ABERDEENSHIRE COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD WEDNESDAY, 26 NOVEMBER, 2014, at 1.00 P.M. Your attendance is requested at a meeting of the ABERDEENSHIRE COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD to be held in COMMITTEE ROOM 1, WOODHILL HOUSE, ABERDEEN on WEDNESDAY, 26 NOVEMBER, 2014, at 1.00 P.M. (with a sandwich lunch being available from 12.30 p.m.). 18 November, 2014 To: Director of Business Services Councillors J N Gifford, M C Kitts-Hayes, N J Smith and J J Strathdee. Contact Person:- Kirsty Macleod Tel: 01224 665103 Email:- Kirsty.macleod@aberdeenshire.gov.uk Community Planning Partnership Board 26 November 2014 1.00pm Committee Room 1, Woodhill House Aberdeen Networking lunch from 12.30pm onwards AGENDA Welcome, Introductions, Apologies and Declaration of Members’ Interest. 1. Action Sheet and Minute of Board Meeting of 24 September 2014 2. City Deals Fund Aberdeen City and Shire – Presentation by S. Archer 3. Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Development Plan 4. SOA Focus: Economic Recovery and Growth 5. SOA Focus: Transport 6. SOA Focus: Safer Communities and Reducing Reoffending 7. Serious and Organised Crime – Presentation by S. Scott 8. Commission on Strengthening Local Democracy 9. Improvement Plan Monitoring 10. Community Planning Partnership Budgets 2015/16 11. Total Place: Update (report to follow) INFORMATION: 12. Financial Monitoring Report 2014/15 13. CPP Benchmarking Framework 14. Local Strategic Assessments 2015 15. What Works Scotland: Update 16. 2014-2020 European Social Fund Allocation Please note, that whilst lead partners author the SOA Focus Reports, all partners are expected to contribute to discussions around each SOA Priority. PUBLIC SECTOR EQUALITY DUTY – GUIDANCE FOR BOARD MEMBERS What is the duty? In making decisions on the attached reports, Board Members are reminded of their legal duty under section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 to have due regard to the need to:(i) (ii) (iii) eliminate discrimination, harassment and victimisation; advance equality of opportunity between those who share a protected characteristic and persons who do not share it; and foster good relations between those who share a protected characteristic and persons who do not share it. The “protected characteristics” under the legislation are: age; disability; gender reassignment; pregnancy and maternity; race; religion or belief; sex; sexual orientation; and (in relation to point (i) above only) marriage and civil partnership. How can Board Members discharge the duty? To ‘have due regard’ means that in making decisions, Board Members must consciously consider the need to do the three things set out above. This requires a conscious approach and state of mind. The duty must influence the final decision. However, it is not a duty to achieve a particular result (e.g. to eliminate unlawful racial discrimination or to promote good relations between persons of different racial groups). It is a duty to have due regard to the need to achieve these goals. How much regard is ‘due’ will depend upon the circumstances and in particular on the relevance of the needs to the decision in question. The greater the relevance and potential impact that a decision may have on people with protected characteristics, the higher the regard required by the duty. What does this mean for CP Board decisions? Board Members are directed to the section in reports headed ‘Equalities, Staffing and Financial Implications’. This will indicate whether or not an Equality Impact Assessment (EIA) has been carried out as part of the development of the proposals and, if so, what the outcome of that assessment is. An EIA will be appended to a report where it is likely that the action recommended in the report could have a differential impact (either positive or negative) upon people from different protected groups. The report author will have assessed whether or not an EIA is required. If one is not required, the report author will explain why that is. Where an EIA is provided, Board Members should consider its contents and take those into account when reaching their decision. Board Members should also be satisfied that the assessment is sufficiently robust and that they have enough of an understanding of the issues to be able to discharge their legal duty satisfactorily. For more detailed guidance please refer to the following link:http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/uploaded_files/EqualityAct/psed_technical_guid ance_scotland.doc Engagement with Transport Scotland to resolve issues related to the retention period EW stipulated in the conditions of the Low Carbon Vehicle Procurement Support Scheme funding. Recommend that the Community Safety Partnership consider a focus on road safety for their CSm/IW next Citizen’s Panel Community Safety Survey 9 Submit response to National Community Planning Senior Officers Group re progress on SOA Development Priorities Circulation of further detail on the Local Community Planning Group budgets 11 12 Report back on the three Improvement Plan actions which were given an extended deadline of November 2014 11 10 Publicise the performance indicators highlighted as being of most interest to the public 2(ii) EW EW EW EW To research the introduction of a performance indicator related to serious organised crime, counter-terrorism and preventing radicalisation. 2(i) FA CSm Members commented on the absence of speed awareness courses in Scotland – share this information with CSP. Amend the performance indicator on accidental dwelling fires per 100,000 of the population to per 10,000 of the population (in line with Fire & Rescue Scotland) Lead Action 2(i) Agenda Item 2(i) Aberdeenshire Community Planning Board - Action Sheet from 24 Sept 2014 Y– Agenda Items 10 & 12 Y– Agenda Item 9 Y Y Y Y Y Completed Item: 1 Page: 1 Item: 1 Page: 2 ABERDEENSHIRE COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD WOODHILL HOUSE, ABERDEEN 24 SEPTEMBER, 2014 Present: Councillors J N Gifford (Chair), G Blackett, A Evison and M C Kitts-Hayes; Mr D Murray, NESTRANS; Mr A Coldwells, Aberdeenshire Alcohol and Drug Partnership, Aberdeenshire Health and Social Care Partnership; Mr D McCrindle, Scottish Enterprise; Mr M Salter, ACSEF; Mr R Bisset, NHS Grampian; Ms L Smith, Skills Development Scotland; Mr D Hekelaar, Aberdeenshire Voluntary Action; Mr J Loveday, Federation of Rural Partnerships, Chief Superintendent M McLaren, Police Scotland; Mr D Rout, Scottish Fire and Rescue Service; Ms F Osowska, Scottish Government. Apologies: Councillors N Smith and J J Strathdee; Mr R Johnson, Director of Communities. Officers: Ms E Wood, Strategic Development Officer (Community Planning); Ms F Ainsworth, Partnership Analyst; Mr A Macleod, Housing Strategy and Community Planning Manager; Mr I Wallace, Community Planning Support Officer; Mr A Stewart, Health and Transport Action Plan Programme Manager; Mr A Griffiths, Head of Primary Education and Curriculum Development, Mr R. Walkinshaw, Building and Facilities Manager, and Ms K Macleod, Committee Officer. DECLARATION OF MEMBERS’ INTERESTS No interests were declared in respect of the Declaration of Members’ Interests as required by the Code of Conduct for Members. PUBLIC SECTOR EQUALITY DUTY In making decisions on the following items of business, the Board agreed, in terms of Section 149 of the Equality Act, 2010:(1) to have due regard to the need to:(a) (b) (c) (2) eliminate discrimination, harassment and victimisation; advance equality of opportunity between those who share a protected characteristic and persons who do not share it; and foster good relations between those who share a protected characteristic and persons who do not share it. where an Equality Impact Assessment was provided, to consider its contents and take those into account when reaching their decision. 1. MINUTE OF BOARD MEETING OF 11 JUNE, 2014 There had been circulated and was approved the Minute of Meeting of the Community Planning Board of 11 June, 2014. 2. (i) SINGLE OUTCOME AGREEMENT ANNUAL REPORT 2013/14 There had been circulated a report dated 20 August, 2014, by the Partnership Analyst, which provided the Board with the annual report on Aberdeenshire Community Planning Partnership’s performance in delivering the Single Outcome Agreement. Item: 1 Page: 3 The Partnership Analyst introduced the report and explained that progress was measured by a number of performance indicators which had been approved by the Board and Scottish Government when the 2013-2023 Single Outcome Agreement was published. Indicators which had demonstrated particularly positive or negative performance were highlighted in the areas of early years, economic growth and transport, employment, health inequalities, older people, safer communities, and stronger communities. The covering report also advised that the Community Planning Executive had recommended the removal of 11 indicators which did not have an identified data source, until a data source or replacement indicator could be found. During discussion members raised concerns about availability of affordable housing; considered the effects of a growing economy if not matched by infrastructure; stressed the importance of officer awareness of community action plans; and were provided with further information on the issue of delayed discharge. Members also queried the data on public satisfaction with local public services as this conflicted with the findings of other reputation trackers. The Police representative requested that the Board considered introducing a performance indicator related to serious organised crime, counter-terrorism and preventing radicalisation, in response to the UK terrorism threat level being raised. He also advised the board on research undertaken by the Community Safety Partnership to analyse the causes of the high number of serious and fatal road collisions in Aberdeenshire. This research identified factors including the proportion of country rounds, higher than average household access to a vehicle and cumulative distances travelled. Members also commented on the absence of speed awareness courses in Scotland. The Community Planning Board agreed:(1) to approve the draft 2013/14 annual report for the Single Outcome Agreement; (2) to approve the removal/replacement of indicators with no current data source; (3) to amend the performance indicator on accidental dwelling fires per 100,000 of the population, to per 10,000 of the population, in order to standardise with the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service Strategic Plan; and (4) to look into introducing a performance indicator related to serious organised crime, counter-terrorism and preventing radicalisation. 2. (ii) COMMUNICATIONS PLAN FOR SINGLE OUTCOME AGREEMENT ANNUAL REPORT 2013-14 There had been circulated a report dated September 2014, by the Strategic Development Officer (Community Planning), which asked the Board to consider the key messages and specific performance indicators that should be publicised by Community Planning Partners following approval of the Single Outcome Agreement Annual Report 2013-14. Following discussion, the Community Planning Board agreed to publicise those performance indicators which were highlighted as being of most interest to the public, as detailed in the report, with the addition of the following indicators: Number of affordable homes developed; Number of bed days lost to delayed discharge; and Number of persons killed or seriously injured in road collisions. Item: 1 Page: 4 3. PROGRAMME OF SCRUTINY FOR PARTNERSHIP PRIORITIES 2014/15 There had been circulated a report dated September 2014, by the Strategic Development Officer (Community Planning), which reminded the Board that during the past year the Community Planning Partnership Executive and Board had dedicated time on their agenda to scrutinising the priorities set in the Single Outcome Agreement using an agreed template. The report proposed that the Executive and Board continue to scrutinise each priority on an annual cycle and detailed a draft programme. The Community Planning Board agreed:(1) the draft programme of scrutiny of the priorities as set out in the Single Outcome Agreement; and (2) to note and endorse the continuing use of the current format that was used to encourage a culture of “support and challenge” and meet expectations in terms of performance management, prevention and resource shift. 4. GETTING IT RIGHT FOR EVERY CHILD There had been circulated a report dated 8 September, 2014, by the Housing Strategy and Community Planning Manager, on proposed arrangements for Getting it Right for Every Child (GIRFEC) in Aberdeenshire from 2014-2017. The report explained that over the last 18 months the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act and the Public Bodies (Joint Working) (Scotland) Act had passed into legislation. As a result, Councils, Health Boards and other partners had reviewed their approach to GIRFEC. The proposed arrangements for GIRFEC in Aberdeenshire were detailed in the appendix to the report and section 4, which concerned the role of the Community Planning Partnership, was highlighted as being of particular interest to the Board. The Community Planning Board agreed:(1) to receive, on an annual basis (or more frequently as required), an update on Getting it Right for Every Child (GIRFEC) arrangements and implementation; (2) that the annual update would include a multi-agency update from the GIRFEC Leadership Group and a single-agency update from each of the community planning partners; and (3) to ensure that partner business/service plans for children were aligned with each other and with the forthcoming Integrated Children’s Services Plan for 2015-18. 5. TOTAL PLACE FRASERBURGH: DEVELOPING AN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN With reference to the Minute of Meeting of 11 June, 2014, (Item 4), when the Board had agreed that a Total Place pilot should be progressed in Fraserburgh, there had been circulated a joint report dated September 2014, by the Banff and Buchan Area Manager, the Housing Strategy and Community Planning Manager, and the Strategic Development Officer (Community Planning), which provided the Board with a progress update on the Total Place pilot. The report explained that the Aberdeenshire Alcohol and Drug Partnership (ADP) had agreed to support the proposed pilot as this would complement planned service improvement work in Peterhead and Huntly. The only concern expressed related to the current capacity of ADP staff. A small group of relevant partner representatives had met on 27 August, 2014 to discuss the focus of the project, anticipated benefits and outcomes, measuring project success, Item: 1 Page: 5 management structure and project support, partner involvement, resources, and next steps. In order to move forward with the pilot, an implementation and resourcing plan required to be drafted and would be reported to the Board in due course. The Community Planning Board agreed to note the progress on the Total Place pilot in Aberdeenshire. 6. LOCAL COMMUNITY PLANS: 2013-14 ANNUAL REPORTS There had been circulated a report dated 12 September, 2014, by the Strategic Development Officer (Community Planning), which explained that the six Local Community Plans had been endorsed by the Board on 25 September, 2013 (Item 7). The plans were reviewed annually to account for any emerging priorities and an annual report was produced for each area to showcase achievements and report on progress. Each area had produced a short annual report for wide circulation and more detailed case studies to provide in-depth information for board members. The Community Planning Board reviewed, and agreed to endorse, the six Local Community Plan Annual Reports for 2013-14 and the associated case study information for each area. 7. COMMUNITY ASSET TRANSFER There had been circulated a report dated 12 September, 2014, by the Director of Business Services, which provided the Board with information on the Council’s Community Asset Transfer Policy; explained that there had been a total of 13 transfers since the policy had been approved in June 2011; and encouraged Partners to consider how a similar approach could be used to transfer assets they no longer required to a community or voluntary organisation. Following discussion, the Community Planning Board agreed to note the Council’s approach to Community Asset Transfer and the extent to which a similar approach to physical assets no longer required for core service delivery purposes could be adopted by Partners. 