Download Report

1
InspectThis!
Fall 2014
Supplement to CoatingsPro Magazine
Fall 2014
The Role of the Coating Inspector
By Malcolm McNeil, CIP Committee Chair
T
h ere has been
much discussion
in the coatings
industry as to what
the role of the coating
inspector is. The definition will vary in different
countries around the
world. The definition will also vary within
any country depending on whom you ask.
The NACE International Coating
Inspector Program (CIP) defines the role of
the coatings inspector as that of a “quality
control technician” who is primarily
responsible for observing and reporting the
technical aspects of a coating project and its
conformance or deviation from the project
specification. CIP goes on to say that the
general duties of the inspector are:
•Observe
•Test
• Verify conformance to specification (with
documentation)
•Report
We hear the terms “quality control” and
“quality assurance” in explaining the role of
the inspector. Often these terms are used
interchangeably, but do they mean the same
thing? Let’s take a look and see if we can
get some clarification. Webster’s Dictionary
defines “quality” as “character with respect
to fineness or grade of excellence.” One
of the definitions in the dictionary for
“control” is “to test and verify.” We find
the definition of “assurance” as “a positive
declaration intended to give confidence.”
Based upon these definitions we could say
that the coating inspector does some of both
quality control (for example, taking dry film
thickness measurements) and quality assurance (for example, reporting that the work
is in compliance with the specification).
We are taught that it is the responsibility of
the coating inspector to observe the work
and perform required tests to determine
whether or not the contractor’s work is in
compliance with the specification. Some
people will call this “quality control” and
some people will call it “quality assurance.”
Whatever we call it, the coating inspector
must be clear on what his or her responsibilities and authority are for every project. If this
is not spelled out in the specification, the
coating inspector should ask for a clarification
at the pre-job conference. If there is no pre-job
conference, the coating inspector should
get clarification from whomever they are
reporting to on the project. Everyone on the
project should be aware of what the coating
inspector’s responsibilities and authority are.
As pointed out previously, these can vary
depending on the geographical location of the
project. In some countries the coating inspector is expected to direct the workers. Many
Everyone on the project should be
aware of what the coating inspector’s
responsibilities and authority are.
consider this to be project management rather
than quality control or quality assurance.
In summary, the role of the coating
inspector should be defined on each individual project. It is critical that the coating
inspector accept only work for which he or
she has the required training and qualifications to perform. As inspectors we must
understand clearly what our responsibilities
and authority are for each project. Each of
us who are NACE certified signed an attestation when we took our exams.
It is a good idea to review that attestation from time to time to keep it fresh in our
minds.!
IN THIS ISSUE...
From the Chairman........................................ 1
Coating Failures—
A Coating Supplier’s Perspective........ 2
Inspection and Training: Variables
Involved in Quality Control.................. 5
2014 Knobloch Scholarship Recipients
Announced.................................................. 6
Get This!............................................................. 7
NACE Coatings Course Schedule............ 8
Coatings Resources..................................... 10
2
InspectThis!
Fall 2014
Coating Failures—A Coating Supplier’s
Perspective
By Russell Spotten, Corrosion Probe, Inc.
A
s a 30-year veteran of the coatings
industry, I have seen just about
everything that could go wrong
on a project. These problems have been
caused by any number of factors, including contractor error, bad specifications,
improper product selection, Mother Nature,
etc. This article will discuss a few incidents
where the manufacturer was the primary
cause for a problem project.
Rework
One of the persistent problems
confronting coating manufacturers is
managing inventory. Raw material and
finished goods inventories have a tendency
to balloon out of control if not actively
managed. Ideally, most of the finished
goods in the system are salable, and this
inventory moves over time. There is a
certain amount of product, however, that
never gets sold and must be disposed of.
Reasons for this non-moving stock include
obsolete products, stock exceeding its shelf
life, mistinted paint, returned or damaged
goods, and just plain bad production
batches that can never be sold. A key inventory management process is “rework.”
Manufacturers try very hard not to
dispose of paint. It is expensive to dispose
of paint properly and lawfully. From a
financial viewpoint, it is bad enough that
the manufacturer has sunk all the costs into
the original product, and then has to suffer
additional costs to dispose of the paint.
Rework of this unsalable material into new
batches of paint is one way to get rid of
this “waste” as well as generate some sales
revenue in the process.
Rework is not always a bad thing and,
when done properly, can reduce the amount
of hazardous waste. Many large paint
companies take pride in their sustainable
manufacturing processes, which strive to
eliminate or minimize the hazardous waste
stream. Finished batches of paint where
rework has been used are run through all
of the quality control (QC) processes and
must pass all performance tests required for
the original formulas. Therefore, from the
customer’s point of view, there should be no
difference in batches produced with new raw
materials or with rework materials added.
Rework during paint manufacturing,
however, can sometimes lead to very interesting problems.
Black is Not a Color
As a sales manager for a large coating
company, I had handled many customer
calls and was always anxious to be of
help—especially with complaints. On one
occasion, a complaint call came to my
desk that had me completely stumped. The
owner of a barge coating company, and a
longtime valued customer, called to say
Fall 2014
that the black epoxy coating they had just
purchased from us was not, in fact, black.
Worse than that, his crews had just finished
spraying a complete barge exterior hull with
our product, and the barge owner was very
unhappy with the unsightly, ruddy brownish-black finish color.
How could it be possible that our black
epoxy was not black? Surely the painter must
have done something on his end to have
caused such a problem, or perhaps there was
some other environmental issue that caused
the complaint. Or, maybe it was a mislabeled
batch of epoxy of a different color. While
mislabeling is rare, it can happen. I knew from
experience that all of our black products were
manufactured with black pigments, and color
controls were a part of each and every batch
ticket and QC tests. Or so I thought.
When I discussed this complaint
with the plant QC manager, he just stared
at me for a few moments and then said,
“There is no color control requirement
in this product’s formula or batch ticket.”
My initial thought was, so what. Black is
always black, isn’t it? Or at least it should
be close to black. But no, the QC manager
was steadfast in his stance that this formula
for “black” epoxy was not color controlled. I
guess that in his view, this black epoxy could
be almost any color since there were no QC
tests to tell him otherwise.
Rework was the culprit in this case.
Upon further investigation, the only color
for this epoxy coating that did not have color
controls as part of the batch ticket was black.
Therefore, if any rework of this same formula
epoxy coating needed to be disposed of, it was
added to a fresh batch of black epoxy. The
resultant color of these batches with rework
was usually “mostly” black, but depending
on the quantity and color of rework added,
this product would sometimes turn out to be
a ruddy greyish brownish color, which was
nowhere near black.
I learned an expensive lesson from this
complaint, and a complete review of color
controls and QC tests was conducted for all
products.
