1. No category

Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Annexure: A(i)
(Paragraph 1.5.3)
STATEMENT OF THE STATE-WISE SAMPLE SELECTION
(ARWSP)
1
Name of the
State
Name of selected
districts
Names of selected
divisions/
blocks/units
Andhra
Pradesh
East Godavari
Kakinada
Krishna
Nalgonda
Karimnagar
Warangal
Srikakulum
2
Arunachal
Papumpare
N u m b e r Year of L o c a t i o n C o s t o f Expenditure
of schemes approval of scheme S e l e c t e d i n c u r r e d
selected
( b l o c k , Schemes
village and ( i n R s
habitation) c r o r e s )
10
0.77
Rajahmundry
Vijayawada
Gudivada
Nalgonda Division
I
Nalgonda Division
II
Karimnagar
Manthani
Warangal
Hanamkonda
Srikakulum
Palasa
10
10
11
10
0.60
1.17
1.46
0.66
10
0.70
10
10
11
12
10
11
1.15
0.50
0.45
0.66
1.55
1.49
Yupia
11
2.20
65
1.94
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Pradesh
3
Assam
Lower Subansiri
West Siang
East Siang
Changlang
West Kameng
Ziro
Along
Pasighat
Changlang
Bomdila
11
14
11
14
11
1.91
0.96
1.59
3.55
5.38
1.90
0.97
1.60
3.59
5.39
Barpeta
Barpeta PHE
Division
Bongaigaon PHE
Divn
Silchar PHE Divn I
Silchar PHE
Division-II
Haflong PHE
Division
Maibong PHE
Division
Tezpur PHE
Division-I
Tezpur PHE
Division-II
Goalpara PHE
Division
3
0.79
0.79
2
0.36
0.41
2
3
0.20
0.44
0.43
0.96
2
0.19
0.06
2
0.06
0.04
2
0.14
0.14
2
0.17
0.24
1
0.27
0.27
Bongaigaon
Cachar
N.C.Hills
Sonitpur
Goalpara
66
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
4
Bihar
Patna (East)
Samastipur
Motihari
Sasaram
Ara
Bhagalpur
Muzaffarpur
Sheikhpura
Biharsharif
5
Chhattisgarh
Raipur
Jagadalpur
Korba
Ambikapur
6
Gujarat
Banaskantha
Junagadh
Kachchh
Panchmahal
Sabarkantha
-
Danta
Palanpur
Junagadh
Manavadar
Mandvi
Mandvi
Lunawada
Santrampur
Kadana
Idar
Prantij
67
7
11
7
8
5
4
5
3
6
4.21
10.84
6.70
7.78
4.03
2.84
3.34
0.78
4.27
2.49
6.26
4.96
7.66
3.80
2.06
1.54
0.60
2.11
10
20
14
-
2.77
3.08
2.87
4.78
2.32
3.07
3.41
2.34
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
13.79
1.52
35.72
18.94
12.49
1.81
10.24
7.39
1
1
2.88
2.24
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
7
Haryana
Valsad
Pardi
Valsad
1
1
2.29
2.02
Sirsa
Kaithal
Sirsa-II
Sirsa-I
Jind
Fatehabad
Gohana
Sonepat
Kaithal
10
10
10
11
11
10
10
3.17
5.10
3.42
4.94
9.15
3.32
2.78
Bilaspur
Bilaspur
10
3.91
Ghumarwin
Nahan
Paonta Sahib
Rampur
Shimla-I
10
10
1
7
10
6.16
2.21
0.39
0.83
5.52
Akhnoor
10
7.67
Samba
Rajouri
Nowshera
Baramulla
Sopore
10
10
10
10
10
8.89
6.08
7.08
7.85
7.33
Jind
Fatehabad
Sonipat
8
Himachal
Pradesh
Sirmour
Simla
9
Jammu and
Kashmir
Jammu
Rajouri
Baramulla
68
3.08
3.49
3.13
4.76
5.54
1.85
2.41
Most of the
schemes
were not
approved.
