Economic Research Week in Focus 16 January 2015 Switzerland says no to ECB policy By decoupling the Swiss franc from the euro, the Swiss National Bank yesterday made history. We demonstrate that in doing so the SNB has revealed its distrust of the ECB’s ultra-expansionary monetary stance (page 2). The ECB will no doubt begin a new, risky chapter in its monetary policy history next Thursday by agreeing to broad-based government bond purchases. This is likely to take the form of national central banks buying up their own country's bonds at their own risk (page 3). The euro can be expected to sustain further losses. SNB has dumped the euro Swiss francs per euro, minute data of 15 January 1.25 1.20 1.15 1.10 1.05 1.00 0.95 0.90 0.85 0.80 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 Source: Bloomberg China: CNY to strengthen in the second half of the year. Following its recent slide, we look for the CNY to remain stable in the first half of 2015. In H2, other factors will become more prominent – notably the current account surplus – which will drive CNY higher. Page 6 Oil price: An end to the horror. The oil price slide is primarily being driven by OPEC’s efforts to flood the market in order to impact on the US shale boom. Against this backdrop, the oil price should continue to drop further and hit bottom around 40 USD per barrel. But we look for lower supply to drive the price towards 70 USD per barrel by year-end. Page 7 Product Idea: Forward Extra on diesel. We recommend using current cheap diesel prices to hedge against the expectation of higher prices later in the year. Page 8 Outlook for the week of 19 to 23 January 2015 Economic data: Sentiment indicators in the euro zone should continue to climb next week with the ZEW index and PMIs leading the way. Page 11 Bond market: Expectations of a QE programme by the ECB will drive Bund yields to new lows. This process is being exacerbated by globally falling inflation expectations. But the Greek election might prevent a bigger decline in peripheral yield premiums. Page 14 FX market: The SNB has surprisingly abandoned its policy of a minimum EUR-CHF rate, which has prompted changes to our Swiss franc forecasts. Page 15 Equity market: The DAX and MDAX should emerge as a winner from a weak euro and declining commodity prices. Page 16 Commodity market: The large number of net long positions held by speculative investors suggests that oil prices have not yet reached their low. But metal prices may start to rally a little from next week. Page 17 For important disclosure information please see page 20. research.commerzbank.com / Bloomberg: CBKR / Research APP available Chief economist Dr Jörg Krämer +49 69 136 23650 joerg.kraemer@commerzbank.com Editor: Peter Dixon +44 20 7475 4806 peter.dixon@commerzbank.com Economic Research | Week in Focus SNB allows franc gains – what now? Dr Ralph Solveen Tel. +49 69 136 22322 The Swiss National Bank has abandoned its floor for the EUR-CHF exchange rate, which means that the Swiss franc is likely to make further gains versus the euro. What else does the decision mean? The SNB is evidently no longer willing to follow the ECB's expected further loosening of monetary policy. It is thus ready to accept a negative inflation rate in order to avoid a further swelling of the real-estate bubble. However, the impact on the economy should be rather limited. After the SNB's surprise decision, there are grounds for expecting the Swiss franc to make further gains versus the euro in the coming months. We have revised our EUR-CHF forecast and now expect a rate of 0.98 at the end of the year (previous forecast 1.21, see also p.15 and p.18). But what else does the decision signify? These are the main aspects as we see it: • SNB seems to fear asset bubbles more than negative inflation: The decision may have been triggered in part by the expectation that the ECB will next week announce a government bond purchasing scheme (QE), thus further relaxing the monetary reins. 1 The SNB is evidently unwilling to follow this policy, given that the Swiss economy is in good shape and that real-estate prices have already risen sharply. But this move does seriously dent in the SNB’s credibility. It had after all consistently promised to prevent EUR-CHF falling below 1.20 by whatever means needed. The SNB is obviously more concerned about asset bubbles and the resulting threats to the stability of the financial system than by the likelihood of a negative inflation rate over a lengthy period of time – we now envisage consumer prices falling 1.5% this year (previously -0.6%). This is an interesting deviation from the ECB's view that deflation is the greatest threat to the euro zone economy. It remains to be seen whether other central banks (e.g. in Scandinavia) that have tended to relax the monetary stance in order to prevent their currencies appreciating too much, leading to subsequent disinflationary pressure, will follow the lead of the SNB. • Scepticism about the euro: Relentless upward pressure on the Swiss franc and the SNB's decision today show how widely the ECB is expected to continuing relaxing the monetary stance even further after next week’s QE decision, rather than introducing a change of course. This is in line with our expectation that the euro will remain weak. • Comparatively limited economic consequences: A much stronger Swiss franc obviously undermines Swiss price competitiveness, but we envisage only a limited impact on the economy, above all on account of its specific structure. Exports, for example, focus on highquality goods, the demand for which is unlikely to respond much to price changes. 2 We have therefore modified our Swiss growth forecast only marginally, and now expect real GDP growth of 1.3% this year (previous figure: 1.7%), with a similar result next year (see also p. 18). • Major SNB losses: As a result of its intervention in recent years, the SNB will likely have amassed foreign currency reserves of over 500bn CHF. Since the currency has made strong gains versus all other currencies, they now face serious losses when calculated in Swiss francs. The SNB booked large profits last year, but is likely to end 2015 well in the red. As this will reduce the transfer of central bank profits to the cantons (the SNB is legally required to distribute two-thirds of its net profit to the cantons, many of which rely on this as an important source of revenue), the SNB will no doubt come under political pressure. 1 2 2 See also "Swiss National Bank capitulates", Economic Briefing, 15 January 2015. See also "Switzerland: the ice is melting", Economic Insight, 12 December 2014. 16 January 2015 Economic Research | Week in Focus Dr Michael Schubert Tel. +49 69 136 23700 ECB on track for QE: the main points At next Thursday's meeting, the ECB will no doubt make good its promises and announce broad-based government bond purchases (QE). We have examined how this programme might look in detail. Above all, we expect national central banks will have to buy up their own country's bonds at their own risk. This would ensure that a new Greek government be cautious about advocating debt forgiveness, and could also result in greater support across the ECB Council. The markets are likely to respond to the announcement with cautious approval. Bund yields have probably not yet reached their lowest point, and the euro can be expected to sustain further losses. QE imminent At its last press conference in early December, the ECB said that at the start of 2015 it would be re-assessing the need for broad-based government bond purchases, i.e. QE. This course is likely to be adopted at next Thursday's meeting, since the two pre-requisites for additional measures named by the bank have now been met: • It has been clear since mid-December that the ECB will probably not manage to expand its balance sheet as planned to around €3 trillion with the measures adopted so far (TLTROs, ABS and covered bond purchases). Even the second TLTRO resulted in calls from the banks for only €130bn, so that the volume of the first two TLTROs together only amounted to just over half the possible allotment. Our view is still that in the absence of any additional measures the ECB would fall more than €700bn short of its balance-sheet objective. 3 • Longer-term inflation expectations have fallen again recently. The figure favoured by the ECB – the expected inflation rate, derived from inflation swaps in five years' time for the subsequent five years (5x5 expectation) – has subsequently reached an all-time low (see chart 1). At its meeting, the Council should also have the latest findings of the bank’s Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF). 4 These will no doubt reveal that from the standpoint of those polled, the ECB is even more likely to fall short of its inflation objective. Since the debt crisis hit in 2010, this probability has moved parallel to the (far more volatile) market-based inflation expectation. Greek election no obstacle But is a vote for QE a good idea just three days before the election in Greece? At least one ECB Council member (Hansson) has advised against it on the grounds that a possible new government in Greece might be hoping for debt rescheduling. In that case, the ECB should not CHART 1: Euro zone: mounting downside risks for inflation Five-year inflation-linked future swap rate in five years, probability according to SPF of inflation rate below 1.5% in five years (inverted scale) 2.9 5 2.7 10 15 2.5 20 2.3 25 2.1 30 1.9 35 1.7 1.5 2005 40 45 2006 2007 2008 2009 market expectation (lhs) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Likelihood (inflation < 1.5%) (rhs) Sources: ECB, Bloomberg, Commerzbank Research 3 " Euro zone – What you need to know about QE", Week in Focus, 14.11.2014. For technical reasons, these will probably not be published until the day after the meeting, but the Council members should have them at the meeting. 