Title: “Reflexions about how to build a degrowth process in Brazil” Authors: BOCCATO-FRANCO, Alan Ainer; FRANCO, Edson; GUSTACK DELAMBRE, Mildred1 Contact: nova.oikos@gmail.com Organization: Rede Brasileira pelo Decrescimento Sustentável (Brazilian Network for Degrowth) ABSTRACT This is the very beginning of Degrowth visibility in Brazil: as a slogan, degrowth isn't understood; as movement, it is not acknowledge; as a theory or idea, it is an imported speech. Brazil is a continent-sized country with a “promising growing economy” and an oppressive social and economical disparity. If in one hand, Brazil wasn't hit by the economic crisis that still touches with more or less intensity, all Europe, since late 2000's; in the other hand, it is affected by corruption and power concentration (political, economic, resources). One of the reasons for immunization before the crisis is the huge pent-up demand in the Brazilian domestic market that made the new, enthusiastic, medium and lower classes a trump card for growth policies, which engenders all the negative consequences the degrowth current denounces. We conclude thereby, that Brazilian profile in contrast to the French, for instance, doesn't encourage more activists, politicians or academicians to get engaged in the transition process promoted through the Degrowth slogan. There is no wide questioning about the meaning of economic growth in relation to the idea of development, both being intimately linked in the imaginary of society and its institutions. This lack of questioning leads Brazil to the same path (and mistakes) that developed countries had in search of what was believed to be “progress”, “development” and “prosperity”. Nevertheless, we identify in Brazil a range of opportunities to promote a transition and to bring into the political debate the introduction of a new perspective of development, focused on human well-being in harmonious relationship with the environment. With this paper, we want to expose what has already been done and explore what can be done to raise awareness and spread 1 Corresponding author: +55 48 3225 0867, Adress: Rua Santa Cecilia, 734. 88340-000, Camboriú, Santa Catarina, Brazil. solutions related to the issues raised by Degrowth. The objective of this paper is to identify actors (movements, networks, researches, politicians, practical experiences, opinion makers) in synergy with degrowth fundamentals and therefore, representing spaces for strengthening the debate and practical action that can serve as a reference in developing more accurate strategies to operate a "post-growth society. We will open the Degrowth political toolbox and show its connections to social and environmental movements that are gaining visibility and thus, space for growing in Brazil. Further, we will set up a few propositions that are likely to enhance the dialogue between the different movements and actors, as well as the cohesion within the degrowth partners. Keywords: Solidarity Economy, Political strategy, participatory transition, degrowth process, social movements 1 – Introduction Regardless of the sincerity of many activists, which is not at issue in this paper, it is clear that sustainable development was from its inception a weapon against social and ecological contestations that began to make a dangerous approach to dominant interests. The equivalent is to be found on green economy, which strips the pretension of social concern from the sustainable development and appears as to create jobs, and therefore profits, dues to the market of new and “greener” technologies. The perception of the unsustainability of economic and social systems and the urgent need of change are increasingly shared by social movements and critical intellectuals. Once eliminated the false illusions, we agree that the core of the system must be addressed both on theoretical, political and practical spheres. The Degrowth movement is certainly not single, as the ecosocialism2 for instance, has as much place as many other movements and schools of thought that argue for alternative paths and views of development. A closer look shows that there are more elements in common between them then issues that could divide, and this point should be 2 KOVEL, Joel; LÖWY, Michael (2001) An Ecosocialist Manifesto in http://ecosocialistnetwork.org/? page_id=10 [visited on 01/09/2012] emphasized in order to gather further efforts towards a convergence of movements. The predictable failure of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED or simply Rio+20) is the confirmation that consolidated democracies, that are fated to choose among candidates subservients to the dogma of growth, aren't able to overcome their national interests at these meetings. Parallel to such international events we can frequently discover a wide range of actions and meetings that despite of their eventual discretion can be found to be much richer and succeed more pragmatic results. According to Philippe Léna, research director from the Research Institute for Development (IRD, France) in Brazil, “one of the highlights of Rio+20, and perhaps the most promising, was the creation of the Brazilian Network for Sustainable Degrowth”. According to Léna “ independent of the political position, growth is part of the national culture and representations are non questionable values. Nevertheless, it is in emerging countries (especially Brazil) that are the material, technical and financial means that could implement another society model before being fully prisoners of the system, as is the case for Europe, the USA and Japan.” In Brazil, an emerging country and currently the sixth world economic, questioning economic growth can be considered heresy or even lack of patriotism. In fact, they are punctual and marginal groups that question economic growth explicitly either in the political institutional, academic and social movements and civil society sphere as pointed out by Boccato-Franco (2012). However, it exists in Brazil an initial organization process on degrowth, and in addition, there are various organized sectors of society that implement actions that appear to have direct relation with the elements that characterizes degrowth. In this context, this article aims to list some initiatives already implemented under degrowth flag, and to identify groups in synergy with degrowth elements. Thus, they may represent spaces for debate and strengthening of practical actions that can serve as a reference in developing strategies to operate more precisely, a "post-growth" society. 