D4 Business |
2R
| SUNDAY, DECEMBER 28, 2014
MutualFunds
LUMP OF COAL AWARDS
FOR 2014, PART 1
Your Funds
Chuck Jaffe
Syndicated columnist
The mar
ket may be
up this year,
but that
didn’t put a
stop to
naughtiness
around the
fund world.
My list has been made,
and checked twice, and it’s
time for the 19th annual
Lump of Coal Awards, my
twopart holiday tradition
of easing Santa’s burden by
singling out the bad boys
and girls of the fund indus
try who deserve nothing
more than a lousy lump of
lignite in their Christmas
stockings this year.
While the long bull mar
ket has covered up a lot of
performance flubs, Lumps
of Coal are about more than
just fund returns.
The Lump of Coal Awards
recognize managers, execu
tives, firms, watchdogs and
other fundindustry fum
blers for actions, attitudes,
behaviors, execution or
results that are misguided,
bumbling, offensive, disin
genuous, hamhanded,
graceless, reprehensible or
just plain stupid.
And the losers are:
Management for Giant 5
Total Investment System
for thinking that investors
actually care what’s in a
fund’s ticker symbol.
In March, the ticker sym
bol on Giant 5 was changed
from FIVEX to CASHX.
While investors love fun,
cute ticker symbols, they
like performance better.
Giant 5, which is a fund
offunds, badly lagged its
peer group all year — and
over the last five years,
according to Morningstar —
and is barely in positive
territory. If management
wanted an appropriate
ticker, they should have
gone for SUCKX.
The Allianz Global In
vestors Retirement Funds,
for the year’s most offtar
get performance.
According to Lipper, the
laggard in the “mixedasset
target 2015” category was
Allianz Global Investors
2015. Its 2020 sister fund
was dead last in its peer
group. As was the 2025
fund in its category. And the
2030, 2035, 2040, 2045
and 2055+ funds, all of
them hindmost in their
asset classes, with gains of
no more than 3.7 percent.
Only the Allianz 2050
fund wasn’t feeding on the
bottom, but it’s close; it’s
worst in the category for the
last quarter, leaving it sec
ondworst in the 2050 field
this year. Relative to its
eight targetdated siblings,
that’s a winner.
The Sector Rotation
Fund — run by Navigator
Money Management — for
failing to act its age.
Navigator, which runs the
Sector Rotation Fund
(NAVFX) as well as a news
letter called “The Money
Navigator,” got clipped in
January by the Securities
and Exchange Commission
for “cherrypicking” the best
recommendations and time
periods to promote its ser
vices. Regulators took par
ticular issue with a newslet
ter article which claimed
that the Sector Rotation
Fund produced an average
annual return of 10.25
percent from August 31,
2002 through October 31,
2011. Similar claims were
made numerous times by
the firm, on its website, in
newsletters and on fund
manager and company
President Mark Grimaldi’s
Twitter account.
Alas, the fund didn’t exist
before Dec. 30, 2009;
claims dating back to 2002
were poppycock, based
instead on a model portfolio
from one of Grimaldi’s other
newsletters.
Regulators are notorious
ly slow to catch stuff like
that, yet they found the
error before Navigator
officials did. Ironically, the
fund’s real track record is
pretty good; the only prob
lem with that record is that
it’s short. Time solves that;
fund managers don’t get to
use hypotheticals as some
sort of fake ID to seem older
than they really are.
Bruce Berkowitz, man
ager at Fairholme Fund
(FAIRX) for giving up
more than a year’s worth
of gains in a single day.
On Oct. 1, a court ruling
sent the value of securities
tied to Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac tumbling; as a
result, Fairholme lost nearly
10 percent of its value in
one shot, falling back to
levels it had last seen in July
of 2013.
Bets on Fannie and Fred
die — two government
sponsored enterprises in the
mortgage business — ac
counted for about 15 per
cent of Fairholme’s portfo
lio. Berkowitz has never
apologized for being fo
cused — and shouldn’t —
but in this case, he had a big
hand in his own demise, as
the plunge (some of Fannie
and Freddie’s preferred
stocks were down up to 50
percent) came after
Berkowitz lost a legal bid to
force the bailedout enter
prises to share profits with
private investors.