4 16 January 2015 3 Economic Research | Week in Focus announce Greek government bond purchases at the same time, as to do so would be in breach of the ban on monetary financing of the state, according to Hansson. There is unlikely to be a majority on the Council in favour of Hansson's proposal that a decision be postponed. After all, given the party landscape in Greece, a stable post-election government is by no means certain either, and the ECB will be reluctant to put off a decision for even longer. There is evidently a clear majority in favour of pushing ahead with QE, and as soon as possible. Greater approval if risk of losses is not shared The true motive for Hansson's proposal is probably his general unease about QE, something he shares with a number of other Council members. According to a report in the Handelsblatt, at least seven of the 25 members are critical of QE. It is against this backdrop that Executive Board member Coeuré stressed recently that an essential aspect shaping QE was to win over as many Council members as possible who have been warning of harmful side-effects. The Council will no doubt have discussed a number of options. The most likely outcome is that national central banks will buy up their own country's bonds at their own risk. This is not an ideal approach as far as the peripheral central banks are concerned. Nevertheless, they will probably vote in favour of it, as a programme of this nature substantially lowers the risk of losses from state bankruptcy. At the same time, it should reassure the QE sceptics. Bundesbank president Weidmann was the first to publicise the proposal in December. Klaas Knot warned at the turn of the year that the ECB should not reallocate loss risks without parliamentary consultations. He added that he would only vote for QE on stringent conditions. In addition, Ardo Hansson stated recently that the proposal deserved consideration. The ECB Council has reportedly discussed an option involving national central banks acquiring the lion's share of their country's government bonds at their own risk, and the ECB taking only a small share, with the risk of losses being borne equally. The Bundesbank might agree to this approach, according to unnamed sources. Other sources say that ECB purchases would be restricted to bonds with a very high rating (AAA or just below), i.e. the respective national central banks would buy fewer bonds. These sources have also said that the German government might accept this approach, and ECB President Draghi has probably made a recent bid for its support. Bond purchases across the euro zone Overall, though, bonds from all the euro countries are likely to be bought, as any proposal that only bonds from certain countries be purchased would not find a majority: 4 • Only bonds of countries with very high ratings: In taking this course, the ECB Council would be contradicting its tacit objective of supporting highly indebted countries. Moreover, ECB Chief Economist Praet issued a recent warning that if this path were chosen, the bank would have to buy up seriously bigger volumes in order to achieve the desired impact on inflation. • Only bonds from investment grade countries: This option would only exclude Greek and Cypriot bonds, but this would hardly suffice to overcome the doubts of QE sceptics. Moreover, the Greek and Cypriot central banks would no doubt oppose such a step as would the representatives of countries whose bonds are only just classified as investment grade (such as Portugal). Hence, this would rather reduce the majority within the ECB Council for QE, instead of unifying it. • Only bonds from countries not subject to excessive deficit procedure: One argument in favour of this option is that the countries in question would remain under pressure to consolidate their finances. It will not be likely to achieve a majority on the ECB Council, though. It is after all chiefly the heads of the central banks in those countries whose economies and public-sector budgets are in dire straits who are hoping for relief from QE. Moreover, the markets would be disappointed if this course were chosen, as it would be seen as a retreat from broad-based bond purchases. 16 January 2015 Economic Research | Week in Focus Government bond purchases in line with ECB capital key In allocating bond purchases to the various euro zone countries, the ECB will for legal reasons probably follow the ECB capital key. 5 For one thing, the German constitutional court in its judgement on OMT specifically criticised the fact that OMT purchases were selective. Allocation under QE should therefore be as fair and evenly distributed as possible. If the capital key were observed here, 26% of the purchase volume would be accounted for by German government bonds, 20% by French and 17% by Italian. In contrast, we see little chance of a weighting by market shares, as has allegedly also been discussed in the ECB Council. In this case, the ECB would buy even more government bonds of countries that have issued the most. In other words, a marked willingness to incur debts would be rewarded. The ECB could thus be accused of evading the ban on monetary state financing. Non-committal approach the best According to the press, the ECB is still undecided as to the scale of purchases and their time frame. We expect the bank to be vague in what it says at the press conference in order to be able to respond flexibly. It will probably just confirm its aim of expanding its balance sheet to the desired €3bn more rapidly via QE. To achieve this, it would have to acquire bonds to the tune of some €700bn. From the ECB's point of view, flexibility is crucial. It will enable the bank to regulate the volume of QE according to the success of the programmes already operating (TLTROs, ABS, covered bonds). And it can then react flexibly to surprise economic data, inflation expectations and the Fed's change of course which we envisage. Not only government bonds, but 'broad-based' The ECB will probably include in its purchase programme all paper broadly in line with ECB eligibility criteria, i.e. both government bonds and bonds issued by supranational organisations, local authorities and agencies, and above all corporate bonds. It is this very last category in particular that QE sceptics such as ECB Council member Hansson have constantly demanded. The ECB no doubt wants to indicate that it has not approved a programme of government bond purchases only, as far as this is possible. The ECB can be expected to acquire both floaters and index-linked bonds in order to avoid market distortions. We do not envisage purchases being limited to particular maturities in order not to restrict the potential volume of programme from the start. The bank will probably only exclude individual segments: The purchase of government bonds on the primary market contradicts the ban on monetary state financing, and that of foreign currency bonds would be a breach of the G7 agreement on unilateral currency manipulation. A number of Council members view the acquisition of unsecured bank bonds as problematic, since the ECB also exercises a supervisory function. Market implications: yield low not far off, euro depreciation In the US, most of the decline in yields occurred before the various QE programmes were officially announced by the Fed. We expect the same to happen with Bund yields, i.e. they have probably almost reached their lowest point. One important factor for yield premiums in the peripheral countries will no doubt be how a QE programme is accepted by the market when the central bank in question is buying bonds at its own risk. Will the response be positive because the resolution was passed by a large majority in the ECB Council? Or will disappointment prevail because the decision not to distribute potential losses will be seen as the disintegration of the euro zone? Given that there is still a high risk premium in the peripheral countries, though, we see yield spreads as more likely to fall. And the euro will continue to lose ground to the dollar, as an ECB decision in favour of QE would again emphasise that monetary policy in the US and in the euro zone is likely to diverge for some time. In addition, the pace of Fed rate hikes is probably still being underestimated by the market. 5 16 January 2015 " ECB QE: Allocation probably by capital key", Week in Focus, 10 October 2014. 