1. No category

Välkomna till informationsmöte om
Horisont 2020 – Säkra samhällen
5 november 2015
Anna Halldén, Nationell kontaktperson,
VINNOVA
Snabbfakta
• Statlig myndighet under
Näringsdepartementet
• Investerar varje år ca 2,7 miljarder
kronor i forskning och utveckling
• Nationell kontaktmyndighet för
Horisont 2020 EU:s ramprogram
för forskning och innovation
• Drygt 200 personer på kontoren i
Stockholm och Bryssel
• Generaldirektör är Charlotte
Brogren
Agenda
Inledning och intro till Horisont 2020
Anna Halldén, moderator, VINNOVA
Information om kommande utlysningar 2016-2017
Johan Lindberg, Expert i Programkommittén
Var kan man få mer information och stöd?
Anna Halldén, VINNOVA
Kennert Johansson, EUSME Support Horizon 2020
Lisa Hörnsten Friberg, Samverkansplattformen
Erfarenheter, lärdomar och rekommendationer
- Projektexempel
Universitetslektor Erik Borglund, Mittuniversitetet
Professor Marie Torstensson Levander, Malmö högskola
Frågor, diskussion, mingel
Ni som ser via webben och vill ha
presentationerna
Anna.hallden@vinnova.se
Nearly 80 billion euro during 7 years
Years 2014 - 2020
Budget ca €80B
Two
reimbursement
rates
70% or 100%
Challenge-driven
approach – focus
on innovation
Max 8 months
from closure of call
to contract signed
Bi-annual work
programmes
3 legal entities from
3 member or
associated countries
Horizon 2020 – facts in short
Horizon 2020
The basics: three
priorities
Excellent
science
Bild 7
Industrial
leadership
Societal
challenges
WP 2016-2017
Kommande utlysningar
Secure Societies in
Horizon 2020
Johan Lindberg
Secure Societies
WP 2016-2017
• Three Calls, two dead-lines, one exception …
The Three Calls
• Critical infrastructure protection – CIP
• Security (three sub-calls) – SEC
• Disaster Resilience – DRS
• Fight Against Crime and Terrorism – FCT
• Border Security and External Security – BES
• General Matters – GM
• Digital Security – DS
In principle six areas with different
focus
• Critical infrastructure protection – CIP
• Disaster Resilience – DRS
• Fight Against Crime and Terrorism – FCT
• Border Security and External Security – BES
• Digital Security – DS
• General Matters – GM
• Plus Other Actions -
The two dead-lines
• 17:00 on the 25:th of August 2016
• 17:00 on the 24:th of August 2017
The exception …
• Beware, the digital security (DS) area has multiple
dead-lines (16 Feb 2016, 25 Apr 2016, 25 Aug 2016, 25
Apr 2017)
Topic – Description
Generally broad and encompass a range of
possible approaches
Key features:
• Specific Challenge
• context and why
• Scope
• specifies the focus but without describing specific approaches
• Expected Impact
• key elements of what is expected to be achieved
Types of action (Research and Innovation; Innovation actions;
etc.)
Bild 15
Topic description – Technology
Readiness Levels (TRL)
• Call text often specify what readiness level to aim for in the project
• TRL 1 basic principles observed
• TRL 2 technology concept formulated
• TRL 3 experimental proof of concept
• TRL 4 technology validated in lab
• TRL 5 technology validated in relevant environment
• TRL 6 technology demonstrated in relevant environment
• TRL 7 system prototype demonstration in operational environment
• TRL 8 system complete and qualified
• TRL 9 actual system proven in operational environment
Horizon 2020 - Type of actions
Research and Innovation
Actions (RIA):
100% of eligible direct costs
25% for indirect costs
Innovation Actions (IA):
Building a Team
Min 3 partners from
3 different EU countries
or AC
Profit-organisations
70% of costs
Non profit: same as RIA
Coordination and support actions:
100% of eligible costs, 25% for indirect costs
Pre-Commercial Procurement, Prizes, SME instrument,
ERC Grants, Marie Curie Fellowships, ERAnet Cofund etc.
PCP Pre-Commercial Procurement
 When
– Challenge requires R&D to get new solutions developed. Problem
clear, but pros / cons of several potential competing solutions not
compared / validated yet. No commitment to deploy (PPI) yet.
