Wheelock College Social Work Student Handbook and Field Practicum Manual Wheelock College Social Work Department School of Professional and Graduate Programs 200 The Riverway Boston, MA 02215 P (617) 879-2335 F (617) 879-2203 socialwork@wheelock.edu Social Work Leadership Team Hope Haslam Straughan, PhD, MSW, ACSW Associate Dean for Social Work, Leadership & Policy Associate Professor of Social Work (617) 879-2330 hstraughan@wheelock.edu Deborah Lisansky Beck, MSW, LICSW BSW Program Chair Assistant Professor of Social Work (617) 879-2216 dbeck@wheelock.edu Sue Harju Faculty Assistant (617) 879-2200 sharju@wheelock.edu Wendy Champagnie Williams, PhD(c), MSW, LICSW MSW Program Chair Instructor of Social Work (617) 879-2162 wwilliams@wheelock.edu Devon Reber, MSW Director of Social Work Field Education (617) 879-2425 dreber@wheelock.edu Social Work Field Education Devon Reber, MSW Director of Social Work Field Education (617) 879-2425 dreber@wheelock.edu Diane Zipoli, MSW, LICSW Assistant Director of Social Work Field Education Instructor of Social Work (617) 879-2290 dzipoli@wheelock.edu Terry Moynahan, MSW Social Work Field Education Advisor (617) 879-2452 tmoynahan@wheelock.edu Wheelock College Social Work Student Handbook and Field Practicum Manual Social Work Faculty Full- and Half-Time Nina Aronoff, PhD, MSW, LICSW Associate Professor of Social Work (617) 879-2416 naronoff@wheelock.edu Será Godfrey, MSW, LICSW Instructor of Social Work (617) 230-0627 sgrantz@wheelock.edu Lenette Azzi-Lessing, PhD Associate Professor of Social Work (617) 879-2377 lalessing@wheelock.edu Hope Haslam Straughan, PhD, MSW, ACSW Associate Professor of Social Work (617) 879-2330 hstraughan@wheelock.edu Deborah Lisansky Beck, MSW, LICSW Assistant Professor of Social Work (617) 879-2216 dbeck@wheelock.edu Heather Howard, PhD(c), MSW, LICSW Instructor of Social Work hhoward@wheelock.edu (401) 486-0805 James Bourque, MSW Instructor of Social Work (617) 879-2198 jbourque@wheelock.edu Wendy Champagnie Williams, PhD(c), MSW, LICSW Instructor of Social Work (617) 879-2162 wwilliams@wheelock.edu Wade Taylor, PhD, MSW Assistant Professor of Social Work 617-879-2188 wtaylor@wheelock.edu Ashley Davis, PhD, MSW, LICSW Assistant Professor of Social Work (617) 879-2023 adavis@wheelock.edu Nicole Dubus, PhD, MSW, LICSW Assistant Professor of Social Work (617) 879-2198 ndubus@wheelock.edu Wheelock College Social Work Student Handbook and Field Practicum Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction to Wheelock College Description of the College Mission of the College Wheelock College Policy on Non-Discrimination and Sexual Harassment Absence Due to Religious Beliefs Academic Programs Academic Honesty Policy Academic Honor Code Academic Dishonesty Student Code of Conduct Attendance Campus Computing Policy Additional Policies Support Services for Students Institutional Review Board 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 3 6 14 14 15 15 17 II. Introduction to the Social Work Profession The Code of Ethics of the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) Universal Declaration of Human Rights Educational Policy & Accreditation Standards of the Council on Social Work Education 18 18 39 45 III. Introduction to BSW & MSW Social Work Programs History of the Social Work Programs Mission of the Social Work Programs Justice-Based Social Work Practice 49 49 49 50 IV. Goals, Curricular Themes and Shared Content for BSW & MSW Programs Program Goals Curricular Themes Program Framework Curricular Themes & Content Program Commitment to Self-Care Rights and Responsibilities of the Social Work Student Advising in the Social Work Programs Social Work Student Support Team Meetings Social Work Program Individual Student Review Policy on Communication of Information 51 The Bachelor of Social Work Program Degree Requirements and Course Descriptions Admission to the BSW Program BSW Advising BSW Program Entrance Questionnaire The BSW Field Practicum: Basic Facts Acknowledgment of Understanding of Practicum Policies 65 65 67 67 69 70 71 V. Wheelock College Social Work Student Handbook and Field Practicum Manual 51 51 58a 59 59 61 63 63 64 Field Practicum Planning and Placement Contract Integration with Course Content 73 75 VI. The Master of Social Work (MSW) Program Degree Requirements and Course Descriptions Admission to MSW Program Request - Change of MSW Program Plan MSW Advising Acknowledgment of Understanding of Practicum Policies Field Practicum Planning and Placement Contract Foundation Year Content and Structure Concentration Year Content and Structure Advanced Practice Behaviors Advanced Standing MSW Program MSW Part-Time Programs Master of Social Work Worcester Off-Campus Degree Dual Degree MSW & M.S. in Nonprofit Leadership and Social Entrepreneurship Graduate Certificates MSW Field Practicum Foundation Year Field Practicum Foundation Year Practicum Learning Outcomes Concentration Year Field Practicum Concentration Year Practicum Learning Outcomes Flexible Field Option 76 76 76 77 79 81 82 83 84 84 86 87 87 87 88 88 89 89 90 90 91 VII. Social Work Field Practicum Policies & Forms Evaluation of Professional Suitability in Social Work Practicum Explanation of Terms Used in Relation to the Practicum Experience Placement Process Field Placement Interview Process Policy Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) and Other Background Checks Student Safety in the Field Rights and Responsibilities of the Social Work Practicum Student Support for Students Student Injuries Criteria for the Selection of Field Practicum Sites Criteria for Selection of Field Instructors Roles and Expectations of Faculty Field Liaison Roles and Expectations of the Field Education Office Support for Field Instructors Resource Information Attendance Policy Semester Break and Wheelock Calendar School or School-Based Placement Policy Inclement Weather Advisory Flexible Field Option Terms for “R” Grade Application Wheelock College Social Work Student Handbook and Field Practicum Manual 92 92 92 93 94 94 95 95 97 98 98 99 100 101 101 103 104 104 104 104 105 105 Summer Social Work Seminar Policy Student Practicum at Place of Employment Compensation at Placement Site The Learning Contract Practicum Assignments Use of Case Materials in Class Process Recordings Assignments with Groups and Larger Systems Group Work Assignments Assignments with Practice in Larger Systems Examples of Assignments with Larger Systems Outline of Suggested Practicum Activities in the First Semester Outline of Suggested Practicum Activities in the Second Semester Outline of Suggested Practicum Activities in the First Semester: CY Outline of Suggested Practicum Activities in the Second Semester: CY Process for Disruption in Field Practicum Withdrawal from Practicum Reinstatement in a Practicum Protocol for Addressing Practicum Ethical Problems Field Practicum Forms (BSW & MSW) Field Placement Information Sheet Flexible Field Option Agreement Student Internship at Employment Agreement Learning Contract & Evaluation: BSW & Foundation Year MSW Practice Behaviors Learning Contract & Evaluation: MSW Concentration Year Advanced Practice Behaviors Student Weekly Report on Field Practicum Verbatim Process Recording Explanation & Format (BSW & MSW) Verbatim Process Recording Form Larger Systems Processing Form Group and Family Process Recording Form Perception of Disrupted Placement – Student Perception of Disrupted Placement - Faculty Field Liaison Perception of Disrupted Placement - Field Instructor Evaluation of Practicum Site - Student Evaluation of Practicum Site & Field Instructor - Faculty Field Liaison Evaluation of Faculty Field Liaison - Field Instructor Summary of Student Practicum Experience - Faculty Field Liaison 2014-2015 Important Social Work Field Education Dates Wheelock College Social Work Student Handbook and Field Practicum Manual 106 106 107 107 109 109 109 109 109 110 111 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 124 125 127 128 129 144 158 160 162 164 168 171 173 175 177 179 181 183 184 I. INTRODUCTION TO WHEELOCK COLLEGE DESCRIPTION OF THE COLLEGE Wheelock College was founded in 1888 by Lucy Wheelock, one of the early leaders of the kindergarten movement in this country. Committed at both the undergraduate and graduate levels to the professions of Education, Child Life, and Social Work, Wheelock also offers a professional major in Juvenile Justice and Youth Advocacy. Wheelock offers liberal arts majors in the Arts, Humanities, Mathematics and Science, American Studies, Communications, Psychology and Human Development, Political Science and Global Studies. Although Wheelock College is a private institution supported by members of a board of trustees and a corporation, it maintains a very public profile, attending to the demands of an urban and diverse population in the greater Boston area. Senior administrative officers and members of the faculty engage in policy development and decision-making with academics, legislators, and members of the business and professional communities within the greater Boston and New England areas, as well as in many national and international locations. MISSION OF THE COLLEGE The mission of Wheelock College is to improve the lives of children and families. Wheelock carries out this mission by providing a sound liberal arts and professional education, contributing to the knowledge of professionals in the field, generating and sharing new knowledge, and influencing the development of social policy. The mission of the College is sustained and promoted by its academic programs, by involvement in the life of the surrounding community and communities in other parts of the world, and by research, curriculum development, and professional activities. Wheelock’s mission statement creates a context for and a relationship with the historical mission and roots of the social work profession. As Lucy Wheelock was engaged in the education of young children, Jane Addams, a leading social work pioneer, was organizing the settlement house movement in Chicago, which she described in 1892 as “an experimental effort to aid in the solution of the social and industrial problems which are engendered by the modern conditions of life in a great city” (“The Subjective Necessity for Social Settlements,” 1892, from http://quotes.dictionary.com). Thus, as Lucy Wheelock was nurturing young children in the establishment of kindergartens, Jane Addams was focusing on improving social conditions in the neighborhoods and communities where children lived with their families and where their parents worked to support them. WHEELOCK COLLEGE POLICY ON NON-DISCRIMINATION Introduction Wheelock College is committed to creating a community in which each person is respected and where every reasonable effort is made to accept and honor the cultural, racial, religious, ethnic, and physical differences among people. The goals supporting this commitment include the following: to make Wheelock College a place where persons of any age, race, color, national or ethnic origin, handicapping condition, and gender or sexual orientations feel welcome and respected; 1 to make visible and to celebrate the differences among Wheelock College students and among all individuals in the Wheelock College community, in the City of Boston, and beyond; to create a climate which welcomes and sustains minority students, faculty members, and administrators; and to create a community at Wheelock College in which every reasonable effort is made to respect and honor difference and diversity. Notice of Non-discrimination Wheelock College does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, age, legally recognized handicap, or veteran status, except as provided in exclusions in the law. Wheelock College does not tolerate sexual harassment of students or employees. Any person having inquiries or complaints concerning Wheelock College's compliance with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Age Discrimination Act of 1975, or Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ("Non-Discrimination Laws") is directed to contact the President of Wheelock College at Wheelock College, 200 The Riverway, Boston, MA 02215. The President has been designated by Wheelock College to coordinate the College's efforts to comply with the NonDiscrimination Laws. Any person may also contact the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C. 20202, or the Director, U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights, Region One, Boston, Massachusetts 02109, regarding the College's compliance with the Non-Discrimination Laws. Wheelock College is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer. Wheelock is authorized under federal law to enroll non-immigrant alien students. Sexual Harassment Wheelock College affirms its policy that all members of the college community, including its faculty, administration, students and staff have a right to be free from sex discrimination in the form of sexual harassment by any other member of the college community. For more detailed information regarding this policy, please refer to the Wheelock College Course Catalog and/or the Student Handbook. ABSENCE DUE TO RELIGIOUS BELIEFS The College complies with Massachusetts law (G.L. c. 151C, § 2B) which provides, in relevant part, that: “Any student in an educational…institution,…who is unable, because of his religious beliefs, to attend classes or to participate in any examination, study, or work requirement on a particular day shall be excused from any such examination or study or work requirement, and shall be provided with an opportunity to make up such examination, study, or work requirement which he may have missed because of such absence on any particular day; however, that such a makeup examination or work shall not create an unreasonable burden upon such school. No fees of any kind shall be charged by the institution for making available to the said student such opportunity. No adverse or prejudicial effects shall result to any student because of his availing himself of the provisions of this section.” 2 ACADEMIC PROGRAMS The following information may be found in the Wheelock College Catalog available online at http://www.wheelock.edu/academics/academic-records-and-registration/course-catalog ● Degree requirements for the BSW and MSW programs ● Course Descriptions and Prerequisites for the BSW and MSW programs ● Double Majors and Minors (BSW) ACADEMIC HONESTY POLICY Wheelock College is committed to promoting intellectual growth in an environment that honors academic integrity, ethical behavior, and academic excellence. To that end, an Academic Honesty System has been established to ensure that proper behavior is recognized and that improper behavior is addressed in a fair, consistent, and timely manner. Students are required to meet the College’s standards for academic honesty which include producing original work, crediting non-original work and outside sources, and behaving honestly in all academic endeavors. ACADEMIC HONOR CODE Central to the Academic Honesty System is the Academic Honor Code. Undergraduate and graduate students must agree to be bound by the Code when they enter their programs. All students must comply with the Academic Honor Code at all times while they are enrolled at the College. The Academic Honor Code follows: “As a citizen of the Wheelock College community, I am committed to acting honestly and with integrity in all aspects of academic life. I pledge to conduct myself ethically in my academic endeavors. I accept responsibility for what I write and what I say. In the spirit of trust, I will not misrepresent my academic work. I will not cheat and I will work toward creating a fair academic environment for all.” ACADEMIC DISHONESTY Academic dishonesty is broadly defined as any act that undermines or compromises academic integrity. It can take many forms. It is the responsibility of all Wheelock students to understand what constitutes academic dishonesty. It is the responsibility of each student to seek advice if he or she does not fully understand what constitutes academic dishonesty. Some of the most obvious forms of academic dishonesty are the following: Plagiarism Referring to sources is a necessary and expected part of any research project or paper. It is necessary to credit and cite any and all sources used in any project or paper that are not a student’s original work. Plagiarism is a form of academic dishonesty and is the deliberate use of the work, words or ideas of another person or other source without clearly acknowledging the source. Examples of plagiarism include but are not limited to: copying word for word from another source without acknowledgement (i.e., not putting quotation marks around words that come from another source or quoting the author directly, and writing the reference appropriately) paraphrasing from another source without acknowledgement using special terms or phrases from another source without acknowledgement using sentences, phrases or words that closely parallel another source without acknowledgement summarizing without acknowledgment 3 Cheating Cheating is a form of academic dishonesty and includes but is not limited to: copying from another individual during a test or examination receiving help without acknowledging that help Falsifying data Falsifying data is a form of academic dishonesty and includes crediting or citing sources that have not been used or fabricating data. It may also include false reports of observations, such as child observations, that have not actually taken place. Multiple submissions of papers or projects Submitting a project or paper that has been or will be submitted for another course without prior permission from the instructors of those courses is a form of academic dishonesty. Submitting work prepared by another individual Submitting work prepared by another individual is a form of academic dishonesty. Unauthorized submission of materials obtained from another person’s files, commercial term paper sources, or Internet websites are some common examples of this form of academic dishonesty. Unauthorized use of aids during examinations Unauthorized use of books, calculators, notes or other aids during examinations is a form of academic dishonesty. Unauthorized collaboration Unauthorized collaboration with others during classroom examinations, take home exams, or projects is a form of academic dishonesty. While collaboration may be authorized and appropriate in some situations, the role of each collaborator must be clear and acknowledged. Other forms of dishonesty As stated above, academic dishonesty can take many forms, including the following: unauthorized computer use damage or theft of library materials forgeries misrepresenting work that is submitted misrepresenting personal circumstances to an instructor to obtain an extension of time or other relief from course requirements Where to Get Help Regarding the Issues of Academic Honesty The Wheelock College faculty and the staffs of the Writing Center, Office of Academic Advising, and Library are all ready, willing, and able to assist students with research and writing assignments and to offer guidance on proper reference and citation standards. These resources can also help with study skills, such as proper note taking and time management. 4 Procedures to Review Possible Academic Honestly Violations The Academic Honesty System is jointly administered by the Vice President for Academic Affairs and the Academic Appeals Board. The Academic Appeals Board is responsible for reviewing possible violations of the Academic Honesty Code. The following procedures will be followed: 1. All situations involving possible violations will initially be handled by the instructor who has reason to believe that a student has violated the Academic Honesty Code. The instructor must notify the student of the possible violation and present whatever information exists about the possible violation to the student and the student must be given an opportunity to respond. The instructor may consult the Dean of his or her School or his or her Department Chair for guidance or advice or refer the matter to the Academic Appeals Board. 2. If the instructor believes that a violation of the Academic Honesty Code has occurred, he or she may complete an Academic Dishonesty Report reporting the violation and indicating what penalty he or she has imposed. The completed Report must be filed in the Office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs. 3. If the instructor and student do not agree that a violation has occurred and/or on the penalty imposed, the student may request a hearing before the Academic Appeals Board. The instructor and the student must attend the hearing and both will be given an opportunity to present information to the Board. 4. After both the instructor and the student have been given an opportunity to present information to the Board, the Board will decide: (a) if a violation of the Academic Honesty Code has occurred and (b), if a violation has occurred, whether the penalty imposed by the instructor is appropriate or, if not, what an appropriate penalty is. 5. All decisions of the Academic Appeals Board may be appealed by either the instructor and/or the student to the Vice President for Academic Affairs, or his or her delegate. The decision of the Vice President for Academic Affairs, or his or her delegate, on any appeal is final. 6. A record of all violations of the Academic Honesty Code will be filed in the Office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs. These records are not part of a student’s permanent academic record and will be destroyed when the student graduates or leaves the College. However, dismissal from the College or suspension from the College for academic dishonesty will be noted on the student’s permanent record. Penalties An instructor has wide discretion to determine what penalty to impose if he or she believes that a student has violated the Academic Honesty Code. These penalties may include, but are not limited to, lowering a grade or assigning a failing grade for a specific assignment; lowering a grade for a course; failure of a course; or assigning additional work. An instructor may choose to refer the matter to the Academic Appeals Board. The Board may recommend whatever penalties it deems appropriate under the circumstances, including suspension or expulsion from the College. Repeat violations of the Academic Honesty Code will typically result in harsher penalties. The Vice President for Academic Affairs will inform the Board of any prior violations of the Academic Honesty Code by a student. The Board may consider whether the penalty imposed by the instructor for a repeat violator/violation is adequate and may impose a more severe penalty. The Vice President for Academic Affairs will be the final arbiter and decision-maker on all issues 5 involving possible violations of the Academic Honesty Code. STUDENT CODE OF CONDUCT Scope and Purpose Scope The Student Code of Conduct applies to all undergraduate and graduate students enrolled in any course or program at Wheelock College, whether on a part-time or full-time basis. It is the expectation of the College that all students will be good and respectful citizens. The Student Code of Conduct applies to on-campus or off-campus activities, college-sponsored or not. If conduct by students, in the judgment of the College, is deemed unbecoming in the interest of the College, the College reserves the right to conduct an administrative hearing or a hearing before the Student Conduct Board. Purpose Consistent with the College’s Mission, the purposes of the Code of Conduct are to: (a) Establish standards of personal conduct. (b) Provide for the advancement of knowledge and the development of ethically sensitive and responsible persons. (c) recognize that students are adults and, as such, their relationships with the College community should reflect this. (d) Ensure fair treatment of students without regard to their race, color, national origin, sex, age, handicap, sexual orientation, or political or religious beliefs. Limitations The Code of Conduct does not create contractual rights for students or impose limits on the College’s authority to regulate student conduct. As a private institution, the College may impose or withhold sanctions as the College deems appropriate. The President, Dean of Students, or the Director of Residence Life may modify the Code of Conduct at any time and for any reason. Conduct Code Classifications The College Honor Code – It is the expectation of the College that all Wheelock College students will conduct themselves as good and respectful citizens, in accordance with the policies governing the College community. Any and all forms of dishonesty, including, but not limited to plagiarism, cheating, furnishing false information, forgery and altering or misusing documents are unacceptable. All students must comply with the Academic Honor Code at all times while they are enrolled at the College in order to create a fair academic environment for all. In disciplinary matters, students are expected to be honest and fully disclosing of the whole truth. Any attempt to deceive, withhold information, or obstruct the investigation or process of justice will be regarded as a violation of the Student Code of Conduct. Climate of Respect It is expected that students will conduct their affairs with the utmost respect toward those within and without the College community in accordance with the College mission and creed. Any student who treats another unfairly, unkindly, disrespectfully or abusively will be subject to adjudication. Wheelock’s required climate of mutual respect includes all 6 forms of social media communication. Disrespectful, uncivil or threatening communication via Facebook, Twitter, email, blogs, or other online media will prompt immediate disciplinary sanction. Criminal Charges When the College is aware that criminal charges have been brought against a Wheelock College student by federal, state, or local authorities, the College reserves the right to take appropriate action against the student, including but not limited to, suspension or expulsion from the College, and/or from residence, pending the outcome of judicial proceedings. Double Jeopardy The College reserves the right to adjudicate all matters in light of College standards. College disciplinary proceedings, carried out prior to, simultaneously with, or following the findings of a court of law, do not constitute double jeopardy. College officials may, at their sole discretion, adjudicate on an alleged violation of the Code of Conduct against a student also charged with a violation of law (i.e., both the alleged Code of Conduct violation and the alleged legal violation arise from the same factual situation), without regard to civil or criminal arrest and prosecution of the student in a court of law. The principle of double jeopardy does not apply to the College’s disciplinary proceedings. Off-Campus Violations If Wheelock College students are involved in any off-campus activities that involve a violation of federal, state or local law, or otherwise inappropriate non-criminal behavior, the College reserves that right to take disciplinary action against said students, particularly when such activities adversely affect or threaten the interests, reputation, operation, safety, and/or well- being of the College community or its members. Student Bill of Rights (Due Process) Wheelock College students are expected to maintain mature attitudes and must bear the responsibility to act in accordance with local, Commonwealth, and Federal laws, as well as those of the College. No right specified here is meant to be construed as enabling students to infringe upon the individual rights of another member of the community: The right to be presumed innocent until determined to be in violation. (It should be noted, however, that certain circumstances may require the College to impose sanctions or restrictions pending a hearing or pending some other manner of adjudication or resolution of the matter). Notification of allegations at least three days in advance of a FORMAL conduct hearing, unless waived by the student, or revoked by the College for the sake of expediency in serious matters involving the safety or wellbeing of the College community. In certain instances, additional infractions may be revealed as the hearing progresses. The student will, of course, be held accountable for such Conduct Code violations, even though said violations were not noted in the original notification. The right to a hearing either by the Dean of Students and/or his or her designee, or by the Conduct board (depending upon the severity of the charges and the discretion of the appropriate College officials, particularly the Dean of Students). The right to admit or deny all charges, to call witnesses, and to present 7 evidence on his or her own behalf. The right to seek an appeal as described elsewhere in the Wheelock College Student Handbook. The right to be given a written summary of disciplinary decisions. The right to a degree of confidentiality in disciplinary matters, except for proper use, internally and externally, of information by the College. In addition, in some cases, when deemed necessary, the College reserves the right to notify parents/guardians. Proscribed Content The following list of proscribed conduct is not intended to be all-inclusive or to limit the types of inappropriate conduct that may subject a student to sanctions or disciplinary action. Rules and regulations of the College, residence halls and departments that are not listed or are excluded below are incorporated herein by reference. Such rules and regulations may be communicated to students in publications and posted notices including, but not limited to, the Student Handbook, College Catalog, housing contracts, and other official publications. Notwithstanding the above, the Code of Conduct does not cover violations of academic policies. Violations of academic policies will be addressed by the Vice President for Academic Affairs. In the event that conduct may violate both the Code of Conduct and academic policies, the Dean of Students and the Vice President for Academic Affairs will determine how the student’s conduct should be addressed. The President will be the final arbiter of any determination made by the Dean of Students and Vice President for Academic Affairs. Violations Alcohol and Drug Presence, possession, or consumption of alcohol by a minor. Incapacitation or intoxication by the influence of alcohol or another drug or substance; behavior that contributes to the intoxication or incapacitation of another student. Provision, purchase, and/or transportation of alcohol for minors. Unauthorized distribution or purchase of alcohol. For students over twenty-one years of age, exceeding the legal limit for possession of alcohol on campus or exceeding the legal limit for consumption of alcohol at off- campus College-sponsored events. Possession of drinking paraphernalia and/or possession of or participation in drinking games. Possession of a keg or beer ball, empty or full, tapped or untapped. Possession of an excessive amount of alcohol. Possessing or consuming alcoholic beverages in public areas of residence halls. Possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages at on-campus, Collegesanctioned events. Bringing alcohol to off-campus College-sponsored events. Possession or consumption of grain alcohol and other “fortified” wines. Carrying open containers of alcohol in public on campus. Public intoxication. Presence, possession, manufacture or any non-medical use of marijuana. 8 Presence, possession, or use of any illegal drug or drug paraphernalia; presence, possession, or nonmedical use of any narcotic or hallucinogenic. Drug sale or distribution of illegal or non-prescribed drugs or drug paraphernalia Fire and Safety Failure to evacuate any building in the event of a fire or other emergency alarm. Disabling, removing or otherwise tampering with exit signs or emergency lighting. Illegal or unauthorized possession of firearms, explosives, fireworks, other weapons, or dangerous chemicals or combustibles. Use of any such item, even if legally possessed, in a matter that harms, threatens or causes fear to others. Possession of counterfeit, replica, or blank-firing firearms or realisticlooking toy firearms, knives, or swords. Possession of pellet, paint, and bb guns. Possession of any prohibited item as listed under Residence Life – Prohibited Items in the Residence Halls. Smoking in any College building, including residence halls. Disabling, misusing, removing or tampering with fire alarm systems and other building safety equipment. Tampering with or discharge of fire extinguishers. Activating a false fire alarm. Tampering with or damage to smoke detectors, sprinklers, or stand pipes. Causing a fire or flood. Making or contributing to a bomb threat. Dishonesty, Forgery, or Theft Removing food or other items from the dining facilities without authorization. Possessing, providing, producing and/or utilizing false identification material. Accepting payment for such material. Forgery or alteration of the student identification card, or any such document issued by the College. Dishonesty in connection with any College activity including cheating, forgery, plagiarism, or knowingly furnishing false information to a College official. Theft of property or services; knowing of possession of stolen property without notification of proper authorities. Theft of College and/or personal property. Room Entry and Searches For information about room entry and searches please see page 6 of the Student Handbook under the Residence Life section. Additional Proscribed Conduct Expression of any form which is degrading, demeaning, abusive, or harassing toward others, particularly on the basis of race, color, cultural background, handicap, age, sexual orientation, or political or religious beliefs. This covers all forms of communication, including verbal, written, and electronic media, and all forms of interaction, including 9 physical and verbal. Intentional disruption or obstruction of teaching, research, administration, disciplinary proceedings, or other College activities. Behavior or activity that threatens or endangers the health or safety of oneself or others, whether or not such activity occurs on College property. Disruptive or disorderly conduct. Verbal abuse, and/or willful damage to the reputation or psychological wellbeing of any person. Conduct unbecoming of a Wheelock student, whether on or off the campus grounds. Damage or vandalism to College or personal property. Use of electronic devices to violate the privacy of the College community or its members. Failure to comply with the directives and sanctions of College officials acting in performance of their duties. Disrespect of a College official. Fighting, even when said fighting is mutually instigated. Violent behavior, whether physical, verbal, or threatened, directed toward property or persons. Other Violations Violation of the Visitors and Sign-In Policy. Gambling as defined by Massachusetts General Laws. Unauthorized possession or distribution of any mode of entrance to any College facility. Unauthorized presence in or forcible entry into a College facility or Collegerelated premises, including, but not limited to, College building roofs or fire escapes. Disposal of trash or refuse anywhere on the campus except in designated trash receptacles. Violations of the College Honor Code. Violations of the Climate of Respect. Violations of a “No Contact Order” Violation of any Trespass or Ban Order from any part of campus. Sanctions and Disciplinary Actions Considerations in Imposing Sanctions Discipline or sanctions, up to and including expulsion, may be taken in response to a Code of Conduct violation by a student. In determining appropriate discipline or sanctions, factors evaluated include, without limitation, the nature and severity of the violation, the degree to which the student has participated or been involved in the violation, his or her motive and intent in connection with the violation, and any record of past violations. These and other relevant factors of the specific situation will be considered. Sanctions or Disciplinary Alternatives The following examples of sanctions or disciplinary actions may be imposed separately or in combination. This list of sanctions or disciplinary actions is not exhaustive. The College 10 reserves the right to impose sanctions or disciplinary actions not listed below. No Action Official reprimand Mediation Parental Notification Disciplinary Notice Revocation of Privileges Counseling Educational Mandate Community Service Confiscation Restitution Probation (or any form thereof) Behavioral contract No contact order Campus ban Suspension Expulsion Judicial Information The following process will be followed to consider reports regarding alleged violations of the Code of Conduct. The goal of this process is to investigate the facts and circumstances of a report and, if appropriate, to impose sanctions or discipline warranted by those facts and circumstances. The Dean of Students and/or his or her designee will be responsible for enforcing the Code of Conduct. They will resolve any questions regarding the interpretation or application of the Code of Conduct. The determination of the Dean of Students and/or his or her designee concerning the interpretation or application of the Code of Conduct will be final. Report Any member of the College community may file an incident report against any Wheelock student by submitting in writing to the Office of Student Life the following information: The name(s) of the student(s) who is (are) the subject of the incident report. A clear explanation of the nature of the incident. The contact information of those filing the complaint. The contact information of witness(es). Dean of Students Preliminary Review When an incident is reported, the Dean of Students and/or his or her designee will investigate the facts and circumstances surrounding the incident. Following this investigation, he or she may elect to: (a) dismiss the matter; (b) mediate the incident; (c) mandate an appropriate sanction; or, (d) refer the incident to the Conduct Board. Prior to dismissing a matter, the Dean of Students and/or his or her designee may consult with other college officials if, in their judgment, such consultation is warranted. 11 In the case of what is determined to be a major violation, and depending on the severity of the offense and the student’s record of previous violations, students may be offered the choice to have conduct violations considered and adjudicated in an administrative hearing or before the Conduct Board. In the case of what is determined to be a minor violation, the incident will be adjudicated by an administrative hearing and not referred to the Conduct Board. Any students that are referred to an administrative hearing will be responsible to schedule a meeting with the Dean of Students and/or his or her designee within three (3) business days of notification. Students who do not schedule this meeting forfeit their right to an appeal. The decision to refer any matter to an administrative hearing or the Conduct Board will be determined at the discretion of the Dean of Students and/or his or her designee. Notification of Results of Review After the preliminary review, the student(s) who are the subject(s) of the incident report will be notified of the outcome by the Office of Student Life in a timely fashion. Provisions for Immediate Suspension When a student is considered to be a threat to another person (including himself or herself), property, or the orderly functioning of the College, the student may be suspended immediately by the Dean of Students or his or her designee, at his or her sole discretion, from a residence hall, the College, or both, without a hearing. This suspension will remain in effect until the Dean of Students or his or her designee determines that the threat no longer exists. The Dean of Students and/or his or her designee, at his or her sole discretion, may also impose sanctions or discipline short of suspension to address the particular situation. Conduct Board The role of the Conduct Board is to make specific findings as to whether the Code of Conduct has been violated and to recommend appropriate disciplinary sanctions. The Conduct Board exists to promote responsible and accountable behavior among students. The Conduct Board is a panel of students, faculty, and staff who come together to determine the facts surrounding a charge that a student has violated policy and arrive at a fair and informed resolution of the charge. In cases in which Code of Conduct violations have been found, the Board may, subject to the review and appeal process, recommend to the Dean of Students or his or her designee the imposition of sanctions or disciplinary actions. The Dean of Students and/or his or her designee will be responsible for enforcing or implementing those sanctions or disciplinary actions. Membership The Board will be comprised of Wheelock staff, faculty, and students appointed by the Dean of Students’ Office. A quorum of seven board members is required to hear each case, three of whom must be students. The Assistant Dean of Students or the Director of Residence Life will serve as the Conduct Board Chair at each scheduled meeting. All issues, findings, or sanctions in a case will be decided by majority vote. The Chairperson will facilitate all hearings and he or she will only vote in the event of a tie vote of the other board members. Board members may serve on the Conduct Board for a term of three years. 12 Notification of Hearing If a Conduct Board hearing is to be held, the student who is the subject of the hearing will be provided with detailed additional information about the hearing process in a meeting with the appropriate Office of Student Life staff member. Challenging a Board Member If the student who is the subject of the Conduct Board hearing believes that one or more members of the Board has a conflict of interest, he or she shall notify the Dean of Students immediately. The determination of the Dean of Students regarding whether any conflict of interest exists will be final. Advisors The student who is subject of the Conduct Board hearing may select one person who is a student, faculty, or staff member of the Wheelock College community to advise him or her through the hearing process. This advisor may not be a private attorney representing the student who is the subject of the Conduct Board hearing. The advisor may: advise the student in the preparation and presentation before the hearing; accompany the student to the hearing; advise the student at reasonable intervals during the hearing, at the sole discretion of the Chair of the Board. The advisor may not address the Board directly nor may the advisor question any witness. The student must inform the Dean of Students of the name of his or her advisor prior to the Board hearing. Board Recommendations At the conclusion of the hearing, the Board will decide by majority vote whether it believes that it is more likely than not that a violation of the Code of Conduct has occurred. If the Board decides that a violation has occurred, the Board will, by majority vote recommend specific sanctions or disciplinary actions to the Dean of Students. Notification of the Board Recommendation The Dean of Students and/or his or her designee will meet with the student who is the subject of the hearing to discuss the Board recommendation as soon as possible after the Board makes its recommendation. The meeting will be followed by a letter that confirms the Board recommendation and outlines the appeal procedures available to the student Appeal Process Appeals of conduct board recommendations or administrative hearings are heard only if the student can clearly demonstrate that procedures described in the Student Handbook have not been followed and/or if the student introduces substantive new evidence. Any such request should be made in writing to the Dean of Students within three business days of receiving notice of the Board recommendation. The Dean of Students and/or his or her designee will review the request and determine whether an appeal is granted and/or a new hearing held. The Dean of Students reserves the right to review sanctions and, if deemed appropriate, modify sanctions. In the event the sanctions are modified as a result of this review, additional hearings may be called. The College reserves the right to suspend housing privileges while an appeal is being 13 reviewed. Record Keeping All sanctions or disciplinary actions are recorded and maintained by the Office of Student Life. Dismissal from the College and suspension from the College are the only sanctions that will be noted on a student’s permanent record. The Dean of Students and/or his or her designee will determine the appropriate method for recording the information presented at a Board hearing. Confidentiality The College respects the rights of individual members of the Wheelock community. Therefore, every effort will be made to protect the confidentiality of the Student Conduct Board process. Content in the aforementioned section comes from the Wheelock College Student Handbook, found online at http://www.wheelock.edu/student-life/studenthandbook. ATTENDANCE Regular class attendance is expected of all students. Instructors of individual courses are expected to set forth clear expectations and consequences with regard to attendance. A student who, in the opinion of the instructor, has been absent from a course to an excessive degree and without any excuse may receive an academic warning. A student who has received a warning and continues to be absent may receive a failing grade in the course. For more information, please refer to the College Catalog and Wheelock College Student Handbook. CAMPUS COMPUTING POLICY Email is an official method of communicating at Wheelock College. The Office of Information Technology creates and issues a Wheelock email account to each student upon enrollment. Each student is notified, in writing, of his/her email address and receives instructions for accessing his/her email account. The Wheelock College Student Email Policy requires students to activate and utilize their Wheelock email accounts. The Policy was developed to set standards for communications between the College and its students, to ensure that all students have access to pertinent College information, and to ensure that administration, faculty, and staff of the College have a standardized method and a timely process for communications with students. Use of any electronic communication, including but not limited to the network, electronic mail, or social networking sites (i.e., Facebook or Twitter) for transmitting anonymous, rude, abusive, harassing or malicious messages is unethical and will result in disciplinary action. Communications sent to students’ Wheelock College email address may include notification of campus events, course selections and registration, and deadlines regarding financial aid and tuition bills. Although students may maintain separate email accounts, students are held accountable for information disseminated to their Wheelock College email addresses and are expected to check their Wheelock email regularly for College communications. Students who choose to have their Wheelock College email address forwarded to an alternate email address are also accountable for information communicated by the College via email. It is the student’s responsibility to read College email communications on a 14 regular basis and to take action in a timely manner, whenever appropriate. Questions regarding activation and usage of email accounts or this Policy should be directed to the Office of Information Technology at helpdesk@wheelock.edu or (617) 879-2309. ADDITIONAL POLICIES Information about the following academic policies may be found in the Wheelock College Student Handbook and at http://www.wheelock.edu/student-life/studenthandbook/academic-policies. ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Undergraduate and Graduate Grading Policies Wheelock College Literacy and Communication Policy (Undergraduate) Academic Warning, Probation, and Dismissal Minimum Academic Requirements for Students Receiving Financial Aid Academic Appeals Non-Matriculated Student Policy (Graduate) Length of Time in Program (Graduate) Withdrawal from the College Readmission to the College Academic Boards Academic Records Graduation Participation SUPPORT SERVICES FOR STUDENTS COMPASS What is COMPASS? Community Partnership for Student Success COMPASS is a comprehensive approach to student success designed to respond effectively to the needs of students by connecting them to the appropriate supports in the Wheelock community. What is a COMPASS Referral? The COMPASS referral is an important tool that creates opportunities for you to discuss your progress and utilize appropriate resources such as faculty, academic advisors, academic support, Student Life, Athletics, and the Counseling Center. This referral provides an opportunity for instructors and staff members to alert students, advisors, and the Student Success Office to concerns they have about students. What are my next steps? Read the COMPASS referral carefully Contact your instructor immediately to discuss her/his concerns Visit the ‘Academic Supports’ tab on MyWheelock for information about available academic support resources Mid-semester Evaluation This evaluation system provides faculty teaching undergraduate students the opportunity to report the progress of each student in their class at mid-semester (applies to full semester classes only). Each faculty member will use the grading system to enter a “grade” of “satisfactory” or “unsatisfactory” at the mid-term to indicate a student’s progress in meeting the goals and objectives of the class. The mid semester evaluation will also have a link to the MyCompass referral form if faculty wish to provide more detailed information or refer the 15 student for support services. Students and their Academic Advisors will be able to access the mid semester reports using the portal. Questions? Contact compass@wheelock.edu Students with Disabilities and Disability Support (617)879-2304 Wheelock College complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which ensures that qualified individuals, as defined by the law, will have equal access to and opportunity to participate in all programs of the College. For a detailed explanation of the Wheelock College non-discrimination policy as it relates to students with disabilities, please refer to the College Course Catalog or the Student Handbook. Students requiring disability services are encouraged to contact the Coordinator of Disability Services in the Office of Academic Advising Assistance (OAAA). The Coordinator will assist students in developing an appropriate plan of support and in learning to articulate their needs, become their own advocates, and use campus resources effectively. Auxiliary aids and services including modifications in examinations, course materials in alternative formats, readers, taped textbooks, note-taking assistance, sign language interpreters and tutoring may be provided. Students who require additional testing and those whose learning challenges have not been diagnosed are informed of the public and private network of diagnostic and counseling professionals within Massachusetts. Refer to: http://www.wheelock.edu/academics/academic-support-services/disability-services The Writing Program (617) 879-2122 The Wheelock College Writing Program consists of courses, support services, and literacy testing, all designed to assist Wheelock students with the writing they will be doing while at Wheelock and to prepare them for the writing they will be doing in both their careers and their roles as advocates for children and families. Refer to: http://www.wheelock.edu/academics/academic-support-services/writing-program The Counseling Center (617) 879-2413 The Wheelock College Counseling Center is staffed by professionally trained counselors who are available to discuss personal and academic issues with students. Typical issues include personal problems, family problems, and problems in relationships, sexuality, anxiety/depression, alcohol abuse, and academic difficulties. In addition to providing individual counseling, the Center organizes a variety of groups which focus on specific issues, such as adult children of alcoholics, students with divorced parents, and a support group for graduating seniors. It also provides students with information concerning off campus counseling and treatment resources. The Center for Career Development (617) 879-2257 The Center for Career Development provides numerous services to assist students and alumni at all stages of the career planning process. Included are career counseling and on campus recruiting. The Center also has maintains a web site http://www.wheelock.edu/ccd/index.asp which provides detailed information about 16 services and resources, guidelines for resume writing and interviewing, and helpful internet links. The Earl Center for Learning & Innovation (617) 879-2143 The Earl Center houses a workspace and a lending library for creative, hands-on materials used in working with children and families and provides individual instruction and workshops in the design and implementation of relevant activities. Refer to: http://www.wheelock.edu/library/earl-center INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD From time to time, students are requested by researchers of the College and other institutions to take part in human experimentation projects. These projects may provide useful information on behavioral, social, and psychological reactions. The College has created an Institutional Review Board (IRB) to oversee research that involves human subjects. Students participating in research that involve human subjects are required to obtain approval of the IRB prior to beginning any such research. Students should consult with the faculty member or administrator supervising their research and/or the College’s IRB Administrator to determine research reporting requirements and whether IRB approval is necessary. A copy of the IRB Procedures is available from the IRB Administrator and on the College website located here: http://www.wheelock.edu/academics/faculty-andadministration/institutional-review-board. 