5 Economic Research | Week in Focus Ashley Davies Tel. +65 6311 0166 China: CNY to strengthen in the second half of the year The CNY has depreciated against the US dollar since mid-November (chart 2). Contrary to the first quarter of 2014, the CNY was not deliberately pushed down by the Chinese central bank (PBoC), but the current weakness is rather due to the general significant USD strength. In the first half of 2015, the USD-CNY exchange rate is likely to remain stable, whereas later this year other factors will take over again – among them, the significant current account surplus – which will support a stronger CNY. In mid-February last year USD-CNY rose from around 6.06 to a high just shy of 6.26 in early May. Back then, the CNY was deliberately pushed weaker by the PBoC’s rapidly accumulation of FX reserves. The central bank also undermined the currency by steadily setting a higher USDCNY fixing and widening the currency trading bands on March 19, from 1% either side of the fixing to 2% either side. The motivation of the PBoC was to create two-way risk in the market and deter investors from endlessly speculating on a stronger currency. This time the weaker CNY seems to be primarily a function of US dollar strength, since it has continued to appreciate against most other currencies in contrast to a year ago (chart 3). In addition, some might speculate on monetary easing due to concerns about a significant slowdown of the economy. Such strong CNY moves are possible since the PBoC has been accepting stronger fluctuations since the widening of the trading band last March. Moreover, according to the words of PBoC Deputy Governor Yi Gang on 11 October 2014 at an IMF meeting, FX intervention by the PBoC was "basically" zero. Unlike in Q1 2014, though, the PBoC has kept a relatively steady USD-CNY fixing with even a slight downward trend. In the first half of the year, things will not change much. After all, the Fed is likely to raise interest rates in the near future, which will lead to a stronger dollar. Therefore, we revised our forecasts last week and now expect USD-CNY to remain at current high levels in the first half of the year. If USD-CNY rises further and challenges the upper trading band on a sustained basis, the PBoC may resort to a further widening in the bands, rather than tighten CNY liquidity and jeopardise the economy via higher interbank yields. In the second half of the year, though, after the Fed has started lifting interest rates, other factors are likely to take over again as the main drivers which in recent years have led to an appreciation trend for the CNY. An important factor is the significant Chinese current account surplus, which is expected to increase this year and next. In addition, China continues to benefit from considerable gains in productivity supporting the view of an appreciation trend in the CNY. Consequently, we target USD-CNY at 6.22 by June and 6.13 by end 2015. CHART 2:CNY has come close to the top of the bands CHART 3: CNY stronger against most currencies USD-CNY onshore spot versus trading bands CNY nominal, trade-weighted index (1 January 2014 = 100) st 106 6.70 6.60 104 6.50 102 6.40 6.30 100 6.20 98 6.10 6.00 2011 96 2012 2013 USD-CNY spot Source: Bloomberg, Commerzbank Research 6 2014 2015 Trading range 94 Feb-13 Aug-13 Feb-14 Aug-14 Source: Bloomberg, Commerzbank Research 16 January 2015 Economic Research | Week in Focus Eugen Weinberg Tel. +49 69 136 43417 Oil price: An end to the horror The massive price slide on the oil market is largely attributable to a change in policy by some OPEC countries. Unlike in earlier similar situations, these countries do not want to halt the slump in prices by reducing production. Instead, they are probably hoping that the lower price will end the boom in unconventional oil production in North America. Against this backdrop, the oil price should continue to drop further initially and not hit bottom before levels around 40 USD per barrel. However, in the second half of the year, the OPEC strategy can be expected to take effect. The price of oil should then pick up again, on the back of lower supply, and top 70 USD per barrel on a sustainable basis by the end of the year. In the past few weeks, the price slide on the oil market has accelerated. Since the beginning of the year, the price of a barrel of Brent has dropped by a further 20% to 45 USD per barrel, which implies a fall of 60% since June. The main reason for the huge price slide was not weak demand, however, as in most earlier oil price slumps, but rather oversupply; OPEC has abandoned its role of “price regulator” and is presently focusing instead on defending its market shares. So far, this change of strategy has not paid off; neither production nor demand have reacted noticeably to the lower oil price. Even so, OPEC is likely to maintain its strategy of “an end to the horror is better than a horror without end“. Furthermore, since according to the CFTC most financial investors are still betting on rising oil prices, i.e. are as “bullish” as in September 2014, when the oil price was trading at around 100 USD per barrel, a necessary adjustment is still due (chart 5). The price should therefore retreat further in the near term. That said, we expect a clear recovery in the second half of the year. Unlike the US Energy Information Administration, which predicts in its latest outlook for 2015 that daily US crude oil production will rise by almost 700,000 barrels and again by a further 300,000 barrels in 2016, we expect a significant fall in US oil production in the second half of this year. After all, unlike conventional oil production, shale oil deposits are quickly exhausted. In only twelve months, production falls by up to 70% of its initial peak. This makes “rolling” investments necessary just to keep production levels stable. Even if the bulk of current oil production in North America should be profitable despite lower oil prices, new investment is set to decrease considerably. The first signs of this are already evident. The number of active oil rigs in the US has fallen as sharply as seen in 1991. What’s more, there are already several struggling oil producers in the USA which are close to collapse. CHART 4: Strong rise of US oil production CHART 5: Investors still betting on rising prices Oil production, in million barrels per day Speculative net-long positions, in thousand contracts; oil price: price per barrel of Brent in US dollars 5.0 9.5 250 4.0 8.5 200 7.5 3.0 130 120 110 100 150 90 6.5 100 2.0 1.0 0.0 1986 80 5.5 4.5 3.5 1990 1994 North Dakota, lS 1998 2002 2006 Texas, lS Source: EIA; Bloomberg, Commerzbank Research 16 January 2015 2010 2014 USA, rS 70 50 60 0 2012 50 2013 2014 Spec.net long pos.(LHS) 2015 Oil price (RHS) Source: CFTC; Bloomberg, Commerzbank Research 7 Economic Research | Week in Focus Product idea: Knock-into forward EUR-NOK Eugen Weinberg Tel. +49 69 136 43417 Locking in the attractive price level in diesel In the wake of much lower oil prices, diesel has also cheapened noticeably. Whereas in the near future oil prices will likely continue falling, we forecast a significant rise in the second half of the year. Over the coming months, supplies should decline, causing both the oil price and the diesel price to rise again. In addition to this is the expected depreciation of the euro, which would additionally drive up prices in euro terms. For this reason we recommend a long-term hedge for diesel prices at the attractive current levels. Over the last six months, the massive fall in oil prices has nearly halved the European diesel price from around €700 to €380 per tonne at present. This drop in oil prices is primarily attributable to a change in OPEC’s strategy, which currently does not aim at stable prices but at crowding out competition from shale oil production in the US. We assume that oil prices will fall somewhat further in the near-term. But in the second half of the year, oil production in the US will decline markedly due to the oil price fall, with the current oversupply disappearing, and so prices will then probably rise markedly (see page 5). Moreover, the OPEC countries still need much higher oil prices on a long-term perspective to finance their public budgets. For this reason they will probably return to their former strategy of price controls in the long run. We expect that by the end of the year oil prices will have risen from the current level of USD 45 to more than USD 70 per barrel. Furthermore, the price decline should revive worldwide diesel demand, while supply – especially in the US, the world’s biggest diesel exporter at present – will probably decline due to the lower production of crude oil. We forecast diesel prices to rise from USD 460 currently to USD 700 per tonne – i.e. some 50% – by year-end. Simultaneously, the EUR-USD exchange rate should fall to 1.12. Accordingly, the diesel price in euro terms should rise more strongly (to €625 per tonne). For this reason we recommend a long-term hedge for diesel prices at their attractive current levels. Forward Extra on diesel – Zero-cost hedge for raw material purchasers Reference price: Diesel oil 10ppm FOB Barges ARA in EUR, Platts (AAJUS00, corr. to DIN EN 590), €/$ conversion at 4:30 p.m. Ldn. time Maturity: 01.07.2015 – 30.06.2016 Reference quantity: 75 mT per month, 1,200 mT in total Strike price: EUR 470.00 per tonne Participation limit: EUR 660.00 per tonne Comparable fixed price: Client pays EUR 447.00 per tonne Prices will be averaged over all raw materials business days in the respective period, with monthly payment based on the agreed reference quantity. If the variable price for a period exceeds the strike price without reaching or exceeding the participation limit, the client will receive a compensation payment in the amount of twice the difference between the variable price and the strike price. If the variable price exceeds the strike price and reaches or exceeds the participation limit, the client will receive the single difference between the variable price and the strike price. If the variable price is fixed below the strike price, the client will pay the single difference between the strike price and the variable price. In addition to diesel, Commerzbank AG also offers hedging instruments in the energy sector on WTI and Brent as well as further middle distillates, coal, electricity and CO2 8 16 January 2015 Economic Research | Week in Focus Major publications from 9 – 15 January 2015 Economic Briefing: ECJ on OMT – carte blanche for the ECB, but BVG has the final say The Advocate-General of the European Court of Justice has today