1. No category

4/29/2014
Why Frisco ISD’s $775 million bond is a bad deal for taxpayers | Dallas Morning News
Why Frisco ISD’s $775 million bond is a bad deal for taxpayers
83
15
0
Share
1
38
AA
By JESS FIELDS
Published: 27 April 2014 08:18 PM
Updated: 27 April 2014 08:31 PM
The Dallas Morning News recently ran a story about how Frisco ISD’s $775 million bond proposal is facing significant opposition and
skepticism from the community. This shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone who has noticed Texans’ weariness of ever-increasing debt
and taxes.
While most Texans clamor for putting the brakes on runaway government spending and debt, Frisco ISD has put its foot on the gas pedal.
And it could end up costing taxpayers big-time.
Property owners in Frisco ISD could see a noticeable tax increase should the district’s bond package succeed. If the bond is approved,
the average homeowner could see a tax increase of $206.40 per year, based on Frisco ISD’s own estimates that its average home value
is $272,801. This piles on more taxes on top of the state’s above-average per person property tax burden, ranked as the 15th-highest in
the nation.
Admittedly, Frisco is a fast-growing school district; but its debt load is already enormous and this large, new debt could max out the
district’s debt service tax rate entirely, rendering it incapable of borrowing in the near future.
Frisco ISD has borrowed nearly $1.4 billion on the backs of taxpayers. And that doesn’t include interest, which is estimated at over $1.2
billion. Combine the principal and interest amounts owed, and the district’s total outstanding debt burden is nearly $2.6 billion, or about
$55,988 per student enrolled.
Among adjacent large districts, only Denton approaches this level of debt per student, at $41,671. Even then, Frisco’s total debt burden
per child is over $14,000 higher than Denton’s — and that, of course, doesn’t account for the $775 million of new debt.
Assuming a reasonable interest rate of 4 percent over 30 years, the interest owed on $775 million principal could be as much as $556
million. Adding this estimated new debt total of $1.3 billion to the existing debt total of $2.6 billion increases the district’s total debt to over
$3.9 billion. Under this scenario, the district’s total debt per student would be a whopping $84,781.
Frisco is expecting an additional 19,795 students to enroll between the current 2013-14 school year and the 2020-21 school year, and
these are the students that the bond’s capital improvements are intended to accommodate. The bond costs $67,289 per new student.
Not all of the money is going toward building new schools, however. Among other things, over $103 million is earmarked for a
combination of technology upgrades, vehicle purchases, surveillance cameras and conservation measures.
In other words, a portion of this debt is intended to pay for short-term expenses — something to avoid in public and personal finance.
Technology, in particular, has a notoriously short life cycle, needing upgrades every few years. Voters should be asking themselves
whether it is prudent to add debt in this way.
The short-run projects and the massive amount of total debt only come into clearer focus when you consider the effect on the tax rate and
Frisco’s bonding capacity.
Frisco ISD projects that when all bonds are issued by the 2020-21 school year, the interest and sinking (I&S), or debt service portion of
the tax rate, will be maxed out at $.50 per $100. In other words, after the bonds from this $775 million authorization are issued, Frisco
may not be able to issue any more for quite some time.
What will Frisco ISD do then, when they no longer have the bonding capacity to build truly needed capital projects?
Maxing out its bonding capacity and exploding its debt to close to $4 billion is not prudent fiscal management — and the effect on
taxpayers will be noticeable.
Rather than rubber-stamping the district’s $775 million bond package, Frisco taxpayers should demand that the district work within
existing budgetary constraints — just as Texas families do — and employ concepts like zero-based budgeting to help find efficiencies
that can be redirected to meet the district’s needs.
Adding a big pile of new debt to an already steep mountain of debt is not the right answer.
Jess Fields is a senior analyst with the Center for Local Governance at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, a nonprofit free-market
http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/latest-columns/20140427-why-frisco-isds-775-million-bond-is-a-bad-deal-for-taxpayers.ece
1/8
4/29/2014
Why Frisco ISD’s $775 million bond is a bad deal for taxpayers | Dallas Morning News
Jess Fields is a senior analyst with the Center for Local Governance at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, a nonprofit free-market
research institute based in Austin. He may be reached at jfields@texaspolicy.com.
Did you see something wrong in this story, or something missing? Let us know.
We recommend
Growing Burger Chain
Embraces Tablet Apps
to Scale
How to Buy a House
When You Already Own
One
(Tech Page One)
(Trusted Choice)
Lindsay Lohan
Arrested on Stage
During 'Saturday Night
Live'
Monologue
(Yahoo!