 What
– Public sector buys R&D to steer development of solutions to its
needs, gather knowledge about pros / cons of alternative solutions,
to avoid supplier lock-in later (create competitive supply base)
 How
– Public sector buys R&D from several suppliers in parallel (comparing
alternative solution approaches), in form of competition evaluating
progress after critical milestones (design, prototyping, test phase),
risks & benefits of R&D (e.g. IPRs) shared with suppliers to
maximise incentives for wide commercialisation
PCP-example
• National Health Service, UK (NHS)
• Improve hand hygiene among surgeons
• Procurement requirements:
• Kills more germs
• Less harm to the surgeons skin
• Solution:
• Machine that scans plasma (ionized gas with microbiological
characteristics) over the hands
• The system is fast, gentle on the skin and more effective at killing germs
Innovation Procurement = PCP + PPI
/
Complementarity
PCP to steer the development of solutions towards concrete public sector
needs, whilst comparing/validating alternative solution approaches from
various vendors
PPI to act as launching customer / early adopter / first buyer of
innovative commercial end-solutions newly arriving on the market
20
Status of PCP implementation
across Europe
Update November 2012 status
Framework identified
Awareness Raising Working on and/or pilots
Exploring possibilities framework in preparation
SILVER
Malta
Latvia Slovenia
Romania
Greece
Cyprus
Bulgaria Estonia
Luxembourg
Slovakia
Czech Republic
Switzerland
Pilots
started
Denmark
V-CON
Iceland
Sweden
Ireland
Lithuania
Finland
Poland
Spain
CHARM
Netherlands
UK
Belgium
Hungary
France
Portugal
Italy
Austria
Germany
SMART@FIRE
Norway
Projects in dotted-line are cross-border EC funded PCPs:
SILVER: EC co-funded PCP pilot started January 2012 (Supporting Independent Living of Elderly through Robotics)
CHARM: EC co-funded PCP pilot started September 2012 (Common Highways Agency Rijkswaterstaat Model)
V-CON: EC co-funded PCP pilot started October 2012 (Virtual Construction of Roads)
SMART@FIRE: EC co-funded PCP pilot started November 2012 (Integrated ICT solutions for Smart Personal Protective
Equipment for Fire Fighters and First Responders)
More Info about national PCP initiatives in Member States: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/pcp/msinitiatives_en.html
More info about EU funded cross border PCP projects: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/pcp/projects_en.html
Background info
PCP website:
Info on calls, EU funded projects, background docs, FAQs, PCP
initiatives in Member States and Associated Countries etc
http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/innovation-procurement
Detailed info about PCP calls:
Calls page on PCP website links to all official call docs:
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/news/calls-eu-fundingopportunities-pre-commercial-procurement-and-public-procurementinnovative
Info about PCP/PPI initiatives in MS and AC
http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/innovation-procurementinitiatives-around-europe
WP 2016-2017
CIP –Critical Infrastructure Protection
•
Societies and their economics are strongly dependent upon the operation of our countries’ infrastructure
•
Disruptions may result from many kinds of hazards and physical and/or cyber-attacks on installations and systems
•
Comprehensive, yet installation-specific approach is needed
•
•
•
Water Systems,
•
Energy Infrastructure (power plants and distribution)
•
Transport Infrastructure and means of transportation
•
Communication Infrastructure
•
Health Services
•
Financial Services
Solutions to increase security and resilience of all functions performed
•
Prevention, detection, response, and in case of failure, mitigation of consequences
•
Physical, cyber or combined threats, and potential cascading effects
Type: Innovation action, called for both 2016 and 2017
DRS – Disaster Resilience
• Securing society against disasters
• reduce the loss of human life, environmental, economic and material damage
• natural and man-made disasters, including from extreme weather events, crime and terrorism threats
• Improved tools and systems
• response planning and scenario building
• Situational awareness and decision making
• CBRN - preparednesss and response
• Validation of biological toxins measurements
