How to improve the EPBD impact, how to assess better innovations?

© Aereco 2008
Jean-Luc Savin, Aereco (EuroACE member)
ASIEPI Web event, 25 February 2009
How to improve the EPBD
impact, how to assess better
innovations?
The point of view of EuroACE and
Aereco
© Aereco 2008
ƒ
Founded in 1998 by 20 of Europe’s leading companies
involved with the manufacture, distribution and
installation of energy saving goods and services.
ƒ
In response to European Council of Ministers proposals
to combat the threat of climate change, which
completely ignored any potential for reducing
energy consumption in buildings.
ƒ
EuroACE works together with the European institutions
to help Europe achieve greater sustainable energy
use in buildings and significant reductions in
carbon dioxide emissions.
© Aereco 2008
22 members
in 2009
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Acciona
Aereco
Armacell International
BING
CRH
Danfoss
Honeywell
Hunter Douglas
Huntsman Polyurethanes
Tremco illbruck
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Kingspan Insulated Panels
Knauf Insulation
Paroc
Philips Lighting
Pilkington
Rockwool International
Saint-Gobain Isover
Skanska
Somfy
United Technologies
URSA Insulation
VELUX A/S
© Aereco 2008
A cross-sector
representation
Ventilation
Roof
insulation
Glazing
Floor Insulation
Heating/cooling controls
On-site alternative
energy installations
Lighting
Wall insulation
Boiler/cooler
Regenerative Drive Elevators
© Aereco 2008
Goals
The challenge:
ƒ To ensure that not only is the potential for saving energy in
buildings recognised, but policies are introduced.
ƒ To stimulate investment in all energy efficiency measures in
buildings.
Methods:
ƒ Continuous dialogue with those in the European Union
charged with delivering programmes.
ƒ Several substantial research projects, intended to facilitate
effective policy making in this area and expand the market
for EuroACE's members' products and services.
© Aereco 2008
Contact
EuroACE
Avenue Louise 375 - Bte 4
BE-1050 BRUSSELS
Tel.: +32 (0) 2 639 10 10
Fax: +32 (0) 2 639 10 15
www.euroace.org
info@euroace.org
© Aereco 2008
Research, design and manufacture of
energy efficient domestic ventilation
systems
ƒ Founded in 1984
ƒ Head office and factory in France, 10 subsidiaries and offices Worldwid
ƒ 250 employees
ƒ Inventor of the humidity sensitive ventilation system in 1984
ƒ Specialised in Demand Controlled Ventilation
© Aereco 2008
Assessment of Demand Controlled
Ventilation (DCV) in the EPB
3 cases in the EU:
Assessment and value available in the regulation framework
(France, Humidity controlled ventilation)
Assessment not available in the “standard” tools, but specific
procedure/method to assess the performance (ATG- E in
Belgium)
No possibility to assess or value the performance of DCV
(case of most of the countries)
© Aereco 2008
Assessment of Demand Controlled
Ventilation in France
Technical Approval (delivered by CSTB*)
To assess energy savings and indoor air quality
when using Demand Controlled Ventilation
Predictive energy consumption and indoor air
quality by the mean of an ad hoc dynamic
software (SIREN)
* Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment
© Aereco 2008
Occupation
scenario
Dwelling
configuration
DCV
system
SIREN
software
Indoor Air
Quality
(cumulated
ppmh
CO2)
“Equivalent”
constant
airflow
Weather
conditions
© Aereco 2008
Constant airflow
Ventilation system
Demand Controlled
Ventilation system
Regulation
(« arrêté du 24
mars 1982 »)
Technical
approval
Requirement of a
constant airflow
depending on the
dwelling type
“Equivalent”
constant
airflow
Calculation
tool
Energy
performance
of the dwelling
© Aereco 2008
Assessment of Demand Controlled
Ventilation in France
Principle of equivalence (average controlled airflow
equivalent to a constant airflow at same IAQ), given by
technical approval delivered by CSTB.
Advantage = enable the use of the existing calculation tools.
BUT need of complementary certified supports (technical
approvals).
© Aereco 2008
To assess a product… or a system?
EPBD’s principle is to improve the global
performance of the building.
The energy performance of a product depends strongly on its:
Environment (system and other influencing elements)
Tests conditions
© Aereco 2008
To assess a product… or a system?
High
performance
system
Engine X
CAR
EU energy label
© Aereco 2008
To assess a product… or a system?
Engine X
Low performance
system
CAR
EU energy label
© Aereco 2008
To assess a product… or a system?
Same engine, different car energy performance…
The complete system can be energy-labeled, not
the product/component.
© Aereco 2008
To assess a product… or a system?
Application on HVAC systems:
Constant
airflow
extract units
Fan
(optimised for DCV)
88 kW.h
per year
EU label for ventilation: « ECODESIGN Lot 10 Environmental performance of residential room
conditioning appliances (airco and ventilation) »
Constant
airflow
extract units
© Aereco 2008
To assess a product… or a system?
Application on HVAC systems:
Demand
controlled
extract units
Fan
(optimised for DCV)
Demand
controlled
extract units
52 kW.h
88
per year
A fan EU label does not enable to assess the
effective performance of the product and the
system.
© Aereco 2008
To assess a product… or a system?
Application on HVAC systems:
Demand
controlled
extract units
Fan
(optimised for DCV)
Demand
controlled
extract units
52 kW.h
88
per year
The use and the environment of the product should
always be taken into account to assess its EU energylabel.
© Aereco 2008
Regulations and innovation
Regulations = Picture of the state-of-the-art with the
available technologies.
Regulations can be considered as barriers for
innovation as soon as they are not able to value
improvements on energy performance supplied by
a new technology.
Need for frequent evolutions of regulations and
calculation tools to better take into account efficient
innovations.
© Aereco 2008
Conclusions
ƒ The lack of assessement procedures and the length for
technical approvals are real barriers for innovations in regard
with EPBD.
ƒ Assessment of complete system is more representative than
a product or component assessment.
ƒ Principle of “equivalence” is a fast and efficient way to enable
and to assess innovation without revolutionning the existing tools.
ƒ While calculation tools must be easy to use, simplification is
not always possible: it does not enable to take into account the
specifities of the innovations.
© Aereco 2008
Thank you for your attention