Why should we use delay-based congestion control? Delay-based Congestion Control for Low Latency

Why should we use delay-based
congestion control?
Delay-based Congestion Control
for Low Latency
The delay signal is:
I
I
I
David Hayes <davihay@ifi.uio.no>
David Ros <David.Ros@telecom-bretagne.eu>
I
requires no special signal
May also aid in using available capacity more quickly
Ideally:
25 - 26 September 2013, London
I
This work has been funded by the European Community under its
Seventh Framework Programme through the Reducing Internet
Transport Latency (RITE) project (ICT-317700)
¯ RITE)
David Hayes & David Ros (UiO & IMT w
A measure of the quantity we are trying to reduce
A fundamental characteristic of packet switched networks
DBCC for Low Latency
25–26 September 2013, London
1/6
A measurement based CC that tries to keep latency low
∴ congestion control for low latency,
SHOULD include delay as A congestion measure.
¯ RITE)
David Hayes & David Ros (UiO & IMT w
DBCC for Low Latency
25–26 September 2013, London
2/6
Why is delay a difficult signal to use?
Delay Measures
0.115
0.11
Measures:
0.105
I
TRTT
I
TOWD
I
usually interested in Tq , but requires TRTT_min or TOWD_min
I
but with multi-path TOWD or TRTT maybe just as important as Tq
I
gradient or change in delay
I
...
0.1
0.095
0.09
340
350
360
370
380
390
400
410
420
430
time (s)
OWD signal
Dealing with Noise:
¯ RITE)
David Hayes & David Ros (UiO & IMT w
DBCC for Low Latency
25–26 September 2013, London
3/6
Raw / probabilistic – collective behaviour matters
I
Filtering: mean, median, exponential, kalman
¯ RITE)
David Hayes & David Ros (UiO & IMT w
DBCC for Low Latency
25–26 September 2013, London
4/6
Delay based CC for:
Loss based (LB) congestion control and delay based (DB) congestion
control do not coexist well
I
LB tries to fill the queues
I
DB tries to keeps them small
I
homogeneous systems (e.g. data centres)
I
Scavenger class traffic
I
small buffers
incentives for deploying DBCC
I
Hybrid two-state methods
I only reduces delay in the long term
I
Reverse path (RTT)
I
A way forward
Coexistence?
I
I
I
I
I
(as loss based flows disappear)
long term is still important!
perhaps policing
isolation of delay-based flows
in combination with other signals (such as ECN)
DBCC is not THE solution, but should be PART of the solution
¯ RITE)
David Hayes & David Ros (UiO & IMT w
DBCC for Low Latency
25–26 September 2013, London
5/6
¯ RITE)
David Hayes & David Ros (UiO & IMT w
DBCC for Low Latency
25–26 September 2013, London
6/6