practically given the ECB a carte blanche for its OMT asset purchase programme. In his – legally non-binding – statements, he declared that OMT is fundamentally compatible with EU law, the ECB merely has to meet several conditions. The legal dispute thus continues, as the BVG (German Federal Constitutional Court) has reserved itself the right to the final say even against the opinion of the ECJ. Quite a lot of time will pass though until such a decision is taken. Today’s statements should not have any impact on the ECB’s decision on QE, which we expect next Thursday. more Economic Insight: ECB ignores Japan’s experience Whenever ECB President Draghi gives hints of broad-based purchases of government bonds, there is an implied warning that without bond purchases the euro zone could slide into deflation – as Japan did. But the last 25 years have taught us that Japan’s problem was not a slight decline in consumer prices at all, but so-called ‘zombification’. more Economic Insight: What is now changing on the German labour market The introduction of a minimum wage, general applicability of collective agreements and limitations on working time accounts suggest that much has changed on the German labour market at the start of this year, and we are also likely to see restrictions on temporary employment. We show that these changes, combined with the regular wage increases, will probably drive German companies‘ labour costs up by more than 4% this year. The German economy’s competitiveness is eroding, and in the long run this cannot be masked by the ECB’s lax monetary policy. But it is government bonds from peripheral countries that will benefit because competitive pressure on them will ease as German labour costs rise considerably. more EM Briefing: India – RBI cuts on inflation drop; more to come The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) surprised with an unscheduled 25bp cut in the repo rate to 7.75%. This is due to the steady decline in inflation over the past six months owing to 1) weak demand conditions; 2) lower food and vegetable prices; and 3) the sharp collapse in oil prices. In the December statement, RBI alluded to the possibility of a cut in early 2015 if the positive development in inflation continued. Today’s cut was viewed as a fulfilment of that commitment. RBI expects oil prices to remain low this year, barring any geo-political shock. With inflation to remain well below RBI’s target of 6% by January 2016, we expect RBI to lower rates by another 75-100bp this year. On FX, we expect RBI to favour stability with USD-INR at 62 at end-2015. We see GDP growth at 5.8% for FY2014-2015 and 6.2% for FY2015-16. more FX Hotspot: ARPI² update – Uncertainty declined somewhat Compared to last week, the ARPI² fell 0.2 index points. In particular, emerging-market, FX and money-market risks declined somewhat. This was probably a counter-movement, as global risk perception had increased markedly in the weeks before. more Cross Asset Outlook Update – Time to lock in some of the gains Strong and lasting relative trends tend to be rare during mid-cycles. In addition, the return/risk relationship has deteriorated for most of our successful positions. Against this backdrop we halve the commodity underweight and lock in some gains for commodity-related positions in equities. With €-QE speculations expected to come to an end for the being in the near future we reduce our equity overweight and are now neutrally positioned among European and US sovereign bonds. more 16 January 2015 9 Economic Research | Week in Focus Preview – The week of 19 to 23 January 2015 Time Region Indicator Period Forecast Survey Last Monday, 19 January 2015 No relevant data is due for release. Tuesday, 20 January 2015 • 2:00 CHN 10:00 15:00 GER USA Industrial production GDP ZEW Index NAHB Index Dec Q4 Jan Jan yoy yoy 7.0 7.0 50.0 58 7.4 7.2 39.0 58 7.2 7.3 34.9 57 mom, k, sa yoy %, sa SAAR, k SAAR, k % -25.0 1.7 6.0 1040 1050 1.00 -25.0 1.7 5.9 1040 1054 1.00 -26.9 1.4 6.0 1028 1052 1.00 sa % k, sa -10.0 0.05 300 -10.5 0.05 – -10.9 0.05 316 99.0 48.0 50.0 52.0 52.5 51.0 52.0 0.2 4.2 -6.1 5.10 – – – 51.6 52.4 51.0 52.0 – – – 5.08 99.0 47.5 50.6 51.2 52.1 50.6 51.6 1.7 6.9 -6.9 4.93 sa Wednesday, 21 January 2015 9:30 GBR Claimant count change Dec Wages (three-month average) Nov Unemployment rate (ILO) Nov 13:30 USA Housing starts Dec Housing permits Dec CAD BoC interest rate decision WEF: World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos (21 to 24 January) Thursday, 22 January 2015 11:00 EUR Consumer confidence Jan ECB interest rate decision 13:30 USA Initial claims 17 Jan • ECB set to announce QE programme during press conference (13:30) Friday, 23 January 2015 • 7:45 8:00 FRA 8:30 GER 9:00 EUR 9:30 GBR Business climate (Insee) PMI, manufacturing PMI, services PMI, manufacturing PMI, services PMI, manufacturing PMI, services Retail sales 14:00 BEL Business confidence 15:00 USA Existing home sales EUR: ECB releases Survey of Professional Forecasters Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan Dec Jan Dec sa sa sa sa sa sa sa mom, sa yoy sa SAAR, mn Source: Bloomberg. Commerzbank Economic Research; *Time GMT (subtract 5 hours for EST. add 1 hour for CET). # = Possible release; mom/qoq/yoy: change to previous period in percent. AR = annual rate. sa = seasonal adjusted. wda = working days adjusted; • = data of highest importance for markets 10 16 January 2015 Economic Research | Week in Focus Dr Ralph Solveen Tel. +49 69 136 22322 Economic data preview: Euro zone: Sentiment brightens further Sentiment indicators in the euro zone should continue to climb next week overall. The ZEW will probably show the greatest gain, though more important would be a further rise in purchasing managers’ indices, as we expect, confirming the turnaround that appears to be on the horizon. Factors pointing in this direction are the much lower oil price and the weaker euro, which should both give a tailwind to companies in the euro zone. In the USA, construction should have been strong in December, with the relatively mild weather presumably helping as well. For analysts, one thing is clear: cheaper oil and the weaker euro will give some stimulus at least to the economy in Germany and the euro zone. In January, the responses to the Sentix survey on the German economy were much better again than in December. We consequently also expect the ZEW index to rise sharply again in January from 34.9 to 50.0 (consensus: 39.0; see chart 6). Of course, it would be more important if the better economic environment, shown also by our Early Bird, would be reflected in stronger corporate business activity. As is usually the case with an Early Bird that has been pointing upwards since the beginning of 2014, the Ifo business climate appears to have already turned the corner, picking up in November and December. Less clear were the signals recently from the purchasing managers’ indices for manufacturing. While these have stabilised in both Germany and the euro zone, there can be no talk of a turnaround yet. Even so, we expect the German index to climb from 51.2 to 52.0 (consensus: 51.6; chart 7). For the euro zone, the rise should be slightly less, from 50.6 to 51.0 (consensus: 51.0). The signs therefore point to economic recovery, though this would not be a signal of a strong upswing. USA: Improvement in construction In a week with unusually little US data, the main focus will be on housing starts and existing home sales in December. The mild weather is likely to have supported construction activity. We expect housing starts to rise to 1040k (consensus 1040k). For existing home sales, the first regional data are pointing upwards. We therefore also expect a slight rise to 5.1 million (consensus 5.08 million). All in all, construction is likely to have picked up in the fourth quarter by an annualised growth rate of 6% on the previous quarter. CHART 6:Germany – analysts more optimistic again CHART 7: Germany – PMI lags behind Ifo somewhat Sentix: Subcomponent of Sentix Index for institutional investors in Germany; ZEW economic expectations Ifo business climate for manufacturing; purchasing managers’ index for industry (PMI) 50 100 25 50 0 0 65 115 60 110 55 105 50 -25 -50 100 45 -50 2009 -100 2010 2011 2012 Sentix (lhs) Source: Bloomberg, Commerzbank Research 16 January 2015 2013 2014 ZEW (rhs) 40 95 2011 2012 PMI (rhs) 2013 2014 ifo business climate (rhs) Source: Global Insight, Commerzbank Research 11 Economic Research | Week in Focus Central Bank Watch (1) Fed With the labour market on a stable growth course, the attention of the markets and Fed members has turned more to inflation. The huge slide of oil prices will push the inflation rate down towards zero in the first half of 2015. While the Fed has repeatedly said that such effects that are regarded as temporary will not unduly influence monetary policy, the falling inflation rate and surprisingly weak pay growth recently have led to a reassessment of monetary policy by the financial markets. Fed funds futures are not now pricing in an interest rate hike until October. The significant fall in long-term interest rates is increasingly causing headaches for the Fed. According to Narayana Kocherlakota (Minneapolis Fed president), this suggests that the supply of safe investment options is too small for investors. US yields could therefore also remain very low in the long term. This in turn could make it difficult for the Fed to exit loose monetary policy, as rate hikes are likely to have a much weaker impact on long-term interests in such an environment. This constellation has already led to problems in the past; continued