2 – Which connections Degrowth movement can be represented in practice by some particular tools, be it in political, social or personal spheres. Degrowth “is a social movement born from experiences of cohousing, squatting, neo-ruralism, reclaiming the streets, alternative energies, waste prevention and recycling” (Martinez-Alier, 2012). Degrowth also implies “a reduction of production and consumption in physical terms through downscaling (and not only through efficiency improvements)” (Kallis, 2010). The expressions of “another” economy in Brazil are projects that are likely to enhance the dialogue between the different actors and movements, as well as the cohesion within degrowth partisans. Its identification represents one first step. The next one would be to open the dialogue and to develop tools likely to strengthen ties and overcome the differences to a convergence of struggles. In order to identify some convergent elements between degrowth and some social movements or social actors in Brazil, we used four of eight goals or “R” proposed by Latouche (2009): • Restructure - to adapt the productive apparatus and social relations in the light of changing values. One of the aspects related to this goal is to design economic and social institutions in a different logic, such as market and currency, as well as remuneration for work and business and financial benefits. These economic relations should not be dominant or hegemonic neither in the production nor in the goods and services flow. • Redistribute – to distribute the wealth and the access to natural heritage. It covers all elements of the system, such as the land, the rights to use the natural resources, the jobs and the income. In the case of land management, for example, it can be represented by shorten the land dedicated agribusiness, the interruption of land speculation and desertification by the reorientation of land use to peasant agriculture and ecology; • Relocalize - to produce locally what is intended to meet the needs of the population. Local businesses could be financed by savings collected locally. To think and to devise a local monetary policy, so that money flows remain as much as possible in the region and economic decisions are taken locally. The • local, complementary and social currencies have an important role to this goal. Reduce – to reduce the impact that our ways of producing and consuming have on the biosphere, by limiting the overconsumption and waste.. It implies the reduction of production and consumption of toxic products, both in the aspect of health toxicity and mental contamination. One of the very important requirements is to reduce the advertising system, waste and residue from industrial agriculture, and the production and use of individual automotive vehicles. 2.1 – Permaculture, ecovillages, transition towns. Grassroots movements have an essential role to the experimentation and mediation of life-styles and collective organization that resonate with what Degrowth reclaims for society. In this section we will briefly present three different fronts that nevertheless are closely related. The most widespread definition of an ecovillage seems to be the one of Robert Gilman (1991) who proposes four essential characteristics: “a human‐scale and full‐featured settlement (food, leisure, social life, education, business, residence), in which human activities are harmlessly integrated into the natural world in a way that is supportive of healthy human development and can be successfully continued into the indefinite future”. It remits us to the permaculture practices that suggest to work the nature and the human economy as the complex system that they are, applying a holistic strategy and according to the following core ethics principles (Holmgren, 2007): • Care for the earth: acknowledge Man as a part of Earth, not apart from it; • Care for the people: support and help each other to develop healthy societies, look after self, kin and community; • Fair share: to ensure that Earth's limited resources are used equitably and wisely, setting limits to consumption and production and redistributing eventual surplus. Permaculture is considered a interdisciplinary, systemic or holistic methodology, which aims to help on designing, planning and building ecologically sustainable human settlements, as much socially equitable and economically viable as possible. It values the ethical behavior and follows principles of energy efficiency. From this position results a set of techniques likely to harmoniously integrate human activities and ecosystems. Permaculture promotes the rehabilitation of sites degraded by human activity and the re-design of territories (house, neighborhood, city, industrial area, plots damaged by pollution, etc.). The Transition Towns movement has its origins on permaculture principles and techniques and direct it to complex settlements such as cities and commercial districts. The Transition Network was founded with the aim to inspire, encourage, connect, support and train communities adopting and adapting the model of transition to urgently rebuild their resilience (ability of a system to withstand external shocks) and drastically reduce its CO2 emissions. Transition Initiatives create a promising process that engages individuals, communities, institutions and cities to, together, think and implement the necessary actions for the short, medium and long term addressing to Climate Change and Peak Oil. The idea is that each community use its creativity to make the change. For large cities, an alternative is to transition the neighborhoods, first strengthening locally and then regionally. We could find around 23 transition initiatives in Brazil, spread in 9 different States. They act in very distinct environments, from slams to rich neighborhoods. Permaculture projects are much more present as they are set up in the country from little family farms or gardens, up to the more formal Institutes. This is also one of the reasons of the difficulty to localize and measure the size of the permacultural community in Brazil. Some groups get organized into quite strict structures and networks on which new projects can integrate as they follow some guidelines. The “Permear Network”, for instance, counts 18 associated Permaculture Stations as they convey to name it. To integrate the network (either virtually and physically), besides the real and active presence, an actual participant of the network shall indicate the person or the project as candidate, during a regional meeting, acknowledging its compromise to the permaculture ethical principles. The next step as candidate is to visit another three established participants projects, participate in a National Meeting presenting its own projects and realizations and achieve the mutual approval and empathy3. According to Permear Network, another 5 groups act in Brazil and 24 initiatives (among which, the 18 official participant of the network). In spite of Permear, several institutions and organizations, including those supported by the government such as EMBRAPA (Brazilian Enterprise for Farming Research), form and train people and projects (commercial farms, ecological and touristic sites, family farms, among others) on the principles and techniques of permaculture. The Permaculture Institutes are in number of 10, spread in different regions of the country. For the ecovillages, the scenario differs in size and organization. The very few communities we were able to identify as ecologist are normally found in naturally beautiful locations, either on the coast or close an even inside the forests. For that reason, a strong touristic appeal is usually what motivates new visitors that are not necessarily introduced to its context. In order to achieve economic autonomy they can offer hosteling service, as well as camping placements or more sophisticated rooms. Further, some other paid services can be placed as touristic structure like tracking, guided tours, bike rentals, massages, organic‐local meals, etc. As the visitants enjoy their “green”, “agro” or “adventure” holidays, they get in touch to all alternatives practices and activities that are running all around the ecovillage. They can choose either to participate in some task, discuss with the residents or be informed and thus, indirectly sensitized, through signs, folders, and other informative materials available, like films and books. Briefly, all these shy initiatives meet and mix with more important movements in Brazil: the solidarity-based economy and the agroecology. In the one hand they all act locally keeping in its core the global issues that motivates their work – a global economy that seeks profit versus a local and community-based economy that seeks well-being. In the other hand, a strong environmental concern that stimulates the creativity in the quest for ecological solutions. characterized as “practices of economic and social relationships based on solidarity and collaboration, inspired by cultural values that place the human being as subject and purpose of economic activity, rather than private accumulation of wealth in general and capital in particular” (FBES, 2003)4. Some principles present in the Charter of Solidarity Economy (FBES, 2003) converge with elements that constitute degrowth: I) to build a system of solidary finance, where the core value is the right of communities and nations to achieve financial sovereignty , on which at micro, local and regional level, cooperative and ethical banks, credit cooperatives and solidarity microfinance institutions are important components of the socio-economic system, facilitating popular access to credit based on savings. At the macro, national and structural level, the SE supports the decentralization of national currencies, encourages fair trades using community currencies, proposes the control and regulation of financial flows to fulfill its role as an instrument and not as the purpose of economic activity; and argues for the imposition of limits on interest rates and earnings; ii) the development of solidary productive chains that articulate consumption and production, that consider marketing and finance from local to the global level; that keep economic and social activity rooted in its immediate context and where the territoriality and local development are benchmarks; the development of trade networks with fair prices, where the benefits of productive development are shared more equitably between groups and countries; the development of a project designed to encourage people and communities to appropriate resources and tools in order to produce and to distribute the wealth and to fill the needs of everyone and the genuine sustainable development. 2.2 – Solidarity Economy 4 Practices related to Solidarity Economy cover a broad spectrum of activities. In 2007, Brazil had 21.859 Solidarity Economic Enterprises cataloged in the Solidarity Economy Information System, involving directly 1,687,496 workers5. These Solidarity Economic Enterprises Solidarity Economy (SE) in Brazil is 3 http://www.permear.org.br/rede/ [visited on 29/08/2012]. 5 Charter principles of the Solidarity Economy: http://www.fbes.org.br/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=63&Itemid=60 [visited on 29/08/2012]. Solidarity Economy Atlas – Web Version: http://www.mte.gov.br/sistemas/atlases/ [visited on consist on exchange clubs (exchange of goods and services), associations and groups of production, cooperatives, recuperated enterprises, commercial initiatives (central commercialization, fairs, shops, stores, common warehouses and centers for commercialization), initiatives for collective savings, credits and finance (cooperatives of credit, community banks and mutual funds ) and the collective use and consumption of goods and/or services . The identification of these practices are carried out through participatory self-managed guarantee systems and involve a number of processes in the production chain. It aims to create an identity within the territories, strengthening short and medium production chains, commercialization and consumption, favoring, therefore, supportive local development6. In the context of these practices, consumption is a responsible and political act. The market is acknowledge as a place for knowledge exchange, of sharing and to build social ties turned to solidarity and peace. The construction of a solidary finance system is currently underway in Brazil. Part of this system is composed, for instance, by credit cooperatives operating resources of saving cooperatives and the governmental credit programs in order to boost credit to their members. The National Association of Credit Cooperativism of Family and Solidarity Economy (ANCOSOL) represented, in 2006, 174 credit cooperatives, which together gather approximately 154.000 members distributed in 15 Brazilian states7. Another example is the 51 community banks in Brazil that constitute a Brazilian Network of Community Banks8. These banks are created and managed by the communities in the form of self-management. Many of them operate social and local currencies,, which favors the money flow inside the community, increasing the capacity of local economy and the wealth flow in the community. The local currency circulation is free at local market. To encourage its use, producers and merchants offer discounts to whomever uses them. The access to local currency is made through loans in the national currency at the community bank, by providing services to someone who has the currency, by exchanging the national currency by local currency directly at the community bank or by receiving financial benefits of productive enterprise when the person is a member9. The Solidarity Economy in Brazil has a large and complex organizational structure and articulation. Part of this structure is composed of: i) Brazilian Forum of Solidarity Economy 10 (FBES) is an instrument of articulation composed of more than 160 Municipal, Microregional and States