1. hobbies and interests
2. inventors and patents

American Intellectual Property Law Association
IP Valuation
John T. Johnson & Michael F. Autuoro
Fish & Richardson P.C.
IP Practice in Japan Committee
2014 AIPLA Mid-Winter Institute
Firm Logo
Phoenix, AZ
January 28-29, 2014
1
AIPLA
Agenda
• Intro to IP Valuation
– What is it?
– Why the Increased Need?
– Circumstances Requiring Valuation
• Intro to Valuation Methods
– Quantitative Valuation Techniques
– Qualitative Valuation Techniques
• IP Valuation/Devaluation Events
Firm Logo
2
AIPLA
What is IP Valuation?
• An estimation of the worth of an IP
asset or a set of IP assets
• Many valuation techniques, ranging
from the simple to the extremely
complex
– Patents exist even on patent valuation!
Firm Logo
3
AIPLA
Increased Need?
Greater need for IP Valuation
today than in the past?
Firm Logo
4
AIPLA
Increased US Patents/Litigation More Opportunities?
Firm Logo
5
AIPLA
More NPEs/Aggregators  More Opportunities?
Firm Logo
Source: PatentFreedom © 2013. Data captured as of August 6, 2013
6
AIPLA
Greater Availability of Information about IP
• Various information sources make valuation
easier?
– Litigation Searching & Analytics—e.g., Lex Machina,
DocketNavigator
– Patent Analytics
• Online File Histories (Public Pair), Assignment Information, Fee
Status, Patent Families
• Robust Patent Databases and Reporting (e.g., Thomson
Innovation)
• International Patent Databases (e.g., EPO)
– Internet search engines
Firm Logo
7
AIPLA
Know Why You Need to Valuate
• The objectives of the valuation will impact the
strategy as well as the type of valuation that is
appropriate
• What is the purpose of the valuation?
Firm Logo
8
AIPLA
Example Valuation Contexts
•
•
•
•
•
•
Negotiations to sell/license IP rights
Merger, acquisition, joint venture or bankruptcy
To support decision-making in patent disputes
Fund raising/loans/venture capital
Developing internal IP risk mitigation strategy
For accounting purposes
Firm Logo
9
AIPLA
Patent Valuation Methods
• Generally, two categories of valuation:
quantitative and qualitative
– Quantitative: focus on numerical and
measurable data
– Qualitative: focus on characteristics and
potential uses of the IP
Firm Logo
10
AIPLA
Quantitative Approach
• Examples of quantitative methodologies:
–
–
–
–
(1) Income-based method
(2) Market-based method
(3) Cost-based method
(4) Option-based method
• Overlap of methods
Firm Logo
11
AIPLA
(1) Income-Based Method
• Value of IP asset = the sum of expected income
flows it will generate over time, discounted to the
present day
– Offensive analysis: What are projected future cash flows
from licensing or enforcement?
– Defensive analysis: What are the savings (royalty
payments, litigation costs, design-around costs) due to
owning the asset?
Firm Logo
12
AIPLA
(1) Median Damages Awarded for Patent Cases
Firm Logo
2013 PWC Patent Study (available athttp://www.pwc.com/en_US/us/forensic-services/publications/assets/2013-patent-litigation-study.pdf )
13
AIPLA
(1) Reported Royalty Rates by Industry
Firm Logo
2012 KPMG report: Profitability and royalty rates across industries: Some preliminary evidence
14
AIPLA
(1) Income-Based Method Simple Example
• Company C is offered 100 patents for license, prior
to Owner offering for sale to third parties
– Due diligence on the patents suggests that there is risk of
infringement as to 5 patents
– If Company doesn’t acquire/license patents, what are the chances it
will be sued? (e.g., 80% chance of suit on a risky patent)
– Probability of loss? (e.g., 30%)
– Targeted activity and est. exposure in case of loss (e.g., $10M)
– Average Litigation costs? (e.g., $1M, win or lose)
Risk
Patents
5
15
Hit
Rate
Firm
x Logo
80% =
Expected
Suits
Loss
Rate
Exposure
in Loss
4
x ((30% x
$10M)
Avg. Lit
Expenses
+
$1M)
Total
=
$16M
AIPLA
(2) Market-Based Method
• IP value is estimated based on similar market
transactions (e.g. similar license/acquisition
agreements) of comparable patent rights
• Was it a similar transaction?
–
–
–
–
When did it occur?
What technology area?
What was purpose of deal?, e.g., was acquisition for offensive or defensive purpose?
Who were the parties to the deal?
• Were rights comparable?
– Was agreement a license, cross-license or acquisition?
– Perpetual term?
– Existing
Firmencumbrances?