17 II. INTRODUCTION TO THE SOCIAL WORK PROFession Social work is the profession dedicated to helping individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities throughout the world. Its basic tenets are best conveyed in the preamble of The Code of Ethics of the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) (approved 1996, revised 1998, http://www.naswdc.org/pubs/code/code.asp). Preamble to The NASW Code of Ethics The primary mission of the social work profession is to enhance human well-being and help meet the basic human needs of all people, with particular attention to the needs and empowerment of people who are vulnerable, oppressed, and living in poverty. A historic and defining feature of social work is the profession’s focus on individual well-being in a social context and the well-being of society. Fundamental to social work is attention to the environmental forces that create, contribute to, and address problems in living. Social workers promote social justice and social change with and on behalf of clients. “Clients” is used inclusively to refer to individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. Social workers are sensitive to cultural and ethnic diversity and strive to end discrimination, oppression, poverty, and other forms of social injustice. These activities may be in the form of direct practice, community organizing, supervision, consultation administration, advocacy, social and political action, policy development and implementation, education, and research and evaluation. Social workers seek to enhance the capacity of people to address their own needs. Social workers also seek to promote the responsiveness of organizations, communities, and other social institutions to individuals’ needs and social problems. The mission of the social work profession is rooted in a set of core values. These core values, embraced by social workers throughout the profession’s history, are the foundation of social work’s unique purpose and perspective: service social justice dignity and worth of the person importance of human relationships integrity competence This constellation of core values reflects what is unique to the social work profession. Core values, and the principles that flow from them, must be balanced within the context and complexity of the human experience. Three documents that embody the values and mission of the profession of social work are included here: 1. 2. 18 The NASW Code of Ethics (Purpose, Ethical Principles, and Standards) delineates the values and ethics of the profession; The Universal Declaration of Human Rights articulates the principles of human rights and social/economic justice which the profession promotes; and 3. The Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards of the Council on Social Work Education provides the academic framework which underlies social work education and training. THE CODE OF ETHICS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS (NASW) Purpose of the NASW Code of Ethics: Professional ethics are at the core of social work. The profession has an obligation to articulate its basic values, ethical principles, and ethical standards. The NASW Code of Ethics sets forth these values, principles, and standards to guide social workers’ conduct. The Code is relevant to all social workers and social work students, regardless of their professional functions, the settings in which they work, or the populations they serve. The NASW Code of Ethics serves six purposes: 1. The Code identifies core values on which social work’s mission is based. 2. The Code summarizes broad ethical principles that reflect the profession’s core values and establishes a set of specific ethical standards that should be used to guide social work practice. 3. The Code is designed to help social workers identify relevant considerations when professional obligations conflict or ethical uncertainties arise. 4. The Code provides ethical standards to which the general public can hold the social work profession accountable. 5. The Code socializes practitioners new to the field to social work’s mission, values, ethical principles, and ethical standards. 6. The Code articulates standards that the social work profession itself can use to assess whether social workers have engaged in unethical conduct. NASW has formal procedures to adjudicate ethics complaints filed against its members. In subscribing to this Code, social workers are required to cooperate in its implementation, participate in NASW adjudication proceedings, and abide by any NASW disciplinary rulings or sanctions based on it. The Code offers a set of values, principles, and standards to guide decision making and conduct when ethical issues arise. It does not provide a set of rules that prescribe how social workers should act in all situations. Specific applications of the Code must take into account the context in which it is being considered and the possibility of conflicts among the Code‘s values, principles, and standards. Ethical responsibilities flow from all human relationships, from the personal and familial to the social and professional. Further, the NASW Code of Ethics does not specify which values, principles, and standards are most important and ought to outweigh others in instances when they conflict. Reasonable differences of opinion can and do exist among social workers with respect to the ways in which values, ethical principles, and ethical standards should be rank ordered when they conflict. Ethical decision making in a given situation must apply the informed judgment of the individual social worker and should also consider how the issues would be judged in a peer review process where the ethical standards of the profession would be applied. Ethical decision making is a process. There are many instances in social work where 19 simple answers are not available to resolve complex ethical issues. Social workers should take into consideration all the values, principles, and standards in this Code that are relevant to any situation in which ethical judgment is warranted. Social workers’ decisions and actions should be consistent with the spirit as well as the letter of this Code. In addition to this Code, there are many other sources of information about ethical thinking that may be useful. Social workers should consider ethical theory and principles generally, social work theory and research, laws, regulations, agency policies, and other relevant codes of ethics, recognizing that among codes of ethics social workers should consider the NASW Code of Ethics as their primary source. Social workers also should be aware of the impact on ethical decision making of their clients’ and their own personal values and cultural and religious beliefs and practices. They should be aware of any conflicts between personal and professional values and deal with them responsibly. For additional guidance social workers should consult the relevant literature on professional ethics and ethical decision making and seek appropriate consultation when faced with ethical dilemmas. This may involve consultation with an agency based or social work organization’s ethics committee, a regulatory body, knowledgeable colleagues, supervisors, or legal counsel. Instances may arise when social workers’ ethical obligations conflict with agency policies or relevant laws or regulations. When such conflicts occur, social workers must make a responsible effort to resolve the conflict in a manner that is consistent with the values, principles, and standards expressed in this Code. If a reasonable resolution of the conflict does not appear possible, social workers should seek proper consultation before making a decision. The NASW Code of Ethics is to be used by NASW and by individuals, agencies, organizations, and bodies (such as licensing and regulatory boards, professional liability insurance providers, courts of law, agency boards of directors, government agencies, and other professional groups) that choose to adopt it or use it as a frame of reference. Violation of standards in this Code does not automatically imply legal liability or violation of the law. Such determination can only be made in the context of legal and judicial proceedings. Alleged violations of the Code would be subject to a peer review process. Such processes are generally separate from legal or administrative procedures and insulated from legal review or proceedings to allow the profession to counsel and discipline its own members. A code of ethics cannot guarantee ethical behavior. Moreover, a code of ethics cannot resolve all ethical issues or disputes or capture the richness and complexity involved in striving to make responsible choices within a moral community. Rather, a code of ethics sets forth values, ethical principles, and ethical standards to which professionals aspire and by which their actions can be judged. Social workers’ ethical behavior should result from their personal commitment to engage in ethical practice. The NASW Code of Ethics reflects the commitment of all social workers to uphold the profession’s values and to act ethically. Principles and standards must be applied by individuals of good character who discern moral questions and, in good faith, seek to make reliable ethical judgments. 20 Ethical Principles The following broad ethical principles are based on social work’s core values of service, social justice, dignity and worth of the person, importance of human relationships, integrity, and competence. These principles set forth ideals to which all social workers should aspire. Value: Service Ethical Principle: Social workers’ primary goal is to help people in need and to address social problems. Social workers elevate service to others above self-interest. Social workers draw on their knowledge, values, and skills to help people in need and to address social problems. Social workers are encouraged to volunteer some portion of their professional skills with no expectation of significant financial return (pro bono service). Value: Social Justice Ethical Principle: Social workers challenge social injustice. Social workers pursue social change, particularly with and on behalf of vulnerable and oppressed individuals and groups of people. Social workers’ social change efforts are focused primarily on issues of poverty, unemployment, discrimination, and other forms of social injustice. These activities seek to promote sensitivity to and knowledge about oppression and cultural and ethnic diversity. Social workers strive to ensure access to needed information, services, and resources; equality of opportunity; and meaningful participation in decision making for all people. Value: Dignity and Worth of the Person Ethical Principle: Social workers respect the inherent dignity and worth of the person. Social workers treat each person in a caring and respectful fashion, mindful of individual differences and cultural and ethnic diversity. Social workers promote clients’ socially responsible self-determination. Social workers seek to enhance clients’ capacity and opportunity to change and to address their own needs. Social workers are cognizant of their dual responsibility to clients and to the broader society. They seek to resolve conflicts between clients’ interests and the broader society’s interests in a socially responsible manner consistent with the values, ethical principles, and ethical standards of the profession. Value: Importance of Human Relationships Ethical Principle: Social workers recognize the central importance of human relationships. Social workers understand that relationships between and among people are an important vehicle for change. Social workers engage people as partners in the helping process. Social workers seek to strengthen relationships among people in a purposeful effort to promote, restore, maintain, and enhance the well-being of individuals, families, social groups, organizations, and communities. Value: Integrity Ethical Principle: Social workers behave in a trustworthy manner. Social workers are continually aware of the profession’s mission, values, ethical principles, and ethical standards and practice in a manner consistent with them. Social workers act 21 honestly and responsibly and promote ethical practices on the part of the organizations with which they are affiliated. Value: Competence Ethical Principle: Social workers practice within their areas of competence and develop and enhance their professional expertise. Social workers continually strive to increase their professional knowledge and skills and to apply them in practice. Social workers should aspire to contribute to the knowledge base of the profession. Ethical Standards The following ethical standards are relevant to the professional activities of all social workers. These standards concern (1) social workers’ ethical responsibilities to clients, (2) social workers’ ethical responsibilities to colleagues, (3) social workers’ ethical responsibilities in practice settings, (4) social workers’ ethical responsibilities as professionals, (5) social workers’ ethical responsibilities to the social work profession, and (6) social workers’ ethical responsibilities to the broader society. Some of the standards that follow are enforceable guidelines for professional conduct, and some are aspirational. The extent to which each standard is enforceable is a matter of professional judgment to be exercised by those responsible for reviewing alleged violations of ethical standards. 1. Social Workers’ Ethical Responsibilities to Clients 1.1 Commitment to Clients Social workers’ primary responsibility is to promote the well- being of clients. In general, clients’ interests are primary. However, social workers’ responsibility to the larger society or specific legal obligations may on limited occasions supersede the loyalty owed clients, and clients should be so advised. (Examples include when a social worker is required by law to report that a client has abused a child or has threatened to harm self or others.) 1.2 Self-Determination Social workers respect and promote the right of clients to selfdetermination and assist clients in their efforts to identify and clarify their goals. Social workers may limit clients’ right to self-determination when, in the social workers’ professional judgment, clients’ actions or potential actions pose a serious, foreseeable, and imminent risk to themselves or others. 1.3 Informed Consent (a) Social workers should provide services to clients only in the context of a professional relationship based, when appropriate, on valid informed consent. Social workers should use clear and understandable language to inform clients of the purpose of the services, risks related to the services, limits to services because of the requirements of a third- party payer, relevant costs, reasonable alternatives, clients’ right to refuse or withdraw consent, and the time frame covered by the consent. Social workers should provide clients with an opportunity to ask questions. 22 (b) In instances when clients are not literate or have difficulty understanding the primary language used in the practice setting, social workers should take steps to ensure clients’ comprehension. This may include providing clients with a detailed verbal explanation or arranging for a qualified interpreter or translator whenever possible. (c) In instances when clients lack the capacity to provide informed consent, social workers should protect clients’ interests by seeking permission from an appropriate third party, informing clients consistent with the clients’ level of understanding. In such instances social workers should seek to ensure that the third party acts in a manner consistent with clients’ wishes and interests. Social workers should take reasonable steps to enhance such clients’ ability to give informed consent. (d) In instances when clients are receiving services involuntarily, social workers should provide information about the nature and extent of services and about the extent of clients’ right to refuse service. (e) Social workers who provide services via electronic media (such as computer, telephone, radio, and television) should inform recipients of the limitations and risks associated with such services. (f) Social workers should obtain clients’ informed consent before audiotaping or videotaping clients or permitting observation of services to clients by a third party. 1.4 Competence (a) Social workers should provide services and represent themselves as competent only within the boundaries of their education, training, license, certification, consultation received, supervised experience, or other relevant professional experience. (b) Social workers should provide services in substantive areas or use intervention techniques or approaches that are new to them only after engaging in appropriate study, training, consultation, and supervision from people who are competent in those interventions or techniques. (c) When generally recognized standards do not exist with respect to an emerging area of practice, social workers should exercise careful judgment and take responsible steps (including appropriate education, research, training, consultation, and supervision) to ensure the competence of their work and to protect clients from harm. 1.5 Cultural Competence and Social Diversity (a) Social workers should understand culture and its function in human behavior and society, recognizing the strengths that exist in all cultures. (b) Social workers should have a knowledge base of their clients’ cultures and be able to demonstrate competence in the provision of services that are sensitive to clients’ cultures 23 and to differences among people and cultural groups. (c) Social workers should obtain education about and seek to understand the nature of social diversity and oppression with respect to race, ethnicity, national origin, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, marital status, political belief, religion, immigration status, and mental or physical disability. 1.6 Conflicts of Interest (a) Social workers should be alert to and avoid conflicts of interest that interfere with the exercise of professional discretion and impartial judgment. Social workers should inform clients when a real or potential conflict of interest arises and take reasonable steps to resolve the issue in a manner that makes the clients’ interests primary and protects clients’ interests to the greatest extent possible. In some cases, protecting clients’ interests may require termination of the professional relationship with proper referral of the client. (b) Social workers should not take unfair advantage of any professional relationship or exploit others to further their personal, religious, political, or business interests. (c) Social workers should not engage in dual or multiple relationships with clients or former clients in which there is a risk of exploitation or potential harm to the client. In instances when dual or multiple relationships are unavoidable, social workers should take steps to protect clients and are responsible for setting clear, appropriate, and culturally sensitive boundaries. (Dual or multiple relationships occur when social workers relate to clients in more than one relationship, whether professional, social, or business. Dual or multiple relationships can occur simultaneously or consecutively.) (d) When social workers provide services to two or more people who have a relationship with each other (for example, couples, family members), social workers should clarify with all parties which individuals will be considered clients and the nature of social workers’ professional obligations to the various individuals who are receiving services. Social workers who anticipate a conflict of interest among the individuals receiving services or who anticipate having to perform in potentially conflicting roles (for example, when a social worker is asked to testify in a child custody dispute or divorce proceedings involving clients) should clarify their role with the parties involved and take appropriate action to minimize any conflict of interest. 1.7 Privacy and Confidentiality (a) Social workers should respect clients’ right to privacy. Social workers should not solicit private information from clients unless it is essential to providing services or conducting social work evaluation or research. Once private information is shared, standards of confidentiality apply. (b) Social workers may disclose confidential information when appropriate with valid consent from a client or a person legally authorized to consent on behalf of a client. (c) Social workers should protect the confidentiality of all information obtained in the 24 course of professional service, except for compelling professional reasons. The general expectation that social workers will keep information confidential does not apply when disclosure is necessary to prevent serious, foreseeable, and imminent harm to a client or other identifiable person. In all instances, social workers should disclose the least amount of confidential information necessary to achieve the desired purpose; only information that is directly relevant to the purpose for which the disclosure is made should be revealed. (d) Social workers should inform clients, to the extent possible, about the disclosure of confidential information and the potential consequences, when feasible before the disclosure is made. This applies whether social workers disclose confidential information on the basis of a legal requirement or client consent. (e) Social workers should discuss with clients and other interested parties the nature of confidentiality and limitations of clients’ right to confidentiality. Social workers should review with clients circumstances where confidential information may be requested and where disclosure of confidential information may be legally required. This discussion should occur as soon as possible in the social worker-client relationship and as needed throughout the course of the relationship. (f) When social workers provide counseling services to families, couples, or groups, social workers should seek agreement among the parties involved concerning each individual’s right to confidentiality and obligation to preserve the confidentiality of information shared by others. Social workers should inform participants in family, couples, or group counseling that social workers cannot guarantee that all participants will honor such agreements. (g) Social workers should inform clients involved in family, couples, marital, or group counseling of the social worker’s, employer’s, and agency’s policy concerning the social worker’s disclosure of confidential information among the parties involved in the counseling. (h) Social workers should not disclose confidential information to third-party payers unless clients have authorized such disclosure. (i) Social workers should not discuss confidential information in any setting unless privacy can be ensured. Social workers should not discuss confidential information in public or semipublic areas such as hallways, waiting rooms, elevators, and restaurants. (j) Social workers should protect the confidentiality of clients during legal proceedings to the extent permitted by law. When a court of law or other legally authorized body orders social workers to disclose confidential or privileged information without a client’s consent and such disclosure could cause harm to the client, social workers should request that the court withdraw the order or limit the order as narrowly as possible or maintain the records under seal, unavailable for public inspection. 25 (k) Social workers should protect the confidentiality of clients when responding to requests from members of the media. (l) Social workers should protect the confidentiality of clients’ written and electronic records and other sensitive information. Social workers should take reasonable steps to ensure that clients’ records are stored in a secure location and that clients’ records are not available to others who are not authorized to have access. (m) Social workers should take precautions to ensure and maintain the confidentiality of information transmitted to other parties through the use of computers, electronic mail, facsimile machines, telephones and telephone answering machines, and other electronic or computer technology. Disclosure of identifying information should be avoided whenever possible. (n) Social workers should transfer or dispose of clients’ records in a manner that protects clients’ confidentiality and is consistent with state statutes governing records and social work licensure. (o) Social workers should take reasonable precautions to protect client confidentiality in the event of the social worker’s termination of practice, incapacitation, or death. (p) Social workers should not disclose identifying information when discussing clients for teaching or training purposes unless the client has consented to disclosure of confidential information. (q) Social workers should not disclose identifying information when discussing clients with consultants unless the client has consented to disclosure of confidential information or there is a compelling need for such disclosure. (r) Social workers should protect the confidentiality of deceased clients consistent with the preceding standards. 1.8 Access to Records (a) Social workers should provide clients with reasonable access to records concerning the clients. Social workers who are concerned that clients’ access to their records could cause serious misunderstanding or harm to the client should provide assistance in interpreting the records and consultation with the client regarding the records. Social workers should limit clients’ access to their records, or portions of their records, only in exceptional circumstances when there is compelling evidence that such access would cause serious harm to the client. Both clients’ requests and the rationale for withholding some or all of the record should be documented in clients’ files. (b) When providing clients with access to their records, social workers should take steps to protect the confidentiality of other individuals identified or discussed in such records. 26 1.9 Sexual Relationships (a) Social workers should under no circumstances engage in sexual activities or sexual contact with current clients, whether such contact is consensual or forced. (b) Social workers should not engage in sexual activities or sexual contact with clients’ relatives or other individuals with whom clients maintain a close personal relationship when there is a risk of exploitation or potential harm to the client. Sexual activity or sexual contact with clients’ relatives or other individuals with whom clients maintain a personal relationship has the potential to be harmful to the client and may make it difficult for the social worker and client to maintain appropriate professional boundaries. Social workers—not their clients, their clients’ relatives, or other individuals with whom the client maintains a personal relationship—assume the full burden for setting clear, appropriate, and culturally sensitive boundaries. (c) Social workers should not engage in sexual activities or sexual contact with former clients because of the potential for harm to the client. If social workers engage in conduct contrary to this prohibition or claim that an exception to this prohibition is warranted because of extraordinary circumstances, it is social workers—not their clients—who assume the full burden of demonstrating that the former client has not been exploited, coerced, or manipulated, intentionally or unintentionally. (d) Social workers should not provide clinical services to individuals with whom they have had a prior sexual relationship. Providing clinical services to a former sexual partner has the potential to be harmful to the individual and is likely to make it difficult for the social worker and individual to maintain appropriate professional boundaries. 1.10 Physical Contact Social workers should not engage in physical contact with clients when there is a possibility of psychological harm to the client as a result of the contact (such as cradling or caressing clients). Social workers who engage in appropriate physical contact with clients are responsible for setting clear, appropriate, and culturally sensitive boundaries that govern such physical contact. 1.11 Sexual Harassment Social workers should not sexually harass clients. Sexual harassment includes sexual advances, sexual solicitation, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature. 1.12 Derogatory Language Social workers should not use derogatory language in their written or verbal communications to or about clients. Social workers should use accurate and respectful language in all communications to and about clients. 1.13 Payment for Services (a) When setting fees, social workers should ensure that the fees are fair, reasonable, and commensurate with the services performed. Consideration should be given to clients’ ability to pay. (b) Social workers should avoid accepting goods or services from clients as payment for 27 professional services. Bartering arrangements, particularly involving services, create the potential for conflicts of interest, exploitation, and inappropriate boundaries in social workers’ relationships with clients. Social workers should explore and may participate in bartering only in very limited circumstances when it can be demonstrated that such arrangements are an accepted practice among professionals in the local community, considered to be essential for the provision of services, negotiated without coercion, and entered into at the client’s initiative and with the client’s informed consent. Social workers who accept goods or services from clients as payment for professional services assume the full burden of demonstrating that this arrangement will not be detrimental to the client or the professional relationship. (c) Social workers should not solicit a private fee or other remuneration for providing services to clients who are entitled to such available services through the social workers’ employer or agency. 1.14 Clients Who Lack Decision- Making Capacity When social workers act on behalf of clients who lack the capacity to make informed decisions, social workers should take reasonable steps to safeguard the interests and rights of those clients. 1.15 Interruption of Services Social workers should make reasonable efforts to ensure continuity of services in the event that services are interrupted by factors such as unavailability, relocation, illness, disability, or death. 1.16 Termination of Services (a) Social workers should terminate services to clients and professional relationships with them when such services and relationships are no longer required or no longer serve the clients’ needs or interests. (b) Social workers should take reasonable steps to avoid abandoning clients who are still in need of services. Social workers should withdraw services precipitously only under unusual circumstances, giving careful consideration to all factors in the situation and taking care to minimize possible adverse effects. Social workers should assist in making appropriate arrangements for continuation of services when necessary. (c) Social workers in fee-for-service settings may terminate services to clients who are not paying an overdue balance if the financial contractual arrangements have been made clear to the client, if the client does not pose an imminent danger to self or others, and if the clinical and other consequences of the current nonpayment have been addressed and discussed with the client. (d) Social workers should not terminate services to pursue a social, financial, or sexual relationship with a client. (e) Social workers who anticipate the termination or interruption of services to clients should notify clients promptly and seek the transfer, referral, or continuation of services in relation to the clients’ needs and preferences. 28 (f) Social workers who are leaving an employment setting should inform clients of appropriate options for the continuation of services and of the benefits and risks of the options. 2. SOCIAL WORKERS’ ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES TO COLLEAGUES 2.1 Respect (a) Social workers should treat colleagues with respect and should represent accurately and fairly the qualifications, views, and obligations of colleagues. (b) Social workers should avoid unwarranted negative criticism of colleagues in communications with clients or with other professionals. Unwarranted negative criticism may include demeaning comments that refer to colleagues’ level of competence or to individuals’ attributes such as race, ethnicity, national origin, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, marital status, political belief, religion, immigration status, and mental or physical disability. (c) Social workers should cooperate with social work colleagues and with colleagues of other professions when such cooperation serves the well-being of clients. 2.2 Confidentiality Social workers should respect confidential information shared by colleagues in the course of their professional relationships and transactions. Social workers should ensure that such colleagues understand social workers’ obligation to respect confidentiality and any exceptions related to it. 2.3 Interdisciplinary Collaboration (a) Social workers who are members of an interdisciplinary team should participate in and contribute to decisions that affect the well-being of clients by drawing on the perspectives, values, and experiences of the social work profession. Professional and ethical obligations of the interdisciplinary team as a whole and of its individual members should be clearly established. (b) Social workers for whom a team decision raises ethical concerns should attempt to resolve the disagreement through appropriate channels. If the disagreement cannot be resolved, social workers should pursue other avenues to address their concerns consistent with client well-being. 2.4 Disputes Involving Colleagues (a) Social workers should not take advantage of a dispute between a colleague and an employer to obtain a position or otherwise advance the social workers’ own interests. (b) Social workers should not exploit clients in disputes with colleagues or engage clients in any inappropriate discussion of conflicts between social workers and their colleagues. 2.5 Consultation (a) Social workers should seek the advice and counsel of 29 colleagues whenever such consultation is in the best interests of clients. (b) Social workers should keep themselves informed about colleagues’ areas of expertise and competencies. Social workers should seek consultation only from colleagues who have demonstrated knowledge, expertise, and competence related to the subject of the consultation. (c) When consulting with colleagues about clients, social workers should disclose the least amount of information necessary to achieve the purposes of the consultation. 2.6 Referral for Services (a) Social workers should refer clients to other professionals when the other professionals’ specialized knowledge or expertise is needed to serve clients fully or when social workers believe that they are not being effective or making reasonable progress with clients and that additional service is required. (b) Social workers who refer clients to other professionals should take appropriate steps to facilitate an orderly transfer of responsibility. Social workers who refer clients to other professionals should disclose, with clients’ consent, all pertinent information to the new service providers. (c) Social workers are prohibited from giving or receiving payment for a referral when no professional service is provided by the referring social worker. 2.7 Sexual Relationships (a) Social workers who function as supervisors or educators should not engage in sexual activities or contact with supervisees, students, trainees, or other colleagues over whom they exercise professional authority. (b) Social workers should avoid engaging in sexual relationships with colleagues when there is potential for a conflict of interest. Social workers who become involved in, or anticipate becoming involved in, a sexual relationship with a colleague have a duty to transfer professional responsibilities, when necessary, to avoid a conflict of interest. 2.8 Sexual Harassment Social workers should not sexually harass supervisees, students, trainees, or colleagues. Sexual harassment includes sexual advances, sexual solicitation, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature. 2.9 Impairment of Colleagues (a) Social workers who have direct knowledge of a social work colleague’s impairment that is due to personal problems, psychosocial distress, substance abuse, or mental health difficulties and that interferes with practice effectiveness should consult with that colleague when feasible and assist the colleague in taking remedial action. (b) Social workers who believe that a social work colleague’s impairment interferes with practice effectiveness and that the colleague has not taken adequate steps to address the impairment should take action through appropriate channels established by employers, 30 agencies, NASW, licensing and regulatory bodies, and other professional organizations. 2.10 Incompetence of Colleagues (a) Social workers who have direct knowledge of a social work colleague’s incompetence should consult with that colleague when feasible and assist the colleague in taking remedial action. (b) Social workers who believe that a social work colleague is incompetent and has not taken adequate steps to address the incompetence should take action through appropriate channels established by employers, agencies, NASW, licensing and regulatory bodies, and other professional organizations. 2.11 Unethical Conduct of Colleagues (a) Social workers should take adequate measures to discourage, prevent, expose, and correct the unethical conduct of colleagues. (b) Social workers should be knowledgeable about established policies and procedures for handling concerns about colleagues’ unethical behavior. Social workers should be familiar with national, state, and local procedures for handling ethics complaints. These include policies and procedures created by NASW, licensing and regulatory bodies, employers, agencies, and other professional organizations. (c) Social workers who believe that a colleague has acted unethically should seek resolution by discussing their concerns with the colleague when feasible and when such discussion is likely to be productive. (d) When necessary, social workers who believe that a colleague has acted unethically should take action through appropriate formal channels (such as contacting a state licensing board or regulatory body, an NASW committee on inquiry, or other professional ethics committees). (e) Social workers should defend and assist colleagues who are unjustly charged with unethical conduct. 3. Social Workers Ethical Responsibilities in Practice Settings 3.1 Supervision and Consultation (a) Social workers who provide supervision or consultation should have the necessary knowledge and skill to supervise or consult appropriately and should do so only within their areas of knowledge and competence. (b) Social workers who provide supervision or consultation are responsible for setting clear, appropriate, and culturally sensitive boundaries. (c) Social workers should not engage in any dual or multiple relationships with supervisees in which there is a risk of exploitation of or potential harm to the supervisee. 31 (d) Social workers who provide supervision should evaluate supervisees’ performance in a manner that is fair and respectful. 3.2 Education and Training (a) Social workers who function as educators, field instructors for students, or trainers should provide instruction only within their areas of knowledge and competence and should provide instruction based on the most current information and knowledge available in the profession. (b) Social workers who function as educators or field instructors for students should evaluate students’ performance in a manner that is fair and respectful. (c) Social workers who function as educators or field instructors for students should take reasonable steps to ensure that clients are routinely informed when services are being provided by students. (d) Social workers who function as educators or field instructors for students should not engage in any dual or multiple relationships with students in which there is a risk of exploitation or potential harm to the student. Social work educators and field instructors are responsible for setting clear, appropriate, and culturally sensitive boundaries. 3.3 Performance Evaluation Social workers who have responsibility for evaluating the performance of others should fulfill such responsibility in a fair and considerate manner and on the basis of clearly stated criteria. 3.4 Client Records (a) Social workers should take reasonable steps to ensure that documentation in records is accurate and reflects the services provided. (b) Social workers should include sufficient and timely documentation in records to facilitate the delivery of services and to ensure continuity of services provided to clients in the future. (c) Social workers’ documentation should protect clients’ privacy to the extent that is possible and appropriate and should include only information that is directly relevant to the delivery of services. (d) Social workers should store records following the termination of services to ensure reasonable future access. Records should be maintained for the number of years required by state statutes or relevant contracts. 3.5 Billing Social workers should establish and maintain billing practices that accurately reflect the nature and extent of services provided and that identify who provided the service in the practice setting. 32 3.6 Client Transfer (a) When an individual who is receiving services from another agency or colleague contacts a social worker for services, the social worker should carefully consider the client’s needs before agreeing to provide services. To minimize possible confusion and conflict, social workers should discuss with potential clients the nature of the clients’ current relationship with other service providers and the implications, including possible benefits or risks, of entering into a relationship with a new service provider. (b) If a new client has been served by another agency or colleague, social workers should discuss with the client whether consultation with the previous service provider is in the client’s best interest. 3.7 Administration (a) Social work administrators should advocate within and outside their agencies for adequate resources to meet clients’ needs. (b) Social workers should advocate for resource allocation procedures that are open and fair. When not all clients’ needs can be met, an allocation procedure should be developed that is nondiscriminatory and based on appropriate and consistently applied principles. (c) Social workers who are administrators should take reasonable steps to ensure that adequate agency or organizational resources are available to provide appropriate staff supervision. (d) Social work administrators should take reasonable steps to ensure that the working environment for which they are responsible is consistent with and encourages compliance with the NASW Code of Ethics. Social work administrators should take reasonable steps to eliminate any conditions in their organizations that violate, interfere with, or discourage compliance with the Code. 3.8 Continuing Education and Staff Development Social work administrators and supervisors should take reasonable steps to provide or arrange for continuing education and staff development for all staff for which they are responsible. Continuing education and staff development should address current knowledge and emerging developments related to social work practice and ethics. 3.9 Commitments to Employers (a) Social workers generally should adhere to commitments made to employers and employing organizations. (b) Social workers should work to improve employing agencies’ policies and procedures and the efficiency and effectiveness of their services. (c) Social workers should take reasonable steps to ensure that employers are aware of social workers’ ethical obligations as set forth in the NASW Code of Ethics and of the 33 implications of those obligations for social work practice. (d) Social workers should not allow an employing organization’s policies, procedures, regulations, or administrative orders to interfere with their ethical practice of social work. Social workers should take reasonable steps to ensure that their employing organizations’ practices are consistent with the NASW Code of Ethics. (e) Social workers should act to prevent and eliminate discrimination in the employing organization’s work assignments and in its employment policies and practices. (f) Social workers should accept employment or arrange student field placements only in organizations that exercise fair personnel practices. (g) Social workers should be diligent stewards of the resources of their employing organizations, wisely conserving funds where appropriate and never misappropriating funds or using them for unintended purposes. 3.10 Labor Management Disputes (a) Social workers may engage in organized action, including the formation of and participation in labor unions, to improve services to clients and working conditions. (b) The actions of social workers who are involved in labor management disputes, job actions, or labor strikes should be guided by the profession’s values, ethical principles, and ethical standards. Reasonable differences of opinion exist among social workers concerning their primary obligation as professionals during an actual or threatened labor strike or job action. Social workers should carefully examine relevant issues and their possible impact on clients before deciding on a course of action. 4. Social Workers’ Ethical Responsibilities as Professionals 4.1 Competence (a) Social workers should accept responsibility or employment only on the basis of existing competence or the intention to acquire the necessary competence. (b) Social workers should strive to become and remain proficient in professional practice and the performance of professional functions. Social workers should critically examine and keep current with emerging knowledge relevant to social work. Social workers should routinely review the professional literature and participate in continuing education relevant to social work practice and social work ethics. (c) Social workers should base practice on recognized knowledge, including empirically based knowledge, relevant to social work and social work ethics. 4.2 Discrimination Social workers should not practice, condone, facilitate, or 34 collaborate with any form of discrimination on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, marital status, political belief, religion, immigration status, or mental or physical disability. 4.3 Private Conduct Social workers should not permit their private conduct to interfere with their ability to fulfill their professional responsibilities. 4.4 Dishonesty, Fraud, and Deception Social workers should not participate in, condone, or be associated with dishonesty, fraud, or deception. 4.5 Impairment (a) Social workers should not allow their own personal problems, psychosocial distress, legal problems, substance abuse, or mental health difficulties to interfere with their professional judgment and performance or to jeopardize the best interests of people for whom they have a professional responsibility. (b) Social workers whose personal problems, psychosocial distress, legal problems, substance abuse, or mental health difficulties interfere with their professional judgment and performance should immediately seek consultation and take appropriate remedial action by seeking professional help, making adjustments in workload, terminating practice, or taking any other steps necessary to protect clients and others. 