Academic Emergency Medicine Journal Author Guidelines Read our Peer-Review Policy Advances (educational published research & Procedure research, curriculum planning articles), Media Read our Conflict of Interest and development, and Reviews (solicited book, Policy & Procedure procedural skill training and software, and other media Academic Emergency assessment),Commentaries (so reviews – published online Medicine is the official journal of licited editorial statements, only), Resident the Society for Academic editorials related to the content Portfolios (reflections and Emergency Medicine of the current issue, and introspection of emergency (SAEM). AEM publishes peer- unsolicited opinion pieces not medicine reviewed information relevant to related to the content of the residents), Reflections (humani the practice, educational current issue), The Biros stic essays or photographs), advancement, and investigation Section on Research and Dynamic Emergency of emergency care, including Ethics (original analysis, Medicine (short video (but not limited to): Progressive commentaries, and reviews on productions that provide verbal Clinical Practice (articles that the ethics of research), Special and visual instruction or seek to answer clinical questions Contributions (SAEM policy information). AEM does not through consideration of relevant papers, and narrative publish case reports. clinical evidence or provide an reviews), Research Methods appraisal of existing evidence on and Statistics (descriptions and Academic Emergency a topic pertinent to most explanations of research Medicine publishes both in print emergency physicians - methodologies and statistical and online, and publishing academic and non- techniques), Bench to Bedside, selected papers online-only academic), Original Research Clinical Pathologic allows the editors to conserve Contributions (this combines Conference (published online print space, and take advantage the three previous sections only), Ethics of some of the features that only Basic Investigations, Clinical Seminars, Profiles in Patient electronic publishing can offer. Investigations, and Clinical Safety, Brief Reports (pilot The editorial board will exercise Practice). Possible content studies and methodological its discretion in determining includes: clinical trials, development whether a given submission will observational cohort studies, papers), Evidence-based run in the print journal, or online- other human subject studies, Diagnostics (systematic only in its e-pages. Similarly, the innovative diagnostics and reviews of history, physical editors may choose to run data therapeutics, concept papers, exam, and bedside tests for a supplements, appendices, and clinical controversies,economic single diagnosis), Peer- other text-dense material, as or policy research, health reviewed Lectures well as complex or services research, laboratory (PeRLs) (videos of lectures on supplementary figures, tables, science, basic science studies, topics in emergency and graphs online-only, with and volunteer human non- medicine), Correspondence (let links to the print-version paper. patient studies), Educational ters related to previously MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSION electronically at the AEM online sources, industry relationships, AEM submission requirements submission web etc. correspond with the “Uniform site, http://mc.manuscriptcentral. Authors experiencing any Requirements for Manuscripts com/aemj. Complete guidelines difficulty during the submission Submitted to Biomedical are available at the web site, process or requiring any Journals” (http://www.icmje.org). along with a Manuscript assistance, should contact the We require that clinical trials be Template form. When submitting editorial office at one of the e- registered a manuscript to the online mail addresses listed at the end at http:/www.clinicaltrials.gov or system, authors must provide an of these Author Guidelines. If another nationally recognized electronic version of the authors do not receive an e-mail clinical trials registration system. manuscript. For this purpose confirmation of submission The requirement for clinical trial original source files, not PDF within 24 hours, it may be an registration includes files, are preferred. Submissions indication that the manuscript observational as well as must include: has not been received by the interventional trials, as ● One copy of the complete title editorial office. All discussed on the page correspondence, including the ClinicalTrials.gov web site ● One blinded copy of the editor's decision and request for (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/ manuscript, in which all authors, revisions, will be by e-mail. about-studies/learn#WhatIs) and institutions, and other identifiers Correspondence and questions on the ICMJE “Obligation to from the title page, methods, and regarding the status of review Register Clinical Trials” web site elsewhere throughout the should be directed to (http://www.icmje.org/publishing manuscript have been deleted. the AEMoffice and include the _10register.html), which defines ● All figures and tables assigned manuscript number a clinical trial as “any research ● Any supplemental material for and its title. Manuscripts under project that prospectively online-only publication consideration by another assigns human subjects to ● A completed AEM cover page, publication and/or materials intervention or concurrent including the author previously published elsewhere comparison or control groups to contributions section, available by the authors will not be study the cause-and-effect for download at the website. considered. relationship between a medical ● A completed ICMJE conflicts Copies of similar manuscripts intervention and a health of interest disclosure form for the currently under review or outcome. Authors from nations lead author upon submission previously published