Screen)
10 Mega Stars Who
Are Secretly Horrible
People
(Celebrity Gossip Answers)
Recommended by
From the web
More from Dallasnews.com
Saying "No" And Not Thinking "Grow" Will Hurt The GOP USAToday
5 vie to fill Dallas ISD’s District 6 seat after Carla Ranger retires News
What Is the Minnesota Minimum Wage? Patriot Software
Cowlishaw: After Mavericks' Vince Carter treats Dallas to euphoria Saturday,
Stars serve up opposite Sports
Smart key, pretty dumb Tech Page One
Jail time an example of liberty and justice for some Opinion
Recommended by
Comments
To post a comment, log into your chosen social network and then add your comment below. Your comments are subject to our Terms of
Service and the privacy policy and terms of service of your social network. If you do not want to comment with a social network, please
consider writing a letter to the editor.
Write a comment
38 Comments
Sort Subscribe RSS
Sharon Sykes
2 days ago
He stated the current debt per student without the bond is $56k per student - and it is $14k higher than
any neighboring school district. Curious why that doesn't scare you?
Like Reply Share 5 replies
8
Tracy Gamble
3
1 day ago
It doesn't scare me because I understand the difference between debt and deficit. Frisco is
growing faster than, not just our neighboring school districts, but any district in the _country_.
We have literally been the fasting growing district for the last ten years. People are coming
because they want to live here and they like our schools. We don't get to opt out of educating
students (despite what some bond detractors have indicated they would prefer).
Frisco ISD has superior bond ratings from Standard & Poor and Moody's. We have won every
award you can get for fiscal responsibility, stewardship, accountability. FISD was 1 out of only 14
to receive the Platinum Award from the Texas Comptroller for responsible fiscal management -out of 1038 districts in the state.
Yes, the bond number is high. But we need the schools, and we've proven that we can
responsibly manage the debt. There isn't an alternative that doesn't create overcrowding.
Like Reply Share 4 replies
Tom
2
8
1 day ago
Tracy, sounds like you love the taxes, enjoy!
Like Reply Share 3 replies
Tracy Gamble
4
3
22 hours ago
"Tom", do you live in Frisco ISD? Or are you just one more outsider trying to tell
FISD parents and voters how to live their lives? Just curious...
Like Reply Share 2 replies
viper_76262
1
1
21 hours ago
Tracy,
I have lived in Frisco since 2006 and am sick at what I
see the district doing. I have two children in the FISD and we moved
here for the long term. I will not have an oligarchy or politicians and
their cronies in the inner circle hijack this city and turn it into
http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/latest-columns/20140427-why-frisco-isds-775-million-bond-is-a-bad-deal-for-taxpayers.ece
2/8
4/29/2014
Why Frisco ISD’s $775 million bond is a bad deal for taxpayers | Dallas Morning News
their cronies in the inner circle hijack this city and turn it into
Detroit.
Somehow that "free" public education is going to be $68K
per student while the administrators have that fancy new admin
building??
The days of disengaged voters is over. It is a mission of mine to
smoke these people out. Maybe you are one of these people?
Like Reply Share 1 reply
Tracy Gamble
1
1
18 hours ago
viper_76262, if you live here, then you would know what your
actual tax bill from FISD is, yes? Therefore you know full well
that it is not actually $68K per student, thanks to our strong
corporate tax base and strategic booming growth.
I welcome your new participation as an engaged voter, and I
encourage you to investigate one of the city's fine civic
engagement programs like City Hall 101 or Leadership
Frisco, so you can learn about how government gets funded
and where our tax dollars go. Don't fall for the wild-eyed
rhetoric of people like Jess Fields and Matt Armstrong.
Like Share
Joe Silk
1
1
1 day ago
Watch out!!! Big money deals means big money payoffs and corruption opportunities.
Plus. Frisco has been reported to abuse free speech of protestors.
Vote no to taxes, always.
Like Reply Share
José
5
1
1 day ago
here is an idea.... FRISCO is big enough already... So stop all home building permits.. ESPECIALLY
APARTMENTS!!... then wait a few of years for the student population to level off.. After you get the
financials back in black (little AC/DC there), then the city should SLOWLY allow new construction.. but only
on new homes... no more apartments...
Like Reply Share 2 replies
JulieB
5
1
1 day ago
That's easy to say. First, understand that I'm not defending this bond program.
