Newsletter of the Western North Carolina Chapter of the Society for Neuroscience August 2013 – Issue # 15 Fall Membership Drive & New Officers by David Riddle, Ph.D., President of WNCSfN Inside this issue: President’s Welcome………………1 Mentorship Award………………….1 SfN 2013 Dates……………………….2 WNCSfN Membership……………..2 Milligan New Director…………….3 Oppenheim Neuroscience Pioneer……………………………...4 Grad Student Toolbox ……………5 New Journal Club……………………5 Brain Awareness Council Update………………………………6 “Hallucinations” Book Review…7 GSA Fall Event………………………..7 Award Recipients…………………...8 More summer photos on page 8! WNCSfN Officers: President: David Riddle, Ph.D. Secretary/Treasurer: Thomas Perrault, Ph.D. Councilors: David Friedman, Ph.D. Wayne Pratt, Ph.D. Clinical Councilor: Michael Cartwright, M.D. Postdoctoral Councilor: Dana GreeneSchloesser, Ph.D. Page | 1 As we enter a new academic year, I welcome our beginning students and others who are new to the Western North Carolina neuroscience community. Looking toward the coming year, let me bring your attention to two items. We are getting ready to kick off a major membership drive. In the new reality in which we exist, institutional funds for support of the Chapter and its activities are minimal. Our only reliable source of support is the membership fees paid by individual members. The fees have remained unchanged for many years and remain, for now, at the bargain prices of $30 for one year/$75 for three years for faculty, $20/$50 for post-docs, and $15/$35 for students. Don’t worry if you don’t remember when you last renewed; we know and will be in touch soon. Hopefully everyone in the community will respond quickly and favorably so that we can establish a budget for the year and plan activities appropriately. These funds are critical to support the Fall Research and Poster Day, visiting speakers, and other activities. Please note that strong financial support from members can be helpful when we approach the administration, Society for Neuroscience grants programs, or others seeking additional funds for activities. So please join or renew and, if you know someone that’s new to our neuroscience community, send them a copy of The Neurotransmitter, fill them in on the chapter and its activities, and encourage them to join. Membership forms are available on our website at http://www.wfubmc.edu/SfN/. See page 2 for more details. In the coming month we will elect new members of the chapter executive committee, including a new president, secretary/treasurer, student and post-doctoral councilors, and a councilor. Faculty, students and postdoctoral fellows who wish to be considered as councilors should let me know by email (driddle@wakehealth.edu), or nominate colleagues who you believe could serve the community in this way. Nader & Czoty awarded the Neuroscience Program Mentorship Award By Sarah Kromrey, Neuroscience Graduate student My co-advisors Dr. Michael Nader and Dr. Paul Czoty recently won the Neuroscience Program Mentorship Award. The effort that both of them put forth on a daily basis to best meet my graduate training needs speaks volumes to their commitment to be the finest mentors possible. Individually, either Dr. Nader or Dr. Czoty could have provided unsurpassed mentoring to assist in my development into a proficient neuroscientist, but through working together as co-advisors, they have offered complementary support, encouragement and advice. During my time in the lab, I have attended family dinners, sporting events and competed in mud runs with my advisors (picture on pg 3). They believe that their obligations to me as mentors extend beyond my proficiencies in the laboratory, into supporting me as a happy individual in my personal life as well. Both Dr. Nader and Dr. Czoty have offered profound encouragement to me to help me continue my development into a successful professional and although their support and encouragement remain unfaltering throughout my development, the advice they provide to me on a daily basis has changed in response to my needs. (Continued on page 3) The Neurotransmitter Become a Member of the WNCSfN! Don’t Miss the “Cool” Stuff: Optimize Your Time at SfN 2013! By Ashley Wagoner, Neuroscience Graduate Student I attended SfN for the first time in San Diego 2010. As a senior in college I was so overwhelmed with meeting professors, (trying to get into graduate school), and getting free pens that I missed Glenn Close’s lecture on mental illness and how it has shaped her life. HOW COULD I MISS GLENN CLOSE? Well, it was my first international conference, so I was handed the program (more like encyclopedia), and just winged it. I’m sure I missed a lot of other interesting lectures, social and networking events, and free gadgets during the conference too. Luckily, since then I’ve discovered the online SfN program and the Neuroscience Meeting Planner, which has made it easier to not miss out on events like Chuck Close (2012) and the Graduate Student Fair. This year SfN fails to disappoint. A preview of this year’s featured lectures include the Neuroscience and Society Lecture by Ed Catmull, President