Group Therapy Dr Sabar Rustomjee Adapted in part from Principles of Group Psychotherapy – American Group Psychotherapy Association Inc Authored by Robert L. Weber, Ph.D.,CGP, FAGPA Email : www.agpa.org What is a Group? The existence of Group in our Minds. There is no such thing as an individual without a group. Just as we are not able to understand a melody if we listen separately to each note, so we are unable to understand different aspects of an individual if we isolate him / her from their groups of belonging. A group is defined by its task or function. Without a task focus it remains a collection of individuals. Group Therapy Group Therapy focuses on interpersonal learning: – It helps individuals get along in a more honest and authentic way with other people. – It provides a support network for specific problems and challenges. Analytic Group Psychotherapy (as distinct from all aspects of Group Therapy) provides the development of an awareness of both Conscious and Unconscious factors. Uses of Group Therapy. It provides an opportunity to learn: • ‘With’ and ‘From’ other group members and the accounts related by them • That you are not as different as you think • That you are not alone in your thinking • An entire group can benefit from sharing thoughts and experiences Group Therapy In addition to Group Therapy you could; –Engage in Individual Therapy – Combined Individual Therapy and Group Therapy –Engage in Couple Therapy –Engage in Family Therapy –Receive medication –Have a combination of the above Analytic Group Psychotherapy will help you to enhance your self awareness of psychodynamics in all types of groups. This includes Psychodrama Groups, Behavioural Groups, Family Therapy Group, Organizational Groups, Groups for Children, Adolescents, Homogenous Groups of clients with certain medical illnesses, Homogenous or Heterogeneous groups of clients with psychological disorders – depression, anxiety, grief reactions, Psychological trauma (homogenous groups preferred), Addictive disorders, first episode Psychosis etc. History of Groups 1900 – 1909 (1905) Joseph Henry Pratt MGH Boston, tuberculosis patients, focus, support and inspiration. 1920 to 1929 (1922) Alfred Adler. Counselling with prison and child guidance populations 1930’s Trigent Burrow. Psychoanalytic Group Analysis 1940 to 1949 1940’s and World War II seen as beginning of modern work group Kurt Lewin (1940, 1951) founder and promoter of group dynamics and field theory Wilfred Bion (1948) broke away from his Freudian background and highlighted the importance of Group Dynamics Sigmund Foulkes (1940 onwards) started a method of Group-Analytic Psychotherapy 1941-1942 Moreno founded the American Society of Group Psychotherapy 1943 Slavson established the American Group Psychotherapy Association and later the International Journal of Group Psychotherapy (1948) History of Groups 1960 to 1969 Development in a humanistic-existential orientation. Fritz Perls – Gestalt and Eric Berne – Transactional Analysis Carl Rogers – Developed the T-group concept to make it more personal ie. “basic encounter groups” 1970 to 1979 Yalom (1970) Lieberman (1971) 1980 to 1989 Self help groups increased 1992 J.Scott Rutan – Developed the Psychodynamic Model for Groups i. Clinical Training in Group Psychotherapy A. An engagement in Experiential Groups of staff members only is an excellent clinical exercise in “Attunement” (tuning in with), “Containing” emotions of oneself and others, “Holding” keeping together without fragmentation. This should be with an experienced Group Leader. This will then help the staff in their work; a) with clients to be able to do the same. b) with relatives of patients. c) to avoid burn out themselves. B. Supervision by an experienced Group Leader. ii. Theoretical Training in Group Psychotherapy in Australia The Australian Association of Group Psychotherapists offers an intensive 4 year training program, for membership of the Association. This can be reduced in duration as appropriate. Group as a System A. Basic Concepts. 1. System - a structure composed of a whole and its parts. 2. Boundary 3. Opening / Closing / Permeability 4. Autonomy 5. Hierarchy 6. Homeostasis – ability to maintain internal equilibrium 7. Specialization – components lower in hierarchy may develop specialised functions that contribute to higher goals. B. System Structure. 