Forums, directly involving more than 3,000 social economy enterprises, 500 support entities, 12 state governments and 200 municipalities; ii) Network ofSolidarity Economy and Public Policy Managers11 ; iii) Articulation Forum of Fair and Solidarity Trade (Faces do Brasil)12, which mission is to foster the construction of fair and solidarity trade; iv) Parliamentary Group of Solidarity Economy, composed by nationals deputies and senators, as well as Parliamentary Groups in some Brazilian States; v) National Secretariat of Solidarity Economy13 under the Ministry of Work and Employment, besides municipal and states solidarity economy programs, departments and secretariats; vi) Solidarity Economy National Council is collegian body structure of the Ministry of Work and Employment, composed by federal and state body, public financial institutions and representatives of solidary economic enterprises (Brazil, 2006), and state councils with similar character. The Solidarity Economy also has an informational apparatus composed of: i) the National Information System in Solidarity 9 6 7 8 29/08/2012]. Solidarity Economy: Another economy at the service of life (Economia Solidária: Outra economia a serviço da vida). http://www.fbes.org.br/index.php? option=com_docman&task=doc_details&gid=1114&Ite mid=216 [visited on 29/08/2012] http://www.ancosol.org.br/composicao.php [visited on 29/08/2012] http://www.bancopalmas.org.br/oktiva.net/1235/secao/9 963 [visited on 24/08/2012] 10 11 12 13 http://www.bancopalmas.org.br/oktiva.net/1235/secao/2 3739 [visited on 24/08/2012] http://www.fbes.org.br/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=61&Itemid=57 [visited on 25/08/2012] http://www.itcp.coppe.ufrj.br/rede_gestores/ [visited on 29/08/2012] http://www.facesdobrasil.org.br/ [visited on 29/08/2012] http://portal.mte.gov.br/ecosolidaria/secretaria-nacionalde-economia-solidaria/ [visited on 29/08/2012] Economy14 and the Atlas of Solidarity Economy under the responsibility of the Ministry of Work and Employment; ii) an economic and a social network on the Internet, the Cirandas 15, which offers tools to promote economic, social and political articulation; iii) the Solidarity Economy Sniffer16, that is a search tool on the internet to localize solidarity economy enterprises in Brazil. There are state and municipal laws that specifically address the SE, and countless propositions of laws that, in general, create municipals and state councils, policies and funds to encourage solidarity economy. Most of these laws and bills have been proposed to the legislature by popular initiative. Nevertheless, there is no federal legal definition of what is solidarity economy and enterprises, as well as principles and guidelines to a national policy for the sector. To fill this gap, the movement of SE is collecting signatures to submit to the Brazilian legislatives a popular proposition of law that, among others , defines as characteristics of solidarity enterprises: a democratic administration with the sovereignty of the assembly, the practice of fair prices without profit maximization and, the fair distribution of results17. There is no law that addresses community banks and local currencies, a fact that creates an institutional insecurity for these banks. In the case of cooperatives, current legislation in Brazil is not proper to solidarity enterprises. However, there are bills moving in National Legislative to regulate community banks and local currencies 18, as well as a new General Law of Cooperatives 19 14 http://www.mte.gov.br/sistemas/atlas/atlases.html [visited on 25/08/2012] 15 http://cirandas.net/ [visited on 25/08/2012] 16 http://www.fbes.org.br [visited on 25/08/2012] 17 http://www.fbes.org.br/? option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=1131 [visited on 23/08/2012] 18 Bill nº 93/2007 (Projeto de Lei Complementar nº 93/2007), House of Representatives. http://www.camara.gov.br/proposicoesWeb/fichadetram itacao?idProposicao=361065 [visited on 22/08/2012] 19 Senate Bill nº 3/2007 (Projeto de Lei do Senado nº 3) http://www.senado.gov.br/atividade/materia/detalhes.as p?p_cod_mate=79846 [visited on 22/08/2012] Senate Bill nº 153/2007 (Projeto de Lei do Senado nº 153). http://www.senado.gov.br/atividade/materia/detalhes.as p?p_cod_mate=80378 [visited on 22/08/2012] 2.3 – Agroecology The movement for agroecology in Brazil is organized in the National Articulation of Agroecology (ANA) that is a network that brings together non-governmental movements, networks and organizations engaged in implementing concrete experiences to promote agroecology20. The principles that guide the ANA's proposals are expressed in its Politic Charter21. One of these principles is the rural sustainable development based on social justice and the distribution of productive resources, with a focus on family farming and agroecology. Its principles explicitly defend the disappearance of land ownership based on latifundium and big rural enterprises. It is remarkable that it explicitly advocates for a limit to size of private property. ANA supports the National Campaign for Limiting the Size of Land Ownership, as well as some organizations that are part of ANA, the National Forum for Agrarian Reform and Countryside Justice. The Forum organized, in 2010, the Popular Referendum for the Limit of Land Ownership22. ANA assume local sustainable development as a strategy for implementing a global transformation design, which highlights the local population and its cultural diversity. It considers that the recuperation of culture, values and way of life proper to each people are essential to build local development processes. It also have a direct confrontation with the agribusiness, considering that this agriculture is the expression of the current economic development model that perpetuates, during more than five centuries, the domination by the agrarian elites in Brazil. It also defend the basic right of food featuring several initiatives such as the rescue and conservation of local seeds and animal breeds and the diversification of production systems, enhancement of self-consumption, recover of food culture, the development of food quality and food education. Regarding the market, ANA assumes that: 20 http://www.agroecologia.org.br/index.php/sobre-a-ana 21 Politic Charter – I National Meeting of Agroecology (2002): http://www.encontroagroecologia.org.br/ and Polic Charter – II National Meeting of Agroecology (2006) http://184.107.57.144:10480/quotaAna/ana/anasite/publicacoes/carta-politica-do-ii-ena/ [visited on 24/08/2012] 22 http://www.limitedaterra.org.br/ [visited on 24/08/2012] i) markets should be designed as a means of conducting economic exchanges and not as an end in itself; ii) the agroecological product should be accessible to all people; iii) new relations with markets should be grounded on ethical