The Frisco ISD includes land in Plano, McKinney, and Little Elm. If that land isn't built out, Frisco
can't step in and beg them to stop building. We saw this happen in Plano when single-family
homes sprung up in former pastures and farmland in neighboring cities that were part of the
district. The east side of Plano was already near build-out at the time. It took years for the district
to catch up and get enough schools in place. I don't blame the PISD for that (though I have
problems with they way they managed the massive overcrowding in existing schools).
If I were moving to Frisco (or any high-growth city), I'd be very careful to look at the broader area
surrounding my home. If I had kids, and that land in nearby cities was undeveloped, I'd be wary
about potential overcrowding. If I didn't have kids (or sent them to private school), I'd still be wary
about property values in the event I had to sell up during a period when the schools were
overcrowded.
Frisco may be facing a similar dilemma. At the very least they can look to Plano and hopefully
avoid some of the mistakes made here in managing overcrowding in schools.
Like Reply Share 1 reply
viper_76262
3
0
21 hours ago
Julie,
The ISD can still buy the land now with $37MM. Nothing prevents that so your Plano
scenario will not happen in FISD.
Like Reply Share
harry balz jr
1
0
1 day ago
We all know Frisco is growing by leaps and bounds but it's a HUGE
mistake to keep increasing our property taxes. Frisco ISD was part of
the brain trust that gave millions to Jerry Jones and now they want to
increase our taxes? Personally, I'd like to see the growth slow down as
it takes away from the value of living here. Who wants more traffic,
more people and higher taxes?
Like Reply Share 2 replies
Tom
6
2
1 day ago
http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/latest-columns/20140427-why-frisco-isds-775-million-bond-is-a-bad-deal-for-taxpayers.ece
3/8
4/29/2014
Why Frisco ISD’s $775 million bond is a bad deal for taxpayers | Dallas Morning News
Tom
1 day ago
Right Harry, wait until all the secret city council approved free taxes kick in for Jerruh Jones, along
with Exide, the people of Frisco are getting hosed. The city council must all ne Democrats with
their motto "everyone else's money, just not mine"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Like Reply Share
VK
2
1
22 hours ago
From what I read, all the funding for for this JJ venture is coming through sales taxes and from
Jones himself. If that's true, it's a pretty good deal for Frisco.
Like Reply Share
Joe Palmer
1
1
1 day ago
How much property tax will the city be collecting from Jerry Jones and the Dallas Cowboys?
Like Reply Share
harry balz jr
3
0
1 day ago
BTW if you thought that all these new fancy office towers are going to help pay for FISD in a material
manner ... think again. Read this article from the DMN http://www.dallasnew​
s .com/business/busin​
essheadlines/201404​
26-tax-law-leads-to-​
towering-savings-for​
-big-building-owners​
.ece
Like Reply Share
Michael
5
2
2 days ago
"What will Frisco ISD do then, when they no longer have the bonding capacity to build truly needed capital
projects?" Like what?
Like Reply Share
Norton Rosenthal
3
0
18 hours ago
Problem is, the article does not
pass the smell test. Frisco is growing,
and growth means providing public schools.
As Frisco’s population increases, the earnings and wealth of its
population increases, local spending increases, the economic base expands, reducing the impact of the
property taxes that
provide good schools and that help integrally to propel the community forward…
Like Reply Share
VK
3
1
22 hours ago
Personally, I think Frisco's education model is superior to the one HUGE high school concept of Allen or
some others. Class sizes are much smaller with neighborhood type schools and participation in extracurricular activities is greatly enhanced for every student.There's no free lunch for education and with the
state reducing funding at every opportunity, the taxpayers of Frisco will have to decide if they want to
maintain this excellence in education or not.
Like Reply Share
Samantha Geiring
2
0
20 hours ago
http://www.friscoi​
s d.org/news/2013/08/​
13/cowboys-partnersh​
ip
Not even a year ago ... "Frisco ISD will contribute $30 million to the project, or
1.2 million annually for 25 years. The money will come from an existing revenue
stream generated by a Tax Increment Financing District.
The City of Frisco will contribute $30 million; the Frisco
Economic Development Corporation, $30 million; and the Frisco Community
Development Corporation, $25 million. The Cowboys will be responsible for any
cost overruns.
“This is another example of how great things happen when
people come together to collaborate and partner for the good of the community,”
said FISD School Board President Renée Ehmke. “The economic impact of this
project will be phenomenal, but the varied experiences provided to our students
due to this partnership will be unparalleled. We could not be more excited.”