Not All Polyurethanes Are Created Equal
Those who follow the paint and
coatings industry closely know that merger
and acquisition activity has increased
dramatically over the last 25 years. In the
early 1990s, I witnessed one of the larger
acquisitions in the North American coatings
market, which saw both the combining of
InspectThis!
3
some very large businesses, as well as the
paint the senior management had agreed to
divesting of others. One of these divest- take. In total, 5,000 gal (~19,000 L)—mostly
ments led to the following example of how in gallons and quarts—were sent to this
rework sometimes does not work so well.
facility for disposition or disposal.
The parent company I was working for
Soon after receiving this mountain of old
at the time had been acquired, and another PUR, work began both at the plant and the lab
division that made high-end polyurethane to see if there was any way to dispose of this
(PUR) coatings primarily for the yacht
old PUR paint by mixing small quantities into
business was being divested. As part of the new batches of the PUR products produced at
financial agreement with the purchaser of
the plant. Everyone knew that the chemistry
the business unit, my company was required
for these two products was markedly different,
to take over the entire aged, nonmov- and that there was a possibility of a compating inventory of its specialized PUR line.
ibility issue, but the thought process was that a
Working at the plant that received this dead small amount added in each batch would not
EveryMission 1/18/07 9:47 PM Page 1
stock, I was shocked to see just how much
yield a noticeable difference in performance.
a
SPYfor
every mission
Inspect Any Metal Surface Coating
For pipes, tanks or any coated contoured
surface in the field or inside your manufacturing
facility, we simplify coating integrity testing
with our full line of SPY® portable and
permanent Holiday Detectors.
SPY® Model 780, 785 and 790
Portable Holiday Detectors
• New ergonomic design
• Pipe coating inspections up to 60”
• Extremely durable
• Infinite voltage setting on the fly
Compact,
lightweight
wet sponge
holiday
detectors
Reliable continuous inspections
on the assembly line
SPY® Wet Sponge Portable
Holiday Detectors
• No belts, lightweight, fast set up
• Sponge roller speeds large flat
surface area inspections
• Interchangeable flat or roller sponge
SPY® In-Plant
Holiday Detector Systems
• Custom designed to streamline
manufacturing
• From pipecoating inspections to
large flat surfaces
For more details on SPY® products and our complete line of SPY® Holiday
Detection Equipment visit our website @ www.picltd.com.
PIPELINE INSPECTION COMPANY, LTD.
PH: (713) 681-5837 • FAX: (713) 681-4838
4
InspectThis!
A couple of the more optimistic chemists even
thought that mixing these two chemistries
might just produce a product with even longer
color and gloss retention than the standard
formula. Trials were run at the lab and plant,
an acceptable percentage of this old PUR that
could be added into new batches was calculated, and the disposal work began in earnest.
What happened afterward was a big
lesson in how rework and hasty lab work
Fall 2014
can sometimes yield disastrous results.
Soon after some of these finished products
were sold and applied on industrial projects,
complaints were all of the same nature—
the PUR film showed excessive bubbling,
fisheyes, and cratering when curing, and in
some cases looked like it wanted to crawl
from the surface. In the ensuing investigation, it was discovered that something had
been overlooked by the lab when developing
a formula for the rework.
The investigation revealed that the
trial samples of this rework PUR were
never applied over an epoxy intermediate coat, which is most commonly used in
paint systems. No one ever thought to apply
this as a system over the primers that are
typically sold. Instead, the formulas were
tested for viscosity, dry time, gloss, grind,
etc. by using standard QC test methods in
the lab for a batch of paint. This included
viscosity measurements, drawdowns with a
linnetta bar, color and gloss checks, etc. As
it turns out, the “revised” PUR topcoat was
not very compatible with the epoxy primer,
which led to the rash of complaints.
Another issue with this rework plan
was the quantity added to a particular batch.
Depending upon the color of the batch of
paint being produced, there was a variation
in the amount of old PUR added. Some PUR
colors received more rework, some less.
Therefore, the complaints from the field
were not consistent, making each case that
much more difficult to trace and pinpoint
the cause of the problem.
As a result, thousands of gallons of PUR
were recalled as unsalable. This unusable
product now truly needed to be disposed of
at an extreme cost. Claims for rework were
in the tens of thousands of dollars, and the
reputation of this otherwise solid industrial
paint manufacturer was tarnished.
This article is based on CORROSION
2013 paper no. 2863, presented in Orlando,
Florida. It was also published in the October
2014 issue of MP. Another article by the
author will be published in Spring 2015
InspectThis! that will cover additional
case histories of coatings failures and their
causes.
Russell Spotten is a senior consultant
at Corrosion Probe, Inc., PO Box 1151,
Templeton, CA 93465, e-mail: spottenr@
cpiengineering.com. He has more than
35 years of experience in the industrial
coatings market. He has been an active
member in NACE International since
1981 and previously served on the board
of the NACE Channel Islands Chapter.
He is a NACE-certified Senior Corrosion
Technologist and Protective Coatings
Specialist (#6107). !
Fall 2014
InspectThis!
5
Inspection and Training: Variables Involved
in Quality Control
This article is an excerpt from C.G. Munger’s Corrosion Prevention by Protective Coatings, now in its third revision
by Associate Author Louis D. Vincent, Ph.D. The third edition is available from the NACE Store at www.nace.org.
T
here are so many variables involved
in coating applications that it may
seem surprising that any good
applications are ever obtained. First of
all, environmental conditions vary from
hot, dry weather to cold, humid weather.
Coupled with these outside variables are
the variables inherent in the material itself,
which can range from a fast-drying vinyl
to a slow-curing polyamide epoxy. There
are also variables associated with those
doing the application work. For instance,
one person may be proficient at applying
one type of coating, while another may be
much better at applying a second type of
material. Inspection to provide in-process
quality control is the only way in which
variables such as these can be properly
controlled.
Another possible variable is the
degree of understanding regarding the
specifications or the design engineer’s
coating requirements. In many cases, the
general character and physical properties of a coating are not fully recognized
by engineers, architects, contractors, and,
more often than not, the actual owners.
Many of these people regard a high-performance coating as no more than an average
type of paint. While it is true that there
may be no difference in the application
equipment used, there is quite a difference in the handling and processing of the
various coating materials.
A coating is a highly complex material.
It is formulated from as many as 20 different materials mixed (or in some cases
reacted) together, yet the end product is
a very thin film of only a few microns or
thousandths of an inch thickness. As such,
it must adhere to the surface; protect the
surface from penetration or corrosion; and
resist abrasion, high humidity, weather,
water, chemicals, precipitated salts, or
actual immersion in corrosive or aggressive
solutions. In all cases, the coating is a thin
film separating two reactive materials.
Understanding the complex nature
of coatings emphasizes the need for good
specifications and inspection procedures.