Berkowitz is determined
to fight the fight, and may
win it yet, but investors who
were just feeling like he had
regained the magic touch
that made him one of Morn
ingstar’s “Managers of the
Decade” for the 2000s were
rightly shaken.
Morningstar, for the
performance — or lack
thereof — of its “Managers
of the Decade.”
We’re nearly halfway into
the 2010s, and the top man
agers of the ’00s are embar
rassing themselves.
Berkowitz and Fairholme
rank in the bottom 1 per
centile of the largevalue
category for the last five
years. Bill Gross has now
left Pimco after belowaver
age performance in three of
the five years of the 2010s
and only Morningstar’s
third winner, David Herro
of Oakmark International
(OAKIX), has managed to
come away untarnished
(though he was well below
his category average this
year). And that’s after Legg
Mason’s Bill Miller spent the
2000s ruining the legend he
made en route to becoming
Morningstar’s “Manager of
the Decade” for the 1990s.
This big prize may be the
ultimate sign that past per
formance is no guarantee of
future success.
The Geoff Bobroff Me
morial Lump of Coal —
found in a fund’s paper
work — goes to manage
ment of the CMG funds,
for namedropping.
Bobroff — an industry
consultant and former
chairman of the Matthews
Asia Funds — died of a heart
attack last summer. He was
an essential source to me
over two decades, and the
best and mosttrusted
source to two generations of
journalists covering mutual
funds; he also was my key
sounding board for the
LumpofCoal Awards for
18 years He’d have appreci
ated this one:
Capital Management
Group launched CMG Man
aged High Yield Fund
(CHYOX) on Oct. 6, and
filed to change the fund’s
name — it becomes CMG
Tactical Bond on Dec. 30 —
and principal investment
strategy a month later.
When managers can’t
stick with what they’re
doing for more than a
month, their actions tell
investors more than words
just how much conviction
they have in what they’re
doing.
Fund managers with no
money in their fund, be
cause we’re better off
giving them coal than our
money.
Several studies this year
reported that more than
half of all fund managers
have zero invested in their
own funds. There’s a big
body of research showing
that the more insiders’ inter
ests are in line with yours,
the better a fund’s riskad
justed performance.
Next week: All things
gross (as in Bill Gross), and
the Lump of Coal MisMan
ager of the Year.
Chuck Jaffe is senior columnist for
MarketWatch.
He can be reached at
cjaffe@marketwatch.com or at
P.O. Box 70,
Cohasset, MA 020250070.
Copyright 2014, MarketWatch
Fund Tracker
Weekly spotlight on mutual fund performance
Winners and losers: A mutualfund scorecard
Fund Wkly % YTD %
obj return return
