year 6-10 Year 11-15 Year 16-20 21 and above Year 11-15 Year 16-20 21 and above Year 16-20 21 and above Year 6-10 Year 11-15 -201- Differences of Means 1.79 2.24 3.32 .46 .45 1.53 -1.33 1.08 -1.78 P .13 .07 .01* .70 .65 .17 .16 .35 .07 Creativity And Sense Of Humor Of Elementary School…B. Şenol & A.Aksu Year 16-20 21 and above -2.86 .01* Table 16. LSD test results showing the meaningful differences in the seniority groups according to the teachers’ perceptions on primary school principals’ self-defeating humor * p<.05 When table 16 is analysed, there is a significant difference between the teachers whose seniority is (1-5 years) and the teachers whose seniority is (16-20) according to the value (p=.01<.05) and this difference is in favor of the teachers whose seniority is (1-5 years). Moreover at the same level, there is a significant difference between the teachers whose seniority is (16-20 years) and the teachers whose seniority is (21 and more years) according to the value (p=.01<.05) and this difference is in favor of the teachers whose seniority is (21 and more years). 5. According to teachers’ perception, what is the relationship between the creative behaviour and the sense of humor of primary school principals? Table 17. The level of the creative behaviour and the principals’ sense of humor, n, Ss and x Scores Scales N Ss x Creative Behaviour Total Score 390 .42 Sense of Humor Total Score 390 .57 When Table 17 is analysed, the creative behaviour of primary school principals x =.35, and their sense of humor x =3.73 are evaluated in neither agree nor disagree level. The results of Pearson's Correlation Coefficient determining the relationship between the creative behaviour and the sense of humor of primary school principals are presented in Table 18. Table 18. The results of Pearson's Correlation Coefficient Determining the Relationship Between the Creative Behaviour and the Sense of Humor of Primary School Principals Total Score of Creative Behaviour Total Score of Sense of Humor * p<.001 Total Score of Creative Behaviour 1 Pearson Correlation Sig.(2-Toiled) N Pearson Correlation Sig.(2-Toiled) N 390 .219** .000 390 Total Score of Sense of Humor .219** .000 390 1 390 When Table 18 is analysed, there is positive, significant relationship between the scores of creative behaviour and sense of humor. (r=.219, p<.01). There exists moderate positive, -202- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 189-205, 1 April, 2015 significant relationship at the level of 0.22 between creative behaviour and sense of humor. It can be interpreted that as creative behaviour of primary school principals increases, their sense of humor increases, too. Discussion And Conclusion In the light of the results of this study, it was revealed that teachers perceived school principals’ creativity at the level of “not sure”. According to Ciftci (2011), the reason behind the decisions made without utilizing individual creativity and variety of alternatives is focusing on the result without even realizing the causes. It is understood that it requires more creativity and attention to generate alternatives when the conflicts between possible decisions increase at the time of solving a problem. In this context, it can be thought that teachers are not sure in evaluating school principals’ creativity because they witness that principals behave inconsistently while trying to solve a problem because of their (principals) limited capacity in administrating duties and negative learning experiences. It has been found out in this study that regarding teachers’ perceptions the most rated item for principals in the questionnaire has turned out the item “she/he believes it needs working hard to succeed something” Simontan emphasized that creative is the one who works very hard, who focuses on success among everything, and who is ambitious, determined, persistent and excited. During the process of creating, one performs extraordinary physical and psychological energy (Sungur, 1992). Bearing this in mind, it is a necessity for principals not to decide very quickly when come across a problem. They need to work hard on it and generate alternative solutions for it. Teachers’ perceptions have been revealed as “not sure” regarding school principals’ sense of humor. Cetin (2009) puts forward that people with a sense of humor can not reveal this at a strict and bureaucratic organizational atmosphere, though they can easily express their sense of humor in at warmer and intimate organizational climate. In this context, strict and formal atmosphere at schools is considered to have negative effects on school leadership and leaders’ communication skills with school personnel. Teachers, likewise, tend to have doubts about leaders’ sense of humor at schools where strict atmosphere is prevalent. Teachers’ high scores on the item “the principal does not smile and make jokes around” have indicated that smiling and making jokes have positive effects on creating positive organizational climate, and absence of smiling and joking can be considered to be among negative leadership behaviours of the school principals. As an outcome of this study, a noteworthy correlation has been revealed between school principals’ creativity and their sense of humor. With this in mind, it is right to point out that school principals’ creativity increase depending on the increase in their sense of humor. Furthermore, as school principals’ capacity of humor raise, their level of creativity goes up as well. As a proposition, some ice-breaking activities should be held at schools in order to boost principals’ creativity and sense of humor. References -203- Creativity And Sense Of Humor Of Elementary School…B. Şenol & A.Aksu Akdağ, M. ve Hasan, G. (2003). Öğretmen rolünün yaratıcı bir sınıf ortamı oluşturmasındaki önemi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 159. Aktamış, H. ve Ergin, Ö. (2007). Bilimsel süreç becerileri ile bilimsel yaratıcılık arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim FakültesiDergisi, 33, 11-23. Argun, Y. (2004). Okul öncesi dönemde yaratıcılık ve eğitim. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. Aslan, H. (2006). Ortaöğretim kurumlarında görev yapan öğretmenlerin öğrenilmiş güçlülük düzeyleri ve cinsiyetlerine göre mizah tarzlarının incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Ay Ö., Gökler R., (2013). Humor styles, creativity and life satisfaction: a study on high school students, International Journal of Social Science, 6(6), pp: 739-767 Budak, G. (1998). Yenilikçi yönetim yaratıcı birey. İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık. Çekmecelioğlu, H. G. (2002). Bireysel, örgütsel yaratıcılık ve yaratıcılık için iş çevresinin düzenlenmesi: bir araştırma. Doktora tezi. Gebze İleri Teknoloji Enstitüsü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Çimen, B. (2011). Devlet ve özel okullarda görev yapan sınıf öğretmenlerinin öğretim sürecinde mizah kullanma yeterlilikleri konusundaki algıların incelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Akdeniz Üniversitesi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Eroğlu-Akyol M., Gündüz H. B. (2014). The motivation level of the teachers according to the school managers’ senses of humor. ERPA International Congress on Education, ERPA Congress 2014, Volume 152, 7 October 2014, Pages 205–213 Erickson, S. J. ve Feildstein, S. W. (2007). Adolescent humor and its relationship to coping defense strategies, psychological distress and well-being. Child Psychiatry and Human Development. 37(3). DOI: 10.1007/s10578-006-0034-5 Evans-Palmer, T. (2010). The potency of humor and instructional self-efficacy on art teacher stress. Studies in Art Education, 52(1), 69-83. Fraenkel, J. R. ve Wallen, N. E. (2010). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Gürbüz, R., Erdem. E., Yıldırım. (2013). Başarılı okul müdürlerinin özellikleri, Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20, 167-179. Hurren, B. L. (2006). The effects of principals’ humor on teachers’ job satisfaction. Educational studies, 32(4), 373-385. Karacabey, M.F. (2011). Özel ve resmi ilköğretim okulu yönetici ve öğretmenlerin örgütsel yaratıcılık algıları. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Harran Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Karagöz ,O. (2009). İlköğretim Türkçe öğretmenlerinin mizah tarzları ile tükenmişlik düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki, Maltepe Üniversitesi , Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Eğitim A.B.D, İstanbul Kılınç A. Ç., Recepoğlu E. Koşar S. (2014). Relationship between high school principals' humor styles and teacher leadership, International Journal of Education, 6(3) Kurtuluş, N. (2012). Yaratıcı düşünmeye dayalı öğretim uygulamalarının bilimsel yaratıcılık, bilimsel süreç becerileri ve akademik başarıya etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, KTÜ Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü: Trabzon. Martin, R. A. (1998). Approaches to the sense of humor: a historical review. (Ed: W. Ruch) 15-62. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Martin R. A., Kuiper, N.A., Olinger, J. L. ve Dance, K. A. (1993). Humor, coping with stress, self-concept and psychological well-being. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research. 6, 89-104. Orçan, A. (2013). Çizgi-roman tekniği ile geliştirilen bilim kurgu hikâyelerinin öğrencilerin yaratıcı düşünme becerilerine etkisi, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi: Ankara -204- Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 5(1); 189-205, 1 April, 2015 Özdemir, A. (2002). Okul yöneticiliğinde mizahi yaklaşım. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3. Recepoğlu E. (2008). Okul Müdürlerinin Mizah Yeteneğinin Öğretmenlerin İş Doyumlarına Etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 33(150), 74-86 Recepoğlu E., Özdemir S. (2012). Okul müdürlerinin mizah tarzları ile öğretim liderliği davranışları arasındaki ilişki. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(3). Savaş, S. (2013). The effects of the use of humor at seventh grade on student achievement in Turkish courses. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences 1, 176-186. Sepetci, C. (2010). Okul yöneticilerinin mizah tarzlarının betimlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi.Gazi Osmanpaşa Üniversitesi.Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Sungur. N. (1992). Yaratıcı düşünce. İstanbul: Evrim Yayınevi. Temizkalp, G. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının yaratıcılık düzeyleri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Inc, USA: Prentice-Hall Yıldırım, E. (2007). Bilgi çağında yaratıcılığın ve yaratıcılığı yönetmenin önemi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Karaman İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 12. Yurtseven, H. R. (2001). Yaratıcı yönetim. Çanakkale: Çanakkale On Sekiz Mart Üniversitesi Yayınları. Zelvys, V. I. (1990), Obscene humor: What the hell? Humor. International Journal of Humor Research, 3. -205-
© Copyright 2024