Inadequate specifications also represent
a variable, as discussed in the previous
chapter on specifications. Many specifications are so inadequate as to be nearly
useless in obtaining the desired coating.
This is often caused by a lack of communication. However, poor specifications are
often caused by engineers using antiquated
specifications that are completely improper
for the job at hand.
Selection of the lowest bid, irrespective of the quality of the bid, also presents
a difficulty as far as quality control is
concerned. Even though the bid may be
a legitimate one, once problems begin to
occur, there is the inevitable trend toward
a reduction in quality to make up for the
losses caused by various problems. Even
small variations in the application process
can make substantial differences in the
end product. Efforts to reduce labor costs
through quick applications inevitably lead
to a lack of proper care during the application, which further deteriorates the quality
that is necessary for the use of high-performance coatings.
Another difficulty from a quality
standpoint is that too often the superintendents, managers, and even owners fail
to understand the importance of corrosion
control and the role that coatings play in
preventing corrosion. Because painting is
such a commonplace activity, supervisors
and managers often do not realize that it
is the greatest single factor in the cost of
maintaining corrosion-free industrial
structures. Thus, little attention may be
paid to proper inspection of the final job.
While this situation is not true in every
case, it is common enough to be considered a serious difficulty with regard to
coating quality. !
Coating quality depends on level of inspection.
The inspector should understand application
characteristics of the coating.
6
InspectThis!
Fall 2014
2014 Knobloch Scholarship Recipients
Announced
C
ongratulations to Marvin Priddy
and Carlos Romero, this year’s
recipients of the Paul Knobloch
Scholarship. The Knobloch Scholarship
is a discretionary scholarship awarded on
merit by the NACE International Coating
Inspector Program (CIP) Scholarship
Task Group in honor of one of its founding members, Paul Knobloch. In making its
decision, the CIP Scholarship Task Group
takes a number of items into consideration,
including leadership potential, technical
knowledge, financial need, and examination
results in CIP Level 1.
Priddy spent 12 years as a manager for
Sherwin-Williams, where he accumulated
an in-depth knowledge of architectural,
commercial, chemical, and industrial
coatings. Currently working for Brand
Energy, he has been able to focus more of
his learning and experience in the industrial
coating area. The scholarship he received
will help him achieve his goals within
NACE, specifically moving forward to the
peer review level of his certification. With a
desire to never stop learning and to help and
teach others what he has learned, Priddy
hopes to become a certified instructor for
NACE. He is excited to be included in the
group of professionals that make up the past
Knobloch Scholarship recipients and knows
that this opportunity will truly help advance
his career in the coating industry.
Romero received the opportunity to
work in the pipeline industry as part of
the Helmets to Hardhats Program, which
helps veterans transition into jobs. His
first contract was the Keystone Gulf Coast
Project through TransCanada. This allowed
him to shadow experienced inspectors who
taught him the importance of coatings.
Romero hopes to find ways to improve the
coating process in the pipeline industry by
using the knowledge that he has gained in
CIP and implementing it throughout his
career. The Knobloch Scholarship will allow
Item# 37599
By C.G. Munger, Associate Author Louis D. Vincent, Ph.D.
There has been a tremendous increase in the introduction of
new technologies in the coatings industry since the
publication of the second edition of Corrosion Prevention by
Protective Coatings in 1999. The latest edition of this classic
text covers all aspects of the use of high-performance coatings.
The book is a comprehensive reference tool for engineers,
paint superintendents, maintenance personnel, and others
involved in the use of protective coatings to prevent corrosion
on all structures and in all industries and environments.
2014 by NACE Press, 8 1/2” x 11”, softbound, 564 pages.
Marvin Priddy (left) and Carlos Romero
(right), recipients of the 2014 Paul Knobloch
Scholarship award by the NACE International
Coating Inspector Program Scholarship Task
Group.
him to further his education by taking the
CIP Level 3 Peer Review, which he knows
will be a stepping stone for his future plans
of becoming a Senior Coating Inspector and
managing his own crew.!
Fall 2014
InspectThis!
7
Get This!
M
ichael Tarlton, a NACE-certified
Coating Inspector with Russell
Corrosion Consultants, is the
winner of this issue’s drawing for a free
Coating Inspector Program (CIP) course.
Based in Midlothian, Virginia, Tarlton is
currently certified to CIP Level 1 and CIP
Level 1 with Bridge Specialty.
How can you enter the drawing
to win a free CIP course?
Simply send an e-mail message to
inspectthis@nace.org and mention that
you saw this article. To be eligible, you
must have completed CIP Level 1 and your
certification must be active. The free CIP
course (Level 2 or Level 3—Peer Review)
must be taken within one year of winning
the drawing.
Please note that the drawing only
applies to CIP courses and not other NACE
course offerings. The prize is transferrable
but may not be sold. If the prize is transferred, the recipient must meet the same
criteria as the winner. !
Quick and easy
measurement of Protective Coatings
in rough environments
Coating thickness measurement according to international
standards with the robust MP0/MP0R series of pocket
instruments from FISCHER.
• Used on ships, bridges, off-shore installations, cranes, heavy
machinery, and others
• Special measuring modes available in accordance with
SSPC-PA2 and IMO-PSPC
• Measures coatings on steel and aluminum
• Wear resistant probes for precise measurement even on
rough surfaces
• Pre-inspection of large areas with continuous scan mode
• USB port for data communication (MP0R)
• Individual report generation with intuitive FISCHER DataCenter
software
www.fischer-technology.com
860-683-0781 info@fischer-technology.com
Coating Thickness
Material Analysis
Anz_Plattform_Off-Shore_Schiff_MP0_MP0R_117,475x254_sw.indd 1
Microhardness
Material Testing
31.01.14 14:12
8
InspectThis!