8. REFRESHED GRAMPIAN HEALTH AND TRANSPORT ACTION PLAN There had been circulated a report dated 6 August, 2014, by the Health and Transport Action Plan Programme Manager, which presented the refreshed Grampian Health and Transport Action Plan to the Board. The Health and Transport Action Plan Programme Manager introduced the report and explained that the Plan had been refreshed in response to financial, social and political changes since its approval in 2008. The purpose of the Plan was to enable providers of transport, health and social care services to work together in a more co-ordinated manner in order to improve outcomes and efficiency of service delivery, both in reducing the adverse impacts of transport choices on public health and in improving access to health and social care. During discussion members raised concerns about challenges facing the Scottish Ambulance Service and their capacity to respond to emergencies. Members also asked questions on delivering the plan in practice, accountability and progress reporting arrangements. The Community Planning Board agreed to endorse the refreshed Grampian Health and Transport Action Plan (HTAP) and accept ownership and responsibility for delivery of the Plan to enshrine the work into collaborative working practices, along with the Community Planning Boards in Moray and Aberdeen City. Item: 1 Page: 6 9. LOW CARBON VEHICLE SCHEME – OPTIONS FOR FUTURE VEHICLE USE There had been circulated a report dated 11 August, 2014, by the Community Planning Support Officer, which provided the board with background information on electric vehicles which had been purchased using gap funding from the Low Carbon Vehicle Procurement Support Scheme and detailed the options available to the Board for the future use or disposal of the vehicles, together with an individual Strength, Weakness, Opportunity and Threat (SWOT) analysis for each option. The Community Planning Board agreed:(1) to note the various options provided in the options report; (2) that they wished to take the least costly option and dispose of the electric vehicles as soon as practical, following engagement with Transport Scotland to resolve issues related to the retention period stipulated in the conditions of the Low Carbon Vehicle Procurement Support Scheme funding; and (3) to endorse the continuation of the Shared Mail Run pilot. 10. ABERDEENSHIRE CITIZENS’ PANEL – ANNUAL CONSULTATION PLAN There had been circulated a report dated 20 August, 2014, by the Community Planning Support Officer, which explained that the Aberdeenshire Citizens’ Panel undertook four surveys per year, with topics determined annually in advance. It was proposed that the next programme of surveys would commence in November 2014, with further surveys occurring in February, May and August, 2015. Following consultation with partnership stakeholders a number of potential topics had been nominated. The draft Annual Consultation Plan was provided as an appendix to the report for the Board’s consideration. The Community Planning Board agreed:(1) to recommend that the Community Safety Partnership considered a focus on road safety for their next Citizen’s Panel Community Safety Survey, in light of poor performance on road casualties identified in the Single Outcome Agreement Annual Report.; and (2) to endorse the draft Annual Consultation Plan for the Aberdeenshire Citizens’ Panel for the forthcoming year, as detailed in Appendix 1 to the report. 11. IMPROVEMENT PLAN MONITORING There had been circulated a report dated September 2014, by the Strategic Development Officer (Community Planning), which updated the Board on progress made against actions agreed in the Community Planning Partnership’s Improvement Plan 2014/15 and sought agreement to extend the deadline for three actions that had passed their deadline or were about to do so. A letter from the Chair of the National Community Planning Group (NCPG), was included as an appendix to the report and provided an update on the National Community Planning Group meeting of 10 June, 2014 and indicated the group’s intention to consider what further national leadership could be provided to support Community Planning Partnerships (CPPs) at its meeting on 18 November, 2014. A further letter had been circulated, from the National Community Planning Senior Officers Group, which requested a progress update from Community Planning Partnerships and input on whether specific further support would assist ongoing development work, in order to advise the NCPG. The Community Planning Board agreed:- Item: 1 Page: 7 (1) to note the Improvement Plan for 2014/15; (2) to an extension of deadlines to November, 2014 for the three actions showing as ‘red’ or ‘amber’; (3) to note the information from the recent National Community Planning Group meeting; and (4) to note the letter and request for a response from the National Community Planning Senior Officers Group. 12. FINANCIAL MONITORING REPORT 2014/15 There had been circulated a report dated September, 2014, by the Strategic Development Officer (Community Planning), which provided the Board with budget monitoring information for the Community Planning budget and Local Community Planning Group budgets 2014/15 as at the end of August 2014. With regards to the Community Planning budget it was highlighted that there was an unallocated sum of £19,004 which was due to a carry-over from 2013/14 and approximately £6,000 remaining unallocated for 2014/15. As previously agreed, a Communications Intern would be funded and candidates had been shortlisted. An allocation for potential citizens’ panel focus groups had been provisionally agreed and the Our Aberdeenshire website had recently been upgraded at low cost. Local Community Planning Group budgets were still being allocated and it was expected more details would be available in the next financial monitoring report. The Community Planning Board noted the budget monitoring report for 2014/15 as at the end of August, 2014 for the Community Planning budget and Local Community Planning budgets. 13. RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION IN THE NORTH EAST OF SCOTLAND There had been circulated, as a late item, an update on issues related to recruitment and retention in the North East of Scotland. The Board noted the update and requested that the item be circulated again to Board members following the meeting. 14. WHAT WORKS SCOTLAND There had been circulated a report dated September, 2014, by the Strategic Development Officer (Community Planning), which explained that What Works Scotland was a new initiative which aimed to improve the way local areas used evidence to make decisions about public service development and reform. Aberdeenshire Council, as the lead partner in the Community Planning Partnership, had submitted an expression of interest to take part as a case study area and had been successful in being selected. Detailed information on the initiative and Aberdeenshire’s expression of interest were included in an appendix to the report. The Community Planning Board noted Aberdeenshire Community Planning Partnership’s involvement in the national What Works Scotland initiative. Item: 3 Page: 1 ABERDEENSHIRE COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD – 26 NOVEMBER 2014 ABERDEEN CITY AND SHIRE STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN – APPROVED BY SCOTTISH MINISTERS 1 Recommendations The Board is recommended to: 1.1 Note the approval of the Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Development Plan by Scottish Ministers, the contribution it makes to meeting a range of Single Outcome Agreement objectives and the process for review. 2 Background 2.1 The Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Development Plan (SDP) is a strategic plan covering the areas of Aberdeen City Council and Aberdeenshire Council (except that part within the Cairngorms National Park) and looks forward over the next 20 years. The preparation of the plan is a statutory requirement and replaces the requirement to prepare a structure plan. The plan addresses the development needs of the area, with a particular focus on housing, employment, transport and energy. 2.2 The plan is prepared on behalf of the two partner councils by the Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Development Planning Authority (SDPA). The SDPA was formed in 2008 and is made up of six Councillors from Aberdeen City Council and six from Aberdeenshire Council and is serviced by a small dedicated team. It meets at least quarterly and Audit Scotland is responsible for auditing its accounts. 2.3 The current SDP was approved by Scottish Ministers on 28 March 2014 and came into force with immediate effect. The plan is available online (http://www.aberdeencityandshiresdpa.gov.uk/nmsruntime/saveasdialog.asp?lID=1111&sID=149) with hard copies available for circulation at the meeting. 2.4 The new plan updates the Aberdeen City and Shire Structure Plan (2009), retaining its strategy and growth aspirations. Both councils prepare Local Development Plans as one of the main mechanisms to implement the SDP, although a range of other actions are included in the Action Programme published in June 2014. There are close links with Nestrans and ACSEF in terms of plan preparation and implementation. 2.5 The SDP is a positive plan for the future of the area, identifying the need for a significant expansion of housing and employment land which have now been delivered through the Local Development Plans in terms of site allocations. This has enabled significant take-up of employment land over recent years (particularly in and around Aberdeen) as well as record levels of house building predicted from 2015 onwards. Indeed, the area now has one of the healthiest supplies of effective development land anywhere in Scotland, with significant investment in supporting infrastructure planned over the next few years. Item: 3 Page: 2 2.6 The timing of the recession starting in 2008 had a negative impact on the area because the availability of development and mortgage finance has meant that the supply of new homes has not kept up with the needs of the economy which has grown four times faster than the Scottish average since that time. However, with this situation easing, it is now anticipated that building will reach levels not seen since at least 1980. Review and Replacement 2.7 The legislation requires the submission of a replacement plan to Scottish Ministers within four years of the approval of the last one, giving a submission target of March 2018. As a consequence, the process of preparing a replacement plan will start in earnest during 2015, with a timetable and process being agreed by the SDPA at its meeting in March 2015. Most of the consultation and engagement with communities, stakeholders and partners is anticipated during 2016, with a ‘Proposed Plan’ published during 2017 for objections prior to submission. 2.8 Although the Aberdeenshire Community Planning Partnership considered the Main Issues Report for the last plan in November 2011 and encouraged partners to engage in the plan preparation process, it is important that the links between the two planning processes are further strengthened. This has been highlighted by the Scottish Government with its publication of Scottish Planning Policy (para 12 and page 8 http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/0045/00453827.pdf) and its response to ‘Review of Strategic Development Plans in Scotland’ (Action 12 http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/0045/00454434.pdf). The Royal Town Planning Institute in Scotland is also currently researching the link between community planning and development planning, with a view to identifying ways in which this relationship can be strengthened. 2.9 The period to 2040 covered by the next plan will be critical for the future of the area and it is important that the SDP plays its role in shaping that future for the benefit of both current and future generations. 2.10 Over the next few months officers will consider further how the links between community planning and the SDP can most effectively be enhanced in Aberdeenshire as well as in Aberdeen City – seeking to better integrate the plans but also the respective processes. 3 Equalities, Staffing and Financial Implications 3.1 None arising from this report. David Jennings, SDP Manager Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Development Planning Authority 17 November 2014 Item: 4 Page: 1 ABERDEENSHIRE COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD – 26 NOVEMBER 2014 SOA FOCUS: ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND GROWTH 1 Recommendations: 1.1 Discuss the progress made by ACSEF in delivering the outcomes set out in the Single Outcome Agreement. 1.2 Support activity by demonstrating how each partner is contributing towards the “economic recovery and growth” priority. 1.3 Challenge performance as part of the partnership’s governance role to be satisfied that we are collectively doing as much as we can to improve outcomes, plan preventatively and join up resources. 2 Background / Discussion 2.1 During the previous year the Community Planning Partnership Executive and Board has dedicated time on its agenda to scrutinising the priorities set in the Single Outcome Agreement. At its last meeting the Board agreed a forward programme of “support and challenge” of its priorities stretching through to summer 2015. 2.2 The template in appendix 1 has been completed by members of ACSEF is framed around the themes of prevention, resources, place and performance. 2.3 Board members are asked to show how their organisation is contributing towards the long-term outcome “Aberdeenshire will be recognised as a great place to live, work, invest with opportunity for all” as well as the specific themes highlighted in the template. 2.4 In light of Community Planning Partnerships being held responsible for improving outcomes for each of their priority areas, Board members are encouraged to challenge progress to date. 3 Equalities, Staffing and Financial Implications 3.1 The recent agreement on joint resourcing and community planning partnerships published as part of the Scottish budget for 2014/15 places further emphasis on partners demonstrating how they can pool their shared resources – budgets, staff, buildings, information – to deliver improvements for their shared priorities. 