Biggest funds
American Funds A AmcpA p
American Funds A AMutlA p
American Funds A BalA p
American Funds A BondA p
American Funds A CapIBA p
American Funds A CapWGA p
American Funds A FdInvA p
American Funds A GwthA p
American Funds A IncoA p
American Funds A ICAA p
American Funds A N PerA px
American Funds A SmCpA pe
American Funds A WshA p
Artisan Funds Intl
BlackRock Instl StrIncoOpp
BlackRock Instl EquityDv
BlackRock Instl GlbAlloc r
Dimensional Fds EmMCrEq
Dimensional Fds EmMktV
Dimensional Fds USLgVa
Dodge&Cox Balanced
Dodge&Cox Income
Dodge&Cox IntlStk
Dodge&Cox Stock
DoubleLine Funds TRBd I
FPA Funds FPACres
Fidelity Freedom FF2020K
Fidelity Freedom FF2030K
Fidelity Invest Balanc
Fidelity Invest Contra
Fidelity Invest GroCo
Fidelity Invest LowP r
Fidelity Invest Puritn
Fidelity Invest TotalBd
Fidelity Spart Adv 500IdxAdv
Fidelity Spart Adv TotMktAd r
Frank/Temp Frnk A IncomA p
Frank/TmpFrnkAdv GlbBdAdv
Harbor Funds CapApInst
Harbor Funds Intl r
Loomis Sayles LSBondI
MFS Funds I ValueI
Metro West Fds TotRtBdI
Oakmark Funds I EqtyInc r
Oakmark Funds I Intl
Oakmark Funds I Oakmark
Oppenheimer Y DevMktY
PIMCO Instl PIMS AllAsset
PIMCO Instl PIMS TotRt
PIMCO Funds Instl Income
Price Funds BlChip
Price Funds CapApp
Price Funds EqInc
Price Funds EqIndex
Price Funds Growth
Price Funds MidCap
Price Funds N Horiz
Price Funds N Inc
Price Funds Ret2020
Price Funds Ret2030
Price Funds Value
Schwab Funds S&P Sel
Vanguard Admiral 500Adml
Vanguard Admiral GNMA Ad
Vanguard Admiral HlthCr
Vanguard Admiral ITAdml
Vanguard Admiral ITGrAdm
Vanguard Admiral LtdTrAd
Vanguard Admiral MCpAdml
Vanguard Admiral PrmCap r
Vanguard Admiral STIGrAd
Vanguard Admiral SmCAdm
Vanguard Admiral TtlBAdml
Vanguard Admiral WellslAdm
Vanguard Admiral WelltnAdm
Vanguard Admiral WdsrIIAd
Vanguard Fds TotIntBInv
Vanguard Fds DivdGro
Vanguard Fds STAR
Vanguard Fds TgtRe2015
Vanguard Fds TgRe2020
Vanguard Fds TgtRe2025
Vanguard Fds TgRe2030
Vanguard Fds TgtRe2035
Vanguard Fds TgtRe2040
Vanguard Fds TgtRe2045
Vanguard Idx Fds TotlIntl
XC
LV
BL
IB
BL
GL
LC
LG
BL
LC
GL
GL
LC
IL
GT
EI
MP
EM
EM
LV
BL
IB
IL
LV
MT
MP
MP
MP
BL
LG
XG
MC
BL
IB
SP
XC
BL
WB
LG
IL
GT
LC
IB
BL
IL
LC
EM
MP
IB
GT
LG
BL
EI
SP
LG
MG
SG
IB
MP
MP
LV
SP
SP
MT
HB
IM
IB
SM
MC
LC
SB
SC
IB
BL
BL
LV
WB
EI
BL
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
IL
+0.7
+1.2
+0.9
0.0
+0.8
+0.6
+1.3
+1.1
+0.8
+0.8
+0.7
+1.1
+1.5
+0.5
+0.2
+1.6
+0.6
+1.0
+0.9
+2.1
+1.0
+0.1
+0.4
+1.5
NA
+1.0
+0.8
+1.0
+0.9
+0.8
+1.4
+1.0
+0.8
0.0
+1.4
+1.5
+1.7
0.0
+1.1
+0.1
+0.3
+1.1
0.1
+1.1
+0.6
+1.6
+1.4
NA
0.0
NA
+0.9
+0.8
+1.6
+1.4
+1.2
+1.5
+0.9
0.1
+0.8
+1.0
+1.5
+1.3
+1.4
0.0
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.1
+1.6
+0.1
0.1