Fall 2014
NACE Coatings Course Schedule
CIP LEVEL 1
AUSTRALIA
Houston, Texas, USA
February 15-20, 2015
Houston, Texas, USA
February 22-27, 2015
Sydney, Australia
November 10-15, 2014
Melbourne, Australia
November 17-19, 2014
KOREA
Perth, Australia
November 24-29, 2014
Ulsan, Korea
November 10-12, 2014
Brisbane, Australia
December 8-13, 2014
Ulsan, Korea
November 13-15, 2014
Perth, Australia
December 1-6, 2014
CIP EXAM COURSE 1
USA
Houston, Texas
CANADA
January 18-23, 2015
CIP LEVEL 2
November 9-14, 2014
Perth, Australia
Shanghai, China
December 7-12, 2014
BRAZIL
Beijing, China
December 8-13, 2014
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
AUSTRALIA
CHINA
Shanghai, China
Chennai, India
Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
January 11-16, 2015
December 8-13, 2014
Red Deer, Alberta, Canada
January 18-23, 2015
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
January 25-30, 2015
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
February 8-13, 2015
November 9-14, 2014
CHINA
KUWAIT
Fahaheel, Kuwait
November 22-27, 2014
MEXICO
Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
November 3-8, 2014
November 17-22, 2014
INDONESIA
Batam, Indonesia
December 1-6, 2014
CANADA
INDIA
Mumbai, India
December 3-5, 2014
November 10-15, 2014
Shanghai, China
December 14-19, 2014
Shanghai, China
November 16-21, 2014
Beijing, China
December 15-20, 2014
INDIA
THE NETHERLANDS
Chennai, India
November 3-8, 2014
Mumbai, India
November 24-29, 2014
December 7-12, 2014
Chennai, India
December 15-20, 2014
Midrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
November 3-8, 2014
Batam, Indonesia
Midrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
November 10-15, 2014
MALAYSIA
Ridderkerk, The Netherlands
December 8-13, 2014
PUERTO RICO
Dorado, Puerto Rico
SOUTH AFRICA
INDONESIA
SAUDI ARABIA
Dammam, Saudi Arabia
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
November 1-6, 2014
TRINIDAD
Marabella, Trinidad
November 16-21, 2014
Istanbul, Turkey
UAE
December 14-19, 2014
SAUDI ARABIA
Dammam, Saudi Arabia
Dubai, UAE
November 1-6, 2014
TURKEY
Dubai, UAE
January 31-February 5, 2015
Istanbul, Turkey
November 8-13, 2014
November 10-15, 2014
UAE
UK
Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
November 24-29, 2014
PUERTO RICO
Dorado, Puerto Rico
November 3-8, 2014
December 8-13, 2014
THE NETHERLANDS
Spijkenisse, The Netherlands
TURKEY
November 16-21, 2014
November 17-22, 2014
Dubai, UAE
February 7-12, 2015
UK
USA
Newington, New Hampshire, USA
January 4-9, 2015
Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
November 9-14, 2014
Houston, Texas, USA
January 18-23, 2015
Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
November 24-29, 2014
Houston, Texas, USA
January 19-24, 2015
USA
Houston, Texas, USA
January 25-30, 2015
New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
November 9-14, 2014
Cape Canaveral, Florida, USA
February 2-7, 2015
Newington, New Hampshire, USA
January 11-16, 2015
Houston, Texas, USA
February 2-7, 2015
Concordville, Pennsylvania, USA
January 11-16, 2015
Mobile, Alabama, USA
February 8-13, 2015
Houston, Texas, USA
February 8-13, 2015
Kansas City, Missouri, USA
February 8-13, 2015
Mobile, Alabama, USA
February 15-20, 2015
Houston, Texas, USA
February 8-13, 2015
Kansas City, Missouri, USA
February 15-20, 2015
Houston, Texas, USA
February 9-14, 2015
Houston, Texas, USA
February 15-20, 2015
Plymouth, Michigan, USA
February 15-20, 2015
Houston, Texas, USA
February 22-27, 2015
Fall 2014
InspectThis!
CIP ONE-DAY BRIDGE COURSE
COATINGS IN CONJUNCTION WITH CATHODIC
PROTECTION
USA
Houston, Texas, USA
November 15-15, 2014
CIP PEER REVIEW
CANADA
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
AUSTRALIA
November 17-19, 2014
Houston, Texas
Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
January 16-18, 2015
TURKEY
Red Deer, Alberta, Canada
January 23-25, 2015
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
February 13-15, 2015
Melbourne, Australia
CANADA
CHINA
Shanghai, China
November 4-10, 2014
SCOTLAND
Aberdeen, Scotland
November 29-December 1, 2014
UAE
Dubai, UAE
January 4-9, 2015
USA
November 9-11, 2014
USA
St. Louis, Missouri, USA
November 14-16, 2014
Concordville, Pennsylvania, USA
January 16-18, 2015
Houston, Texas, USA
January 16-18, 2015
Houston, Texas, USA
December 12-14, 2014
Cape Canaveral, Florida, USA
December 12-14, 2014
Houston, Texas, USA
February 13-15, 2015
Kansas City, Missouri, USA
February 20-22, 2015
February 15-20, 2015
MARINE COATING TECHNOLOGY
Istanbul, Turkey
December 8-11, 2014
USA
Houston, Texas
January 19-22, 2015
PCS 1 BASIC PRINCIPLES
EGYPT
Cairo, Egypt
November 15-17, 2014
USA
New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
December 1-3, 2014
San Bernardino, California, USA
January 25-27, 2015
Houston, Texas, USA
January 28-30, 2015
PCS 2 ADVANCED
EYGPT
Cairo, Egypt
November 18-20, 2014
USA
New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
December 4-6, 2014
San Bernardino, California, USA
January 28-30, 2015
Houston, Texas, USA
February 2-4, 2015
e BOOK
Select titles
now available!
We’re busy updating our extensive library of NACE Press books so you
can benefit from the convenience of an electronic version! Look for this
symbol on your favorite title and take advantage of pure portability!
www.nace.org/store
9
10
InspectThis!
Fall 2014
Coatings Resources
NACE International Technical Committees Need You!
• Help influence industry standards.
• Exchange technical information.
• Strengthen your leadership skills.
As a NACE International member, you can sign up online to join a committee—go to the NACE Committees section
at www.nace.org to join an STG or TEG. Contact the chair of a TG to indicate interest in that type of committee.
Types of Committees
• Specific Technology Groups (STGs)
• Task Groups (TGs)
• Technology Exchange Groups (TEGs)
TECHNICAL COMMITTEES
Committee
Description
Scope/Assignment
STG 02
Coatings and Linings, Protective: Atmospheric
Scope: Determine uses, application, and performance of coatings for
atmospheric service. Atmospheric service denotes industrial and commercial equipment, architectural structures, and bridges.
TG 146
Coatings, Thermal-Spray
Assignment: Review and revise joint standard NACE No. 12/AWS C2.23M/
SSPC-CS 23.00, “Specification for the Application of Thermal Spray
Coatings (Metalizing) of Aluminum, Zinc, and their Alloys and Composites
for the Corrosion Protection of Steel.”
TG 148
Threaded Fasteners: Coatings for Protection of
Threaded Fasteners Used with Structural Steel, Piping,
and Equipment
Assignment: Revise NACE Publication 02107, “Coatings for Protection of
Threaded Fasteners Used with Structural Steel, Piping, and Equipment.”
TEG 192X
Coating Industry Problems Confronting Owners and
Contractors
Assignment: To provide a format for handling problems and issues that
affect the owner and contractor utilizing coatings. Problems and issues
may include hazardous waste, volatile organic compounds, applicator
training, federal and state regulations, and others that may develop.
TEG 255X
Coatings, Thermal-Spray for Corrosion Protection
Assignment: Exchange of information regarding thermal-spray coatings
(TSCs) used for corrosion protection.