4.6 Misrepresentation (a) Social workers should make clear distinctions between statements made and actions engaged in as a private individual and as a representative of the social work profession, a professional social work organization, or the social worker’s employing agency. (b) Social workers who speak on behalf of professional social work organizations should accurately represent the official and authorized positions of the organizations. (c) Social workers should ensure that their representations to clients, agencies, and the public of professional qualifications, credentials, education, competence, affiliations, services provided, or results to be achieved are accurate. Social workers should claim only those relevant professional credentials they actually possess and take steps to correct any inaccuracies or misrepresentations of their credentials by others. 4.7 Solicitations (a) Social workers should not engage in uninvited solicitation of potential clients who, because of their circumstances, are vulnerable to undue influence, manipulation, or coercion. (b) Social workers should not engage in solicitation of testimonial endorsements (including solicitation of consent to use a client’s prior statement as a testimonial endorsement) from current clients or from other people who, because of their particular circumstances, are vulnerable to undue influence. 35 4.8 Acknowledging Credit (a) Social workers should take responsibility and credit, including authorship credit, only for work they have actually performed and to which they have contributed. (b) Social workers should honestly acknowledge the work of and the contributions made by others. 5. Social Workers’ Ethical Responsibilities to the Social Work Profession 5.1 Integrity of the Profession (a) Social workers should work toward the maintenance and promotion of high standards of practice. (b) Social workers should uphold and advance the values, ethics, knowledge, and mission of the profession. Social workers should protect, enhance, and improve the integrity of the profession through appropriate study and research, active discussion, and responsible criticism of the profession. (c) Social workers should contribute time and professional expertise to activities that promote respect for the value, integrity, and competence of the social work profession. These activities may include teaching, research, consultation, service, legislative testimony, presentations in the community, and participation in their professional organizations. (d) Social workers should contribute to the knowledge base of social work and share with colleagues their knowledge related to practice, research, and ethics. Social workers should seek to contribute to the profession’s literature and to share their knowledge at professional meetings and conferences. (e) Social workers should act to prevent the unauthorized and unqualified practice of social work. 5.2 Evaluation and Research (a) Social workers should monitor and evaluate policies, the implementation of programs, and practice interventions. (b) Social workers should promote and facilitate evaluation and research to contribute to the development of knowledge. (c) Social workers should critically examine and keep current with emerging knowledge relevant to social work and fully use evaluation and research evidence in their professional practice. (d) Social workers engaged in evaluation or research should carefully consider possible consequences and should follow guidelines developed for the protection of evaluation and research participants. Appropriate institutional review boards should be consulted. 36 (e) Social workers engaged in evaluation or research should obtain voluntary and written informed consent from participants, when appropriate, without any implied or actual deprivation or penalty for refusal to participate; without undue inducement to participate; and with due regard for participants’ well-being, privacy, and dignity. Informed consent should include information about the nature, extent, and duration of the participation requested and disclosure of the risks and benefits of participation in the research. (f) When evaluation or research participants are incapable of giving informed consent, social workers should provide an appropriate explanation to the participants, obtain the participants’ assent to the extent they are able, and obtain written consent from an appropriate proxy. (g) Social workers should never design or conduct evaluation or research that does not use consent procedures, such as certain forms of naturalistic observation and archival research, unless rigorous and responsible review of the research has found it to be justified because of its prospective scientific, educational, or applied value and unless equally effective alternative procedures that do not involve waiver of consent are not feasible. (h) Social workers should inform participants of their right to withdraw from evaluation and research at any time without penalty. (i) Social workers should take appropriate steps to ensure that participants in evaluation and research have access to appropriate supportive services. (j) Social workers engaged in evaluation or research should protect participants from unwarranted physical or mental distress, harm, danger, or deprivation. (k) Social workers engaged in the evaluation of services should discuss collected information only for professional purposes and only with people professionally concerned with this information. (l) Social workers engaged in evaluation or research should ensure the anonymity or confidentiality of participants and of the data obtained from them. Social workers should inform participants of any limits of confidentiality, the measures that will be taken to ensure confidentiality, and when any records containing research data will be destroyed. (m) Social workers who report evaluation and research results should protect participants’ confidentiality by omitting identifying information unless proper consent has been obtained authorizing disclosure. (n) Social workers should report evaluation and research findings accurately. They should not fabricate or falsify results and should take steps to correct any errors later found in published data using standard publication methods. 37 (o) Social workers engaged in evaluation or research should be alert to and avoid conflicts of interest and dual relationships with participants, should inform participants when a real or potential conflict of interest arises, and should take steps to resolve the issue in a manner that makes participants’ interests primary. (p) Social workers should educate themselves, their students, and their colleagues about responsible research practices. 6. Social Workers; Ethical Responsibilities to the Broader Society 6.1 Social Welfare Social workers should promote the general welfare of society, from local to global levels, and the development of people, their communities, and their environments. Social workers should advocate for living conditions conducive to the fulfillment of basic human needs and should promote social, economic, political, and cultural values and institutions that are compatible with the realization of social justice. 6.2 Public Participation Social workers should facilitate informed participation by the public in shaping social policies and institutions. 6.3 Public Emergencies Social workers should provide appropriate professional services in public emergencies to the greatest extent possible. 6.4 Social and Political Action (a) Social workers should engage in social and political action that seeks to ensure that all people have equal access to the resources, employment, services, and opportunities they require to meet their basic human needs and to develop fully. Social workers should be aware of the impact of the political arena on practice and should advocate for changes in policy and legislation to improve social conditions in order to meet basic human needs and promote social justice. (b) Social workers should act to expand choice and opportunity for all people, with special regard for vulnerable, disadvantaged, oppressed, and exploited people and groups. (c) Social workers should promote conditions that encourage respect for cultural and social diversity within the United States and globally. Social workers should promote policies and practices that demonstrate respect for difference, support the expansion of cultural knowledge and resources, advocate for programs and institutions that demonstrate cultural competence, and promote policies that safeguard the rights of and confirm equity and social justice for all people. (d) Social workers should act to prevent and eliminate domination of, exploitation of, and discrimination against any person, group, or class on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, marital status, political belief, religion, immigration status, or mental or physical disability. 38 THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS Adopted on December 10, 1948 by the General Assembly of the United Nations (without dissent) PREAMBLE: Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people, Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law, Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations, Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom, Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in cooperation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms, Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge, as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction. Now, therefore, The General Assembly proclaims This Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article I All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. 39 Article 2 Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. Article 3 Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. Article 4 No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. Article 5 No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Article 6 Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law. Article 7 All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination. Article 8 Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law. Article 9 No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile. 40 Article10 Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him. Article 11 (1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defense. (2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed. Article 12 No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks. Article 13 (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each State. (2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country. Article 14 (1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution. (2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non- political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations. Article 15 (1) Everyone has the right to a nationality. (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality. 41 Article 16 (1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution. (2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses. (3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State. Article 17 (1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others. (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property. Article 18 Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance. Article 19 Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. Article 20 (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association. (2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association. Article 21 (1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives. (2) Everyone has the right to equal access to public service in his country. (3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures. 42 Article 22 Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality. Article 23 (1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment. (2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work. (3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection. (4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests. Article 24 Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay. Article 25 (1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and wellbeing of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control. (2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection. Article 26 (1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit. (2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall 43 promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace. (3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children. Article 27 (1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits. (2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author. Article 28 Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized. Article 29 (1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible. (2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society. (3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations. Article 30 Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein. G.A. res. 217A (III), U.N. Doc A/810 at 71 (1948) 44 EDUCATIONAL POLICY AND ACCREDITATION STANDARDS OF THE COUNCIL ON SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION Approved by the Board of Directors, Council on Social Work Education, June 2008 The Council on Social Work Education (CSWE), the accrediting agency for social work education in the US, mandates that all BSW and MSW programs develop and implement an explicit curriculum that prepares graduates for practice by mastering a set of 10 core competencies and 41 accompanying practice behaviors. These are: 1. Professional Identity: Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly. Social workers serve as representatives of the profession, its mission, and its core values. They know the profession’s history. Social workers commit themselves to the profession’s enhancement and to their own professional conduct and growth. Practice Behaviors: Social workers advocate for client access to the services of social work; practice personal reflection and self-correction to assure continual professional development; attend to professional roles and boundaries; demonstrate professional demeanor in behavior, appearance, and communication; engage in career-long learning; and use supervision and consultation 2. Ethical Practice: Apply social work ethical principles to guide ethical practice. Social workers have an obligation to conduct themselves ethically and to engage in ethical decision-making. Social workers are knowledgeable about the value base of the profession, its ethical standards, and relevant law. Practice Behaviors: Social workers recognize and manage personal values in a way that allows professional values to guide practice; make ethical decisions by applying standards of the National Association of Social Workers Code of Ethics and, as applicable, of the International Federation of Social Workers/International Association of Schools of Social Work Ethics in Social Work, Statement of Principles; tolerate ambiguity in resolving ethical conflicts; and apply strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled decisions. 3. Critical Thinking: Apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments. Social workers are knowledgeable about the principles of logic, scientific inquiry, and reasoned discernment. They use critical thinking augmented by creativity and curiosity. Critical thinking also requires the synthesis and communication of relevant information. Practice Behaviors: Social workers distinguish, appraise, and integrate multiple sources of knowledge, including researchbased knowledge, and practice wisdom; 45 analyze models of assessment, prevention, intervention, and evaluation; and demonstrate effective oral and written communication in working with individuals, families, groups, organizations, communities, and colleagues. 4. Diversity in Practice: Engage diversity and difference in practice. Social workers understand how diversity characterizes and shapes the human experience and is critical to the formation of identity. The dimensions of diversity are understood as the intersectionality of multiple factors including age, class, color, culture, disability, ethnicity, gender, gender identity and expression, immigration status, political ideology, race, religion, sex, and sexual orientation. Social workers appreciate that, as a consequence of difference, a person’s life experiences may include oppression, poverty, marginalization, and alienation as well as privilege, power, and acclaim. Practice Behaviors: Social workers recognize the extent to which a culture’s structures and values may oppress, marginalize, alienate, or create or enhance privilege and power; gain sufficient self-awareness to eliminate the influence of personal biases and values in working with diverse groups; recognize and communicate their understanding of the importance of difference in shaping life experiences; and view themselves as learners and engage those with whom they work as informants. 5. Human rights and Social Justice: Advance human rights and social and economic justice. Each person, regardless of position in society, has basic human rights, such as freedom, safety, privacy, an adequate standard of living, health care, and education. Social workers recognize the global interconnections of oppression and are knowledgeable about theories of justice and strategies to promote human and civil rights. Social work incorporates social justice practices in organizations, institutions, and society to ensure that these basic human rights are distributed equitably and without prejudice. Practice Behaviors: Social workers understand the forms and mechanisms of oppression and discrimination; advocate for human rights and social and economic justice; and engage in practices that advance social and economic justice. 6. Research Based Practice: Engage in research-informed practice & practice-informed research. Social workers use practice experience to inform research, employ evidence-based interventions, evaluate their own practice, and use research findings to improve practice, policy, and social service delivery. Social workers comprehend quantitative and qualitative research and understand scientific and ethical approaches to building knowledge. Practice Behaviors: Social workers use practice experience to inform scientific inquiry and use research evidence to inform practice. 46 7. Human Behavior: Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment. Social workers are knowledgeable about human behavior across the life course; the range of social systems in which people live; and the ways social systems promote or deter people in maintaining or achieving health and well-being. Social workers apply theories and knowledge from the liberal arts to understand biological, social, cultural, psychological, and spiritual development. Practice Behaviors: Social workers utilize conceptual frameworks to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation; and critique and apply knowledge to understand person and environment. 8. Policy Practice: Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and to deliver effective social work services. Social work practitioners understand that policy affects service delivery, and they actively engage in policy practice. Social workers know the history and current structures of social policies and services; the role of policy in service delivery; and the role of practice in policy development. Practice Behaviors: Social workers analyze, formulate, and advocate for policies that advance social well-being; and collaborate with colleagues and clients for effective policy action. 9. Practice Contexts: Respond to contexts that shape practice. Social workers are informed, resourceful, and proactive in responding to evolving organizational, community, and societal contexts at all levels of practice. Social workers recognize that the context of practice is dynamic, and use knowledge and skill to respond proactively. Practice Behaviors: Social workers continuously discover, appraise, and attend to changing locales, populations, scientific and technological developments, and emerging societal trends to provide relevant services; and provide leadership in promoting sustainable changes in service delivery and practice to improve the quality of social services. 10. Engage, Assess, Intervene, Evaluate: Engage, assess, intervene, and evaluate with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. Professional practice involves the dynamic and interactive processes of engagement, assessment, intervention, and evaluation at multiple levels. Social workers have the knowledge and skills to practice with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. Practice knowledge includes identifying, analyzing, and implementing evidence-based interventions designed to achieve client goals; using research and technological advances; evaluating program outcomes and practice effectiveness; developing, analyzing, advocating, and providing leadership for policies and services; and promoting social and economic justice. 47 Educational Policy 2.1.10(a)—Engagement Practice Behaviors: Social workers substantively and affectively prepare for action with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities; use empathy and other interpersonal skills; and develop a mutually agreed-on focus of work and desired outcomes. Educational Policy 2.1.10(b)—Assessment Practice Behaviors: Social workers collect, organize, and interpret client data; assess client strengths and limitations; develop mutually agreed-on intervention goals and objectives; and select appropriate intervention strategies. Educational Policy 2.1.10(c)—Intervention Practice Behaviors: Social workers initiate actions to achieve organizational goals; implement prevention interventions that enhance client capacities; help clients resolve problems; negotiate, mediate, and advocate for clients; and facilitate transitions and endings. Educational Policy 2.1.10(d)—Evaluation Practice Behaviors: Social workers critically analyze, monitor, and evaluate interventions _________________________________________________________________________________________________ The MSW program has additional advanced practice behaviors. These can be found in section VI. The Master of Social Work (MSW) Program. 48 III. INTRODUCTION TO The SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM HISTORY OF THE SOCIAL WORK PROGRAMS Wheelock College has been home to a Bachelor of Social Work (BSW) program since 1980 and graduated its first class in 1984. The BSW program was initially accredited by the Council on Social Work Education (CSWE) in 1985 and has been continuously reaccredited since that time. Wheelock College admitted its first class of graduate social work students in the fall 2000 semester. Building and expanding on the BSW’s very successful approaches and strategies for attracting and graduating a diverse group of highly qualified students, the Wheelock College MSW program was created with a specific focus on human rights and social and economic justice in order to prepare graduates for the social work practice, policy, and leadership challenges of the 21st century. This focus has subsequently been infused further in the BSW program as well. The MSW program was granted candidacy by CSWE on November 20, 2000, obtained initial accreditation in June 2003, and has been continuously accredited since. MISSION OF THE SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM The mission of the Social Work Program at Wheelock College is to: Promote human rights and social and economic justice for the most disadvantaged and oppressed populations through the evolving practice, research, and policy work of students, faculty, staff, and alumni; Prepare a diverse group of students for beginning and advanced, justice-based, professional social work practice with all levels of client systems; Provide leadership in responding to the human service needs of diverse populations of children, families, and communities; and, Advance the field of social work, through practice, research, and scholarship. The mission statement corresponds with the mission of Wheelock College—to improve the lives of children and families. The Programs are committed, in principle and practice, to justice-based social work through preparing strengths-based, multi-culturally competent social work practitioners who work in partnership with client systems and other professionals to provide services, identify and secure resources, and advance human rights and social and economic justice in all dimensions of their professional practice. This is a mission that reflects the needs of diverse communities within local, national, and global contexts. This mission statement is consistent with the purpose, values, and ethics of the profession of social work. It provides a context for the goals, objectives, and all activities of both the BSW and MSW programs. Our mission is represented in our philosophy and overarching conceptual framework, which informs our practice approaches and is integrated throughout the Social Work Programs in content, pedagogy, and outcomes. The mission is evident in the participatory teaching/learning environment of the programs - in the highly engaged classroom environment and advising relationships, in curriculum development, in developing new practicum sites and sustaining relationships in the field, in relationships across the College, with our alumni, and with external constituencies, and in continuous program renewal. 49 JUSTICE-BASED SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE Social work practice that is justice-based reflects two key commitments: one, ongoing development of a justice-based perspective; and two, ongoing development of practice skills that are applied to the goals of working toward human rights and social and economic justice at all levels of society (see Birkenmaier, 2003). Developing a justice-based perspective means understanding and being committed to the concept of distributive justice as an organizing framework for social work (Lum, 2011); that is, the fair and equitable distribution of social and material goods. This perspective entails having a critical, contextual, systemic approach to all aspects of social work practice. It is a perspective that encompasses knowledge of the role of power, ideology, and institutionalization in how oppression, racism, discrimination and disadvantage manifest in society, as well as one’s own location in those dynamics. This perspective also acknowledges how the construction of difference in society (locally and globally) is oriented to deficiency and that this construction underlies how individual, family, and community needs are met or not met through definitions of advantage and disadvantage. Consequently, individual and family issues are seen as inextricably linked with larger community, societal, and global trends and realities; and local human needs are known to be inextricably connected to broader issues of human rights. A justice-based perspective seeks the promotion of human rights and social and economic justice as an explicit and sustained goal. Social work practice based on a justice perspective occurs through applying an integrated model of empowering practice that is based on understanding the contextual, transactional nature of individual and social change. Justice-based practice, in all arenas of social work – direct practice, research, and policy, is multiculturally competent, strengths-oriented, collaborative in all aspects of practice, and committed to social change through advancement of and linkages among multiple dimensions of empowerment (Birkenmaier, 2011; Miley, O’Melia & Dubois, 2011). Birkenmaier, J. (2003). On becoming a social justice practitioner. In J.J. Stretch, E.M. Burkemper, W.J. Hutchison & J. Wilson (Eds.), Practicing social justice, pp. 51-54. New York: The Haworth Press, Inc. Miley, K.K., O’Melia, M. & Dubois, B. (2011). Generalist social work practice: An empowering Approach, (4th ed). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc. Lum, D. (Ed.). (2011). Culturally competent practice: A framework for understanding diverse groups and justice issues, (2nd ed). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. 50 IV. GOALS AND Curricular Themes SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM GOALS The program goals identify how the program is designed to prepare a diverse group of BSW and MSW students with the knowledge, skills, and values for justice-based social work practice. They suggest particular approaches for achieving the mission of the program and provide direction to teaching practices and curriculum development. The assumptions embedded in the program goals also result in a definition and expectation of leadership competencies in graduating justice-based social workers. These competencies are cultivated by providing stepping stones for growth, supporting students' development of a knowledge base and skills, and through evaluating student progress throughout both programs. In the BSW program and the MSW foundation year, emphasis is on the mastery of generalist practice theory, practice models, and skills. In the MSW concentration year, the criteria for developing competencies manifest in advanced knowledge, skills, values, leadership capacity, and the necessary passion and skills for creating a more just world through the diverse venues of social work practice. 1. Prepare students to practice justice-based social work with client systems of all sizes with a concentration on children and families, based on advancing human rights and social and economic justice in both local and global contexts and reflecting the values and ethics of the social work profession; 2. Prepare students with generalist (BSW and MSW foundation year) and advanced (MSW concentration year) knowledge and skills to critically analyze, implement, and evaluate the differential use of social work theories, practice models, social policies, and social work research in practice with children and families; 3. Prepare students for appropriate leadership in the development, implementation, and evaluation of social work practice that is strengths-oriented, multi-culturally competent, familycentered, and community-based, using an eco-systemic and collaborative framework; 4. Prepare students to engage in continuous self-reflection, ongoing professional development, and evaluation of their own professional practice, with the aims of implementing best practices, enhancing personal development, and making the greatest contribution to the profession and the world. SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM CURRICULAR THEMES 1. Human Rights and Social and Economic Justice (Core Competency 5) The mission of the social work profession is to create an increasingly just society by working directly with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities, through practice, policy, and research. Since social structures often serve to perpetuate inequality and social injustice, most negatively affecting oppressed and marginalized populations, it is the mission of social work to effect change at the structural level as well (Lum, 2010; Olson, Reid, Threadgill-Goldson, Riffe, & Ryan, 2013). The commitment in social work to advancing justice guides practitioners to take a stand for the basic human rights for all that such a 51 world requires. A justice-based approach means that social workers seek the provision of a just share in world prosperity for people and communities who are the most oppressed and an increase in access for all to both the social and material resources people need to live healthy and fulfilling lives (Barrett, 2011; Lum, 2010). This stance, and the action that necessarily follows from it, distinguish social work from other helping professions; and it particularly distinguishes the Wheelock program(s). Justice-based social work practice, in all arenas— direct practice, research, and policy, is multiculturally competent, strengthsoriented, collaborative, and committed to social change through intentional advancement of multiple dimensions of empowerment (Birkenmaier, 2003; Miley, O’Melia & Dubois, 2012). 2. Social Work Values and Ethics (Core Competency 2) Social work values and professional ethics direct social workers to “embrace a set of core values which are the foundation of social work’s unique purpose and perspective: service, social justice, dignity and worth of person, importance of human relationships, integrity and competence” (NASW, 2008). Social work values and ethics provide a moral grounding for Wheelock’s social work curricula. Students are prepared to demonstrate a commitment to these values and to actualize the Code of Ethics in all relationships and practices with people and systems. This responsibility includes the ability and willingness to reflect upon and evaluate personal and professional values and practice (NASW, 2008). Reflexive practice requires the ongoing examination—through introspection, ongoing learning, and supervision—of the social worker’s use of self and ability to deliver services nonjudgmentally and with respect for all (Dolgoff & Loewenberg, 2011; Reamer, 2010). 3. Strengths Perspective (Core Competencies 2, 4, & 7) The profession of social work is based on the belief that each human being possesses a unique constellation of strengths and that these assets, talents, aspirations, and skills contribute to active involvement in and mastery of life circumstances. Strengths exist within the individual, the family, the group, and the environment. Each of these dimensions, and the dynamic interplay among them, contains the potential for growth, change, and increasing efficacy. Through a strengths perspective, social workers view client systems as resilient and resourceful. A strengths orientation requires the social worker to respect, validate, and help maximize client strengths within a partnership built on mutuality and collaboration (Saleebey, 2013; Poulin, 2009). It also requires the social worker to challenge the deficitsbased models which relate to client systems as passive, problem-driven, and as victim(s). The strengths perspective supports principles for practice that are based on an empowerment model of viewing people and communities and honors people’s knowledge and narratives of their life experiences. This approach and is deeply consistent with the profession’s regard for people’s worth, respect, human dignity, and justice. 4. Human Diversity (Core Competency 4) To provide justice-based services that are effective, collaborative, and strength-based, social workers must appreciate the positive value of difference, acknowledge the strengths within the unique characteristics of diverse populations, and use multiculturally competent methods of providing services, resources, and supports to individuals, groups, families, organizations, and communities (Lum, 2010; NASW, 2001). To practice multiculturally competent social work, the social worker must continually develop the knowledge, skills, and values necessary to provide services for client systems distinguished by human diversity in all forms in an increasingly global society, including race, ethnicity, culture, socioeconomic 52 class, gender, sexual orientation, spirituality and religion, physical and/or mental disability, age, language(s), national origin, immigration status, and political orientation, as well as other unique intra- and inter-group identities (Van Soest & Garcia, 2008). Social workers must be adept in using skills, techniques, conceptual frameworks, and methodological approaches to empowerment-based engagement, assessment, intervention, evaluation, and termination that reflect the worker’s understanding of the intersectional nature of diversity in lived experience (Fong & Faruto, 2001; Guadalupe & Lum, 2004). Additionally, an integral dimension of multicultural competency is the social worker’s continuous reflection on his/her own personal values, assumptions, and beliefs, and on the interlocking and complex nature of culture and personal identity i n the worker’s own social location, independent of and in relation to client systems (Yan & Wong, 2005). The complexity and personal nature of human diversity and lived experience makes multicultural competence an essential component of justice-based professional social work and the social worker’s ongoing professional development. 5. Ecosystemic Perspective (Core Competencies 7 & 9) The ecosystemic perspective in social work directs practitioners to continuously assess and reflect on the multisystemic factors affecting all areas of human existence, as well as the transactional dynamics among those factors. This perspective is based on a conceptual and theoretical framework for understanding that people exist and develop in contexts of dynamic, reciprocal interactions among many internal and external dimensions (Darling, 2007; Haight & Taylor, 2012). The ecosystemic perspective provides social workers with empirical theories and conceptual frameworks that address the transactional relationships between and among systems that affect people’s quality of life and life chances, utilizing a holistic approach to assessment, intervention, evaluation, and termination, including both personal and structural systems and dynamics (Green & McDermott, 2010). Based on the understanding that people can and do change their environments in order to survive and thrive, and that constraints in the environment may also constrain people’s attainment of well-being, the focus of professional social work practice is to support the improvement of the person/environment and system/environment fit, in order to promote achievement of adaptive coping, resiliency, and empowerment (Miley, O’Melia & DuBois, 2012). 6. Family-Centered Practice (Core Competencies 6, 7, 9, & 10) Social work practice today continues the profession’s vigorous and enduring commitment to families throughout the history of the profession. In using a family-centered approach, the social worker seeks to understand the family’s definition of itself, its issues, its hopes and goals, and to offer services in ways that families define as supportive, helpful, and empowering (Madsen, 2007; Walsh, 2011). Social work services that are family-centered strive to meet the needs of children and families in their natural communities, recognizing the complexity of their lives in ways that are centered on families and their needs (Walsh, 2011). Family-centered practice corresponds with: 1) a perspective that centers families in practice, as they define themselves and their goals; 2) a knowledge base and capability to apply familycentered practice concepts and skills in work with any number of persons (including individuals); and, 3) the evolving knowledge and skills for working directly with families and extended family systems (Epley, Summers, & Turnbull, 2010). 7. Community-Based Practice (Core Competencies 3, 9, & 10) Community-based social work practice directs the social worker to provide services as close to clients’ homes as possible and to consider natural and informal supports as part of a 53 strengths-based approach to intervention (Brown, Venkatesh, Vidal, & Chaskin, 2001; Green & Haines, 2011). As a justice-based and empowerment-oriented approach, community-based practice occurs with and within the neighborhoods and environments in which children and their families live, work, learn, play, worship, etc. (Booth, Ayers, & Marsiglia, 2012). This approach requires an examination of the relationship between the persistence of such conditions as poverty, oppression, discrimination, violence, underresourced schools and crumbling infrastructure and family and community well- being. Solutions for communities must include the revitalization of neighborhoods, schools, recreation centers, and local businesses, so that the children and their families can thrive. Just as families must be at the center of services designed to assist them, so must members of local communities be partners in revitalization strategies for their environment(s) (Walter & Petr, 2011). 8. Partnered Practice (Core Competencies 2, 7, 9, & 10) The social work profession emphasizes the importance of building and maintaining relationships based on mutual participation and respect for client self-determination, with a focus on identifying client strengths and with regard for individual worth and dignity. The concept of partnered practice is grounded in a belief that the inclusion of client systems and any other relevant parties in all areas and all phases of practice – engagement, assessment, intervention, evaluation, and termination – is critical to social work that aims to be empowering and justice-based. The overarching goals of partnered practice (Aronoff & Bailey, 2005) are to effectively address the complex and interconnected nature of personal and social justice issues and to advocate for change through extended and integrated networks of collaboration. Integrating a strengths perspective, social workers must work with all client systems, as the experts on their own lived experience and as collaborators in the achievement of any real change (Poulin, 2009). The complexity of issues facing children and families today, especially those most challenged by issues such as poverty, racism, discrimination, violence, and other forms of oppression, requires all those invested in change to work together as effective partners. With this in mind, relevant partners must first include the people whose lives are most affected by the issues at hand. It will also likely engage persons from a variety of disciplines, professions, and systems who may have insight into, or impact on, whether change occurs. The social work profession is rooted in values of collaboration across systems. Partnered practice relies on all involved and affected to bring their diverse strengths, perspectives, relationships, and expertise to the process of change and to be embraced as essential and equal partners (Aronoff & Bailey, 2005). At the same time, it is the responsibility of the professional social worker using this approach to be aware of his/her own frames of reference, along with his/her strengths and liabilities in order to achieve an effective use of self in those partnered relationships (McKee, 2003). Partnered practice gives very rich meaning to the social work concepts of “client- centered” and “client-driven” practice, as it is rooted in a deep respect for and inclusion of each person, family, or group’s expert knowledge of their lived experience, needs, and goals, and then utilizes that knowledge, talents, and inherent hopes to create change. 9. Interprofessional Collaboration (Core Competencies 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10) The ability to work from an interprofessional and collaborative perspective is a necessity and an obligation of professional social work practice and leadership (Corrigan & Bishop, 1997; Poulin, 2009). Because of the complexity of issues facing children and families today, especially families who are challenged by such issues as poverty, unsafe neighborhoods, 54 immigration, violence, and oppression, there is a need to work collaboratively among disciplines and systems to achieve positive change (Bronstein, 2003; Miller, 2012; Perrault, McClelland, Austin, & Sieppert, 2011). Social workers utilize the profession’s inherent integration of diverse knowledge bases to collaborate with a variety of professional disciplines as the basis of good practice. The primary goal in social work of advancing human rights and social and economic justice not only benefits from, but also requires, interprofessional collaboration (Aronoff & Bailey, 2003), based on the knowledge, skills, and values needed to create, implement, and evaluate justice-based, integrated, and well-coordinated systems of services for children and families whose well-being is most at risk, due to a variety of interrelated personal, social, political, and economic factors (Tataw, 2011). 10. Responsibility for Career Long Professional Growth (Core Competency 1) The building and deepening of social work knowledge, values, skills, and one’s selfawareness are career-long processes that are achieved through focused attention and continual effort (NASW, 1996). Social work education begins during the attainment of the degree and continues throughout the professional development of each worker. By instilling an appreciation for ongoing professional growth and maturation in the context of future employment, formal and informal educational opportunities, and the development of relationships with clients, supervisors, and colleagues, Wheelock’s social work programs strive to develop and reinforce students’ enthusiasm to be career-long learners as well as active contributors to the learning experience of others. 11. Self-care (Core Competency 1) Social workers assist clients who face a wide range of stressful life experiences that have complex causes, outcomes, and effects. In the process of helping clients solve problems and master their circumstances, social workers open themselves to the impact that these stressors can have on their own functioning. In performing this work most effectively in the context of living their own lives, social workers must learn to manage stress, prevent burnout, and promote their own health and wellness. In order to carry out the ongoing process of maintaining personal and professional equilibrium, social workers are committed to continual reflection and the practice of self-care (Cox & Steiner, 2013; Lee & Miller, 2013). ****************************************************************************** 55 References Aronoff, N. L. & Bailey, D. (2005). Partnered practice: Building on our small group tradition. Social Work with Groups, 28(1), 23-39. Barrett, J.A. (2011). Multicultural social justice and human rights: Strategic professional development for social work and counseling practitioners. Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology, 3(1), 117-123. Birkenmaier, J. (2003). On becoming a social justice practitioner. In J.J. Stretch, E.M. Burkemper, W.J. Hutchison & J. Wilson (Eds.), Practicing social justice, pp. 5154. New York: The Haworth Press, Inc. Booth, J., Ayers, S.L., & Marsiglia, F.F. (2012). Perceived neighborhood safety and psychological distress: Exploring protective factors. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 39(4), 137-156. Bronstein, L.R. (2003). A model for interdisciplinary collaboration. Social Work, 48(3), 297306. Brown, P., Venkatesh, S., Vidal, A., & Chaskin, R.J. (2001). Building community capacity. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction. Corrigan, D., & Bishop, K.K. (1997). Creating family-centered integrated service systems and interprofessional educational programs to implement them. Social Work in Education, 19(3), 149-63. Cox, K., & Steiner, S. (2013). Self-care in social work: A guide for practitioners, supervisors, and administrators. Washington, D.C.: NASW Press. Darling, N. (2007). Ecological systems theory: The person in the center of the circles. Research in Human Development, 4(3–4), 203–217. Dolgoff, R., Loewenberg, F. M., & Harrington, D. (2011). Ethical decisions for social work practice. Brooks/Cole. Epley, P., Summers, J.A., & Turnbull, A. (2010). Characteristics and trends in family- centered conceptualizations. Journal of Family Social Work, 13, 269–285. Fong, R., & Furuto, S. (2001). Culturally competent practice: Skills, interventions, and evaluation. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Green, D. & McDermott, F. (2010). Social work from inside and between complex systems: Perspectives on person-in-environment for today’s social work. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 2414–2430. Green, G.P. & Haines, A.L. (2011). Asset building and community development, (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 56 Guadalupe, K.L., & Lum, D. (2004). Multidimensional Contextual Practice: Diversity and Transcendence. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. Haight, W.L., & Taylor, E.H. (2012). Human behavior for social work practice: A developmental-ecological framework, (2nd ed.). Chicago: Lyceum Books, Inc. Lee, J.J., & Miller, S.E. (2013). A self-care framework for social workers: Building a strong foundation for practice. Families in Society, 94(2), 96-103. Lum, D. (Ed.). (2010). Culturally competent practice: A framework for understanding diverse groups and justice issues, (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. Lynch, E.W., & Hanson, J. (2004). Developing cross-cultural competence: A guide for working with children and their families, (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. Madsen,W. C. (2007). Collaborative therapy with multi-stressed families, (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press. McKee, M. (2003). Excavating our frames of mind: The key to dialogue and collaboration. Social Work, 48(3), 401-408. Miley, K.K., O’Melia, M. & Dubois, B. (2012). Generalist social work practice: An empowering approach, (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc. Miller, G. (2012). Application of theory to family-centered care: A role for social workers. Social Work in Health Care, 51(2), 89-106. NASW 2008 Delegate Assembly. (2008). NASW Code of Ethics. Washington, DC: NASW Press. NASW National Committee on Racial and Ethnic Diversity. (2001). NASW Standards for Cultural Competence in Social Work Practice. Washington, DC: NASW Press. Olson, C. J., Reid, C., Threadgill-Goldson, N., Riffe, H. A., & Ryan, P.A. (2013). Voices from the field: Social workers define and apply social justice. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 24(1), 23-42. Perrault, E., McClelland, R., Austin, C., & Sieppert, J. (2011). Working together in collaborations: Successful process factors for community collaboration. Administration in Social Work, 35, 282–298. Poulin, J. and Contributors (2009). Collaborative social work: Strengths-based generalist practice, 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole. Reamer, F. G. (2010). Ethics and values in social work: Oxford bibliographies online research guide. New York: Oxford University Press. Saleebey, D. (2013). The strengths perspective in social work, 6th ed. Boston: Pearson. 57 Tataw, D.B. (2011). Individual, organizational, and community interprofessional competencies for education, training, and practice in health and social care. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 21, 1–24. Van Soest, D., & Garcia, B. (2008). Diversity education for social justice: Mastering teaching skills, 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA: NASW Press. Walsh, F. (2011). Normal family processes: Growing diversity and complexity. New York: The Guilford Press. Walter, U.M., & Petr, C.G. (2011). Best practices in wraparound: A multidimensional view of the evidence. SocialWork, 56(1), 73-80. Yan, M.C., & Wong, R.Y. (2005). Rethinking self-awareness in cultural competence: Towards a dialogic self in cross-cultural social work. Families in Society, 86(2), 181-188. 