and solidarity basis, reconnecting producers and consumers; iv) productive activities geared to markets must be developed to ensure and strengthen the production oriented to selfconsumption. ANA evaluates that the experiences of local markets and direct sales to consumers, as agroecology fairs, are privileged spaces for the construction of more fair and favorable relations between producers and consumers and that it also has been considered as learning spaces that permit the strengthening of community ties. As an example of the informational structure of the agroecology movement, we emphasize the Agroecology Network23 consisting of an information system initiatives in agroecology managed jointly by the ANA, the Brazilian Association of Agroecology (ABAAgroecology)24 and Scientific Society for Latin American Agroecology (Socla)25. This system provides information on practical experiences, research and teachings in Brazil and other Latin American countries, related to agroecology. There is also the Brazilian Journal of Agroecology which publishes scholarly articles and essays on original and innovative agroecology and related fields of knowledge. Within the government, we found the Parliamentary Group for Development of Agroecology and Organic Production installed in the House of Representatives. Recently, it was established the National Policy for Agroecology and Organic Production, which aims to integrate, coordinate and adapt policies, programs and actions that induce the agroecological transition under the organic and agroecological production base. Besides, it was created the National Commission for Agroecology and Organic Production, composed of government representatives and civil society (Brasil, 2012). 2.4 – Mobility – Brazilian Critical Mass The “Bicicletada” is a monthly action inspired by Critical Mass where cyclists gather to 23 http://www.agroecologiaemrede.org.br/ [visited on 24/08/2012] 24 http://www.aba-agroecologia.org.br/aba/ [visited on 24/08/2012] 25 http://agroeco.org/socla/ [visited on 24/08/2012] claim their space on the streets. The main goal is to promote the bicycle as a environmentalfriendly and sustainable transport system. To achieve it, the action reclaim the creation of favorable conditions for the use of the vehicle, especially in urban areas, in order to integrate cyclists on mobility planning. Other goals are to promote the culture of the bicycle; to educate drivers (motorized and cyclists) regarding a peaceful and cordial behavior in traffic. Besides those central goals, several objectives that follow local needs, can take place once decided by the participants. No leaders or statutes leads to different ways of demonstrations, according to the participants of each location or event. Among the plurality of motes, the motto “one less car” is used to create empathy and greater respect of motor vehicles that saturate the streets of big cities. Another raised slogan is “We are the traffic”, which makes clear to motorists that cycling is another component of urban mobility that needs to be consider. One registered serious attempt against the critical mass took place in Porto Alegre in February of 201126. A car run over 100 participants, wounding 25 of them. Almost 100 cities in Brazil participate monthly and disastrous events are unfortunate exceptions. The idea is to celebrate the occupation of the streets, promote harmony in spaces that belongs to everyone. 2.5 - Children Consumerism In Brazil, the debate concerning child consumerism has been animated by Alana Institute, a civil society organization that coordinates the Child and Consumption Project, which goal is to increase public awareness about childhood consumerism and advocates for the regulation of marketing communication directed to children. As a result of this infant publicity the institute identifies: high rates of violence in youth, childhood obesity, early sexualization, family stress and other problems27. There is also the group Free Childhood Consumerism28 that is a collective of mothers, fathers and citizens that demonstrate the ineffectiveness of Brazilian self-regulation 26 http://bicicletada.org [visited on 25/08/2012] 27 http://defesa.alana.org.br/post/29103602505/alanadefesa [visited on 28/08/2012] 28 http://infancialivredeconsumismo.com [visited on 28/08/2012] advertising industry that instead of worrying about the health and well-being of children, serve to the interests of the sector. They argue, therefore, that the state must intervene in this matter. Debates surrounding this issue have been promoted in Brazil during the year 2012. For example, the side event Children Consumerism, Advertising and Sustainability sponsored by Alana Institute, as part of the program of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20). Two other events were the 1st Seminar Free Childhood Consumerism, conducted by the Commission on Human Rights and Minorities of the House of Representatives and the public hearing Children's Advertising Regulatory provided by Bill 5921/2001" promoted by the Federal Attorney for Citizens' Rights. These events had a partnership with other organizations such as the Alliance for Childhood (Aliança pela Infância), the Federal Council of Psychology (Conselho Federal de Psicologia), the Brazilian Institute for Consumer Defense (Instituto Brasileiro de Defesa do Consumidor – IDEC) and Akatu Institute. The main debate on children's advertising's agenda is the approval of Bill 5.921, currently under consideration in the House of Representatives. This bill will prohibit any type of advertising and marketing communication: addressed to the child through any medium or media, whether products or services related to childhood or related to teen and adult audience; on medium or media intended for children; on television, on the internet or radio fifteen minutes before, fifteen minutes after and during children's programming or programming whose audience is mostly children and; prohibit the child's participation in any type of advertising or marketing communications29. 3 – Critical, scientific and intellectual production Critical and intellectual scientific publications directed specifically on Degrowth are rare in the country because the word “Degrowth” still out of the Brazilian range of concepts and because it happens elsewhere from 29 Substitute of Bill nº 5.921/2001 (Substitutivo ao Projeto de Lei nº 5.921/2001), House of Representatives http://www.camara.gov.br/proposicoesWeb/fichadetram itacao?idProposicao=397962 [visited on 28/08/2012] the mainstream economic scene and the everyday life of population in general. In the other hand opinion articles, interviews, critical essays can be found on Internet but it would be impossible to describe them accurately and fairly in this paper. It is in academia that Degrowth territory seems to be more fertile. We could find from undergraduate to post-graduate works dealing specifically the issue. 