Values for timed limb coordination tests Age and Ageing 2012; 41: 803–807 doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs070 Published electronically 27 June 2012 20. Hairi NN, Cumming RG, Naganathan V et al. Loss of muscle strength, mass (sarcopenia), and quality (specific force) and its relationship with functional limitation and physical disability: the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010; 58: 2055–62. 21. Delmonico MJ, Harris TB, Visser M et al. Longitudinal study of muscle strength, quality, and adipose tissue infiltration. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 90: 1579–85. 22. Goodpaster BH, Carlson CL, Visser M et al. Attenuation of skeletal muscle and strength in the elderly: the Health ABC Study. J Appl Physiol 2001; 90: 2157–65. 23. Visser M, Kritchevsky SB, Goodpaster BH et al. Leg muscle mass and composition in relation to lower extremity performance in men and women aged 70 to 79: the health, aging and body composition study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50: 897–904. 24. Visser M, Goodpaster BH, Kritchevsky SB et al. Muscle mass, muscle strength, and muscle fat infiltration as predictors of incident mobility limitations in well-functioning older persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2005; 60: 324–33. 25. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 2010; 39: 412–23. Received 28 October 2011; accepted in revised form 29 April 2012 © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com Values for timed limb coordination tests in a sample of healthy older adults DESIREE JOY LANZINO, MEGAN N. CONNER, KELLI A. GOODMAN, KATHRYN H. KREMER, MAEGAN T. PETKUS, JOHN H. HOLLMAN Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA Address correspondence to: D. J. Lanzino. Tel: (+1) 507-538-0239; Fax: (+1) 507-284-0656. Email: lanzino.desiree@mayo.edu Abstract Background: timed limb coordination tests are reliable measures of motor performance but many lack published reference values. Objective: to determine mean values for timed tests in an older cohort, examining associations with anthropometric characteristics, handedness, gender and age. Design: cross-sectional. Setting: community. Subjects: sixty-nine healthy adults divided into three groups: 60–69, 70–79 and 80+ years. 803 Downloaded from http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on October 6, 2014 13. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 1994; 49: M85–94. 14. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF et al. Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000; 55: M221–31. 15. Estrada M, Kleppinger A, Judge JO, Walsh SJ, Kuchel GA. Functional impact of relative versus absolute sarcopenia in healthy older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007; 55: 1712–9. 16. Lim S, Kim JH, Yoon JW et al. Sarcopenic obesity: prevalence and association with metabolic syndrome in the Korean Longitudinal Study on Health and Aging (KLoSHA). Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 1652–4. 17. Baumgartner RN, Koehler KM, Gallagher D et al. Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 147: 755–63. 18. Valentine RJ, Misic MM, Rosengren KS, Woods JA, Evans EM. Sex impacts the relation between body composition and physical function in older adults. Menopause 2009; 16: 518–23. 19. Misic MM, Rosengren KS, Woods JA, Evans EM. Muscle quality, aerobic fitness and fat mass predict lower-extremity physical function in community-dwelling older adults. Gerontology 2007; 53: 260–6. D. J. Lanzino et al. Methods: height, weight and time to complete five repetitions of finger-to-nose, pronation–supination, mass grasp, opposition and heel-on-shin were recorded. Performances were statistically compared with anthropometric characteristics, handedness and across age groups and gender. Results: for all tests, height negatively correlated with speed (r = −0.26 to −0.41). Weight negatively correlated with performance of two tests (r = −0.25 to −0.35). When covariates were controlled, men performed heel-on-shin faster than women. The youngest group completed upper extremity tests faster than the oldest. Adults in their 70 s completed fingerto-nose and pronation–supination faster than persons aged 80+ years. Conclusions: we report mean values for five clinical tests of timed limb coordination that may aid in identifying mild deficits in otherwise healthy older adults. Keywords: coordination, psychomotor performance, neurological