58 Program Framework: Curricular Themes & Competencies Competencies Curricular Themes Human Rights & Social & Economic Justice Social Work Values and Ethics Strengths Perspective Program Vision Human Rights and Social & Economic Justice for Diverse Groups of Children & Families who are the most Discriminated against, Disadvantaged, and Oppressed Human Diversity Ecosystemic Perspective Family-Centered Practice Community-Based Practice Partnered Practice Interprofessional Collaboration Responsibility for Career Long Professional Growth Self-Care MSW Concentration: Children and Families Identify as a Professional Social Worker Apply Social Work Ethical Practices Apply Critical Thinking Engage Diversity Advance Human Rights & Justice Engage in Research-Informed Practice Apply Knowledge of Human Behavior & the Social Environment Engage in Policy Practice Respond to Practice Contexts Engage, Assess, Intervene & Evaluate with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations and Communities Justice-Based Social Work Practice 58a Wheelock College Social Work Programs PROGRAM COMMITMENT TO SELF CARE As stated in the Curricular Themes for both the BSW and MSW Programs, self-care is an important practice for social workers to incorporate into their repertoire of skills. As a department, we strongly believe in nurturing and reinforcing the development of this practice in our students and faculty alike. To this end, self-care activities, initiated by faculty and students alike, are frequently incorporated into our class assignments and meeting agendas. RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITES OF THE SOCIAL WORK STUDENT Rights Social Work students have the right: to be treated with courtesy, respect, and fairness by College faculty and administrators and not to be discriminated against on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, gender, religion, political orientation, sexual orientation, physical or mental disabilities, marital status, or socioeconomic status; to receive prompt feedback on assignments, to be alerted, in a timely manner with a COMPASS Report, about serious problems in performance in courses and in the practicum, and to be informed of what is needed to correct or change or improve, the timeline, and the consequences; to be informed of the results of the Social Work Student Support Team review process within two weeks of the completion of the review; to request a change in practicum placement when difficulties cannot be resolved by a collaborative process involving the student, the agency Field Instructor, the Faculty Field Liaison, the Director of Social Work Field Education, and the Faculty Advisor, and when the difficulties do not arise from student’s documented inability to meet the demands of the practicum; to appeal an academic grade and/or academic dismissal by following the appeals process detailed in the Wheelock College Catalog; to apply for reinstatement in a practicum after voluntarily withdrawing for documented health reasons or after failing the practicum by following the process of reinstatement detailed in the Social Work Department Student Handbook and Field Practicum Manual; to request a change in advisor and be provided with a new advisor who is a social work faculty member; to decide not to participate in any research study conducted by the program and/or a particular faculty member; to refuse to have their written assignments copied and distributed without their consent; 59 to receive basic information about licensing, NASW membership, and other important professional matters that impact on the students’ careers, or to be referred to groups that can provide such information; to participate in the hiring of full time, tenured track, social work faculty by meeting the candidates, hearing presentations by candidates, and giving feedback to the Search Committee; to participate in curriculum development and revision by providing feedback directly to faculty, the Program Chairs, or the Associate Dean or through serving on the Social Work Advisory Board; to request a meeting, without the permission of the Program Chairs or Associate Dean, with the Council on Social Work Education accreditation site team, either individually or as a group; to be informed of changes in the social work curriculum with sufficient advanced notice to meet new requirements; and to form organizations and/or interest groups with the other social work students and to plan activities without any interference from the Department faculty. Responsibilities Social Work students are expected to: treat faculty, classmates, administrators, field instructors, College and agency staff, and clients with courtesy, respect, and fairness, and not discriminate on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, gender, religion, political orientation, sexual orientation, physical or mental disabilities, marital status, or socioeconomic status; meet with their faculty advisors at least two times per year, including during the scheduled pre-registration advising period, and to use their advisors as resource persons at other times as necessary; prepare for meetings with their faulty advisors by studying the course offerings, developing a tentative schedule, and consulting with advisor as desired regarding field practicum choices, career issues, licensing and other issues; become familiar with academic requirements and policies by studying the Wheelock College Catalog and the Wheelock College Social Work Student Handbook and Field Manual. The student is ultimately responsible for knowing graduation requirements, prerequisites for individual courses, and the content and assignments stated in each course syllabus; become familiar with student rights and grievance procedures, which are detailed in the Wheelock College Catalog; participate in the practicum placement process by attending meetings with the Social Work Field Education Staff, completing necessary forms, 60 interviewing at the prospective practicum sites, and giving feedback on the outcomes of the interviews to their assigned member of the Field Education staff; become familiar with each faculty member’s expectations of students in courses, including policies related to attendance and punctuality, submission of work, etc; inform faculty advisors of changes in address and telephone number, intentions to transfer or withdraw from the College, or plans to change majors (BSW); complete all course evaluations; complete evaluations of academic advisor, practicum site, field instructor, field liaison; entrance (BSW) and exit questionnaires; and MSW exit interviews; allow a minimum of two weeks when requesting letters of reference from social work faculty; become familiar with the NASW Code of Ethics and act accordingly (contained in this handbook); become familiar with the Council on Social Work Education’s explicit curriculum based on core competencies and practice behaviors (contained in this handbook); become familiar with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and practice accordingly (contained in this handbook). ADVISING IN THE SOCIAL WORK PROGRAMS Philosophy of Advising All advisement at Wheelock College follows a student-centered developmental model, which involves the development of an ongoing relationship between the student and advisor over time. The main thrust of the relationship is to empower students to become active participants in their educational and professional lives. In addition to helping students select courses, complete requirements, and monitor credits, the advising relationship supports students in their personal and professional growth and development. The aim is to help students ask for and receive support when needed, take responsibility for their choices, progress towards goals and completion of degree requirements, and learn how to balance the demands of academic courses, professional training, and their personal lives. Students meet with their advisors at least once/semester and are encouraged to meet with them at additional times of their choosing. 61 Roles and Responsibilities of the Social Work Faculty Advisor: The faculty advisor is a source of information and support to the student throughout the course of study. The following are some of the advisors responsibilities: explain the program’s curriculum, clearly explain the student’s academic plan from the start of the program to graduation, and guide students in the selection of elective courses to meet the degree requirements and the student’s learning goals; periodically evaluate the student’s performance and progress in the program; contact the student when an academic warning or a COMPASS Report has been issued and jointly determine what additional services may be needed by the student; refer the student to supportive services, such as counseling (through the College’s Counseling Center) writing assistance and the like; discuss with the student various fields of social work so that the student can make informed choices about field study, practicum assignments and future work plans upon graduation; encourage the student to participate actively in College and Department activities, social work month celebrations, and the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) so that he or she may develop a professional identity; inform and review with the student all program and College policies that affect him or her, pointing out student’s right and responsibilities; work closely with the student and other faculty to facilitate the best learning environment, should concerns arise about the student’s academic or non-academic behavior; discuss academic and/or career options with a student who is being asked to leave the Social Work Programs or who has decided voluntarily to withdraw from the program of the College; and Fill out and sign forms called for by the College’s or Department’s academic policies. Advisor Access to Student Information: The faculty advisor has access to the student’s Degree Requirement Worksheets, Degree Audit Forms, academic warnings issued by faculty, and the Faculty Field Liaison’s evaluation of the student’s performance in practicum. The student may choose to share his/her admission material with the advisor. Evaluation of Advising: Through completion of the Implicit Curriculum Survey, social work students have an opportunity to inform the program of the extent to which they have used advisors as a resource as well as the strengths and limitations of the advising process. Student input is highly valued and reviewed every year in order to make any necessary changes and improve the advising process. 62 SOCIAL WORK STUDENT SUPPORT TEAM MEETINGS This meeting of all half-time and full-time social work faculty takes place around mid-term each fall and spring semester for both of the BSW and MSW Programs. Part-time social work faculty are invited to attend or to submit information to be shared at that meeting about individual students for whom they have concern. On a rotating basis, one social work faculty member convenes the meeting, and all half and full-time faculty teaching in each program bring to the meeting a list of students for which there are concerns. All students identified are reviewed by all in attendance in the following areas: Strengths Academic performance Progress in class and /or in field Writing ability Professional behavior (field, classroom and other college interactions) During this meeting, a plan is made to address identified concerns regarding each of the students discussed in the review. In most cases, the student’s faculty advisor will work with the student and other faculty members as necessary to address concerns, and provide appropriate supports in a timely manner. For students presenting a more significant concern or challenge, the student’s advisor will work with the student and program Chair and Associate Dean of Social Work and involve others (other faculty including the Director of Social Work Field Education or members of the Office of Academic Advising or Disability Support Services) if necessary, to create and implement a plan for addressing those concerns/challenges in a timely manner. SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM INDIVDUAL STUDENT REVIEW This meeting will take place when there is a concern about an individual student that warrants a separate review by the Social Work Program because of serious problems, such as failing grades in one or more courses or violations of ethical standards in class or in the field. The Social Work review will take place in coordination with any review of the student being made by the Scholastic Review Board (SRB) for undergraduate students and the Graduate Review Board (GRB) for graduate students and will follow all policies of and decisions made by these two College committees. The request for an Individual Student Review can be made to the Social Work Leadership Team (the Associate Dean of Social Work, the MSW and BSW Chairs, and the Director of Social Work Field Education) by an instructor, an advisor, or a field liaison. This review can be a follow-up to the midsemester program review of all students or can be initiated separately at any point in the semester. The Review Team will include the Social Work Leadership Team, the faculty member requesting the review, the student’s advisor, and when appropriate, a member of the Office of Academic Advising. The Review process will be as follows: 1) Before requesting the review, the faculty member will contact the student to discuss the specific concern, providing the student with an opportunity to hear the instructor’s concern and to respond. At that time, the faculty member will discuss that he/she will be requesting a Team review in order to help determine the best plan of action and will explain the review process. 2) The faculty member will put her/his request for the Team review in writing with a copy going to the student. The student may submit a written statement to the Team separately or through her/his advisor. 63 3) The Team will meet as quickly as possible to determine the outcome and to decide who will meet with the student to discuss its implementation. 4) Following the Review, a feedback session will be held with the student as soon as possible. At that time, the student will be given a written statement that indicates the outcome, steps of implementation, and role of each individual who will be involved. This written statement will be filed in the student’s Social Work advising record. 5) The student will also be informed of the College appeal policy that can be initiated if a student disagrees about a final grade or a decision involving suspension or dismissal from the College (Wheelock College Student Handbook, Academic Policies). POLICY ON COMMUNICATION OF INFORMATION The Social Work Program is committed to helping students be as successful as possible. In addressing student needs, it employs a holistic, team-centered approach and tries to help students identify and access appropriate supports. With these goals in mind, information pertaining to a student's performance in any aspect of her/his program, including coursework or practica, may be discussed by social work faculty members when appropriate. In addition, information that is communicated by a student to a faculty member, academic advisor, field education staff member, and/or practicum supervisor may be shared with the Social Work Leadership Team, other relevant faculty members, or members of the College Student Success Team if it is felt that this information affects the well-being of the student or the student's ability to carry out her/his responsibilities as a BSW or MSW student. 64 V. THE BACHELOR OF SOCIAL WORK (BSW) PROGRAM DEGREE REQUIREMENTS AND COURSE DESCRIPTIONS A detailed outline of degree requirements of the Bachelor of Social Work (BSW) Program and description of courses may be found in the Wheelock College Course Catalog. All of the BSW degree requirements and course offerings have been developed to provide students with the foundation of knowledge, values, and skills that comprise generalist practice. This area of social work is best defined by the Council on Social Work Education: “Generalist practice is grounded in the liberal arts and the person and environment construct. To promote human and social well-being, generalist practitioners use a range of prevention and intervention methods in their practice with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. The generalist practitioner identifies with the social work profession and applies ethical principles and critical thinking in practice. Generalist practitioners incorporate diversity in their practice and advocate for human rights and social and economic justice. They recognize, support, and build on the strengths and resiliency of all human beings. They engage in researchinformed practice and are proactive in responding to the impact context on professional practice” (EPAS, 2008, Educational Policy B2.2). The courses that BSW students take to develop mastery of generalist practice are sequenced in an orderly fashion that leads up to and accompanies the senior field experience. The foundation course is SWK 205: Intro to Social Work, taken most often in the second semester of the first year or the first semester of the sophomore year. This course provides students with a basic knowledge of the social work profession, its scope in terms of populations and settings, its theoretical and historical framework, its focus on human rights and social justice, and the core features which distinguish it from other helping professions. At the same time, through the General Education curriculum, students complete the two-semester course in Human Growth and Development, which examines lifespan development from an ecological perspective. They also focus on taking General Education requirements and specific support courses in the Arts and Sciences that are required for the Social Work major, including Introduction to American Government, Human Biology, Statistics, and one course selected in Sociology. In addition to these support courses and those that are part of the General Education curriculum, BSW majors are required to take additional Arts and Sciences offerings of their choosing to further ground their overall education in the liberal arts. These courses can be taken in any year. At the intermediate level, following SWK 205, are SWK 226: Dynamics of Oppression and Privilege and SWK 268: Foundations of Social Research. The first, typically taken in the sophomore year, deepens students’ understanding of oppression, discrimination, and privilege, and the need to promote human rights and social justice in all aspects of social work activity. The second, taken in the sophomore or junior year, introduces students to the research methods used in order to understand and develop knowledge that emanates from evidence-based practice. Rounding out the intermediate level courses at the junior level are SWK 345: Human Behavior and the Social Environment and SWK 355: Social Welfare Policy. SWK 345 builds on the lifespan development perspective of Human Growth and Development and examines the reciprocal interaction of people and the environment in greater depth, and SWK 355 looks at social welfare policy and practice from a historical and contemporary perspective. 65 Also taken in the junior year, prior to the senior practicum is SWK 440: Social Work Practice and Skills Lab I, the first of three practice courses which cover the stages of generalist practice as they apply to work with clients at all systems levels, including individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. SWK 440 provides students with an overview of the helping process and focuses on the initial stage of engagement. SWK 450: Social Work Practice and Skills Lab II and SWK 455: Social Work Practice and Skills Lab III occur in the senior year, alongside the senior practicum. In the first semester, SWK 450 covers assessment and contracting, and intervention at all systems levels; and in the second semester, SWK 455 continues with intervention and proceeds to evaluation, termination, and follow-up. These two practice courses are accompanied each semester by student participation in a field practicum and a bi-weekly field seminar, which integrates theoretical content with the applied knowledge learned in the field. The seminar is conducted by a faculty member who serves as a field liaison to the agency. Set in the senior year, this combination of courses: SWK 450 and SWK 455: Practice and Skills Labs II and III, and SWK 460 and SWK 465: SWK Field Practicum and Seminar I & II comprise the advanced level of the BSW curriculum. The yearlong practicum and seminar is at the center of this grouping. In the spring semester of the junior year, students work with the Social Work Field Education Office to select a placement that fits with their interests and will enhance their development. The placement is in one agency for 200 hours per semester, totaling 400 hours for the year (placements that follow the school-year calendar may require additional time in the field). Students are supervised by a MSW social worker (Field Instructor), who is licensed at the LCSW or LICSW level so that they can take the LSW licensing exam in MA if they wish to do so after graduation. The centrality of the field component of the BSW Program follows the Educational Policy of the Council on Social Work Education which considers Field Education to be the Signature Pedagogy. “Signature pedagogy represents the central form of instruction and learning in which a profession socializes its students to perform the role of practitioner. Professionals have pedagogical norms with which they connect and integrate theory and practice. In social work, the signature pedagogy is field education. The intent of field education is to connect the theoretical and conceptual contribution of the classroom with the practical world of the practice setting. It is a basic precept of social work education that the two interrelated components of curriculum – classroom and field – are of equal importance within the curriculum, and each contributes to the development of the requisite competencies of professional practice. Field education is systemically designed, supervised, coordinated, and evaluated based on criteria by which students demonstrate the achievement of program competencies (EPAS, 2008, Educational Policy 2.3). Throughout their courses and their senior practicum, students study and apply different aspects of the 10 core competencies and 41 practice behaviors formulated by CSWE. Evaluation of their performance in all areas of the curriculum is competency based according to CSWE expectations. Completion of the BSW major enables students to function as entry level professionals in all areas of social work practice and also enables them to apply for advanced standing status to Graduate level MSW programs which offer that option. 66 ADMISSION TO THE BSW PROGRAM The process for admission to the BSW Program begins when a student is admitted to Wheelock as an undergraduate student. In a statement congruent with social work values, the college catalog states that “admission to Wheelock College is based on the whole person, not just the numbers submitted with a student’s application. Wheelock seeks interesting people from diverse backgrounds who see themselves as agents of change. In the admissions process the College looks for scholastic achievement, strong academic evaluations, and dedicated involvement in cocurricular and community activities” (Wheelock College Undergraduate and Graduate Course Catalog, 2013-14, p.35). Specific requirements for admission include four years of high-school English, three of math, and two to three years of both social studies and science. Study in foreign language and the arts is also recommended but not required. Transfer applicants are welcomed at Wheelock and are valued for their experience and maturity. Students are admitted to the first year, sophomore, and junior classes based on previous academic work at a variety of two- and four-year private and public colleges. Transfer students need to have a minimum GPA of 2.0 in order to be considered for admission. A strong background in the liberal arts or general education courses is considered the best foundation for students applying to transfer. Courses from other accredited institutions in which the student has earned a grade of “C” or better are considered for transfer credit. Courses are reviewed on an individual basis and students may be asked to supply catalogue course descriptions or course syllabi to facilitate evaluation of transfer credit. The acceptance of a student’s credits from prior institutions is also affected by the choice of an academic program. In the social work major, courses taken successfully by students who are transferring from another BSW program accredited by CSWE are accepted in place of comparable courses at Wheelock. The equivalence of courses taken at other institutions without Social Work Programs or CSWE accreditation is evaluated on an individual basis by the Chair of the BSW program, in consultation with specific faculty and the Associate Dean of Social Work when needed. In compliance with the standards set by CSWE, the BSW program does not grant credit for life or work experience. All undergraduate transfer students must complete a minimum of half the credits required to earn a degree while at Wheelock. Similarly, a minimum of half the credits needed in any major must be taken subsequent to transfer. In addition to this credit requirement, all students in the BSW program must take their yearlong senior practicum and the accompanying practice courses and seminars at Wheelock. Beyond the College’s admissions requirements for first-year and transfer students and the attainment of a cumulative GPA of 2.0, the BSW Program does not require that students meet specific criteria or complete a separate application in order to be accepted into the major. This practice is in keeping with the Social Work Faculty’s belief in the strengths perspective, the universal drive towards self-actualization, and the innate human capacity for development, maturation, and change. Any student who has completed SWK 205: Intro to Social Work and is interested in becoming a BSW major is welcome to join the program. BSW ADVISING Undergraduate Social Work Advisement is guided by two sets of policies: those of Wheelock College and those of the Council on Social Work Education (CSWE). According to the Advisement 67 Program at Wheelock, all undergraduate students are advised by professional advisors from the Office of Academic Advising and Assistance (OAAA) during the first two years. According to guidelines of the CSWE, all social work majors must be advised by Social Work Faculty. In order to comply with both of these regulations and to create a process that optimizes advising support for students, a specific process has been created. In order to declare social work as their major, students must complete SWK 205: Intro to Social Work. They typically do this either in the second semester of their first year or in their second year. For the first semester of their sophomore year, students continue to be advised by their original OAAA professional advisors. By the end of the fall semester, students declare their major by completing a Declaration of Program form with their initial advisors. When that occurs, the BSW Chair is informed and meets with each new major individually for a Welcome to the Major Interview in order to welcome her/him into the program, assess and refine academic plans, review program expectations of students in academic courses and fieldwork, and begin to talk about career paths and goals. As part of this process, the student fills out a questionnaire to be discussed with the Chair about factors that influenced her/his interest in social work, previous volunteer or work experience, and expectations of the advising relationship. The student also reviews and signs a form explaining the College’s policy on academic honesty. Upon completion of the interview, each student receives a copy of the Social Work Student Handbook & Field Practicum Manual for BSW and MSW Programs and a separate copy of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the two documents which most effectively articulate the mission and policies of the Wheelock Social Work Programs. At this Welcome Interview, all newly declared majors are assigned individually to specific BSW half- or full-time faculty members, who then advise them for the remainder of their undergraduate program. Transfer students typically declare their major at the time of matriculation or within the following semester. They meet with the BSW Chair either during transfer orientation or right at the start of their program. Sophomore transfers will first be advised by OAAA professional advisors and then will follow the same procedure as all other Social Work students. Junior transfers are assigned to a Social Work Faculty Advisor during their first term. In the BSW program, students are required to meet with advisors in order to be cleared to register for each semester. In order to follow student progress, advisors maintain a record on each student which contains a student contact form, a log of student/advisor contacts, the questionnaire and forms filled at the time of the Welcome Interview, the student’s academic map or program plan, degree audit forms, practicum documents, and other forms relevant to each student’s progress. These records are kept in a central location monitored by the Social Work Faculty Assistant and are in file cabinets that can be locked to assure student privacy. 68 BSW PROGRAM ENTRANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Date: Student Name (Print): Phone Number: Transfer Student: Yes No (Circle one) Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior Please answer the following questions thoughtfully and in full sentences: 1. Describe two significant events or persons that have influenced your decision to choose social work as your major. 2. If you had any prior volunteer or paid experience working with children, adolescents, adults or families, please describe. Include your two placements for Human Growth and Development (HGD) at Wheelock or elsewhere. Note what parts of the job you found most rewarding. 3. What is your perception of what social workers do? 4. What characteristics/strengths do you have that relate to your choice of social work as a profession? 5. What questions do you have about the BSW major at Wheelock or about the profession of Social Work? 6. The advising process is a very important one at Wheelock. The following questions are meant to give us an understanding of how advising can be helpful to you: 7. 69 a) How would you describe your learning style? b) What are your strengths and challenges as a learner? c) In what ways can your advisor be most helpful to you in meeting the challenges you may experience in completing the BSW Program? THE BSW FIELD PRACTICUM: BASIC FACTS Program Emphasis and Orientation The curriculum emphasizes the strengths perspective, the primacy of systems theory, the generalist practice method, and the importance of human rights and social justice. The faculty believes that there are common components of all social work practice. These include knowledge, values, and skills which are applicable to a wide range of client systems, problems, and settings. Preparation for generalist practice involves the learning of a problem-solving process that enables the practitioner to intervene on the individual, family, group, organization, and/or community level. The problem-solving process progresses from engagement to data collection, assessment, planning, contracting, intervention, evaluation, and termination. The ecological perspective of systems theory emphasizes the environmental contexts in which people function. The lens of human rights and social justice is used in all work with clients. Purpose of the Practicum To give students the opportunity to apply theory to practice and to develop a core group of skills for generalist practice with diverse people and communities. To begin to apply social work ethical principles and to initiate the process of identification as a professional social worker. Duration This is a 2-semester practicum: Fall/Spring (beginning of September to end of April). Generally, there is no practicum during the College’s one-month winter break and one-week spring break, although this is dependent on the requirements of the practicum agency and should be discussed with the practicum site in advance of each impending break. The Council on Social Work Education mandates a minimum of 400 hours for the full academic year. In this program, students complete 200 hours each semester. Days and Hours During the Fall/Spring semesters, students attend two full days, typically Monday and Wednesday, completing a minimum of 16 hours per week. With the consent of the Field Instructor, students may make other arrangements with the agency provided that practicum hours do not conflict with classes. Supervision To meet accreditation standards set by the Council on Social Work Education, the student in the social work practicum must be supervised by someone with a social work degree. To meet Massachusetts licensing requirements, supervision must be provided by an individual who holds an MSW (post MSW two years) and is licensed at the LCSW or LICSW level. A minimum of one hour per week of face-to-face supervisory conference is required. The Students The practicum is taken by Social Work majors in their senior year. Prior to entry into the practicum, students (with the exception of some transfer students) have had a variety of field experiences in the community and have completed relevant courses: Introduction to Social Work, Human Growth and Development (includes two 30 hour, semester long placements), Social Welfare Policy and Services, Dynamics of Oppression & Privilege, and the first course in the Social Work Practice Methods sequence. Students must also have completed the Wheelock Literacy and Communication exam (WLCE). In preparation for his/her meeting with the Social Work Field Education department, the student must have completed: a Field Information Sheet (found in the appendix), a current resume and the acknowledgement of understanding of practicum policies forms, which follow: 70 BSW PROGRAM ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF UNDERSTANDING OF PRACTICUM POLICIES To be completed by each student and advisor in the fall of the student’s junior year. This is to acknowledge that I have read the following section in the Social Work Student Handbook and Field Practicum Manual and have discussed these policies with my advisor. Practicum placement process Continuation in practicum Policy regarding incomplete grades Minimum grade policy Reinstatement in practicum I understand the following: 1. Before entrance into a practicum is permitted, I will review my total record with my advisor. If I am a transfer student, I may not enter a practicum until I have successfully completed one 16-credit semester and have earned at least 66 academic credits. As a student in practicum, I may not register for more than 16 credits during a practicum semester unless I submit the “Request for Credit Overload During a Practicum” form to my academic advisor for discussion and approval and then to the Associate Dean of Social Work. 2. If I do not meet all of the requirements for entering practicum (completion of at least 66 credits and all sections of the Wheelock Literacy and Communication Exam [WLCE], attainment of a GPA of 2.0, and a minimum grade of “C” in HDP 120/121 and HDP 122/123: Human Growth and Development I and II, SWK 205: Introduction to SWK, SWK 227: Dynamics of Oppression/Discrimination, SWK 355: Social Welfare Policy and Services, and SWK 440: SWK Practice and Skills Lab I), I will not be permitted to begin practicum even though I may have participated in the placement process. 3. If I get a grade lower than “C” in SWK 450: Social Work Practice and Skills Lab II in first semester of senior year, I will need to wait until the following fall to retake this course and will not be able to continue with the practice/practicum sequence in the second semester. 4. If I obtain a grade lower than “C” in either SWK 345: Human Behavior and the Social Environment or SWK 268: Social Research or HDP 264: Research Methods if taken during the first semester of my practicum, I may remain in my practicum but must repeat the course(s) and obtain at least a “C” to graduate. (Repeating either of these courses requires completion of the “Request for Continuance” form; and taking the second semester of practicum without having completed these prerequisites requires completion of the “Special Permission” form.) My graduation date may have to be delayed to complete this requirement. 5. If I get a failing grade in practicum, I must seek permission of the Scholastic Review Board (SRB) to repeat practicum by following the College’s procedures 71 for reinstatement. 6. If I determine the need to withdraw from practicum, I will receive a failing grade unless I petition and receive approval from the SRB for consideration of extenuating circumstances. 7. If I receive a grade of Incomplete in either SWK 450: SWK Practice and Skills Lab II or SWK 460: SWK Field Practicum & Seminar I in the first semester of senior year, I will need to complete all work successfully and submit it to the instructor so that the Incomplete is changed to a satisfactory grade prior to re-entering practicum. Student Signature Print Student Name 72 Advisor Signature Date BSW PROGRAM FIELD PRACTICUM PLANNING AND PLACEMENT CONTRACT This contract is to acknowledge that I have read the field practicum placement process outlined here and in the Social Work Student Handbook and Field Practicum Manual. Based on the criteria stated in the manual, and repeated on the previous page of this document, I am eligible to begin the planning and placement process for my senior year field practicum in the BSW Program. I agree to: 1. Meet with my academic advisor no later than midterm of the fall semester of my junior year (can be during the course registration meeting) to review the placement process, to discuss any concerns or questions I may have regarding the practicum policies and the practicum planning and placement process, and to acknowledge my understanding of, and agreement with, the process and policies by signing both pages of this form. 2. Attend all group and individual meetings scheduled to discuss the senior field practicum placement process and experience. 3. Submit the Field Information Sheet and updated resume required for the placement process prior to meeting with the Social Work Field Education Office. 4. Adhere to the time frame agreed upon in meeting with my assigned Social Work Field Education staff and keep her/him informed as to the progress of my placement interviews. 5. Check my Wheelock email and voicemail daily and inform the Field Education staff of any change in my contact information. 6. Contact the Field Education staff and my Academic Advisor if additional assistance would be helpful with any questions or concerns I may have regarding this process. I understand that: As part of the placement process, students will select and prioritize three sites where they would like to have their resume sent one at a time for consideration of an interview. If a student goes on three interviews and either chooses to decline or is declined an internship, the Social Work Field Education Office reserves the right to consult the Program Chair about the student moving forward in the field selection process. It will be the responsibility of the Social Work Field Education Office, the Program Chair, and Associate Dean to determine if the student is an appropriate fit for the Social Work Program at this time. I also understand that: Information that I have communicated to a faculty member, my advisor, or practicum supervisor may be shared with the Social Work Leadership Team or other members of the faculty or Wheelock Student Success Team if it is felt that this information affects my wellbeing or ability to carry out my responsibilities as a BSW student. 73 My academic advisor has reviewed my responsibilities with me and has answered my questions to my satisfaction. I understand that failure to carry out the obligations outlined above will result in a delay in the practicum planning and placement process and, consequently, in a reduced pool of available practicum sites for me. Student Signature Print Student Name 74 Advisor Signature Date INTEGRATION WITH COURSE CONTENT The curriculum of both the BSW and MSW programs contains the purposeful integration of material embodying theory and evidence-based practice with learning that takes place in all levels of the field practicum experiences (BSW senior year, MSW Foundation year, and MSW Concentration Year). In the BSW Program, all pre-practicum courses relate content to experiences with clients that students will encounter in the future or have experienced in other settings. In the senior year, several of the practice course assignments in both semesters require students to use examples from the field in their exploration and analysis. Similarly, during this year, students are asked to demonstrate application of theories and concepts learned in class to their work with clients in their practicum settings in the context of the practicum seminars and Field Instructor supervision. In the MSW program, students are in the field throughout the Foundation and Concentration Years, which also provides the opportunity for this integration and reapplication of client-related content in the context of practice courses accompanying the practicum. In addition, other non-practice courses also intentionally relate content learned with student experiences in the field. 75 VI. THE MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK (MSW) PROGRAM DEGREE REQUIREMENTS AND COURSE DESCRIPTIONS For a detailed outline of degree requirements of the Master of Social Work (MSW) Program and description of courses please refer to the Wheelock College Catalog and the Wheelock College website. ADMISSION TO MSW PROGRAM The MSW Program is looking for students who reflect the program’s overall mission, goal, and philosophy. We have learned from application materials and from students and alumni that the attraction to our program is multi-fold: resonance with the college’s overall mission to improve the lives of children and families, which is deeply embedded in the MSW Program focus on children and families who are most disadvantaged and oppressed; the program’s core philosophy of a commitment to advancing human rights and social and economic justice; and lastly, the ideal of being educated and prepared with advanced competency, knowledge, and skills as a professional social worker who recognizes that all content areas of an MSW education (theory, research, policy, and practice) are examples of social work practice. As a program, we seek applicants who desire to make a commitment to human rights and social and economic justice—an education that develops and facilitates their professional identity towards becoming a justice-based practitioner–as the core of the profession’s purpose. In compliance with the standards set by CSWE, the MSW program does not grant credit for life or work experience. Admission Criteria – The specific requirements for admission into the MSW Program are: 1. As part of the admissions process to the MSW Program, all applicants are required to provide official transcripts showing degree conferral from accredited undergraduate programs and any completed graduate coursework. These transcripts from prior undergraduate and relevant graduate coursework must bear the college seal and arrive in unopened envelopes. 2. A grade point average of 3.0 or higher in the last two years of undergraduate study. 3. Some paid and/or volunteer human service experience. 4. An undergraduate education that reflects preparedness in the liberal arts and sciences. Specifically, applicants are required to have a minimum of 18 credit hours of study in the social sciences, behavior and life sciences, and the humanities. Applicants must have acquired content in human biology and statistics as part of their liberal arts prerequisites for admission. Accepted applicants who have not completed Human Biology and/or Statistics are required to take such course(s) either before (during the summer) or concurrent with (fall semester) the start of their first graduate semester. 5. A written essay that reflects an interest in the social justice mission of the profession and a particular interest in the focus of the Wheelock MSW Program. 6. Three (3) letters of reference are required. One should be of an academic nature from a faculty member who is familiar with the applicant's academic work (e.g., a former professor or instructor). The second reference should be from an individual who can discuss the applicant's work or relevant experience. The third letter may be either academic or professional at the applicant's discretion. References from family members and/or friends are not acceptable. Please note that additional letters of reference may be requested at the discretion of the Admission Committee. Applicants to the Social Work Advanced Standing program must provide a reference from their field liaison, field instructor, or director of the BSW program from which they graduated along with their 76 senior year fall and spring field evaluations. Request for Change of MSW Program Plan All Foundation Year MSW students are accepted on either a full-time or part-time (3-year or 4-year) basis. All Advanced Standing MSW students are accepted on either a full-time or part- time (2+year) basis. If a student wishes to change the Program Plan from the approved status at the time of acceptance, she/he must submit a “Request – Change of MSW Program Plan” form, signed by the student and Faculty Advisor, to the MSW Chair. All requests will be considered carefully, taking into account the learning needs of the student, progress in the program to date, and the external needs and resources of the MSW program. Students must meet with their advisors to discuss the compelling need for a change in program plan/status and should plan to request a change as far in advance of any internship-placement time period as possible, so that options for successful placement in the best possible internship site are maximized. 77 Wheelock College – Master of Social work Program Request – Change of MSW Program Plan Student Name: Date: (Print) Date you entered (or plan to enter) the MSW program: Current Program Plan: Foundation Year: FT 3-yr plan 3-yr Intensive 4-yr plan PT Advanced Standing: FT Other (explain) Requested Program Plan: Foundation Year: FT 3-yr plan 3-yr Intensive Advanced Standing: FT Other (explain): Reason for requesting change in program plan: New Anticipated Date of Graduation: Signatures: Student: Advisor: MSW Chair: Office use only: 78 Date: Date: Date: Program Plan upon Acceptance: 4-yr plan PT MSW ADVISING Advising is a central process in social work education and, as such, is congruent with the profession’s emphasis on the mentorship, guidance, and supervision that social workers provide to each other throughout the duration of their professional careers. In the MSW Program, at both the Boston and Worcester locations, advising begins the moment a prospective student inquires about the Program. From the very start, the MSW Program Chair, assisted by full- and half-time program faculty members, respond to interested individuals by phone, email, or by inviting them in for a campus visit. The MSW Program Chair and faculty members also represent the MSW Program at all admissions events, graduate open house events, and other college-wide sessions that are attended by potential applicants and their families. At these events, the attempt is made to educate those in attendance about the profession of social work as a whole and about the mission and justice-based emphasis of the MSW Program in particular. Frequently, these initial informational meetings initiate the beginning of relationships which continue when applicants actually become students. In both locations of the MSW Program, every accepted student is assigned a Faculty Advisor. In order to provide advising of the highest quality, all students in the MSW program are advised by full-time, tenure-track and tenured faculty, or by full- and half-time salaried contractual faculty. Whenever a new faculty member becomes a Faculty Advisor, the new advisor is mentored and supported by the MSW Program Chair for purposes of orientation and to ensure that the new faculty advisor fully understands the program and is able to advise in accordance with programmatic expectations. The Faculty Advisor has access to the student’s academic and course history, unofficial transcript, academic warnings (COMPASS referrals) issued by faculty, and the Faculty Field Liaison’s evaluation of the student’s performance in practicum. The student may choose to share her/his admission materials with the advisor. Advising begins in the summer prior to matriculation when incoming students receive a letter with the name and contact information of their Faculty Advisor. Students and faculty are in communication from this point on via email, telephone, and/or in person meetings. Particularly during the summer recess, the MSW Program Chair serves as the interim advisor, being available to answer questions about the program. During the fall orientation program, before the beginning of classes, students meet in small groups with their Faculty Advisor, and the formal advising relationship begins at that time. Meetings between the student and advisor take place at least once per semester. Students can also schedule meetings to see their advisor more frequently. In practice, most students meet with their advisors on a more frequent basis for purposes that include course planning, selection of graduate electives, discussion of specific current and post-graduate learning goals, and other issues identified by the student or advisor, with either one initiating initiate contact. Social Work Faculty Advisors have posted office hours and are flexible in providing additional times to meet with students in person or through telephone conferences. The Faculty Advisor is a source of information and support to the student throughout the course of study in the MSW Program. The following are some of the Faculty Advisor’s responsibilities: 79 explain the program’s curriculum, explain the student’s academic plan from the start of the program to graduation, and guide students in the selection of elective courses to meet the degree requirements and the student’s learning goals periodically evaluate the student’s performance and progress in the program contact the student when an academic warning (COMPASS Report) has been issued and jointly determine what additional services may be needed by the student (see COMPASS diagram below) refer the student to supportive services, such as counseling (through the college’s Counseling Center), writing assistance, and the like discuss with the student various fields of social work so that the student can make informed choices about field study, practicum assignments, and future work plans upon graduation encourage the student to participate actively in college and department activities, social work month celebrations, and the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) so that she/he may develop a professional identity inform and review with the student all relevant program and college policies, pointing out students’ right and responsibilities, and work closely with the student and other faculty to facilitate the best learning environment should concerns arise about the student’s academic or non-academic behavior discuss academic and/or career options with a student who is being asked to leave the MSW Program or who has decided voluntarily to withdraw from the program of the college Fill out and sign forms called for by the college’s or department’s academic policies. One of the major roles and responsibilities of the Faculty Advisor, in partnership with the student, is the ongoing evaluation of student performance towards mastery of core competencies and advanced practice behaviors. This process takes place through individualized advising appointments scheduled over the course of the academic year, and also through the use of the Student Support Team. Composed of half- and full-time social work faculty, this team meets once each semester to review the progress of all students attending in both locations of the program. The team addresses areas of particular strength in classroom learning and the field, academic progress, professional behavior and development, and writing skills. This strengths-based approach, which allows for acknowledgement of a student’s abilities as well as areas which may need attention and improvement, is consistent with the mission of the MSW Program. Following the review, the Faculty Advisor shares the constructive feedback of the team with each advisee within a two week period and follows up in order to support the student in addressing any needs that are identified (e.g. helping the student access resources for writing assistance). We are committed to having the review process be one of the many ways to provide all students with the most supportive educational environment possible. To that end, we are in continuous review of the team’s effectiveness, as with all other program activities, and welcome student and Field Instructor input at any time. Advising Students with Disabilities Faculty Advisors also work with several offices in the college including the Office of Academic Advising and Assistance (OAAA) to meet the needs of social work students with disabilities. The goals of this office are to ensure that all students with disabilities can actively participate in all facets of college life by providing and coordinating reasonable accommodations and support services and to increase the level of disability awareness among all members of the college community. Students are coached in learning to articulate their learning needs, in becoming their own advocates, and in using campus resources effectively. Students with documented learning or physical disabilities who require accommodations or support are asked to self-identify to the Coordinator of Disability and Support Services in the OAAA before matriculating. Accommodations are based on appropriate documentation from qualified evaluators. The OAAA will assist students in developing an appropriate plan of academic support. The OAAA Office encourages open communication by soliciting student inquiries, facilitating student-faculty dialogue, and providing consultations to students and faculty on disability-related issues. In addition, the OAAA collaborates with other campus offices to offer awareness programs and training seminars on such issues as the impact of learning disabilities in the college classroom, the implications of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and FERPA for educators, and helping students with disabilities succeed in internships and practica. 