• CBRN cluster to facilitate innovation
•
Provide future toolkits and systems in the CBRN area
•
Identify technology development needs
•
Develop and integrate technologies into toolkits and systems
DRS – topic titles
• SEC-01-DRS-2016: Integrated tools for response planning and
scenario building – Innovation Action
• SEC-02-DRS-2016: Situational awareness systems to support civil
protection preparation and operational decision making – PCP
• SEC-03-DRS-2016: Validation of biological toxins measurements after
an incident: Development of tools and procedures for quality control –
Innovation Action
• SEC-04-DRS-2017: Broadband communication systems – PCP
• SEC-05-DRS-2016-2017: Chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear
(CBRN) cluster – Research and Innovation Action, CSA
FCT – Figth Against Crime and Terrorism
•
New capabilities for fighting and preventing crime illegal trafficking and terrorism
•
Covers both physical and cyber domain
•
Includes understanding and tackling terrorist ideas and beliefs
•
Must respect human rights and privacy
•
Avoiding violent radicalization
•
Prevention, Investigation, and Mitigation of criminal and terrorist acts
•
•
•
Mass gatherings, cybercrime, corruption/financial crime/ infiltration of organized crime, high impact petty crimes, high
impact domestic violence
Tools and techniques
•
Forensics
•
Cyber crime
•
UAV detection
•
Video analysis
•
Explosives detection
Improved knowledge among law enforcement agencies (LEA)
•
New technologies
•
Test and demonstration of new concepts
•
EU-wide training and exercises
FCT – topic titles
• SEC-06-FCT-2016: Developing a comprehensive approach to violent radicalization in the EU from early
understanding to improving protection – Research and Innovation Action
• SEC-07-FCT-2016-2017: Human Factor for the Prevention, Investigation, and Mitigation of criminal and
terrorist acts – Research and Innovation Action
• SEC-08-FCT-2016: Forensics techniques on: a) trace qualification, and b) broadened use of DNA –
Research and Innovation Action
• SEC-09-FCT-2017: Toolkits integrating tools and techniques for forensic laboratories – PCP
• SEC-10-FCT-2017: Integration of detection capabilities and data fusion with utility providers’ networks –
Innovation Action
• SEC-11-FCT-2016: Detection techniques on explosives: Countering an explosive threat, across the
timeline of a plot – Research and Innovation Action
• SEC-12-FCT-2016-2017: Technologies for prevention, investigation, and mitigation in the context of fight
against crime and terrorism - PCP
BES -Border Security and External
Security
• Development of technologies and capabilities which are required
to enhance systems, equipment, tools, processes, and methods
for rapid identification to improve border security, whilst
respecting human rights and privacy
• New technologies, capabilities and solutions which are required
to support the Union's external security policies in civilian tasks
• Land border security (potential for cost reduction)
• Borders and border crossing points
• Maritime security
• Autonomy in surveillance and command and control systems
BES – topic titles
• SEC-13–BES–2017: Next generation of information systems to support EU external policies – PCP
• SEC-14-BES–2016: Towards reducing the cost of technologies in land border security applications –
Research and Innovation Action
• SEC-15-BES–2017: Risk-based screening at border crossing – Innovation Action
• SEC-16-BES–2017: Through-foliage detection, including in the outermost regions of the EU – Research
and Innovation Action
• SEC-17-BES-2017: Architectures and organizations, big data and data analytics for customs risk
management of the international goods supply chain trade movements – Research and Innovation
Action
• SEC-18-BES–2017: Acceptance of "no gate crossing point solutions“ – Research and Innovation
Action
• SEC-19-BES-2016: Data fusion for maritime security applications – Innovation Action
• SEC-20-BES-2016: Border Security: autonomous systems and control systems – Innovation Action
Digital Security
• ICT-driven transformations bring opportunities across important sectors but also
vulnerabilities to critical infrastructures and digital services
• Can have significant consequences on the functioning of society, economic growth and
the technological innovation potential of Europe.