+1.8
0.1
+0.4
+0.7
+1.2
+0.1
+0.7
+0.6
+0.6
+0.8
+0.8
+1.0
+1.1
+1.2
+1.1
+0.9
+13.3
+14.4
+9.6
+5.1
+7.9
+5.4
+10.3
+10.4
+9.5
+13.8
+4.3
+2.2
+12.7
+0.8
+4.0
+10.8
+2.9
1.1
4.3
+11.3
+9.7
+5.2
+1.4
+11.8
NA
+7.5
+6.0
+6.8
+11.2
+10.9
+15.8
+8.1
+11.6
+5.1
+15.2
+13.9
+5.0
+1.7
+11.6
5.2
+4.8
+12.0
+5.7
+7.7
3.9
+12.9
4.3
NA
+4.4
NA
+10.3
+13.1
+8.8
+15.0
+9.9
+14.4
+6.8
+5.4
+6.3
+6.9
+14.8
+15.2
+15.3
+6.5
+30.1
+7.0
+5.4
+1.7
+15.1
+20.4
+1.6
+8.4
+5.5
+8.4
+10.8
+12.8
+8.4
+13.4
+8.1
+7.1
+7.7
+7.9
+8.1
+8.3
+8.3
+8.3
3.1
XC
SP
XC
Vanguard Idx Fds TotStk
Vanguard Instl Fds InstIdx
Vanguard Instl Fds InsTStPlus
5yr %
return
+15.2
+13.9
+12.2
+4.5
+9.1
+9.3
+13.5
+13.5
+11.3
+13.4
+10.6
+11.6
+15.0
+9.1
+5.9
+13.0
+6.7
+2.9
+0.2
+17.0
+12.8
+5.1
+8.2
+15.6
NS
+10.6
+8.3
+9.5
+11.7
+15.0
+17.8
+15.5
+11.7
+5.3
+15.5
+15.7
+9.6
+6.1
+14.7
+5.9
+8.6
+14.5
+6.9
+9.8
+9.9
+16.3
+5.8
NA
+5.0
NA
+16.8
+13.2
+13.3
+15.2
+15.9
+17.4
+21.3
+4.4
+10.2
+11.5
+16.1
+15.4
+15.5
+4.2
+20.3
+4.6
+6.3
+2.0
+16.9
+16.4
+2.9
+16.7
+4.3
+9.6
+11.4
+14.2
NS
+14.8
+10.2
+8.9
+9.7
+10.2
+10.8
+11.3
+11.6
+11.6
+4.6
Best performers
Voya Funds Cl A RussiaA p
Frank/Tmp Frnk Adv TFrMkAd
FPA Funds Paramnt
Direxion Fds EmgMBull p
ProFunds Inv Cl UltLatinAm
Direxion Fds NatRBull2X
Jacob Funds USSmCG I
ProFunds Inv Cl UltraJapan
Jacob Funds MicCGr I
ProFunds Inv Cl UltSmCap
ProFunds Inv Cl Oil&Gas
ProFunds Inv Cl InternetUlt
Fidelity Selects UtilGr
Fidelity Adv Foc A Utilities
Rydex Investor Utilities
Pacific Advisors SCapValA t
Hennessy Funds GasUtlInv r
ProFunds Inv Cl BasicMatls
Frank/Temp Frnk A UtilsA p
Invest Managers TowleDpV
Direxion Fds LatAmBull
Fidelity Selects InEqp
ProFunds Inv Cl UltMidCap
Wells Fargo Adv A Util&TelA
ProFunds Inv Cl UltDow30
Buffalo Funds MicroCp t
Fidelity Invest Utility
Litman Gregory Fds SmallCos I
SchdSmCV r
Amer Century Inv Util
Worst performers
+1.4 +13.9 +15.6
+1.4 +15.3 +15.5
+1.5 +14.1 +15.8
Fund Wkly % YTD %
obj return return
EM
EM
GL
SQ
SQ
SE
SG
SQ
SG
SQ
SQ
SQ
UT
UT
UT
SC
UT
SQ
UT
SV
SQ
SE
SQ
UT
SQ
SG
UT
SC
SV
UT
35.7
14.5
1.7
12.8
37.3
21.6
+1.2
+10.4
4.5
+6.7
15.1
+3.3
+24.1
+23.6
+25.8
21.5
+23.3
+3.9
+27.9
+2.4
31.2
+1.1
+18.1
+18.5
+19.1
6.2
+15.0
3.2
11.7
+22.7
6.7
+4.2
+11.4
6.6
19.3
1.6
+0.1
+13.1
+12.2
+24.6
+8.4
+26.9
+14.6
+14.3
+12.5
+12.4
+18.3
+8.8
+14.2
NS
18.5
+14.4
+27.4
+12.6
+24.1
+20.9
+14.6
+13.8
+9.2
+13.0
Fund Wkly % YTD %
obj return return
5yr %
return
ProFunds Inv Cl BiotechUlt
Wells Fargo Adv A PrecMtlA
ProFunds Inv Cl UltBear
Rydex Dynamic InvSP5St H
Tocqueville Fds Gold t
Fidelity Selects Gold r
OCM Funds GoldInv t
Rydex Investor Biotech
ProFunds Inv Cl UltShNq100
Frank/Temp Frnk A GoldPrM A
Rydex Dynamic InvNasdSt H