3.2 This report does not require an equalities impact assessment because its recommendations do not have a differential impact on people with protected characteristics. Jamie Bell, Business Networks and Communications, Scottish Enterprise and Sophie Humphries, Strategic Development Officer (Community Planning) 14 November 2014 Overall, current modelling projects that over 90% of Aberdeenshire premises will be “passed by fibre” at the conclusion of the programme Aberdeenshire Council has committed £16m to provide acceptable and affordable broadband to those at the “poor” end of the service spectrum within the Scottish Government’s ‘Rest of Scotland, Step Change 2015’ programme. The first publicly funded fibre optic cable street cabinet in Scotland was commissioned in Kirkton of Skene in April and since then a further 77 cabinets have been sited in Aberdeenshire. As at the end of September, an additional 22,000 premises in Aberdeenshire have been given access to a fibre optic cable enabled broadband service. Solutions for those premises in Aberdeenshire which won’t receive a fibre enabled service will start to be delivered in spring 2015. Digital Connectivity –Access to high speed broadband is vital for continued economic growth, social inclusion and cohesion and cost effective service provision for public and private sector organisations. It is truly cross-cutting which impacts all communities and will have significant impacts on delivery of services such as education, healthcare and welfare. Examples of these with relevance to Aberdeenshire are provided below: ACSEF has a set of agreed priorities and major projects for 2014/15 underpinned by a focus on place. Subsequent 5-year Economic Action Plans have set out the priority actions to be delivered to achieve the region’s economic growth target. The ACSEF strategy is currently being refreshed to review economic priorities along with the development of a performance plan to monitor and track progress. The Economic Manifesto for Aberdeen City and Shire published by ACSEF sets out three elements: an ambitious Vision for 2025; two overarching aims of Quality of Life and Economic Growth; and seven Strategic Priorities which will help deliver the vision. The Scottish Government Economic Strategy sets out high level targets for increasing sustainable economic growth. Economic growth and getting people into employment is a key preventative measure to prevent the health and social problems associated with unemployment and poverty. It should also be viewed as an opportunity as by investing in the opportunities and needs of Aberdeenshire’s economy this will prevent the risks associated with economic downturn and decline. PREVENTION – How is the partnership taking shifting towards preventative planning? Are resources being shifted? Aberdeen City and Shire Economic Future (ACSEF) LEAD PARTNERSHIP: Economic Recovery & Growth SOA PRIORITY: Item: 4 Page: 2 Food & Drink Strategy – ACSEF has recognised the importance of food & drink as a key sector for the region and particularly for Aberdeenshire. In understanding the opportunities and barriers to further growth ACSEF has funded the development of the Aberdeenshire, Aberdeen City and Moray In addition, a number of collaborative projects are being worked on in conjunction with the Area Tourism Partnership, Banffshire Coast Tourism Partnership and VistAberdeen. These include for example, the World Host Customer Service Programme; helping the region become one of the most welcoming tourist destinations, and an innovative online training programme for front facing staff to help develop their destination knowledge at a regional level across Aberdeen City and Shire. Through Scottish Enterprise support to the Royal Deeside and the Cairngorms destination several projects have recently been successfully delivered. The 2nd Food and Fiddle Fortnight took place Oct 2014. It is recognised that the Deeside Way is a valuable asset to the area and work has been done to look at the business development opportunities afforded by a completed Deeside Way from Aberdeen to Ballater. A Deeside Accommodation Development Support Programme has been followed up with workshops delivered to businesses to help improve their skills and quality offering to visitors. Area Tourism Partnership – The Area Tourism Partnership for the region is established and now driving forward its strategy. The partnership consists of all tourism sectors, including private businesses, the relevant public agencies and the Destination Management Organisations in the region (including Banffshire Coast, and Royal Deeside & Cairngorms.). It provides visible leadership, acting as a champion for tourism businesses, with key goals in delivering the strategy by bringing all the parties involved in visitors' journey together, to ensure that Aberdeen City and Shire reaches its potential as a tourism destination. Key actions planned for delivery include Achievement of ‘World Host’ status for AC&S (2016) with Customer Service training programme already held, AC&S Tourism Awards (January 2015), Area Tourism Conference (January 2015) and production of Hotel Investment brochure (2015). Balmacassie Commercial Park in Ellon is well established and will be added to by the recently announced eight hectare Enerfield site, to the north of Foveran. The low carbon Energetica Industry Park in Peterhead will soon undergo first phase development whilst Peterhead Power Station was named as one of two preferred bidders for the UK Government’s Carbon Capture and Storage project – potentially seeing £1billion of investment. At the south end of the ‘corridor’ there has been huge investment in business park developments around Aberdeen Airport and further investment in the Aberdeen Science & Energy Parks. Provision of business space is vital to build upon our buoyant energy sector and secure increased investment for the future. Energetica – Delivery of the Energetica masterplan is a major strand of several ACSEF priorities, particularly anchoring the offshore energy supply chain and supporting place promotion for the region. Energetica aims to extend opportunities for business growth on the corridor north of the City to Peterhead, and establish the region as a leader in future energy technologies, to provide jobs and investment for the future. The project has the potential to create hundreds of new jobs and £750 million of investment. Item: 4 Page: 3 Company Growth - Scottish Enterprise currently account manages 124 companies in Aberdeenshire across a number of sectors, representing about 39% of the region’s total account managed companies. This involves working intensively with the senior management team of a company to agree objectives across business functions e.g. exporting, investment, human resources, strategic development, to develop and grow their companies which will, in turn, lead to opportunities to expand and subsequently increase future employment levels. Scottish Enterprise is actively growing its company growth portfolio and increasing the amount of account managers to deliver this. Aberdeenshire Council’s business support staff give advice and Transport – An integrated transport network remains an important priority for ACSEF, as it is a key enabler in terms of ensuring sustainable economic growth. Key projects to promote an integrated, sustainable transport network, particularly in order to reduce congestion, are consistently highlighted as a major priority for the region. These are delivered in partnership with Nestrans. Key infrastructure projects, including the AWPR, Balmedie-Tipperty dualling, and Inveramsay Bridge improvements, together with rail network enhancements will take place over the next few years and provide the region with fit for purpose infrastructure that will allow companies to grow and provide jobs for the future. Under this theme ACSEF has this year developed a stronger focus on the region’s ports and harbours in the context of a wider strategic review of Scotland’s ports linked to the demands arising from the energy sector in particular. Housing – Ensuring affordable housing available to facilitate economic growth has been identified as a key issue as lack of suitable housing is causing problems in terms of attracting and retaining talent in the region. There are clearly wider social impacts resulting from this issue. The working group brought together with representatives from ACSEF together with officers from both Aberdeen City and Aberdeenshire Council’s Housing teams will look to develop innovative solutions to the challenges currently faced. Discussions with colleagues from the Scottish Government have taken place and will be ongoing. ACSEF has agreed funding support to undertake a Housing Needs Study to identify need and demand for key housing relative to the private sector. The aim of the research is to provide ACSEF with potential models for the supply of housing to meet current and emerging needs of employing organisations in the private sector. Aberdeenshire Council’s Placemaking initiative “Be Part of the Picture” has been established to promote the area’s strengths and sense of place. It looks to share information on what Aberdeenshire has to offer, and aims to help in attracting new visitors and businesses to Aberdeenshire, which ultimately benefits everyone. Skills and Talent Attraction – Ensuring a consistent stream of talent for local businesses and inward investors is of paramount importance to future growth in the region. There are two aspects to talent attraction; attracting new talent from the UK or overseas and retaining and maximising the potential of indigenous talent, including creating pathways for young people from school to jobs. Led by Skills Development Scotland Regional Skills Assessments have been prepared for the region in 2014, primarily to inform the single outcome agreements for the new regional college structure in Scotland. ACSEF has played a key role in inputting to and helping shape the RSA for AC&S. Based on these findings ACSEF has now agreed to develop a Regional Skills Strategy. Food & Drink Strategy and Action Plan 2015-2020. The work is currently underway and being led by Grampian Food Forum and Aberdeenshire Council. A draft strategy is expected early in 2015. Item: 4 Page: 4 In a wider strategic sense there is recognition that the lack of consistent place promotion messaging is detrimental to the overall work of ACSEF and its public and private sector partners. This is an important issue in portraying a positive perception of the region and in attracting greater levels of inward ACSEF and its partners will support Aberdeenshire Council with the delivery of their Placemaking initiative, “Be part of the picture”, where relevant. The attractiveness of place is critical in attracting and retaining the talent to support the area’s economic growth ambitions – with the place promotion agenda essentially underpinning the work of ACSEF at present. Constraints around infrastructure in rural areas, particularly around lack of broadband availability, with the subsequent restrictions on growth opportunities and social inclusion, have been identified as a key priority for the partnership. Whilst Aberdeenshire scores above the national average for employment rates and being a good place to live, there is recognition that there are significant differences in wealth and opportunity across the area. PLACE – To what extent is the partnership focussing on place? The private sector currently contributes through in-kind support. The aim of ACSEF is to create the right conditions for growth that will attract private sector investment. Specific projects that form part of the ACSEF action plan will attract private sector funding e.g. Energetica. Alongside the contributions made by the partners to the ACSEF budget, there is over £70million of additional funding forecast to projects which will support of delivery of the Economic Action Plan for Aberdeen City and Shire. ACSEF is funded by Aberdeen City and Aberdeenshire Councils, along with Scottish Enterprise. The partners’ funding provides support to both strategy and project development to facilitate joined-up working in economic development across the region. Other partners provide support through research initiatives and events that contribute directly to the work of the partnership e.g. Aberdeen & Grampian Chamber of Commerce. RESOURCES – To what extent is the partnership and its members jointly resourcing the shared outcomes? Internationalisation – locally both the oil and gas and food and drink sectors have significant experience of international working, gained over many years and it is recognised that this is an important area of focus from which other sectors can benefit. ACSEF is developing an approach to stimulating greater internationalisation opportunities for companies across a range of sectors, including not just exporting, but also developing an international mindset and building on global value chains. support to developing businesses and liaise with colleagues in Business Gateway and Scottish Enterprise to ensure coverage of businesses that provide additionality to the Aberdeenshire economy. Item: 4 Page: 5 For the SOA specifically, the following performance information is provided: As part of its overall strategy review and update, ACSEF is also refreshing its Performance Framework, with Key Performance Indicators. These will include monitoring the performance of the Area Tourism Partnership. The Energetica project has recently developed an agreed set of performance measures which are currently being informed by data provision and tracking information. PERFORMANCE – How is the partnership performing in delivering the outcomes and plan set out in the Single Outcome Agreement? A key element of Energetica is the promotion of Aberdeenshire’s coastal scenery and wildlife, for example the second Energetica Wildlife and Walking Festival held in May 2014. The festival was supported by local business throughout the area. More specifically, ACSEF partners will support the delivery of Economic Development and Regeneration Strategies, by assisting in scaling up and developing relevant economic and employment opportunities that align with the focus on growth – for example, by working with Fraserburgh Harbour to upgrade the electricity supply at the harbour and environs potentially benefiting over 40 companies. In a tourism context there has been significant support to the area’s two destination management organisations – Royal Deeside and Banffshire Coast – supportive place promoting initiatives. investment to the region as a whole. In response ACSEF is currently developing a set of consistent economic promotion messages along with funding support to the creation of a Regional Statistics Guide and Regional Image Bank. Item: 4 Page: 6 GVA per head at the regional Aberdeen City & Shire level is £31,754 (2012 – latest), the highest in the country and well above Scottish (£20,013) and UK (£21,674) averages. Since 2001 in AC&S GVA per head (current prices) has increased from £20,319.In real price terms this equates to a 10 year annual average growth rate of 1.6% per annum. Economic Growth, as measured by the Gross Value Added (GVA) measure, is only available publicly from official Government figures at a regional level. Overall GVA growth rates fluctuate over the time period, but since 2002 the increase in growth averages at 2.6% p.a., above both Scottish and UK averages. It is also higher than ACSEF’s long term economic growth target of 2.5% p.a. Although the recession did have an impact on GVA in 2008/09 in AC&S, the region bounced back quickly. In 2012 there has been a dropoff in growth, with some potential links to North Sea production levels. Any trends will continue to be monitored over time. Item: 4 Page: 7 Alongside Economic Growth the ACSEF economic manifesto and plan includes a vision of the area as being one of the most interesting and enjoyable locations in the UK in which to visit, live, work and grow up. In short: having a high quality of life. ACSEF monitors this ambition in several ways. The strong entrepreneurial environment is reinforced by figures for Aberdeenshire where business formations per 10,000 working population have increased from 53 to 77 (2009-12) – the second highest rate in Scotland behind Aberdeen City (84). Aberdeen City and Shire has the highest business birth rate (80 per 10,000 working population) compared to Scotland (53) and UK (69). This has increased from 55 in 2009. The tightness of the labour market in Aberdeenshire is further reinforced by the lowest unemployment rates in the country, including youth unemployment. Actual levels of employment have also increased in Aberdeenshire since 2005 by 11.5% from 118,800 to 132,500. This is despite a slight fall in 2014 by 2,000. This compares to Scotland-wide employment that increased by 2.8% over the same period. Regionally, Aberdeen City & Shire has the highest employment rate in the country at 77.0% (2014 figures just released) and well above national averages (Scotland – 71.5%; UK – 71.6%). At a local authority area level Aberdeenshire has the third highest rate in Scotland (only behind Orkney and Shetland) reflective of a buoyant economy and employment opportunities in the area’s key sectors. Since 2005 Aberdeenshire’s employment rate has remained consistently around 80%. Item: 4 Page: 8 1= Very Poor 2 3 4 5 6 7= Very Good 2014 2012 The % of Aberdeenshire Citizens’ Panel respondents who rated their quality of life Quality of Life Ranking 2012 1 2 3 4 5 Quality of Life Ranking 2011 2 1 4 6 9 Labour market The Bank of Scotland Quality of Life index was produced for 12 ‘rural’ defined local authority areas across Scotland and quantifies living standards by ranking performance of areas across several indicators: Aberdeenshire Shetland Islands Orkney Islands East Lothian Scottish Borders Local Authority Bank of Scotland Quality of Life Rural Survey The Bank of Scotland’s annual Rural Areas’ Quality of Life Survey found that in 2012 Aberdeenshire had the best quality of life of any rural local authority area in Scotland (see below). Aberdeenshire has claimed top position for the 4 th time since 2006. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 2014 Aberdeen City & Shire Quality of Life Surveys Both Aberdeen City and Aberdeenshire Councils, through their respective Citizens’ Panels, tracked what its residents defined as most relevant and important to their quality of life. In Aberdeenshire panellists indicated overall high positive ratings of their quality of life – an increase from 2 years ago (see below). Improved perceptions of broadband speeds and connections, access to parks and open spaces and choice of restaurants and bars were recorded in the survey. However, indicators which panellists selected as being ‘worse’ than two years ago included maintenance of roads, levels of traffic congestion, availability of affordable housing and cost of living. Item: 4 Page: 9 Housing Environment Safety/Security Health Education Item: 4 Page: 10 Item: 5 Page: 1 ABERDEENSHIRE COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD – 26 NOVEMBER 2014 SOA FOCUS: TRANSPORT 1 Recommendations: 1.1 Discuss the progress made by NESTRANS and partners in delivering the outcomes set out in the Single Outcome Agreement. 