examination, older people Methods vTimed limb coordination tests are reliable measures of motor performance [1, 2] that are clinically useful. They can differentiate persons with Alzheimer’s disease [3] or Parkinson’s disease [4] from age-matched controls. Increased disease severity has been revealed by slower speed of performance in patients with pulmonary disease [5]. The effectiveness of botulinum toxin for spasticity and deep brain stimulation for dyskinesias is reflected by changes in timed performance [6, 7]. Coordination speed is even able to predict social participation years after a stroke [8]. The drawback of timed coordination measures is their lack of reported reference values [9]. Only two, finger tapping and finger-to-nose, have published norms. The number of finger taps in 10 s has been documented [10, 11], but a lever was used to record tapping strokes. Instrumentation improves test reliability [12], but is inconvenient and impractical in some settings. Two studies reported timed finger-to-nose (starting position: 90° shoulder flexion, fingers extended, no target) for persons in their teens to mid-30 s [13, 14]. Average time to complete five repetitions differed by one-half to 1 s between the reports, possibly due to the use of athletes in the study with faster results. Since timed performance decreases with age [15], times recorded for younger subjects are not applicable to older age groups. The only study to quantify the finger-to-nose test in older persons counted the number of repetitions completed in 20 s and had subjects alternately touching their nose and a wall target [16]. Most investigators time five cycles and do not use a wall target [1, 13]; therefore, the published values are not reflective of usual practice. The purposes of this study were to determine mean values for five timed limb coordination tests in a healthy older cohort, and to determine whether timed performance is associated with anthropometric characteristics [height, weight, body mass index (BMI)], influenced by hand dominance or age, or differs between genders. Findings from this study may provide references for clinicians to compare patient performance on the examined tests to aid in identifying impaired limb function. Participants 804 This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. Based on an a priori power analysis, a minimum of 54 participants distributed across three age groups (60–69, 70–79, 80+) and both genders was indicated to detect effect sizes of 0.50 at α = 0.05 at a statistical power (1 – β) of 0.90 to protect against Type II error. Recruitment flyers and word-of-mouth were used to recruit subjects around Rochester, MN. Males and females were recruited in equal numbers, since a gender difference has been reported for timed coordination tests [15]. Figure 1 depicts the sampling process, inclusion criteria and age group assignments. Interested subjects were screened for eligibility by phone and re-verified on the day of testing. Sixty-nine participants were eligible and provided written consent. Data collection Weight and height were recorded. Hand dominance was determined by the hand used for writing. Five repetitions of finger-to-nose, pronation–supination, mass grasp, finger opposition and heel-on-shin were timed using a stopwatch. These five tests have reported high inter-rater reliability coefficients even among persons of different levels of experience and backgrounds (intra-class correlation coefficients of 0.89–0.97) [17]. For test descriptions, see Supplementary data available in Age and Ageing online, Appendix 1, and for test choice justification, see Supplementary data available in Age and Ageing online, Appendix 2. Participants were seated during upper extremity tests and supine for heel-on-shin. Visual demonstration with verbal instruction of each measure was provided. Two timed trials were completed. The second was used for analysis, since a prior study found subjects performed faster during a second but not a third trial of coordination testing [14]. If the best effort was not given during the second trial, a third was completed and the fastest used for analysis. Participants performed each task until told to stop to ensure full speed throughout the tests, but only the first five cycles were timed. Downloaded from http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on October 6, 2014 Background and purpose Values for timed limb coordination tests Test performance