lower yields after the start of rate hikes in 2004 helped to drive the search for yield, with obvious implications for financial market stability. Bernd Weidensteiner +49 69 136 24527 CHART 8: Expected interest rate for 3-month funds (USD) 2,5 2,0 1,5 1,0 0,5 0,0 current Mrz 15 Jun 15 Sep 15 Dez 15 Mrz 16 Futures 16.01.15 09.01.15 Commerzbank TABLE 1: Consensus forecasts Fed funds rate Q1 15 Q2 15 Q4 15 Consensus 0.25 0.25 1.00 High 0.50 0.75 1.75 Low 0.25 0.25 0.25 Commerzbank 0.25 0.50 1.50 Source: Bloomberg, Commerzbank Research ECB Quite a few ECB Council members signalled that a QE announcement is not far away: ECB Executive Board member Coeuré said that “in any case, we will be able to take a decision on 22 January.” He warned that “the continuous decline in oil prices increases the danger that people will lose confidence in our inflation objective”. "[The Greek elections] have no influence on us whatsoever," he said. The risk of deflation in the euro zone should not be underestimated and the best way for the ECB to deal with the problem is buying government bonds, ECB’s Visco said. The ECB should act sooner rather than later to address the euro zone’s low inflation rates, ECB’s Nowotny said. ECB’s Vasiliauskas said that in his view there is a “strong consensus” within the Council about further measures. At the same time, some QE critics repeated their concerns, too: ECB Executive Board member Sabine Lautenschläger confirmed her opposition to government bond purchases. She argued that in light of already low interest rates government purchases would boost credit provision in the euro area and warned that it could seduce governments to further increase debt levels. ECB’s Hansson said that announcing a purchase programme including Greek bonds in January was “problematic”. Dr Michael Schubert +49 69 136 23700 12 CHART 9: Expected interest rate for 3-month funds (EUR) 1,0 0,8 0,6 0,4 0,2 0,0 current Mrz 15 Futures Jun 15 16.01.15 Sep 15 09.01.15 Dez 15 Mrz 16 Commerzbank TABLE 2: Consensus forecasts ECB minimum bid rate Q1 15 Q2 15 Q4 15 Consensus 0.05 0.05 0.05 High 0.05 0.05 0.05 Low 0.05 0.05 0.05 Commerzbank 0.05 0.05 0.05 Source: Reuters, Bloomberg, Commerzbank Research 16 January 2015 Economic Research | Week in Focus Central Bank Watch (2) Bank of England (BoE) The unexpectedly sharp slowdown in inflation in December, which posted a rate of 0.5% – the lowest since 1960 – has changed the nature of the policy debate. Although Governor Carney suggested that the BoE has “the ability to bring inflation back to target” the UK in reality is being affected by external factors over which it has no control. Following comments by Mr Carney suggesting that inflation could slow further in the near-term, markets have now priced out the prospect of a rate hike this year. Indeed, the debate amongst MPC members is set to turn interesting. The December figures would have been made available to the MPC ahead of the January vote, and in our view the position of the two dissenters who have been pushing for a 25 bps rate rise now looks untenable. Messrs McCafferty and Weale have argued that labour market slack is limited, which may trigger a rapid pickup in wage inflation. We have a different view. For one thing, the unemployment rate does not accurately reflect the margin of spare capacity due to various structural changes. Moreover, weak inflation ought to act as a brake on nominal wage gains. Thus, one or both of them are likely to change their view in the coming months. We will get some more insight with the release of the January minutes next week. CHART 10: Expected interest rate for 3-month funds (GBP) 2,0 1,5 1,0 0,5 0,0 current Mrz 15 Jun 15 Sep 15 Dez 15 Mrz 16 Futures 16.01.15 09.01.15 Commerzbank Source: Bloomberg, Commerzbank Research Peter Dixon +44 20 7475 4806 Bank of Canada The cautious optimism signalled by the Bank of Canada in early December about a broader economic recovery has vanished amid the huge oil price slump. Governor Poloz established only a little later that the lower oil price will probably dampen growth by 0.3 percentage points in 2015. For the first time in quite a while, there is speculation on the markets about a rate cut by the BOC, which has kept the key interest rate at 1% for a good four years now. In the run-up to the BoC meeting next week, deputy governor Lane spoke last Tuesday about the economic impact of the lower oil price, which would be outlined in more detail in the new monetary policy report. While the global economy was profiting, the overall effect for Canada was likely to be negative. This was because the positive effects of higher export demand, improved purchasing power of consumers or more favourable price competitiveness of Canadian firms following CAD depreciation were probably not enough to offset the negative effects on corporate investment in the oil sector, the labour market and income resulting from the poorer relationship between export and import prices. We expect the BoC to adjust its forecasts downwards and look ready to act. It should keep the key interest rate at 1%. CHART 11: Expected interest rate for 3-month funds (CAD) 2,0 1,8 1,6 1,4 1,2 1,0 current Mrz 15 Jun 15 Futures 16.01.15 Sep 15 09.01.15 Dez 15 Mrz 16 Commerzbank Source: Bloomberg, Commerzbank Research Elisabeth Andreae +49 69 136 24052 16 January 2015 13 Economic Research | Week in Focus Rainer Guntermann Tel. +49 69 136 87506 Bond market preview: Decisive events ahead! The coming ten days will see two landmark events, the ECB meeting and the parliamentary election in Greece. The market is convinced that the ECB will announce a purchase programme for government bonds. The details will decide how quickly Bund yields fall to new lows. We expect to see new yield lows also because tailwinds from globally falling inflation expectations appear to be intensifying. Although ECB purchases will be positive for bonds from peripheral countries on a medium-term perspective, we remain cautious near-term. Uncertainty about the outcome of the Greek election and bold issuance activity should initially stand in the way of a marked decline in yield premiums. TABLE 3: Weekly outlook for yields and curves Bunds US Treasuries Yield (10 years) Lower Lower Curve (2 - 10 years) Flatter Flatter Source: Commerzbank Research Outlook for the Bund future, 19 – 25 January Economy ↓ Inflation ↑ Monetary policy ↑ Trend ↑ Supply ↓ Risk aversion ↑ Bunds remain in demand, and their ten-year yields have fallen to nearly 0.40%. One reason for this drop is speculation about an imminent programme for government bond purchases by the ECB, which has been fanned by numerous official comments (see page 3). Also, uncertainty about the outcome of the election in Greece has fuelled risk aversion. Whilst the Swiss National Bank, having abandoned the exchange rate floor, will no longer be a buyer of German or French government bonds in the near future, concerns about the global decline in inflation are simultaneously mounting. Against this backdrop, the markets are obviously increasingly doubtful that the Fed can continue to “look through” the plunge in the oil price and the resulting fall in the inflation rate and initiate the reversal of interest rates in the middle of this year. As a consequence, ten-year US Treasuries have outperformed Bunds by 30 basis points in yield terms since the start of the year (chart 12). The 30-year US Treasury yield has traded below 2.44%, which was hitherto considered a floor even during the financial crisis, and for a time pushed the yield of 30-year Bunds below the level of their Japanese counterparts (chart 13). The ECB’s decision to buy government bonds will be a landmark event for the European bond market next week. We assume that ECB President Draghi will remain ambiguous for now, especially with regard to the pace and total volume of the purchases. As a result, this decision will unfold its full effect on the market only gradually over time. As soon as bond markets in the US return to normal and again take rising interest rate expectations into account, Bund yields should also touch bottom. But near-term, the global situation argues for new yield lows in Bunds, possibly below 0.30%. CHART 12: US yields falling more steeply than Bund yields CHART 13: Yields of 30-year bonds enter uncharted territory Yield spread between ten-year Bunds and US Treasuries, in basis points Yields of 30-year government bonds, in percent 170 6 160 5 150 4 140 3 130 120 2 110 1 100 0 2007 90 Jan-14 Mar-14 May-14 Jul-14 Sep-14 Nov-14 Jan-15 Source: Bloomberg, Commerzbank Research 14 2009 Japan 2011 Germany 2013 2015 USA Source: Bloomberg, Commerzbank Research 16 January 2015 Economic Research | Week in Focus Esther Reichelt Tel. +49 69 136 41505 Antje Praefcke Tel. +49 69 136 43834 FX market preview: The beginning of a new era The Swiss National Bank (SNB) has surprisingly abandoned its policy of a minimum EURCHF rate, so that the outlook for the Swiss franc now looks very different. We have therefore changed our forecast for EUR-CHF, as well as that for the euro versus the Czech koruna. TABLE 4: Trading ranges expected next week Range EUR-USD Tendency Range 1.1300-1.2000 EUR-GBP 0.7500-0.7950 EUR-JPY 132.00-140.00 GBP-USD 1.4900-1.5400 USD-JPY 113.00-120.00 EUR-CHF 0.9500-1.0800 Tendency Source: Commerzbank Research The announcement expected next week of government bond purchases by the ECB (see page 3) is unlikely to have much impact on the euro. Now that a target has been set for the ECB’s balance sheet total, the foreign exchange market has already braced itself for extensive measures. From its point of view, the volume of