• Cross-cutting; ICT, Health and Security
• Assurance and Certification
• Improved addressing of basic cyber security threats
• SMEs, local public administration and Individuals
• Digital security for eHealth related solutions
• Economic metrics of cyber security
• cost-benefit framework, incentives and business models
• Improved dialogue, within the EU and internationally
DS topic list
• DS-01-2016: Assurance and Certification for Trustworthy and Secure ICT systems, services and
components – Research and Innovation Action, Innovation Action, CSA (12/4-2016)
• DS-02-2016: Cyber Security for SMEs, local public administration and Individuals – Innovation Action
(25/8-2016)
• DS-03-2016: Increasing digital security of health related data on a systemic level – Research and
Innovation Action (16/2-2016)
• DS-04-2016: Economics of Cybersecurity – Research and Innovation Action (25/8-2016)
• DS-05-2016: EU Cooperation and International Dialogues in Cybersecurity and Privacy Research and
Innovation – CSA (25/8-2016)
• DS-06-2017: Cryptography – Research and Innovation Action (25/4-2017)
• DS-07-2017: Addressing Advanced Cyber Security Threats and Threat Actors – Research and
Innovation Action, Innovation Action (24/8-2017)
• DS-08-2017: Privacy, Data Protection, Digital Identities – Innovation Action (24/8-2017)
GM – General Matters
• Pan European Networks of practitioners and other actors in the field of
security
• Firefighters, police and intelligence communities, border guards, custom authorities,
explosive specialists, forensic laboratories, medical emergency teams, etc.
• Common understanding of innovation potential, more widely accepted understanding,
expression of common innovation and standardization needs among practitioners in the
same discipline.
• More articulated and coordinated uptake of innovative solutions among practitioners
from different disciplines who are often called to act together to face major crisis.
• More efficient use of investments made across Europe in demonstration, testing, and
training facilities for first responders.
• Synergies with already established European, national and sub-national networks of
practitioners.
• An improved NCP service
GM – topic titles
• SEC-21–GM-2016-2017: Pan European Networks of practitioners
and other actors in the field of security
• Practitioners (end-users) in the same discipline and from across Europe
• Practitioners (end-users) from different disciplines and concerned with
current or future security or disaster risk and crisis management issues in a
particular geographical area
• the Mediterranean region (including the Black Sea):
• the Arctic and North Atlantic region:
• the Danube river basin:
• the Baltic region:
• Entities from around Europe that manage demonstration and testing sites,
training facilities, including …
Other Actions
• Space surveillance and tracking (SST)
• Supporting the implementation of the Security Industrial Policy and
Action Plan through the European Reference Network for Critical
Infrastructure Protection (ERNCIP)
• Reviewing of running projects for the 2016 and 2017 calls “Critical
Infrastructure Protection” and “Security
• Reviewing of running projects for the 2016 and 2017 calls "Critical
Infrastructure Protection" and “Digital Security”
• Support to workshops, conferences, expert groups, communications
activities or studies
• Cryptography Prize
SME - Small and Medium-sized
Enterprises
< 250 employees
Bild 36
Annual turnover
< 50 m€
Annual balance
sheet < 43 m€
Autonomous
SME Instrument
50.000 €
~6
months
1- 3 M€
12 - 24
months
Coaching
Fast track to innovation
• Reduced time to market
• Bottom-up
• 3 cut-offs per year
• Time-to-grant: 6 months
• Consortia max. 5
• Grant up to €3 mn
Impact criterion has higher
weighting in evaluations
FTI cut off 29 April 2015
• 269 proposals
• 16 project finansed
(5,9 %)
• DE 13 participants
• FR 9 participants
• NL 9 participants
• UK 9 participants
• SE 3 participants
• 38 participants filed
from SE
• 3 participants finansed
(7,9 %)
• 0 SE coordinators
finansed
• 2 coordinators above all
thresholds, but without
financing
EUREKA instruments
00
00
00
© EUREKA Secretariat 2014
00
EUREKA instruments main features
Time to grant
A maximum time to grant of 8 months
5 months
for informing all applicants of
outcome of scientific evaluation
Some exceptions for ex:
• Actions of ERC
• Complex actions
• Large number of proposals
• On request of applicants
3 months
for signature of GA
Evaluation overview
Eligibility
check
Individual
evaluation
Consensus
Threshold
No funding
Ranking
(EC + experts)
 Peer review
 Evaluators are often not
multidisciplinary
NEW
Grant
finalisation
Commission
Funding decision
Commission staff do not review project proposals!