TG 260
Review of NACE Standard TM0304-2004
Assignment: Review and revise as necessary the test methods in NACE
Standard TM0304.
TEG 311X
Threaded Fasteners: Coatings and Methods of
Protection for Threaded Fasteners Used with
Structural Steel, Piping, and Equipment
Assignment: Share information concerning, and discuss effective methods
for, corrosion control of fasteners used with structural, piping, and equipment connections.
TG 312
Offshore Platform Coatings for Atmospheric and
Splash Zone New Construction
Assignment: Review and revise as necessary the test methods in NACE
Standard TM0404.
TG 340
Offshore Coating Condition Assessment for
Maintenance Planning
Assignment: Develop a standard practice addressing a standard method
and grading system to assess the in-service condition of offshore coatings.
Provide direction regarding the use of assessment data in managing
maintenance painting programs. The documented process will serve as
an aid in the planning, budget, and execution of offshore maintenance
programs.
TEG 346X
Offshore Coatings: Laboratory Testing Criteria
Assignment: Review and critique laboratory testing methods designed to
predict performance in an offshore environment. Assess test variables and
gather data needed to improve industry standard techniques.
TEG 399X
Evaluation, Testing, and Specifying Coating Materials for Assignment: Exchange information, create a task group for state-of-the-art
Elevated Temperatures for Insulated and Uninsulated report, followed by formation of a task group to write a standard practice, and
Service
sponsor symposium.
TG 415
Review and Revise as Necessary NACE Standard
RP0281-2004
Assignment: Review and revise if necessary NACE Standard RP0281-2004,
“Method for Conducting Coating (Paint) Panel Evaluation Testing in
Atmospheric Exposures.”
TG 422
Coatings for Elevated-Temperature Insulated or
Noninsulated Exterior Service
Assignment: To write a state-of-the-art report.
TEG 424X
Liquid-Applied Insulative Coatings for Atmospheric
Service at 0 to 375 °F
Assignment: To discuss issues of spray-applied insulative coatings for
elevated-temperature exterior surfaces.
TEG 428X
Hot-Dip Galvanizing for Steel Corrosion Protection
Assignment: To discuss and furnish technical information on the process
of hot-dip galvanizing and its use as a corrosion protection system for steel
fabrications as well as the inspection of hot-dip galvanized coatings with
other corrosion protection systems.
TG 477
Test Methods for Determining True Insulation Value of
Liquid Insulative Materials Applied on Steel Surfaces from
80 °F to 275 °F
Assignment: To write a standard to determine thermal conductivity of liquid
applied insulative materials.
Fall 2014
InspectThis!
11
Coatings Resources
Committee
Description
Scope/Assignment
STG 03
Coatings and Linings, Protective: Immersion and
Buried Service
Scope: Determine effectiveness, performance criteria, and quality needs
of immersion coatings and lining materials used in immersion service.
TG 009
Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic Linings for Aboveground
Storage Tank Floors
Assignment: To develop a standard practice for installing fiberglass-reinforced
plastic linings within aboveground storage tanks.
TG 030
Coating Conductance
Assignment: To update and revise NACE Technical Committee Report
1D157, “Methods for Measuring Leakage Conductance of Coating on
Buried or Submerged Pipelines,” into a NACE standard test method.
TG 031
Pipeline Coating, Plant-Applied Fusion-Bonded Epoxy:
Review of NACE Standard RP0394
Assignment: To update and revise NACE Standard RP0394-2002,
“Application, Performance, and Quality Control of Plant-Applied, FusionBonded Epoxy External Pipe Coating.”
TG 034
Pipeline Coatings, External: Gouge Test
Assignment: To write a test method and criteria for evaluation of gouge resistance of a particular coating.
TG 037
Pipelines, Oilfield: Thermoplastic Liners
Assignment: To review and revise NACE Standard RP0304-2004 as necessary.
TG 141
Coatings and Linings over Concrete for Chemical
Immersion and Containment Service
Assignment: To update SP0892-2007 to incorporate current technologies
and practices to successfully protect concrete.
TG 246
Thin-Film Organic Linings Applied to Process Vessels and
Tankages
Assignment: Develop application technology for applying thin-film linings to
prevent corrosion, hydrogen-induced cracking, or other corrosion deterioration by internal corrosion mechanisms.
TG 247
Reaffirm NACE Standard RP0105-2005
Assignment: To reaffirm NACE Standard RP0105-2005, “External Repair,
Rehabilitation, and Weld Joints on Pipelines.”
TG 248
Coatings, Heat-Shrink Sleeves for External Repair,
Rehabilitations, and Weld Joints on Pipelines
Assignment: To review and revise as needed NACE Standard RP03032003, “Field-Applied Heat-Shrinkable Sleeves for Pipelines: Application,
Performance, and Quality Control.”
TG 249
Review and Revise as Necessary NACE Standard
RP0402-2002
Assignment: Review and revise as necessary NACE Standard RP0402-2002,
“Field-Applied Fusion-Bonded Epoxy (FBE) Pipe Coating Systems for Girth
Weld Joints: Application, Performance, and Quality Control.”
TG 250
Coal-Tar Enamel Coatings for External Repair,
Rehabilitations, and Weld Joints on Pipelines
Assignment: Review and revise/reaffirm as necessary NACE Standard
RP0602-2002, “Field-Applied External Coal Tar Enamel Pipe Coating
Systems: Application, Performance, and Quality Control.”
TG 251
Review and Revise or Reaffirm SP0109-2009
Assignment: To review and revise or reaffirm SP0109-2009, “Field
Application of Bonded Tape Coatings for External Repair, Rehabilitation,
and Weld Joints on Buried Metal Pipelines.”
TG 263
Review of NACE Standard TM0104-2004
Assignment: Review and revise as necessary the test methods in NACE
Standard TM0104-2004.
TG 264
Offshore Exterior Submerged Coatings: Standard Test
Methods
Assignment: Review and revise as necessary the test methods in NACE
Standard TM0204-2004.
TG 266
Coating and Lining Materials in Immersion Service:
Review of NACE Standard TM0174
Assignment: Review and revise as necessary NACE Standard TM0174-2002,
“Laboratory Methods for the Evaluation of Protective Coatings and Lining
Materials in Immersion Service.”
TG 281
Coatings, Polyurethane for Field Repair, Rehabilitation, Assignment: To develop a standard practice for a minimal specification
and Girth Weld Joints on Pipelines
for the field application, repair, and testing for a polyurethane coating to
be used on the exterior of buried pipelines.
TG 296
Coating Systems, Wax, for Underground Piping
Systems: Review of NACE Standard RP0375
Assignment: To review and revise as necessary NACE Standard RP0375,
“Wax Coating Systems for Underground Piping Systems.”