1. External Group Boundary 2. Leadership Boundary 3. Therapist Boundary 4. Personal Boundary of the individual member 5. Interpersonal Boundary 6. Internal Boundary 7. Subgroup Boundary Curative Factors in Groups through understanding oneself and our roles in society (Adapted from Irvin Yalom and Claudio Neri with inclusions by Sabar Rustomjee) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Hope Universality leading to Normalisation Ventilation Developing a sense of self, of being a person with a right to exist To develop a sense of belonging To develop independent thinking whilst being in a group Developing spontaneity Learning from experience Learning through being exposed to a Corrective Emotional Experience where appropriate Psycho-education where appropriate in educational groups Altruism as applicable to the role of the conductor and the role of the group member Curative Factors in Groups through understanding oneself and our roles in society (Adapted from Irvin Yalom and Claudio Neri with inclusions by Sabar Rustomjee) 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Understanding Family Interactions and Psychodynamics Relating it to group Interactions Relating it to Society and Work Interactions In Analytically orientated groups, understanding the Freudian Unconscious and social Unconscious Transference and Counter Transference Attacking Myths and attacking Shame Differentiating between the Public Face and Private Inner Self Understanding Introjection, Projection, Denial, Splitting, Intellectualization, Rationalisation, reasons for overprotection etc in an analysis framework Developing sharing and patience To be able to live in a space, which is not always clear or well defined To engage in reciprocity and the capacity to invest in the individual and the group Understanding non-compliance Preparations for future choices in life Roles of a Group Convenor • To create a Potential space – a Container in which group work can be done. • Non-Directive although capable of assuming leadership – – – – To remain disengaged and hence, objective To enable people to learn a dialogue Group work is Observation, Thinking, Reflecting and Relating To convert mindlessness into understanding and meaning. ie to promote shared new meaning – To keep boundaries – To encourage every group to develop its own legitimacy, its own uniqueness, its focus and its dynamics Framework or Boundaries • • • • • • • • • Time Place Criteria for inclusion to the Group Guidelines – what will be valuable, acceptable and productive Guidelines regard emergency and routine contacts outside group hours Who is welcome to the group eg. Inclusion of children, spouses, etc. Confidentiality Limits – what limits are unacceptable with regards to conduct What would lead to non-entry to the group – temporary or permanent Group Dynamics – Essential for productive groups - adapted from S. Freud.-Identification. Std ed. 8. P116. • To recognise all Group members need to be treated alike – with equal love eg. In the church or the army The common Ego Ideal (Ideal of AIMS) the group OR can be the Ideals of the Group Leader Member Egos of all members. Separate and also in communication Group Dynamics – Essential for productive groups • Each member’s Ego Ideal can become the Collective Ideal for the group • Individuality is maintained in their egos and needs to be maintained • Ego Ideal needs to feed back into their separate egos • Ideals that can be reached – that are appropriate, are beneficial Wilfred Bion’s 3 Basic Assumptions A) Basic Assumption Dependency B) Basic Assumption Fight – Flight C) Basic Assumption Pairing When these are able to be overcome then the Work Group which can bear pain and work to accept the realities of life, can begin. Earl Hopper has in addition described the 4th Basic Assumption namely Incohesion: Aggregation/Massification or basic assumption I;A/M. He states that aggregates and masses are two most simple primitive social formations. He describes features of both. He describes both having survival value and that the social pattern of a flock of flamingos is analogous to that of say a social mass of a herd of walruses. Foulksian Group Analytic Concepts as developed by Sigmund FOULKES, E. J. Anthony , Earl Hopper, Malcolm Pines and Farhad Dalal. Foulkes believed that psychology is neither Individual nor Group except by abstraction. Although symptom tolerance of any given culture may be considerable, it will fall far below the tolerance of a group analytic therapeutic situation. ( E.J.Anthony.) According to Foulkes the Aim of Group Analysis is to establish harmony between the Individual and the world- not Conformity. The group functions as a ‘hall of mirrors ’ where resonance of thoughts occurs between group members. The thoughts of each group member in the group, will reverberate/ resonate with some aspect of the group theme which is discussed in the’ here and now’ of the group, and becomes linked with what is uppermost in her or his mind. When verbalized in the group, by the member, it may be interpreted appropriately. The Group Matrix is described by Foulkes as the ‘hypothetical web of communication in a group.’ Foulksian Group Analytic Concepts as developed by Sigmund FOULKES, E. J. Anthony , Earl Hopper, Malcolm Pines and Farhad Dalal. The symbolic value of the group in the form of a circle is described aptly by Dalal who states: ‘To give a simple example ..the Circle has an inside, an outside and a boundary. The inside needs both the outside and the boundary to give it existence. Remove the inside and the circle collapses till there is nothing. Remove the outside and the circle expands until there is everything and thus nothing. Hence all 3 are interrelated and none can exist in isolation from the others.’ He then follows it by describing Foulkes’ radical ideas openly leading to greater understanding of group analysis. He describes Foulkes’ description of ‘inner process’ as in fact being internalized group dynamics. He clarifies that according to Foulkes, the ‘ Foulksian neonate is born into certain mechanisms and forces which it then introjects. The direction being from outside to inside. This is a different concept from the Kleinian infant using elements of its internal world to structure its external world.’ As in Yalom’s Curative Factors, Foulksian group analysts highlight the importance of Hope in group work. The Social Unconscious Foulkes concept of the Social Unconcious is further developed by Earl Hopper, Malcolm Pines and Farhad Dalal among others. Foulksian analysts state that the individual is ‘embedded in the social and that the individual is also permeated by the social.’ This they claim differs from the concept of the Freudian unconscious in the id, being both repressed and unconscious. Hopper describes clinical work occurring in both Time and Space in four related areas, namely; The here and now. The here and then The there and now and The there and then Common Group Tension by H.Ezriel Required Relationship Avoided Relationship with the Convenor/Group with the Convenor/Group Calamity • Idealise the group to AVOID attacking the group • The Required Relationship is primarily defensive • Therapist needs to interpret the Common Group Tension Common Group Tension in Patient’s Group (H.Ezriel) Required Relationship Avoided Relationship with the Convenor/Group with the Convenor/Group Initial 0-8 sessions of Defensive material reveal: • Passivity, Dependency and Outward over Compliance – with the false image of an “ideal” patient These lead to: • Rationalisations and masking of internal conflicts. •Splitting of good/bad – Convenor and patient being the good ones •Lack of authenticity • To avoid Ext. Reality with loss of control Calamity • Fear of total abandonment similar to childhood experiences of deprivation. Fears that it will be repeated in the “here and now” • To avoid experiencing of negative transference with feelings of rejection and helplessness and feelings of aggression towards staff and partners •TO ADMIT TO REBELLION AND NON COMPLIANCE D. Stock Whitaker and Libermann – Focal Conflict Theory Disturbing Motive Group Solution Reactive Motive Group solution has a defensive and enabling function Selection and Exclusion Criteria for Group Treatment Exclusion Criteria – Contraindications for Group Therapy. a) Protection of the Group 1. Adherence to the Group Contract - may not be possible 2. Physically dangerous b) Efficacy for the specific individual. 1. Crisis cases – need individual attention before the client may be suitable for group 2. Limited Ego strength with regressive pull 3. Impulsive – non controlled with “acting out” 4. Life style factors preventing attendance eg. Pilots, nurses traveling a lot 5. Acute psychosis 6. Not adequately psychologically minded – prefers biological treatment rather than psychological 7. Severe somatisation when confronted with psychological issues in a group 8. Paranoid style of responding 9. Brittle denial 10. Antisocial personality – lack of empathic capacity 11. Primitive character pathology Selection and Exclusion Criteria for Group Treatment Questions worthy of contemplation before starting a client in a group. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Is this the right patient for the group? Is this the right group for this patient? Am I the right therapist for this patient? Is this the right time for this person to join this group? (He) Why has person not engaged in a group previously or failed to attend (if he/she has been in a group) Preparation of Patients for Group Therapy (Rutan & Stone 2001) A. B. C. Bonding – Getting to know the patient apart from the group . Building a beginning alliance Evaluation : Factors to asses an Individual for Specific tasks for preparation Types of Groups • Small • Medium • Large Group Interventions for Treatment of Psychological Trauma • • • • • • • • • • Module 1 : Group Intervention for Treatment of Trauma in Adults Module 2: Group Intervention for Treatment of Trauma in Children Module 3: Group Intervention for Treatment of Trauma in Adolescents. Module 4: An Overview of Evidence-based Group Approaches to Trauma with Adults Module 5: An Overview of Evidence-based Group Approaches to Trauma with Children and Adolescents Module 6: The Later Stage: The Role of Group Interventions in Coping with the Aftermath of Traumatic Events Module 7: Countertransference: Effects on the Group Therapist Working with Trauma Module 8: Unique Aspects of Group work with Trauma Module 9: Identification and Management of Masked Trauma Reactions in Groups Module 10:Group Interventions for Bereavement Following Traumatic Events These Modules are compiled by the American Group Psychotherapy Association 2004 Brief History of Group Therapy Early Writings 1. Le Bon (1920) The Crowd: A study of the Popular Mind. “Once individuals become 2. McDougall (1920) The Group Mind. Discusses that groups can also enhance the 3. Freud (1921) Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. part of a crowd, a type of hypnotic power engulfs them……Individuals loose their sense of responsibility and a group mind assumes control.” These factors contribute to the ‘diminishment of human functioning’ - sense of increased strength, even invincibility - contagion overtakes - suggestibility is greatly increased individual’s behaviour through organization Modern Theories – Group as a Whole i. a) Group as a Whole approaches (Bion 1960). Experiences in Group b) Turquet (1974). Oneness. c) Hopper (1997). Incohesion: Aggregation / Massification ii. Ezriel.H. (1973). Psychoanalytic Group Therapy iii. Foulkes (1948). Introduction to Group Analytic Psychotherapy iv. Whitaker and Lieberman (1958, 1964). Psychotherapy through Group Process. Modern Theories – Interpersonal Theories Yalom’s interpersonal Theory (1995) ‘The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy’. The major thrust for change occurs in the group interaction as it occurs in the here and now, maladaptive transactions are observed and interpreted, a corrective emotional experience is created, with an appropriate group culture, and concentration or the nature of the feedback. The Psycho-dynamic Model and Groups (Rutan 1992) A. Level of Intervention 1. Past – (here and now) – Future 2. Group-as-a-whole – Interpersonal – Individuals 3. In Group – Out group 4. Affect – Cognition 5. Process – Content 6. Understanding – Corrective emotional experience B. Avenues into the unconscious 1. Transference 2. Counter transference 3. Free Association Brief History of Group Therapy and Modern Theories are as per American Group Psychotherapy Association’s Manual – Principles of Group Psychotherapy Self Help Groups Self Help Groups process is a NON DIRECTIVE, NONTHREATENING process of RE-ORIENTATION occurring within a SAFE, COMFORTABLE and REASSURING HUMAN GROUP emphasizing the importance of mutual aid. They are a formalized mutual help network whose members share a specific problem Aims of Self Help Groups 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Behavioural Change – eg. Alcoholics Anonymous, Weight Watches, Gamblers Anonymous Groups concerned primarily with enhancing primary care – Self Help Groups associated with chronic illnesses, Blindness, Deafness, Arthritis, Diabetes, M.S., Muscular Dystrophy, Motor Neurone Disease, Lupus, Cystic Fibrosis, etc. Groups concerned primarily with providing Social Support and new coping strategies – Alanon, P.W.P, Grow etc, Alzheimers Support Group, Stroke Support Centre, P.R.O.P Groups concerned with Rehabilitation – Self Help Groups within the Schizophrenia Fellowship, Anorexia and Bulimia Foundation, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Foundation, Vic Autistic Child and Adult Association Self Help Groups concerned with Social Survival eg. Different women’s groups, groups for Gay Activists Self Help Groups concerned with personal growth and self actualization. Enquiries. For all enquiries and purposes of circulation, correspond with Dr Sabar Rustomjee Email ; sabar@iprimus.com.au Postal address. 1A Erica Avenue Malvern East Vic 3145 Australia
© Copyright 2024