1.2 Support activity by demonstrating how each partner is contributing towards the “transport” priority. 1.3 Challenge performance as part of the partnership’s governance role to be satisfied that we are collectively doing as much as we can to improve outcomes, plan preventatively and join up resources. 2 Background / Discussion 2.1 During the previous year the Community Planning Partnership Executive and Board has dedicated time on its agenda to scrutinising the priorities set in the Single Outcome Agreement. At its last meeting the Board agreed a forward programme of “support and challenge” of its priorities stretching through to summer 2015. 2.2 The template in appendix 1 is framed around the themes of prevention, resources, place and performance. 2.3 Board members are asked to show how their organisation is contributing towards the long-term outcome “businesses and individuals have access to an integrated transport network” as well as the specific themes highlighted in the template. 2.4 In light of Community Planning Partnerships being held responsible for improving outcomes for each of their priority areas, Board members are encouraged to challenge progress to date. 3 Equalities, Staffing and Financial Implications 3.1 The recent agreement on joint resourcing and community planning partnerships published as part of the Scottish budget for 2014/15 places further emphasis on partners demonstrating how they can pool their shared resources – budgets, staff, buildings, information – to deliver improvements for their shared priorities. 3.2 This report does not require an equalities impact assessment because its recommendations do not have a differential impact on people with protected characteristics. Kirsty Chalmers, Transport Executive (Strategy and Delivery), NESTRANS, and Sophie Humphries, Strategic Development Officer (Community Planning) Aberdeenshire Council 06 November 2014 Aberdeenshire Council continues to operate a range of supported bus services, DRT and community transport services providing vital links for the communities and people that they serve and helping to improve accessibility and prevent social exclusion. Through its Road Asset Management Plan, Aberdeenshire Council continues to make considerable investment in preventative road resurfacing and dressing programmes. Funding is also allocated on an annual basis in the Nestrans budget for strategic prioritised maintenance. In 2013/14 Nestrans has also invested in road safety improvements with phase 2 of the bend improvement strategy on the A947 and localised surfacing, drainage and lining measures to improve safety and prevent accidents. These improvements have been delivered by Aberdeenshire Council with funding from Nestrans. Continued investment in cycling and walking infrastructure by both Nestrans and Aberdeenshire Council and promotion through the Getabout brand promotes the benefits of and encourages increased levels of active and sustainable travel. As part of wider initiatives to encourage more active lifestyles, this work helps to reduce levels of obesity and related illnesses later in life. It also works to encourage mode shift away from single occupancy car use, therefore helping to reduce emissions from transport which also impact upon health. Projects include Peterhead cycle demonstration town improvements and core path improvements on the Formartine and Buchan Way. Getabout events have also been held in various towns and schools across Aberdeenshire over the last year five years. PREVENTION – How is the partnership shifting towards preventative planning? Are resources being shifted? Many of the actions being taken forward through the Nestrans Regional Transport Strategy and Aberdeenshire’s Local Transport Strategy are focussed on prevention. Transport is an enabler rather than an end in itself and therefore actions to improve the transport infrastructure contribute to prevention in other areas. Actions that are currently being taken forward with a particular focus on prevention include: Nestrans LEAD PARTNERSHIP: Transport SOA PRIORITY: Item: 5 Page: 2 Nestrans are currently developing a regional Active Travel Action Plan. This is currently out for consultation and sets the long term vision for the development of a strategic active travel network across the north east as well as supporting policies for the development of cycling and walking. The Nestrans Health and Transport Action Plan has also been re-freshed and re-published in July 2014. This sets the framework for actions to improve the links between transport and public health and social care and improve access to healthcare facilities. Transportation and Health Information Centre (THInC) – the THInC helpline officially opened on 31st January 2013 and continues to provide assistance on transport options to health appointments across Grampian and Moray. The hub continues to be promoted on all NHS appointment letters with the primary aim of improving access to health services and preventing missed appointments as a result of transport difficulties. Health and Transport A Health and Transport Action Plan Co-ordinator post is jointly funded by Nestrans and NHS Grampian with the objective of taking forward and delivering the regional Health and Transport Action Plan. This action plan is split into two key strands; transport and public health (e.g. pollution from road traffic); and access to health and social care. The Transport to Health Information Hub falls within the access to health and social care strand and is jointly funded by Nestrans, NHS Grampian, Scottish Ambulance Service, Aberdeen City, Aberdeenshire and Moray Councils and Hitrans. Getabout The Getabout partnership is a partnership of Nestrans, Aberdeen City Council, Aberdeenshire Council, Aberdeen University, RGU, Aberdeen College, NHS Grampian and the Energy Savings Trust. Getabout is funded by Nestrans and supported by all partners to deliver sustainable transport improvements and promote the benefits of cycling and walking with the aim of encouraging mode shift reducing congestion, improving air quality and increasing levels of physical activity. Regional Transport Strategy Nestrans continues to work in partnership with both Aberdeen City and Aberdeenshire Councils and wider partners to deliver the Regional Transport Strategy and sets its budgets in discussion with the two councils. RESOURCES – To what extent is the partnership and its members jointly resourcing the shared outcomes? Item: 5 Page: 3 Peterhead Cycle demonstration town which aims to increase the number of cycle trips in the area for both recreational and utility purposes helping to stimulate interest in Peterhead as a cycle friendly area. It is intended that the outcome of these efforts will improve the health of the local population by increasing physical activity and create an area where cycling is normalised. The initiative aims to ensure the completion of dedicated cycle links between the wider residential areas, the town centre and other key destinations. It involves both infrastructure improvements to enhance the cycle network and also marketing and promotion initiatives. ARI Bus Leaflet – In October 2014 Nestrans, in conjunction with NHS Grampian re-launched its ‘Access to Foresterhill Health Campus by Bus’ leaflet. The purpose of this leaflet is to highlight how well the hospital is served by bus and encourage staff, patients and visitors to the hospital to travel by bus and help to ease congestion at the site. The leaflet has been distributed to a wide range of locations across the north east, including GPs surgeries, healthcare facilities and local Council offices. PLACE – To what extent is the partnership focussing on place? The RTS supports the delivery of the Strategic Development Plan which sets the spatial strategy for development across the North East to 2035. The RTS works to increase rail and bus patronage and increase levels of cycling and walking to reduce congestion and improve the attractiveness of towns and villages across the region. Projects that are specifically focussed on place include: Aberdeen City and Shire Joint Bus Stop Information Initiative – Aberdeenshire Council, with funding from Nestrans and in association with Aberdeen City Council, manage the production and posting of at-stop bus timetable information across both Aberdeenshire and Aberdeen City as well as the upgrade of at-stop infrastructure to facilitate this. In 2013/14 this programme of improvements has continued with the replacement or provision of bus timetable display cases and ensuring standardised region wide DDA compliant timetable information is displayed. Cycling Development Officer – In October 2014 Nestrans appointed a Cycling Development Officer. This post is funded by Nestrans with support from Sustrans, the sustainable transport charity. The role of the Cycling Development Officer is to work with both Aberdeen City and Aberdeenshire Councils as well as cycling organisations to develop cycling initiatives across the north east. Sustainable Travel Grant Scheme – Nestrans continues to operate its sustainable travel grant scheme which provides up to £10,000 match funding to support sustainable transport initiatives and is available to any organisation based in Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire. Item: 5 Page: 4 PERFORMANCE – How is the partnership performing in delivering the outcomes set out in the Single Outcome Agreement? The most recent data available for the SOA monitoring indicators is provided below. Much of the information is sourced from the Scottish Household Survey which is carried out every two years and as a result, it can take time to receive updates to data. Laurencekirk junction – Nestrans has commissioned consultants to undertake a study and prepare a robust evidence case for any proposed scheme to improve access to / from the A90 trunk road in the vicinity of Laurencekirk. The study is being undertaken in partnership with Transport Scotland, Aberdeenshire and Angus Councils and Tactran (the Regional Transport Partnership for Tayside and Central region). Part funding of £100,000 for the study has been committed by Transport Scotland. Public transport provision – Aberdeenshire Council continues to run six local bus area forums to engage with local communities on bus issues. The Council has recently updated its passenger transport strategy, including its public transport policy statement which sets out its objectives for passenger transport services in the area. Aberdeenshire Council spends approximately £18.5 million per year on the contracted provision of supported passenger services, school transport services and social work transport services with some 800+ contracts in place at any one time with a variety of operators delivering these contracts using a range of taxis, minibuses, buses and coaches. Many of the contracts for supported passenger services cover the more rural areas and times of the day when services are not commercially viable (e.g. evenings and weekends). The Council also continues to provide and maintain passenger transport facilities and information systems, support concessionary travel schemes and administer ticketing initiatives. Work is currently underway to expand real time information provision into Aberdeenshire which will have significant benefits across the region in terms of providing passengers with the information on when their bus is expected at their stop. Many of the Getabout events that are held are designed to support wider local events, for example the Aden Bike Challenge, Portsoy Boat Festival or Bike Week within schools and are therefore very much focussed on engaging with local communities. Integrated Travel Towns – Aberdeenshire Council have identified the Towns of Peterhead, Huntly, Portlethen, Fraserburgh, Inverurie and Ellon as Integrated Travel Towns and aim to develop these as hubs for walking, cycling and public transport. Funding for cycling improvements in these towns has been awarded through the Sustrans Community Links project and will be delivered between 2014-16. Item: 5 Page: 5 The number of passengers per year through Aberdeenshire rail stations has increased by 40% at Stonehaven, 254% at Inverurie, 35% at Huntly, 72% at Insch and 161% at Portlethen between 2004/05 and 2012/13 and by 64% at Laurencekirk between 2009/10 and 2012/13. The average growth across Scotland over the same time period is 47%. Aberdeenshire has the highest rate of car ownership in Scotland with around 84% of households having access to at least one vehicle. Road traffic levels in Aberdeenshire have increased by 9% since 2000 and although saw a slight decrease after 2006 during Nestrans also produces an annual monitoring report which monitors 51 transport indicators. The bullet points below highlight some of the trends that are relevant to the SOA outcomes for Aberdeenshire. Performance Target 2006/07 2008/09 2010/11 2011/12 2013/14 2015/16 2022/23 Medium term outcome: Improved transport infrastructure EC10 % of people who find local services fairly or very 85% 81% 84% convenient – doctors surgery (Scottish Data (2007/08) (2009/10) (2011/12) Household Survey) expected November EC11 % of people who find local services fairly or very 55% 58% 64% 2014 convenient – hospital outpatient (Scottish (2007/08) (2009/10) (2011/12) Household Survey) EC12 % of people who find local services fairly or very 70% 73% 79% 80% convenient – public transport (Scottish 80% (2007/08) (2009/10) 2012 (target) Household Survey) EC13 % of driver journeys delayed due to congestion 13% 12% 13% 13% 10% (Scottish Household Survey) (2007/08) (2009/10) (2011/12) (2011/12) Medium term outcome: Options have been developed to expand the DRT and supported bus network across Aberdeenshire to support employment and training opportunities EC14 % of bus users very or fairly satisfied with the 90% 89% 90% or quality of public transport (North East Bus 92% (2012) (2013) above Satisfaction Survey) Medium term outcome: Condition of the local and strategic road network within Aberdeenshire has been improved by the deployment of Asset Management techniques Short term outcome: Condition of the local and strategic road network within Aberdeenshire has not worsened as compared to 2011 EC15 % of road network that should be considered for 26.7% 24.7% 24.3% 26% 27% maintenance treatment (Aberdeenshire Council) (2009/2011) (2010/12) (2011/13) (2012/13) Item: 5 Page: 6 The proportion of children walking to school has remained relatively static at around 42% between 2008 and 2013 whilst the proportion of children cycling has increased from 3.1% in 2008 to 3.9% in 2013 (the national average is 44% for walking and 3.5% for cycling). Mode split travel to work – In 2012, around 79% of people in Aberdeenshire were travelling to work by car either as a car driver or passenger with 10% walking, 1% cycling and 4% using public transport. Although there is evidence that the number of people cycling is increasing, the proportions themselves have only fluctuated marginally since 2005/06. the recession, has stabilised at 2.7 million vehicle kilometres in 2012. Item: 5 Page: 7 A90 at Laurencekirk – Nestrans has appointed consultants to examine the options for improving access to Laurencekirk and develop a robust evidence case for a preferred solution. This work is ongoing. Strategic and local road safety improvements on the key routes across Aberdeenshire – the A947 route action work is continuing with Nestrans having funded phase 2 of the bend improvement strategy and contributions towards localised surfacing works, improved drainage and road markings. Road safety remains a key priority of the RTS which was refreshed in 2013 and of Aberdeenshire Council’s Local Transport Strategy. PERFORMANCE – How is the partnership performing in delivering the action plan set out in the Single Outcome Agreement? Support in the provision of replacement minibuses for operation of some A2B dial -a-bus services – Nestrans provided funding for the purchase of a replacement minibus for the A2B service in Alford, Strathdon and Westhill in 2013/14. Item: 5 Page: 8 Work in partnership with the Scottish Government on the dualling of the A96 and lobby for the upgrade of the A90 to Fraserburgh – Transport Scotland has committed to dualling the A96 by 2030 and work to date has included traffic surveys and economic appraisals with a contract