additional liquidity is more important than precisely how it is supplied to the market (chart 15). On the other hand, the ECB’s forthcoming decision naturally had a profound impact on the Swiss franc. This was probably a reason for the SNB’s decision to stop defending a minimum rate for EUR-CHF (chart 14). After all, further massive interventions would be needed once the ECB starts buying government bonds. For the foreseeable future, the exchange rate will be determined by the general weakness of the euro resulting from the ECB’s policy and the safe haven character of the Swiss franc. The Swiss franc should rise further as a result. We have therefore adjusted our CHF forecast in line with the new situation and now expect EUR-CHF at 0.98 by the end of this year (previously: 1.21). We have also revised our EUR-CZK forecasts. In light of surprisingly low inflation figures and significantly cheaper commodities, the Czech central bank (CNB) has revised its inflation forecasts downwards. Since the key interest rate is already virtually zero (0.05%), inflation can only be lifted by a weaker koruna. The monetary policy committee so far has not agreed on a raising of the lower limit for EUR-CZK, which currently stands at 27.00. However, in the coming quarters EUR-CZK is likely to settle at a higher level of around 29.00 in any case, for the simple reason that only this level is consistent with the CNB’s inflation target. And if the market does not weaken CZK, the CNB will eventually do it by raising the lower limit. Therefore, CZK will be weakened either passively by market forces or actively by the CNB. CHART 14: SNB abandons minimum exchange rate EUR-CHF 10-minute spot rate on 15 January 2015 CHART 15: Balance sheet target determines liquidity supply ECB balance sheet total in billions of euros 3500 1.2000 1.1500 3000 1.1000 2500 1.0500 1.0000 2000 0.9500 1500 0.9000 0.8500 1000 2011 0.8000 0:00 2:00 4:00 6:00 8:00 Source: Bloomberg, Commerzbank Research 16 January 2015 10:00 12:00 14:00 2012 total assets 2013 2014 2015 assumed balance sheet target Source: ECB, Commerzbank Research 15 Economic Research | Week in Focus Andreas Hürkamp Tel. +49 69 136 45925 Equity Market preview: DAX outperformance due to weak euro and falling oil price The earnings of European equity markets are suffering from the falling oil price, and earnings of US equity markets suffer from the falling oil price and the strong US dollar. The DAX, by contrast, has a relatively low exposure to the tumbling commodity markets, and the index is a winner from the weakening euro. In our scenario the DAX should continue its recent outperformance against the Euro Stoxx 50 and the S&P 500. TABLE 5: Equity Market with subdued start to 2015 Earnings 2015e Performance (%) since Index points Growth (%) P/E 2015e Index 31/12 30/09 30/06 current 31/12 current 31/12 current 31/12 DAX 30 9,817 0.1 3.6 -0.2 777.5 779.7 10.1 10.2 12.6 12.6 MDAX 17,265 2.0 7.9 2.7 1052 1053 13.9 13.9 16.4 16.1 Euro Stoxx 50 3,090 -1.8 -4.2 -4.3 241.4 242.2 9.5 9.9 12.8 13.0 S&P 500 2,011 -2.3 2.0 2.6 124.1 124.7 7.2 7.6 16.2 16.5 Source: Commerzbank Corporates & Markets, I/B/E/S Over the last quarter, 2015 earnings expectations for the MDAX were flat, and the DAX had slight negative earnings revisions of minus 1.1%. For the S&P 500, by contrast, earnings expectations have fallen by 3.5%, for the Euro Stoxx 50 by 4.0% and for the Stoxx 600 by 5.1%. Both the DAX and the MDAX enjoy two relative tailwinds compared to the other indices: • Firstly, the DAX and the MDAX benefit from their low exposure to the falling oil price. For the European Stoxx Oil & Gas, for example, the expected EPS 2015 has tumbled by 20% over the last weeks. Within the Euro Stoxx 50, Eni suffered an EPS 2015 cut of 34% over the last quarter, Repsol by 24% and Total by 23%. And in the US, the Dow Jones index suffered from EPS 2015 earnings cuts of 37% for Chevron and 31% for Exxon. • Secondly, the DAX and the MDAX clearly benefit from the strong depreciation of the euro the euro has already weakened by 14% y-o-y against the US dollar, by 11% against the Renminbi and by 6% against the British pound. Thanks to the weak euro German exports to the US have risen by 8% y-o-y to €95bn over the last year, to the UK by 11% to €82bn and to China by 12% to €74bn - three all-time-highs (chart 16). As a consequence, the 12-month EPS trend of the DAX price index has started to outperform the 12-month EPS trend of the Euro Stoxx 50 (chart 17). Therefore the recent outperformance of the DAX (2015 target price 10,800) should continue against the Euro Stoxx 50 (target price 3,200) and the S&P 500 (target price 2,100), in our optimistic DAX view. CHART 16: Record-high exports to US, UK, China German exports over the last year in €bn CHART 17: DAX earnings trend has started to outperform DAX price index, Euro Stoxx 50: 12-month EPS trend, indexed 106 100 104 80 102 60 100 40 98 96 20 0 2001 94 2003 2005 US 2007 2009 UK Source: Datastream, Commerzbank Research 16 2011 China 2013 92 Jul-12 Jan-13 Jul-13 DAX price index Jan-14 Jul-14 Jan-15 Euro Stoxx 50 Source: Factset, Commerzbank Research 16 January 2015 Economic Research | Week in Focus Barbara Lambrecht Tel. +49 69 136 22295 Commodities market preview: Drop in base metal prices excessive The latest rally on the oil market is unlikely to last. On the contrary the large number of net long positions held by speculative investors suggests that prices have not yet reached their lowest point. However, the sharp dip in base metal prices is probably exaggerated. Sound economic data from China and tight market balances could trigger a counter-movement starting next week. Gold should benefit next week from the ECB announcing a QE programme. TABLE 6: Trends in important commodities Per cent change Tendency Commodity specific events 15Jan 1 week 1 month 1 year Short-term Brent (USD per barrel) 46.2 -3.8 -19.8 -54.3 Copper (USD per ton) 5645 -7.5 -11.8 -23.2 1253 3.7 5.0 0.9 ILZSG: 19. ; WBMS: 21. Gold (USD per troy ounce) Source: Bloomberg, Commerzbank Research At just under $45 per barrel in mid-week, Brent has been at its cheapest level for six years, but has since gained an unexpected $3. However, we do not see this as the end of oil's slide. The repeated surge in US crude inventories is clear proof of a rising market surplus. Moreover, speculators remain very optimistically positioned. However, there are some first signs of the shale oil boom slowing down. The number of active oil rigs is already falling (see chart 18). The number of rigs in the US reported each Friday by Baker Hughes is likely to shrink further in the weeks ahead, supporting the price recovery we envisage as of the spring. As the surplus on the oil market should decline in the medium term, prices should manage to stage a good comeback in the second half of the year. Most base metals have been pulled down by oil. Copper has lost almost 12% since the start of the year, zinc and nickel roughly 7%. At $5,500 per tonne, copper is at its cheapest since summer 2009 (chart 19). In contrast with the oil market, though, the low of the economic and financial crisis of just over $3,000 is still a long way off. There is no apparent basic explanation for the latest dip in prices. Admittedly, the combination of a strong dollar, greater risk aversion and concerns about the Chinese economic slowdown, the world's number one consumer of metals, is having an adverse impact on prices. However, in our view the severe losses of the last few days are excessive. China’s economic growth, industrial output and the preliminary PMI Index from HSBC due out next week should calm the pessimists. In addition, the latest fundamentals from study groups and the World Bureau of Metal Statistics will continue to reveal a slight supply shortfall. Prices should therefore soon start to pick up again. CHART 18:: USA – oil output still rising, number of rigs already falling CHART 19: Nosedive on copper market 000 USD per tonne Active rig count, mill. barrels per day 2000 1600 10 11 9 10 8 9 1200 7 800 6 5 400 0 2008 4 2009 2010 2011 US oil rig count, l 2012 2013 US crude oil production, r Source: EIA, Baker Hughes, Commerzbank Research 16 January 2015 2014 3 2015 8 7 6 5 4 3 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Source: LME, Bloomberg, Commerzbank Research 17 Economic Research | Week in Focus Commerzbank forecasts TABLE 7: Growth and inflation Real GDP (%) Inflation rate (%) 2014 2015 2016 2014 2015 2016 USA Canada 2.4 2.9 2.8 1.6 0.2 2.0 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.0 1.0 2.0 Japan 0.3 1.0 1.5 2.7 0.7 0.7 Euro area 0.8 0.8 1.0 0.4 -0.1 1.2 - Germany 1.5 1.1 1.5 0.9 0.7 2.4 - France 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.5 -0.1 0.7 0.7 - Italy -0.3 0.1 0.5 0.2 -0.4 - Spain 1.4 2.3 2.3 -0.1 -0.7 0.5 - Portugal 1.0 1.5 2.0 -0.4 -0.9 0.5 - Ireland 5.2 3.5 3.5 0.4 0.3 1.4 - Greece 1.0 2.0 2.5 -1.2 -1.5 0.0 1.6 United Kingdom 2.6 2.4 2.4 1.5 0.8 Switzerland 1.9 1.3 1.3 0.0 -1.5 0.0 China 7.3 6.5 6.5 2.3 2.0 2.0 India 5.8 6.2 6.2 6.5 6.2 6.0 Brazil 0.3 0.9 2.3 6.3 6.5 6.0 Russia 0.6 -3.7 1.6 7.8 11.3 7.2 World 3.1 3.2 3.5 • The ultra-expansionary Fed policy is boosting the US economy. At the same time, fiscal policy is at least no longer a headwind. We expect US growth to markedly accelerate. • Growth in China is decelerating on decreasing house prices and gradual policy adjustment. • The recovery in the euro zone will only continue at a slow pace. GDP growth will remain markedly lower than that of the USA. • EMU has survived the sovereign debt crisis, but is gradually evolving into an “Italian-style monetary union”. • Despite its