3.1 – Summary of Scientific and Academic Production Until now we have identified only two post-graduate studies who has degrowth as an object of study. One such research is being developed by researcher Ana Flávia Bádue 30 as a student in the Graduate Program in Social Anthropology from the Faculty of Philosophy Literature and Humanities, University of São Paulo (FFLCH/USP). This research aims to analyze the emergence of political ecology in France in the 1970s and articulate this moment with the contemporary degrowth movement, paying particular attention to how non-European countries are faced by European movements. Another master research is being developed by Alan Boccato-Franco by the Graduate Program in Sustainable Development at the University of Brasilia (Unb). In this study the author aims to identify the fundamentals of the different strands of degrowth around the world and establish relationships between them and the idea of Buen Vivir present in some Latin American countries. We also found some publications in academic journals or events such as: Nascimento & Gomes (2009) that address the core features of a set of works and authors related to the décroissance movement and others who inspired them or deal with the same subject without necessarily taking part in the movement; Violante & Silva (2010) dealing specifically with the degrowth in that present an overview of information and data from Brazil, and from other countries, in order to contextualize the unfeasibility of the economic growth model; Garran & Ikeda (2007), in his essay entitled "décroissance: fact or fad?" he suggest a reflection about the trend of social awareness in the matter of consumer because of the existence of French movement la décroissance as well as similar movements in Brazil. 30 Personal contact made on 02/21/2010 with Ana Flavia Bádue 3.2 – Summary of Books and Others Publications and Articles Also for the published books released in Brazilian Portuguese the examples are scarce. The first example we can cite is the translation of Serge Latouche's (2009). “Petit traité de la décroissance sereine”. A very recent publication, “Facing the Limits to Growth”, organized by Philippe Lena and Elimar Pinheiro do Nascimento (2012) is the first and only book about degrowth written to be published in Brazil. This book bringing together authors from Brazil, Uruguay and Europe, writing about the issues related to development associate to the critique of economic growth. The organizers were aware that it would be a challenge in such country, where the economic policies, oriented to the development patterns of the older industrialized countries, determines the entire social and political spheres. Distancing from the strict term “degrowth” we can find a wider range of Brazilian publications that touch the subject: “Limits to Growth: The 30-year Update”, the update of the original Club of Rome report translated by Prof. Pachoa Celso Roberto and Maria Isabel Castro (Meadows et al, 2007); “The Nature as Limits to Economy - Contributions of Nicholas GeorgescuRoegen” is the publication in the form of a book, from the scientific work of Andrei Cechin (2010); “Ecoeconomics - A new approach” by the economist Hugo Penteado (2003). There are four articles by Serge Latouche published in the IHU Ideas Books, "The Degrowth and the Sacred", "Conviviality and degrowth", "Is degrowth the good news of Ivan Illich?" and "The degrowth as a condition of a convivial society" (Latouche, 2006, 2012a, 2012b, 2012c). Besides these, there is an article by Joan Martinez Alier, “Economic degrowth socially sustainable”31, translated into Portuguese and socialized by Latin American Information Agency-ALAI. 3.3 – Academic actions Besides the written work a few 31 MARTINEZ-ALIER, Joan (2009), “Decrescimento econômico socialmente sustentável”. http://decrescimentobrasil.blogspot.com.br/2010/11/dec rescimento-economico-socialmente.html [visited on 20/08/2012] introductory courses have take place in Brazil. As example, those promoted by the Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Studies in Complexity of the University of Southwest Bahia (UESB). In 2011, the first year of the course, the theme was “Introduction to the Culture of Degrowth”. As highlights the historian Carlos Alberto Pereira Silva, professor ministering and organizing the courses, “it have attracted the interest of many people that, when realizing the existence of multifaceted crisis generated by a predatory 'developmentalism', exclusionary and consumerism, they see in Degrowth an alternative to civilization, needed in our time”. Participants of these courses come from different areas of knowledge and experiences and according to Professor Carlos Alberto, “they have achieved success in spreading the values, principles and ideals of Degrowth movement”. Very recently in 2012, in the same campus of Vitória da Conquista of UESB, it was launched another course carrying the title “Sustainable degrowth”. Further, Carlos Alberto explains that academic debates around Degrowth are “mostly requested by Professors in Economics and Management and some discussions are already underway in major Brazilian universities with the aim of bringing students closer to most recent discussions and issues in terms of management and governance”32. According to him, these debates culminated on the invitation of Serge Latouche to visit and speak for academicians; and thus, the perception that part of Brazilian Academia have “embraced the Degrowth as who recognizes a remedy for a very serious evil”. In November of 2011 Latouche present Degrowth in some of the most important and innovative universities in the country as Federal University of Mato Grosso (Cuiaba - MT), SAF/CEPAT (Curitiba - PR) and the University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos - Unisinos (Campus Porto Alegre - RS). 