now awarded for Strategic Environmental Assessment. The contract for detailed design of the first section (Inverness to Nairn) has also now been issued with details of a preferred option expected to be announced in October 2014. The Energetica Corridor Multi-Modal Study (Fraserburgh and Peterhead to Aberdeen) is currently being commissioned by Nestrans to look at the options for improving transport links on this corridor. This is a multi-modal study that will look at all options, including Deliver Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route and dualling of A90 Balmedie-Tipperty – procurement processes are now underway with a preferred contractor now selected and completion planned for spring 2018. Continued promotion and running of activities under the Getabout brand involving communities, business and schools in promoting the benefits of sustainable travel – Getabout runs an annual programme of events and in 2014 events in Aberdeenshire included Run Balmoral, Walk to Work week, Alford Green Energy Event, events at schools during Bike Week (June), Whitehills Festival in Breamar, Peterhead Harbours Open Day, Ride the North, European Mobility Week and Portsoy Boat Festival. All events promoted and provided advice on the benefits of active and sustainable travel and were aimed at improving safety and increasing awareness of alternatives to the car. Strategic cycle link improvements in Peterhead, Ellon, Westhill and A96 Aberdeen to Blackburn as well as specific interventions associated with AWPR commitments to non-motorised modes. – Cycle link improvements are being delivered in Peterhead as part of Aberdeenshire Council's Cycle Demonstration Town initiative (see above). Nestrans is currently consulting on a Draft Active Travel Action Plan which aims to set the long term vision and framework for the development of a strategic active travel network across the north east. Aberdeenshire Council were also successful in obtaining £270,000 of funding from Sustrans from their Community Links programme, over the next two years. Projects to be delivered with this funding include cycling improvements in the Integrated Travel Towns of Portlethen, Huntly, Inverurie, Frasrerburgh, Peterhead and Ellon. Resurfacing / reconstruction on local and strategic routes and bridges across Aberdeenshire as per the annual road maintenance programme – ongoing programme of maintenance managed and delivered by Aberdeenshire Council with some funding contributions from Nestrans. Item: 5 Page: 9 Progress work to reopen Kintore rail station and consider options for re-opening of the lines to Banchory and Ellon / Peterhead / Fraserburgh – Estimated delivery of Kintore station is 2014-19 and awaiting publication of the Aberdeen to Inverness GRIP3 rail study which will provide a more definitive timescale (this five year timescale reflects Network Rail’s five year funding periods). The Nestrans Regional Transport Strategy was refreshed in 2013 and contains a new action to ‘investigate, in line with the principles of STAG, the feasibility, costs and benefits of new railway lines to expand railway provision in the north east’. In partnership with Transport Scotland, Aberdeenshire Council and Aberdeen City Council, Nestrans is currently in the process of commissioning a multi-modal study of this corridor between Fraserburgh and Peterhead to Aberdeen which will look at all options to improve transport links on this corridor including re-opening the rail line. Consultants are expected to be appointed in October and the initial phase of the study should take approximately one year to complete. The appraisal process will include consultation with key stakeholders and public events and will consider options across all modes of transport to identify interventions which may merit further, more detailed study. the road and options for re-opening the rail line (see below). Item: 5 Page: 10 Item: 6 Page: 1 ABERDEENSHIRE COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD – 26 NOVEMBER 2014 SOA FOCUS: SAFER COMMUNITIES AND REDUCING REOFFENDING 1 Recommendations: 1.1 Discuss the progress made by the Aberdeenshire Community Safety Partnership and Northern Community Justice Authority in delivering the outcomes set out in the Single Outcome Agreement. 1.2 Support activity by demonstrating how each partner is contributing towards the “Aberdeenshire is the safest place in Scotland” long-term outcome. 1.3 Challenge performance as part of the partnership’s governance role to be satisfied that we are collectively doing as much as we can to improve outcomes, plan preventatively and join up resources. 2 Background / Discussion 2.1 During the previous year the Community Planning Partnership Executive and Board has dedicated time on its agenda to scrutinising the priorities set in the Single Outcome Agreement. At its last meeting the Board agreed a forward programme of “support and challenge” of its priorities stretching through to summer 2015. 2.2 The template in appendix 1 has been completed by members of the Aberdeenshire Community Safety Partnership and Northern Community Justice Authority and is framed around the themes of prevention, resources, place and performance. 2.3 Board members are asked to show how their organisation is contributing towards the priority “safer communities and reducing reoffending” as well as the specific themes highlighted in the template. 2.4 In light of Community Planning Partnerships being held responsible for improving outcomes for each of their priority areas, Board members are encouraged to challenge progress to date. 3 Equalities, Staffing and Financial Implications 3.1 The recent agreement on joint resourcing and community planning partnerships published as part of the Scottish budget for 2014/15 places further emphasis on partners demonstrating how they can pool their shared resources – budgets, staff, buildings, information – to deliver improvements for their shared priorities. 3.2 This report does not require an equalities impact assessment because its recommendations do not have a differential impact on people with protected characteristics. Cheryl Smith, Team Leader (Community Safety), Aberdeenshire Council, Peter Willox, Chief Officer, Northern Community Justice Authority and Sophie Humphries, Strategic Development Officer (Community Planning) Aberdeenshire Council 11 November 2014 Preparing, in consultation with partners, an “area plan” for reducing reoffending; Monitoring the performance of partners (Scottish Prison Service (“SPS”) and local authorities) in complying with the plan; Promoting good practice in the management of offenders; Allocating Section 27 funding (for Criminal Justice Social Work Services) to local authorities; and Producing an Annual Report on performance and activities during the year. A range of other services and agencies are becoming increasingly involved with the ‘reducing reoffending’ agenda in recognition of the fact that there may be a complex range of issues lying behind an individual’s offending behaviour, and with the aim of preventing the continuation of involvement in crime by future generations (e.g. other local authority services such as housing, Under the Act, CJAs, local authorities and SPS have a ‘duty to cooperate’ in the implementation of their roles around the management of offenders. Other key partners include Police Scotland, National Health Service, Scottish Court Service, Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, Victim Support Scotland and other 3rd Sector organisations, and CJAs link in additionally with Community Planning Partnerships (“CPPs”) and Alcohol and Drugs Partnerships (“ADPs”), chiefly around the sharing of information. The Northern CJA covers the seven local authority areas of Aberdeenshire, Aberdeen City, Moray, Highland, Orkney, Shetland and the Western Isles, the ‘Authority’ itself being seven elected Members, one from each of the local authorities. The NCJA is one of eight CJAs across Scotland created by the Management of Offenders Etc (Scotland) Act 2005 (“the Act”) with the key strategic functions of: LEAD PARTNERSHIP: Community Safety Partnership and Northern Community Justice Authority (NCJA) SOA PRIORITY: Aberdeenshire is the safest place in Scotland Item: 6 Page: 2 The NCJA and Aberdeenshire CPP have links in place for the exchange of information on a regular basis, and feed into each Aberdeenshire SOA Current (unconfirmed) timescales indicate that the national body will be put in place for 2016-17 and that CJAs will cease to exist at the end of March 2016. The NCJA meantime will be pleased to provide any support, advice and guidance as required as CPPs consider how they might take forward the reducing reoffending agenda in their respective areas. A national ‘toolkit’ for CPPs is being compiled, and the NCJA is also producing a version around local issues to complement this, as well as facilitating workshops for discussion and networking locally. Scottish Government’s response to the findings of this consultation was to propose and consult (in April 2014) upon a variation of the local option: local strategic planning and delivery of services through CPPs, and the establishment of a national body to provide independent professional assurance that community justice outcomes are being delivered. This consultation, which focussed chiefly on the form and function of the national body, closed at the start of July 2014, and Scottish Government are due to respond in early November. As a result of the above reports, in December 2012 Scottish Government embarked upon an initial consultation on the redesign of community justice services. This proposed three possible alternatives: a new single community justice service (whereby criminal justice social work services would move out of local authorities and into a single service); retaining CJAs but giving them enhanced powers for commissioning, etc; and a local model whereby CPPs take responsibility for reducing reoffending. Audit Scotland produced two reports: “An Overview of Scotland’s Criminal Justice System” (2011); and “Reducing Reoffending in Scotland” (2012). Key findings were around the complexity of the landscape, and resulting lack of clear accountability for reducing reoffending. One of the recommendations made by the Angiolini Commission on Women Offenders (2012) was for a new national service to “commission, provide and manage adult offender services in the community”. Community Justice Redesign substance misuse and mental health teams, and children and families teams, the Department of Work and Pensions/JobCentre Plus, colleges and further education providers). Item: 6 Page: 3 Community Safety Partnership: The CSP continue to embrace early intervention and prevention techniques across all priority areas however as we progress into a new fiscal year we are currently reviewing our structures and processes. A large number of initiatives we continue to run predominantly in partnership with our Police and Fire colleagues and recently we have embarked on a weekly meeting bringing together police and council with a specific focus on antisocial behaviour related to housing (both council and privately-owned) – this process ensures we embed an early intervention and preventative approach. The aim is to roll this approach out to other priority areas and in the first instance to widen this to all aspects of antisocial behaviour. A newly formed multi-agency partnership is currently being formed which will focus on all aspects of Gender-Based Abuse, again a large focus of the group will be towards early intervention and prevention for victim(s). Aberdeenshire does not receive specific Section 27 grant funding (see below) from the NCJA towards this priority area – the WSA, as the name implies, is very much a partnership arrangement. PREVENTION – How is the partnership shifting towards preventative planning? Are resources being shifted? Northern Community Justice Authority: The NCJA has a specific priority on early intervention and prevention, to “Maintain the focus of NCJA and partners on Early Intervention and Prevention, and the Whole System Approach, to support members of our communities who offend or who are at risk of offending, and to further reduce the number of young people entering the criminal justice system.” Actions under this heading are around the roll-out and delivery of the Whole System Approach (“WSA”) to reducing re/offending by young people across the NCJA. In relation to Aberdeenshire, the NCJA is on the circulation list for the WSA Operational Group, receiving meeting documentation and also ad hoc reports and updates which are circulated to members. This enables the NCJA to keep abreast of developments in the Shire. The NCJA also receives reducing reoffending data direct from Police Scotland’s Youth Justice Management Unit, which covers Aberdeenshire, Aberdeen City and Moray. other’s strategies and plans. This ensures shared aims around reducing reoffending, but NCJA plans also share the aims of the SOA across other priority areas (not just specifically ‘reducing reoffending’) including in relation to domestic abuse offenders and victims, and drugs and alcohol. Item: 6 Page: 4 PLACE – To what extent is the partnership focussing on place? Community Safety Partnership: Under the review of Community Safety is the current set-up of all working groups and partnerships. We are embarking on producing 6 area-based strategic assessments (to fall in-line with council areas) which will examine all the evidence for Community Safety issues and establish local priorities. These will then feed into Local Community Plans and Action Plans as well as be an influence towards our Community Safety Groups ensuring we are all focussing our attention and resources on the same priorities albeit from different perspectives. These 6 strategic assessments will be place-based followed by a focus on thematic areas taking cognisance of both victim(s) and offender(s) and will reflect the needs of our communities, we will then take these priorities and produce an Aberdeenshire-wide strategic assessment for Community Safety which will also focus on Reducing Reoffending. Community Safety Partnership: The CSP continues to have a dedicated budget covering the costs of both, staff posts and funded initiatives throughout the year with some monies being received for specific projects. As stated above the CSP is currently under review as is the funding of all initiatives to ensure we continue to meet our set outcomes and objectives; adhere to continuous improvement and ensure we receive and provide best value for money. All Service Level Agreements are under scrutiny as is the current Action Plan. We work closely with our main partners as well as other departments across council with the intention of pooling together joint resources and budgets to embed into next year’s Action Plan. As mentioned earlier, there may be a complex range of issues lying behind an individual’s offending behaviour, and working in partnership, with relevant partners committing resourcing as necessary/appropriate, is routine for criminal justice services/agencies. RESOURCES – To what extent is the partnership and its members jointly resourcing the shared outcomes? Northern Community Justice Authority: On an annual basis the Scottish Government allocates funding to each of the eight CJAs further to Section 27 of the Social Work (Scotland) Act 1968. The NCJA then re-allocates this to each of the seven local authorities in the area. In both cases, the allocations for core Criminal Justice Social Work services are made based on a formula comprising a number of elements: average workload for core services; % share of Sheriff’s court business; and % share of unemployed males aged 16 – 24. Additional funding is allocated for ‘non core’ projects and services. Item: 6 Page: 5 Alcohol and Drugs: SOA actions are under the priority headings of ‘Reduction in Inequalities in Health Outcomes’ and ‘Aberdeenshire is the Safest Place in Scotland’. Whilst not having specific outcomes/actions in the NCJA plans currently, substance misuse issues are addressed indirectly across pretty much all of the CJA’s priority areas (e.g. as part of Early Intervention and Prevention of young offenders, approaches to Women Offenders, Community Reintegration of prisoners, High Risk perpetrators, etc.). Other priority areas Fewer Under-21’s are reconvicted within one year: As referred to above, the NCJA has a priority area around early intervention and prevention, and the roll-out and development of the Whole System Approach. As well as receiving general updates from partners in this area, the NCJA has an overall target in terms of reducing