elsewhere with no registry or who do not and for each named author upon must be provided. feel their study requires acceptance. Members of a study Accepted manuscripts become registration should contact the group who are not named the permanent property editor-in-chief prior to authors are not required to of AEM and may not be submission. AEM utilizes a web- submit a form. Note: the journal published elsewhere in whole or based manuscript submission may request additional in part without permission from and peer-review system. Authors information from authors, the publisher (Wiley-Blackwell). should submit their manuscripts, beyond what is shown on the MANUSCRIPT PREPARATION with figures and tables, ICMJE form, regarding funding Writing should conform to accepted English usage and reproduced. The sources of Substantial edits may not be syntax. reproduced material must be made at the proofs stage of Avoid the use of slang and acknowledged in the manuscript. production. PREPARATION GUIDELINES medical jargon. All abbreviations should be defined the first time PEER REVIEW General: The editor-in-chief used in the manuscript; obscure AEM uses a blinded peer-review determines the category in which abbreviations should be avoided. process with multiple statistical each manuscript will be Measurements should be given and topic reviewers to evaluate published. Aside from the Brief in standard international units submitted manuscripts. Reports and Correspondence and generic drug names should Submitted manuscripts are formats, AEM does not have be used unless the trade name assigned to the appropriate guidelines regarding article is relevant. associate editor, who assigns length. In general, use as many primary reviewers, collates raw words as needed to present the For authors whose primary reviews of the manuscript, and material in a comprehensive yet language is not English, develops a consensus review. succinct manner. Manuscripts the AEM editorial board offers The consensus review describes are typically too long, not too language editing assistance for the major concerns that arose short. SAEM members, and for authors during the primary review of the from nations that are paper. The consensus review Conflict of Interest and beneficiaries of the HINARI and a decision regarding the Disclosures initiative. Others may take manuscript are sent to the AEM uses the ICMJE advantage of the Wiley- author. standardized conflict of interest Blackwell author services form for author reporting of (http://authorservices.wiley.com/ EDITING potential conflicts. Relevant bauthor/english_language.asp). Acceptance of the manuscript for potential conflicts of interest will Please note: Editing assistance publication is contingent upon be listed in the front matter of the in no way guarantees completion of the editing article. All funding sources must publication. Standard peer process. This includes be disclosed. A completed review processes will be copyediting and a final review by ICMJE conflicts of interest followed for all such papers. the editor-in-chief, who may ask disclosure form must be DUPLICATED MATERIAL for more information or completed for the lead author Written permission from additional revisions, or even upon submission and for each the copyright holder for reverse a previous 'accept' named author upon acceptance. reproduction of figures and decision. Every author is Click here to view the form tables taken from other responsible for all statements and here to view a sample publications must be provided at published in the article, including indicating how it should be filled the time of manuscript the revisions made in the editing out. acceptance. process. After typesetting, the Original Research Permission must be obtained for proofs will be e-mailed to the Contributions both print and electronic corresponding author for routing Original Research Contributions, versions of the material to be to co-authors and final approval. research-related Brief Reports, and Educational Advances members must meet the criteria study should be included here. submissions should contain the for authorship. Identify the When equipment is used in a following sections. Number the members by responsibility or by study, provide in parentheses pages consecutively, and institution on the study group the model number, name, and include the running title as a authorship page. location of the manufacturer. If header. 3. Abstract. The abstract should citing an in-press paper for the contain no more than 500 words. description of methods (i.e. 1. Title Page. The title should not Original research submissions when referencing methods used exceed 50 words. Do not use require a structured abstract that in a prior study, which is abbreviations. List the full defines the Objectives, Methods, currently in press), please names, terminal degrees, and Results, and Conclusions. The upload a copy of the in-press affiliations of all authors or abstract should not include paper for the editor and members of a study group; the references, figures, tables, or reviewers. This in-press material addresses, phone numbers, fax graphs. will be handled with appropriate numbers, and e-mail addresses 4. Introduction. The introduction confidentiality. to which requests for reprints should briefly describe the study Research involving human and author correspondence question, its scope and subjects or animals must meet should be sent; and a short relevance to emergency local legal and institutional running title. If an author’s practice, and the hypothesis requirements and generally affiliation has changed since the and/or objectives of the accepted ethical principles such work was completed, list the new investigation. The reader should as those set out in the and old affiliations. If the work have a very clear understanding Nuremberg Code, the Belmont described in the manuscript has of exactly what the study Report, or the