80 Wheelock College – MSW Program ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF UNDERSTANDING OF PRACTICUM POLICIES This is to acknowledge that I have read the following and discussed these policies with the Social Work Field Education Office staff. Practicum placement process Continuation in practicum Policy regarding incomplete grades Minimum grade policy Reinstatement in practicum I understand the following: 1. All part time Foundation Year students will begin their practicum in the second year of their program. 2. If I get a failing grade in SWK 540: Generalist Social Work Practice I, or SWK 541: Generalist Social Work Practice II, SWK 550: Social Work Field Practicum and Seminar I or SWK 551: Social Work Field Practicum and Seminar II, I will not be able to continue with the practice/practicum sequence in the second semester, and I will need to retake this course the following year. If I get a failing grade in SWK 640: Social Work Practice with Children and Families I, or SWK 641: Social Work Practice with Children and Families II, SWK 650: Social Work Field Practicum and Seminar I or SWK 651: Social Work Field Practicum and Seminar II, I will not be able to continue with the practice/practicum sequence in the second semester, and I will need to retake this course the following year. My graduation date may be delayed to complete this requirement. 3. If I obtain a grade lower than B- in any course other than SWK 550/551, SWK 540/541, SWK 640/641, or SWK 650/651, I may remain in my practicum but must repeat the course(s) and obtain at least a Bto continue in the program. My graduation date may be delayed to complete this requirement. 4. If I get a failing grade in practicum, I must seek permission of the Graduate Review Board (GRB) to repeat practicum by following the College’s procedures for reinstatement. 5. If I determine the need to withdraw from practicum, I will receive a failing grade unless I petition and receive approval from the GRB for consideration of extenuating circumstances. 6. “Incomplete” grades are only given in extenuating circumstances and need to be approved by the Faculty Field Liaison and Social Work Field Education Office. 7. If I receive a grade of “Incomplete” in SWK 550/551, SWK 540/541, SWK 640/641, SWK 650/651, I will need to complete all work successfully and submit it to the Faculty Field Liaison and Social Work Field Education Office so that the Incomplete is changed to a satisfactory grade prior to reentering practicum. Student Signature Date Print Student Name Social Work Field Education Staff Signature 81 Date Wheelock College – MSW program FIELD PRACTICUM PLANNING & PLACEMENT CONTRACT This contract is to acknowledge that I have read the field practicum placement process outlined below. I agree to: 1. Schedule a meeting with the Social Work Field Education office immediately after I have deposited if I am a full-time Foundation year, or an Advanced Standing student, and in response to e-mail communication from the Social Work Field Education Office if a part-time Foundation year student. The purpose of the meeting is to review the placement process, discuss questions I may have regarding the practicum policies and the practicum planning and placement process, and acknowledge my understanding of, and agreement with, the process and policies by signing both pages of this form. Please note that most field placement sites require students to be available during typical business hours, Monday-Friday, 8 a.m. – 5 p.m. A very limited number of field placement sites may be able to accommodate internship hours in the evenings and on weekends and cannot be guaranteed. 2. Provide the Social Work Field Education Office with an electronic copy of my resume and complete the Field Information Application form prior to my meeting. 3. Adhere to the time frame agreed upon in meeting with my assigned Social Work Field Education staff and keep her/him informed as to the progress of my placement interviews. Notify the Social Work Field Education staff when contacted for an interview, and also after the interview, if an offer is extended or not. 4. Check my Wheelock and my personal email and voicemail daily and inform the Social Work Field Education staff of any change in my contact information. 5. Students who would like to utilize the “Flexible Field” option must have this approved by the practicum site and fill out the associated paperwork prior to September 12th. 6. Students who would like to utilize the “Internship at Employment” option must have this approved by the Social Work Field Education Office and have the associated paperwork completed and submitted prior to September 12th. 7. Contact the Social Work Field Education Office or the MSW Program Chair if additional assistance would be helpful or if I have any questions regarding this process. I understand that: As part of the placement process, students will select and prioritize three sites where they would like to have their resume sent, one at a time, for consideration of an interview. If a student goes on three interviews and either chooses to decline or is declined an internship, the Social Work Field Education Office reserves the right to consult the Program Chair about the student moving forward in the field selection process. It will be the responsibility of the Social Work Field Education Office, the Program Chair, Faculty Advisor and Associate Dean of Social Work, to determine if the student is an appropriate fit for the Program at the current time. The Social Work Field Education Office staff member has reviewed my responsibilities with me and has answered my questions to my satisfaction. I understand that failure to carry out the obligations outlined above will result in a delay in the practicum planning and placement process and, consequently, in a reduced pool of available practicum sites for me. Student Signature Date Print Student Name Social Work Field Education Staff Signature 82 Date FOUNDATION YEAR CONTENT AND STRUCTURE The Wheelock College graduate social work curriculum is organized around a set of Foundation Year Practice Behaviors that are expressed in courses, curricular themes, field practicum, and other social work activities that prepare students for generalist social work practice with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. The Foundation Year Practice Behaviors are the measurable components of 10 Core Competencies provided in the Educational Policy and Standards (EPAS) of the Council on Social Work Education. The Wheelock College MSW program contextualizes these 41 practice behaviors within the college mission, program mission and goals and describes the knowledge, skills, and values students need to acquire and apply to their practice so that people and communities that have challenging life circumstances, particularly by oppression, poverty, and discrimination, can experience a sense of health and well-being. All of the degree requirements and course offerings in the Foundation Year of the MSW Program, both in Boston and Worcester, have been developed to provide students with the foundation of knowledge, values, and skills that comprise generalist practice. This area of social work is best defined by the Council on Social Work Education: “Generalist practice is grounded in the liberal arts and the person and environment construct. To promote human and social well-being, generalist practitioners use a range of prevention and intervention methods in their practice with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. The generalist practitioner identifies with the social work profession and applies ethical principles and critical thinking in practice. Generalist practitioners incorporate diversity in their practice and advocate for human rights and social and economic justice. They recognize, support, and build on the strengths and resiliency of all human beings. They engage in research-informed practice and are proactive in responding to the impact of context on professional practice” (EPAS, 2008, Educational Policy B2.2). The set of Foundation Year Practice Behaviors describes what constitutes the social work foundation content and how students will acquire it. Students will be prepared through their courses, field work, and other learning experiences to learn and apply the 10 core competencies and 41 practice behaviors that comprise the Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards developed by the Council on Social Work Education (See Section II Introduction to the Social Work Profession). These Foundation Year Practice Behaviors incorporate the core set of required, sequential foundation courses in five substantive areas: theoretical foundations of human behavior and the social environment, the history of social welfare and social policies, foundational research methods, generalist social work practice, and the field seminar and practicum. The field practicum requires a minimum of 16 hours a week in a field agency. In the first year of the field practicum, students bring to the field the knowledge, skills, and values they are learning in the classroom, and bring back to the classroom the experiences within the field, in an attempt to apply theory, historical knowledge, and practice wisdom. They are also testing their ability to apply theory and knowledge, as well as historical, economic, and cultural context, to their experiences with individuals, families, and groups of all sizes. The Foundation Year requires a minimum of 30 credits for students (15 per semester) who are enrolled in a two year, full-time, 60 credit program. Both Boston and Worcester students have the option to complete the program part-time (5 or more credits per semester), and therefore credit load may vary by semester. The offerings by semester are illustrated in the various program plans provided in the Wheelock College Catalog and on the college website. 83 The field components of the MSW Program follow the Educational Policy of the Council on Social Work Education which considers Field Education to be the Signature Pedagogy. “Signature pedagogy represents the central form of instruction and learning in which a profession socializes its students to perform the role of practitioner. Professionals have pedagogical norms with which they connect and integrate theory and practice. In social work, the signature pedagogy is field education. The intent of field education is to connect the theoretical and conceptual contribution of the classroom with the practical world of the practice setting. It is a basic precept of social work education that the two interrelated components of curriculum, classroom and field are of equal importance within the curriculum, and each contributes to the development of the requisite competencies of professional practice. Field education is systemically designed, supervised, coordinated, and evaluated based on criteria by which students demonstrate the achievement of program competencies” (EPAS, 2008, Educational Policy 2.3). Concentration Year Content and Structure Building on the Foundation Year’s generalist practice behavior, a second component of the MSW Program is a set of advanced practice behaviors that describe the program’s definition of advanced practice behaviors along with knowledge, skills, and values, and the content students will acquire to graduate as advanced, justice-based social work practitioners. The Concentration Year Advanced Practice Behaviors have been crafted by Wheelock College faculty as the advanced measurable components of the 10 Core Competencies provided in the 2008 Educational Policy and Standards (EPAS) of the Council on Social Work Education. The advanced year emphasizes a single concentration on human rights and justice-based practice with children and families that specifically prepares students to effect change in the issues implicated in their life chances and well-being, particularly for families who are at-risk for or are experiencing discrimination, poverty, violence, special health and education needs, and the like. All of the degree requirements and course offerings in the Concentration Year of the MSW Program have been developed to provide students with the opportunity to build on the foundation of knowledge, values, and skills that comprise generalist practice, and which reach to a level of nuanced understanding, application, and reflective practice with children and families. In the concentration year, content is more specialized and integrated horizontally across the concentration year curriculum. This area of social work is best defined by the Council on Social Work Education: “Advanced practitioners refine and advance the quality of social work practice and that of the larger social work profession. They synthesize and apply a broad range of interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary knowledge and skills. In areas of specialization, advanced practitioners assess, intervene, and evaluate to promote human and social well-being. To do so they suit each action to the circumstances at hand, using the discrimination learned through experience and self-improvement. Advanced practice incorporates all of the Core Competencies augmented by knowledge and practice behaviors specific to a concentration.” (EPAS, 2008, Educational Policy M2.2). ADVANCED PRACTICE BEHAVIORS Students will be prepared, through their courses, field work, and other learning experiences, to 84 demonstrate their ability to do the following: Professional Identity Demonstrate integration of self-reflection and self-care, applied differential use of self, and growth through use of supervision and consultation in service of the development of a professional social work identity that is action-oriented, strengths and justice based, and progressively taking a leadership stance in all professional settings. Ethical Practice Demonstrate the capacity to analyze complex individual, family, group, organizational, and community issues and solutions that directly apply to social work ethics, reasoning, and practice principles that advance human rights and social and economic justice. Critical Thinking Apply principles of logic, scientific inquiry, and reasoning discernment. Critical thinking also requires the synthesis and communication of relevant information. Utilize critical thinking augmented by creativity, curiosity, and continual professional development. Diversity Develop an increasingly explicit and integrated approach to global human diversity applying an intersectional analysis to the evaluation and articulation of the effects of power and privilege, including one’s own location in these dynamics. Human Rights Design, analyze, strategize, and advocate with client systems on behalf of the human rights of individuals and groups whose lived experiences and sociocultural memberships represent varying degrees of power, privilege, and oppression. Research-Based Practice Access, assess, apply, and evaluate research findings to inform justice-based practice with children and families. Human Behavior Critically evaluate and apply human behavior and the social environment theories in justice-based, multiculturally responsible ways to promote social change. Policy Practice Demonstrate the ability to take a leadership role in effective collaboration in the design, implementation, and evaluation of a policy practice that advances human rights and social justice. Practice Context Utilize emerging scientific and technological developments and societal trends to provide optimal services as part of an ecosystemic and justice based approach in all areas of practice and to support professional development and life-long learning. Engage, Assess, Intervene, and Evaluate Demonstrate the advanced ability to synthesize social work knowledge, skills, and values, and use of self to plan, implement, and critically evaluate practice and collaboration with diverse individuals, families, and larger systems. 85 These advanced practice behaviors are incorporated in a core set of required, sequential concentration courses in social policy/practice, advanced practice with children and families accompanied by an advanced field practicum and seminar, and an integrative seminar culminating in a human rights action project. The Concentration Year builds on and integrates the knowledge, values, and skills gained in the Foundation Year. The field practicum requires 24 hours a week in a field agency. During the second year of the field curriculum, students practice in an agency related to the concentration on children and families who are at risk for multiple social conditions that affect their life chances and well-being. Thus, in all aspects of their second year, whether policy, practice, theory, or research, students are applying knowledge from this coursework into their practicum and are bringing experiences, ethical dilemmas, and complex systemic realities from their placement into the on-going discourse within their core social work courses. The Concentration Year requires a minimum of 30 credits for students who are enrolled in a two-year, full-time, 60 credit program. For Advanced Standing students, in addition to the 30 credits for those students who are enrolled in a one-year, full-time, 36 credit program, 6 credits are completed prior to the concentration year within the Summer Gateway Program. In sum, the curriculum plan demonstrates a coherent, fully developed, 60-credit, two-year, fulltime program of study that leads to a Master’s Degree in Social Work, with a concentration area in practice with children and families. Students show mastery of 10 Core Competencies measured through 41 practice behaviors at the Foundation Year, and 10 advanced practiced behaviors at the Concentration Year. The program has a defined, single concentration on children and families, particularly those at risk for poverty, homelessness, school failure, violence, and the like. It focuses on preparing advanced, justice-based practitioners and leaders with the knowledge, skills, and values to intervene and effect change in the social conditions that are implicated in the life chances and well-being of children and families. ADVANCED STANDING MSW PROGRAM – Boston & Worcester Any student who has earned a BSW degree within the last five years from a CSWE-accredited program is welcome to apply for advanced standing status. Acceptance is based on faculty review of the student’s academic record, field performance, social work related practice, references, and fit with the Program’s mission. If accepted into the advanced standing program, students enter directly into the Advanced Standing Summer Gateway Program. This 6-credit summer program is designed to immerse these graduate students in Wheelock’s justice-based philosophy and the curricular themes that are foundational to preparation for advanced graduate course and field work. It builds on the students’ beginning competencies, knowledge, skills, and values through a two-month intensive course and 100-hour field-based experience, furthering the mastery of the Core Competencies and Practice Behaviors set forth in the Educational Policy and Standards requirements of CSWE. Upon successful completion of the Gateway, the students enter into the 30credit advanced, concentration year curriculum. This curriculum provides students with advanced professional social work knowledge, skills, and values that are strengths-based and empowerment focused, so that, as graduates, they are able to work effectively toward justice-based change at the individual, family, group, community, and structural/systems levels. All students in the advanced year concentrate in social work practice with children and families that will actively advance human rights and social and economic justice in partnership with client systems and their providers, through the study of advanced theory, research, policy, and direct practice skills and participation in an advanced field practicum and an integrative capstone project that is focused on human rights action in a specific area. 86 The Concentration/Advanced Year of the program is organized around a singular concentration on human rights and justice, particularly in the lives of children, families, and their communities that are most at risk for not being able to participate fully in society’s services, resources, and supports. Some of the conditions that put families at risk include, but are not limited to, poverty, homelessness, violence, substance abuse, long-term individual and group marginalization and discrimination, incarceration, special health and education needs, immigrant or refugee status, and religious or spiritual diversity. Full time Advanced Standing study, offered only in the Boston location, is completed in a threesemester, one year (summer, fall and spring) schedule. Advanced Standing part-time study is offered in both Boston and Worcester. The Boston based program is completed in a 2+ year (summer, followed by two consecutive years of fall and spring) schedule and is a 36 credit program. The Worcester based program is completed in one year and summer semester (summer, fall, spring, summer) for a total of 38 credits. Classes are taught by Boston-based and adjunct Wheelock faculty members with extensive experience and expertise working with urban populations. Classes are conveniently held in Central Massachusetts on the campus of Anna Maria College on weeknights. This program is also fully accredited by the Council on Social Work Education. MSW PART-TIME PROGRAM OPTIONS The MSW Program provides three options for part-time students to complete the program: three years; three years with one weekend intensive per semester and a summer session; and four years. At the time of acceptance into the program, students are provided with these options and are allowed to choose the option that works best for them, unless acceptance was contingent on a specific program status enrollment. Students who begin the MSW program full-time, but for a variety of reasons may need to change their enrollment status to part-time must do so in consult with their Faculty Advisor. MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK WORCESTER OFF-CAMPUS DEGREE This 3-year part-time, 60-credit MSW program offers an educational setting in central Massachusetts, about an hour from Wheelock College’s Boston-based campus. This program runs in a cohort model of 20-25 students and the courses and content parallel that taught on the Boston campus. The program is accredited by the Council on Social Work Education. Students will attain an appropriate level of mastery of the Core Competencies and Practice Behaviors identified in the Educational Policy and Standards established by this accrediting agency. Students complete this program in 8 semesters, with the first summer off, taking 6-9 credits per semester. The MSWWorcester program begins in the fall semester. DUAL DEGREE MSW AND MS IN NONPROFIT LEADERSHIP AND SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP The dual MSW/MS in Nonprofit Leadership and Social Entrepreneurship degree offers the student interested in human service administration careers a unique opportunity. Students will develop justice-based social work competence, nonprofit leadership and social entrepreneurship skills, and the general orientation to human services that is necessary to perform as a leader in the human services sector. Dual degree graduates are well positioned to become administrators and policy leaders in organizations that deliver social services. While completing their requirements for the MSW Program, students begin coursework for the Nonprofit Leadership and Social Entrepreneurship Master’s degree. The completion of this program prepares students to take on administrative, executive, and leadership positions. 87 Through a series of required courses and advanced electives, students gain the knowledge, skills, and values necessary to assume leadership roles. Students will learn to build effective multicultural organizations, where the talents and contributions of individuals from diverse backgrounds are recognized, respected, and valued. Students complete the MSW degree in its entirety and are eligible for social work licensure, enabling them to work as a social worker while they complete the final part-time year of Nonprofit Leadership and Social Entrepreneurship courses. There are three program options. Students can enroll in the Dual Degree program as full-time, part-time, or Advanced-Standing MSW students. GRADUATE CERTIFICATES In consultation with their Faculty Advisor, MSW students can consider completing a graduate certificate within their program. MSW graduate program plans provide six elective credits. These credits, along with additional certificate course credits, allow students to complete their certificate of interest usually within one year. Once a student has identified her/his certificate of interest, she/he must complete the “Certificate Declaration Form,” have it signed by the Faculty Advisor, and then submit it to the Director of the designated certificate. Early Childhood Mental Health This certificate prepares masters-level social workers to provide mental health services to children and their families in a variety of early childhood settings. Through the four courses of this certificate, social work students will develop expertise in early childhood development, psychosocial risk and resilience, clinical practice with young children and families, and consultation to early care and education providers. All courses emphasize culturally relevant, strengths-based, and evidence-informed approaches to assessment and intervention. Medical Social Work: Healthcare Advocacy and Practice in Health Care Settings This 12-credit certificate is designed to prepare masters-level social work students to enter into the health care field in a variety of social work roles. The certificate combines theoretical approaches with hand-on skills to prepare social workers for demanding and fast-paced health care environments. Nonprofit Leadership and Social Entrepreneurship This 12-credit program provides the additional knowledge and skills needed to take on leadership and executive positions in a variety of settings. Nonprofit organizations are among the largest employers in Massachusetts, yet trends predict a shortage of qualified leadership in the coming years. This certificate is designed to address these emerging trends by providing students with the theory, skills, and knowledge needed to advance in nonprofit management. The four courses in this program can also fulfill some of the requirements for the MSW degree. MSW FIELD PRACTICUM The field practicum enables students to integrate the knowledge and skills they are learning in the classroom with hands-on, agency-based experience with clients and client systems. It is also an opportunity for students to affirm the values of the profession and to learn what it means to be an ethical, justice-based social work practitioner. Specific to the program year, students are required to complete a minimum number of hours in the field for the academic year. These required hours meet and may exceed the requirements for field hours consistent with the curriculum policy statement provided by the Council on Social Work Education (CSWE). The following policies and procedures govern the practicum experience for students. 88 According to the 2008 Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards (EPAS) of CSWE, field education is the “signature pedagogy” of social work education. As such, it “represents the central form of instruction and learning in which a profession socializes its students to perform the role of practitioner.” The Wheelock College Social Work Field Practicum Policies are constructed and implemented to reflect this formulation. FOUNDATION YEAR FIELD PRACTICUM During the Foundation Year practicum, students are expected to apply the generalist practice perspective they are learning through classroom-based courses and to have experiences with individuals, groups, families, organizations, and communities. The Foundation Year objectives guide the expectations for student performance and outcomes. All Foundation Year students in Boston and Worcester are expected to: be on site at least 16 hours weekly over the course of the academic year of the Foundation practicum, completing a minimum total of 480 hours for the full academic year; engage weekly in at least one hour of face-to-face supervision provided by an MSW who has at least two years of post-graduate experience and is preferably licensed at the LCSW or LICSW level; and, commit to the placement for a full academic year, regardless if minimum hours are fulfilled prior to the end of the academic calendar. FOUNDATION YEAR PRACTICUM LEARNING OUTCOMES At the end of the Foundation Year, students will be able to do the following: demonstrate the ability to practice with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities, including populations at risk, from an ecological and systems perspective; demonstrate the ability to apply knowledge and research about culture, gender, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, social class, and the like and to practice approaches that celebrate differences and affirm human rights and social justice; demonstrate knowledge of the needs of clients and client systems, knowledge of community resources and service delivery systems, and the ability to obtain services for clients and client systems; demonstrate the ability to practice according to the NASW Code of Ethics; demonstrate the ability to practice using strengths-based and empowering approaches; demonstrate the ability to interview, build relationships, assess, intervene, and evaluate diverse clients and client systems; demonstrate the ability to assess service delivery systems from a human rights, social and economic justice, and values and ethics perspective in order to begin to learn how to equitably distribute services, resources, and supports for all clients and client systems; demonstrate the ability to use family-centered and community-based practice approaches; demonstrate the ability to evaluate one’s own practice in relation to personal values, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors; demonstrate the ability to use knowledge from social policy, social research, and human behavior and the social environment to inform and improve practice; demonstrate the ability to understand the use of interprofessional, collaborative approaches 89 to obtain and provide services which are integrated, coordinated, and identified as helpful by clients and client systems; and, demonstrate understanding and effective use of supervision. CONCENTRATION YEAR FIELD PRACTICUM During the Concentration Year practicum, students will be placed in an agency/setting where they can demonstrate advanced skills and practices which focus on some aspect of work with children and families, particularly groups of children and families whose life chances and well-being are challenged by issues of poverty, homelessness, violence, and the like. The Concentration Year objectives guide the expectations for student performance and outcomes. Because the Worcester MSW Program was designed for part-time students, the Concentration year field placement reflects necessary student needs. All Concentration Year students in Boston are expected to: Be on site at least 24 hours weekly throughout the Concentration Year, completing a minimum total of 720 hours for the full academic year. Engage weekly in at least one hour of face-to-face supervision provided by an MSW who has at least two years of post-graduate experience and is licensed at the LCSW or LICSW level. Commit to the placement for a full academic year, regardless if minimum hours are fulfilled prior to the end of the academic calendar. All Concentration Year students in Worcester are expected to: Be on site at least 16 hours weekly throughout the concentration year (fall, spring, and summer), completing a minimum total of 720 hours for the full academic year including the summer. Engage weekly in at least one hour of face-to-face supervision provided by an MSW who has at least two years of post-graduate experience and is licensed at the LCSW or LICSW level. Commit to the placement for a full placement period, regardless if minimum hours are fulfilled prior to the end of the placement period. CONCENTRATION YEAR PRACTICUM LEARNING OUTCOMES At the end of the Concentration Year of study, students will be able to do the following: demonstrate the ability to apply advanced practice skills autonomously and independently to work with vulnerable and disadvantaged groups of children, families, and communities; demonstrate leadership in applying family-centered, community-based, strengths-based, and diversity- affirming approaches to practice with vulnerable and disadvantaged groups of children and families; apply advanced knowledge of human behavior, the social environment, policy, and research to the obstacles facing children and families; demonstrate the ability to plan, research, organize, and advocate for new services, resources, and supports needed for children and families, particularly immigrant and refugee families, families experiencing violence, families whose children have special health and education needs, and the like; demonstrate leadership in interprofessional, collaborative approaches and practices which are based on partnerships with children, families, professionals, and communities 90 and which lead to the implementation of more integrated, coordinated, and familyfriendly systems of services; demonstrate the ability to evaluate one’s own practice as well as the practice of the systems serving children and families and to use a human rights and social justice lens for systems evaluation; demonstrate the ability to communicate effectively and differentially with diverse client groups, communities, interprofessional colleagues, and service systems; demonstrate leadership in the analysis and evaluation of the impact of social policies on clients and client systems, especially oppressed groups of children and families and the ability to work toward influencing and changing such policies; identify and critically analyze ethical dilemmas and complex practice issues which characterize social work practice with vulnerable groups of children and families; and, demonstrate effective use of supervision and consultation from children and families, as well as from other internal and external experts, in relation to high quality practice with vulnerable and disadvantaged groups of children, families, and communities. FLEXIBLE FIELD OPTION The MSW Program at Wheelock College is committed to providing support and flexibility to students so that they have the greatest opportunity to be successful in achieving academic and professional goals. Being mindful that many of these students are not only graduate students but may also be juggling an array of professional and personal responsibilities, we work with the individual student, his/her Faculty Advisor, and the potential field practicum site to craft a program plan that best suits the student’s individual needs (e.g., extended/”flex” field placement). The student is still required to meet all the requirements of her/his educational program and to fulfill the expectations of the practicum site. Please note that most field placement sites require students to be available during typical business hours, Monday-Friday, 8 a.m. – 5 p.m. A very limited number of field placement sites may be able to accommodate internship hours in the evenings and on weekends and cannot be guaranteed. Students who would like to utilize the “Flexible Field” option must have this approved by the practicum site and fill out the associated paperwork prior to September 12th. Foundation Year MSW students utilizing the Flexible Field Option are required to be in field a minimum of 12 hours a week. Concentration Year MSW students utilizing the Flexible Field Option are required to be in field a minimum of 16 hours a week. Foundation and Concentration Year students who will be in the field for 30 or more hours before the academic year begins and/or after the academic year ends will be required to register for, attend, and pay for the 2-credit summer Field Seminar and Practicum (SWK 554/654). Foundation and Concentration Year students who have not completed their hours in field by the time grades close will receive an “R,” indicating that they are in the process of completing their hours. For graduating Concentration Year students, the Registrar’s office can provide necessary degree completion documentation for employment and/or licensing purposes. Once final grades have been entered, students will receive their official diploma in August. 91 VII. SOCIAL WORK FIELD PRACTICUM POLICIES The policies, procedures and guidelines contained in this document are not intended to be allinclusive and are subject to change by the College, the School, and the Social Work Department as deemed necessary and appropriate. These changes will be announced if and when they occur. EVALUATION OF PROFESSIONAL SUITABILITY IN SOCIAL WORK PRACTICUM Evaluation in a social work practicum is an extension of the many ways that students are evaluated in relation to professional suitability, beginning with the admission process and continuing throughout the expected course of study for students in the BSW and MSW program. Even after graduation, it is expected that students, as professional social workers, will be engaged in various types of ongoing evaluation of themselves and their practice. Wherever they practice, students are expected to develop into reflective practitioners and leaders who understand and value ongoing, lifelong learning and evaluation of self in relation to practice and to the ethics and values of the social work profession. Throughout each two-semester field practicum experience, professional suitability of BSW and MSW students will be evaluated in multiple ways through use of: the learning contract, which is developed by the student in collaboration with the agency Field Instructor, assignments such as process recordings and summaries, semester-end evaluations within the context of field seminar, Faculty Field Liaison site visits, participation and assignments in seminar class, and professionalism in the seminar and field placement. It is expected that such evaluation is ongoing throughout the various components of the practicum curriculum. EXPLANATION OF TERMS USED IN RELATION TO THE PRACTICUM EXPERIENCE Practicum – the term used to designate the BSW and MSW student field experience; used interchangeably with “field placement” and “internship” in the Social Work Program. Director of Social Work Field Education – a member of the Social Work Program at Wheelock College who oversees all practicum related activities at the BSW and MSW levels; works individually with students throughout the placement planning and selection process; also responsible for cultivating partnerships with social work agencies to identify, establish, and maintain placement opportunities for Wheelock students. Assistant Director of Social Work Field Education – a member of the Social Work Program at Wheelock College who assists the Director of Social Work Field Education in executing all Field Education related functions. Social Work Field Education Advisor – a member of the Social Work Program at Wheelock College who assists the Director and Assistant Director of Social Work Field Education in executing all Field Education related functions. Faculty Advisor - the Social Work faculty member who is the designated advisor for the student in relation to all courses and academic issues, including the practicum; does not usually become actively involved in the practicum experience unless there is a situation that would benefit from her/his input or participation. 92 Field Instructor – the individual who is the primary supervisor for the practicum student while at the practicum agency; must hold an MSW degree and appropriate licensure; meets with the student in face-to-face supervision at least one hour/week; maintains responsibility for monitoring student data forms, providing feedback on process recordings, and end- of-semester evaluations in collaboration with the student and the Faculty Field Liaison (and agency supervisor, when relevant). Agency Supervisor – a position that applies only when the practicum agency does not have an onsite supervisor available who has an MSW degree and licensure at the required level; usually supervises the student in daily tasks and responsibilities, management of cases, and problem solving; functions in collaboration with the Field Instructor, who maintains the primary responsibility for student supervision in the field. Faculty Field Liaison – a member of the Social Work faculty at Wheelock College who serves as the liaison between a designated group of students and their practicum sites. In this capacity, he/she meets with each student and Agency Supervisor and/or Field Instructor at least three times throughout the academic year and assigns the final practicum grade of pass or fail at the end of each semester. He/she also conducts a bi-weekly seminar for the students in this designated group. PLACEMENT PROCESS Implementation of the placement process is shared by the Director of Field Education, the Assistant Director, and Social Work Field Education Advisor who work closely with the students and field practicum sites to assure placements appropriate to the student’s interests and needs. BSW At the BSW level, the process begins in the junior year when the student completes the academic requirements necessary to enter practicum. These requirements include completion of SWK 205: Intro to SWK, SWK 227: Dynamics of Oppression and Privilege, HDP 120/122 & HDP 121/123: Human Growth and Development, the Wheelock Literacy and Communication Exam (the WLCE), completion or current enrollment in SWK 440: Social Work Practice I, and current enrollment in SWK 355: Social Welfare Policy and Practice. MSW At the MSW level, the process begins when the student accepts an offer of admission and makes a deposit into the Social Work Program. Concentration Year MSW students meet with their assigned Field Education staff member in the winter prior to starting their Concentration Year practicum. Both BSW and MSW students follow the same process: Students complete a Field Information Sheet and send it to the Social Work Field Education Office. A member of the Field Education Office contacts the student to schedule an individual meeting. During the individual meetings, students discuss their prior field or community service experience, explore their educational goals, and indicate the types of agencies that interest them. In response, the student’s assigned Field Education staff member will discuss possible internships to consider. Students will be asked to select and prioritize three sites to which the student’s assigned Field Education staff member will send their resume to one at a time. 93 It is the goal for each student to be placed prior to the beginning of the relevant semester. Once a student’s resume has been sent to his/her top site, the student’s assigned Field Education staff member will send the student an email stating that the resume has been sent and the site will respond directly to set up and interview. If the first placement is not successful, the process will be repeated with the student’s second choice and then the student’s third choice, if necessary. It is the responsibility of the student to keep the assigned Field Education staff member informed when an interview is scheduled. Students must also contact their assigned Field Education staff member immediately if they have chosen a site or if the site has offered them a placement. For all social work students entering the field, appropriate agency sites are selected by the student’s assigned Field Education staff member and the student as the result of a collaborative process. Students are allowed to identify potential sites on their own. However, students should not be reaching out to potential sites directly. The student’s assigned Field Education staff member will be responsible for establishing new partnerships. The site must be officially approved in order for the field placement to occur. Within 24 hours of the completed interview, the student is expected to share feedback about the interview with the assigned Field Education staff member who also solicits agency feedback in order to confirm the placement. Only when a mutual decision is reached by the student, Field Instructor, and the student’s assigned Field Education staff member is a placement finalized. Once the selection of an agency site is finalized, the Social Work Field Education Office sends a Practicum Memorandum of Understanding to the agency. FIELD PLACEMENT INTERVIEW PROCESS POLICY As part of the Field Education placement process, students are required to select and prioritize the top three sites where they would like the Social Work Field Education Office to send their resume for consideration of an interview. If a student struggles to secure interviews with several agencies or goes on three interviews and either chooses to decline or is declined an internship, the Social Work Field Education Office reserves the right to consult with the Social Work Program Chair about the student moving forward in the field selection process. It will be the responsibility of the Social Work Field Education Office, Social Work Program Chair and Associate Dean to determine if the student is an appropriate fit for the Social Work Program at this time. CRIMINAL OFFENDER RECORD INFORMATION (CORI) AND OTHER BACKGROUND CHECKS As students begin and move through the placement process, practicum sites may request a Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI), which is a criminal background check conducted by human service agencies throughout the state, as well as nationwide. Its purpose is to attempt to protect both the very young and the very old from exposure to abuse by those who have a history of abusing children and/or elderly persons. In December, 1996, a law was passed in Massachusetts to require certain agencies serving children and the elderly to conduct CORI checks on all volunteers and staff retained or hired after March, 1997. Social work students should be aware that they may be required by the Field Practicum site to obtain CORI clearance prior to beginning the practicum experience. Students should also keep in mind that these same sites may now also require a SORI (Sexual Offender Record Information) authorization and drug screening. 