of Walt Disney and Pixar Animation studios or the History of Neuroscience Lecture by Roy A Wise from NIDA. This year, be more prepared than my undergrad self and plan ahead! The preliminary program is now available and important dates are below. The next issue of the Neurotransmitter will be full of information about the featured and special lectures, networking events, and making the most of SfN 2013 in San Diego, CA! The Western North Carolina Chapter of the Society for Neuroscience (WNCSfN), a division of SfN, is dedicated to promoting education in the Neurosciences, facilitating Neuroscience outreach in the western North Carolina area, and encouraging interaction among Neuroscience professionals within our research community. The WNCSfN sponsors numerous events including a fall poster session, an annual research symposium, and multiple Brain Awareness Council activities in the community. You can view all our current and past activities on our website. Membership dues make a significant and consistent contribution to our annual budget. We are therefore inviting all faculty, staff, graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and medical residents with interest in the Neurosciences to join the Chapter. Please send us your name, title, department, and email address, along with your dues (cash or check made payable to WNCSfN) to Dr. David Riddle, Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157. Membership Dues: Regular Postdoc Student Page | 2 The Neurotransmitter 1 Year 3 Years $30 $20 $15 $75 $50 $35 Nader/Czoty Award continued… Milligan advances to Neuroscience Program Director As a 3rd year student, they no longer need to oversee my data as they once did, and instead offer me insight into different ways of approaching scientific questions, balancing data collection and manuscript preparation and are consistently my source of problem-solving and career development advice. The mutual respect that I feel from both of these mentors is incomparable. Regardless of our surroundings, be it a private meeting or at public conferences, I feel as though both speak with me as if we are scientific equals, not student and faculty. Because of this, they have instilled in me the confidence and tools to socialize with professionals of all levels, a trait that I am certain will serve me well as I advance to a postdoctoral role and into a successful professional researcher. I have no doubt that the extensive effort both of these renowned scientists have dedicated to me over the past few years (and continue to inspire in me) will allow me to develop into an expert researcher and one-day mentor to future scientists. By Jamie Rose, Neuroscience Graduate student Dr. Carol Milligan was recently named Director of the Program in Neuroscience! She did her PhD work at The Medical College of Pennsylvania and postdoctoral fellowship at University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Dr. Milligan is currently Professor in the department of Neurobiology and Anatomy in the Wake Forest School of Medicine. Her research focuses on understanding mechanisms that contribute to motoneuron dysfunction and degeneration in diseases such as Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Her lab has been continually funded, published numerous manuscripts and “graduated” graduate students who have gone on to positions at NINDS, Arizona State University and Eli Lily. Dr. Milligan has served on NIH or VA study sections continually over the past 12 years. She brings her research and mentoring expertise to the table, as well as the drive to continue the success of the Neuroscience Program. In addition to contributing to the world’s understanding of the molecular mechanisms mediating neuronal cell death and survival in the central nervous system, Dr. Milligan has spent her career working toward further developing our graduate program. She was a member of the task force who developed the foundation for the combined Neuroscience track and served as a member of the Executive Committee. She has also served on the Program’s Student Advisory, Curriculum and Admissions Committees. She has also served on the Program’s Student Advisory, Curriculum and Admissions Committees. She is also the Director of our Clinical Neuroscience Course that involves over 40 clinicians and basic scientists. Dr. Milligan will now be guiding the Program in Neuroscience with Dr. Oppenheim’s retirement in June of this year; however, she believes and emphasizes that no one will replace him, stating “his experience, expertise and vision for the program allows me to start on a very strong foundation.” Pictures: Right Above: Members of the Czoty/Nader lab at the Tough Mudder Race in Fall 2012! Top Left: left to right: Marlena Kuhn (MD/PhD student), Carol Mansfield (lab tech), Matthew Martin (Med student), Jane Strupe (lab tech), Mac Robinson, Ph.D. (Instructor Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy), Kristen Sanders (Graduate Student), Carol Milligan, Ph.D. (Professor Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Director ALS Center Translational Science Unit), Sharon