Declaration of been formally presented at a question or objective is after Helsinki. (See Biros MH, scientific meeting or has won a reading the introduction section. Hauswald M, Baren J. presentation award, provide the 5. Methods. The methods should Procedural versus practical name of the organization, date, include subsections with ethics. Acad Emerg Med and location of the meeting. headings that detail the Study 2010;17:989-990 for more Identify financial support of the Design (include human subject information.) investigation or manuscript or animal use committee Manuscripts reporting data development. review), Study Setting and involving human subjects must Describe any financial Population, Study Protocol, indicate a positive review by an arrangements that may Measurements or key outcome Institutional Review Board (IRB) represent conflict of interest. measures, and Data Analysis or equivalent. This requirement Acknowledge individuals who (include sample size includes studies that qualify for have provided assistance or determinations and other IRB expedited status. Most support in the study or relevant information, the names institutions require IRB review of manuscript preparation. of statistical tests, and software studies that qualify for exempt 2. Study Group Authorship used). The role of funding status and that this Page. When authorship is organizations and sponsors in determination be made by the attributed to a study group, all the conduct and reporting of the IRB, not by the authors. The “Methods” section of the Statistical methods used should was blinding successful, was manuscript must explicitly state be defined, and any not in there a high inter-rater that IRB approval was obtained, common use should be reliability?). that the IRB determined the described in detail and/or 7. Discussion. The discussion study was exempt, or that the supported by references. should put the study results in study did not involve human Reporting of randomized the context of current subjects (e.g. publicly available controlled trials must conform to knowledge. An unbiased review and previously de-identified the CONSORT statement and critique of previous relevant information from national data (http://www.consort- studies should be included and sets, or other studies not statement.org/) and include a appropriately referenced. meeting the definition of human flow chart describing patient 8. Limitations. Discuss subjects research as set forth in progress throughout the trial. shortcomings and biases related US Code of Federal Resuscitation studies should to study design and execution. Regulations, Title 45, Part 46 – follow the applicable Utstein Highlight areas where future additional information available criteria when appropriate. We investigations and/or different at www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/cdeb support consensus-based methods of analysis might prove iol.html). The “Methods” section methodologic standards for other fruitful. should also indicate the type of study types, including the 9. Conclusions. The conclusions consent used (written, verbal, or MOOSE standards for meta- should not simply repeat the waived), and confirm that analyses of observational results, but rather answer the consent was obtained from all studies, the PRISMA standards study question. subjects (unless waived by the for systematic reviews and other Recommendations supported by IRB). types of meta-analyses, the the study findings may be Manuscripts reporting the results STARD statement on studies of included. of investigations of live diagnostic tests, and the 10. References. Citations and vertebrate animals must indicate STROBE statement on references should be listed in approval by an Animal Care and observational epidemiologic numerical order. Every reference Use Committee or equivalent. studies. Authors are encouraged must be cited at least once in the We reserve the right to request to adhere to these whenever text. Use the NEJM reference submission of IRB or Animal possible. style: all authors up to six, article Care and Use Committee 6. Results. Results should be title (and subtitle, if any), journal documentation at any time. concisely stated and include the name (with no following period), Authors with any questions or statistical analysis of the data year, volume number (and issue concerns, particularly those from presented. Results presented in number if the journal's pages are countries that have different tabular or graphic form should not numbered consecutively requirements for approval, be referred to in the text, but the throughout the year), and should contact Dr. Mark material should not be presented inclusive page numbers. Hauswald, Senior Associate again. In addition to the data (Examples a and b below) When Editor for Global Emergency collected in the study, the results there are seven or more authors, Medicine, should also indicate the success list the first three, followed by “et at markhauswald@gmail.com. of protocol implementation (e.g., al.” (Example c below) Book references should include: b. Wagner EH, Sandhu N, (e.g., *) must also be defined in authors as above, chapter title, if Newton KM, McCulloch DK, a footnote. any, editor, if any, title of book, Ramsey SD, Grothaus LC. 12. Figures and legends. Figures city of publication, publisher, and Effect of improved glycemic must be referenced in the text in year. Include volume and control on health care costs and sequential order. Figures should edition, specific pages, and utilization. JAMA 2001;285:182- clarify and augment the text. Put translators where appropriate. 