FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY LECTURE 3 Clinical and Forensic Assessment of Psychopathy

FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY
LECTURE 3
Clinical and Forensic Assessment
of Psychopathy
Forensic Psychology
1
Recommended Reading

Gacono, Carl B. (2000), The Clinical and Forensic Assessment of
Psychopathy Practitioners Guide. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(Chapters 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 13).

Howitt, Dennis), (2009) , Introduction to Forensic and Criminal Psychology:
3rd Edition. London: Pearson Prentice Hall – Chapter 20.

Millon, Theodore; Simonsen, Erik; Birket-Smith, Morten; and Davis, Roger D.
(1998), Psychopathy: antisocial, criminal and violent behaviour. New York:
Guilford. (Reading: Chapters 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 10, 12, 27).
Articles:
 Hare, Robert D. (1998). The Hare PCL-R: Some issues concerning it's use
and misuse. Legal and Criminal Psychology. 3, 99-119.

Herpertz, Sabine and Sass, Henning (1997). Psychopathy and antisocial
syndromes. Current Opinion in Psychiatry. 10, 436-440.
Forensic Psychology
2
Aims of Lecture
 Examine the link between mental illness and crime
 Describe what is meant by the term “psychopathy” and
understand the difficulties associated with defining psychopathy
 Describe the usefulness of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist –
Revised (PCL-R).
 Examine the concept of assessing risk and recidivism in
forensic populations.
Forensic Psychology
3
Mental Illness and Crime
 Concept of Mental Illness is perceived in different ways
between the professions of psychology and law. The media have
an effect on the public perception of mental illness and crime.
 Link
et al (1992) –Sample of 500 never treated
residents/mental patients in NYC. Psychiatric Epidemiology
Research Interview – assessing mental illness symptoms.
Although patients reported higher levels of violence, age, gender
and education level were a higher predictor of violent behaviour
than psychotic symptoms.
Forensic Psychology
4
Mental Illness and Crime
 Swanson (1990) – US study using the Diagnostic Interview
Schedule. While schizophrenia was associated with violence,
substance abuse was a greater predictor in the likelihood of
violent behaviour.
 Hodgins (1997) Stockholm – 15,000 born in 1953



MEN - 32% with no mental illness criminals/ 50% of
mentally ill criminal
WOMEN - 6% with no mental illness criminals/ 19% of
mentally ill criminal
Why?
Forensic Psychology
5
History of Psychopathy
“We cannot treat, except empirically, what we do not
understand and we cannot prevent what we do not
comprehend”
Brittain (1970)
Pinel (1800’s)
“Manie Sans Delire” – insanity without a confusion of mind.
Patients engaged in impulsive and self damaging acts,
despite the fact that their reasoning was intact and that they
knew what they were doing was irrational.
Forensic Psychology
6
History of Psychopathy
Cleckley (1976) – “The Mask of Sanity” – Proposed that
psychopaths present a convincing mask with superficial charm,
good intelligence, etc, yet are impulsive, have poor judgment and
lack remorse.
 16 characteristics including interpersonal, affective, cognitive and
behavioural characteristics
irresponsible lifestyle.
associated
Forensic Psychology
with
an
impulsive,
7
Cleckley’s Characteristics








Superficial Charm
Absence of Delusions
Absence of Nervousness
Unreliability
Lying
Lack of Remorse
Anti-social Behaviour
Poor Judgment
Forensic Psychology








Egocentric
Poor Reactions
Lack of insight
Unresponsiveness in
interpersonal relations
Alternative behaviour
Threat of Suicide
Promiscuous
Lack of Life Plan
8
Terms



Antisocial Personality Disorder(ASPD)
Sociopathy
Psychopathy
(Terms used interchangeably in the literature)
Sociopathy diagnosis in DSM I – sexual deviation, alcoholism and anti-social
behaviour were features.
Forensic Psychology
9
Anti Social Personality Disorder








18 years
Conduct Disorder before age 15
Violations of law
Disregard for others/self
Deceitfulness
Impulsivity
Irritable/aggressive
Lack of Remorse
Forensic Psychology
10
Hare Psychopathy Checklist
PCL-R – 20 item 40 point scale completed with a semi-structured
interview, and a review of independent and historical and
contemporaneous data
PCL-SV – 12 item scale
 Factor 1 – Interpersonal/affective features – callousness, lack of
remorse.
 Factor 2 – behavioural/affective features – socially deviant
lifestyle.
Forensic Psychology
11
Hare Psychopathy Checklist
1. Glibness/Superficial Charm
2. Grandiose sense of self-worth
3. Need for stimulation/proneness to boredom
4. Pathological Lying
5. Conning/Manipulative
Forensic Psychology
12
Hare Psychopathy Checklist
6. Lack of remorse or Guilt
7. Shallow Affect
8. Callous/Lack of Empathy
9. Parasitic Lifestyle
10.Poor Behavioural Controls
Forensic Psychology
13
Hare Psychopathy Checklist
11.Promiscuous Sexual Behaviour
12.Early Behavioural Problems
13.Lack of Realistic Long Term Goals
14.Impulsivity
15.Irresponsibility
Forensic Psychology
14
Hare Psychopathy Checklist
16.Failure to accept Responsibility for Own Actions
17.Many Short Term Marital Relationships
18.Juvenile Delinquency
19.Revocation of Conditional Release
20.Criminal Versatility
Forensic Psychology
15
Anti Social Personality Disorder/Psychopathy
Behavioural Criteria in ASPD – behaviour that is observable and
can be agreed on by clinicians, but
Does not inform us about character
Does not predict behaviour
Does not suggest any specific type of treatment
Most psychopaths will meet criteria for DSM ASPD but ASPD
will not meet criteria for psychopathy
Forensic Psychology
16
Anti Social Personality Disorder/Psychopathy
Psychopathy – behavioural criteria and personality traits
APA (1994) – forensic population study:
 80% met criteria for ASPD
 15-25% met criteria for psychopath.
Quinsey, Rice & Harris follow-up study of offenders(1995):
 Psychopath – 80% committed offences
 Non-psychopath – 20% committed violent offences
Forensic Psychology
17
Administration of PCL-R





Historical information
Record review
Clinical Interview
Greater than or equal to 30 psychopath
Over 32.5 – likely to be violent .
Forensic Psychology
18