current weakness, the German economy looks set to continue outperforming the rest of the euro area – partly because ECB target rates are much too low for Germany. • High unemployment in most countries is keeping inflation low for the time being. In the long term, however, inflation is likely to rise, as central banks have given up some of their independence. • We cut our GDP forecast for Russia on lower oil prices and continued sanctions. TABLE 8: Interest rates (end-of-quarter) 15.01.2015 Q1 15 Q2 15 Q3 15 Q4 15 Q1 16 Federal funds rate 0.25 0.25 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 3-months Libor 0.25 0.30 0.75 1.25 1.75 2.15 2 years* 0.47 0.90 1.30 1.80 2.25 2.65 5 years* 1.28 2.20 2.60 2.90 3.10 3.30 10 years* 1.81 2.50 2.75 2.90 3.05 3.20 Spread 10-2 years 134 160 145 110 80 55 Swap-Spread 10 years 12 10 10 15 15 15 USA Euro area Minimum bid rate 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 3-months Euribor 0.07 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 2 years* -0.15 -0.10 -0.10 -0.05 -0.05 -0.05 5 years* -0.05 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.20 0.20 10 years* 0.48 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 Spread 10-2 years 62 80 90 95 105 115 Swap-Spread 10 years 30 25 30 35 35 35 United Kingdom Bank Rate 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.75 0.75 3-months Libor 0.56 0.60 0.60 0.80 0.85 1.00 2 years* 0.40 0.65 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.35 10 years* 1.53 2.30 2.50 2.70 2.70 2.80 • Fed interest rate hikes are on the cards from 2015Q2, due to a continuously decreasing US unemployment rate and the expectation that inflation will gradually rise once the oil price has stabilised. • Since the Eurosystem balance sheet will probably not expand as expected by the central bank, and as inflation expectations are likely to fall further, we expect the ECB to announce broad-based government bond purchases during the first half of 2015. • 10y Bund yields are likely to stabilise around 1% later this year when the Fed communication changes but mark new record lows when the ECB announces QE in 2015. Thereafter, yields should rise gradually. The structurally low interest rate environment remains intact. • The focus on the Fed’s lift-off will put upward pressure on US$ rates. A return to 3% for 10y USTs is only on the cards for end-2015, though. The curve is in for a textbook-style flattening via the short-end in the coming quarters. • Risk premiums of peripheral government bonds are set to decline further. TABLE 9: Exchange rates (end-of-quarter) 15.01.2015 Q1 15 Q2 15 Q3 15 Q4 15 Q1 16 EUR/USD 1.16 1.16 1.14 1.12 1.12 1.11 USD/JPY 117 117 120 122 125 127 EUR/CHF 1.05 1.01 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.97 EUR/GBP 0.76 0.78 0.77 0.76 0.77 0.77 EUR/SEK 9.41 9.20 9.10 9.00 9.10 9.15 EUR/NOK 8.87 9.50 9.60 9.40 9.30 9.20 EUR/PLN 4.30 4.35 4.35 4.35 4.30 4.30 EUR/HUF 322 310 315 317 317 318 EUR/CZK 27.93 28.50 29.00 29.00 29.00 29.00 AUD/USD 0.82 0.82 0.81 0.79 0.77 0.78 NZD/USD 0.78 0.75 0.73 0.71 0.70 0.69 USD/CAD 1.19 1.19 1.21 1.20 1.19 1.19 USD/CNY 6.19 6.22 6.22 6.17 6.13 6.08 • USD should further profit from expectations of Fed interest rate normalization. Current USD rates have not priced in the speed of rate hikes that we expect. • The discussion about an ECB QE programme will not put much pressure on the euro for the time being because the overall volume of ECB liquidity measures is already known. • CEE currencies are benefiting from a dovish ECB backdrop, meaning central banks have room to cut rates further. HUF remains the more vulnerable currency, while PLN and RON trade range-bound, and EUR/CZK continues to float above the 27.0 floor set by the CNB. • We see the PBoC “allowing” the CNY to remain on the weaker side in H1, following its rate cuts to support the economy. Source: Bloomberg. Commerzbank Economic Research; bold change on last week; * Treasuries, Bunds, Gilts, JGBs 18 16 January 2015 Economic Research | Week in Focus Research contacts (E-Mail: firstname.surname@commerzbank.com) Chief Economist Dr Jörg Krämer +49 69 136 23650 Economic Research Interest Rate & Credit Research FX Strategy Commodity Research Dr Jörg Krämer (Head) +49 69 136 23650 Christoph Rieger (Head) +49 69 136 87664 Ulrich Leuchtmann (Head) +49 69 136 23393 Eugen Weinberg (Head) +49 69 136 43417 Dr Ralph Solveen (Deputy Head; Germany) +49 69 136 22322 Alexander Aldinger +49 69 136 89004 Lutz Karpowitz +49 69 136 42152 Daniel Briesemann +49 69 136 29158 Elisabeth Andreae (Scandinavia. Australia) +49 69 136 24052 Rainer Guntermann +49 69 136 87506 Peter Kinsella +44 20 7475 3959 Carsten Fritsch +49 69 136 21006 Dr Christoph Balz (USA. Fed) +49 69 136 24889 Peggy Jäger +49 69 136 87508 Thu-Lan Nguyen +49 69 136 82878 Dr Michaela Kuhl +49 69 136 29363 Peter Dixon (UK. BoE). London +44 20 7475 4806 Markus Koch +49 69 136 87685 Esther Reichelt +49 69 136 41505 Barbara Lambrecht +49 69 136 22295 Dr Michael Schubert (ECB) +49 69 136 23700 Michael Leister +49 69 136 21264 Dr Michael Schubert (Quant) +49 69 136 23700 Equity Markets Strategy Eckart Tuchtfeld (German economic policy) +49 69 136 23888 David Schnautz +1 212 895 1993 Cross Asset Strategy Dr Marco Wagner (Germany. France. Italy) +49 69 136 84335 Benjamin Schröder +49 69 136 87622 Bernd Weidensteiner (USA. Fed) +49 69 136 24527 Dr Patrick Kohlmann (Head Non-Financials) +49 69 136 22411 Christoph Weil (Euro area) +49 69 136 24041 Emerging Markets Dr Simon Quijano-Evans (Head) +44 20 7475 9200 Dr Bernd Meyer (Head) +49 69 136 87788 Ted Packmohr (Head Covered Bonds and Financials) +49 69 136 87571 Christoph Dolleschal (Deputy Head Research) +49 69 136 21255 Andreas Hürkamp +49 69 136 45925 Markus Wallner +49 69 136 21747 Technical Analysis Achim Matzke (Head) +49 69 136 29138 Other publications (examples) Economic Research: Economic Briefing (up-to-date comment on main indicators and events) Economic Insight (detailed analysis of selected topics) Economic and Market Monitor (chart book presenting our monthly global view) Commodity Research: Commodity Daily (up-to-date comment on commodities markets) Commodity Spotlight (weekly analysis of commodities markets and forecasts) Interest Rate & Credit Research: Ahead of the Curve (flagship publication with analysis and trading strategy for global bond markets European Sunrise (daily comment and trading strategy for euro area bond markets) Rates Radar (ad-hoc topics and trading ideas for bond markets) Covered Bonds Weekly (weekly analysis of the covered bonds markets) Credit Morning Breeze (daily overview on European credit market) Credit Note (trading recommendations for institutional investors) FX Strategy: Daily Currency Briefing (daily comment and forecasts for FX markets) Hot Spots (in-depth analysis of FX market topics) FX Alpha (monthly analyses. models. and trading strategies for FX markets) Weekly Equity Monitor (weekly outlook on equity markets and quarterly company reports) Equity Markets Strategy: Monthly Equity Monitor (monthly outlook on earnings. valuation. and sentiment on equity markets) Digging in Deutschland (thematic research focusing on the German equity market) Emerging Markets: EM Week Ahead (weekly preview on events of upcoming week) EM Briefing (up-to-date comment of important indicators and events) EM Outlook (quarterly flagship publication with EM economic analysis and strategy recommendation) Cross Asset: Cross Asset Monitor (weekly market overview. incl. sentiment and risk indicators) Cross Asset Outlook (monthly analysis of global financial markets and tactical asset allocation) Cross Asset Feature (special reports on cross-asset themes) To receive these publications. please ask your Commerzbank contact. 16 January 2015 19 Economic Research | Week in Focus This document has been created and published by the Corporates & Markets division of Commerzbank AG. Frankfurt/Main or Commerzbank’s branch offices mentioned in the document. Commerzbank Corporates & Markets is the investment banking division of Commerzbank. integrating research. debt. equities. interest rates and foreign exchange. The author(s) of this report. certify that (a) the views expressed in this report accurately reflect their personal views; and (b) no part of their compensation was. is. or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendation(s) or views expressed by them contained in this document. The analyst(s) named on this report are not registered / qualified as research analysts with FINRA and are not subject to NASD Rule 2711. Disclaimer This document is for information purposes only and does not take into account specific circumstances of any recipient. The information contained herein does not constitute the provision of investment advice. It is not intended to be and should not be construed as a recommendation. offer or solicitation to acquire. or dispose of. any of the financial instruments and/or securities mentioned in this document and will not form the basis or a part of any contract or commitment whatsoever. Investors should seek independent professional advice and draw their own conclusions regarding suitability of any transaction including the economic benefits. risks. legal. regulatory. credit. accounting and tax implications. The information in this document is based on public data obtained from sources believed by Commerzbank to be reliable and in good faith. but no representations. guarantees or warranties are made by Commerzbank with regard to accuracy. completeness or suitability of the data. Commerzbank has not performed any independent review or due diligence of publicly available information