TG 298
Review and Revise as Necessary NACE Standard
RP0399-2004
Assignment: To review and revise as necessary NACE Standard RP03992004, “Plant-Applied External Coal Tar Enamel Pipe Coating Systems:
Application, Performance, and Quality Control.”
TG 336
External Pipeline Coatings: Practices, Test Methods,
and/or Test Methodologies for High-OperatingTemperature Pipelines, Immersion and Buried Service
Only
Assignment: Develop a technical committee report that outlines state-ofthe-art practices as described in the title.
TG 337
External Pipeline Coatings: Field Installation and
Inspection Criteria for Maximum Performance
Assignment: Develop a standard practice that identifies common aspects
of field installation pertaining to quality installation and long-term performance.
TG 352
Coating Systems (External) for Pipeline Directional
Drill Applications
Assignment: To develop a standard practice for minimum specifications
for external coatings for use in directional drill service.
TEG 354X
Pipeline Coatings: Underground Blistering
Assignment: Discuss blistering of underground pipeline coatings, causes
of blistering, and prevention methods.
12
InspectThis!
Fall 2014
Coatings Resources
Committee
Description
Scope/Assignment
TG 425
State of the Art in CUI Coating Systems
Assignment: Describe available systems, performance, and industryaccepted criteria for coatings under insulation.
TEG 435X
Effects of Bioethanols on Fused Silica Containment
Vessels in Immersion and Phase Change Exposures
Assignment: To hold technical information exchanges (TIEs) on the
effects of bioethanols, aromatic ethanols, and sulfurous emissions on
fused silica containment vessels.
TG 470
Cathodic Disbondment Test for Coated Steel Structures
under Cathodic Protection
Assignment: To develop a standard test method to conduct the cathodic
disbondment test.
TG 479
NACE Adoption of ISO 21809-3
Assignment: Review ISO 21809 with the goal to adopt or adopt with changes
(amendments) to the standard and create a NACE/ISO, possibly modified,
standard.
TG 490
Review and Adoption of API 5L2, “Recommended Practice Assignment: To review and modify (if and where necessary) API 5L2,
for Internal Coating of Line Pipe for Non-Corrosive Gas
“Recommended Practice for Internal Coating of Line Pipe for Non-Corrosive
Transportation Service”
Gas Transmission Service,” with input from NACE user community. The
standard will have a dual NACE/API number.
TG 507
Review and Revise as Necessary SP0188-2006
Assignment: To review and revise as necessary SP0188-2006, “Discontinuity
(Holiday) Testing of New Protective Coatings on Conductive Substrates.”
TG 508
Review and Revise as Necessary SP0490-2007
Assignment: To review and revise as necessary SP0490, “Holiday
Detection of Fusion-Bonded Epoxy External Pipeline Coatings of 250 to
760 µm (10 to 30 mils)
TG 516
Standard Practice for Evaluating Protective Coatings
for Use under Insulation
Assignment: To write a standard practice for testing coatings for
corrosion under insulation (CUI) prevention.
TG 520
Pipeline Coating Peel Strength Test
Assignment: To develop a simple and reliable peel test standard for the
three-layer polyethylene, three-layer polypropylene, heat-shrink sleeve,
and tape coatings in the field and laboratory.
STG 04
Coatings and Linings, Protective: Surface Preparation
Scope: Determine effectiveness, performance criteria, and quality needs
of various methods of surface preparation for the application of coatings
and linings.
TG 006
Blasting: Review of Joint Standards NACE 1-4/SSPC-SP
5, 10, 6, and 7, and NACE No. 8/SSPC-SP 14
Assignment: To review, revise, or reaffirm as necessary joint blasting
standards NACE No. 1-4/SSPC-SP 5, 10, 6, 7: “White Metal Blast Cleaning,”
“Near-White Metal Blast Cleaning,” “Commercial Blast Cleaning,” and
“Brush-Off Blast Cleaning,” and NACE No. 8/SSPC-SP 14, “Industrial Blast
Cleaning.”
TG 320
Review and Revise as Necessary NACE No.
13SSPC-ACS-1
Assignment: To review and revise as necessary NACE No. 13/SSPC-ACS-1,
“Industrial Coating and Lining Application Specialist Qualification and
Certification.”
TG 323
Wet Abrasive Blast Cleaning
Assignment: To review and update joint technical committee report NACE
6G198/SSPC-TR 2, “Wet Abrasive Blast Cleaning.”
TG 350
Surface Preparation by Wet Abrasive Blast Cleaning
Assignment: Develop a standard for wet abrasive blast cleaning of steel
surfaces that will complement the existing NACE/SSPC joint standards
for dry abrasive blast cleaning.
TG 417
Review and Revise as Necessary Joint Surface
Preparation Standard NACE No. 6/SSPC-SP 13
Assignment: Review and revise as necessary joint standard NACE No. 6/
SSPC-SP 13, “Surface Preparation of Concrete,” to reflect current industry
practices and to reflect proper reference to other industry publications.
TG 419
Review and Revise as Necessary NACE Standard
RP0287-2002
Assignment: Review and revise as necessary RP0287-2002, “Field
Measurement of Surface Profile of Abrasive Blast-Cleaned Steel
Surfaces Using a Replica Tape,” and to include other methods of profile
measurement now being widely used throughout the industry.
TEG 423X
Nonvisible, Nonwater-Soluble Contaminants Affecting
Corrosion Protection
Assignment: Discuss the effects of coating performance when applied
over nonvisible, nonwater-soluble contaminants and their effects on
coating performance.
TG 443
Field Testing for Soluble Salts: Commonly Used
Methods
Assignment: Develop a technical committee report detailing commonly
used soluble salts field test methods.
TEG 469X
Surface Preparation Issues
Assignment: To provide a forum to discuss various issues affecting surface
preparation.
TG 518
Soluble Salt Testing Frequency and Locations on
Previously Coated Surfaces
Assignment: Develop a standard regarding soluble salt testing frequency and
locations on previously coated surfaces.
Fall 2014
InspectThis!
13
Coatings Resources
Committee
Description
Scope/Assignment
STG 43
Transportation, Land
Scope: To promote the development of techniques to extend the life of
land transportation equipment.
TG 061
Revision of NACE SP0592 (formerly RP0592),
“Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces
of New and Used Railway Tank Cars in Concentrated
(90-98%) Sulfuric Acid Service”
Assignment: To update and revise NACE SP0592 (formerly RP0592),
“Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of New and Used
Railway Tank Cars in Concentrated (90-98%) Sulfuric Acid Service.”
TG 063
Railcars: Corrosion Protection and Control Program
Assignment: Develop guidelines for railcar lining requalification.
TEG 064X
Railcar Surface Preparation
Assignment: To keep abreast of industry changes and techniques and
report findings annually.