No
increase in property or sales tax rates for the FISD, City, FEDC or
FCDC is projected."
REALLY????????????​
????????????????????​
?????????????????? @Tracy Gamble @Sharon
Sykes @JulieB @Alvin Huerta @Jay Cutcher @VK @syndymelbourn​
e @Joe Silk
Like Reply Share
1
0
http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/latest-columns/20140427-why-frisco-isds-775-million-bond-is-a-bad-deal-for-taxpayers.ece
4/8
4/29/2014
Like Reply Share
Why Frisco ISD’s $775 million bond is a bad deal for taxpayers | Dallas Morning News
harry balz jr
1
0
12 hours ago
8 Months ago they approved the Cowboys Training Facility while most people were on vacation right
before school started. Conveniently, it made the newspaper Thursday and they voted on it on either
Monday or Tuesday if I recall correctly. At that time we heard ... "No increase in property or sales tax rates
for the FISD, City, FEDC or FCDC is projected." I didn't trust them then and I don't trust them now. I live
here and am tired of the taxation without appropriate representation.
Here's the link ... http://www.friscoisd​
.org/news/2013/08/13​
/cowboys-partnership​
"Frisco ISD will contribute $30 million to the project, or 1.2 million
annually for 25 years. The money will come from an existing revenue
stream generated by a Tax Increment Financing District. The
City of Frisco will contribute $30 million; the Frisco Economic
Development Corporation, $30 million; and the Frisco Community
Development Corporation, $25 million. The Cowboys will be responsible
for any cost overruns.
“This is another example of how great
things happen when people come together to collaborate and partner for
the good of the community,” said FISD School Board President Renée
Ehmke. “The economic impact of this project will be phenomenal, but the
varied experiences provided to our students due to this partnership will
be unparalleled. We could not be more excited.”
No increase in property or sales tax rates for the FISD, City, FEDC or FCDC is projected." @Alvin
Huerta @Jay Cutcher @Joe Palmer @Joe Silk @John Classe @JulieB @Norton
Rosenthal @Sharon Sykes @Tracy Gamble @donsanedrin ​
Like Reply Share
Matt Armstrong
0
0
24 hours ago
Folks look around at WHO is making the personal attacks on this board, Tracy Gamble, who is a paid
consultant for the Special Interest PAC supporting the bond. (I work in politics and am a capitalist so not
at all against someone making money or even a living doing that, though I am strictly a volunteer (and a
donor) to our PAC. Attacking individuals personally is a progressive tactic, a la saul alinsky, instead of
touting the benefits of why this massive bond should pass overwhelmingly. It is very unbecoming! You
can learn more information about our group opposed to the bond at www.responsiblespend​
ingcoalition.org and we have videos up explaining our opposition and explaining why we believe people
should vote AGAINST this massive bond. We also have the campaign finance reports posted for all to
see, and the next one is due this Friday, and we encourage FISD to make them available, and for
everyone to see that our group has NOT taken on cent from anyone other than Frisco citizens, and their
group has taken HUGE money from Special Interests who stand to make 10's of millions of dollars off of
the building of elaborate school buildings.
Like Reply Share
Matt Armstrong
3
3
1 day ago
Be sure to read and SHARE the article that was posted this morning about FISD. This is truly explosive
and shocking information that every voter needs to read and hear the audio / watch the video. From taking
Obama stimulus funds that add to the debt, to the MYSTERY of the missing elementary schools that
taxpayers have already paid for, to the misrepresentation of the way that Frisco ISD has used Gimmicky
Financing (Capital Appreciation Bonds) from Dr Lyon. (this audio begins at the 31:52 mark of the audio),
this is really a very disturbing article.
http://www.breit​
bart.com/Breitbart-T​
exas/2014/04/28/Fris​
co-ISD-to-Decide-on-​
Adopting-775m-Debt-I​
nitiative
Like Reply Share 1 reply
Tracy Gamble
3
3
22 hours ago
Keep begging people to SHARE it, Matt. The only shares you've had on your Big Atomic Bomb on
FB appear to be from yourself and people who don't live in FISD or even DFW. You'd be wise to
start mitigating your losses at this point. Face the facts that Frisco ISD residents and voters just
aren't buying the snake oil you're selling.
Like Reply Share
donsanedrin
1
1
19 hours ago
This seems like a rather conservative argument, but it is presented in such a practical and logical way
that I agree with just about all of it.
There's a difference between investing quality money in schools, and just plain ole overspending. It
seems like Frisco had already overspent inefficiently on schools previous to this new bond.
