Sample Problem 3/3 (Rectilinear Motion) The 250-lb concrete block A is released from rest in the position shown and pulls the 400-lb log up the 30° ramp. Plot the velocity of the block as it hits the ground at B as a function of the coefficient of kinetic friction μk between the log and the ramp. Let μk vary between 0 and 1. Why does the computer not plot results for the entire range specified? Problem Formulation The constant length of the cable is L = 2sC + sA (see figure). Differentiating this expression twice yields a relation between the acceleration of A and C (note that aC = aLOG). 0 = 2a C + a A (1) From the free-body diagram for the log [ΣF y = ma y = 0 [ΣFx = ma x ] ] N − 400 cos(30) = 0 μ k N − 2T + 400 sin(30) = 400 aC 32.2 Substituting N yields, 400μ k cos(30) − 2T + 400 sin(30) = 400 aC 32.2 (2) From the free-body diagram for block A [↓ ΣF = ma] 250 − T = 250 aA 32.2 (3) Maple will be used to solve the three equations above for aA, aC and T in terms of μk. Since the accelerations are constant, v A2 = 2a A d where d is the vertical distance through which block A has fallen. Thus, the velocity of A when it strikes the ground (d = 20 ft) is v Af = 40a A Maple will automatically substitute aA yielding the required expression relating vAf and μk. Maple Worksheet > restart; Digits:=5: > eqn1:= 0=2*aC+aA; eqn1 := 0 = 2 aC + aA > eqn2:= 400*mu[k]*cos(theta)-2*T+400*sin(theta)=400/32.2*aC; eqn2 := 400 μk cos ( θ ) − 2 T + 400 sin( θ ) = 12.422 aC > eqn3:= 250-T=250/32.2*aA; eqn3 := 250 − T = 7.7640aA > theta:=30*Pi/180: > soln:=solve({eqn1,eqn2,eqn3},{aA,aC,T}); soln := { aA = −15.935 μk + 13.800, aC = 7.9675 μk − 6.9000, T = 142.86 + 123.72 μk } Note that the accelerations may be either positive or negative depending on the value of μk . The largest value of μk for which the block will move up can thus be found by solving the equation aA=0 for μk . This yields μk = 13.8/15.935 = 0.866. > assign(soln); > vAf:=sqrt(2*aA*20); vAf := −637.40μk + 552.00 > plot(vAf,mu[k]=0..1, labels=["mu_k"," "], title="vB (ft/sec)"); Note that results are not plotted beyond the limiting value for μk (0.866) that was determined above. From a numerical point of view this occurs because Maple will not plot imaginary answers. Whenever imaginary or complex values result there is usually some physical explanation. In this problem, the physical explanation is that the log will not slide up the incline if the coefficient of friction is too large.
© Copyright 2024