reconviction rates for Under-21’s. Aberdeenshire Children’s Services/Whole System Approach partners maintain a performance framework which would provide more meaningful and detailed outcomes information for Aberdeenshire. Reintegration of prisoners back into the community: the Chief Officer of the NCJA chairs the HMP & YOI Grampian Community Implementation Group which has brought together senior representatives of partners involved in the development of community links with the prison, to share information, resolve issues, etc. As with any new project there have been initial ‘teething problems’, but there are also examples of really good practice, including the provision by Aberdeenshire of the library service within the prison, which works on the same basis as any other library in the community. The ‘Case Management Board’ process, which brings partners round the table to look at the needs of individual prisoners at the start and towards the end of their sentence, is also in place. Services within Aberdeenshire would have more detailed information about current progress as far as they are concerned. Common (NCJA and Aberdeenshire SOA) Reducing Reoffending priority areas PERFORMANCE – How is the partnership performing in delivering the outcomes set out in the Single Outcome Agreement? Northern Community Justice Authority: In relation to its annual Action Plan, the NCJA receives updates from partners at the six month and year end periods for onward reporting to the NCJA itself on progress in achieving outcomes and actions (as required by statute). Item: 6 Page: 6 In order to further improve performance in this area SFRS are currently working with partners to enhance referral systems and processes to target "High risk households/vulnerable persons". We're also currently off target in respect of the rate of accidental dwelling fires per 100,000 population. During the past year Fire Service personnel within Aberdeenshire and the wider LSO Area have worked hard to increase the number of Home Fire Safety Visits (HFSV) generated and delivered. As a result, HFSV increased from 283 in 2012/13 to 910 in 2013/14 - a 322% increase. We're currently exceeding the Serious Assaults target. However, a number of initiatives (e.g. Safer Streets, etc.) are in the pipeline to make sure assaults are as low as possible throughout the Shire. Other initiatives led by different partnerships will no doubt also have a bearing on this particular indicator, e.g. those dealing with alcohol misuse. It would appear that very few of the 11 indicators are hovering close to the target line - they appear to be either considerably above or below the target line. This is especially marked in respect of the road safety indicators - 2 of the 5 road safety indicators have already exceeded their annual target figure (total serious injuries and child serious injuries respectively), whereas the other 3 road safety indicators are comfortably within their respective target threshold. A concerted partnership effort to address road safety issues within the north east area is underway. Community Safety Partnership: Up to September 2014, the partnership was meeting 6 of the 11 SOA targets. The cumulative totals and cumulative targets for each indicator are presented in the graphs below. Note: The targets are the black lines in the graphs. The blue areas are the actual numbers recorded. Anything below the black line means the indicator is on target. The percentages in the tables show the extent to which we are below (or above) target. Domestic Abuse: This appears under the SOA heading of ‘Aberdeenshire is the Safest Place in Scotland’. The NCJA has a priority area around ‘High Risk Offenders including Domestic Abuse Perpetrators’, and is supporting/monitoring the roll-out of ‘Moving Forward: Making Changes’ (programme for sex offenders) across the area which is being led by the Joint Sex Offender Programme team based in Aberdeenshire. In addition, information is being collated about what is available around domestic abuse (for both perpetrators and victims) across the NCJA. There is little in the way of performance information available as yet in this field. Item: 6 Page: 7 PERFORMANCE – How is the partnership performing in delivering the action plan set out in the Single Outcome Agreement? Community Safety Partnership: As part of the review we are examining all aspects of our Action Plan including performance indicators and Service Level Agreements to ensure we continue to meet our objectives. (Please see graphs below). Far more positively, vandalism offences are at a decade low, and recent survey data suggests residents generally feel safe in their homes and in their neighbourhoods. Item: 6 Page: 8 YTD Target YTD Target +32% YTD Target 45 34 Off Target YTD YTD Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 650 600 550 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 YTD Target YTD Target -38% YTD450 Target 278 On Target YTD YTD Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec S4 - No. of people slightly injured in road collisions 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 S1 - No. of serious assaults Number of People Number of Children Number of Offences Number of People YTD Target YTD Target -18% YTD19.5 Target 16 On Target YTD YTD Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 YTD Target YTD0.97 Target YTD Target -100% On Target YTD YTD Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec S5 - No. of children killed in road collisions 30 27 24 21 18 15 12 9 6 3 0 S2 - No. of people killed in road collisions YTD Target YTD Target +67% YTD82.5 Target 139 Off Target YTD YTD Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 3 6 9 12 15 YTD Target YTD Target +132% YTD5.6 Target 13 Off Target YTD YTD Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec S6 - No. of children seriously injured in road collisions 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 S3 - No. of people seriously injured in road collisions Number of People Number of Children SOA Indicators - Cumulative Totals versus Cumulative Targets Item: 6 Page: 9 YTD Target YTD Target YTD Target YTD Target Target YTD Target +2% 93% 91% On Target YTD Target YTD Target +6% 97% 91% On Target YTD No Periodic Targets No Periodic Targets YTD38.6 Target 39.9 Off Target YTD YTD Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar S11 - Percentage of adult residents stating they feel 'very safe' or 'fairly safe' when at home alone at night 0.00 S10 - Percentage of adult residents stating they feel 'very safe' or 'fairly safe' when walking alone in the local neighbourhood after dark YTD30.2 Target 35.7 Off Target YTD YTD Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 25.00 50.00 75.00 100.00 S8 - Rate of wilful fires per 100,000 pop. +3% 0.00 25.00 50.00 75.00 Rate of Fires +18% Rate of Fires S7 - Rate of accidental dwelling fires per 100,000 pop. 2250 2000 1750 1500 1250 1000 750 500 250 0 YTD Target YTD Target -35% YTD Target 672 1038 On Target YTD YTD Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar S9 - No. of vandalism offences Item: 6 Page: 10 Number of Offences Item: 8 Page: 1 ABERDEENSHIRE COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD – 26 NOVEMBER 2014 COMMISSION ON STRENGTHENING LOCAL DEMOCRACY: FINAL REPORT 1 Recommendations The Board is recommended to: 1.1 Note the summary of the Commission’s report and agree that the recommendations specifically for Community Planning Partnerships are explored by the community planning team and any further recommendations reported to the Board in due course. 2 Background 2.1 The Commission on Strengthening Local Democracy was established in autumn 2013, and operates independently of any organisation. It brings together key figures from across civic Scotland, senior councillors, and specific experts with a common resolve to understand why local services and local accountability matter. 2.2 The Commission has based all of its work on an open conversation about Scotland’s democracy and how it might change. This involved over 200 written submissions to its call for evidence from across Scotland and Europe, telephone surveys with 1000 representative Scottish households, 13 evidence panel sessions involving 70 expert witnesses, and 5 public listening events. The Commission published its final report in August 2014 in advance of the Referendum in Scotland. 2.3 The Commission concluded that seven principles must underpin Scotland’s democratic future, as follows: Sovereignty - democratic power lies with people and communities who give some of that power to governments and local governments, not the other way round Subsidiarity - decisions should be taken as close to communities as possible, and the shape and form of local governance has to be right for the people and the places it serves Transparency - democratic governance should be clear and understandable to communities, with clean lines of accountability Participation - all communities must be able to participate in the decision making that affects their lives and their communities Spheres not tiers of governance - different spheres of democratic governance should have distinct jobs to do that are set out in ‘competencies’, rather than depend on powers being handed down from ‘higher’ levels of governance Interdependency – every sphere of governance has to support the others, and none can be or should seek to be, self-contained or selfsufficient Wellbeing – the purpose of all democratic governance is to improve all opportunities and outcomes for the individuals and communities that empower it Item: 8 Page: 2 2.4 The Commission makes the following recommendations in their final report: 2.5 Making Local Democracy Local – focuses on a review of all democratic arrangements for local democracy in Scotland based around a participative process Creating Local Tax and Spending Choices – includes recommendations that local people should decide on levels of local taxation, local government should have freedom to use property taxes as they see fit and be able to set and raise new taxes Securing Local Democracy – includes recommendations that the provisions of the European Charter of Local Self Government be adopted into law in Scotland, and a clear duty in law to support and resource community participation Making Participation Work – includes recommendations that significant reinvestment is needed in community development services, arrangements should be implemented for participatory budgeting focussing on local taxation and spend priorities, and all citizens should be able to be involved in the scrutiny and improvement of public services. The Commission makes the following recommendations specifically for Community Planning Partnerships: That every CPP in Scotland works with its communities to design and implement a clear empowerment scheme With the arrival of the Community Empowerment Bill, work will be done by partners to ensure that they are adhering to all aspects of the Bill. Aberdeenshire CPP can monitor this and propose any additional action that may be needed. All CPPs develop an approach to community scrutiny to complement their existing arrangements This again relates to the Community Empowerment Bill, specifically to the “right to participate in processes to improve outcomes of service delivery” and “strengthening community planning” elements. It also relates more generally to successful community engagement methods. Aberdeenshire CPP can propose any additional action that may be required in due course. A significant and systematic reinvestment in community learning and development in each area of Scotland Work is underway to ensure local authority community learning and development provision is aligned to the Council’s Communities & Partnerships Strategy agreed through committee, which is in turn aligned to the 2012 National Strategic Guidance for CLD. In order to deliver statutory responsibilities as set out in the 2013 legislation, work is underway to establish an Aberdeenshire Strategic Learning Partnership and 17 Local Learning Community Partnerships – an Aberdeenshire CLD Plan is required to be in place by 1st September 2015 and this will be reported to the CP Executive/Board and Council’s Education, Learning & Leisure Committee prior to submission. Item: 8 Page: 3 2.6 Other relevant work is currently ongoing by the Smith Commission which, following the referendum, has the responsibility to convene cross-party talks and facilitate an inclusive engagement process across Scotland to produce, by 30 November, recommendations for further devolution of powers to the Scottish Parliament. A consultation to allow the views of the wider public to feed into this process closed on 31st October. 3 Equalities, Staffing and Financial Implications 3.1 There are no specific proposals in this covering report, therefore an equalities impact assessment is not required. There are no financial or staffing implications as a result of this report. Erin Wood, Strategic Development Officer (Community Planning) 17 November 2014 Item: 9 Page: 1 ABERDEENSHIRE COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD – 26 NOVEMBER 2014 IMPROVEMENT PLAN MONITORING 1 Recommendations The Board is recommended to: 1.1 Monitor the Improvement Plan for 2014/15. 1.2 Agree to further extend the deadlines of the actions relating to joint resourcing in order that a recommendation can be made to the Board in the future regarding use of the information that has been collected. 2 Improvement Plan 2.1 As part of the quality assurance of Aberdeenshire’s Single Outcome Agreement 2013-2023 with the Scottish Government, an improvement plan was agreed. This included key areas of development for the agreement and built in the results of the partnership’s self-evaluation during 2013. 2.2 On 29 January 2014 the partnership held a workshop to consider the Agreement on Joint Working on Community Planning and Resourcing. As a result, the partnership’s Improvement Plan was refreshed and agreed by the Board at its meeting on 26 March 2014. 2.3 Work has been progressing on three actions under the “Joint Resourcing” section of the action plan (shown in the appendix), as follows: Source information on partners’ financial timetables and consider future alignment of these Financial timetables have been sourced from Aberdeenshire Council, Police Scotland and NHS Grampian Cross reference all partner budgets to the SOA Information has been sourced from budget statements available online (for 2014/15 in most cases) or from partner representatives and has been mapped to our SOA priorities as far as possible. Establish a register of all joint assets and all joint staff posts The Council’s Principal Asset Management Officer has agreed to provide details of known joint assets as soon as possible. Once collection of the information had been completed, recommendations can be put to Board members on how to make best use of that information in progressing joint resourcing. 3 Equalities, Financial and Staffing Implications 3.1 There are a range of actions relating to the further development of joint resourcing in Aberdeenshire. 