94 A positive check showing a record of criminal offense (including any conviction or plea of guilty, a plea of no contest, a suspended imposition of execution of sentence, any period of probation or parole or finding that an individual committed or attempted to commit a crime), a sex offender registry status, or drug use may preclude a student from participating in placement and completing the requirements of the degree. The determination of whether such a student may participate in a placement is made at the discretion of the placement site. Wheelock College is unable to guarantee a field placement for such students. Moreover, a positive criminal or sex offender record check may preclude a graduate from becoming licensed to work in their field of study. Students are strongly encouraged to consult with their appropriate licensure board or organization concerning their ability to obtain licensure and work in their chosen field in the future. Because some placement sites do not run CORI checks on interns and Wheelock is not certified to run CORI checks, students may be required to run a CORI check on themselves. If this is the case, the Social Work Field Education Office will notify the student and provide instructions on how to get a CORI check. STUDENT SAFETY IN THE FIELD Social Work students are oriented to best practices regarding safety in the field in their Field Seminar during the BSW Senior Year, MSW Foundation Year and Advanced Standing Summer Gateway Program. In addition, as part of the Learning Contract, students are required to work with their placement site to review agency-specific safety protocol and procedures. RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE SOCIAL WORK PRACTICUM STUDENT Rights Social Work Practicum Students have the right to: Indicate a general preference for certain client populations and agency types in planning for practicum and to have this preference taken into consideration by the Social Work Field Education Office; however, there is no guarantee that students can be placed in their preferred choice of setting; When difficulties cannot be resolved by a collaborative process involving the student, the Faculty Field Liaison, Field Instructor, Agency Supervisor, the Director of Social Work Field Education, and the Faculty Advisor, and when the difficulties do not arise from student’s documented inability to meet the demands of the practicum, students may request a change in practicum placement, with the understanding that any disruption in placement may delay the student’s completion of their program. Apply for reinstatement in a practicum after voluntarily withdrawing for documented health reasons or after failing the practicum, by following the process of reinstatement detailed in the Social Work Division Field Practicum Manual; Assess the overall Field Practicum experience provided by the agency by completing an evaluation of the practicum site. Be treated with courtesy, respect, and fairness by all members of the practicum site and faculty related to the practicum, and not to be discriminated against on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, gender, religion, political orientation, sexual orientation, physical or mental disabilities, marital status, or socioeconomic status; 95 Receive prompt feedback on practicum assignments, and to be alerted, in a timely manner with a COMPASS Report about problems in performance in the practicum, and to be informed of what is needed to correct or change or improve, the timeline, and the consequences; Be informed of the results of the Social Work Student Support Team student review process within two weeks of the completion of the review; and, Appeal a practicum grade and/or academic dismissal by following the appeals process detailed in the Wheelock College Catalog. Responsibilities Social Work Students are expected to: Attend the Field Practicum as scheduled for the required hours and the days agreed upon between student and Field Instructor, in consultation with the Faculty Field Liaison; Make a commitment to the Field Practicum site for a full academic year1. Early fulfillment of hours does not exempt a student from this commitment; Complete the minimum requirement of field hours as specified by program and year2; Notify the Field Instructor if unable to be at the agency on any scheduled day (in case of absence from field work, arrangements must be made with the Field Instructor to make up the missed time); Meet with the Field Instructor weekly for a minimum of one hour of face to face supervision and take an active role in the supervision process; Provide the Field Instructor with process recordings as required by Field Seminar and by the Field Instructor; Complete timesheet, “Weekly Report on Field Practicum,”3 each week and submit to the Faculty Field Liaison during scheduled Field Seminar meetings or as requested; Participate in the required number of site visit conferences with both the Field Instructor and the Faculty Field Liaison each year4 as specified by program and year; Share responsibility with the Field Instructor in preparing a Field Practicum learning contract; Actively utilize other Field Seminar students for practicum consultation through Moodle and in class case presentation and discussion; Discuss any difficulties regarding the Field Practicum experience, first with the Field Instructor, and, if necessary, with the Faculty Field Liaison; Consult with the Field Instructor prior to any use of case material in the classroom; Actively take part in self-evaluation throughout the year, including a written self-evaluation at the end of each semester as part of the end of semester evaluation; Complete all required field evaluation forms at the end of the Field Practicum. 1 This commitment to the field practicum site is expected of all students, including those who complete their field requirements through the flex-field option. 2 BSW students complete a minimum of 400 hours for the academic year. Foundation Year MSW students complete a minimum of 480 hours, Graduate Year MSW students complete a minimum of 720 hours and Advanced Standing students complete a minimum of 820 hours for the academic year. This minimum requirement is applicable to all students in the flex-field option. 3 Along with the Weekly Report on Field Practicum, students must complete Part II which requires identification of CWSE Core Competencies and practice experience. This form is also submitted weekly. 4 For BSW and MSW students, there are a minimum of three site visits per year. 96 SUPPORT FOR STUDENTS The Faculty Field Liaison Each student is assigned a social work faculty member who serves as the Faculty Field Liaison for the duration of the practicum. The Faculty Field Liaison is also the faculty member teaching the Field Seminar course. The seminar is a required course that runs concurrently with the practicum experience. This structure facilitates the development of a close working relationship between the Faculty Field Liaison and the student while in Field Practicum. The Faculty Field Liaison supports the student’s learning at the practicum, mediates in cases of conflict between the Field Instructor and the student, and encourages the student to be assertive and professional in interactions with the Field Instructor and in the placement setting. In instances where conflict cannot be resolved or where the student is not able to meet the demands of the practicum, the Faculty Field Liaison has a particularly important role to play and must follow guidelines for a change in practicum and/or withdrawal of the student from the placement. For more information, please refer to the “Process for Change in Practicum,” Withdrawal from Practicum,” and “Reinstatement in Practicum” sections of this manual. Orientation At the beginning of the academic year, students are required to attend a Field Practicum orientation meeting on campus. For BSW students, this meeting will be scheduled separately before the start of Field Practicum. For MSW students, this meeting usually occurs during graduate orientation and during the first Field Seminar class. The purpose of these meetings is to give students information and support in a variety of ways. During this meeting students receive the Social Work Student Handbook and Field Practicum Manual and the Practicum Calendar. Social Work Field Education staff review the purpose and structure of the practicum, discuss expectations of students, and address concerns raised by students. Field Seminar The Field Seminar course is taken concurrently with the practicum and social work practice courses in both the fall and spring semesters. The seminar provides a forum for the integration of knowledge, skills, and values acquired through coursework with practicum experiences. Students are expected to take an active role in raising questions, identifying issues for discussion, and actively helping one another to apply knowledge to field experiences and the solution of problems. Students learn a great deal from one another as they share their practicum experiences in a variety of settings. To provide continuity and ongoing support for the student, this course is instructed by the assigned Faculty Field Liaison. Social Work Student Support Team In an effort to provide students with optimal support in both the BSW and MSW programs, the Social Work Student Support Team (consisting of social work faculty) meets each semester to collectively assess student progress in academic and field work and to address any emergent needs in a timely way. In addition to the many ways faculty seeks to help each student individually, the Support Team review is a thoughtful and creative forum in which to generate ideas for best supporting students to succeed. In a process originally designed by faculty, along with BSW and MSW student input, the Team reviews student each semester for strengths and challenges in three key areas: academic work, professional development and behavior, and writing skills. We are committed to having the review 97 process be one of the many ways to provide students with the most supportive educational environment possible. To that end, we are in continuous review of the Team’s effectiveness, as with all other program activities, and welcome student and Field Instructor input at any time. STUDENT INJURIES If a student is injured during Field Practicum, she/he needs to contact their Field Instructor and/or Agency Supervisor immediately. The Field Instructor is responsible for completing and submitting an accident/incident report, within 24 hours to the Director of Social Work Field Education. The report should include the following information: Name of student, agency, and Field Instructor (and Agency Supervisor, if applicable) Names and titles of people who witnessed the incident Names and titles of parties involved in the incident including: police, emergency medical personnel or any other outside parties Description of injuries that occurred due to the incident Agency response and/or action Description of follow-up procedures taken to date and those planned for the future Signatures of the Agency Supervisor and/or Field Instructor and the student The Social Work Field Education Office will notify the student’s Faculty Field Liaison, Faculty Advisor, Program Chair, and Associate Dean. CRITERIA FOR THE SELECTION OF FIELD PRACTICUM SITES The Social Work Program is committed to providing our students with exposure to a wide variety of settings, client populations, and socially and culturally diverse communities. Agencies selected as Field Practicum sites must meet the following criteria: interest in and ability to provide field instruction for students enrolled in either the BSW or MSW programs; ability to provide field instruction that demonstrates a commitment to the mission of Wheelock College—to improve the lives of all children and families—conjoint with the Program’s commitment to justice-based social work practice, with an understanding of each program’s educational objectives; demonstrated interest in and commitment to the mission and goals of the Wheelock College Social Work Program, including a commitment to the curricular themes and Core Competencies of each program; willingness and capacity to provide qualified supervision and agency staff, specifically an MSW with two years of post-graduate experience and a license at the LCSW or LICSW level, or license-eligible for MSW Foundation Year Students, to function in the role of Field Instructor. This commitment includes allowance for appropriate time within the Field Instructor’s workload to sufficiently support the student’s learning (including orientation of the student to the setting; monitoring assignments; reviewing agency safety protocol; one hour of weekly face-to-face supervision; development of the student Learning Contract and mid-semester and semester-end evaluations of student performance; meetings with the Faculty Field Liaison; and attendance at the Field Instructor orientation and training seminars as provided by the College.); ability and capacity to provide within the agency appropriate, graduated learning in delivery of services, including individual, group, family, organization, and community 98 practice situations, which allow the student to function in a variety of social work roles, and an overall atmosphere for learning that will facilitate the achievement of educational objectives; capacity to plan in advance for the student and to use the student’s time in ways that will permit the achievement of the requisite educational and behavioral professional objectives; adherence to the NASW Code of Ethics in its policies and treatment of clients, students, and staff; and provision of a manual or written statement of agency policies, including policies related to issues of safety and management of crisis and emergency situations. CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF FIELD INSTRUCTORS Wheelock College believes that the Field Instructor is a critical component of the education of social work students. The functions of role model and agency teacher are central to the development and education of social work students during their practicum. In order to provide the best possible experience for students, the Field Instructor is required to: hold a Master of Social Work degree from a CSWE-accredited Social Work Program; possess competency as a practitioner with thorough knowledge of the field practice setting (a minimum of two years post-graduate experience, at least one year in the present setting is preferred); be licensed at the LCSW or LICSW level, or licensed eligible for MSW Foundation Year students; have an interest in and a willingness to function in the role of Field Instructor; be both knowledgeable about and supportive of the mission of Wheelock College and its Social Work Programs—to improve the lives of children and families—conjoint with the Program’s commitment to justice-based social work, with an understanding of each program’s educational objectives; possess personality traits that promote the development of a professional relationship with the student, including the ability to relate to the student in the roles of practitioner/supervisor/teacher; have an interest in and commitment to the mission and goals of the Wheelock College Social Work Programs (including a commitment to social work practice from a strengths perspective that is also family centered, community based, and interprofessional in nature); have an interest in and commitment to the development of high standards for both service delivery and social work education; have sufficient time provided by the agency to attend to the responsibilities entailed in the supervision of a practicum student (including orientation of the student to the setting; monitoring assignments; a minimum of one hour of weekly face to face supervision; development of student learning contract mid- semester and semester-end evaluation of student performance; meetings with the Faculty Field Liaison; and attendance at the Field Instructor orientation and training seminars as provided by the College); sign and return the Memorandum of Understanding which outlines the agreement between the agency, the Field Instructor, and the College provide the Director of Social Work Field Education with a current resume; 99 complete required student evaluation forms by scheduled dates outlined in the Field Practicum Calendar; and, at the completion of the student’s Field Practicum experience, complete an evaluation form of the Faculty Field Liaison. In some agencies, a licensed Field Instructor is not available. In these instances, a supervisor with the required credentials is supplied through use of a worker who is off-site. To augment this arrangement and to ensure ongoing support to the Field Practicum student, an Agency Supervisor is also identified for the student on site. The expectations of the Agency Supervisor, also referred to as the non-MSW supervisor, include (but are not limited to) the following: provide appropriate learning opportunities for the student and oversee his/her daily responsibilities; collaborate with the Field Instructor around the development of the learning contract and semester-end evaluations of the student, as well as providing feedback on related field documentation (e.g., client case records, process recordings); participate in a minimum of three scheduled meetings with their Faculty Field Liaison, Field Instructor, and student over the course of the academic year; and, attend scheduled orientation and training seminars as provided by the College. ROLES AND EXPECTATIONS OF FACULTY FIELD LIAISON For each student entering Field Practicum, a Faculty Field Liaison is assigned to provide support to the student, Field Instructor, and Agency Supervisor (if one is identified). In addition to the threeway conferences at the practicum site and the support phone calls (see below), the Faculty Field Liaison is accessible to the student and Field Instructor by telephone, e-mail, or to schedule additional meetings when the need arises. The expectations of the Faculty Field Liaison include (but are not limited to) the following: Provide support, advocacy, and mediation, as needed, to the student in relation to the practicum; Work collaboratively with the Field Instructor and Agency Supervisor regarding selection of assignments for students; Provide the Field Instructor with necessary information regarding students; Provide the Field Instructor with all necessary forms and information regarding the program and procedures; Meet a minimum of three times per academic year with each Field Instructor and student; Meet additionally with the Field Instructor and/or student if need arises; Make formal phone contact at least one time each semester with each Field Instructor; Remain in consistent contact with Social Work Field Education Office especially when there are concerns involving a student’s progress in the field Provide and/or attend orientation sessions and seminars for Field Instructors; Function as Instructor for the Field Seminar course that students take concurrent with Field Practicum; Assign a student grade (Pass/Fail) following collaboration with the Field Instructor; Submit all student-related field documentation (learning contract(s), semester-end evaluation forms) to the Director of Social Work Field Education at the end of each 100 semester; Write summary statements of each student’s placement information, learning contract, assignments, and performance at the end of each semester (to be submitted to the student, Faculty Advisor, Director of Social Work Field Education, and BSW and MSW Program Chairs); Assess the overall Field Practicum experience provided by the agency by completing an evaluation of the practicum site at the end of the academic year; and, The Faculty Field Liaison will meet on site with each Field Instructor and student three times per academic year to review the student’s progress towards achieving learning objectives and assignments identified in the learning contract. The Faculty Field Liaison will supplement site visits with at least one phone contact each semester. ROLES AND EXPECTATIONS OF THE FIELD EDUCATION OFFICE The Field Education Department is responsible for the field coordination and placement of all social work students who are eligible to begin field practicum. All students meet with the Field Education Staff to begin the field placement process. The responsibilities of the Field Education Office include (but are not limited to) the following: Develop and coordinate practicum sites which are in keeping with the mission of the Social Work Programs, and which are appropriate for BSW and/or MSW students. Maintain ongoing collaborative relationships with all practicum sites Work with students in order for suitable matching with the most appropriate field practicum sites. Provide training and orientation to the Field Instructors through scheduling and facilitating meetings on campus and/or in agency sites as conveniently as possible for all participants. Work closely with, support, and monitor the Faculty Field Liaisons. Meet with student, Faculty Field Liaison, Field Instructor, and other relevant team members (student Faculty Advisor, Program Chair, or other administrators) when there is a placement problem that cannot be resolved at the student-liaison-field instructor level. Organize and monitor the Field Seminar courses offered in the Social Work Program. Prepare the annual Field Practicum Calendar. Represent the College’s Social Work Programs in social work/school/agency collaborations in the community. Update and edit the Social Work Student Handbook and Field Practicum Manual and related forms. Collect and maintain all student-related field documentation and evaluations. Provide Field Instructors with feedback from students and Faculty Field Liaisons, related to supervision experiences. Collaborate with the Associate Dean, the Program Chairs of the BSW and MSW programs, and the social work faculty to develop new, and revise existing field-related policies and procedures. SUPPORT FOR FIELD INSTRUCTORS Orientation An orientation meeting is held on campus at the beginning of the academic year for new and returning Field Instructors and Faculty Field Liaisons. During this meeting the Social Work Field 101 Education Office gives a general introduction to the program and curricula. The expectations of practicum sites and Field Instructors are also clarified. Field Instructors receive a copy of the Social Work Field Education Manual; this is also sent electronically after the orientation. Social Work Faculty, Program Chairs, and the Associate Dean are present during the orientation in order to welcome the Field Instructors and provide specific curricular information. Field Instructor Trainings Wheelock College offers quarterly continuing education professional development opportunities for Field Instructors. In addition to Wheelock’s trainings, the Director of Social Work Field Education is a member of the New England Consortium of Graduate Social Work Field Education Directors (NECON) which is a consortium of New England social work schools and programs that collaborate on field related topics, concerns, and issues. Each year, a list of school-sponsored trainings and workshops is compiled for distribution to agencies and Field Instructors. Some meetings are held at agency sites during the year, while others are hosted by the sponsoring University or College. These trainings and workshops are available for all Field Instructors and can be found at www.neconsortium.com. Voucher Policy In appreciation for the learning experiences provided to our practicum students, Wheelock College issues one voucher per student who completes a 3, 4, 5, or 6 credit practicum. Supervising practitioners may use their voucher for any course or Institute taking place on campus or at other locations. Vouchers are sent directly to the supervising practitioner or site supervisor. If not used by the supervising practitioner, vouchers may be used by other site personnel; however, they may not be transferred to persons employed at any other site nor to a part or fulltime student who is matriculated at Wheelock College. Vouchers may only be used by persons able to demonstrate current employment at the practicum site to which the voucher was issued. The voucher must be signed by a member of the administrative staff to validate it for registration. Vouchers are valid for one calendar year immediately following the semester in which the Wheelock College student was placed at the practicum site. There are no extensions. No more than one voucher may be used per semester by any individual. Individuals not enrolled in a degree program may use vouchers for up to four undergraduate or two graduate courses. Non-matriculated graduate students may apply for the status of lifelong learner and continue to register for graduate courses. Vouchers may be used only once for one graduate or undergraduate course, regardless of the credits assigned to the course (1, 2 or 3 credits). Vouchers may not be used for field courses, practica or independent study. The voucher will be honored when presented for registration accompanied by a registration fee. Wheelock College reserves the right to cancel courses with insufficient enrollment. In the event of cancellation, course vouchers will be reissued to the practicum site for the following semester only. No other exceptions will be entertained. 102 A Bachelor’s degree is required for graduate registration. Persons using a voucher will be responsible for payment of a registration fee. The College is not able to extend vouchers or reissue lost ones. Vouchers should be treated as if they were a check and should be kept in a safe and retrievable spot. Field Instructors providing supervision over the summer are not eligible to receive a voucher. Registration policies, procedures, and class schedules are in the Course Offerings Brochure and the College Catalog or the Office of Academic Records and Registration at www.wheelock.edu/reg/index.asp. Please reference the Course Offering Book (COB) under “Registration” for additional information on the use of the vouchers. RESOURCE INFORMATION The Wheelock College Library and the Earl Center for Learning and Innovation support the student in both academic and practicum work settings with a wealth of theoretical and practical resources, which range from hammers and nails to a collection of 13,000 children's books and other academic resources. Field Instructors are welcome to use all of the library materials in-house. Library Resources The Wheelock College Library is located at 132 The Riverway. The library's many resources include: Over 85,000 books and bound journals and electronic resources in social work, early childhood education, elementary education, child development, special education/learning disabilities, testing and assessment, child care, and child life; 13,000 children's books (picture books, easy readers, science and math books); A wide variety of commercially produced curriculum materials, including texts, teacher guides, filmstrip/cassette units, phonograph records, tapes, film loops, multi-media kits, video tapes and computer software; Special interest bibliographies; Curriculum guides; ERIC microfiche collection (non-circulating); Computerized compact disc searching for articles in education and social sciences; Access to 55,000 titles online through subscription to five digital library collections of ebooks; and Full-text online access to thousands of journal titles through journal indexes and databases. The Library also offers passes to the Boston Children's Museum, the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, the Museum of Fine Arts, and the Museum of Science. Passes are available to current Wheelock students, faculty, and staff. The passes provide general admission only; they do not include admission to special exhibits, films, events, etc. All passes are first come, first served, and are available at the Service Desk on the first floor of the Library. For more information, contact the Service Desk at 617-879-2220 or circulation@wheelock.edu. Wheelock College Library hours may vary according to the academic year and when Wheelock is not in session. For information, please call 617-879-2220 or check the library website at: http://www.wheelock.edu/library/index.asp. The Earl Center for Learning and Innovation The purpose of the Earl Center for Learning and Innovation is to provide ideas and materials for working with children and adults in a variety of activities. Center staff is available to help students find what they need or show them how to use tools appropriate to be used in play and 103 therapy and other social work student/client interactions. Among the varied treasures to be discovered is equipment such as a do-it-yourself puppet theater, musical instruments, cooking utensils, and even some old-fashioned crank ice-cream freezers. A collection of free, recycled scrounge materials is available to students and their supervisors. In addition to these items— and many more—there is a file containing over 100 hand-out sheets on topics ranging from guinea pig care to water-play suggestions. ATTENDANCE POLICY Practicum students are expected to work as professionals, maintaining their agreed upon schedules at their field sites and fulfilling the minimum hours expected over the course of their practicum. This includes making up days at their field site that fall on agency holidays, when the agency is closed due to inclement weather, or in the event that the student is ill. It is the student’s responsibility to acquire the necessary contact information from her/his Field Instructor and Faculty Field Liaison in the event of an emergency. It is imperative that the student inform the Field Instructor and Faculty Field Liaison of any absence and discuss plans to make up each day that is missed. Students will not receive credit for the practicum unless the required minimum number of hours has been completed. SEMESTER BREAK AND WHEELOCK CALENDAR Practicum students will generally follow the Wheelock two-semester, academic calendar unless different arrangements have been stipulated and agreed to in advance of the start of the practicum. When an agency offering a two-semester practicum requires that students return to their setting prior to the resumption of the College’s semester, students need to understand that this schedule is a condition of their accepting placement with that site. Any other adjustment in schedule must be approved by the Faculty Field Liaison. SCHOOL OR SCHOOL-BASED PLACEMENT POLICY Students placed at schools or at agencies that follow a traditional school calendar should discuss start and end dates with their prospective placement site during the interview process. Some sites require students to be in the field during the months of May and June when the school year ends, irrespective of whether a student has met the required minimum hours of field work. In these situations, students should consult with the Social Work Field Education office to discuss whether enrollment in the Social Work Practicum and Summer Seminar is required. Students should also be mindful that since school and school-based placement calendars often do not align with the Wheelock College two-semester, academic calendar, they must work with their Faculty Field Liaison and Field Instructor around school vacations, snow days, and end dates. INCLEMENT WEATHER ADVISORY Although the following criteria apply to inclement weather and other emergencies on a week to week basis, students should keep in mind that they are still required to fulfill the minimum number of hours for Field Practicum for the academic year as prescribed by their program. If both the College and agency are closed, the student must make up the hours. If the agency closes but the college remains open, the student must make up the hours. If the College closes but the agency is open and the student needs to go in for client appointments or meetings, then the hours put in are considered towards the completion of the required total of Field Practicum hours. The College announces closings on local television and radio stations. During the agency orientation period, students are expected to find out from their Field Instructor how agency 104 closings will be announced -- radio, agency's telephone answering machine, supervisor calling the student at home, student calling Field Instructor at home, etc. FLEXIBLE FIELD OPTION The Social Work Program at Wheelock College is committed to providing support and flexibility to our students so that they have the greatest opportunity to be successful in achieving academic and professional goals. Being mindful that many of our students are not only undergraduate and graduate students but may also be juggling an array of professional and personal responsibilities, we work with the individual student, the Faculty Advisor, and the potential Field Practicum site to craft a program plan that best suits the student’s individual needs (e.g., extended/ “flex” field placement for MSW students). The student is still required to meet all the requirements of her/his educational program, including completing the minimum number of hours in the field, and to fulfill the expectations of the practicum site. While there is no formal Flexible Field Option in the BSW Program, the effort is made to address student needs for flexibility on an individual basis. Any program adjustments are determined by the Director of Social Work Field Education in consultation with the BSW Chair and Associate Dean. MSW students utilizing the Flexible Field Option must propose and complete the Flex-Field Option Agreement during the field placement process. A copy of this form is located in the Field Forms section of the Manual. Foundation Year MSW students utilizing the Flexible Field Option are required to be in field a minimum of 12 hours a week. Concentration Year MSW students utilizing the Flexible Field Option are required to be in field a minimum of 16 hours a week. Final semester Concentration Year students who have not completed their hours in field by the time grades close will receive an “R” in Social Work Field Practicum & Seminar, indicating that they are in the process of completing their hours (see section below). The Registrar’s office can provide necessary degree completion documentation for employment purposes. Once final grades have been entered, students will receive their official diploma in August. TERMS FOR “R” GRADE APPLICATION An “R” grade is given for the field practicum and field seminar when a student is in satisfactory standing in the practicum, but requires additional time beyond the close of the second semester to complete the required hours. The following scenarios explain when “R” grades are and are not applied: Up to 1 week of hours remaining (no “R” grade; grade of Pass given) With permission from the field placement site and approval from the Director of Field and Program Chair, graduating students may complete up to one week of field hours after grades are due (BSW students 16 hours, MSW Foundation Year students 16 hours, MSW Concentration Year students 24 hours). Students must be in good academic and professional standing. The student must have demonstrated a pattern of reliable communication, timeliness with assignments, and good attendance at the field practicum and seminar. Students must turn in all field assignments, except for the final timesheet, by the class deadline set by the Faculty Field Liaison, typically the last seminar class or the following week. If the student does not complete the remaining field hours and submit the signed time sheet by an assigned deadline, the Faculty Field Liaison will submit a change of grade form that will 105 change the Pass to a Fail. Less than 30 hours remaining as of May 31 (“R” grade given) With permission from the field placement site students may complete less than 30 hours in June. Students must have completed all process recording by the last seminar class. Students do not have to enroll in the summer seminar course. Students do not have to pay for additional credits. Students will receive an R grade that will be changed to a Pass when the hours are complete and the final time sheet is received by the designated deadline. The Faculty Field Liaison should plan to do the final site visit for continuity and if that is not possible, a member of the Social Work Field Education Office will conduct the final site visit. Graduating students will be eligible to have their degrees conferred in August. Once the grade has been changed to a Pass, a graduating student may request a letter from the registrar confirming that he or she has completed all of the requirements for his or her degree. Senior BSW students may walk at graduation if 8 credits or less are remaining Concentration year MSW students may walk at graduation if 8 credits or less are remaining 30 hours or more remaining (“R” grade given) Students who have 30 hours or more remaining at the beginning of June, and are not in a school based placement that requires a commitment to the full academic school (nonWheelock) year must enroll in the summer seminar by June 1 and pay for the 2-credit course. Students will receive an R grade at the end of the spring semester that will be changed to a Pass grade upon successful completion of the requirements for the summer field practicum and seminar. Graduating students will be eligible to have their degrees conferred in August or December. Once the grade has been changed to a Pass, a graduating student may request a letter from the registrar confirming that he or she has completed all of the requirements for his or her degree. Senior BSW students may walk at graduation if 8 credits or less are remaining Concentration year MSW students may walk at graduation if 8 credits or less are remaining SUMMER SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE SEMINAR POLICY MSW students who are in their field placement for 30 hours or more a month during the individual months of June, July, or August are required to enroll in the Social Work Field Practicum and Summer Seminar. If extenuating circumstances require BSW students to extend their hours during the summer months, they may also be required to enroll in the Social Work Field Practicum and Summer Seminar with permission from the BSW Chair and Director of Social Work Field Education. STUDENT PRACTICUM AT PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT Students who are interested in doing their practicum at their place of employment should discuss the logistics of this during the field placement process. If a student is employed in an agency where the practicum takes place, the Social Work Field Education Office works with the student to assure that the following criteria are met prior to approving the field site: 106 the site must be large enough to provide work for the student that is in a different part of the agency than where the student is employed (e.g., a student in a child welfare office who does investigations could be assigned to adoption work); the MSW Field Instructor must be a different supervisor from the supervisor overseeing the work the student is employed to do; the student and the agency must assure the Social Work Field Education Office that the student has release time from his/her employment to perform the practicum hours, have supervision and take the field seminar; the student’s practicum experience in the agency where she/he works meets the same criteria as students who are not employed at the practicum site; and, if these criteria are met, the Social Work Field Education Office makes a decision as to whether to approve the student practicum in his or her agency of employment. The College assumes no responsibility for providing insurance for students against harm suffered or for liability incurred as a result of employment outside of an academically approved placement. Such insurance and any liability resulting from such employment are the responsibility of the student and the employer. The program reserves the right to change a student’s placement in an academically approved placement if, in the College’s opinion and at its sole discretion, it determines that a student’s outside employment at a placement site interferes with or compromises the educational goals of the academically approved placement. The College provides a copy of this policy and a ‘Student Internship at Employment Form’ to be completed by the student and employing agency. A copy of this form is located in the Field Forms section of the Manual. Students seeking employment at a placement site outside the scope of an academically approved placement are responsible for obtaining a signed acknowledgment and release form from the placement site. COMPENSATION AT PLACEMENT SITES Wheelock College conducts its practicum, internships, field placements, and other off- campus learning programs in academically approved placements. It is rare for stipends to be given to students completing their practicum. On occasion, practicum sites will compensate students to perform work outside of an academically approved placement and beyond the College's oversight or control. Wheelock College expresses no opinion and makes no representation, either explicit or implicit, that a placement site is a safe and adequately supervised work environment outside of an academically approved placement. Moreover, the College expresses no opinion and makes no representation, either explicit or implicit, that a student is qualified to perform work at a placement site outside of an academically approved placement. THE LEARNING CONTRACT The Learning Contract is a document developed collaboratively by the student, Field Instructor, and Faculty Field Liaison to guide the student’s learning experiences during the practicum in relation to the CSWE’s Core Competencies and Practice Behaviors. In the BSW Program, a new Learning Contract is created at the beginning of each semester. In the MSW program, it is created once, at the beginning of the practice experience and is modified as needed. The Learning Contract form is located in the Field Forms section of the Manual. The outline for the Learning Contract is intended to be used as a guide in this process prior to completing the learning contract. It is most productive if both student and Field Instructor review and think about it before the first site visit by the Faculty Field Liaison—the student on the basis of self-perception and the Field Instructor on the basis of observation and knowledge of the student's entry into the agency, experience in the field thus far, and identified opportunities for learning at the site. The process is intended to put the student clearly in the role of adult learner and sets the pattern for self-evaluation and responsibility for one's own professional growth over time. It also helps the Field Instructor to individualize the 107 selection of assignments and methods of teaching. In the development of the Learning Contract, the following should be considered while identifying learning activities and responsibilities: 108 1. Situational & Contextual Factors—for student and at the site Health, work/school load, stressors, etc., if relevant to student role and experience. 2. Cognitive Skills Reading skills, study habits, etc., as pertinent to practice. Knowledge base, use of deductive and inductive reasoning (as seen in informal and conference discussions, records, psychosocial case assessments, group process assessments, etc.). Critical appraisal of theory. Integration of theory with practice. Transfer of learning from one situation to another. Formulation of professional goals and objectives for case, group, or self. Conceptualization and execution of appropriate intervention(s). 3. Affective Skills Capacity to perceive, explore, and intervene appropriately in relation to one’s own and clients' feelings. Awareness of subjective reactions and development of professional insight and selfregulation. Capacity to maintain positive and non-judgmental relationships with clients and colleagues. Genuineness and authenticity in relationship to self and others. 4. Systems/Organizational & Relational Skills Professional appearance and social/professional behavior that is related to the context/setting. Broad and variable communication skills. Capacity to orient to client need rather than student need. Openness to feedback and dialogue with Field Instructor. Capacity for appropriate dialogue and sharing with staff and other colleagues. Capacity for exchange of information and ideas with others. Capacity for collaboration combined with assertiveness. Acquisition of knowledge and skill in assessing agency and community systems. Utilization of formal and informal systems within the agency and community. 5. Professional Development Demonstrated investment in learning and execution of tasks and assignments. Focus on subject of interest, whether on client, peers, or own education. Knowledge of learning style, patterns, and needs. Awareness of biases, stereotypes, and prejudices. Use of assistance from others (Field Instructor, peers, etc.) Assumption of responsibility related to work habits, participation in design of learning experiences, provision of services, self-motivation in learning. Open attitude toward suggestions or criticism. Understanding of context and scope of problems, whether specific or general. Identification with social work goals, values and ethics. Organization of professional priorities and tasks. Planning Tasks & Assignments Please refer to the Learning Contract form provided. 6. PRACTICUM ASSIGNMENTS USE OF CASE MATERIALS IN CLASS It is useful to discuss actual case experiences in the classroom giving students the opportunity to apply theory to actual practice situations. Furthermore, assignments for the class will be based on the practicum. However, confidentiality must be preserved and, accordingly, the following guidelines will be used: Delete or change all client names; Change all identifying information; Do not use highly confidential or incriminating information; Do not retain case records or case recordings; Review all materials with Field Instructor prior to submission; and, Obtain client permission to use any tape or video recording that cannot be adequately disguised. Students must talk with the Field Instructor about an agency's policies and guidelines. While case materials will be discussed in class utilizing the above guidelines, it is unethical for students to discuss any case material with friends, family, etc. PROCESS RECORDINGS BSW and MSW students are required to complete a minimum of one (1) process recording per week, submitting a minimum of seven (7) per semester to their Faculty Field Liaison. The process recordings are first submitted to the Field Instructor for review and feedback and then used as a basis for supervision. The reviewed process recordings are then submitted to the Faculty Field Liaison at the next bi-weekly seminar course. Field Instructors may require students to complete more than the minimum number of process recordings. Please refer to the section on Field Practicum Policies and Forms for a fuller explanation of process recordings and a sample form. These forms may be reproduced as needed. ASSIGNMENTS WITH A) GROUPS AND B) LARGER SYSTEMS Over the course of the year it is expected that students have field assignments related to work with groups and larger systems. These assignments must be listed in either the first and/or second semester Practicum Learning Contract. The student needs to submit written material on work with groups and larger systems assignments, as with individual cases. Please refer to the BSW & MSW Foundation Year Field Practicum & Seminar syllabus for more information. A) GROUP WORK ASSIGNMENTS The student should be given an opportunity to create, plan, lead or co-lead a group of clients. If this is not possible, an opportunity to observe a group for an extended period of time may be 109 substituted. Arrangements may be made by the Field Instructor with another agency, preferably one serving a similar client population, if no group experience is available in the placement agency. Three possible scenarios for a group experience are as follows: Lauri's agency does not do group counseling of any kind. Her supervisor makes arrangements with a family service agency nearby which runs family life education groups for first-time parents. Although Lauri is not allowed to co-lead the group, she is permitted to observe the group for eight weeks, to examine the written discussion materials used, and to talk to the leader briefly after each meeting. Beth's agency does not offer any group experiences for her. Her supervisor has recently referred one of her own cases to a support group for multiple sclerosis patients--a group affiliated with a local hospital. Permission is secured for Beth to attend these meetings as an observer and recorder. Scott’s agency does not provide treatment or educational groups. However, there are staff meetings. After attending the second staff meeting, Scott wrote a group process recording using the format provided in this manual. His impressions were discussed with the Field Instructor. B) ASSIGNMENTS WITH PRACTICE IN LARGER SYSTEMS Larger systems practice is defined as any intervention that attempts to influence on organizational, community, political, and/or judicial levels with the goal of benefiting groups of clients or the general public. Referring a client to a community agency or collaborating with another agency on a particular client is not considered a larger systems practice assignment; these activities are part of ongoing work with groups and individuals. Larger systems practice includes locality (e.g., neighborhood) development, social planning, social action, staff education, social administration, class advocacy, resource development and coordination and networking on a community level. The student may engage in educating, and persuading in order to bring about change in the organization or community, but no adversarial strategies should be used without the explicit permission of the Field Instructor. The assignment may be "one shot" activities, such as attending a board meeting to see how decisions are made or, the assignments may involve more extended contacts with other professionals, lay groups, legislators, etc. In all cases, the experience must be written up and followed by discussion with the Field Instructor. The assignment may be done the following ways: A. Direct attempt at intervention a) Student plays primary role b) Student plays subsidiary role B. Indirect involvement a) Student observes larger systems practice in action b) Student interviews a practitioner who has done macro practice (Categories A and B are not mutually exclusive.) 110 The assignment may be the result of special arrangements made by the Field Instructor with another agency, again preferably an agency serving a similar client population. The Field Instructor should inform the Faculty Field Liaison as soon as possible if there are problems in providing these larger system practice opportunities. EXAMPLES OF ASSIGNMENTS WITH LARGER SYSTEMS An assignment in monitoring legislation and informing co-workers: The student picks one issue or a bill that would impact one of the client populations served by the practicum site and monitors state legislative actions. (One easy way for students to be on top of legislative priorities and developments is to visit NASW Massachusetts Chapter’s website: www.naswma.org.) The student then shares his/her findings, either verbally or in writing, with agency staff and/or interns. This can be done either once or multiple times throughout the semester. An outline of the presentation is given to the Field Instructor, followed by discussion of the presentation afterwards in supervision. It should be possible for students to carry this assignment in all kinds of settings. An assignment in networking: Maggie is placed in a shelter for women who have experienced domestic violence. Her agency is invited to participate in a fair called "Services for Women" to be held in a local shopping mall. Maggie's supervisor asks Maggie to help set up the agency's display and to spend two hours at the booth, where she would discuss the services provided with visitors and staff from other agencies. After she finishes her shift, she talks informally to staff in other agencies, thus discovering commonalties of interest and concern. After this experience, Maggie and her supervisor discuss new ways to work together with other agencies serving women. Maggie writes a summary of this experience. An assignment in resource development: Jodie is placed in an agency serving children who are developmentally delayed. Through contacts with parents, she becomes aware of the need for baby-sitters trained to take care of mildly and moderately developmentally delayed children. Her supervisor asks her to check out agencies in town that may provide such training. Jodie is also encouraged to talk to the principal in the high school to see if students may be interested in being trained. Jodie keeps a log of these contacts. As a further assignment, the supervisor asks Jodie to write up an outline of what such training may involve. Assignments in intra-agency change: Diane is placed in an elementary school. It has a policy of discouraging parents from calling the teachers before/after school and from visiting the classroom. Diane and her supervisor agree that this policy has become a sore point for both parents and teachers. Diane's assignment consists of talking to the principal about the rationale and history of this policy and then assessing the climate within the school for change. Diane is also asked to write a brief proposal for changing this policy. John is placed in a mental health agency. He becomes aware that paraprofessional workers are not invited to attend staff meetings nor are they given a one-hour lunch break. The supervisor puts John in touch with the agency's Personnel Committee. John attends a couple of their meetings before bringing up his question about the paraprofessional workers being treated differently. The Personnel Committee asks him to submit a written proposal. 