2015-11-06
Bild 43
Evaluation criteria
Excellence
Impact
Implementation
Scientific and/or
technological
excellence
(relevant to the topics
addressed by the call)
Potential impact through
the development,
dissemination and use of
the project results
Quality and efficiency
of the
implementation and
management
The evaluation criteria are call specific
Bild 44
Questions
to assess “Impact”
• What will come out of your project?
• European and/or global dimension?
• Who needs the results and why?
• How will the results affect economy,
technology level, society, environment
etc?
• How do you plan to
exploit/disseminate the results?
Consortium building
• Min. three partners from three
different EU countries or AC
• Match research groups with topic
• Defined role of each group
• Synergy between the groups
• Partners known to deliver
• Balance between academia
industry and public sector
Experiences and Recommendations
Build a competitive team!
Be aware of:
• Roadmaps, policy documents,
previously funded projects
• Cross-cutting issues
No negotiation of proposals!
Pre-register your proposal and
submit in time!
Experiences and Recommendations
• Conformance to the scope and
expected impact
• Holistic view of the project
• Proposals may be both interdisciplinary and cross-sectorial
• Value chain approach
• Be sure the project fits with your
business plan (industry)
Information och stöd
Vem kan jag fråga?
Horizon 2020 information
- support
Local level
- Universities
(Grants offices)
Regional level
- Enterprise Europe Network
(EEN)
National level
National Contact Point
- VINNOVA
- VR (Swedish research
council), MSB
National SME support office
-EUSMESupport2020
Bild 50
Support from
National Contact Points
• Information about Horizon 2020
Information days
Thematic workshops
One-on-one meetings
Legal and financial advice
• Training courses
• Analysis and statistics of
Swedish participation
• Following the development and
content of Horizon 2020
EUSME Support2020
Ett samordnat supportkontor för små och medelstora företag
• VINNOVA och Tillväxtverket finansierar projektet ”Supportkontor för små och
medelstora företag till Horisont 2020”
• Projektet löper på tre år, till mars 2018
• Syftet är att öka svensk medverkan från små och medelstora företag i Horisont 2020
(innefattar även Eurostars)
• Supportkontoret ger kostnadsfri rådgivning till företag som önskar delta i en EUutlysning.
• Enterprise Europe Network finns representerade i det nya Supportkontoret
EEN-kontoren är direkt ett uppdrag från EU och hanteras via Tillväxtverket
http://enterpriseeurope.tillvaxtverket.se
Supportkontorets kärnuppgifter:
• rådgivning och stöd samt
informationsspridning
• utbildning samt workshops kring
relevanta aspekter av Horisont 2020
• etablera forum för erfarenhetsutbyte och
nätverksskapande, egen hemsida under
uppbyggnad
Vilka ingår?
I nätverket/konsortiet ingår 8 parter:
Fyra institut inom RISE:
• SP Sveriges Tekniska
Forskningsinstitut *
• Acreo Swedish ICT *
• Swerea IVF*
• Innventia
•
•
•
•
SwedenBIO
LTU Business AB* (Luleå)
Uminova Innovation AB (Umeå)*
IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet
*EEN-kontor
RISE är projektledare
Med detta nätverk har vi
ämnesområdeskompetens
inom majoriteteten
av områdena
inom Horizon 2020.
Vi har en samlad
erfarenhet av olika
aspekter kring
ansökningar, portalen,
rapportering, avtal mm…
Vi täcker upp Sverige
geografiskt!
Detta kan du få hjälp med
• Diskussion kring ditt företags behov, identifiering av EU-program och möjliga
ingångar
• Diskussion av preliminära idéer och formulering av ett projekt
• Råd vid registrering av företaget i EU:s databas
• Råd om sammansättning av konsortier, tips kring partnersökning
• Genomgång av de ekonomiska och administrativa villkoren
• Genomgång av ansökningsförfarandet, de olika stegen och den fortsatta
hanteringen efter inlämning
• Råd kring hur man skriver ansökan och genomläsning av ansökningar
• Rådgivning under genomförandet av godkända projekt, t ex i frågor rörande
rapportering
• Helpdesk
På länken nedan finns ett webformulär till supportkontorets jourmejl.