4 – Public Manifestations and Meetings To include Degrowth on a political speech in Brazil is a very challenging task and probably doesn't garner much votes as we conclude by the Brazilian political struggle to maintain infinite economic growth. Therefore, it is worth highlighting the effort of the current senator of 32 Briefing of the “Sustainable Degrowth” Course specially written as contribution to this paper. the Federal District (Brazil), Cristovam Buarque, responsible for the permanent sub-committee of the Earth Summit (RIO +20), to organize debates related to degrowth themes during 2011 and 2012. In September 2011 a public hearing specifically on Degrowth was hosted by Léna Philippe, Carlos Alberto Pereira and Joao Luiz Homem de Carvalho, which later would integrate the Brazilian Network for Sustainable Degrowth (RBDS) in the Senate. On March 29th of the following year, another public hearing was held on the topic “Superfluous Consumption” and hosted by Edson Franco, also from the RBDS. In his speech during the opening of the International Society for Ecological Economics Conference held in Rio de Janeiro in June of 2012, the senator questioned about who and what might grow, mentioning degrowth movement and the main issues and ideas defended in contrast to the green economy of Rio+20. Moreover, this Senator defended the degrowth in speech in the tribune of the Senate33, and he released an article about the degrowth in that assumed to be inevitable that the idea of happy-degrowth will win adherents, spread and be accepted34. The existence of the virtual group, allowed the integrated participation on the international event “Global Pic-Nic for Degrowth” designed and very active in the Northern hemisphere. In 2010 this event attracted people from over 70 cities and 20 countries to meet and discuss the proposals of Degrowth. On June 5th, 2011, Brazil timidly participated for the first time, with small groups organized in Brasilia, Rio de Janeiro, Sao Paulo and the South region. 5 – Virtual environment In order to facilitate the communication, access to academic texts in portuguese and to encourage debate around degrowth, the interaction and communication between some existing blogs in Brazil resulted on the creation of a discussion and study groups around degrowth. It started to be organized in a national network by April, 2011. People from across the country were invited or joined the virtual mailing group hosted on the YahooGroups web tool, which allowed and facilitated the exchange of news and information 33 Pronouncement of 25 October 2010, Senate. http://www.senado.gov.br/atividade/pronunciamento/det Texto.asp?t=385896 [visited on 20/08/2012] 34 Fat and growth (Gordura e Crescimento). http://oglobo.globo.com/pais/noblat/posts/2010/11/20/g ordura-crescimento-342296.asp [visited on 20/08/2012] among people who were interested on the subject. A year later, the same initiative gain the social networks such as Facebook35 and Cirandas36 (the Brazilian solidarity economy network). Currently the mail group has 166 active people and over 600 on Facebook. Since its start, the group exchanged more than 2360 messages (170 messages per month in average) and gathered a notable material for studies and insights on the topic. Other Internet-hosted tools, such as virtual meeting rooms and shared networked environments, include other siblings movements, enable the co-creation of documents and texts and help the connecting people from this continental dimensioned country in a more lively way. 6 – Brazilian Network for Sustainable Degrowth Perhaps two of the more recent discussed subjects in the virtual group was the formalization (or not) of the group. It started with the idea of structuring a formal association in order to create visibility and to materialize, somehow, the movement in Brazil. Its interest was precisely to connect with groups, associations and individuals that question the globalization of the dominant social and economic systems, gathering, creating and promoting concrete field actions that attempts to build post-growth societies or organize actions for this end. Nevertheless, the formal structure wasn't consensually accepted and thus, a few people from the group decided to create an informal network in order to organize actions, firstly to integrate the Earth Summit events and further, national meetings and support local initiatives. The first national meeting took place in Rio de Janeiro on June 19th, 2012, gathering during a half-journey event more than 60 people from at least 5 different countries37. Among them, representatives and contributors from the Research&Degrowth Association, the Brazilian Transition Towns, the French ATTAC%, the 35 https://www.facebook.com/groups/decrescimento .brasil/ 36 http://cirandas.net/decrescimento 37 http://decrescimentobrasil.blogspot.com.br/2012 /06/encontro-sobre-o-decrescimento-na.html [visited on 20/08/2012] project for an International Degrowth Network and several other projects from the solidarity economy, besides academicians, Professors and even politicians. During the meeting, followed by a brief historical of the group, the creation of the Brazilian Network for Sustainable Degrowth (RBDS) was announced. A few participants of the meeting also met for the global demonstration organized on the first day of the official UN event. The first collective action after the Rio+20 events was to write a Intentions Letter with the summary of the main orientations expressing a few important agreed positions the adherents would care and seek for. These guidelines are: • that human society must be inspired by the principles and practices of solidarity and cooperation, equitable distribution of natural and economic resources, direct and participatory democracy, the continuous search for balance between autonomy and heteronomy on an ecological and sociable way and Libertarian education for all; • the “Sustainable Degrowth” is a matrix of alternatives, guided by principles and practices that seek to build a human society which goals are related to a good life for all, focusing on equitative and solidar human relations and in balance with the biophysic environment of which mankind is a part; • that under the scope of degrowth are the initiatives that explicitly contribute in overcoming the unlimited economic growth society's, which is based on consumerism; • • • • • Thus, the intentions of RBDS are: to develop a program of practices and communication targeting the transition to such proposed society; to contribute to the understanding and practical translation of the definition and meaning of sustainable degrowth, as well as its dissemination; to be a space for articulation and convergence of initiatives working to the proposed transition; to implement and systematize concrete practices for transition; to identify, articulate, inspire, learn, share and cooperate with individuals, organizations, institutions, collectives, movements and networks that share similar ambitions; • • • • to participate in spaces of collective construction of the proposals for a society that meets the principles above; to promote trainings, debates and meetings on the topic of sustainable degrowth; to generate, analyze, qualify and share strategic information to the viability of actions favorable to the construction of the proposed society; to contribute and join an international articulation for sustainable degrowth; 7 – Integration to other committed groups Degrowth issues derives basically on the assumption that humanity shall achieve a life style based on minimal energy consumption once the energy crisis is imminent and humanity resilience to such crisis is, by now, barely existent. In order to plan such society, one path is the collective organization for managing the transition. The RBDS assumes that liberating the collective wisdom it is possible to draw richer lifestyles, more pleasant and resilient, away from the actual development model. Rafael Reinher38, member of RBDS, proposes the “use of open source communication and the integration of alternatives, owned by no one or by a huge coalition of networks and movements” and to “find tasks and objectives that can be organically shared between initiatives”. The proposed integration to other committed groups would involve, for instance, from local initiatives on solidarity-based economy, to an International Degrowth Network, as well as the link between theory and praxis, activism and academia, in order to increase visibility and open a honest dialogue among different fronts. 