Logo
16
AIPLA
(2) Market Information Sources
•
•
•
•
•
The Internet
Press Releases
Company annual reports
Royalty rate publications
Court decisions
• Unlike real estate transactions, the terms of most
IP transactions are kept confidential.
Firm Logo
17
AIPLA
(2) Recent Market Transaction Data
Date
Seller
Buyer
Technology
Type
Deal Price
No of IP Assets
Per
Patent/Asset
9/13
Nokia
Microsoft
Mobile
Phone
10-yr
CrossLicense
1.65B Euro
Nokia’s portfolio
--
12/12
Kodak
RPX/IV Led
Consortium
Digital
imaging
Sale
$527 Million
~1,110 patents
$479K (per
patent)
4/12
Microsoft
Facebook
IM; Email;
Browsing
Sale/
License
$550 Million
650 patents, plus a license
to 275 patents
$594K - $846K
(per patent)
4/12
AOL
Microsoft
IM; Email;
Browsing
Sale/
License
$1.056
Billion
~800 patents
$1.32M
(per patent)
8/11
Motorola
Mobility
Google
Mobile
Phone
Sale/
Acquisition
$12.5 Billion
Acquires Motorola Mobility
and its ~17000 patents
$735K per
patent)
6/11
Nortel
Rockstar
Consortium
(Apple,
EMC,
Ericsson,
Microsoft,
RIM and
Sony)
Mobile
Phone
Sale
$4.5 Billion
~6,000 patent assets
$750K (per
asset)
11/10
Novell
CPTN
Consortium
Networking/
Software
Sale
$450 Million
~882 patents
$510K (per
patent)
18
Firm Logo
AIPLA
(2) Market Valuation Range Example
Kodak
(12/2012)
Novell/
CPTN
(11/2010)
$479K per
patent
$510K per
patent
Google/
Motorola
(8/2011)
Nortel
(6/2011)
Facebook/
Microsoft
(4/2012)
Microsoft/
AOL
(4/2012)
$735K per
patent
$750K per
patent
$594K to
$846K per
patent
$1.32M per
patent
Low
High
$479K
$1.32M
Firm
Logosimilar to the deal at hand?
Which is
most
19
AIPLA
(3) Cost-Based Method
• IP valuation based on the costs that were
expended in the development of the IP
• Two approaches:
– “Reproduction cost” method: Based on costs associated
with the purchase or development of a replica of the
patent under valuation
– “Replacement cost” method: Based on costs that would
be spent to obtain an equivalent patent asset with
similar use or function
Firm Logo
20
AIPLA
(3) Cost-Based Method
• Sources of costs:
– Direct expenditures, such as costs with materials, labor
and management, e.g., R&D, prosecution costs
– Opportunity costs; costs due to delays in market
entrance; lost investment opportunities
Firm Logo
21
AIPLA
(4) Option-Based Method
• IP valuation based on stock-option pricing models
– More complex
– Patent rights viewed as analogous to a “call option”
– Both give a right to exploit an asset in the future, and to
exclude others from using it
Firm Logo
22
AIPLA
Patent Valuation Methods
• Generally, two categories of valuation:
quantitative and qualitative
– Quantitative: focus on numerical and
measurable data
– Qualitative: focus on characteristics and
potential uses of the IP
Firm Logo
23
AIPLA
Qualitative Approach
• Valuation performed through the analysis of
aspects that can impact the value of an IP asset,
e.g., legal aspects, technology level of the
innovation, market details, company organization
• Not based on purely financial analytical data
Firm Logo
24
AIPLA
Qualitative Considerations
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Incremental improvement?
Relevant market?
Who developed the IP?
How close to expiration?
Are continuations pending?
Subject to broadening reissue?
Nature of the claims? Method? System?
File History—clean?
Forward
Citations
Firm Logo
25
AIPLA
Valuation/Devaluation Events
Judicial/Legislative Events
Possible Effect
Obviousness—KSR
-
Algorithm Rule—Aristocrat
-
Divided Infringement—Akamai/Limelight (CAFC)
+
Venue—TS Tech/Volkswagen
-
Willful Infringement—Seagate
-
Injunctive Relief—eBay
-
Injunctive Relief for NPEs at ITC
+
Entire Market Value Rule Damages—Lucent
-
IPR/Prost-Grant Review
-
Inequitable Conduct Heightened Requirements—
Star Scientific/Therasense
Firm
LogoReform
Legislative
Patent
+
Patentable Subject Matter—CLS Bank/Alice
26
+/?
AIPLA
THANK YOU! ANY QUESTIONS?
John T. Johnson
jjohnson@fr.com
Michael F. Autuoro
autuoro@fr.com
Fish & Richardson P.C.
601 Lexington Avenue – 52 Floor
New York, NY 10022
Firm Logo
27
AIPLA