USAA Group PrecMM
Fidelity Invest SCmdtyStrt
GoodHaven
Comstock Partners CapVlA
Midas Funds Midas Fd t
Leuthold Funds GrizzlyShrt
Rydex H Class InvRusSt
Harbor Funds CmdtRRtn I
ICON Fds Hlthcare S
Amer Century Inv GlGold
First Eagle SGenGld p
Schwab Funds HlthCare
Fidelity Advisor A Biotech A
Frank/Temp Frnk A BioDisA p
Invesco Funds A GoldPrec p
Credit Suisse Comm ComRet t
Federated Instl FPruBearIS
ProFunds Inv Cl PrecMetal
Putnam Funds A GlblHlthA
SQ
AU
SQ
SQ
AU
AU
AU
HB
SQ
AU
SQ
AU
SE
XC
SQ
AU
SQ
SQ
SE
HB
AU
AU
HB
HB
HB
AU
SE
SQ
SQ
HB
+8.7
+6.3
+4.7
+4.6
+4.5
+4.4
+4.3
+4.3
+4.1
+4.0
+3.6
+3.5
+3.4
+3.4
+3.3
+3.3
+3.2
+3.2
+3.2
+3.1
+3.1
+3.1
+3.1
+3.1
+3.1
+3.1
+3.0
+3.0
+3.0
+3.0
5yr %
return
5.8
3.1
2.8
2.7
2.6
2.5
2.4
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.9
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.6
+47.8
9.3
28.6
28.5
4.9
9.9
6.7
+34.5
37.2
13.1
36.7
9.4
16.0
8.6
18.1
29.0
12.0
9.7
17.0
+26.0
12.7
3.8
+22.9
+35.2
+34.8
9.4
15.2
15.7
35.7
+28.6
+43.5
13.2
32.3
31.8
10.3
15.6
12.5
+28.4
37.3
15.5
37.1
15.3
5.6
NS
18.7
23.6
17.2
19.0
3.1
+19.4
14.7
10.5
+20.0
+31.6
+30.0
12.1
5.0
16.1
25.0
+17.3
Footnotes: e: Ex capitalgains distribution. f: Previous day{rsquo}s
quote. n or nl: No upfront sales charge. p: Fund assets are used to
pay for distribution costs. r: redemption fee or contingent deferred
sales load may apply. s: Stock dividend or split. t: Both p and r. x: Ex
cash dividend. NE: Data in question. NS: Fund did not exist at the
start date. NA: No information available.
Key to abbreviations and footnotes:
Fund objectives: AB: Longterm topgrade corporate and govern
ment bonds. AU: Gold oriented. BL: Balanced. EI: Equity income.
EM: Emerging markets. EU: European region. GL: Global (includes
U.S.). GM: General municipal bond. GT: General taxable bond. HB:
Health and biotech. HC: Highyield taxable bond. HM: Highyield
municipal bond. IB: Intermediateterm investmentgrade corporate
bond. IG: Intermediateterm Treasury/government debt. IL:
International (outside U.S.). IM: Intermediateterm municipal bond.
LC: Largecap core. LG: Largecap growth. LT: Latin American. LU:
Longterm Treasury/government debt. LV: Largecap value. MC:
Midcap core. MG: Midcap growth. MP: Mixed portfolio (stocks and
bonds). MT: Mortgage. MV: Midcap value. NM: Insured municipal
bond. NR: Natural resources. PR: Pacific region. SB: Shortterm
investmentgrade corporate bond. SC: Smallcap core. SE: Sector
(specific industries). SG: Smallcap growth. SM: Shortterm munici
pal debt. SP: S&P 500. SQ: Specialty diversified equity. SS: Single
state municipal debt. SU: Shortterm Treasury/government debt.
SV: Smallcap value. TK: Science and technology. UN: Unclassified.