3.2 There is no requirement for an equalities impact assessment as the recommendations in this report do not have a differential impact on people Item: 9 Page: 2 with protected characteristics. An equalities impact assessment will be considered separately for each action in the Improvement Plan. Erin Wood, Strategic Development Officer (Community Planning) November 2014 Prevention / Joint Resourcing Session Prevention / Joint Resourcing Session Ensure all statutory partners and Third Sector Interface table business plans at Board and evidence alignment to SOA Prevention / Joint Resourcing Session Prevention / Joint Resourcing Session Prevention / Joint Resourcing Session Review SOA priority setting process in line with national best practice Agree to monitor a selection of preventative activities, using an agreed method, in order to evidence the results of the prevention approach Priorities Ask partners / partnerships to focus available funding on preventative activities Consider establishment of a community planning / prevention Change Fund Board Corporate Policy Officer Board Board Board April 2015 November 2014 April 2015 April 2015 April 2015 ACTION SOURCE LEAD TIMESCALE Prevention – the CPP will develop a detailed plan for prevention across each of its priorities where all partners are clear on their role and the actions expected of them. Build prevention in as a theme or principle into any Total Prevention / Board September 2014 Place initiative that is undertaken by the CPP. Joint Resourcing Session IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2014/15 ABERDEENSHIRE COMMUNITY PLANNING PARTNERSHIP Partnership Analyst attending national training courses on priority setting and strategic assessments. Awaiting steer from SG. Progress Paper tabled at September Board. Further update at Nov Board. Work is ongoing. UPDATE APPENDIX Item: 9 Page: 3 Partners reaffirm their commitment to sharing data at a local level Partners consider to adopt the Council’s current policy of offering partners the first option on vacant properties Review the joint asset and staff register Establish a register of all joint assets and joint staff posts Source information on partners’ financial timetables and consider future alignment of these Cross-reference all partner budget to SOA Joint Resourcing Partners agree location of place-based initiative Detailed proposals are brought forward for agreement by the CPP ACTION Rural Partnerships and Cairngorms Park Authority table business plans at relevant Local Community Planning Group to evidence alignment to Local Community Plans Place Prevention / Joint Resourcing Session Prevention / Joint Resourcing Session Prevention / Joint Resourcing Session Prevention / Joint Resourcing Session Prevention / Joint Resourcing Session Prevention / Joint Resourcing Session SOURCE Prevention / Joint Resourcing Session Board North East Joint Public Sector Group Corporate Policy Officer Corporate Policy Officer Corporate Policy Officer Corporate Policy Officer CPP Board CPP Board LEAD Rural Partnerships and Cairngorms National Park Authority April 2015 To be confirmed September 2016 November 2014 November 2014 November 2014 March 2014 June 2014 TIMESCALE April 2015 Meetings held with range of partners to identify what can be shared Desktop work progressed Desktop work progressed Desktop work progressed Board agreed location Focus of project agreed in June, progress report tabled at Board in September UPDATE Item: 9 Page: 4 Item: 10 Page: 1 ABERDEENSHIRE COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD – 26 NOVEMBER 2014 COMMUNITY PLANNING PARTNERSHIP BUDGETS 2015/16 1 Recommendations The Board is recommended to: 1.1 Provisionally agree the budget contributions for the 2015/16 community planning budget as detailed in paragraph 2.2. 1.2 Agree provisional budget allocations for the 2015/16 community planning budget as detailed in paragraph 2.3. 1.3 Agree in principle that the unallocated funding in 2015/16 could be used towards temporary staffing costs as detailed in paragraph 2.5. 2 Background / Discussion 2.1 In 2014/15, the Community Planning Partnership had a budget of £93,000 comprising partner contributions. Financial contributions for future years have not been agreed due to changing circumstances of partners. 2.2 It is proposed that the budget for 2015/16 provisionally maintains a similar level of partner contributions as follows: Aberdeenshire Council £44,240 Scottish Fire and Rescue Service £12,190 Police Scotland £12,190 Nestrans £12,190 NHS Grampian £12,190 Total £93,000 2.3 It is proposed that in 2015/16, the following budget allocations will be required by the partnership, as shown in the table below: BUDGET HEADING Staffing (including oncosts) Citizens’ Panel SUB-HEADING ALLOCATION PT Community Planning Support Officer (3 days) and FT Partnership Analyst Panel management (incl 4 surveys) £50,000 £25,000 Viewpoint feedback newsletter costs £4,000 Communications SOA Annual Report Summary Our Aberdeenshire Newsletter Web Hosting and Maintenance Administration Admin, travel, catering Unallocated Unallocated £400 £400 £700 £2,000 £10,500 2014/15 Total £93,000 Item: 10 Page: 2 2.4 It is planned that the Citizens’ Panel will begin a new four-year contract with a research consultant in April 2015. The “Invitation to Tender” document should be published by end 2014. Focus groups will no longer be included as a requirement in order to keep costs as low as possible, however, they would be available as an “optional extra” if required. 2.5 The CPP have funded a temporary part-time Communications Intern post from September 2014 – March 2015. In order to give a more substantial time period for this post to achieve increased promotion and awareness of community planning activity and to help to put processes in place around communication for the longer term, it is suggested that the unallocated funding in 2015/16 could be used for an extension of the Intern post. The Board are asked to agree this in principle to allow the community planning team to explore further. 2.6 Local Community Planning Funding The Council contributes the funding allocated to Local Community Planning Groups (LCPG) and funds the equivalent of a full-time Community Planning Officer post in each area. In 2014/15, the funding available to LCPGs is £80,000 and the current breakdown of LCPG allocations is as follows: Banff & Buchan LCPG - £10,103 Buchan LCPG - £10,103 Formartine LCPG - £10,103 Garioch LCPG - £10,103 Kincardine & Mearns LCPG - £10,103 Marr LCPG - £10,103 Balance (towards staffing costs, often through Local Rural Partnership support) - £19,382 A separate budget funds the Community Planning Officer posts. 3 Equalities, Staffing and Financial Implications 3.1 The financial implications are detailed in the report. Two permanent staff posts are currently funded by the community planning budget as detailed in paragraph 2.3 Erin Wood, Strategic Development Officer (Community Planning) November 2014 Item: 12 Page: 1 ABERDEENSHIRE COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD – 26 NOVEMBER 2014 FINANCIAL MONITORING REPORT 2014/15 1 Recommendations The Board is recommended to: 1.1 Note the budget monitoring report for 2014/15 as at end of October 2014 for the Community Planning budget, Local Community Planning budgets and Fairer Scotland Funding. 2 Background / Discussion 2.1 The Executive has delegated authority to make decisions on funding up to a value of £10,000. 2.2 Key elements to highlight are as follows: Community Planning budget (partnership funded – as seen at appendix 1) The large unallocated sum is due to a carry over of £22,289 from 2013/14 and approximately £6,000 that remained unallocated for 2014/15. Some of this has now been allocated, leaving £19,004 still to be committed as at end October As agreed in 2013/14, a temporary part-time Communications Intern will be funded, until 31 March 2015 in the first instance, to support work around CPP communications and marketing. This need was highlighted in order to complete actions within the CPP’s Improvement Plan. Laura Bell Williams took up post in mid-October The Our Aberdeenshire website has recently been upgraded at low cost. However, in the future, an alternative platform other than Joomla may be investigated to ensure the sustainability of the website Local Community Planning Group budgets (Council funded – as seen at appendix 2) Formartine – the LCPG have allocated funds to the production of dog fouling signs for community councils, a feasibility study for improvements to Dr Spence Hall in Udny Green, start-up costs for Ellon Food Bank, to the CVSA Funders Fair, and to the Fit Like Ellon community groups awareness event. The group are also working with Belhevie to form a community trust Garioch –the LCPG have committed funding to Police Scotland for speed monitoring equipment, to Inverurie Men's Shed, to the Community Kitchen, to the CVSA Funders Fair, and to a community growing space working with Alzheimers Scotland. Funding for the Kinellar Youth Shelter was carried over from last year. The group also plan to begin community engagement in Westhill and Blackburn Kincardine and Mearns – the LCPG have so far allocated funds to the K&M Communities blog editorial team development, the K&M Timebanking project and to Survey Monkey costs Verbal update from other groups may be able to be given at the Board meeting Item: 12 Page: 2 Tackling Poverty & Inequalities budget (Fairer Scotland funding from the Council – as seen at appendix 3) Very high level information has been provided by the accountant. More detailed information will be provided in due course by the TP&I Strategy Group and can be reported to the Board. 3 Equalities, Staffing and Financial Implications 3.1 The staffing and financial implications from this report are laid out above. 3.2 There are no equalities implications as this report is for noting. Erin Wood, SDO (Community Planning) November 2014 Total Administration Unallocated (includes carry over from 13/14) Communications Citizens’ Panel BUDGET HEADING Staffing Web Hosting and Maintenance Website Joomla Upgrade Admin, travel, catering Annual Report Summary Our Aberdeenshire Newsletter £0 £7,000 £115,289 £43,924 £858 £0 £358 £400 £2,000 £19,004 £700 £0 £310 £700 £0 £400 £11,775 £1,785 £0 £28,448 £54,150 Staffing (CP Support Officer & CP Partnership Analyst) Communications Intern post Panel Management Newsletters Possible Focus Groups £25,000 £4,000 £2,325 ALLOCATION SPEND SUB-HEADING Community Planning 2014/15 Budget – as at 31 October 2014 All SOA outcomes Successful, inclusive, resilient communities with the confidence, capability and capacity to tackle the things that matter to them All SOA outcomes Successful, inclusive, resilient communities with the confidence, capability and capacity to tackle the things that matter to them All SOA outcomes Successful, inclusive, resilient communities with the confidence, capability and capacity to tackle the things that matter to them All SOA outcomes All SOA outcomes All SOA outcomes RELEVANT OUTCOME IN SOA 13-23 Appendix 1 Item: 12 Page: 3 Item: 12 Page: 4 Appendix 2 Local Community Planning Group Budgets 2014/15 – as at 31 Oct 2014 LOCAL CP GROUP Banff & Buchan Buchan Formartine Garioch BUDGET 14/15 £10,103 £10,103 £10,103 £10,103 Kincardine & Mearns £10,891 (incl Marr £10,103 repayment of unused community project funds) CATEGORY Printing & Stationery Hospitality Community Projects Unallocated Printing & Stationery Hospitality Community Projects Unallocated Purchase of Equipment Printing & Stationery Misc Expenses Community Projects Unallocated Printing & Stationery Hospitality Misc Expenses Community Projects Unallocated Admin Hospitality Community Projects Unallocated Printing & Stationery Misc Expenses Community Projects Unallocated ALLOCATION ACTUAL SPEND 14/15 £265 £375 £0 £9,463 £0 £67 £55 £140 £9,841 £0 £272 £1,000 £1,239 £7,884 £54 £496 £654 £477 £127 £517 £6,050 £2,932 £450 £2,464 £7,977 £50 £329 -£788 £0 £78 £66 £7,900 £2,059 £16 £139 £207,921 £2,680 £253,657 Printing and Stationery Hospitality Grants / Payments to Payment to Contractors Total £436,000 £1,200 Travel SPEND £41,513 £188 ALLOCATION IT Hardware BUDGET HEADING Staffing As at end October 2014 Fairer Scotland Funding – Tackling Poverty & Inequalities Appendix 3 Item: 12 Page: 5 Item: 13 Page: 1 ABERDEENSHIRE COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD – 26 NOVEMBER 2014 CPP BENCHMARKING FRAMEWORK 1. Recommendations The Board is recommended to: 1.1 Note the development of a new CPP Benchmarking Framework by the Improvement Service, further recommendations will be reported to the Board in due course. 2. Background 2.1 A CPP Benchmarking Framework is proposed by the Improvement Service to improve performance management and outcomes for CPPS. The first data is expected to be published in March 2015. Benchmarking is an improvement process that helps organisations to understand how they perform in comparison to other relevant organisations. It is anticipated that benchmarking will provide CPP Boards with consistent data, to allow better understanding of their own performance, identify why comparable CPPs are performing better and facilitate shared learning to deliver better outcomes. 2.2 The proposed CPP Benchmarking Framework contains two or three high level outcome measures for each of the national priorities, selected from the Menu of Local Outcome Indicators. The aim of this high level set of core indicators is to focus questions for CPP Boards and guide further exploration. These core/high level outcome measures will be supported by supplementary indicators to allow for deeper exploration and better understanding of why areas differ. The proposed indicators in the current draft Framework are nearly all included in the Aberdeenshire SOA. The current Draft CPP Benchmarking Indicator Framework is included in Appendix 1 of this report. 2.3 It is not yet clear whether CPPs will be expected to update single outcome agreements to include all the indicators in the proposed framework or whether benchmarking should be considered independent of the SOA. 2.4 A series of consultation events are taking place in mid-November between the Improvement Service and CPPs. Aberdeenshire CPP will be represented at these events to further our understanding of the potential implications of this framework for Aberdeenshire. 2.5 Aberdeenshire Council’s performance management team have offered to support the CPP in introducing the Benchmarking Framework to the CPP Board and Executive by discussing their experience of the Local Government Benchmarking Framework. 3. Equalities, Financial and Staffing Implications 3.1 There are no direct implications arising from this report. Francesca Ainsworth, Partnership Analyst and Sophie Humphries, Strategic Development Officer (Community Planning), 06 November 2014. Median earnings (£s) for residents living in the local authority area who are employed Percentage of the population (aged 16 to 64 years) in receipt of out of work benefits 2 3 Percentage of school leavers in positive and sustained destinations 5 Percentage of Children in Poverty Percentage of babies with a healthy birth weight Percentage of new born children exclusively breastfed at 6-8 weeks 12 11 10 9 Rate of recorded crimes and offences per 10,000 population Percentage of adults feel very/fairly safe when home alone at night & when walking alone in neighbourhood after dark Number of persons killed or seriously injured in road accidents Total fires per 100,000 population Safer and stronger communities 8 6 7 Early years Business (3 year) Survival Rate 4 Economic recovery and growth Employment Rate 1 Employment CORE INDICATORS Breakdown by sub-area/accidental/deliberate Breakdown by sub-area/age/road type Breakdown by sub-area/age/gender/SIMD Breakdown by Category of Crime & reconviction rate Dental health of primary 1 and primary 7 children (three category classification) Breakdown by sub-area/age group/SIMD Estimated percentage of children with a healthy weight in primary 1 Business Start-ups/Entrepreneurialism VAT/PAYE registered businesses per 10,000 adults attainment rates at S4 & S6, and % population with low/no qualifications - breakdown by subarea/age/gender/SIMD Breakdown by sub area/age/gender/SIMD/sector Unpaid (voluntary) work rate Underemployment Breakdown by sub-area/age/gender/SIMD/sector Median earnings (£s) for workforce based in the local authority area Breakdown by sub-area/type/duration/on & off flow/age group Youth claimant count Working Tax Credits Examples of SUPPLEMENTARY DATA Physical environment Social Cohesion - civic participation/community engagement/social capital Measure for "looked after" children/children 'at risk' Wellbeing measure for school age children/mental health measure Measure re Transition from primary to secondary education, e.g. attendance rates, physical activity % children meeting developmental milestones at 27-30 month review and at starting primary school (EYC) Public Sector Employment Footprint Unemployed people assisted into work from Council operated/funded employability programmes AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT DRAFT CPP BENCHMARKING INDICATOR FRAMEWORK APPENDIX 1 Item: 13 Page: 2 Average score on the short version of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS) Pregnancies among under 16 year olds (3 year average per 1000 relevant population) 14 Percentage of adults needing care receiving personal care at home or direct payments for personal care Emergency Hospital Admission Rate per 100,000 (ages 65 plus) Percentage of journeys to work made by public or active transport 19 20 Absence Rate Corporate/Health of CP partnership Proportion of Household Waste Recycled 18 Environment 17 16 Older persons Kilograms of household waste collected per capita & Non domestic Waste Percentage of children walking or cycling to school Breakdown by sub-area/age/gender/SIMD Admissions caused by drug and alcohol use Delayed discharge rate - bed days Percentage of time in the last 6 months of life spent at home or in a community setting Breakdown by sub-area/SIMD Breakdown by sub-area/gender/SIMD Cardiovascular disease mortality (<75 years) Alcohol related mortality Breakdown by sub-area/age/gender/SIMD Mortality rates per 100,000 for people aged under 75 in Scotland 13 15 Examples of SUPPLEMENTARY DATA CORE INDICATORS Health inequalities Leadership Joint Resourcing Governance SNH Apex indicator re Environment (in development for NPF) Older person's unpaid/voluntary work Financial Inclusion Use of public transport by over 65s Engaged/active older people Measure of physical activity GP attendances - by sub-area/age/gender/SIMD AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT Item: 13 Page: 3 Item: 14 Page: 1 ABERDEENSHIRE COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD – 26 NOVEMBER 2014 LOCAL STRATEGIC ASSESSMENTS 2015 1 Recommendations The Board is recommended to: 1.1 Note that the Partnership Analyst will prepare six local strategic assessments for the review of the Local Community Plans for 2016. 