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
10
Jharkhand
Pulwama
Shopian
Awantipura
10
10
18.55
8.57
Godda
Bokaro
Dhanbad
Ranchi
Godda
Tenughat
Dhanbad
Ranchi West
Khunti
Garhwa
Jamshedpur
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
7.62
2.33
3.92
3.44
3.19
3.90
4.96
Belgaum
Bailhongal
Gulbarga
Alland
Surpura
Yadgir
Kanakpura
Doddaballapur
Chickballapur
Chintamani
Kolar
Koppal
Gangavathi
Bellary
Siruguppa
4
2
5
5
2
1
5
6
3
3
5
15
5
5
5
0.21
0.01
0.33
0.25
0.10
1.98
0.28
0.41
0.07
0.07
0.26
73.24
0.28
0.21
0.13
Garhwa
East Singhbhum
11
Karnataka
Belgaum
Gulbarga
Bangalore-Rural
Kolar
Koppal
Bellary
69
6.50
1.80
3.34
3.20
2.98
2.28
3.51
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Shimoga
Shimoga
Sagar
5
5
0.29
0.30
12
Kerala
Ernakulum
Muvattupuzha
Piravam
Kottayam
Kottayam
Thiruvananthapuram Nayyattinkara
Attingal
Thrissur
Irinjalakkuda
Thrissur
5
6
9
10
10
9
7
12.95
22.39
8.73
25.06
29.24
23.09
26.31
13
Madhya
Pradesh
Rajgarh
10
1.41
10
1.06
10
0.95
10
1.38
Jabalpur
Raisen
Khargone
Rajgarh
Khilchipur
Sarangpur
Jabalpur
Patan
Panagar
Shahpura
Sihora
Obedullaganj
Begumganj
Udaipura
Khargone
Kasrawad
Bhikangaon
70
11.92
5.87
12.76
8.31
19.73
9.03
19.89
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Shahdol
Seoni
Chhindwada
Sagar
Katni
Bhopal
14
Maharashtra
Ahmednagar
Amravati
Gondia
Barwaha
Maheshwar
Sohagpur
Gohparu
Budhar
Beohari
Keolari
Barghat
Parasiya
Pandhurna
Chhindwara
Jamai
Sagar
Khurai
Rahatgarh
Mudwara
Rithi
Vijairaghogarh
Phanda
Berasiya
ZP Ahmednagar
MJP Ahmednagar
ZP Amravati
MJP Amravati
ZP Gondia
71
10
1.78
2
0.32
10
0.58
10
3.10
10
1.05
8
NA
10
10
10
10
10
3.54
149.12
2.32
10.01
0.08
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Jalna
Nandurbar
Raigad
Satara
Thane
15
Manipur
Ukhrul
Imphal East
Bishnupur
16
Meghalaya
East Khasi Hills
(capital)
East Khasi Hills
West Khasi Hills
MJP Gondia
ZP Jalna
MJP Jalna
ZP Nandurbar
MJP Dhule
ZP Raigad
MJP Panvel
ZP Satara
MJP Satara
ZP Thane
MJP Thane
10
10
10
10
6
10
10
10
10
10
9
86.11
1.88
11.75
1.08
9.98
2.52
20.51
1.89
21.76
3.22
32.39
Ukhrul PHE
division
Imphal East PHE
division
Bishnupur PHE
division
10
0.57
48.42
10
1.90
355.49
10
1.46
128.63
PHE Investigation
Division
PHE Hills Division
PHE Electrical
Mawphlang
Division
PHE Nongstoin
Division
10
4.38
3.71
7
10
1.78
14.36
1.78
14.36
10
5.35
5.35
72
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
West Garo Hills
East Garo Hills
17
Nagaland
Dimapur
Peren
Kohima
18
Orissa
Balasore
Rayagada
Gajapati
Kalahandi
Koraput
Puri
Dhenkanal
Sambalpur
Mawkyrwat
Division
PHE, Tura
Division
PHE, Tura North
Division
PHE, Resubelpara
Division,
Williamnagar
PHE, Simsangiri
Division,
Williamnagar
10
3.76
3.82
9
3.77
3.77
9
2.40
2.40
5
3.32
4.24
5
1.94
1.44
Store Division
Sanitation Division
Peren
Kohima
2
3
1
4
0.69
1.33
0.58
1.30
RWSS Division,
Balasore
Rayagada
Gajapati
Kalahandi
Koraput
Puri
Dhenkanal
Sambalpur
10
5.76
10
6
9
10
8
10
10
1.19
1.24
1.55
1.19
10.90
2.74
1.83
73
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
19
Punjab
Ropar
Patiala
Ludhiana
Nawanshahar
20
Rajasthan
Ajmer
Banswara
Barmer
Bikaner
Dausa
Rajsamand
Ropar
Mohali
Patiala
Rajpura
Ludhiana
Nawanshahar
9
10
10
10
5
10
3.01
2.11
2.74
1.86
0.49
1.78
Beawar
Bisalpur Project
Division-II, Ajmer
Bisalpur Project
Division-III,
Bhinay
Banswara
North Division,