UT: Utility. WB: World bond. XC: Multicap core. XG: Multicap
growth. XV: Multicap value
5year % return: Annualized performance over the past five years.
Top 5 mutual funds by objective, yeartodate % return
Emerging markets
InstAXfd r
AME Fd
EmergAs r
EAsiaA t
EmMktI
Price Funds
Price Funds
Fidelity Invest
Fidelity Advisor A
Virtus Funds I
Equity income
Utilities p
ValLdrs
ParnEqty
EqInc
DivInco Y
Invesco Funds A
Paydenfunds
Parnassus Funds
JPMorgan Sel Cls
BMO Funds
Health | biotech
HlthSciA
Biotch
Biotech A
BioDisA p
Biotech
Prudential Fds A
Fidelity Selects
Fidelity Advisor A
Frank/Temp Frnk A
Rydex Investor
Global
Lazard Instl
Vanguard Fds
Guinness Atkinson
Cohen & Steers
USAA Group
GblInfra I
GblMnV Inv
GlblInno
GblInfra I
CapGr
International
Guggenheim Funds
Fidelity Invest
Fidelity Invest
Virtus Funds I
Fidelity Advisor T
Largecap core
Vanguard Fds
Vanguard Admiral
PNC Funds
BMO Funds
JPMorgan R Cl
WldEqIncA
AggIntl
Canada
ForOppI
IntCAT p
YTD %
return
Midcap core
+11.0
+9.7
+6.7
+6.2
+5.0
FPA Funds
JPMorgan Sel Cls
Dreyfus
Davenport Funds
Vanguard Admiral
YTD %
return
Smallcap core
+17.8
+16.3
+16.0
+15.4
+15.3
Hennessy Funds
Forum Funds
Lazard Instl
Vanguard Fds
JPMorgan Sel Cls
YTD %
return
Natural resources
+36.4
+35.7
+35.2
+34.8
+34.5
Invest Managers
Invest Managers
Center Coast
Oppenheimer A
Oppenheimer Y
YTD %
return
Pacific region
YTD %
return
Longterm bond
+19.7
+14.7
+14.0
+13.3
+12.0
Matthews Asian
IndiaInv r
Frank/Temp Frnk A IndiaGrA p
Eaton Vance A
GrIndia t
Neuberger&BermFd GtChinEq I
Hennessy Funds
Japan Inv
+59.3
+40.1
+36.5
+17.8
+9.3
Vanguard Idx Fds
Vanguard Admiral
GuideStone Funds
Del Inv Instl
Legg Mason A
YTD %
return
Science | technology
YTD %
return
Longterm U.S.
+39.8
+38.9
+28.2
+26.7
+25.8
Vanguard Instl Fds
Wasatch
Vanguard Admiral
Fidelity Spartan
Price Funds
YTD %
return
Mortgage
+6.1
+3.9
+3.8
+3.2
+3.2
YTD %
return
PrmcpCor +20.7
PrmCap r +20.4
LCCrEqI p +18.1
LowVolEq I +17.9
IntrepAm +17.9
Fidelity Selects
Fidelity Advisor I
Columbia Class A
Columbia Class A
Price Funds
Peren
IntpdMCp
ActMidA
EqtyOpps
MCpAdml
CorGrow O
GoldenSCC
USSmMid I
StrSCEqInv
MExpEnhI
Sector
+17.6
+16.7
+16.0
+15.9
+15.1
Fidelity Selects
Fidelity Selects
ICON Fds
Fidelity Selects
Fidelity Selects
YTD %
return
Balanced
+14.4
+12.8
+12.4
+11.1
+10.6
WellsFargoAdv A
Meeder Funds
Meeder Funds
Price Funds
Hennessy Funds
YTD %
return
Intermediate bond
MLP&Engy +12.6
MLP&EnI I +12.5
MLPFoc I
+8.1
StlpthAlpha +7.9
Alpha Y
+6.9
Electr
Electronic
SelComm A
GlobTech
GlbTech
Gold oriented
GAMCO Funds
First Eagle
Tocqueville Fds
OCM Funds
Wells Fargo Adv A
YTD %
return
GoldAAA
SGenGld p
Gold t
GoldInv t
PrecMtlA
3.5
3.8
4.9
6.7
9.3
YTD %
return
Trans
Air
ConsStapl
ConStap
CstHo
YTD %
return
DivCapBldr
AggGr p
DynaGr p
CapApp
Eq&Inc Inv
Invest Managers
MorganStanley Inst
Dimensional Fds
Western Asset
GuggenheimFunds
Managed Acct Srs
VanguardAdmiral
AMG Managers
Frank/Temp Frk A
SEI Portfolios
+34.2
+27.7
+17.2
+16.7
+14.8
CutwSelInc
CorPlsFxI
ITExQual
CorePlus I
USIntrBdA
LTBnd