Vinsant (Research Associate). Not pictured: Ron Oppenheim, PhD, Professor Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Director of the Neuroscience Program Page | 3 The Neurotransmitter Recently, I asked Dr. Milligan about her vision for the future of the Program in Neuroscience. As a molecular neuroscientist, Dr. Milligan is well-versed in the building blocks necessary to create a solid, dynamic and well-functioning system. One of the primary building blocks of the Program in Neuroscience is the outstanding faculty associated with the program. These individuals are critical in maintaining the success of the Neuroscience program, and Dr. Milligan commends them, noting that they are all “accomplished investigators that are recognized and respected locally, nationally and internationally.” Additionally, Dr. Milligan believes that the time and intellect our faculty members have invested on NIH study sections, as journal editors and as leaders in the neuroscience community at large, is reflected in the successful post-graduate careers our trainees move on to. She charges the faculty members to remember that they are part-in-parcel of a successful, world-renowned neuroscience program, and urges them to continue building collaborations and professional relationships that promote innovative new projects and avenues of research. (Continued on page 6) Dr. Ronald Oppenheim: Pioneer in Neuroscience By Amie Severino, Neuroscience Graduate Student When Dr. Ronald Oppenheim started grad school at Washington University in St. Louis he was in a time where Neuroscience graduate programs simply didn’t exist. In fact, it wasn’t until 1966, one year before he graduated with his PhD in Neurobiology and Zoology, that the first graduate program in Neuroscience was founded at Harvard University. Luckily for the future of all of us in the Neuroscience program, Dr. Oppenheim wasn’t deterred by the non -existence of Neuroscience; in fact he was inspired to create his own curriculum to supplement his program’s requirements in biology. He constructed an interdisciplinary program for himself by taking courses with medical students and psychology students to get a comprehensive education in brain sciences. This self-made program gave him the foundation to provide guidance for the formation of the Neuroscience program at UNC Chapel Hill in 1970 and later here at Wake Forest University in 1983. Dr. Oppenheim’s body of research is extensive and impressive. On my desk currently is his CV--one that could eat my CV for breakfast and probably need seconds. His interests in neural development and apoptotic processes lead him to look at the neuromuscular junction and it’s degeneration in ALS (Amyotropic Lateral Sclerosis) or Lou Gehrig’s disease. To me, it’s fitting that Dr. Oppenheim would be interested in the complexity of development. His work focuses on how neurons create and maintain appropriate connections, and how without them there must be regulated cell death to create order. The formation and strengthening of connections to create function is a process that seems to transcend neural development and applies to the core philosophy of Neuroscience education. Neuroscience is inherently an interdisciplinary science, where cell and molecular processes are just as important to understand as complex behavioral outcomes. As the program founder and director, Dr. Oppenheim wanted to create and maintain connections between disciplines to create a strong Neuroscience program. The history of the Neuroscience program here at Wake Forest University is fraught with bureaucratic difficulty and struggles to assimilate scientists of different backgrounds. At first Dr. Oppenheim was met with a lot of resistance, as professors in the Anatomy and Physiology/Pharmacology departments were understandably reluctant to lose their unique identities through their separate disciplines. However, neuronal development itself shows us that sometimes change is good. Things need to be pruned and reconnected to be most efficacious, and fortunately this ideology prevailed in the Neuroscience department. Dr. Oppenheim cites the key to his success at this time eventually depended on faculty turnover. He says this sort of challenge mirrored the evolution of Neuroscience on the national scale, where departments disappeared and entire conferences were abandoned to flood the revolutionary field of Neuroscience. Even still, at Wake Forest and on the national scale, scientists were not the only barrier to creating the field. Non-scientists with religious convictions about molecular research were hesitant to advance the field in this direction. About 15 years ago at Wake Forest University, a Dean with moral opposition to stem cell research actually made it difficult for Dr. Oppenheim to encourage faculty with interest in gene technology. This ideology took a long time to fizzle out, but progressive thought and persistance prevailed to create a legacy in this institution that is invaluable to rising scientists. Despite whatever challenges that hinder the progression of science, I still think all of us have