regarding an unaffiliated reference asset or index. The opinions and estimates contained herein reflect the current judgement of the author(s) on the date of this document and are subject to change without notice. The opinions do not necessarily correspond to the opinions of Commerzbank. Commerzbank does not have an obligation to update. modify or amend this document or to otherwise notify a reader thereof in the event that any matter stated herein. or any opinion. projection. forecast or estimate set forth herein. changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate. This communication may contain trading ideas where Commerzbank may trade in such financial instruments with customers or other counterparties. Any prices provided herein (other than those that are identified as being historical) are indicative only. and do not represent firm quotes as to either size or price. The past performance of financial instruments is not indicative of future results. No assurance can be given that any financial instrument or issuer described herein would yield favourable investment results. Any forecasts or price targets shown for companies and/or securities discussed in this document may not be achieved due to multiple risk factors including without limitation market volatility. sector volatility. corporate actions. the unavailability of complete and accurate information and/or the subsequent transpiration that underlying assumptions made by Commerzbank or by other sources relied upon in the document were inapposite. Commerzbank and or its affiliates may act as a market maker in the instrument(s) and or its derivative that has been mentioned in our research reports. Employees of Commerzbank and or its affiliates may provide written or oral commentary. including trading strategies. to our clients and business units that may be contrary to the opinions conveyed in this research report. Commerzbank may perform or seek to perform investment banking services for issuers mentioned in research reports. Neither Commerzbank nor any of its respective directors. officers or employees accepts any responsibility or liability whatsoever for any expense. loss or damages arising out of or in any way connected with the use of all or any part of this document. Commerzbank may provide hyperlinks to websites of entities mentioned in this document. however the inclusion of a link does not imply that Commerzbank endorses. recommends or approves any material on the linked page or accessible from it. Commerzbank does not accept responsibility whatsoever for any such material. nor for any consequences of its use. This document is for the use of the addressees only and may not be reproduced. redistributed or passed on to any other person or published. in whole or in part. for any purpose. without the prior. written consent of Commerzbank. The manner of distributing this document may be restricted by law or regulation in certain countries. including the United States. Persons into whose possession this document may come are required to inform themselves about and to observe such restrictions. By accepting this document. a recipient hereof agrees to be bound by the foregoing limitations. Additional notes to readers in the following countries: Germany: Commerzbank AG is registered in the Commercial Register at Amtsgericht Frankfurt under the number HRB 32000. Commerzbank AG is supervised by the German regulator Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin). Marie-Curie-Strasse 24-28. 60439 Frankfurt am Main. Germany. United Kingdom: This document has been issued or approved for issue in the UK by Commerzbank AG London Branch. Commerzbank AG. London Branch is authorised by Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin) and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority. Details on the extent of our regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority are available from us on request. This document is directed exclusively to eligible counterparties and professional clients. It is not directed to retail clients. No persons other than an eligible counterparty or a professional client should read or rely on any information in this document. Commerzbank AG. London Branch does not deal for or advise or otherwise offer any investment services to retail clients. United States: This document has been approved for distribution in the US under applicable US law by Commerz Markets LLC (‘Commerz Markets’). a wholly owned subsidiary of Commerzbank AG and a US registered broker-dealer. Any securities transaction by US persons must be effected with Commerz Markets. and transaction in swaps with Commerzbank AG. Under applicable US law; information regarding clients of Commerz Markets may be distributed to other companies within the Commerzbank group. This research report is intended for distribution in the United States solely to “institutional investors” and “major U.S. institutional investors.” as defined in Rule 15a-6 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Commerz Markets is a member of FINRA and SIPC. Commerzbank AG is a provisionally registered swap dealer with the CFTC. Canada: The information contained herein is not. and under no circumstances is to be construed as. a prospectus. an advertisement. a public offering. an offer to sell securities described herein. solicitation of an offer to buy securities described herein. in Canada or any province or territory thereof. Any offer or sale of the securities described herein in Canada will be made only under an exemption from the requirements to file a prospectus with the relevant Canadian securities regulators and only by a dealer properly registered under applicable securities laws or. alternatively. pursuant to an exemption from the dealer registration requirement in the relevant province or territory of Canada in which such offer or sale is made. Under no circumstances is the information contained herein to be construed as investment advice in any province or territory of Canada and is not tailored to the needs of the recipient. In Canada. the information contained herein is intended solely for distribution to Permitted Clients (as such term is defined in National Instrument 31-103) with whom Commerz Markets LLC deals pursuant to the international dealer exemption. To the extent that the information contained herein references securities of an issuer incorporated. formed or created under the laws of Canada or a province or territory of Canada. any trades in such securities may not be conducted through Commerz Markets LLC. No securities commission or similar regulatory authority in Canada has reviewed or in any way passed upon these materials. the information contained herein or the merits of the securities described herein and any representation to the contrary is an offence. Neither Commerzbank AG nor any affiliate acts. or holds itself out. as a dealer in derivatives with respect to any Canadian person. in Canada as a whole or in any Canadian province. and nothing contained in this document may be construed as an offer or indication that Commerzbank is or stands ready to (in each case. with respect to a Canadian counterparty or within Canada) intermediate derivatives trades. act as a market-maker in derivatives of any kind. trade derivatives with the intention of receiving remuneration or compensation. solicit (directly or indirectly) derivatives transactions. provide derivatives clearing services. trade with a non-qualified Canadian party that is not represented by a derivatives dealer or adviser. or engage in activities similar to those of a derivatives dealer. European Economic Area: Where this document has been produced by a legal entity outside of the EEA. the document has been re-issued by Commerzbank AG. London Branch for distribution into the EEA. Singapore: This document is furnished in Singapore by Commerzbank AG. Singapore branch. It may only be received in Singapore by an institutional investor as defined in section 4A of the Securities and Futures Act. Chapter 289 of Singapore (“SFA”) pursuant to section 274 of the SFA. Hong Kong: This document is furnished in Hong Kong by Commerzbank AG. Hong Kong Branch. and may only be received in Hong Kong by ‘professional investors’ within the meaning of Schedule 1 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571) of Hong Kong and any rules made there under. Japan: Commerzbank AG. Tokyo Branch is responsible for the distribution of Research in Japan. Commerzbank AG. Tokyo Branch is regulated by the Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA). Australia: Commerzbank AG does not hold an Australian financial services licence. This document is being distributed in Australia to wholesale customers pursuant to an Australian financial services licence exemption for Commerzbank AG under Class Order 04/1313. Commerzbank AG is regulated by Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin) under the laws of Germany which differ from Australian laws. © Commerzbank AG 2015. All rights reserved. Version 9.18 Commerzbank Corporates & Markets Frankfurt Commerzbank AG DLZ - Gebäude 2. Händlerhaus Mainzer Landstraße 153 60327 Frankfurt Tel: + 49 69 136 21200 20 London Commerzbank AG. London Branch PO BOX 52715 30 Gresham Street London. EC2P 2XY Tel: + 44 207 623 8000 New York Commerz Markets LLC 225 Liberty Street. 32nd floor New York. NY 10281 - 1050 Tel: + 1 212 703 4000 Singapore Branch Commerzbank AG 71. Robinson Road. #12-01 Singapore 068895 Tel: +65 631 10000 Hong Kong Branch Commerzbank AG 29/F. Two IFC 8 Finance Street Central Hong Kong Tel: +852 3988 0988 16 January 2015
© Copyright 2024