and anthropometric characteristics Height negatively correlated with performance time for all tests (r = −0.26 to −0.41). Pronation–supination and mass grasp timed performance negatively correlated with participants’ weight (r = −0.25 to −0.35). There was no effect of weight on performing the remaining tests, or of BMI on any test (for correlation coefficients and P-values between participant anthropometrics and timed coordination test performance, see Supplementary data available in Age and Ageing online, Appendix 3). Handedness, gender and age effects Figure 1. Flow diagram depicting the evolution of the sample, inclusion criteria and participant group assignments. Data analysis Descriptive data stratified by age group, gender and hand dominance were calculated. Relationships between test performance and participants’ anthropometrics were examined with Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients, effects of hand dominance using paired t-tests and effects of age and gender with 3×2 analyses of covariance and Bonferroni adjustments. Anthropometric data that correlated with coordination performance were included as covariates. We used family wise α = 0.05 for all statistical tests. Results Sample characteristics Descriptive data and mean times for test performances across age groups and gender are presented in Table 1. Mean height and weight, but not BMI, differed significantly across genders and age group. Men were taller and heavier than women (P < 0.001). Persons in the youngest group were taller (P = 0.013) and heavier (P = 0.023) than persons in the oldest group. Discussion We report time-to-complete five repetitions of five common limb coordination tests in a healthy cohort over 60 years of age. Patient performance times could be compared with these to identify possible deficits or set goals. Published values for objective measures are important, since healthy older adults have variable performance that subjective assessment may surmise as pathologic [18]. Of the tests examined, reference values are available only for finger-to-nose. In a 2005 study [19], persons up to age 63 years completed the test in 3.49–4.09 s. Their fastest reported time is similar to persons in our 60–69 year group who averaged 3.5–3.7 s to complete five repetitions. We found height to be advantageous for moving faster. Prior timed coordination studies have not reported such an effect, unlike gait speed in which taller subjects walked faster [20]. Increased body weight resulted in faster pronation–supination and mass grasp performance. Perhaps increased soft tissue decreased total range of motion needed to fully complete these tests, increasing the apparent speed at which they can be performed. A 2010 study[13] found BMI negatively affected time to complete finger-to-nose, but BMI had no effect on limb speed in 805 Downloaded from http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on October 6, 2014 Handedness had no effect on timed performance (P = 0.086, 0.058, 0.071, 0.383 and 0.859 for the finger-to-nose, pronation–supination, mass grasp, finger opposition and heel-on-shin tests, respectively). Men performed faster than women during pronation–supination (P = 0.005), mass grasp (P = 0.005) and heel-on-shin (P = 0.006) tests, but once height (all tests) and weight ( pronation–supination and mass grasp) were controlled, men and women differed only in heel-on-shin performance (Table 1). Performance times were slower in the 80+ group than the 60–69 group across all upper extremity tests, and slower in the 80+ group than the 70–79 group in the finger-to-nose and pronation–supination tests (Table 1). Test performances between the 70–79 and 60– 69 groups did not differ. D. J. Lanzino et al. Table 1. Means and standard deviations (SD) for demographic and anthropometric characteristics of the study sample, along with adjusted performance times for five timed tests of limb coordination Parameter Women Men 60–69 n = 12 70–79 n = 12 80+ n = 12 60–69 n = 12 70–79 n = 12 80+ n=9 66.2 (2.7) 163.3 (4.4) 73.4 (10.2) 27.5 (3.3) 3.6 (0.9) 2.9 (0.6) 2.4 (0.7) 6.3 (1.7) 4.3 (0.9) 73.3 (2.0) 159.4 (6.3) 70.8 (10.5) 27.8 (3.4) 4.0 (1.0) 3.2 (0.6) 2.8 (0.8) 7.2 (1.9) 4.8 (1.1) 82.7 (2.8) 156.7 (4.4) 62.9 (11.9) 25.6 (4.9) 4.8 (1.2) 3.8 (0.7) 3.2 (0.9) 8.7 (2.1) 5.2 (1.2) 66.5 (2.6) 177.1 (6.0) 89.2 (9.5) 28.5 (3.3) 3.6 (1.1) 2.9 (0.7) 2.4 (0.9) 6.7(2.0) 4.0 (1.2) 73.1 (3.4) 174.9 (3.8) 88.1 (13.3) 28.8 (4.4) 3.8 (1.0) 2.9 (0.6) 