TG 067
Review and Revise or Reaffirm NACE SP0302-2007
Assignment: To review and revise or reaffirm NACE SP0302-2007, “Selection
and Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of New and Used Rail
Tank Cars in Molten Sulfur Service.”
TG 271
Removal Procedures for Nonvisible Contaminants on
Railcar Surfaces
Assignment: To prepare a technical committee report describing surface
decontamination for railcars prior to coating application.
TEG 291X
Land Transportation: Information Exchange on
Corrosion and Coating-Related Issues
Assignment: Technical information exchange in conjunction with an STG
meeting.
TG 332
Review and Revise or Reaffirm as Necessary NACE
SP0386-2007
Assignment: To review and revise as necessary NACE SP0386-2007
(formerly RP0386), “Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces
of Covered Steel Hopper Railcars in Plastic, Food, and Chemical Service.”
TG 333
Review and Revise or Reaffirm as Necessary NACE
SP0295-2008
Assignment: To review and revise or reaffirm NACE SP0295-2008 (formerly
RP0295), “Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of New and
Used Rail Tank Cars.”
TG 339
Railcars: Coating Application on Exterior Surfaces of
Steel Railcars
Assignment: Review and revise as appropriate NACE Standard RP06922003, “Application of a Coating System to Exterior Surfaces of Steel Rail
Cars.”
TG 366
Railcars:  Corrosion under Tank Car Insulation
Assignment: Review and revise as appropriate NACE Publication 14C296
to ensure information is still relevant.
TG 378
Waterborne Coatings on Railcars
Assignment: To prepare a state-of-the-art report on waterborne coatings
on railcars.
TG 379
Surface Preparation by Encapsulated Blast Media for
Repair of Existing Coatings on Railcars
Assignment: To prepare a state-of-the-art report on surface preparation
by encapsulated blast media for repair of existing coatings on railcars.
TG 394
Guidelines for Qualifying Personnel as Abrasive Blasters
and Coating and Lining Applicators in the Rail Industry
Assignment: To review and revise NACE Standard RP0495-2003.
TG 406
Review of NACE SP0398-2006
Assignment: Review and revise as necessary NACE SP0398-2006
(formerly RP0398), “Recommendations for Training and Qualifying
Personnel as Railcar Coating and Lining Inspectors.”
TG 437
Maintenance Overcoating of Railcar Exteriors
Assignment: To prepare a state-of-the-art report for the application of
maintenance overcoating of railcar exteriors.
TG 444
Guidelines for Data Collection and Analysis of Railroad
Tank Car Interior Coating/Lining Condition
Assignment: To produce a standard that provides guidelines for inspecting, rating, and documenting the condition of interior coatings and
linings in railroad tank cars to comply with H-201.
TG 456
Coating Thickness Measurement, Methods, and
Recording—Specific to the Railcar Industry
Assignment: Prepare a state-of-the-art report outlining currently used
procedures for dry film thickness measurement and recording for
coatings on railcars.
STG 44
Marine Corrosion: Ships and Structures
Scope: To study the corrosion mechanisms, causes, effects, and corrosion
control remedies for ships, structures, and equipment exposed to marine
environments and to disseminate information in the form of industry
standards and formal and informal technical information exchanges on
the research, development, and performance of materials, coatings, and
improved or innovative methods to mitigate problems related to marine
corrosion.
TEG 181X
Marine Vessel Corrosion
Assignment: To study the causes, effects, and remedies of corrosion in
various marine vessels.
TG 452
Testing of Coating Suitability, Anode Consumption,
and Corrosion Evaluation with Use of BWT Systems
Assignment: To write a standard on evaluation of risk for damage to
coatings, increased anode consumption, and corrosion in conjunction
with the use of ballast water treatment (BWT) systems.
14
InspectThis!
Fall 2014
Coatings Resources
TG 461
Standard for Hull Roughness Measurements on Ship Assignment: To develop a standard on how to perform both in-docking
Hulls in Dry Dock
hull roughness readings (before blasting and cleaning in dry dock) and
before out-docking hull roughness readings.
TG 475
Standard for Underwater Evaluation of Degrees of Assignment: To develop a pictorial standard to be used to evaluate the
Fouling
(1) extent, (2) location, and (3) type of fouling to ship hulls and propellers.
TG 476
Corrosion Protection of Offshore Wind Power Units
Assignment: To write a standard practice that defines a life cycle of corrosion
protection for offshore wind power structures.
TEG 523X
Marine Corrosion of Copper Alloys
Assignment: To discuss and disseminate information on marine corrosion of
copper and copper alloys.
STANDARDS & REPORTS
Atmospheric Service
Standards
SP0108-2008
RP0281-2004
SP0297-2012 (formerly RP0297)
NACE No. 12/AWS C2.23M/SSPC-CS
23.00
TM0304-2004
TM0404-2004
Reports
NACE Publication 80200/SSPC-TR 4
NACE Publication 02103
NACE Publication 02203/ICRI
Technical Guideline 03741/SSPC-TR 5
Immersion/Buried Service
Standards
SP0274-2011 (formerly RP0274)
RP0375-2006
SP0185-2007 (formerly RP0185)
SP0111-2011
SP0188-2006 (formerly RP0188)
SP0288-2011 (formerly RP0288)
SP0490-2007 (formerly RP0490)
SP0892-2007 (formerly RP0892)
RP0394-2002
SP0298-2007 (formerly RP0298)
RP0399-2004
NACE No. 10/SSPC-PA 6
RP0402-2002
RP0105-2005
SP0181-2006 (formerly RP0181)
RP0602-2002
NACE No. 11/SSPC-PA 8
RP0303-2003
RP0304-2004
TM0174-2002
TM0102-2002
Corrosion Control of Offshore Structures by Protective Coatings
Method for Conducting Coating (Paint) Panel Evaluation Testing in Atmospheric Exposures
Maintenance Painting of Electrical Substation Apparatus Including Flow Coating of
Transformer Radiators
Specification for the Application of Thermal Spray Coatings (Metallizing) of Aluminum,
Zinc, and Their Alloys and Composites for the Corrosion Protection of Steel (RP02032003)
Offshore Platform Atmospheric and Splash Zone Maintenance Coating System
Evaluation
Offshore Platform Atmospheric and Splash Zone New Construction Coating System Evaluation
Preparation of Protective Coating Specifications for Atmospheric Service
Liquid-Applied Coatings for High-Temperature Atmospheric Service