9. figure legends on a separate (Example d below) Website c. Shapiro AMJ, Lakey JRT, page. Figures in PDF are not of references should include the Ryan EA, et al. Islet acceptable quality for most recent date of access. transplantation in seven patients publication. Photographs must (Example e below) Personal with type 1 diabetes mellitus be submitted electronically communications and using a glucocorticoid-free according to the following unpublished data should be cited immunosuppressive regimen. N specifications: color photographs in the body of the paper in Engl J Med 2000;343:230-8. should be saved as TIF files in parentheses, not listed in the d. Goadsby PJ. Pathophysiology RGB at a minimum of 12.5 cm (5 references section. Manuscripts of headache. In: Silberstein SD, in.) in width at 300 dpi; black and that have been accepted for Lipton RB, Dalessio DJ, eds. white photographs should be publication may be listed as “in Wolff's headache and other head saved as TIF files in grayscale at press”; manuscripts that have pain. 7th ed. Oxford, England: a minimum of 12.5 cm (5 in.) in been submitted or are under Oxford University Press, width at 300 dpi. Figure revision but have not been 2001:57-72. reproduction cannot improve on accepted may not be cited as e. Centers for Medicare & the quality of the originals. Any references. The use of abstracts Medicaid Services, U.S. special instructions about sizing, that have not been published as Department of Health and placement, or color should be full manuscripts is discouraged. Human Services. CMS clearly noted. Symbols, arrows, Please do not capitalize each proposals to implement certain or letters used to identify parts of word in a reference title – only disclosure provisions of the the illustration must be explained capitalize the first letter unless Affordable Care Act. clearly in the legend. If a figure there is a proper noun or other http://www.cms.gov/apps/media/ has been previously published, word clearly needing press/factsheet.asp?Counter=42 the legend must acknowledge capitalization in the title. Authors 21. Accessed January 30, 2012. the original source. The ability to are responsible for the accuracy 11. Tables. Tables should be reproduce figures and and completeness of the created using the table tool in photographs in color is limited, references and text citations. MS Word. Tables must be and at the discretion of the Examples: referenced in the text in editor-in-chief. Line drawings a. Cone DC. Knowledge sequential order. Each table and graphs are not published in translation in the emergency should be submitted on a color, and color should not be medical services: a research separate page with a descriptive used to differentiate data in agenda for advancing title. Define all abbreviations in a these. In some circumstances, prehospital care. Acad Emerg footnote to the table. Symbols color figures and photographs Med 2007;14:1052-7. related to the table contents may be published. Brief Reports are aware of other papers should be reported in these Brief Reports related to research underway from that same analyses, including interval efforts should be formatted as in conference's research agenda, likelihood ratios for continuous the general methods listed they are encouraged to data. Test-treatment thresholds above. However, brief reports coordinate submission with the should be defined using the should not exceed 1,500 words, authors of those other papers. methods of Pauker and Kassirer. and should contain no more than Contact: Gary Gaddis, MD, PhD The discussion section should 10 references and no more than (ggaddis@saint-lukes.org) include a succinct summary of one table or figure. The title Evidence-based Diagnostics implications for future diagnostic page and AEM cover page Submissions to this section seek research within this field. All should follow the format listed to answer diagnostic clinical articles in this series undergo above. Case reports will not be questions on a single topic standard blinded peer review. considered and case series are pertinent to most emergency Authors are encouraged to generally assigned a low priority physicians using a diagnostic contact the section editor with for publication. systematic review. An any specific questions regarding Consensus Conference appropriate report would seek to submission to this section. Follow-Up Manuscripts promote the use of information Contact: Christopher R. Submissions in any category drawn from previous high quality Carpenter, MD (Original Research diagnostically-focused clinical (carpenterc@wusm.wustl.edu) Contributions, Brief Reports, etc) research upon the routine Non-research Educational that describe research that was clinical practice of emergency Advances and Special initiated to address a research medicine. Search methods Contributions agenda topic generated at one should be explicit and These submissions should of the priorAcademic Emergency reproducible. These submissions include a non-structured Medicine consensus should use at least two abstract, an introduction, conferences should be identified investigators to rate the discussion, and conclusions or a as such in the cover letter that evidence quality using summary statement. The title accompanies the manuscript, the Quality Assessment Tool for page and AEM cover page when the manuscript is Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. should follow the format listed submitted for review. Authors Heterogeneity should be above. A blinded copy is should state to which consensus assessed and meta-analysis required. conference the manuscript performed, when applicable. relates, and should also state Disease prevalence in Ethics Seminars/Profiles in which issue(s) discussed or emergency medicine populations Patient Safety raised at that consensus presenting with the suspected Ethics Seminars and Profiles in conference is/are addressed by condition should be defined via Patient Safety should include a the manuscript. Attempts will be the literature review. Diagnostic brief case presentation, a made to publish consensus accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, discussion of relevant principles conference follow-up likelihood ratios) for history, and concepts related to