111 Assignments in advocacy: Matt is placed in an agency serving clients who are developmentally disabled. He has heard many complaints from clients about problems with their S.S.I. payments. When the watchdog agency, Council on Developmental Disabilities, announces a public meeting to hear concerns from people who are developmentally disabled, the supervisor asks Matt to contact each client who has complained, encourage him/her to attend the meeting and offer to arrange for transportation or accompany him/her. Regardless of how many of her clients would actually attend the meeting, Matt plans to attend it and to voice their concerns. Stella's agency does not provide much opportunity for advocacy, but the supervisor has recently worked with the State Nursing Home Ombudsman Program on a case involving an elderly client. The supervisor arranges for Stella to spend two hours every two weeks at the Ombudsman Program, taking calls and accompanying the Ombudsman on some nursing home visits. The Ombudsman Program agrees to this arrangement for six weeks only. Stella keeps a log of her work. An assignment in administrative decision-making process: Maria's agency, a residential children's institution, does not permit any student worker to attend board meetings. Maria's supervisor, however, sits on the board of another agency which serves children who are emotionally disturbed. She asks Maria to attend one board meeting that is of particular interest—deciding whether to drop a pilot program started a year ago. Maria takes notes during the meeting. During supervision, she and her supervisor discuss the composition of the board, the functions, the power structure and the decision-making process. An assignment in community relations: Thomas is placed in a school for the deaf. The school has a Community Relations Department that sends out literature to interested citizens, arranges for speakers to lay and professional groups and organizes tours of the school. Thomas’ supervisor makes arrangements for Thomas to work in the Community Relations Department one morning a week for two months. He has kept a log of what he does. At the end of the two months, Thomas discusses with his supervisor his impressions of the agency's relationship with the community at large and of ways to improve the operations of the Community Relations Department. Assignments in legislative advocacy: Lisa's supervisor at Traveler's Aid Society is asked to testify in a state legislative hearing concerning the plight of the homeless. Lisa helps her supervisor put together material for the presentation then goes along to the state house to observe the hearing. This experience is written up and discussed. Lisa is also asked to follow up on what action is taken by the state to help the homeless. Dorothy is placed in a residential treatment center. She is asked by her supervisor to participate in the lobbying effort for an adoption bill that would allow a licensed adoption agency to release non-identifying information from the adoption record to adoptive parents, birth parents, and adoptees, eighteen years or older. After studying some written background materials, Dorothy interviews a staff member in the agency about the rationale for the bill and how its passage would benefit the children and adults being served by the agency. Dorothy then writes a letter to a house representative, supporting the bill. 112 OUTLINE OF SUGGESTED PRACTICUM ACTIVITIES IN THE FIRST SEMESTER: BSW STUDENTS AND MSW FOUNDATION YEAR STUDENTS The Program uses a variety of human services settings as practicum sites, both direct services agencies and indirect service organizations. No single outline of practicum activities can apply to all practicum sites. The following outline is meant as a guideline for structuring student field experiences. Individual consultation regarding practicum contract and assignments will be available to every Field Instructor through the assistance of the Faculty Field Liaison. The first semester should focus on establishment of professional relationships, engagement, data gathering, assessment, planning, and contracting. Consequently, cases and projects should be assigned to students as quickly as possible. Weeks 1 – 2 Purpose: Orientation to agency and social work role Learn about the basics: information about parking, telephone usage, agency hours, appropriate dress, snow day, policy and procedure, etc. Read agency literature such as annual reports, grant proposals. Review an organizational chart of agency and list of agency personnel and their functions. Discuss agency clerical and record-keeping procedures. Discuss confidentiality policy of agency. Discuss pertinent personnel policies, e.g., travel reimbursement, professional attire. Discuss safety precautions in and out of agency. Discuss pertinent administrative procedures. Meet with staff to learn about their specific duties. Attend staff meetings and/or case conferences. Become acquainted with community in which agency and clients are located. Visit other agencies and service delivery systems. Discuss common fears about beginning. Discuss structure for use of supervision. Read research articles about the clients served by the practicum site and relevant fields of practice. Assess student's learning needs, strengths and weaknesses. Develop a Field Practicum Learning Contract, listing objectives, assignments, supervision plans and evaluation plans. Weeks 3 – 5 Purpose: Preparation for establishing relationships with client systems 113 Assign first case, group, or project. Review records of assigned cases or groups. Observe interviews or group sessions done by Field Instructor or other staff. Make appropriate initial contacts with client systems. Begin initial interviews or group sessions. Obtain Field Instructor feedback. Weeks 6 – 7 Purpose: Learning about problem definition, data collection and assessment Observe other social workers doing a social history. Read Field Instructor’s or other workers' assessment of an individual client, or a family, or a group, an organization, or a community. Write an assessment of a client system. Participate in case conferences or team meetings. Participate in mid-term evaluation of own performance. Weeks 8 – 10 Purpose: Learning about planning, goal setting and contract making Assume ongoing responsibility for a client system with focus on problem definition, planning, goal setting, and contract making. Continue to participate in case conferences or team meetings. Weeks 11 – 15 Purpose: Learning about a variety of social work intervention roles and different kinds of writing; end-of-semester evaluation Continue ongoing responsibility for one or more client systems. Utilize a variety of social work roles (advocate, broker, educator, enabler and mediator). Learn to write internal memos, referral letters, and referral summaries, requests for information from other agencies, etc. or similar narrative for review by Field Instructor. Write a self-evaluation of performance in the practicum. Review jointly with Field Instructor final evaluation and discuss learning objectives for the second semester. OUTLINE OF SUGGESTED PRACTICUM ACTIVITIES IN THE SECOND SEMESTER: BSW STUDENTS AND MSW FOUNDATION YEAR STUDENTS In the second semester, the student is expected to demonstrate continued growth in the skills attained in the first semester of the practicum. If the student had not been working with client systems larger than individuals and families in the first semester, opportunities should be provided in the second semester to allow students to learn about group work and larger systems practice. Weeks 1 – 15: 114 Create, plan, lead or co-lead a treatment or task group. Observe a treatment or task (i.e. staff meeting) group at least three times and evaluate its effectiveness. Interview the group leader after observing the group. Make presentations in case conferences or team meetings. Discuss and critique agency policies and their implementation. Learn directly or indirectly about macro practice (e.g., serve as agency representative to a coalition in the community, accompany Field Instructor who gives expert testimony at a legislative hearing, prepare a proposal to change an agency policy or improve an agency procedure). Discuss diversity issues in intervention in generalist social work practice. Discuss ethical dilemmas encountered in the field placement. Design a plan to evaluate an agency program or progress made by client systems. Prepare for termination with client systems. Write transfer or closing summaries. Write self-evaluation of performance in the practicum. Review jointly with Field Instructor the final evaluation and identify lifelong professional development objectives for the student. Terminate with client systems. Terminate with colleagues in the agency. Give feedback to Field Instructor about the placement experience OUTLINE OF SUGGESTED PRACTICUM ACTIVITIES IN THE FIRST SEMESTER: CONCENTRATION YEAR MSW STUDENTS The Program uses a variety of human services settings as practicum sites, both direct services agencies and indirect service organizations. No single outline of practicum activities can apply to all practicum sites. The following outline is meant as a guideline for structuring student field experiences. Individual consultation regarding practicum contract and assignments will be available to every Field Instructor through the assistance of the Faculty Field Liaison. Weeks 1 – 2 Learn about agency basics: information about parking, telephone usage, agency hours, appropriate dress, snow day, policy and procedure, etc. Read agency literature such as annual reports, grant proposals. Review an organizational chart of agency and list of agency personnel and their functions. Discuss agency clerical and record-keeping procedures. Discuss confidentiality policy of agency. Discuss pertinent personnel policies, e.g., travel reimbursement, professional attire. Discuss safety precautions in and out of agency. Discuss pertinent administrative procedures. Meet with staff to learn about their specific duties. Attend staff meetings and/or case conferences. Become acquainted with community in which agency and clients are located. Visit other agencies and service delivery systems. Read research articles about the clients served by the practicum site and relevant fields of practice. Read Field Instructor’s or other workers' assessment of an individual client, or a family, or a group, an organization, or a community Discuss hopes and fears about new placement setting. Discuss student’s previous practicum experience including areas of identified strength, continued growth and learning needs. Discuss supervision expectations and preferences. Discuss and plan for how differences and challenges in the supervisory relationship will be managed. Review and discuss Wheelock-specific Advanced Practice Behaviors in the agency setting. 115 Discuss additional classes student is enrolled in; have student provide copy of syllabi. Observe interviews or group sessions done by Field Instructor or other staff Develop Field Practicum Learning Contract Weeks 3 – 15 Assign cases, groups, or projects. Review records of assigned cases or groups. Make appropriate initial contacts with client systems. Begin initial interviews or group sessions. Write an assessment of a client system and review with Field Instructor Actively participate in case conferences or team meetings. Discuss ethical dilemmas encountered in the field placement. Design a plan to evaluate an agency program or progress made by client systems. Identify opportunities to progressively take a leadership stance in agency setting. Make presentations and/or facilitate a case conference or team meeting. Identify and analyze social policy related to agency. If applicable, discuss Integrative Human Rights Action Project. Ongoing discussions about student performance evaluation and learning Review and complete Semester End evaluation and identify learning goals for second semester OUTLINE OF PRACTICUM ACTIVITIES IN THE SECOND SEMESTER: CONCENTRATION YEAR MSW STUDENTS Weeks 1 - 15 Discuss classes student is newly enrolled in; have student provide copy of syllabi. Review Semester End evaluation and discuss already identified learning goals for second semester Assume increased responsibility for client systems with focus on problem definition, planning, goal setting, and contract making. Ongoing discussions about student performance evaluation. Discuss and analyze organizational leadership, fundraising and community asset building related to agency setting. Prepare for termination with client systems. Make presentations and/or facilitate a case conference or team meeting. Discuss student strengths, interests and areas for continued growth as related to job search and lifelong professional development. Discuss how internships skill sets can translate to other social work settings. If applicable, present Integrative Human Rights Action Project in agency setting. Prepare for termination with client systems. Terminate with client systems. Terminate with colleagues in the agency. Review and complete Semester End evaluation. Give feedback to Field Instructor about the placement experience. 116 PROCESS FOR DISRUPTIONS IN THE FIELD PRACTICUM A change in field practicum is not encouraged and should only be undertaken after serious reflection and with the student’s understanding that the decision to change may delay or even extend a student’s time in the program. This is due to the fact that it is difficult to identify a new practicum after the academic year has begun and/or the student may need additional time to prepare to be successful in the field. In instances where it is determined that a match between a student and placement site is not compatible, when the placement seems inappropriate, or when the site identifies concerns that could result in termination of a student’s placement, the following sequential steps are taken: 1. After addressing the issues initially with the Field Instructor, the student notifies the Faculty Field Liaison of concerns, and the two parties discuss options and ideas. The student may also discuss the situation with the Faculty Advisor for support. 2. The student continues to work with the Field Instructor in order to address concerns and problems and to explore resolutions. 3. The Faculty Field Liaison alerts the Social Work Field Education Office to the concerns and discusses any past problems and steps attempted towards resolution. The Faculty Advisor may be brought into the process at any time. 4. If the issues persist, the student, the Faculty Field Liaison, and the Field Instructor meet together in an attempt to create the best possible learning environment, and to address concerns of all parties. 5. When possible, the outcome of the aforementioned meeting will be one of consensus. If the concerns have progressed to a point beyond resolution, the Faculty Field Liaison and student will inform the Field Instructor and practicum site and arrange for a termination timetable. 6. The Faculty Field Liaison works closely with the Social Work Field Education Office during this process to ensure a satisfactory outcome for all involved. 7. During this time, the Social Work Field Education Office may also contact the student’s other course instructors to learn if concerns with the student’s performance have been noted in the classroom. 8. If a student is asked to leave or chooses to leave the field placement, the information related to the departure will be shared with the Faculty Field Liaison, Faculty Advisor, and may be shared with future potential field placement sites. The student, Field Instructor, and Faculty Field Liaison complete a “Perception of Disrupted Placement” form. 9. After gathering feedback from all parties involved in the disrupted placement, a Field Readiness Agreement may be prepared for the student; in instances where an Agreement is implemented, the student will adhere to all steps outlined in the Agreement in order to receive clearance to re-enter Field; 10. Once cleared to re-enter Field, the Social Work Field Education Office, in conjunction with the student, begins to identify and secure a new placement. 11. The Social Work Field Education Office sends appropriate materials to the new site. 12. The student remains in close contact with the Social Work Field Education Office, Faculty Field Liaison, and Faculty Advisor for continued support during this placement transition process. In instances where a student is not able to meet the demands of the practicum, the sequential steps to be taken are as follows: 1. The Faculty Field Liaison, informed by the Field Instructor, discusses concerns with 117 the student, outlines areas of concern, and sends a formal written academic progress reports, or Compass, with specific goals and a timeline for improvements. 2. If improvement does not occur, the Faculty Field Liaison alerts the Social Work Field Education Office and the Faculty Advisor of the need for a course of action to be established and specific responsibilities to be assigned. The Program Chair is also alerted of the concerns. 3. The student’s situation is discussed among the student, the Social Work Field Education Office, Faculty Field Liaison, and Faculty Advisor, considering options and determining a course of action (e.g., new placement, taking a leave of absence, being counseled out of the program, etc.) 4. If a new placement is decided upon, procedures 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 as outlined above will be followed. The Social Work Field Education Office may request consultation from the BSW or MSW Program Chair or the Associate Dean at any point in the abovementioned process. WITHDRAWAL FROM PRACTICUM Voluntary Withdrawal from Field Practicum A student whose performance is substantively compromised due to health issues must submit documentation confirming that his or her health issues exist such that either a voluntary withdrawal is necessary or explaining how the student may fulfill the requirements of the practicum with reasonable accommodations. To request withdrawal from a practicum due to health issues, a student must submit: a written petition describing the health issues; a written statement from the student’s Field Instructor stating that the student was performing satisfactorily at the time of withdrawal; and, a written statement from a medical and/or mental health professional describing the student’s health issues and explaining the reason(s) for the student’s inability to satisfy all the requirements of the practicum. A set of these documents must be submitted to the Director of Social Work Field Education, the BSW or MSW Program Chair, and another to the Scholastic Review Board—SRB (for BSW students) and the Graduate Review Board—GRB (for MSW students), along with the “Withdrawal from Practicum” form available on MyWheelock under the Student tab. The SRB and GRB make the final determination as to whether a voluntary withdrawal will be granted for health reasons. In situations where this is not granted and/or the withdrawal takes place after the College withdrawal deadline set for each semester, the student remains responsible for the tuition covering the practicum. A student who withdraws from a practicum at any time during a semester for reasons other than documented health issues approved by the SRB or GRB will automatically receive a failing grade of F. A student who has interrupted his/her successful completion of a Field Practicum due to extreme circumstances, must work closely with his/her Faculty Field Liaison, the Social Work Field Education Office, and the student’s Faculty Advisor to craft a plan for withdrawal, Field Readiness Agreement, if applicable, or alternative completion of the placement. In consultation with the 118 appropriate Program Chair (undergraduate or graduate) and the Associate Dean, the student will work diligently to seek an agreeable solution to meet the student’s needs, agency expectations, and program requirements. REINSTATEMENT IN A PRACTICUM A student who has requested a voluntary withdrawal for health reasons or has failed a practicum must request reinstatement before entering another practicum by taking the following steps: BSW Students complete a “Request for Continuance in a Practicum” form available on MyWheelock. submit documentation from a medical or mental health professional to support his or her reinstatement in a practicum; and, submit the completed form and all supporting documentation to the Scholastic Review Board by October 1, if the student wishes to enter a practicum in the next succeeding spring semester, and by March 15, if the student wishes to enter a practicum in the next succeeding fall semester. Requests for reinstatement are initially screened by the Scholastic Review Board and the Dean of the School. MSW Students complete a “Request for Continuance in a Practicum” form available on MyWheelock, submit documentation to support his or her reinstatement in a practicum; and, submit the completed form and all supporting documentation to the Graduate Review Board at least one semester prior to the beginning of the semester that the student wishes to be reinstated in a practicum. Requests for reinstatement are initially screened by the Graduate Review Board and the Dean of the School. In some cases, students in either the BSW or MSW Program will be asked to submit additional evidence (e.g., documentation related to additional human service work completed during the time away from school, a letter of recommendation from a supervisor of this work, letters for support of readmission, and a letter from the student him/herself, etc.) before they will be allowed to participate in another practicum. A student who voluntarily withdraws from a practicum due to health issues must complete the above steps and also submit documentation that her/his health issues have been resolved, or explain how s/he may fulfill the requirements of the practicum with reasonable accommodations. Incomplete Grade Status Students may not receive incomplete grades in any courses the semester prior to entering or continuing on in a practicum. Any exception to this policy must be approved by the Scholastic Review Board or the Graduate Review Board. All incomplete grades must be formally resolved and the grade change submitted by the instructor to the Registrar’s Office before return to practicum will be permitted. Standards of Conduct The unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession or use of controlled substances, illicit drugs or alcohol by students on College property or as part of any College-sponsored activity, including field placement activity, is prohibited. A full statement of standards of conduct, disciplinary sanctions, and the appeals process as stated in the Wheelock College Student Handbook 119 is included in Section I: Introduction to Wheelock College. Behaviors Requiring Immediate Termination from Placement Some behaviors are so grievous that they will result in immediate termination from a placement. These include, but are not limited to: inflicting or threatening to inflict injury to a client, agency staff member, or any other person related to performance of professional duties; abusing a controlled substance or alcohol so that it affects performance; becoming sexually involved with clients; and engaging in illegal behaviors which reflect upon the student’s ability to perform professionally or which reflect negatively upon the profession. There may be other behaviors that will result in termination from placement or in other types of penalties. Disciplinary Sanctions The College will impose disciplinary sanctions on students who violate the Standards of Conduct set forth in this policy. Violations of the Standards of Conduct may result in disciplinary action up to and including dismissal and referral for prosecution. Penalties for the violation of local, state and federal laws pertaining to illicit drugs and alcohol are set forth in the Policy and include imprisonment and/or fines. Disciplinary sanctions which may be imposed on students include, but are not limited to, written warning, confiscating of the alcohol or drugs, referral to the relevant student Review Board, mediation, disciplinary notice, termination of privileges, disciplinary probation, suspension, expulsion and referral for prosecution. As an alternative to imposing any given lever of discipline, the College may provide a student with one or more of the following alternatives: 1) completion of an appropriate rehabilitation program, 2) restitution, or 3) acceptance of mutually agreed upon conditions for continuation of the privilege to attend the College. In addition to these sanctions, those students who violate the Wheelock College Drug and Alcohol Awareness policy may be required to attend counseling and/or evaluation sessions. For information on the counseling and treatment services available, please refer to the Wheelock College Student Handbook. Appeals Process Students may appeal the grading by the Faculty Field Liaison by following the College’s appeal process as outlined in the Wheelock College Student Handbook. Follow-Up If it is determined that a student cannot continue in the Social Work Program, the following support services can be utilized: Assistance of the Office of Academic Advising to consider alternative educational plans at Wheelock for undergraduate students; Assistance of college career planning staff to assist student in determining appropriate career goals; and Referral for counseling services for assistance in resolving emotional or other issues. PROTOCOL FOR ADDRESSING PRACTICUM ETHICAL PROBLEMS Wheelock College has as one of its main goals the development of an educated person and professional. The Social Work Program faculty commits itself to educating and developing professionals dedicated to improving the quality of life for children, adults, families, organizations, and communities and to helping advance social justice. The programs infuse their curricula with content, values, and ethics that guide professional social workers, students, and independent practitioners. Such a commitment and the infusion of values and ethics into the social work 120 practicum experience require a procedure for handling agency ethical problems that may occur. This procedure requires that students be aware that social workers have a commitment to making institutions more humane and responsive to human needs. The Social Work Program, consistent with NASW’s ethical code, trains its students to accept the responsibility for clarifying values and resolving ethical dilemmas. In the course of the practicum, students may come across ethical dilemmas that are client focused and should be addressed in the context of supervision. They may also encounter ethical dilemmas that relate to agency policy and practice or staff behavior. In these situations, students need to know that placement agencies can respond to agency-based ethical problems in a variety of ways. Regardless of the source of the dilemma, students should keep in mind that the “values, principles, and standards in the NASW Code are relevant to any situation in which ethical judgment is warranted.” As students grapple with all ethical problems and dilemmas, the Social Work Program expects them to function “within the structure of the organization and service delivery systems and, under supervision to seek necessary organizational change,” if required, to address the presenting ethical problem. This level of ethical responsibility of social work interns is supported by the NASW Code of Ethics, which requires social workers to consider its Code of Ethics as their primary source of ethical information (NASW Code of Ethics, 2008). One of the major responsibilities of the Social Work faculty is to support students through the process of addressing an agency-based ethical problem during the practicum year. The Director of Social Work Field Education will support, supervise, guide, and direct that process. However, each person has procedural expectations that must be met in order to bring the ethical problem to a successful resolution. I. Student A. Upon learning of a potential agency-based ethical problem, the student is expected to do the following: 1. Discuss the problem with the Faculty Field Liaison and the agency Field Instructor. Both are always the first two persons to be told about the ethical problem. The student may choose either one as the first person to consult. However, the student must notify the other person within seven (7) days. In the event where the Field Instructor is suspected of unethical behavior, the Faculty Field Liaison automatically becomes the first person to be consulted. 2. Ask the Field Instructor, or other appropriate agency personnel, if the agency has a written personnel or ethical grievance procedure. If so, the student is expected to follow the agency’s procedures. inform the Faculty Field Liaison of the intra-agency personnel and/or ethical grievance procedure. Write an ethical incident report. The report must include data related to: a. 3. a. b. c. d. 121 when, where, and under what circumstances the incident occurred; who was involved; what the ethical problem is, citing relevant sections of the NASW Code of Ethics; what the ethical implications and dilemmas may be; what, if anything, has already been done in reference to this problem; and, f. the student's own ideas and suggestions about how this problem should be approached. Submit identical copies of the report to both the Faculty Field Liaison and the Field Instructor. e. 4. 5. Understand that neither Wheelock College nor the agency can guarantee complete student confidentiality because of the profession's requirement to act on ethical problems. 6. Refrain from sharing the ethical problem with agency personnel, at least initially, except for the Field Instructor. B. In the event that it is the Field Instructor who is suspected of unethical behavior, or the agency does not have an ethical or grievance procedure, the student will proceed with the following steps: 122 1. Inform the Faculty Field Liaison, who will in turn inform the Director of Social Work Field Education. 2. Consult relevant literature on ethical decision making, and seek additional consultation from one or more of the following: agency-based, school-based, or professional organization-based ethics committee, the profession's regulatory body such as the social work licensing board, knowledgeable colleagues, other agency supervisors, or legal counsel. (Refer to phone numbers given below) 3. Take action after discussion with the Faculty Field Liaison and Director of Social Work Field Education. 4. Notify the Faculty Field Liaison and the Director of Social Work Field Education of the action and outcome of the ethical problem. In the event that the student is dissatisfied with the way the Faculty Field Liaison is addressing his or her ethical concerns, the student will go directly to the Director of Social Work Field Education and, if necessary, to the Program Chair. II. Field Instructor A. Upon learning of a potential agency-based ethical problem, the Field Instructor is expected to do the following: 1. Hold an initial discussion with the student about the ethical problem. 2. Contact the Faculty Field Liaison and hold a three-way conference to decide what to do. 3. Make available to the student a copy of the intra-agency procedures. 4. Read student's ethical incident report. 5. Support the student's effort to utilize resources and take appropriate action. III. Faculty Field Liaison A. Upon learning of a potential agency-based ethical problem, the Faculty Field Liaison is expected to do the following: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Hold an initial discussion with the student about the ethical problem. Contact the Field Instructor and hold a three-way conference to decide what to do. Send copy of the intra-agency procedures to the Director of Social Work Field Education. Read the student's ethical incident report and forward a copy to the Director or Assistant Director of Social Work Field Education. Support the student's effort to utilize resources and take appropriate action. Encourage the student to bring up issue in the Field Seminar. (No names of agency staff should be used.) Consult with Director of Social Work Field Education about the appropriateness of keeping the student at the practicum site. IV. Director of Social Work Field Education A. Upon learning of a potential agency-based ethical problem, the Director or Assistant Director of Social Work Field Education is expected to do the following: 1. To be informed, by any of the parties involved, of the potential ethical problem within seven (7) days of the student learning of it. 2. Consult with the Faculty Field Liaison to determine what, if anything, has already been done to address the issue and whether the student is satisfied with the results of the initial consultation with Faculty Field Liaison and Field Instructor; i.e., that it was not an ethical problem, or that the agency is already aware of it and taking action. 3. Consult with the Program Chair, who will, in turn, discuss the issue with the Associate Dean, if the problem is not being addressed, or if the student and/or the Faculty Field Liaison are dissatisfied with how the issue is being handled. V. Program Chair A. Upon learning of a potential agency-based ethical problem, the Program Chair is expected to do the following: 1. Consult the Associate Dean of Social Work, Leadership, and Policy. 2. Develop a plan for addressing the concern. VI. The Associate Dean A. Upon learning of a potential agency-based ethical problem, the Associate Dean is expected to do the following: 1. Contact the Director of the site regarding the concern, when appropriate. 2. Maintain communication with the Dean of Graduate and Professional Programs, the Vice President for Academic Affairs, and the College’s attorney, if necessary, regarding further actions that might be taken. Social Work Ethics: Other Resources National Association of Social Workers (NASW) Ethical Hotline 617-227-9635, Ext. 10 (Leave name and number and someone from the Ethical Issues Committee will return your call.) NASW How to File a Grievance Hotline 617-227-9635, Ext. 17 Massachusetts Board of Registration of Social Workers 617-727-3073 123 Wheelock College – Field Practicum Field Practicum Forms (BSW & MSW) The following pages provide the Field Practicum forms that are required of all students in the field. These forms can also be found on the Field Seminar Moodle pages or by searching “Field Practicum Forms for Social Work Students” on the Wheelock website (www.wheelock.edu). All students must complete and submit forms as indicated by the field calendar available at the end of this handbook, and as requested by the Faculty Field Liaison. Delayed or non-submission of Field Practicum forms may result in a failing grade or the delay in final grade assignment. Forms include: Field Placement Information Sheet 124 Flexible Field Option Agreement Student Internship at Employment Agreement Learning Contract & Evaluation: BSW & Foundation Year MSW Learning Contract & Evaluation: MSW Concentration Year Student Weekly Report on Field Practicum Verbatim Process Recording Form Larger Systems Process Recording Form Group and Family Process Recording Form Perception of Disrupted Placement - Student Perception of Disrupted Placement - Faculty Field Liaison Perception of Disrupted Placement - Field Instructor Evaluation of Practicum Site - Student Evaluation of Practicum Site & Field Instructor - Faculty Field Liaison Evaluation of Faculty Field Liaison - Field Instructor Summary of Student Practicum Experience - Faculty Field Liaison 2014-2015 Important Social Work Field Education Dates Wheelock College Social Work Field Education Office FIELD PLACEMENT INFORMATION SHEET 1. CONTACT INFORMATION Full Name: Address during Academic Year: Home Phone: Personal Email Address: Wheelock Email Address: Cell Phone: Program Plan and Location (check all that apply): Boston Worcester 2. PLACEMENT IS FOR: Full-time Part-time Advanced Standing BSW (min. of 16 hours/week) MSW Foundation Year (min. of 16 hours/week) MSW Concentration Year (min. of 24 hours/week) Advanced Standing (100 hour summer placement + Concentration Year) 3. DUAL DEGREE/CERTFICIATES JJYA (BSW) Organizational Leadership (MSW) Medical Social Work (MSW) Early Childhood Mental Health (MSW) 4. Attach Resume (visit the Center for Career & Professional Development web page for assistance http://www.wheelock.edu/academics/career-services/students-and-alumni) 5. What languages do you speak (other than English)? 6. Will you have access to an automobile this school year? Do you have a valid driver’s license? Y N 7. Are you a U.S. Citizen? Y Fluency: Y N N 8. Please identify, or be prepared to discuss, any special circumstances which may need to be considered with regard to field placement (sensory or physical limitations, personal experience with a content area, home responsibilities, schedule constraints, or others): 9. Are you considering doing an internship at your place of employment? (Discuss with assigned Field Education staff member) 125 Y N 10: Are you considering utilizing the flexible field option during your internship? Y N (for Boston MSW only; Foundation Year 12 hours/week; Concentration Year 16 hours/week) 11. Is geographic location a major consideration for you in field agency placement? If yes, please explain: Y N 12. Do you have any strong negative or positive feelings about the type of agency, population, or issue area where you might be placed? If so, please specify briefly: 13. If you are a working student, what plans have you made to decrease or flex your hours in order to complete your field education hours? (Field Education hours are typically completed during the Monday to Friday, 8am to 5pm work week). 14. What are you hoping to get out of your internship this year? 15. What skills and knowledge do you bring to your placement? Please summarize your previous social service experience. 16. What skills and knowledge do you hope to develop this year? 17. What is your learning style and what type of supervision do you prefer? 18. What is your ability/preference to work both independently and in teams? 19. Please note anything else you think is important to be considered during your placement planning process: Come prepared to discuss different experiences that what you have had, strengths and gaps in your skills, new settings, populations and your career goals. RESUME MUST ACCOMPANY THIS FORM Please email both to your assigned Field Education staff: dreber@wheelock.edu or dzipoli@wheelock.edu or tmoynahan@wheelock.edu I am aware that most agencies are required to request Criminal History Record checks prior to approving student placement. I am also aware that I may be responsible for facilitating my own Criminal History Record checks. I am aware that some placement agencies may require health clearances prior to beginning placement for which I am responsible. I am also aware that my resume and information about my educational and professional experience will be shared and transmitted electronically to prospective field education agencies. By checking this box, you confirm that you have read and completed this Field Placement Information Sheet *Form adapted from Salem State University School of Social Work – 03/2014 126 Wheelock College – Field Practicum Flexible Field OPTION Agreement Purpose: To document student’s understanding of implications of extending field placement hours; document agency agreement with flexible field schedule Filled out by: Student; agency and student signature required Submitted to: Social Work Field Education Office by Friday, September 12, 2014 The MSW Program at Wheelock College is committed to providing support and flexibility to our students so that they have the greatest opportunity to be successful in achieving academic and professional goals. Being mindful that many of our students are not only graduate students but may also be juggling an array of professional and personal responsibilities, we work with the individual student, the Faculty Advisor, and the potential Field Practicum site to craft a program plan that best suits the student’s individual needs (e.g., extended/“flex” field placement). The student is still required to meet all the requirements of her/his educational program and to fulfill the expectations of the practicum site. Please note that most field placement sites require students to be available during typical business hours, Monday-Friday, 8 a.m. – 5 p.m. A very limited number of field placement sites may be able to accommodate internship hours in the evenings and on weekends and cannot be guaranteed. Students who would like to utilize the “Flexible Field” option must have this approved by the th practicum site and fill out the associated paperwork prior to September 12 . Foundation Year MSW students utilizing the Flexible Field Option are required to be in field a minimum of 12 hours a week. Concentration Year MSW students utilizing the Flexible Field Option are required to be in field a minimum of 16 hours a week. Students opting for the Flexible Field Option may see their practicum extended beyond the end of the academic year. MSW students who are in their field placement for 30 hours or more a month during the individual months of June, July or August are required to enroll in the Social Work Field Practicum and Summer Seminar. MSW students utilizing the Flexible Field Option must have this option approved by the agency and Field Instructor during the field placement process. Final semester Concentration Year students who have not completed their hours in field by the time grades close will receive an “R” for Field Practicum and Seminar indicating that they are in the process of completing their hours. The Registrar’s office can provide necessary degree completion documentation for employment purposes. Once final grades have been entered, students will receive their official diploma in August. Print Field Instructor Name: _________________________________________________________________________________ Field Instructor Signature: _____________________________________________________________________________________ Print Student Name: ________________________________________________________________________________________ Student Signature: ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Date: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 127 Wheelock College – Field Practicum Student internship at Employment Agreement Purpose: To differentiate student’s role as a learner from that of a paid employee Filled out by: Employer, Student, Internship Supervisor/Field Instructor (all three signatures required) Submitted to: Social Work Field Education Office by Friday, September 12, 2014 The undersigned agency (the “Employer”) employs the following Wheelock College student (the “Student”) and hereby releases Wheelock College (the "College") from any liability that may arise out of the Employer's employment of the Student outside a College-conducted practicum internship, field placement or other off-campus learning program ("Academically Approved Placement") and makes the following acknowledgments and agreements: The Employer acknowledges that it employs the student solely on its own behalf and not in conjunction with the College. The Employer acknowledges that the College has made no representations to the Employer, either explicit or implicit, that the student is qualified to work in any particular position with the Employer. The Employer acknowledges that the College does not, and has no responsibility to in any way supervise the student in his/her employment with the Employer. The Employer acknowledges that it did not rely on any representation, either explicit or implicitly, from the College in hiring the student and in assigning his/her tasks, but acted solely in its own discretion. The Employer agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the College for any liability arising out of the Employer's employment of the Student. Wheelock College will cover the Student under the institution’s insurance policy while in the role of a Student. The Employer acknowledges that it is responsible for insuring the Student against harm and for liability arising from his/her employment with the Employer and that such insurance is in no way the responsibility of the College. Internship placement responsibilities are to be separate from employment responsibilities. Internship supervisor is to be separate from employment supervisor. Place of Employment: ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Printed Name and Title of Employment Supervisor: ___________________________________________________________ Employment Supervisor Signature: ___________________________________________________________________________ Employment Supervisor Email: Employment Supervisor Phone: _______________________ Printed Name and Title of Internship Supervisor: ______________________________________________________________ Internship Supervisor Signature: _________________________________________________________________________________ Internship Supervisor Email: Internship Supervisor Phone: _____________________________________ Printed Name of Student: ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Student Signature: ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Date: ___________________________________________________________________________________________ 128 Wheelock College – Field Practicum Learning contract & evaluation: BSW & Foundation Year MSW The purpose of this document is to: 1) establish activities that will help BSW and Foundation Year MSW students develop and apply the Core Competencies and practice behaviors based on generalist social work practice; and 2) evaluate the student’s generalist social work practice. It is designed to serve as both the Learning Contract and Semester End Evaluation. The Learning Contract (Activities and Measurement/Methods) is to be completed by the Student and Field Instructor during the first weeks of placement and submitted to the Faculty Field Liaison. BSW students and Field Instructors are expected to update and submit these portions again in January. Foundation Year MSW students are encouraged to update throughout the academic year. The Semester I Evaluation portion is to be completed by the Student and Field Instructor at the end of the 1st semester and submitted to the Faculty Field Liaison. The Semester II Evaluation portion is to be completed by the Faculty Field Liaison in a collaborative manner with the Student and Field Instructor. □ Semester I □ Semester II Print Student Name Placement Site Print MSW Field Instructor Name Placement Address Phone Field Placement Days & Hours Email Print Agency Supervisor Name Phone Print Faculty Field Liaison Name Email Day and time of weekly supervision and other learning opportunities: Describe agency safety plan as discussed with student: □ Check if internship follows a school year calendar or alternate start or end dates. Start and end dates are:_____________________________ 129 Generalist Practice Behavior How core competency is behaviorally operationalized. Behavior student is expected to learn. Learning Contract REFERENCE KEY Learning Activities & Measurements/Methods for Responsibilities Learning Agency specific opportunities that will allow student to learn and refine generalist practice behaviors: student assignments tasks project plans learning experiences How activities will be monitored and evaluated. Examples: process recordings review exploration in supervision supervisor observation participation in meetings Field Instructor review of student documentation Role plays during supervision Evaluation Scale (not applicable for Learning Contract development) EVALUATION Scale REFERENCE KEY The following categories are based on a multidimensional framework for assessing the student’s competence which takes into account the following dimensions of performance: consistency; quality; level of independence; time needed to accomplish tasks; steady progress; integration of knowledge, values and skills; ability to transfer learning from one activity another. Each of the specific practice behaviors should be evaluated using the competency rating scale. Please provide examples under the “evaluation comments” section. This scale was crafted through NECON (New England Consortium of Graduate Social Work Field Education Directors). UP = Unacceptable Progress: Never demonstrates awareness, knowledge and skills as a social work intern PC = Pre-Competence: Rarely demonstrates and integrates, values, knowledge and skills; needs constant supervision; quality of work is uneven; tasks are not completed in reasonable time; knowledge/skills not transferred from one assignment to another; progress uncertain EC = Emerging Competence: Beginning to demonstrate or inconsistently demonstrates values, knowledge and skills; integrates and applies learning from one activity to another inconsistently or inappropriately some of the time; progressing towards effective use of supervision; learning is becoming more efficient; progress is evident and moving in a positive direction C = Competence: Consistently demonstrates and integrates values, knowledge and skills with sufficient mastery and independence; uses supervision for consultation appropriately, appropriately applies learning form one activity to another; uses time well to accomplish tasks and assignments; ready to move to advanced placement or beginning practitioner level AC = Advanced Competence: Always demonstrates, integrates and applies values, knowledge and skills in all activities independently and exceptionally well. Uses consultation appropriately; performs activities in a timely and efficient manner; able to teach others. (* NOTE: If applicable, only to be