2.4 (0.8) 7.2 (1.9) 3.7 (1.1) 84.2 (4.1) 174.0 (7.4) 81.8 (8.2) 27.1 (2.9) 4.4 (1.0) 3.1 (0.6) 2.8 (0.7) 7.8 (1.8) 4.1 (1.0) .................................................................................... Age (years) Height (cm) Weight (kg) BMI Finger-to-nose* Pronation–supination** Mass grasp*** Finger opposition**** Heel-on-shin***** our cohort, which was older (mean 22 versus 73.7 years) with a larger average BMI (23.5 versus 27.7). Performance did not vary significantly according to handedness, unlike previous studies [13, 14, 16]. While men performed heel-on-shin faster than women, gender did not play a role in upper limb performance once height and weight were controlled. Prior investigators found men faster than women in timed tasks [13, 16]. However, these reports do not appear to have considered how height and weight may have accounted for group differences. Analysis for potential effects of height on timed performance warrants further study. Over a lifetime, timed performance becomes fastest during the teen years through the third decade of life [2, 13, 14]. Performance time begins to slow by 40–50 years of age depending on task and gender [10, 15]. Ours and previous findings [16] suggest that slowing continues with age and significantly so after the age of 80 for many timed coordination tasks. Key points • We report mean values for five timed limb coordination tests that may help identify mild deficits in otherwise healthy older adults. • Taller subjects had faster limb coordination test times. • Upper limb performance was significantly slower after age 80. Funding This work was supported by the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. The funding source played no role in the design, execution, data analysis and interpretation or writing of the study. Supplementary data Limitations Results are based on a small sample of healthy adults and may not generalise to subjects in poor health, frail or institutionalised. Slower speed of performance from these groups may not reflect neuromuscular impairment, therefore, validation studies with larger samples across a variety of older adults are needed. Finally, speed is just one aspect of coordination to assess; it may not correlate with quality of movement. 806 Supplementary data mentioned in the text is available to subscribers in Age and Ageing online. References 1. Swaine BR, Sullivan SJ. Reliability of the scores for the finger-to-nose test in adults with traumatic brain injury. Phys Ther 1993; 73: 71–8. Downloaded from http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on October 6, 2014 Times are reported in seconds. Since times between dominant and non-dominant extremities were not significantly different, adjusted performance times are reported only for the dominant extremity; cm, centimeter; kg, kilograms. *Finger-to-nose performance, adjusted for height, differed between age groups (P = 0.003) but not between genders (P = 0.640). Performance was slower in the 80+ group than in the 70–79 group (P = 0.030) and in the 60–69 group (P = 0.003). Performance in the 70–79 and 60–69 age groups did not differ (P = 0.957). **Pronation–supination performance, adjusted for height and weight, differed between age groups (P = 0.006) but not between genders (P = 0.208). Performance was slower in the 80+ group than in the 70–79 group (P = 0.041) and in the 60–69 group (P = 0.006). Performance in the 70–79 and 60–69 age groups did not differ (P = 1.000). ***Mass grasp performance, adjusted for height and weight, differed between age groups (P = 0.038) but not between genders (P = 0.439). Performance was slower in the 80+ group than in the 60–69 group (P = 0.035). Performance in the 70–79 and 60–69 age groups did not differ (P = 0.988), nor did performance in the 80+ and 70–79 age groups (P = 0.226). ****Finger opposition performance, adjusted for height, differed between age groups (P = 0.003) but not between genders (P = 0.837). Performance was slower in the 80+ group than in the 60–69 group (P = 0.002). Performance in the 70–79 and 60–69 age groups did not differ (P = 0.312), nor did performance in the 80+ and 70–79 age groups (P = 0.112). *****Heel-on-shin performance, adjusted for height, differed between genders (P = 0.033) but not between age groups (P = 0.228). WWW. Do not forget older people 12. Arceneaux JM, Kirkendall DJ, Hill SK, Dean RS, Anderson JL. Validity and reliability of rapidly alternating movement tests. Int J Neurosci 1997; 89: 281–6. 