Vi svarar dig inom 48 timmar: www.ri.se/erbjudanden/sma-och-medelstora-foretag/eusme
Samverkansplattform H2020: Säkra samhällen
Ett projekt inom 2:4 Krisberedskap
Lisa Hörnsten Friberg, FOI
Plattformens syfte
-långsiktigt bidra till en stärkt svensk
krisberedskapsförmåga
-underlätta för svenska krisberedskapsaktörer att delta i och
ta del av resultat från EU:s ramprogram
- ett forum för dialog om behov och bidra till
utvecklingsmöjligheter och kunskapsförsörjning
- ge stöd i att använda EU-systemet för finansiering av
verksamhetsutveckling
Vad vill vi uppnå?
EU delfinansierar krisberedskapsutveckling i Sverige
Svenska krisberedskapsaktörer deltar aktivt i EU:s
ramprogram
Resultat från ramprogrammet kommer till nytta i Sverige
Aktiviteter för 2016 års ansökningar
Samla aktörer för genomgång av behov (20 oktober)
Presentation av plattformen när krisberedskapsaktörer möts
– tex idag, Mötesplats Samhällsäkerhet 24-25 nov
Nätverksmöte för ansökningsarbetet (januari)
– Syfte: underlätta bildande av konsortium med svenska deltagare
– Alla intresserade välkomna presentera projektidéer och/eller
kompetens
Information om utlysningen (vid behov)
– tex myndigheter, samverkansområden
Kontaktuppgifter
Anmäl intresse
via epost eller hemsida
plattform@foi.se
www.FOI.se/plattform
Lisa Hörnsten Friberg
tel 08 5550 38 59
Erfarenheter från beviljade
projekt
Erfarenheter från TRILLION
Erik Borglund Mittuniversitetet
Informationsmöte Säkra samhällen, Vinnova 5 November 2015
IDÉN
• TRILLION Trusted, Citizen – LEA colLaboration over sOcial Networks
• Community policing
• Using the TRILLION platform, citizens will be able to report crimes,
suspicious behaviour and incidents, identify hazards and assist law
enforcement agents through active participation for achieving better urban
security management. On the other hand, Law Enforcement Agencies
(LEAs) will be able to detect incidents in a more efficient, content and
context aware manner, locate on-site citizens, other LEA representatives and
first responders communicate with them, request more information and
assign them specific actions to address on-going incidents.
Event, site and date
62
Forts;
• To facilitate collaboration between citizens and LEAs, TRILLION provides
multiple channels for incident discovery, prediction, reporting and
interaction. Users will have the choice of using existing social networks or
directly report incidents via native mobile applications. Information
collected will be used to detect in real-time situations that are or may
become critical in the short to medium term.
63
Varför var detta ett europeiskt problem?
• Community policing var en del i call-texten
• Vi klev in i konsortiet när arbetet påbörjats, och fokus valts
• Ett tekniskt fokus med tydlig agenda på ”artefakt”
Event, site and date
64
Konsortium
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
ENGINEERING - INGEGNERIA INFORMATICA SPA, Italien
Technological Educational Institute of Piraeus , Grekland
ATOS SPAIN SA, Spanien
ETHNIKO KENTRO EREVNAS KAI TECHNOLOGIKIS ANAPTYXIS, Grekland
INOV INESC INOVACAO - INSTITUTO DE NOVAS TECNOLOGIAS, Portugal
UNIVERSITY OF GREENWICH, UK
Mittuniversitetet, Sverige
Dutch Institute for Technology, Safety & Security, Holland
XLAB RAZVOJ PROGRAMSKE OPREME IN SVETOVANJE DOO, Slovenien
CITTA DI LECCE*COMUNE DI LECCE, Italien
Ministério da Justiça Portugal
65
Vi kom med mm
• Var med i en tidigare FP7 ansökan med huvudsökanden
• Då medbjöds vi av forskningspartner
• Motpol mot ingenjörerna
• Samhällsvetenskaplig forskning
• Stark Samhällsvetenskaplig track-record
• De andra har stor erfarenhet kring STORA EU-projekt inom säkerhet
• Vi upplevde att vi var behövda
66
Varför ska man bry sig? Mervärde?