Barmer
RIGEP Division,
Barmer
District Division-I,
Bikaner
District DivisionII, Bikaner
Dausa Division
Bagheri ka Naka
Project Division,
Nathdwara
10
8
0.16
108.05
10
6.76
10
10
0.23
5.85
10
2.00
10
21.66
10
6.58
10
7
4.03
92.73
74
1.61
1.42
1.80
1.81
0.41
1.12
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Sikar
Sriganganagar
21
Sikkim
East District
South District
Rajsamand
Neem Ka Thana
Division
Sikar Division
Anoopgarh
District Division,
Sriganganagar
Suratgarh
10
10
7.48
0.37
10
10
10
0.80
3.28
2.49
10
5.78
Gangtok
Rongli
Jorethang
Namchi
10
10
10
10
0.38
0.63
0.63
0.66
22
Tamil Nadu
Nilgiris
Coimbatore
Erode
Karur
Thanjavur
Villupuram
Tiruvannamalai
Vellur
Udhagamondalam
Coimbatore
Erode
Karur
Thanjavur
Villupuram
Tiruvannamalai
Vellur
9
4
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.55
0.19
0.38
0.48
0.58
0.75
0.45
0.32
23
Tripura
South Tripura
PHE-VII
PHE-III
PHE-VI
10
10
10
1.40
1.70
1.34
West Tripura
75
10.20
9.83
22.69
13.79
14.71
29.41
16.45
18.01
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
24
Uttar
Pradesh
Lucknow
Raebareilly
Agra
Hardoi
Sonebhadra
Sant Ravidas Nagar
Meerut
Moradabad
Deoria
Allahabad
Unnao
PHE-IV
10
1.16
Construction
Division II
Construction
division I
Construction
Division II
Nil
Construction
Division I
UNICEF Division
Construction
Division I
Construction
Division I
Construction
Division I
Construction
Division I
Construction
Division
Construction
Division VI
Construction
Division II
Construction Unit
5
0.02
5
0.02
5
0.02
Nil
5
0.03
3
5
0.03
0.02
5
1.08
5
0.03
1
0.01
2
0.37
2
0.71
5
3.74
Nil
76
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Barabanki
Gonda
Etawah
Bareily
Kushinagar
Baghpat
25
Uttarakhand
Pauri Garhwal
Chamoli
Tehri
Champawat
Dehradun
26
West Bengal
South 24-Parganas
Construction
Division
Construction
Division
Construction
Division
Construction
Division VI
Construction
Division
Construction
Division
5
0.02
5
0.42
2
0.70
5
0.04
5
0.57
5
0.87
Srinagar Branch
Pauri Branch
Gopeshwar Branch
Ghansali Branch
Chamba
Champawat
Purori
Dehradun
27
16
22
44
10
10
10
24
801.78
411.52
729.68
1501.63
258.52
187.96
534.22
1511.15
Gosaba
Mathurapur –I
Mathurapur –II
Patharpratima
1
2
1
2
1.94
1.14
0.87
2.47
77
1.94
1.13
1.00
1.94
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Bankura
North 24 Parganas
Paschim Medinipur
Falta
Kakdwip
Kulpi
Khatra-II
Sarenga
Taldangra
Sonamukhi
Saltora
Onda
Simlipal
Gangajalghati
Raipur-I
Bankura-II
Sandeshkhali-I
Basirhat-II
Bongaon
Bagda
Basirhat-I
Deganga
Gaighata
Gobipallavpur-II
Binpur-I
Ghatal
Kharagpur-II
Pingla
Sankrail
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
78
0.98
2.38
1.13
1.72
1.06
0.72
0.35
1.35
1.44
0.90
2.52
0.86
0.77
1.86
1.70
0.88
0.53
0.76
3.34
4.99
0.56
1.39
0.64
0.77
0.89
0.60
0.98
2.23
1.10
0.49
0.53
1.13
0.56
2.27
3.01
1.21
2.51
0.75
0.77
1.84
1.73
1.32
0.81
1.29
3.34
5.42
0.56
1.37
0.64
0.77
0.89
0.69
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Malda
Nayagram
Garbeta-III
English Bazar
Chanchal-II
HarishchandrapurII
Gajole
Ratua-I
Harishchandrapur-I
Manikchak
79
2
1
1
1
2
1.19
1.13
6.91
1.28
1.54
0.94
1.13
3.89
1.28
1.54
1
2
1
1
0.99
23.39
0.98
3.79
0.99
1.47
1.00
1.01
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
ANNEXURE: A (ii)
(Paragraph 1.5.3)
STATEMENT SHOWING THE STATEWISE SAMPLE SELECTION
(SWAJALDHARA)
S.No.