For Frisco, its almost as if its a marketing tool to help attract higher class families to move to that town.
They probably have these huge expensive schools and fancy facilities.
They probably could afford the tax increase, given that the average household makes over six figures, but
those on the lower end will definitely be squeezed out. And if the estimate projections do not turn out to
be correct, then the existing Frisco residents will find themselves holding a very expensive sack of
potatoes.
http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/latest-columns/20140427-why-frisco-isds-775-million-bond-is-a-bad-deal-for-taxpayers.ece
5/8
4/29/2014
Why Frisco ISD’s $775 million bond is a bad deal for taxpayers | Dallas Morning News
Wouldn't surprise me if those rich Frisco residents move on to the next trendy suburb, or even back within
the trendier parts of Dallas within the next 10 years. Who wants to be paying high county taxes when
they're children graduate?
Like Reply Share
Alvin Huerta
1
2
23 hours ago
FYI readers:
John Classe was a staunch supporter of putting Arts Hall
bond debt on Frisco tax payers backs and as Frisco’s representative on the Arts Hall board, he made a
pro-bond/hall vote in defiance of the wishes of the Frisco City Council. His wife serves on Frisco ISD’s
Bond Committee. By the way, everyone on that committee has much to answer for considering the
grossly inflated school construction costs presented. It appears to have been simply a “Yes” committee
stacked with minions. A REAL bond committee needs to be assembled before the horses get out of the
barn.
Classe raising the growth issue is just an expected diversion from the real issues of debt and excess.
Everybody knows Frisco is one of the fastest growing cities in the US and that new schools will be
needed. Duh! Opponents are simply calling for a more fiscally responsible package to be presented.
(Remember that name in case he tries to secure a seat on the City Council.)
Tracy Gamble is the domain registrar for the pro-bond PAC Frisco Schools First and their first campaign
finance report shows her receiving $4,000 as a "consultant". Not that there is anything wrong with that.
I'm just letting you know who you are hearing from.
I live in a sliver of Frisco in Lewisville ISD known as The
Swath. LISD just shot through $697.7 million in less than six years and more money is needed. It was
not spent even close to the original bond proposal. In part, they financed short-term assets (iPads) with
long term debt and it looks like FISD is set to do the same thing. Crazy! You can read about LISD’s bond
misdeeds at WeAreFrisco.org. (I am proud to be one of the founders.)
Frisco ISD voters: Be afraid. Be very afraid!
Like Reply Share 1 reply
Tracy Gamble
1
2
22 hours ago
Alvin, thanks for the promotion! When WAF ("what a foul-up") and ITS tired angry rhetoric... and
the Frisco Tea Party and ITS tired angry rhetoric... get defeated yet again, my phone will ring
thanks to you and Matt constantly telling everyone everywhere how I'm the one consulting on
communications for the pro-bond PAC. With enemies like this, who needs advertising? (But no,
you don't get a sales commission.)
Like Reply Share
Tracy Gamble
1
1
2 days ago
Oh look -- another misleading, fear-mongering opinion from the 25-year-old Austin special interest
mouthpiece who doesn't live in Frisco ISD, doesn't have children here, doesn't own a home here, doesn't
pay taxes here, can't even vote here. (But hey, he came to town a couple times! He knows what's best for
your schools.)
Magically, now the bond costs $67,289 per student. Of course that math is derived from the projected
NEW students... and they are refusing to account for the other ~45,000 kids already here. Nor are they
accounting for all the graduated kids whose parents still live here (and are still paying taxes into the
system).
Instead, the bond opponents want you to mistakenly believe that somehow, each *student* carries that
obligation. Which of course is false. It's like saying that my child in my house owes 1/3 of the mortgage
because she happens to live under the roof. SMH.
Just keep on throwing those big scary numbers at Frisco ISD residents. I look forward to watching the
number continue to climb; soon they'll be handing out flyers at gas stations saying debt per student is
ONE SCRILLION dollars.
Fortunately, Frisco ISD residents are smart enough to listen to the people we trust. And we also know the
difference between debt and deficit.
Like Reply Share 6 replies
syndymelbourne
4
7
1 day ago
so b/c we dont live there
anything stated, any money from others outside Frisco is a not good??