the manuscripts as a group, rather physical exam, bedside tests, case, and a discussion of their than individually, and if authors and relevant imaging studies application. Discussion of innovative concepts, new in the acute care setting, and medicine (EBM) reviews observations, and analysis of ethical analysis of existing or (click here for instructions on approaches to solving dilemmas potential guidelines are invited. structured EBM reviews). All are encouraged. A Protecting research subjects articles in this series undergo comprehensive review of the during investigations conducted standard blinded peer review. subject is not required. Citations under emergent circumstances Authors are encouraged to are encouraged, but are limited is a priority focus. AEM is contact the section editor with to 15. dedicated to advancing the any specific questions regarding science of the specialty, and submission to this section. Bench to Bedside manuscripts that help shape, Contact: Alan E. Jones, MD Articles for this series should advance, enable, and improve (aejones@umc.edu) include a brief abstract the way that research is Educational Advances describing the purpose of the conducted will be considered for Authors are encouraged to article and a brief overview of this section. Submissions should submit educational advances the topic. The usual instructions follow existing guidelines, while both as original research regarding structured methods mentioning the Biros Section on manuscripts and non-research section do not apply, but the Research Ethics in the cover educational advances. Research manuscript should include a letter. Contact: James G. advances should follow the section that specifically Adams, MD (jadams@njm.org) journal guidelines above for discusses the topic from the Progressive Clinical Practice original research articles. Non- perspective of its role in Articles in this section seek to research educational advances emergency medicine research answer clinical questions should include a non-structured and clinical practice. Other through consideration of relevant abstract, an introduction, guidelines for format and style clinical evidence, or provide an discussion, and conclusion(s) or are consistent with those listed appraisal of existing evidence on a summary statement. Studies in the general author guidelines. a topic pertinent to most that assess changes in behavior emergency physicians - and practice and benefit to The Biros Section on academic and non-academic. An patients from the educational Research Ethics appropriate report would seek to intervention (higher on the The journal invites submissions promote the use of information modified Kirkpatrick for the ongoing Biros Section on drawn from previous clinical hierarchy,http://www.facs.org/ed Research Ethics. Original research in the routine clinical ucation/technicalskills/kirkpatrick analysis, commentaries, and practice of emergency medicine. /kirkpatrick.html) are preferred to reviews are invited. The goal is Examples of appropriate formats those that assess learner to advance the practical issues for this section include (but are participation, satisfaction, and philosophical thinking not limited to): systematic attitudes, and perceptions. related to research in emergency reviews, meta-analyses, Authors may wish to consult the medicine. comprehensive topical reviews following two articles for Investigator experiences with evidence grading, clinical information regarding principles regarding patient consent, scenarios with limited evidence, and methodologies of high- original insights about research and structured evidence-based quality education research: Kessler C, Burton JH. Moving related topics will also be editorials are occasionally beyond confidence and considered. Manuscript published, and submissions competence: education submissions should target should include a title page and outcomes research in clinicians and other end-users, acknowledgment page, similar to emergency medicine. Acad with a goal of promoting mastery that described above. Emerg Med 2011;18:S25. Yarris of an increasingly complex Unsolicited submissions should LM, Deiorio NM. Education scientific literature and be limited to 10 double-spaced research: a primer for educators enhancing the conduct of high- pages and include no more than in emergency medicine. Acad quality emergency care 10 appropriate references. Emerg Med 2011;18:S27. research. Articles describing Correspondence Contact: John H. Burton, MD applied methodology are All letters that comment on a (jhburton@carilionclinic.org) encouraged, with use of relevant published work must be received clinical examples, sample data, by the end of the month Research Methods and and sample statistical code (e.g., following publication (e.g., by the Statistics available through an online end of December for letters As the biomedical research appendix), as appropriate. commenting on material from the enterprise becomes increasingly Manuscripts simply expanding November issue). Letters should complex, investigators who and detailing the methods be no longer than 500 words, perform studies and clinicians section of another study are with no more than five who incorporate research discouraged. Organization of the references. An editorial decision findings into clinical practice may manuscript is flexible, but should regarding acceptance of the benefit from literature that be appropriate to the technique letter will be made after the describes and explains the or methodology being described, author of the related work has applied use of these methods. and should typically be had the opportunity to review the Submissions to this section instructional in format, rather letter and comment. Letters should address innovations in than using the traditional regarding current issues in methodology that can facilitate manuscript headings academic aspects of emergency the conduct of research