Name of the State
Name of the District
Name of the Scheme selected
1
Andhra Pradesh
East Godavari
Krishna
Nalgonda
Karimnagar
Warangal
Srikakulam
11 PWS Scheme to VWSC
10 PWS Scheme to VWSC
10 PWS Scheme to VWSC
14 PWS Scheme to VWSC
11 Swajaldhara Schemes for VWSC
11 Swajaldhara Schemes for VWSC
Cost of selected Expenditur
scheme
e incurred
(Rs. in crore)
1.29
1.41
1.77
1.31
0.54
1.32
2
Arunachal Pradesh
East Siang
Papumpare
West Siang
Changlang
West Kameng
Lower Subansiri
2
3
4
2
1
1
0.09
0.15
0.32
0.21
0.13
0.13
3
Assam
Barpeta
Bongaigaon
Cachar
2 schemes
2 schemes
4 schemes
80
0.47 0.030
0.50 0.014
0.80 0.038
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Goalpara
4
Bihar
2 schemes
Hajipur
Biharsharif
Sheikhpura
Muzaffapur
Bhagalpur
Ara
Sasaram
Motihari
Samastipur
Patna
5
Chhattisgarh
Raipur
Jagadalpur
Korba
Ambikapur
81
0.11 0.004
2 PWS
0.56
349 Handpumps
3.44
4 PWS
2 Handpumps
3 PWS
0.90
0.74
0.81
3 Handpumps
0.59
1 PWS
Nil
10 PWS
9 PWS
1.74
Nil
4.41
0.90
1 Handpump
0.08
5 PWS
Nil
3 PWS
2.00
Nil
0.94
3 Handpumps
0.44
19
20
28
18
0.48
0.24
1.22
0.05
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
6
Gujarat
Banaskantha
Junagadh
Sabarkantha
Valsad
2 Water Supply Schemes
2 Water Supply Schemes
3 Water Supply Schemes
3 Water Supply Schemes
0.45
0.25
0.11
0.34
7
Haryana
Kaithal
Sonipat
10
10
0.82
0.78
8
Himachal Pradesh
Bilaspur
Solan
Nahan
10
8
8
0.35
0.42
0.95
9
Jammu and Kashmir
Jammu
Rajouri
Baramulla
Pulwama
5 Water Supply Schemes
12 Water Supply Schemes
8 Water Supply Schemes
12 Water Supply Schemes
2.65
0.95
1.46
1.78
10
Jharkhand
East Singhbhum
Dhanbad
Godda
Garhwa
Ranchi
Bokaro
10 PWSS
2 PWSS
5 PWS S
2 PWSS
7 PWS S
2 PWSS
1.42
0.07
0.47
0.13
0.40
0.14
11
Karnataka
Bangalore-Rural
10
0.52
82
1.02
0.02
0.29
0.11
0.18
0.10
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Belgaum
Bellary
Gulbarga
Kolar
Koppal
Shimoga
10
11
13
11
5
10
0.79
8.10
0.53
0.99
0.28
0.20
10 Water Supply Schemes
10 Water Supply Schemes
8 Water Supply Schemes
13 Water Supply Schemes
1.83
1.45
0.98
0.84
12
Kerala
Thiruvananthapuram
Kottayam
Ernakulum
Thrissur
13
Madhya Pradesh
Rajgarh
Jabalpur
Raisen
Khargone
Shahdol
Seoni
Chhindwada
Sagar
Katni
Bhopal
10 schemes
10 schemes
10 schemes
10 schemes
5 schemes
10 schemes
10 schemes
10 schemes
5 schemes
5 schemes
0.07
0.53
0.79
0.20
0.09
0.18
0.37
0.31
0.42
0.03
14
Maharashtra
Ahmednagar
Amravati
Gondia
10
10
10
0.97
2.75
0.94
83
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Jalna
Nandurbar
Raigad
Satara
Thane
10
10
10
10
10
1.50
0.90
2.38
1.35
1.28
Swajaldhara not implemented in the state
15
Manipur
16
Meghalaya
Ri-bhoi
Sector Reform Pilot Project
9.75
17
Nagaland
Dimapur
Kohima
Peren
5 schemes
1 scheme
1 scheme
0.43
0.11
0.11
18
Orissa
Puri
Sambalpur
Koraput
Gajapati
Dhenkanal
Kalahandi
Balasore
Rayagada
5 Piped Water Supply Schemes