REJECT THE BOND
SEC8 WILL RUIN YOU
Like Reply Share 1 reply
5
4
http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/latest-columns/20140427-why-frisco-isds-775-million-bond-is-a-bad-deal-for-taxpayers.ece
6/8
4/29/2014
Why Frisco ISD’s $775 million bond is a bad deal for taxpayers | Dallas Morning News
Like Reply Share 1 reply
Tom
5
4
1 day ago
Ha ha, betcha Frisco has minimal section 8.
Like Reply Share
Jay Cutcher
0
1
1 day ago
You're fine with long term debt for short term expenditures??? That portion of the story is very
telling in itself and makes me question the whole package.
Like Reply Share 1 reply
Slim Whitman
8
1
1 day ago
Jay,
I agree fully. That's a flashing red-light to me.
Like Reply Share
Slim Whitman
5
1
1 day ago
Tracy Gamble,
Good grief. No one thinks each student is responsible for his pro-rata share of district debt. It's a
way to quantify the amount of debt versus the size of the district.
No matter what you say or how you spin it as the piece above mentioned using long term debt
instruments to pay for short term obligations is a seriously bad move. Dying third world
governments do this. Argentina has done this two or three times right before their economy
collapsed each time I might add.
The $67,289 figure is the allocated bond cost per estimated new student by 2021. That's
information that clearly came from the district itself.
Like Reply Share 1 reply
Tracy Gamble
7
2
1 day ago
"It's a way to quantify the amount of debt versus the size of the district." - Yes, and our
district is the fastest-growing in the nation.
FISD has answered the short-term debt question a million times. See for
yourself. http://ww​
w.friscoisd.org/bond​
2014/faq#15
The short-term debt gets paid off first, but by rolling it into one package, they save on
fees from the financing. Additionally, paying for buses, etc within I&S frees up more
money in the M&O budget, which can be used for teacher salaries, curriculum, and the
like.
Like Reply Share
John Classe
1
4
1 day ago
Wow… A lot of numbers to digest there. I will add a few of my own. Frisco ISD, my district, has
approximately 46,000 students presently and expects to add 20,000 more in the next SIX years. That is a
43% increase! Frisco ISD has over 50 campuses today. This bond proposition will pay for just 14 more.
14 more campuses to house a 43% increase in student population. Sure, these are big $ figures, but so
is the explosive growth we are experiencing. You encourage voters to vote no? Where do you propose
we house these students? Naysayers are really good at simplifying complex problems, but saying no
won’t solve them.
Like Reply Share 4 replies
Matt Armstrong
2
6
24 hours ago
With all due respect John, you were also a big proponent of the Arts of Collin County, which
would have been a boondoggle had it not been voted down by the people. After that, when you
were appointed to the Board, you went against the wishes of those who appointed you, and the
people in Frisco who voted 52.7% against it in 2011, to keep it alive. Your wife was on the bond
review committee. Not sure you are the most objective observer here. Just sayin! P.S. I
appreciate you and your wife's service to the city, but we disagree on this one.
Like Reply Share 3 replies
Tracy Gamble
2
2
22 hours ago
Matt -- tsk tsk. Another sad red herring from the leader of a tiny angry mob. Hey -- we
missed you at the Frisco Lakes brunch today. Your leader Tom Fabry crashed the
private event uninvited... why not you too?
Like Reply Share
1
1
http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/latest-columns/20140427-why-frisco-isds-775-million-bond-is-a-bad-deal-for-taxpayers.ece
7/8
4/29/2014
Why Frisco ISD’s $775 million bond is a bad deal for taxpayers | Dallas Morning News
Like Reply Share
John Classe
1
1
22 hours ago
Matt, we are certainly allowed to disagree. But my support for this proposition is no less
valid than yours just because my wife spent six months in committee vetting it. You
want to get things done in this town? Spend some time on the front end instead of
constantly saying "no" in the 11th hour. It's harder that way, but it gets results.
Finally, your accounting of my
service to the city is incorrect. I was, in fact, asked to stay on by our elected officials after
my term expired. Sound like an action that would have been taken if I "went against the
wishes of those who appointed" me? But feel free to continue diverting attention from
the matter at hand.
Like Reply Share
Tracy Gamble
1
1
21 hours ago
Unbelievable. Not 10 minutes ago, you whined and waved your hands in the air like a
little kid over on FB because I asked whether you had a student in the FISD school
district. So it's low for me to bring up something relevant about your family, but it's not
low for you to bring up the family member of another person when it suits your political
argument. Seriously, you are such a flaming hypocrite.
Like Reply Share
1
0
http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/latest-columns/20140427-why-frisco-isds-775-million-bond-is-a-bad-deal-for-taxpayers.ece
8/8