8 – Conclusions and Final Remarks The Brazilian initiatives that explicitly assume degrowth, and the convergent elements that were found in the five groups and social movements discussed in this paper suggest that the idea of degrowth is not exotic to Brazil. Rather, part of its elements have already been implemented and defended by some social groups that have relevant capacity to articulate, 38 Presentation on the 1st Brazilian Degrowth Meeting on June, 19th, 2012 in Rio de Janeiro. besides to already existing government and private institutional apparatus for implementing some actions that have synergies with degrowth. Therefore, we suggest that the answer to the question of wether degrowth is suitable for developing or emergents countries must be found in the analysis of the principles and practices already present in organized social groups in these countries. We suggest degrowth as an “umbrella” movement promoting the transition towards a desirable post-capitalistic, post-growth and postproductivist society must start leaving lexical and superfluous differences and debates in order to gather strong participation of different currents of actions. It is of great importance to recognize those initiatives that work locally and acknowledge that these colleagues initiatives can only offer strength to the global community that henceforth build the solutions for the multifaceted crisis of our time. Another main point to develop is to build an infrastructure which permit synchronous communications between networks and further, defining collaboratively the main tags that matter for the various movements in order to share a free and open data for spreading the alternatives fitting to multiple needs and ideals. These are remarks that could turn to result on few flexible terms of governance between movements and networks. From our point of view, degrowth partisans are likely to be open and embrace the all that already begun to build on the ruins of sustainable development and the “green-growth”, to show that there are several paths to achieve a sane future to humanity. The converging elements identified in this article suggest the desirability of further studies to identify more precisely the synergies between social actors in this study and the "degrowth supporters". Finally, we suggest some questions that may guide future researches, such as: How can degrowth contribute to a convergence process of different sectors of Brazilian society? What degrowth can add to the process of identifying elements that connect the various social movements of the Brazilian countryside and city, from different economic levels, agendas, among others, that somehow are struggling to overcome the many social and environmental problems facing today? Acknowledgements: Carlos Alberto Pereira, Daniel Tygel, Isabela Motta Cardoso, Philippe Léna and Rafael Reinher. References: BOCCATO-FRANCO, Alan A (2012) “O decrescimento no Brasil”. In: Enfrentando os limites do crescimento: sustentabilidade, decrescimento e prosperidade .1 ed. p. 269288. Rio de Janeiro. Garamond. BRASIL (2012), “Decreto nº 7.794 de 20 de agosto de 2012”. DOU. Section 1, nº 162, pages 4-5, 21 august, 2012. BRASIL (2006), “Decreto nº 5.811, de 21 de Junho de 2006”. DOU. Section 1, nº 162, pages 4-5, 22 june, 2006. CECHIN, Andrei Domingues (2010), “A Natureza como Limite da Economia: a contribuição de Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen”. São Paulo. SENAC São Paulo/Edusp. GARRÁN, Vanessa Gabas; IKEDA, Ana Akemi (2007), “La décroissance: realidade ou modismo?” In: X Semead, Volume 10, São Paulo. GILMAN, Robert. The Eco-Village Challenge: The challenge of developing a community living in balanced harmony - with itself as well as nature - is tough, but attainable. In: Living Together, 29 (Summer 1991) p. 10. HOLMGREN, David (2007) “Essence of Permaculture – A summary of permaculture concepts and principles” from “Permaculture Principles & Pathways Beyond Sustainability” E-book online: http://www.holmgren.au [visited on 20/09/2011] KALLIS, Giorgos (2010), The Degrowth Propositions and Research Questions, 2nd international conference on economic degrowth for ecological sustainability and social equity, March 26-29, 2010, Barcelona, Spain KOVEL, Joel; LÖWY, Michael (2001) An Ecosocialist Manifesto in http://ecosocialistnetwork.org/?page_id=10 [visited on 01/09/2012] LATOUCHE, Serge, (2012a), “O decrescimento e o Sagrado.” In: Cadernos IHU idéias, year 10, n. 168, São Leopoldo.LATOUCHE, Serge (2009), “La apuesta por el decrecimiento ¿Cómo salir del imaginario dominante?”. Issue 2. Icaria editorial. Barcelona, Spain. LATOUCHE, Serge, (2012b), “Convivialidade e decrescimento.” In: Cadernos IHU idéias, year 10, n. 166, São Leopoldo. LATOUCHE, Serge, (2012c), “Será o decrescimento a boa nova de Ivan Illich?” In: Cadernos IHU idéias, year 10, n. 164, São Leopoldo. LATOUCHE, Serge (2009), “La apuesta por el decrecimiento ¿Cómo salir del imaginario dominante?”. Issue 2. Icaria editorial. Barcelona, Spain. LATOUCHE, Serge (2006), “O decrescimento como condição de uma sociedade convivial.” In: Cadernos IHU idéias, year 4, n. 56, São Leopoldo. LÉNA, Philippe; NASCIMENTO, Elimar Pinheiro do (orgs.) (2012), “Enfrentando os Limites do Crescimento: sustentabilidade, decrescimento e prosperidade.” 1 ed. Rio de Janeiro. Garamond. MARTINEZ-ALIER, Joan (2012), “Environmental Justice and Economic Degrowth: an Alliance Between Two Movements” in “Capitalism Nature Socialism” Volume 23, Issue 1. MEADOWS, Donella; MEADOWS, Dennis; RANDERS, Jorgen (2007), “Limites do Crescimento: A atualização de 30 anos”. Rio de Janeiro. Qualitymark. NASCIMENTO, Elimar Pinheiro do; GOMES, Gisella Colares (2009), “Décroissance: qual a consistência?” VIII Meeting of Brazilian Society for Ecological Economics, Cuiabá. PENTEADO, Hugo (2003), “Ecoeconomia: uma nova abordagem”. São Paulo. Lazuli. VIOLANTE, Adriano de Cerqueira; SILVA, Amarildo Jorge da (2010), “Decrescimento econômico: um ensaio crítico” State University of West Paraná (UNIOESTE). Revista ADMpg.
© Copyright 2024