in (Introduction, Methods, Results, medicine, but not related to a emergency medicine, or provide Conclusions). We suggest published work, are also new insights into the critical reviewing the format and content encouraged. Research studies appraisal of studies that address of previous “Advanced Statistics” will not be accepted as the interpretation, evaluation, or publications in AEM for correspondence. No tables or application of research into formatting examples. Contact: graphs should accompany practice. Acceptable Craig D. Newgard, MD, MPH letters to the editor. submissions of particular interest (newgardc@ohsu.edu) Contributions must otherwise to researchers can cover the Commentaries conform to the relevant gamut from study design to In most circumstances, manuscript submission novel or complex analytic commentaries are solicited and guidelines. The editors reserve methods to standards for the the author will be provided with the right to edit the length of reporting of clinical research, appropriate information. letters, and the number of letters though additional methods Unsolicited opinion pieces or published on a given subject. In general, after publication of editor. Contact: Peter E. A Clinical Pathologic Conference letters and the author reply (if Sokolove, MD (CPC) manuscript describes the any), further letters on the same (pesokolove@ucdavis.edu) logical systematic evaluation and subject will not be considered. diagnosis of a clinical case as it General tips on writing letters to Dynamic Emergency Medicine unfolds in the emergency the editor can be found at: Golub Videos of interest to our readers department. An effective CPC RM. Correspondence are published in this online-only case illustrates the typical course. JAMA 2008; 300:98-99. section of the journal. Each presentation of an uncommon Contact: Jeffrey A. Kline, MD submission must be disease or the unusual (jeff.kline@carolinashealthcare.o accompanied by a brief written presentation of a common rg) description of the video contents. disease. We invite all Reflections Examples of acceptable content participants of the Annual CPC The Reflections section include the demonstration of a Competition sponsored by publishes essays, poetry, procedure, an overview of a CORD/EMRA/ACEP/SAEM to reflective writing, and creative disease process, an interview submit their cases for photographs. The general author with an author, and any other publication. CPC cases not guidelines listed above should creative or professional presented at the Annual be applied for any text presentation of useful Competition will also be submitted. There is a limit of 600 Emergency Medicine-related considered. The manuscript words, and shorter works that content. In general, case reports format should mirror the format can be used as filler on partial with short video clips (such as of the CPC competition: case pages are preferred. In most ultrasound) will not be presentation, discussion of the circumstances, photographs will considered for publication. differential diagnosis, and case be accepted only in black and Videos should not exceed ten resolution. All accepted white. Each photo should be minutes in length, and will manuscripts are published as titled, and should contain a brief undergo peer review. The online-only articles. Contact: legend. If the photo includes preferred formats are Apple Mark B. Mycyk, MD identifiable patients, health care QuickTime, MPEG or Windows (mycyk.md@gmail.com) providers, or other individuals, Media. Please submit through Resident Portfolios permission must be obtained to the online website as any other Manuscripts of reflections and publish them in the journal. submission. Upload the video as introspection of experiences Reflections are published on a "supplemental materials for encountered by emergency space-available basis. Contact: online publication." The section medicine residents during their Brian Zink, MD editor will contact you if there are training are invited. Submissions (bzink@lifespan.org) file size, quality, or compatibility should be no more than five issues with the video you submit. pages, with no more than 15 Media Reviews Contact: Scott Joing, MD references, and may include one Media reviews are, in general, (sjoing@mac.com) table or figure. Patient and solicited, and information colleague confidentiality must be regarding these can be obtained Clinical Pathologic assured. An abstract that places directly from the department Conference (CPC) the experience into a professional development Des Plaines, IL 60018 high level of educational content context and a “take home” point Tel: 847-813-9823 for an audience of practicing are required. Portfolios may Fax: 847-813-5450 emergency physicians. Video undergo invited commentary saem@saem.org content should enhance the from individuals with expertise in practice of emergency medicine the identified area of discussion. PeRLs Author Guidelines by rendering additional insight, These commentaries will be a Introduction data, or expertise to the maximum of two pages and will Academic Emergency audience. General core focus on “learning points.” Medicinepublishes selected curriculum reviews for Primary authors must be videos of lectures on topics in emergency medicine topics will emergency medicine residents emergency medicine. These are not be accepted for review. or reflect an experience intended to represent the state Videos should contain both the encountered in the residency of the art in EM education. presented AV materials for the training environment by an Residents, practicing physicians, lectures (such as PowerPoint emergency medicine graduate. and medical students may use slides) and live video of the Contact: Carey D. Chisholm, MD them for didactic education. presenter. Each video lecture (cchisholm@clarian.com) Prospective authors should should contain the following Contacts consider contacting the PeRLs information: Editor-in-Chief Editorial Board for a discussion - A written abstract describing David C. Cone, MD before starting video production the content of the lecture editor@saem.org of a lecture for a determination - Lecture title, author, and Tel: 203-785-4710 of topic suitability. Videos can be institutional affiliation on a title Fax: 203-785-3196 complex to produce, and given slide the effort involved, having a - Conflict of interest statement Journal Manager discussion with an editor either - A brief overview of the lecture Sandra K. Arjona by e-mail or phone before content (~1 minute) sandrak.arjona@gmail.com producing the video is - The body of the lecture ( 30 Tel: 412-772-1190 recommended. Prior discussion minutes) Fax: 412-772-1190 with an editor does not - References and further reading guarantee the likelihood of (~30 seconds) Technical Editor acceptance for a submitted - Contact information for Kathleen G. Seal video. However, it is the goal for questions Please note that brand Kgseal@saem.org or an advance discussion to names should not be shown in Kgseal@comcast.net optimize the potential submitted these lectures unless clearly Tel: 612-824-3805 x.1 material. relevant to the discussion. Fax: 612-929-2603 GENERAL INFORMATION Content Outline Society Office PeRLs is designed to provide It is strongly recommended that Society for Academic state-of-the-art educational prior to recording a video, Emergency Medicine material in emergency medicine. authors submit a lecture outline 2340 S. River Road, Suite 208 The content should represent a to the PeRLS editorial board for review. The outline should be videos submitted separately. regarding the topic being submitted with relevant Consent presented on a slide after the accompanying visuals (video When using images of patients title slide. and graphics that are a central and staff, either the subjects portion of the lecture) as should not be identifiable, or Lecture appropriate. their pictures must be The lecture should be produced The outline will form part of the accompanied by written as a split screen with two views: review process by both the permission to use the material. one of the lecture slides (e.g. editors and peer-reviewers, and Original Material PowerPoint), and one of the the editor will respond to the The authors must ensure that all presenter. Slide resolution authors with recommendations video, graphics, and audio should be adequate to make text regarding proceeding with portions of submitted work are easily readable, usually equal to recording. In the event that a original. Written permission is or larger than the video of the video has already been recorded needed for figures, tables, and presenter. Timing of the slide (e.g. a recording is made at a other material that is borrowed changes in the video should regional conference and it is or adapted from other works, match the actual changes used later decided to submit it for using the same process as by the presenter during the consideration), please indicate permission for re-use of material lecture. this in the cover letter. in a regular journal article. Permission can either be listed There are many ways to produce Written Abstract on the appropriate slide a high-quality split screen video A written abstract should be (preferable), or on a separate presentation of a lecture. Timing submitted with the video. The slide at the end of the of the slide changes can be abstract should provide an presentation. accomplished by capturing the overview of the lecture content. Journal Style slides real-time with a VGA The text is limited to 350 words, Academic Emergency grabber such as those made by and it will be published online Medicine has created a template Epiphan (epiphan.com) and and made available through for consistent video various recording software. Post- PubMed and other search presentation, abstract, title slide, production editing can be engines. The intent for the disclosures / conflict of interest reduced by using real-time abstract is to give the potential (COI) slide, introduction slide, layering/recording software such viewer enough information to body of presentation, reference as Boinx TC (boinx.com). know whether he or she wishes slide, contact information, and Another way to accomplish slide to view the video. concluding slide, as well as capture is by using screen Video Length disclaimer and copyright casting software such as The lecture should be limited to information. It is recommended ScreenFlow by Telestream 30 minutes. If more time is that authors review this template (telestream.net). Final Cut Pro required, this should be prior to beginning production. (or any other video editing discussed with the editor. A Disclosure Statement software) can be used to longer lecture can be Author must disclose any combine two video sources restructured as several shorter potential conflicts of interest (slides and video of the presenter) into one video, with the intent to arrange for the available, the Progressive Scan though syncing the slide production of a higher quality option in the camera should be changes with the video of the product if advised by the journal enabled. If the video footage presenter requires more time reviewers/editor following the was not shot with progressive and editing work than real-time initial review of the lower quality, scan, the video needs to be de- capture of the slide changes. PeRLS-specific submission. interlaced when compressed. Video filming opportunities may The lecture should be presented be arranged with a PeRLS Lighting with a well-paced clear voice, editor. These opportunities can It is important that there is free of excessive accenting or be scheduled with Academic adequate lighting on the dialect, using conversational Emergency Medicine editorial presenter. Overhead lights are inflections. Acronyms and board support at regional or not always sufficient. Often, a eponyms should be defined