LTGrAdml
ExtDrGS4
ExtDurI
WACpBdA
+15.3
+15.1
+14.3
+13.1
+12.2
YTD %
return
+8.2
+7.8
+7.6
+7.4
+7.2
YTD %
return
+18.6
+17.2
+16.2
+15.1
+7.7
YTD %
return
ExDurTreas +43.3
USTryFd +30.9
LTsyAdml +24.0
SpLTTrAd r +24.0
USTLg
+22.2
YTD %
return
US MrtgInst
GNMA Ad
IntDurGv x
StrMPrt
GNMA A
+7.7
+6.5
+6.4
+6.4
+6.4
SOME HAVE
ENOUGH
TO RETIRE;
SOME ...
Investing
Scott Burns
Syndicated columnist
Q: My
question is
very sim
ple.
I am 55
years old. I
have a
govern
ment job
from which I can retire and
have about a $4,000a
month annuity.
I also have a house pay
ment of $1,600 (still owe
25plus years), but no
other major debt.
And I have saved
$450,000 in a 401(k)
account.
Can I retire based on this
scenario?
A: With an income of
$4,000 a month, some
home equity and $450,000
in savings, you can retire if
you are willing to do what
it takes to live on the given
resources.
Lots of people do it. And
they do it without moving
to Mexico, Thailand or
Panama.
It’s really a question of
how much you want to
stop working and what you
are willing to do to achieve
that goal.
But if you want to main
tain your current lifestyle,
shelter arrangements and
medical insurance cover
age, it’s probably too early
for you.
The reason is your age.
At 55, you have a very
good chance of living an
other 30 to 40 years. The
resources you have are
likely to look pretty limit
ed.
Q: I turn 65 in Decem
ber; my wife turns 61 in
November. We are consid
ering retirement.
Here is our current situa
tion:
(1) No creditcard debt.
We pay off every month.
(2) No mortgage on a
$675,000 home.
(3) Two latemodel cars
that are paid off in full.
(4) We have $50,000 in
our checking account.
(5) We have $20,000 in
a Vanguard taxable ac
count.
(6) Our combined esti
mated monthly Social
Security benefit will be
$5,000.
(7) Our combined
monthly pension benefits
will be $3,000.
(8) Our total 401(k)
balance is $3 million.
Can we retire now and
be financially secure that
we will not run out of
money?
A. Of course you can
retire!
In fact, let’s put it anoth
er way: If you can’t, who
could?
But let me tell you why.
Trust me, you aren’t the
only person with lots of
assets who can’t make the
jump because they don’t
know how much is
enough.
The one figure missing
from the facts you sent is
your anticipated retire
ment spending.
But we can squeeze it
out of the information you
sent. Here’s how. The
biggest single expense for
most Americans after
retirement is the cost of
shelter, their home. A
recent report from EBRI,
the Employee Benefit
Research Institute, found
that Americans age 60 to
64 devoted 42 percent of
their spending to shelter.
The proportion remains
stable as people age, in
cluding for people 75 and
over.
What could go wrong?
Take your pick from a
Menu of Worry. But con
sidered against the human
condition, you’ve got it
made.
So enjoy it.
Think about others. Help
others. The more you do,
the deeper you will under
stand, and enjoy, what you
have.
Questions:
scott@scottburns.com
Copyright 2014, Universal Press
Syndicate
© Copyright 2025