Design, Installation, and Maintenance of Protective Polymer Flooring Systems for Concrete
High-Voltage Electrical Inspection of Pipeline Coatings Prior to Installation
Field-Applied Underground Wax Coating Systems for Underground Pipelines:
Application, Performance, and Quality Control
Extruded Polyolefin Resin Coating Systems with Soft Adhesives for Underground or
Submerged Pipe
Coating Technical File in Accordance with the IMO Performance Standard for Protective
Coatings
Discontinuity (Holiday) Testing of New Protective Coatings on Conductive Substrates
Inspection of Linings on Steel and Concrete
Holiday Detection of Fusion-Bonded Epoxy External Pipeline Coatings of 250 to 760
µm (10 to 30 mils)
Coatings and Linings over Concrete for Chemical Immersion and Containment Service
Application, Performance, and Quality Control of Plant-Applied, Fusion-Bonded Epoxy
External Pipe Coating
Sheet Rubber Linings for Abrasion and Corrosion Service
Plant-Applied, External Coal Tar Enamel Pipe Coating Systems: Application,
Performance, and Quality Control
Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic (FRP) Linings Applied to Bottoms of Carbon Steel
Aboveground Storage Tanks (RP0202-2002)
Field-Applied Fusion-Bonded Epoxy (FBE) Pipe Coating Systems for Girth Weld Joints:
Application, Performance, and Quality Control
Liquid-Epoxy Coatings for External Repair, Rehabilitation, and Weld Joints on Buried
Steel Pipelines
Liquid-Applied Internal Protective Coatings for Oilfield Production Equipment
Field-Applied Coal Tar Enamel Pipe Coating Systems: Application, Performance, and
Quality Control
Thin-Film Organic Linings Applied in New Carbon Steel Process Vessels (RP0103-2003)
Field-Applied Heat-Shrinkable Sleeves for Pipelines: Application, Performance, and
Quality Control
Design, Installation, and Operation of Thermoplastic Liners for Oilfield Pipelines
Laboratory Methods for the Evaluation of Protective Coatings and Lining Materials on
Metallic Substrates in Immersion Service
Measurement of Protective Coating Electrical Conductance on Underground Pipelines
Item Number
21126
21026
21081
21100
21245
21246
Item Number
24209
24219
24220
Item Number
21010
21013
21029
21153
21038
21039
21045
21060
21064
21085
21089
21093
21096
21106
21025
21098
21099
21101
21103
21206
21241
Fall 2014
InspectThis!
15
Coatings Resources
TM0104-2004
TM0204-2004
SP0109-2009
TM0109-2009
Offshore Platform Ballast Water Tank Coating System Evaluation
Exterior Protective Coatings for Seawater Immersion Service
Field Application of Bonded Tape Coatings for External Repair, Rehabilitation, and Weld
Joints on Buried Metal Pipelines
Aboveground Survey Techniques for the Evaluation of Underground Pipeline Coating
Condition
21243
21244
21143
21254
Surface Preparation
Standards
Item Number
SP0178-2007 (formerly RP0178)
Design, Fabrication, and Surface Finish Practices for Tanks and Vessels to be Lined for
Immersion Service
21022
RP0287-2002
Field Measurement of Surface Profile of Abrasive Blast Cleaned Steel Surfaces Using a
Replica Tape
21035
TM0105-2012
Test Procedures for Organic-Based Conductive Coating Anodes for Use on Concrete Structures
21247
NACE No. 1/SSPC-SP 5
White Metal Blast Cleaning (SP0494-2007)
21065
NACE No. 2/SSPC-SP 10
Near-White Metal Blast Cleaning (SP0594-2007)
21066
NACE No. 3/SSPC-SP 6
Commercial Blast Cleaning (SP0694-2007)
21067
NACE No. 4/SSPC-SP 7
Brush-Off Blast Cleaning (SP0794-2007)
21068
WJ-1: SP0212-2012
Joint Surface Preparation Standard Waterjet Cleaning of Metals—Clean to Bare Substrate
(WJ-1)
21158
WJ-2: SP0312-2012
Joint Surface Preparation Standard Waterjet Cleaning of Metals—Very Thorough Cleaning
(WJ-2)
21155
WJ-3: SP0412-2012
Joint Surface Preparation Standard Waterjet Cleaning of Metals—Thorough Cleaning
(WJ-3)
21156
WJ-4: SP0512-2012
Joint Surface Preparation Standard Waterjet Cleaning of Metals—Light Cleaning (WJ-4)
21157
NACE No. 6/SSPC-SP 13
Surface Preparation of Concrete (RP0397-2003)
21082
NACE No. 8/SSPC-SP 14
Industrial Blast Cleaning (SP0299-2007)
21088
NACE No. 13/SSPC-ACS-1
Industrial Coating and Lining Application Specialist Qualification and Certification
21122
SP0508-2010
Methods of Validating Equivalence to ISO 8502-9 on Measurement of the Levels of
Soluble Salts
21134
SP0213-2013
Definition of Set Soluble Salt Levels by Conductivity Measurements
Reports
21172
Item Number
NACE Publication 6A192/SSPC-TR 3
Dehumidification and Temperature Control during Surface Preparation, Application,
and Curing for Coatings/Linings of Steel Tanks, Vessels, and Other Enclosed Spaces
24083
NACE Publication 6G194/SSPC-TR 1
Thermal Precleaning
24183
NACE Publication 6G197/SSPC-TU 2
Design, Installation, and Maintenance of Coating Systems for Concrete Used in
Secondary Containment
24193
NACE Publication 6G198/SSPC-TR 2
Wet Abrasive Blast Cleaning
24199
Land Transportation
Standards
Item Number
SP0386-2007 (formerly RP0386)
Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of Covered Steel Hopper Rail Cars
in Plastic, Food, and Chemical Service
21033
SP0592-2006 (formerly RP0592)
Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of New and Used Rail Tank Cars in
Concentrated (90 to 98%) Sulfuric Acid Service
21057
RP0692-2003
Application of a Coating System to Exterior Surfaces of Steel Rail Cars
21058
SP0295-2008 (formerly RP0295)
Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of New and Used Rail Tank Cars
21070
RP0495-2003
Guidelines for Qualifying Personnel as Abrasive Blasters and Coating and Lining
Applicators in the Rail Industries
21072
SP0398-2006 (formerly RP0398)
Recommendations for Training and Qualifying Personnel as Railcar Coating and Lining
Inspectors
21086
SP0302-2007 (formerly RP0302)
Selection and Application of a Coating System to Interior Surfaces of New and Used
Rail Tank Cars in Molten Sulfur Service
21095
Reports
Item Number
NACE Publication 14C296
Protective Coatings for Mitigating Corrosion under Insulation on Rail Tank Cars
24191
NACE Publication 6G198/SSPC-TR 2
Wet Abrasive Blast Cleaning
24199
16
InspectThis!
Fall 2014
Introducing
Introducing
Introducing
the
the
the
3-Year
3-Year
3-Year
Warranty
Warranty
Warranty
on
on
on
the
the
the
Model
Model
Model
10/20
10/20
10/20
Holiday
Holiday
Holiday
Detector!
Detector!
Detector!