8 Piped Water Supply Schemes
5 PWSS
5 PWSS
8 PWSS
7 PWSS
4 PWSS
6 PWSS
0.004
0.006
0.003
0.003
0.008
0.005
0.003
0.002
19
Punjab
Fatehgarh Sahib
Patiala
Ropar
3 Water Supply Schemes
2 Water Supply Schemes
4 Water Supply Schemes
84
0.63 0.38 crore
0.50 0.30
0.85 0.58
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Banswara
Barmer
Bikaner
Dausa
Rajsamand
Sikar
Sriganganagar
10
10
2
6
10
10
6
0.24
7.97
1.68
0.69
1.29
1.58
1.01
20
Rajasthan
21
Sikkim
22
Tamil Nadu
Coimbatore
Erode
Namakkal
Salem
Thanjavur
Sivagangai
Madurai
Villupuram
6
8
8
8
6
8
8
8
0.27
0.35
0.17
0.21
0.29
0.80
0.65
0.37
23
Tripura
South Tripura
West Tripura
7
7
0.16
0.10
24
Uttar Pradesh
Allahabad
Barabanki
Bareilly
Mini/Single Pipe Water Supply
Mini/Single Pipe Water Supply
Mini/Single Pipe Water Supply
2.46
1.64
2.43
Swajaldhara not implemented in the state
85
3.36 crore
3.63
0.80
1.49
0.71
2.86
3.37
2.47
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Bijnor
Chandauli
Lucknow
Mirzapur
Moradabad
Pratapgarh
Sonebhadra
Varanasi
Mini/Single Pipe Water Supply
Handpump/Mini Pipe Water Supply
Handpump/Mini Pipe Water Supply
Mini/Single Pipe Water Supply
Mini/Single Pipe Water Supply
Handpump/Mini Pipe Water Supply
Handpump/Mini Pipe Water Supply
1.51
0.50
0.38
1.60
1.00
0.62
0.61
1.33
*
25
Uttarakhand
Almora
Champawat
Dehradun
Pithoragarh
Tehri Garhwal
2
5
2
4
3
0.23
0.33
0.21
0.28
0.27
26
West Bengal
Malda
Paschim Mednipur
North 24 Parganas
Bankura
South 24 Parganas
9
10
10
10
10
0.62
0.86
1.65
0.84
0.51
*
: At Mirzapur, Rs 75.12 lakh and Rs 85.15 lakh was received during 2004-05 and 2005-06 respectively, but till date no scheme was started.
86
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
ANNEXURE: B
(Paragraph 2.4.2)
Statement showing amount of delayed release of Central funds:
(Rs in lakhs)
State
Central fund
Chhattisgarh
9214.74
Gujarat
275.7
Himachal Pradesh
42.79
Karnataka
12424.09
Kerala
154.8
Nagaland
7109.24
Rajasthan
5289.95
Uttarakhand
2064.12
West Bengal
42473.33
Total
79048.76
87
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Annexure C
(Paragraph 2.5)
State-wise Analysis of slip back
Andhra
Pradesh
The number of PC habitations increased by 7329 between April
2003 and April 2004. However, during the updation of habitation
status in February-March 2007, 12951 habitations were reported as
slipped back from FC. This was reportedly due to increase in
population, migration of labour from one place to another, and
variation in ground water levels.
Assam
In nine test-checked divisions, there were 4066 slip back
habitations during the period 2002-07, which occurred due to poor
maintenance, quality problems etc. However, the figures reported
for the State as a whole indicated no slip back between April 2002
and April 2007, thus casting doubts on the reliability of these
figures.