13. Schneiders AG, Sullivan SJ, Gray AR, Hammond-Tooke GD, McCrory PR. Normative values for three clinical measures of motor performance used in the neurological assessment of sports concussion. J Sci Med Sport 2010; 13: 196–201. 14. Swaine BR, Desrosiers J, Bourbonnais D, Larochelle JL. Norms for 15- to 34-year olds for different versions of the finger-to-nose test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1665–9. 15. Kauranen K, Vanharanta H. Influences of aging, gender, and handedness on motor performance of upper and lower extremities. Percept Mot Skills 1996; 82: 515–25. 16. Desrosiers J, Hebert R, Bravo G, Dutil E. Upper-extremity motor co-ordination of healthy elderly people. Age Ageing 1995; 24: 108–12. 17. Lanzino D, Rabinstein A, Kinlaw D et al.. Inter-rater reliability and known-group validity of coordination tests in patients with acute central nervous system pathology. J Neurol Phys Ther 2012; doi:10.1097/NPT.0b013e3182641d36. 18. Louis ED, Ford B, Wendt KJ, Lee H, Andrews H. A comparison of different bedside tests for essential tremor. Mov Disord 1999; 14: 462–7. 19. Swaine BR, Lortie E, Gravel D. The reliability of the time to execute various forms of the finger-to_nose test in healthy subjects. Physiother Theory Pract 2005; 21: 271–9. 20. Bohannon RW. Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. Age Ageing 1997; 26: 15–9. Received 28 October 2011; accepted in revised form 29 April 2012 Age and Ageing 2012; 41: 807–810 © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs083 All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com Published electronically 16 August 2012 WWW. Do not forget older people HEATHER MACFARLANE1, MARK T. KINIRONS2, MATTHEW F. BULTITUDE3 1 School of Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK Department of Ageing and Health, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital, ECU, 9th Floor, North wing St Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK 3 Urology Centre, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK 2 Address correspondence to: M. F. Bultitude. Tel: (+44) 020 7 188 2519; Fax: (+44) 020 7 955 4465. Email: matthew.bultitude@ gstt.nhs.uk Abstract Background: internet use continues to grow. It is often assumed that most users are younger or middle aged. We set out to establish how access to and use of the Internet varied with age. Methods: we surveyed a sample of patients attending urology outpatient clinics in a one week period. 807 Downloaded from http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on October 6, 2014 2. Largo RH, Caflisch JA, Hug F et al.. Neuromotor development from 5 to 18 years. Part 1: timed performance. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001; 43: 436–43. 3. Ott BR, Ellias SA, Lannon MC. Quantitative assessment of movement in Alzheimer’s disease. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1995; 8: 71–5. 4. Haaxma CA, Bloem BR, Overeem S, Borm GF, Horstink M. Timed motor tests can detect subtle motor dysfunction in early Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2010; 25: 1150–6. 5. Butcher SJ, Meshke JM, Sheppard MS. Reductions in functional balance, coordination, and mobility measures among patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2004; 24: 274–80. 6. Hurvitz EA, Conti GE, Brown SH. Changes in movement characteristics of the spastic upper extremity after botulinum toxin injection. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 444–54. 7. Papapetropoulos S, Jagid JR, Sengun C, Singer C, Gallo BV. Objective monitoring of tremor and bradykinesia during DBS surgery for Parkinson disease. Neurology 2008; 70: 1244–9. 8. Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A, Bourbonnais D, Bravo G, Bourget A. Predictors of long-term participation after stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 221–30. 9. Largo RH, Caflisch JA, Hug F, Muggli K, Molnar AA, Molinari L. Neuromotor development from 5 to 18 years. Part 2: associated movements. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001; 43: 444–53. 10. Ruff RM, Parker SB. Gender- and age-specific changes in motor speed and eye-hand coordination in adults: normative values for the finger tapping and grooved pegboard tests. Percept Motor Skills 1993; 76: 1219–30. 11. Arnold G, Boone KB, Lu P et al.. Sensitivity and specificity of finer tapping test scores for the detection of suspect effort. Clin Neuropsychol 2005; 19: 105–20.
© Copyright 2024