• Syns man inte finns man inte
• Lärorikt
• Kulturellt
• Kunskapsmässigt
• Access till kunskap som hade varit dold annars
• Sprida svensk forskning
• Sprida svensk praktik-kunnande
67
• Vi kan inte bygga den typ av komplexa system
• Vi kan inte nå den mängd intressenter utan våra partners
• Bidrar till ett bättre Europa
68
Utmaningar
• Kultur
• Samhällsvetenskap vs. Naturvetenskap/teknik
• Administration, Möten,
• NPM
• Kommunikation
69
Framgångsfaktorer
• Olikheter
• Tydliga WPn
• Tydliga leveranser
• En bra projektledning
• Dock för tidigt att säga mer…
Event, site and date
70
Lärdomar
• Se till att arbeta med några med tidigare framgång
• Se till att de som koordinerar ansökan har gott ”track record”
• Våga ”kill your darlings”
• Se till att den egna organisationen kan hantera ett positivt besked
71
MARIE TORSTENSSON LEVANDER
DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINOLOGY
City.Risks
AVOIDING AND MITIGATING SAFETY
RISKS IN URBAN ENVIRONMENTS
Marie Torstensson Levander
Department of Criminology, Malmö University
AVOIDING AND MITIGATING SAFETY
RISKS IN URBAN ENVIRONMENTS
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 653747
• Öka tryggheten och säkerheten i städer genom
teknikutveckling.
• 12 olika aktörer inom näringsliv, offentlig
verksamhet och forskning i sju EU-länder
inklusive 3 pilot-siter.
• Kriminologisk kunskap omsätts i praktiken
genom teknikprodukter riktade till allmänheten.
• Fokuserar bland annat på att underlätta
människors kommunikation och på att informera
om potentiella risker i urbana miljöer.
KONSORTIUM
• Space Hellas: koordinator (Grekland)
• Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communication
Systems FOKUS (Germany)
• Athena Research & Innovation Center in Information,
Communication and Knowledge Technologies
(Greece)
• SYNYO GmbH (Austria)
• Infili UK Ltd (United Kingdom)
• Institute of Communications and Computer Systems
– ICCS (Greece)
• Freie Universität Berlin (Germany)
• The Institute for Criminal Policy Research (United
Kingdom)
• Malmö University (Sweden)
VÅR ROLL: “ÖVERSÄTTA
KRIMINOLOGISK KUNSKAP TILL
TEKNISKA LÖSNINGAR”
• Initialfasen: Forskningsöversikt brottslighet i den
urbana miljön samt rädsla för brott/otrygghet
• Översikt förebyggande åtgärder för att påverka
brottslighet och öka trygghet i urbana miljöer.
• Senare del: Analysera data från pilotstäderna.
• Granska andras bidrag/rapporter.
HUR HAMNADE VI HÄR?
• Kontaktade av en grekisk deltagare i juli/augusti
2014.
• Snabb process: ”Institutionens CV”, lämpliga
forskare, doktorander, projektassistenter, beräkning
av kostnader.
• Stöd från MAH:s EU-handläggare och egna
ekonomer.
UTMANINGAR
(PRAKTISKA OCH KULTURELLA)
Procedurerna - alltid snabba, t.ex:
• Signering av dokument
• Rapportering (av personmånader)
• Orientera sig i olika hemsidor
• Formulera KPI:s, dvs Key Performance Indicators
• Medverka i telefonkonferenser där tekniken inte alltid
fungerar
• Olika bakgrund och kompetens hos deltagarna
FRAMGÅNGSFAKTORER:
SCORES 14/15
•
Konsortiets struktur: forskning, akademi, industri,
allmänhet, flervetenskapligt
•
Kompetens: Stark teoretisk bakgrund och stor
projekterfarenhet hos deltagarna. Kompletterande.
•
Tydlig och klar ansats
•
Användarna av produkten har en tydlig roll i projektet
•
Positivt bidrag till urban säkerhet
•
Hög grad av genomförbarhet.
MINUS
• Ingen expertis inom områden som antropologi, språk och participatorisk
forskning
LÄRDOMAR, ERFARENHETER OCH
REKOMMENDATIONER
• Finnas med så tidigt som möjligt för att bättre påverka projektets
innehåll och upplägg
• Kunde vi ha gjort andra delar i projektet (dvs rätt kompetens på rätt
plats)?
• Finns ett mervärde
FIKA och mingel!