Bihar
On the basis of the habitation survey of 1993-94, as of April 2002,
all habitations were reported to have been covered. However, as of
1 April 2004 (based on 2003 Survey Data), out of the total of
105303 habitations, there were only 32911 FC habitations (31 per
cent), 44930 PC habitations and 27462 NC habitations.
Chhattisgarh The status of FC Habitations as per the new survey in 2003, and as
per Departmental figures of April 2003, revealed a slip back of
7674 FC habitations, reportedly due to sources becoming dry/
quality affected out of service due to choking and filling and some
tribes moving periodically from place to place.
However, no
detailed analysis of slip back was provided to audit.
Gujarat
The status of FC Habitations as on 1 April 2003 and 1 April 2004
revealed an increase in PC and NC Habitations of 8386 and a slip
back in 3810 FC habitations, which was reportedly due to quality
problems, and depletion of water resources.
88
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Himachal
Pradesh
The status of habitations identified during 1993-94, and the data
revealed by the 2003 survey reveals slip back of 18204 FC
habitations.
This was reportedly due to change in norms for
conduct of the survey, emergence of new habitations owing to
increase in population, and decrease in discharge of water sources.
Jammu &
Kashmir
Out of the total 11184 habitations as per CAP 99, there was a slip
back of 1629 FC habitations into 224 PC and 1405 NC habitations
between CAP 99 and the 2003 Survey.
Karnataka
A comparison of the status of habitations as of April 2001 and
April 2003 revealed slip back of 11585 FC habitations.
Kerala
A comparison of the status of habitations of Departmental figures
as of 1 April 2005, and figures based on Survey 2003 data
indicated a slip-back of 423 FC habitation.
Madhya
Pradesh
The status of FC Habitations as on 1 April 2003 and 1 April 2004
revealed slip back of 36,470 FC habitations.
Maharashtra In Maharashtra, in the report to GoI of NC/ PC habitations as of 1
April 2005, there was under-reporting of 1851 NC and 21250 PC
habitations; this was attributed to the fact that the Survey 2003
figures and figures collected from Zilla Parishad representatives
did not match
Nagaland
The status of habitations as on 1 April 2002, and new status as per
Survey 2003 data revealed slip back of 429 FC habitations.
Orissa
The status of habitations as on 1 April 2002, and as on 1 April
2005 (as per Survey 2003 data) revealed slip back of 4614 FC
habitations.
Rajasthan
The status of FC Habitations as on 1 April 2004 and 1 April 2005
revealed slip back of 37,759 FC habitations
Further, 65329 habitations out of the total 122250 habitations were
without adequate drinking water as of March 2007, of which 30088
were quality affected habitations.
89
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Sikkim
The status of FC Habitations as on 1 April 2004 and 1 April 2005
revealed slip back of 138 FC habitations.
Uttar
Pradesh
The status of FC Habitations as on 1 April 2004 and 1 April 2005
Uttarakhand
The status of FC Habitations as on 1 April 2003 and 1 April 2004
revealed slip back of 10167 FC habitations.
(based on Survey 2003 data) revealed slip back of 10062 FC
habitations.
Survey 2003 also showed that out of 4719 sources of water supply
schemes, discharge of water flow of 805 sources had declined by
more than 50 per cent. By 2005, out of 5818 water supply schemes
handed over to Jal Sansthan for O&M, there was a reduction of
water discharge in 1981 schemes, of which the decline was 50 to
75 per cent in 1290 schemes.
Further, a household survey by Peoples’ Science Institute (PSI) in
6 Districts revealed that 81 per cent of 791 households reported
access to Government pipelines, but this source provided 67 per
cent of the summer requirement and 75 per cent of the winter
demand. Further, according to the survey, SC/ST households were
placed at a disadvantage, as fewer received more than 40 lpcd, a
higher fraction received only 11 to 20 lpcd, and the difference was
large in four out of six Districts.
West Bengal
The status of FC Habitations as on 1 April 2003 and 1 April 2004
(based on Survey 2003 data) revealed slip back of 10650 FC
habitations.
The main reasons for slip back were sinking of tube wells in
arsenic affected areas without taking appropriate mitigation
measures, and non-maintenance/ inadequate maintenance of
existing tube wells, which were becoming defunct or yielding less
water.