and national emergency medicine light at 45 degrees from the used carefully. Acronyms are conferences (e.g. SAEM Annual lecturer provides superior generally appropriate only when Meeting). lighting than overhead lights. Direct light may cause the they are immediately recognizable by our readership Slides lecturer to squint, and can cause (such as ED for Emergency The editorial board recommends unwanted reflection from Department). The addition of PowerPoint slides, with a plain hardware. Ensure the lights are natural sounds such as heart font such as Sans-Seriff, Times not in the camera frame beat, bedside monitor, voices, NewRoman, or Helvetica, 32 (practice a pan / zoom before etc. should remain subtle. point type, with a clear color recording). contrast. Avoid red type or large Sound Videos should be original and areas of red in charts, graphs, or Typically, camera-mounted produced for the purposes of a illustrations. Avoid different microphones are of poor quality PeRLS submission. Video filmed colored backgrounds between and will pick up the machine for the purposes of a slides or changes in font within noise of the camera and the conference, grand rounds, or the lecture. operator. External microphones other separate activity will not be Camera are preferred. A camera that considered for review or We recommend using a high- allows an external microphone to acceptance. Video filmed for quality digital camera. be attached can be used, or other purposes may be Movement reduces image sound can be directly captured submitted as part of an outline quality. Strategies to reduce using an external microphone for concept consideration. movement include the use of a into the computer running the However, the final video tripod and minimizing movement video capture software. Consider submitted for review across the frame, including using a lavaliere microphone on consideration must be produced shadows or moving items the lecturer. This is a solely for the purposes of the outside a window. Zooming and microphone that attaches to the PeRLS category. An author with panning should be avoided or clothing. Ensure that the limited high-quality video access limited. In particular, panning microphone wire is not in may submit a lower quality video should occur horizontally only. If camera view. Graphics & Illustrations submitted video material are private noncommercial purposes All graphics should be clear and expected to sign copyright only; it may not be transmitted, legible. Avoid brand names or statements at the time of review distributed, republished, or use of acronyms when possible. to assure copyright permission broadcast without the prior Review spelling and grammar and protection. written permission of the Society carefully as these cannot be Review Process for Academic Emergency edited in post-production. Submitted lectures will be Medicine. Edits subject to peer and editorial Source Video In-camera effects such as low- review. Each video and the Submissions should be made via light gain, strobe, or in-camera associated abstract will be ManuscriptCentral dissolves and post-production reviewed by at least two external (mc.manuscriptcentral.com/aemj dissolves, fades, wipes, spins, peer reviewers before ) with abstract, cover letter and and transitions should be acceptance. related materials with a link to avoided. Straight cuts or edits Disclaimer the uploaded video. Videos must are preferred. In general, the be uploaded to Vimeo.com for following recommendations Professional Judgment viewing by editors and apply: -cut from wide angle to This video is intended solely for reviewers. All video content must close-up, -cut after all movement informational purposes and to be viewable through Vimeo.com has stopped -use dissolves for supplement, not replace, proper with no exceptions. Authors time-lapse or to make an edit training and supervision by must establish an account at from one close-up shot to qualified instructors. Medicine is Vimeo.com with enabled sharing another close-up shot. Citation an ever-changing field; viewers via password-protected access. Accepted lecture videos will be are advised to check the most Password and a link to the cited in PubMed, referencing the current information provided by account should then be provided issue and an e-page number. the manufacturer for every in the cover letter at the time of The presentation will be device being used and to verify submission in published online with its abstract the indications, ManuscriptCentral. Uploaded and a link to the video file. contraindications, and proper videos should be complete, in as Copyright procedural technique. The dose, high a resolution as possible, Accepted videos become the method of administration, and and submitted as uncompressed property of, and are protected contraindications for any files. Video editing is the by, the copyright of Academic administered drug should be responsibility of the author.. Emergency Medicine, which is confirmed before use. held by the Society for Academic Copyright Slide The following format is Emergency Medicine. However, Copyright © [year date of authors of videos may use their publication] Society for own videos for their own in- Academic Emergency Medicine. house purposes without Except as otherwise permitted requesting permission from the by United States copyright law, recommended: Digital video format: Compression CODEC: Frame Size (at least): Frame Rate: Interlace: journal or the society. Co- this video may be viewed, authors and all participants in reproduced, and stored for To allow viewers with slower connection to view video files, Quicktime (MO MPEG4 or H.26 1280x720 prefer 29.97 (native fra De-Interlaced (i the files will be converted to the following formats for viewing: - Flash environment (with captioning, and chapter controls), - Quicktime (broadband and dialup connections), and - Windows Media (broadband and dialup connections)