utilized during final semester) 130 THE FOLLOWING 41 GENERALIST PRACTICE BEHAVIORS ACTUALIZE THE TEN SOCIAL WORK CORE COMPETENCIES Competency #1. Professional Identity Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly GENERALIST Practice Behavior Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Semester I Advocates for client access to the services of social work □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Practices personal reflection and selfcorrection to assure continual professional development □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Attends to professional roles and boundaries □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Demonstrates professional demeanor in behavior, appearance, and communication □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Engages in career-long learning □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Effectively uses supervision and consultation □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C 131 Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Competency #2. ETHICAL PRACTICE Apply social work ethical principles to guide professional practice GENERALIST Practice Behavior Recognizes and manages personal values in a way that allows professional values to guide practice Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Semester I □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Makes ethical decisions by applying standards of the NASW Code of Ethics and, as applicable, of the International Federation of Social Workers/International Association of Schools of Social Work Ethics in Social Work, Statement of Principles Tolerates ambiguity in resolving ethical conflicts □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Applies strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled decisions □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C 132 □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Competency #3. CRITICAL THINKING Apply CRITICAL THINKING TO INFORM AND COMMUNICATE PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENTS GENERALIST Practice Behavior Distinguishes, appraises, and integrates multiple sources of knowledge, including research-based knowledge, and practice wisdom Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Semester I □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Analyzes models of assessment, prevention, intervention, and evaluation □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Demonstrates effective oral and written communication in working with individuals, families, groups, organizations, communities, and colleagues □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C 133 Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Competency #4. Diversity in practice Engage diversity and differences in practice GENERALIST Practice Behavior Recognizes the extent to which a culture’s structures and values may oppress, marginalize, alienate, or create or enhance privilege and power Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Semester I □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Gains sufficient self-awareness to eliminate the influence of personal biases and values in working with diverse groups □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Recognizes and communicates an understanding of the importance of difference in shaping life experiences □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Views self as learner and engages those with whom they work as informants □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C 134 Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Competency #5. Human rights & justice advance human rights and social and economic justice GENERALIST Practice Behavior Understands the forms and mechanisms of oppression and discrimination Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Semester I □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Advocates for human rights and social and economic justice □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Engages in practices that advance social and economic justice □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C 135 Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Competency #6. Research based practice Engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed Research GENERALIST Practice Behavior Uses practice experience to inform scientific inquiry Uses research evidence to inform practice 136 Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Semester I □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Competency #7. Human behavior Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment GENERALIST Practice Behavior Utilizes conceptual frameworks to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation Critiques and applies knowledge to understand person and environment 137 Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Semester I □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Competency #8. Policy practice Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being to deliver effective social work services GENERALIST Practice Behavior Analyzes, formulates and advocates for policies that advance social well-being Collaborates with colleagues and clients for effective policy action 138 Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Semester I □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Competency #9. Practice Contexts Respond to contexts that shape practice GENERALIST Practice Behavior Continuously discovers, appraises and attends to changing locales, populations, scientific and technological developments, and emerging societal trends to provide relevant services Provides leadership in promoting sustainable changes in service delivery and practice to improve the quality of social services 139 Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Semester I □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * competency #10. Engage, Assess, Intervene, Evaluate Engage, assess, intervene, and evaluate with individuals, families, groups, organizations and communities GENERALIST Practice Behavior Engagement Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Semester I Substantively and affectively prepares for action with individuals, families, groups, organizations and communities □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Uses empathy and other interpersonal skills □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Develops a mutually agreed-on focus of work and desired outcomes □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Assessment Collects organizes, and interprets client data □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Assesses client strengths and limitations □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Develops mutually agreed-on intervention goals and objectives □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C 140 □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * GENERALIST Practice Behavior Selects appropriate intervention strategies Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Semester I Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Implements prevention interventions that enhance client capacities □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Helps clients resolve problems □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Negotiates, mediates, and advocates for clients □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Facilitates transitions and endings □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Intervention Initiates actions to achieve organizational goals 141 GENERALIST Practice Behavior Evaluation Critically analyzes, monitors, and evaluates interventions Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Evaluation Comments Examples used to support evaluation scale ratings of generalist practice behaviors: Field Instructor’s overall evaluation of the student’s performance: 142 Evaluation Semester I Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Professional growth and development goals for next semester: Student comments on strengths and areas for improvement: Print Student Name: Print Field Instructor Name: Learning Contract Signatures: Student Signature: Date: Instructor WheelockField College – Signature: Field Practicum Date: Learning contract & evaluation: BSW & Foundation Year MSW practice behaviors Print Faculty Liaison Name: Faculty Field Liaison Signature:Year MSW students develop and Date: The purpose of Field this document is to: 1.) establish activities that will help BSW and Foundation apply the Core Competencies and practice behaviors based on generalist social work practice; and, 2.) evaluate the student’s generalist social work practice. Semester I Evaluation Signatures: Student Signature: Date: Print Field Instructor Name: Field Instructor Signature: Date: Print Faculty Field Liaison Name: Faculty Field Liaison Signature: Date: Print Student Name: It is the responsibility of each student to keep a copy of their Learning Contract(s) and Evaluation(s) for their records. 143 Wheelock College – Field Practicum Learning contract & evaluation: MSW Concentration Year The purpose of this document is to: 1) establish activities that will help students develop and apply the MSW program’s advanced practice behaviors; and 2) evaluate the student’s advanced social work practice. It is designed to serve as both the Learning Contract and Semester End Evaluation. The Learning Contract (Activities and Measurement/Methods) is to be completed by the Student and Field Instructor during the first weeks of placement and submitted to the Faculty Field Liaison. The Semester I Evaluation portion is to be completed by the Student and Field Instructor at the end of the 1st semester and submitted to the Faculty Field Liaison. The Semester II Evaluation portion is to be completed by the Faculty Field Liaison in a collaborative manner with the Student and Field Instructor. □ Semester I □ Semester II Print Student Name Placement Site Print MSW Field Instructor Name Placement Address Phone Field Placement Days & Hours Email Print Agency Supervisor Name Print Faculty Field Liaison Name Phone Email Day and time of weekly supervision and other learning opportunities: Describe agency safety plan as discussed with student: □ Check if internship follows a school year calendar or alternate start or end dates. Start and end dates are:______________________ 144 Learning Contract REFERENCE KEY Advanced Practice Behavior Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning How core competency is behaviorally operationalized. Behavior student is expected to learn. Agency specific opportunities that will allow student to learn and refine advanced practice behaviors: student assignments tasks project plans learning experiences How learning activities will be monitored, evaluated. Examples: process recordings review exploration in supervision supervisor observation participation in meetings Field Instructor review of student documentation Role plays during supervision Evaluation Scale (not applicable for Learning Contract development) EVALUATION Scale REFERENCE KEY The following categories are based on a multidimensional framework for assessing the student’s competence which takes into account the following dimensions of performance: consistency; quality; level of independence; time needed to accomplish tasks; steady progress; integration of knowledge, values and skills; ability to transfer learning from one activity another. Each of the specific practice behaviors should be evaluated using the competency rating scale. Please provide examples under the “evaluation comments” section. This scale was crafted through NECON (New England Consortium of Graduate Social Work Field Education Directors). UP = Unacceptable Progress: Never demonstrates awareness, knowledge and skills as a social work intern PC = Pre-Competence: Rarely demonstrates and integrates, values, knowledge and skills; needs constant supervision; quality of work is uneven; tasks are not completed in reasonable time; knowledge/skills not transferred from one assignment to another; progress uncertain EC = Emerging Competence: Beginning to demonstrate or inconsistently demonstrates values, knowledge and skills; integrates and applies learning from one activity to another inconsistently or inappropriately some of the time; progressing towards effective use of supervision; learning is becoming more efficient; progress is evident and moving in a positive direction C = Competence: Consistently demonstrates and integrates values, knowledge and skills with sufficient mastery and independence; uses supervision for consultation appropriately, appropriately applies learning form one activity to another; uses time well to accomplish tasks and assignments; ready to move to advanced placement or beginning practitioner level AC = Advanced Competence: Always demonstrates, integrates and applies values, knowledge and skills in all activities independently and exceptionally well. Uses consultation appropriately; performs activities in a timely and efficient manner; able to teach others. (* NOTE: If applicable, only to be utilized during final semester) 145 After successfully attaining the Practice Behaviors in the Foundation Year, students should be able to apply Advanced Practice Behaviors that further actualize the Social Work Core Competencies. The Advanced Practice Behaviors are: Competency #1. Professional Identity Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly ADVANCED Practice Behavior Demonstrates integration of self-reflection and self-care, applied differential use of self, and growth through use of supervision and consultation in service of the development of a professional social work identity that is action-oriented, strengths and justice based, and progressively taking a leadership stance in all professional settings. 146 Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Semester I □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Competency #2. ETHICAL PRACTICE Apply social work ethical principles to guide professional practice ADVANCED Practice Behavior Demonstrate the capacity to analyze complex individual, family, group, organizational, and community issues and solutions that directly apply to social work ethics, reasoning, and practice principles that advance human rights and social and economic justice. 147 Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Semester I □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Competency #3. CRITICAL THINKING Apply CRITICAL THINKING TO INFORM AND COMMUNICATE PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENTS ADVANCED Practice Behavior Apply principles of logic, scientific inquiry, and reasoning discernment. Critical thinking also requires the synthesis and communication of relevant information. Utilize critical thinking augmented by creativity, curiosity, and continual professional development. 148 Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Semester I □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Competency #4. Diversity in practice Engage diversity and differences in practice ADVANCED Practice Behavior Develop an increasingly explicit and integrated approach to global human diversity applying an intersectional analysis to the evaluation and articulation of the effects of power and privilege, including one’s own location in these dynamics. 149 Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Semester I □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Competency #5. Human rights & justice advance human rights and social and economic justice ADVANCED Practice Behavior Design, analyze, strategize, and advocate with client systems on behalf of the human rights of individuals and groups whose lived experiences and sociocultural memberships represent varying degrees of power, privilege, and oppression. 150 Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Semester I □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Competency #6. Research based practice Engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed Research ADVANCED Practice Behavior Access, assess, apply, & evaluate research findings to inform justicebased practice with children and families. 151 Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Semester I □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Competency #7. Human behavior Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment ADVANCED Practice Behavior Critically evaluate and apply human behavior and the social environment theories in justice-based, multiculturally responsible ways to promote social change. 152 Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Semester I Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Competency #8. Policy practice ENGAGE IN POLICY PRACTICE TO ADVANCE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC WELL-BEING TO DELiVER EFFECTIVE SOCIAL WORK SERVICES ADVANCED Practice Behavior Demonstrate the ability to take a leadership role in effective collaboration in the design, implementation, and evaluation of a policy practice that advances human rights and social justice. 153 Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Semester I □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Competency #9. Practice Contexts Respond to contexts that shape practice ADVANCED Practice Behavior Utilize emerging scientific and technological developments and societal trends to provide optimal services as part of an ecosystemic and justice based approach in all areas of practice and to support professional development and life-long learning. 154 Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Semester I □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Competency #10. Engage, Assess, Intervene, Evaluate Engage, assess, intervene, and evaluate with individuals, families, groups, organizations and communities ADVANCED Practice Behavior Demonstrate the advanced ability to synthesize social work knowledge, skills, and values, and use of self to plan, implement, and critically evaluate practice and collaboration with diverse individuals, families, and larger systems. Learning Activities & Responsibilities Measurements/Methods for Learning Evaluation Comments Examples used to support evaluation scale ratings of advanced practice behaviors: 155 Evaluation Semester I □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C Evaluation Semester II □ UP □ PC □ EC □ C □ AC * Field Instructor’s overall evaluation of the student’s performance: Professional growth and development goals for next semester: 156 Student comments on strengths and areas for improvement: Learning Contract Signatures: Student Signature: Date: Print Field Instructor Name: Field Instructor Signature: Date: Print Faculty Field Liaison Name: Faculty Field Liaison Signature: Date: Print Student Name: Print Student Name: Semester I Evaluation Signatures: Student Signature: Date: Print Field Instructor Name: Field Instructor Signature: Date: Print Faculty Field Liaison Name: Faculty Field Liaison Signature: Date: It is the responsibility of each student to keep a copy of their Learning Contract(s) and Evaluation(s) for their records. 157 Wheelock College – Field Practicum Student Weekly Report on Field Practicum Purpose: Link Field Practicum learning experiences to Core Competencies and document hours in the field Filled Out By: Student; reviewed and signed by Field Instructor Submitted To: Faculty Field Liaison Complete a report each week; begin week on Monday and report in 15 minute intervals, rounding off the numbers to a quarter of an hour (¼, ½, ¾, etc.). Name(Print): Learning Opportunities Direct Services Individual Meeting/Session Family Meeting/Session Collateral Meeting/Session Group Facilitation Phone Contact on behalf of clients Direct Service Documentation Other: Planning & Leadership Attending community meetings Technology utilization (internet/intranet) Meeting prep (agenda, materials, scheduling) Planning for Trainings, Seminars & Workshops Facilitation of Trainings, Seminars, Workshops & Meetings Team and committee work Organizing outreach/recruitment events Other: Policy Practice Attending/assisting with an advocacy event Commenting on or creating content on blogs/other social media Analyzing policies Other: Research Program/project literature review Analyzing survey results Grant/stakeholder research Program Development Curricula/Project content development 158 Date: Mon. Tues. Wed. Thurs. Fri. Sat. Sun. Learning Opportunities Content and material development Other: Misc. Supervision (minimum 1hr/week) Intern Group Meetings Travel within practicum (meetings, conferences) Lifelong learning: attending training, workshop, seminar, etc. Other: Total # of hours: Report for the week of: Mon. Tues. Total Hours for Week: Wed. Thurs. Fri. Sat. Sun. Total Cumulative Hours: It is the responsibility of each student to track weekly hours, total cumulative hours and secure Field Instructor signature. Students must keep a copy of every weekly report they submit for their personal records. BSW: Weekly minimum16 hours; Semester minimum 200 hours; Year total 400 hours MSW Foundation Year: Weekly minimum 16 hours (12 if Flex-field); Semester minimum 240 hours; Year total 480 hours MSW Concentration Year: Weekly minimum 24 hours (16 if Flex-field); Semester minimum 360 hours; Year total 720 hours Advanced Standing: Weekly minimum 24 hours (16 if Flex-field); summer minimum 100 hours; fall 360 hours; spring 360 hours; Year total 820 hours Council on Social Work Education (CSWE) Core Competencies 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Professional Identity Ethical Practice Critical Thinking Diversity in Practice Human Rights & Justice 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Research Based Practice Human Behavior Policy Practice Practice Contexts Engage, Assess, Intervene, Evaluate Identify a minimum of two examples from this week’s social work practice that reflect the CSWE Core Competencies. Core Competency: Practice Experience Core Competency Practice Experience Core Competency Practice Experience Field Instructor Signature: (not initials): 159 Wheelock College – Field Practicum Verbatim process recording explanation & format (BSW & MSW) A. Definition: The process recording is a teaching tool. It is a specialized and highly detailed form of case recording. Process recording is a written, often verbatim, account of an interaction between a social work intern and a client-system. It can also be an account of an interaction between a social work intern and her/his Field Instructor in relation to a specific client system or course project. In addition, comments about client- system behaviors and student behaviors, thoughts, and feelings are recorded. It is the only practical method that comes close to direct observation of what takes place in interactions between student and client-systems. There are two principle types of process recordings: B. Process recordings serve the following functions which aid the supervision process: 160 Verbatim recording: “I said, s/he said.” This type of process recording sets down the exact details of an interchange. Summary of Group/Larger Systems recording is a different style of recording. It is most often used in documenting group experiences, various types of meetings and other interactions with larger systems. Some Field Instructors may prefer this over the verbatim style, retaining verbatim recording for the specific part of the interview that the student wishes to highlight for supervisory discussion. If the Field Instructor does not have a preference for a process recording style, the Faculty Field Liaison’s recommendation should be followed. Documentation of student’s activity – Recordings provide a mechanism for the student to document involvement with client-systems or projects, the progress in achieving contracted goals, and the outcome of the intervention(s). Organizing the student’s observations – Recordings provide a structured presentation of factual client-system data, observations of the client, and student observations of her/his own thoughts and feelings in this interaction. These observations can lead to a more in-depth assessment and evaluation of the client- system on the part of the student. Field Instructor review – Recordings are a means of keeping track of the student’s performance. They enable the Field Instructor to assess the kind and quality of the student’s interactions with her/his clients, and provide a common ground for in depth dialogue with the student. Teaching – Recordings are a mechanism for mutual assessment of practice skills and the teaching of new or refined techniques. They enable the Field Instructor to: identify skills and strengths as well as areas requiring work; help interns acquire new techniques; explain why an interchange was or was not effective; suggest and role-play alternative approaches; provide constructive criticism as well as positive feedback; and, establish consistency both from session to session and from client to C. client in evaluating process recordings. Student self-evaluation over time – Recordings are a way to gather and compare the student’s client-system interactions at different points of time in order to assess progress and skills acquired. What should go into process recordings: Recordings should be as accurate as possible, capturing the essence of the interaction. It is important for the process recording to include relevant details such as the setting and nonverbal behavior of both the client-system and the student. Each recording should begin with a date and a brief paragraph summarizing the context of the interview. Especially important, process recordings should include the student's commentary, her/his interpretation of what seemed to be going on, and thoughts, feelings, reactions, and interpretations of client words and behavior - either at the time of the interview or in retrospect. 161 Identifying information student name date of interview client-system’s name (alter to protect confidentiality) number of interview, e.g. first, second, etc. An initial description of the interaction in paragraph form A detailed recounting of the interaction verbatim summary of group/larger systems A description of any action or nonverbal activity that occurred The student’s feelings and reactions to the client-system and to the interview as it takes place; i.e., putting into writing unspoken thoughts and reactions as the interview is occurring. The student’s observations and analysis about what has been happening during the interview. The student’s impressions about the entire interview that s/he has just recorded, formulated at the end of the process recording. Wheelock College – Field Practicum Verbatim PROCESS RECORDING FORM Purpose: Capture, examine and process verbatim client interactions Completed by: Student and submitted to Field Instructor for review, comments and discussion. Students are expected to complete one process recording for every week they are in their placement and submit seven process recordings per semester to their Faculty Field Liaison. Submitted to: Faculty Field Liaison (ideally, after Field Instructor comments have been provided to student). Faculty Field Liaison will review, comment and return to student. Student is expected to integrate feedback into future practice and future process recordings accordingly. Instructions: Identify key areas of interaction during the session in the columns below. Use summarizing statements to fill in gaps between significant verbatim interactions. This process recording should be a minimum of 7 – 10 single-spaced, typed pages. Handwritten pages should be a minimum of 14 – 20 pages. All identifying information should be omitted or changed to ensure client confidentiality. YOUR NAME: DATE: Contextual Introduction: (client description, purpose of interaction, location of interaction, interview # if one of series, etc.) Student & Client Verbatim Dialogue 162 Student Observations of Client & Environmental Surroundings Student Observations of Self (feelings, thoughts, reactions, etc.) Field Instructor Comments Summarize and reflect upon your interaction with the client. Include comments on what you did well and what you will do differently next time: Future plans: Questions for Supervision: Field Instructor Signature and Date: Field Instructor Comments: Faculty Field Liaison Signature and Date: Faculty Field Liaison Comments: 163 Wheelock College – Field Practicum SUMMARY OF Larger SYSTEMS PROCESS RECORDING FORM (BSW & MSW) Purpose: Capture, examine and process larger system interactions. (Larger system examples include: coalition meetings, community organizing events, staff meetings, board meetings, advocacy/policy work, trainings, etc.) Completed by: Student and submitted to Field Instructor for review, comments and discussion. Students are expected to complete one process recording for every week they are in their placement and submit seven process recordings per semester to their Faculty Field Liaison. Submitted to: Faculty Field Liaison (ideally, after Field Instructor comments have been provided to student). Faculty Field Liaison will review, comment and return to student. Student is expected to integrate feedback into future practice and future process recordings accordingly. This Process Recording should be a minimum of 5 single-spaced, typed pages pages. All identifying information should be omitted or changed to ensure client confidentiality. YOUR NAME: DATE: Provide relevant historical, political, community or system context: Meeting location: Leader/Co-leaders: Members in attendance: Specific tasks done by intern in order to prepare for meeting: General mission/purpose of system: Goal for this session: Activities/Content to be covered/Agenda for the meeting: 164 Discussion topics raised: Describe the different roles you observed during the session. (Examples might include: peacekeeper, monopolizer, harmonizer, scapegoat, gatekeeper, quiet member, follower, internal leader, etc.). Note functional/dysfunctional nature of role taken, impact on system and goal for future intervention. Have these roles changed over time? Describe. Significant interactions in this session: (note who participated; positive/negative tone of individual members and overall tone of the system) Comment on system cohesion: (note differences of opinion and/or conflicts) Comment on decision-making process: Comment on system morale: Comment on system leadership: What issues need special attention in the next session? Comment on the system’s current stage of development. Note significant contributions by individual members or subgroups which require special attention, observation, follow up or research: 165 Describe specific tasks related to the following roles you carried out: (If you did not perform a task/role, comment on the role of each system member) Preparation for Meeting: (level of information given prior to the meeting) Presenter: (sharing information with others) Facilitator: (convening and leading system process) Collaborator or co-facilitators: (intervening in partnership with other workers) Organizer: (recruiting clients, community and/or staff for action) Observer/participant, advocate: (working on behalf of clients, agency or community) Summarize your impressions. Include comments on what you did well and what you may do differently next time: Follow up/Next steps: Questions for Supervision: 166 Field Instructor Signature and Date: Field Instructor Comments: Faculty Field Liaison Signature and Date: Faculty Field Liaison Comments: 167 Wheelock College – Field Practicum Group or Family Process Recording (BSW & MSW) Purpose: Capture, examine and process group or family interactions Completed by: Student and submitted to Field Instructor for review, comments and discussion. Students are expected to complete one process recording for every week they are in their placement and submit seven process recordings per semester to their Faculty Field Liaison. Submitted to: Faculty Field Liaison (ideally, after Field Instructor comments have been provided to student). Faculty Field Liaison will review, comment and return to student. Student is expected to integrate feedback into future practice and future process recordings accordingly. This process recording should be a minimum of 7 – 10 single-spaced, typed pages. Handwritten pages should be a minimum of 14 – 20 pages. All identifying information should be omitted or changed to ensure client confidentiality. YOUR NAME: Type of Session: (Family or Group) DATE: Session #: Purpose/goal(s) for the session: Planned Agenda: Summarize the session: (Include comments on tone/atmosphere and key dynamics related to session content and process.) Describe the work/growth – both individual and collective – that was accomplished during the session: Did you observe any mutual aid? (Examples might include: sharing data, dialectical process, all-in-the-sameboat phenomenon, developing a universal perspective, mutual support, mutual demand, rehearsal, strength in numbers, etc.) 168 Were there any obstacles to mutual aid in this session? Were there any new problems, issues, themes addressed in this session? Describe any challenging dynamics. How do you make meaning of these dynamics? Describe the different roles you observed during the session. (Examples might include: peacekeeper, monopolizer, harmonizer, scapegoat, gatekeeper, quiet member, follower, internal leader, etc.). Note functional/dysfunctional nature of role taken, impact on system and goal for future intervention. Have these roles changed over time? Describe. What issues need special attention in the next session? Comment on the stage of development: Based on your analysis, what did you do well and what will you do differently next time? Topics to explore/debrief with co-facilitator: Questions for Supervision: 169 In the section below, identify key areas of interaction during the session. Use verbatim accounts to describe the interactions and your interactions. Use summarizing statements to fill gaps between key interactions. This section should be a minimum of three pages, single space. Verbatim Dialogue Student Observations of Client & Environmental Surroundings Field Instructor Signature and Date: Field Instructor Comments: Faculty Field Liaison Signature and Date: Faculty Field Liaison Comments: 170 Student Observation of Self (feelings, thoughts, reactions, etc.) Field Instructor’s Comments Wheelock College – Field Practicum PERCEPTION OF DISRUPTED PLACEMENT - STUDENT Purpose: To obtain student’s feedback about a disrupted placement Filled out by: Student Submitted to: Social Work Field Education Office within two weeks of disruption Name of Student (Print) Date Field Instructor Title Placement Site Faculty Field Liaison__________________ Date You Last Attended Placement This disrupted placement occurred during: Placement Year □ BSW □ Fall Semester □ MSW - Foundation □ Spring Semester □ MSW - Concentration How long were you placed at the agency before disruption? How many hours did you complete in the field? ______________________________ The disruption was initiated by: □ Student □ Faculty Field Liaison □ Field Instructor Please indicate why the placement was disrupted (i.e., the major issues): □ unsatisfactory performance: □ Student □ Faculty Field Liaison □ Field Instructor □ poor match between my needs and expectations, and what the agency could offer □ unavailability of appropriate cases for student to work with □ supervision concerns (i.e. no MSW; inconsistent supervision) □ difficulty with transportation □ agency going through restructuring □ safety concerns □ other/additional information. Please describe the reason for the disruption: Please describe what efforts were made to prevent this disruption: 171 Please describe what, if anything, you could have done differently during the placement process (with support from the Social Work Field Education Office) and during the field experience (with support from your Faculty Field Liaison) to prevent this disruption: If applicable, what recommendations do you have regarding your readiness to return to the field: What kinds of students might do well as interns in this agency? What kinds of students might not do well as interns in this agency? Additional comments: (attach additional sheets if necessary) Student Signature 172 Wheelock College – Field Practicum PERCEPTION OF DISRUPTED PLACEMENT - Faculty Field Liaison Purpose: To obtain Faculty Field Liaison’s perception about the disrupted placement Filled out by: Faculty Field Liaison Submitted to: Social Work Field Education Office within two weeks of disruption Name of Student Date Field Instructor Title Placement Site Date Student Last Attended Placement _______________________________________________ This disrupted placement occurred during: Placement Year □ BSW □ Fall Semester □ MSW - Foundation □ Spring Semester □ MSW - Concentration How long was the student at the agency before he or she left? How many hours did the student complete in the field? ______________________________ The disruption was initiated by: □ Student □ Faculty Field Liaison □ Field Instructor (Please check all that apply) Please indicate why the placement was disrupted (i.e., the major issues): □ unsatisfactory performance: □ Student □ Faculty Field Liaison □ Field Instructor □ poor match between student needs and expectations, and what the agency could offer □ unavailability of appropriate cases for student to work with □ supervision concerns (i.e. no MSW; inconsistent supervision) □ difficulty with transportation □ agency going through restructuring □ safety concerns □ other/additional information. Please describe the reason for the disruption: Please describe what efforts were made to prevent this disruption: Please describe what, if anything, could have been done differently during the placement process and the field experience to prevent this disruption: 173 If applicable, what recommendations do you have regarding the student’s readiness to return to the field: What kinds of students might do well as interns in this agency? What kinds of students might not do well as interns in this agency? Additional comments: (attach additional sheets if necessary) Faculty Field Liaison Signature: ____________________________________ 174 Wheelock College – Field Practicum PERCEPTION OF DISRUPTED PLACEMENT - Field Instructor Purpose: To obtain Field Instructor’s feedback about a disrupted placement Filled out by: Field Instructor Submitted to: Social Work Field Education Office within two weeks of disruption Name of Student Date Field Instructor Title Placement Site Faculty Field Liaison ____________________Date Student Last Attended Placement This disrupted placement occurred during: Placement Year □ BSW □Fall Semester □ MSW - Foundation □Spring Semester □ MSW - Concentration How long was student placed at the agency before disruption? _________ How many hours did the student complete in the field? _________________________________ The disruption was initiated by: □ Student □ Faculty Field Liaison □ Field Instructor (Please check all that apply) Please indicate why the placement was disrupted (i.e., the major issues): □ unsatisfactory performance: □ Student □ Faculty Field Liaison □ Field Instructor □ poor match between my needs and expectations, and what the agency could offer □ unavailability of appropriate cases for student to work with □ supervision concerns (i.e. no MSW; inconsistent supervision) □ difficulty with transportation □ agency going through restructuring □ safety concerns □ other/additional information. Please describe the reason for the disruption? Please describe what efforts were made to prevent this disruption: Please describe what, if anything, could have been done differently during the placement process and the field experience to prevent this disruption: 175 If applicable, what recommendations do you have regarding the student’s readiness to return to the field: What kinds of students might do well as interns in this agency? What kinds of students might not do well as interns in this agency? Additional comments: (attach additional sheets if necessary) Field Instructor Signature 176 Wheelock College – Field Practicum EVALUATION OF PRACTICUM SITE - STUDENT Purpose: To solicit feedback in order to inform placement of future students Filled out by: Student during last Field Seminar class Submitted to: Social Work Field Education Office by the end of each semester Ongoing evaluation is key to a quality Social Work Program. Recognizing that no practicum site is perfect, we are soliciting your honest feedback. This will help the Social Work Program in matching students with placements. Agencies that serve as practicum sites can also benefit from your suggestions for improvement of the placement experience for future students. Thank you for completing this form. Student’s Name (Print) Date Practicum Site Address If large agency, please specify department Field Instructor Title If applicable, Agency Supervisor Placement Year □ BSW □ MSW - Foundation □ MSW - Concentration 1. Briefly describe nature of site - population served, size, mission and purpose, of the agency 2. How is this placement in alignment with the mission of the college and the Social Work Department? (mission of the college: improving the lives of children and families. Social Work Department: human rights and social justice): 3. Describe your learning activities throughout the year 4. If there were some responsibilities or experiences you wish you had but did not get, please list/explain: 5. What are the strengths of this placement? 6. What are the weaknesses or limitations of this placement? 7. What changes could this practicum site make in order to provide a better placement experience for interns? 177 8. How would you assess this placement as a future site for social work students? 9. Were your supervision expectations met? □ Yes □ No 10. What kind of students would do best at this placement? 11. Have you shared your feedback with your supervisor? If not, please explain briefly 12. Field Instructors and/or Agency Supervisors often request students' feedback. Would you consent to sharing information from this evaluation with your Field Instructor or your Faculty Field Liaison? □ Yes □ No If yes, please sign below. 13. Would you consent to sharing information from this evaluation with other students? □ Yes □ No If yes, please sign below. Additional Comments: (attach additional sheets if necessary) Student Signature Print Name: 178 Date Wheelock College – Field Practicum EVALUATION OF PRACTICUM Site & Field Instructor - Faculty Field Liaison Purpose: To solicit feedback to inform future placement of students Filled out by: Faculty Field Liaison Submitted to: Social Work Field Education Office in December. Evaluation should be modified as needed during 2ndsemester Name of Practicum Site (if large agency, specify department) Name of Field Instructor (FI) Title Name of Agency Supervisor (if applicable)* Title (*Complete separate evaluation) Student Placement Year □ BSW □ MSW - Foundation □ MSW - Concentration Using the scale below, please rate your satisfaction with the Field Instructor’s fulfillment of the following objectives: 1 2 3 4 5 NA Very Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very Satisfied Not Applicable The Field Instructor: 1. provided student with a comprehensive orientation to the programs and policies of the practicum setting. 2. provided student with a thorough description of her/his roles, responsibilities, and assignments within the agency. 3. in collaboration with the student, completed the Learning Contract in a timely manner (2-3 weeks) following the student’s start date at agency. 4. in collaboration with the student, completed and submitted the end of semester evaluations in a timely manner. 5. was accessible (by phone, email, or in person) for periodic consultation regarding the student. 6. was prepared for the scheduled site visits. 7. provided constructive feedback to the student via process recordings and supervision. 8. was receptive to suggestions, comments, feedback (from student and Field Liaison) regarding the Field Practicum environment and assignments. 9. provided the student with clearly stated objectives, tasks and assignments in a consistent and timely manner. 10. provided the student with weekly supervision conducted in a consistent professional and ethical manner. 11. established positive dialogue with student to encourage option communication. 179 1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 NA NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA The Field Practicum site and Field Instructor exposed the student to the following learning experiences: 1. Ability to function within a variety of social work roles: advocate, broker, educator, enabler, and 2. mediator. Availability to shadow a current social worker and other staff for an interdisciplinary and collaborative experience. to observe, take part in, and/or facilitate 3. Opportunity group work and engage in macro practice assignments (BSW- Foundation Year) Advanced practice assignments (Concentration Year). 4. Exposure to a diverse array of appropriate generalist practice assignments. (BSW –Foundation Year only) 5. Development of leadership skills, interprofessional, and collaborative approaches and practice. 6. The experiences in this field placement helped the student master the Core Competencies 1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA Faculty Field Liaison’s Feedback: Summarize your observations/assessment of Practicum Site and Field Instructor Strengths. As appropriate, identify areas for improvement and potential for partnership expansion: Recommendation □ I recommend the continued use of this agency and Field Instructor as a Field Practicum site □ I recommend continued use of this practicum with a change in: □ Field Instructor □ Department □ Other □ I recommend that Wheelock reevaluate the appropriateness of this setting as a Field Practicum site for our students. Additional Comments Faculty Field Liaison’s Signature: Date Print Name: Date 180 Wheelock College – Field Practicum EVALUATION OF FACULTY FIELD LIAISON - FIELD INSTRUCTOR Purpose: To provide evaluation of the Faculty Field Liaison Filled out by: Field Instructor Submitted to: Social Work Field Education Office Name of Faculty Field Liaison: Date: Field Practicum site: This evaluation is being completed by: □ Field Instructor □ Agency Supervisor 1. How useful were your meetings with the Wheelock Faculty Field Liaison and student? □ Not Useful □ Somewhat Useful □ Useful □ Very Useful □ Extremely Useful Explain/Comments: 2. To what extend did the Faculty Field Liaison provide you with the information and support necessary for you to meet Wheelock's expectations for field instruction? □ No Extent □ Little Extent □ Some Extent □ Considerable Extent □ Great Extent Explain/Comments: 3. How available was the Faculty Field Liaison to you by phone, email and/or in person for consultation when you needed answers, suggestions, etc. □ Not Available □ Somewhat Available □ Available □ Very Available □ Extremely Available Explain/Comments: 4. What do you think of the frequency of site visits by the Faculty Field Liaison? □ Too Many Visits □ Not Enough Visits □ Just Right Explain/Comments: 5. To what extent was the Faculty Field Liaison prepared for the site visits with you and the student? □ Not Prepared □ Somewhat Prepared □ Prepared □ Very Prepared □ Extremely Prepared Explain/Comments: 181 6. What suggestions do you have for improving communication between you and Wheelock's Social Work Program? 7. How could we better prepare our students for their Field Placements? Please check all that apply: □ This was my first time supervising a social work student □ This was my first time supervising a Wheelock College social work student □ I attended the Fall 2014 Field Instructor Orientation □ I did not attend the Field Instructor Orientation in Fall 2014 but have attended in the past □ I have completed the Seminar in Field Instruction (SIFI) for first time MSW supervisors 8. Please provide any other suggestions, thoughts, reflections or comments on any aspect of our Field Education program. All thoughts are appreciated. 182 Wheelock College – Field Practicum SUMMARY OF STUDENT PRACTICUM EXPERIENCE - FACULTY FIELD LIAISON Purpose: Provide an end-of-semester summary of student progress in field placement and seminar class. Summary will inform future field practicum placement and is required input for Faculty Advisors and/or Program Chair references. Filled out by: Faculty Field Liaison Submitted to: Social Work Field Education Office Date: Name of Student: Year: □BSW □MSW Foundation □ MSW Concentration Semester: □Fall □Spring Course Number: Grade: □ Pass □ Marginal Pass* □ Pass with Excellence Student who receive a Marginal Pass must be informed of this and a documented plan for improvement should be attached to this Summary of Student Practicum Experience Please include the following information in a one page narrative summary: Name of Practicum Agency Name of Field Instructor and Agency Supervisor Description of student assignments and learning activities Summary of Progress on assignments and learning activities Additional comments on student performance (include quotes from Field Instructor) Comment on student’s performance in Seminar class Goals for next semester (or future practice if student is graduating) Statement of successful practicum completion as part of the requirements for the BSW or MSW degree, if accomplished Printed Name of Faculty Field Liaison: Signature of Faculty Field Liaison: Field Office will distribute copies to: □ Program Chair □ Faculty Advisor □ Future Faculty Field Liaison 183 2014 – 2015 Important Social Work Field EDUCATION Dates It is the responsibility of each student to make arrangements with their field placement site regarding their schedule. This includes planning in advance for holidays, inclement weather, and school breaks. Fall Semester Field Instructor Orientation - Worcester Program Field Instructor Orientation - Boston Program BSW Field Placement Begins MSW Foundation Year Field Placements Begin MSW Concentration Year Field Placements Begin Flexible Field Option Agreement Due Student Internship at Employment Agreement Due BSW - Learning Contracts Due MSW Foundation Year - Learning Contracts Due MSW Concentration Year - Learning Contracts Due Faculty Field Liaison Site Visit #1 Fall Semester Ends All Final Semester Evaluations & Time Reports Due to Faculty Field Liaisons Winter Holiday – College Closed August 20th, 3:30 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. September 4th, 4:00 p.m. – 7:30 p.m. September 8th Week of September 8th Week of September 8th September 12th September 12th September 23rd Boston: September 22nd Worcester: September 17th Boston: September 17th Worcester: October 1st October/November S December 16th December 16th December 24 – January 2nd Spring Semester BSW - Amended Learning Contracts Due February 3rd Faculty Field Liaison Site Visit #2 Faculty Field Liaison Site Visit #3* January/February April/May All Final Semester Time Reports Due to Faculty Field Liaisons May 5th Human Rights Integrative Projects April 24th Commencement May 15th *There will be three Faculty Field Liaison site visits conducted throughout the academic year. During the third site visit, the Faculty Field Liaison will work collaboratively with the student and his/her Field Instructor to complete the end of year evaluation. 184
© Copyright 2024