1.2 Agree to facilitate the Partnership Analyst in data collection and information gathering to inform the strategic assessments by making local level data available where possible. 2 Background 2.1 Six local strategic assessments were produced by the Partnership Analyst in 2013. These informed the development of the 2013-16 Local Community Plans. 2.2 The Board previously agreed that the Local Community Plans would be fully updated at the end of the three year cycle. As such, new local strategic assessments are planned to inform a full update for the 2016-19 Local Community Plans. See Appendix 1 for draft terms of reference for the strategic assessments. 2.3 The Partnership Analyst has begun data collection from open sources and is attending each of the Local Community Planning Groups over the coming weeks to raise awareness, make contacts and gain buy in for the strategic assessments at a local level. 2.4 Each Community Planning Group will be completing a horizon scanning exercise (using the PESTELO format) and information/data request templates will be sent out to a wide range of partners and contacts to gather data. 2.5 Community Planning Groups will facilitate community engagement to identify the concerns and priorities for communities themselves. This will be used to complement the data in the strategic assessments. 3 Equalities, Financial and Staffing Implications 3.1 Where data is available, the strategic assessments will consider the impact of emerging trends/issues on protected characteristics. 3.2 There are no staffing or financial implications. Francesca Ainsworth, Partnership Analyst 12th November 2014 Item: 14 Page: 2 Local Strategic Assessments & Local Community Plans 2016/19 Terms of Reference Item: 14 Page: 3 Background The current Aberdeenshire Local Strategic Assessments were produced by the Partnership Analyst at the start of 2013. These assessments were used to develop the 2013-16 Local Community Plans and continue to be used by Local Community Planning Groups (LCPG), partner organisations and community groups as reference documents. The Community Planning Partnership Board agreed that the three-year Local Community Plans would be fully updated at the end of the three year cycle. As such, new Local Strategic Assessments are proposed to direct a full update of the Local Community Plans for 2016-19. The following timetable is proposed: Key Dates Activities October 2014 – May 2015 Data collection and development of local strategic assessments April – Sep 2015 Community engagement to discuss evidence base and Draft Local Community Plan Sep 2015 March 2016 Responsibility Partnership Analyst LCPG (horizon scanning) Local Community Planning Officer/Group Risk Assessment and Priority Setting Drafted Local Community Plan proof read and circulated to Area Committee Community engagement to discuss drafted Local Community Plan Area Committee LCPO LCPG Formal risk assessment meeting with the Local Community Planning Group Feb – March 2016 March – April 2016 April 2016 Quality assurance period / proof reading, with subsequent identified amendments made. Adoption by Local Community Planning Group Local Community Planning Officers/Group Local Community Plan forwarded to Executive and Board for endorsement CPP Executive/Board Local Community Plan Published. Formal presentation to key stakeholders and those responsible for delivery of the plan CPP Team/LCPG Item: 14 Page: 4 2016 Strategic Assessment The current strategic assessments are made up of a number of sections: introduction, strategic background, methodology brief description of the area SIMD profile of the area current Aberdeenshire and area priorities (SOA and Local Plan) horizon Scanning (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legislative, Organisational current picture, trends and recommendations across each priority relevant issues, trends and recommendations outside current priorities It is proposed that the new strategic assessments follow the same structure with the addition of ward level analyses, where possible, to allow LCPGs to put an emphasis on need based on place. Community Engagement As per the planning cycle, LCPGs will conduct community engagement around the strategic assessments to determine whether the issues raised reflect communities’ own concerns and priorities. It is recommended that the feedback from these engagement sessions is used to complement the strategic assessment when setting the priorities for the Local Plans and is appended to the strategic assessment. Item: 15 Page: 1 ABERDEENSHIRE COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD – 26 NOVEMBER 2014 WHAT WORKS SCOTLAND: UPDATE 1 Recommendations The Board is recommended to: 1.1 Note the progress towards implementing the What Works Scotland project by the Community Planning team. 1.2 Discusses the update and agrees to receive future updates on the implementation of the What Works Scotland project. 1.3 Agree the three proposed work streams as the focus of What Works Scotland within Aberdeenshire. 2 Background 2.1 What Works Scotland is a new initiative to improve the way local areas in Scotland use evidence to make decisions about public service development and the direction of future reform. Project aims include: Deepening the impact of the emergent Scottish approach to public service delivery and reform by examining what works and what doesn’t in the Scottish model; Providing a wider understanding of the transformational change in the delivery of public services; and Embedding a unique and collaborative action-orientated approach to policy making and delivery. 2.2 What Works Scotland brings together the Universities of Glasgow and Edinburgh, academics across Scotland, with partners from Joint Improvement Team, NHS Health Scotland, Inspiring Scotland, IRISS (Institution for Research and Innovation in Social Services), SCVO (Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations), Glasgow Centre for Population Health, NHS Education for Scotland and the Improvement Service. 2.3 Aberdeenshire CPP successfully applied to be one of the four case study areas and has been partnered with a sub-team within the What Works Scotland team, who will provide support in delivering this initiative. Aberdeenshire has also been partnered with case-study shadow areas, who will work with us to identify and share best-practice. 2.4 Aberdeenshire CPP have proposed the following three work streams to be the focus on What Works Scotland in Aberdeenshire: Local Community Planning Health and Social Care Integration – Locality Planning Road Safety – prevention and intervention (Safe Drive Stay Alive) Item: 15 Page: 2 2.5 A Collaborative Action Research Planning Event was held on 12 November 2014 and focussed on our three proposed projects and the development of project plans. Appendix 1 to this item includes a summary of the issues discussed. 2.6 Further meetings with our research partners and the wider What Works Scotland team will follow in late November and early December. The project plan will be circulated to the Board in due course. 3 Equalities, Financial and Staffing Implications 3.1 What Works Scotland has funding for three years up until the end of 2018. 3.2 The community planning team will be able to dedicate some capacity to take forward What Works Scotland in Aberdeenshire. Where appropriate, colleagues and partners will also be involved with this work. In addition to the wider What Works Scotland team, a sub-team has been assigned to provide dedicated support to Aberdeenshire. 3.3 In line with the statutory obligations on public bodies arising from the Equality Act 2010, an Equalities Impact Assessment will be carried out as and when the detailed implementation plan is developed. Francesca Ainsworth, Partnership Analyst and Sophie Humphries, Strategic Development Officer (Community Planning) 17 November 2014 Health and Social Care Integration Local Community Planning What makes an effective partnership working in the newly formed Integration Authorities? Who represents the voice of the community? What added value does local community planning offer? What makes an effective partnership? How to balance and validate quantitative/qualitative data with anecdotal evidence/community engagement to inform decision making and service delivery? How to balance and validate quantitative/qualitative data with anecdotal evidence/community engagement to inform decision making and service delivery? What types of evidence need to be balanced to inform decision making and service delivery? What is the best evidence to document the impact of community planning? How to tackle any tensions/issues with crosssector partners, management structures and communities? How to maintain equity in the delivery of health and social care services from a central perspective whilst maintaining the flexibility to adapt to local needs/priorities (30 settlements)? How to maintain equity in local community planning whilst maintaining the flexibility to adapt to local needs/priorities? How to balance bottom-up and top-down approaches to local community planning? How to tackle disconnect between the CPP Board/Executive and the Local Community Planning Groups? APPENDIX 1 Item: 15 Page: 3 Road Safety (Safe Drive Stay Alive) What is the most effective configuration of partners/partnerships to achieve prevention and early intervention to improve road safety? What makes an effective partnership? Using local vs national data to inform strategies for tackling road safety. What types of evidence need to be balanced to inform decision making and service delivery? What data/information can be used to evidence the potential impact of Safe Drive Stay Alive to determine its effectiveness in reducing road casualties/fatalities? How to address the culture/attitudes of communities and organisations around responsibility and accountability for road safety improvement? How to manage UK, Scottish Government, Police Scotland strategic approaches with Grampian/Aberdeenshire approaches to road safety? How to balance bottom-up and top-down approaches to local community planning? How to balance any tensions between local and national approaches to road safety (prevention vs. enforcement)? Item: 15 Page: 4 Item: 16 Page: 1 REPORT TO COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD – 26 NOVEMBER 2014 2014-20 EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND ALLOCATION 1 Recommendation 1.1 It is recommended that the Board notes the provisional award of European Social Fund money to Aberdeenshire and mandates the Tackling Poverty and Inequalities Group to consider project ideas. 2. Discussion 2.1 New European funding programmes are set to run from 2014-20, many of which will be managed nationally by the Scottish Government. Negotiations have taken place between Local Government and the Scottish Government through COSLA and Scottish Local Authorities Economic Development (SLAED) over the allocation of European Social Fund (ESF) money to local authority areas. These discussions have resulted in a formal provisional ESF allocation to Aberdeenshire of up to £8.05 million. 2.2 While the allocation is to be welcomed in principle, it is important to recognise that these are not based on local requests/applications for funding, but were instead calculated by COSLA, SLAED and the Scottish Government. Accepting these funds would therefore obligate Community Planning partners to deliver activities in a way which may not be compatible with the Partnership’s priorities, resources and existing contractual arrangements. Furthermore, Community Planning partners would need to provide match funding to projects: Activity EU allocation £6.45m (45%) Council/Partner allocation £7.88m (55%) Potential Total Project Cost £14.33m Employability Pipelines Poverty and Social Inclusion TOTAL £1.6 m (45%) £1.96m (55%) £3.56m £8.05m £9.84m £17.89m 2.3 It is therefore unlikely that all of the provisionally-allocated funds will be drawn down, given relatively low unemployment in the area and the need to provide match funding. Funds should only be drawn down where they can add value to existing activity. 2.4 Funds are available for the following purposes: 2.4.1 £6.45 million to deliver an Employability Pipeline. The concept of the Employability Pipeline is to provide an integrated approach to employability service provision in a geographical area through a seamless process of engagement with clients across different agencies. Item: 16 Page: 2 2.4.2 £1.6 million to support poverty and social inclusion measures. Funds are available to support active inclusion and social entrepreneurship. The draft ESF Operational programme is relatively open on the activities which can be supported and further clarification from the Scottish Government on this initiative is required. Themes of social care, childcare and financial inclusion have been mooted by Scottish Government civil servants. 2.5 It should be noted that while the allocation letter was sent to Aberdeenshire Council, ESF funds are awarded to the Aberdeenshire area rather than the Council and there is an expectation that the Community Planning Partnership would be used as a vehicle to deliver or co-ordinate projects. 2.6 In order to formally secure allocations, there will be a requirement for Aberdeenshire Council as Lead Partner to complete application forms for funds. In spite of the fact that the Operational Programmes for ESF and ERDF are not yet approved, it is expected that the Scottish Government will require applications to be submitted in December 2014. 2.7 The matter has been discussed at the Tackling Poverty and Inequality Group and it is recommended that further discussions between CPP partners are held within this forum to develop project ideas. 3. Equalities, Staffing and Financial Implications 3.1 There are no equalities implications from this report. Equalities matters would be taken into consideration during the completion of any funding bids. ESF funds are targeted on social inclusion of disadvantaged groups. 3.2 There is a potential match funding cost to Aberdeenshire Council and partners of up to £14.74 million from 2015-2020. This would need to be identified from existing budgets (e.g. Business Gateway, core staff) and/or new resources which will be challenging in the present financial climate. There is also a risk when managing European funding that if there are errors made in the management/administration of projects, grant may be recovered by the Scottish Government. Project spend also needs to be forecast accurately and managed as if a project underspends, committed match funding is used first which can lead to a disproportionate reduction in the grant drawn down. 3.3 In terms of staffing implications, one or more Project Managers would need to be appointed to manage the projects. There have been cases where projects have been managed by Council staff in addition to their day jobs which has led to errors, resource issues and ultimately repayment of grant to the Scottish Government. It is also recommended that the European Team undertake enhanced monitoring of projects in terms of both finances and project delivery and that each project is audited annually to ensure compliance with EU rules and requirements. 3.4 Furthermore, existing staff involved in the delivery of employability, poverty and social inclusion and business support may find all or part of their post becomes EU-funded, which may change the way in which their jobs are undertaken (e.g. the need to record information in a certain way and be aware Item: 16 Page: 3 of EU rules and requirements). Finally, all applications and claims will need to be processed by the Council’s European Team which should be deliverable within existing resources. Martin Brebner, Team Manager – European Policy & Programmes, Aberdeenshire Council 13 November 2014
© Copyright 2024