90
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Annexure: D
(Paragraph 2.5)
Statement showing the difference of habitation figures between DDWS and State level
figures
Variation of 10,000 habitations or more (Total) in data – (State level figures – DDWS)
Name of the State
Chhattisgarh
Jharkhand
Madhya Pradesh
Orissa
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
As of Ist April
2005
2006
22396
22396
20054
20054
16683
16683
27269
27269
28304
28304
15156
15156
16602
16602
17229
17229
2004
22396
20054
16683
--15156
-17229
2007
-20054
16683
27269
28304
15156
16602
17229
(Source: Data collected from DDWS and Implementing agencies in the State)
Variation of 5,000 or more habitations in PC data- (State level figures – DDWS)
As of 1st April
Name of the State
Andhra Pradesh
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Gujarat
Jharkhand
Madhya Pradesh
Orissa
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
2004
36663
44930
12412
9404
5555
31376
-13335
35877
-13797
25103
2005
34198
44325
11389
8552
-28249
13085
17159
32314
18776
13650
22197
2006
25290
44519
9378
7561
-22113
11535
7228
25670
17160
13345
19749
2007
32739
36850
-6005
-14840
9908
-29241
8060
12044
17063
Source: Data collected from DDWS and Implementing agencies in the State
91
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Variation of more than 500 habitations in NC data (State level figures – DDWS)
Name of the State
Andhra Pradesh
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Jharkhand
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
2004
1651
27462
14471
15357
19486
1624
-2849
-9283
6949
-5488
9528
As of Ist April
2005
2006
1535
7673
27452
26247
11793
6791
13369
11771
14035
7694
--18798
9284
2701
3087
62913
61894
3224
968
6914
6731
7993
7034
5207
5121
6835
6540
2007
6255
18486
--1777
-3344
2848
60029
-6411
2790
4766
6187
(Source: Data collected from DDWS and Implementing agencies in the State)
92
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Annexure E
(Paragraph 2.8.2)
Details of non-submission of returns
Annual Returns
Return
Annual progress report
for clearance of schemes
Annual report of
achievements under the
programme during the
year
District-wise break up of
MNP provision and
ARWSP allocation
Due Date for
Submission
By 31 October
and 30 April
By 30th April of
the succeeding
financial year
Before end of
May every year
States not submitting returns
Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh,
Assam, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh,
Jharkhand, Kerala, Maharashtra,
Meghalaya, Punjab, Rajasthan,
Sikkim, Tripura, Uttar Pradesh,
Uttarakhand and West Bengal (16
States).
Assam, Himachal Pradesh, Kerala,
Maharashtra, Meghalaya, Punjab,
Sikkim, Tripura, Uttar Pradesh and
West Bengal (10 States)
Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh,
Assam, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand,
Kerala, Maharashtra, Nagaland,
Punjab, Sikkim, Uttar Pradesh and
West Bengal (12 States).
Quarterly Returns
Return
Quarterly progress
monitoring reports (with
full details)
Status of functional/nonfunctional hand pumps
and other drinking water
supply schemes
Due Date for
Submission
By 20th of the
first month of the
following quarter
By 30th April,
31st July, 31st
October & 31st
January for the
preceding quarter
93
States not submitting returns
Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Jharkhand,
Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra,
Manipur, Meghalaya, Orissa, Sikkim,
Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal (12
states)
Arunachal Pradesh, Bihar, Gujarat,
Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu
& Kashmir, Jharkhand, Karnataka,
Kerala, Manipur, Maharashtra,
Meghalaya, Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan,
Sikkim, Tripura, Uttar Pradesh,
Uttarakhand and West Bengal (20
States).
Performance Audit Report No. 12 of 2008
Monthly Returns
Return
Due Date for
Submission
By 20th of the
following month
States not submitting returns
Progress reports in
respect of installation of
drinking water schemes
in rural schools
Monthly
Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Manipur,
Orissa, Rajasthan and West Bengal (6
States)
Progress of
performance of drilling
rigs of different types
By 20th of the
following month
Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Bihar,
Himachal Pradesh, Jammu &
Kashmir, Jharkhand, Madhya
Pradesh, Maharashtra, Manipur,
Meghalaya, Orissa, Rajasthan, Uttar
Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal
(15 States)
Monthly progress report
94
Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Manipur,
Orissa and West Bengal (5 States)