dreams for the future of innovation. I wanted to know if Dr. Oppenheim expected the future to be this way during the early years of his career. The Jetsons are still a long ways out from 2013 and I was worried that he might be disappointed or bored with the level of scientific progress we have achieved. It was relieving to me that he was enthusiastic and excited for the advances and future of science. He is impressed with the initiatives we’ve made in molecular biology towards understanding genomics, how the environment impacts gene regulation via epigenetics, and the amazing advances in imaging and brain connectivity mapping. I am glad to see that someone who has been a scientist for over 50 years is not jaded in the way I hear people talking about science lately, who still has wonder and excitement for the future and who will probably have his nose in a journal for the next half century. I think everyone at Wake Forest University would like to thank Dr. Ronald Oppenheim for his service in this institution and in the scientific community, and we all can give back to him by authoring some of these articles he wants to read in the future. Page | 4 The Neurotransmitter New Fall Journal Club! Communicating Science to the General Public Community outreach is an important tool for fostering excitement in science, sharing knowledge with future generations, and improving support for research funding. An essential component of community outreach is being able to effectively communicate science to lay audiences. To help build this skill, a new journal club entitled “Communicating Science to the General Public” is being offered this semester through the neuroscience program at Wake Forest. The goal of this journal club is to introduce students to basic concepts in lay language communication and to give students practice in presenting scientific material to lay audiences. Students will present and discuss a wide range of journal articles using language that can be understood by non-scientists. Students will gain skills not only in translating research findings, but also in explaining their significance and impact. More than a dozen students in several programs, including neuroscience, physiology and pharmacology, microbiology and immunology, cancer biology, and biomedical engineering have already expressed interest, so we are looking forward to a vigorous program. If you have any questions or comments regarding the course or would like to participate, please contact Nichole Emerson at nemerson@wakehealth.edu The “Grad Student Tool Box” is a new feature of The Neurotransmitter the newsletter staff is trying to implement for future issues. We are striving to provide helpful resources geared towards graduate students in order for us all to fill our “tool boxes” with the skills and knowledge needed to survive graduate school and succeed in our future careers. If you have any ideas or resources you would like to share please email Ashley Wagoner. Page | 5 Grad Student Tool Box Finding Your Perfect Postdoc: Initial Steps Leading Up to an Interview. By Jackson Taylor, PhD Twelve months out from my expected graduation date, I had not put a lot of thought into my post doc, but was confident that I would end up in a big name lab, where I would pursue my ideal project while being taught cutting edge techniques. I had a good CV: an NRSA, two respectable first-author papers, and a third soon to be on its way to a highimpact journal. As soon as that last paper was off, I thought, I’d be set. Some professors told me to “start applying a year out, at least,” but I didn’t think I had time to look while I was still furiously working on my final paper (which was also the bulk of my dissertation), and also I didn’t feel confident enough to apply to high caliber labs until my paper was at least “under review” in an eye-catching journal. So I put the post doc search aside until this last piece was in place, which would certainly only take another month or two. Eight months later the paper was accepted for review, and there I was: four months from my planned graduation date and the end of my secured funding, without so much as an interview lined up. I was still confident at this point – at least all the pieces were in place, finding a great post doc would be easy now, I thought. Wrong. Instead, I went through six months of frequent rejection, promising leads that fell through, escalating panic and despair before I finally found my “perfect postdoc.” Besides waiting too long, my next problem was that I had a very ambitious, but also very nebulous, idea of what I wanted to do. This, in turn, contributed to subpar “cold” e-mails. In the beginning, I spent upwards of 6-8 hours reading and researching each professor before e-mailing them, yet the e-mails were too long, unfocused, and ineffective. This process was time-consuming and demoralizing, but also necessary for me to finally reach a point where I had a coherent, confident notion of precisely what I wanted to do. Another issue was that I was trying to enter a field in which I was not highly experienced. Why should a PI take someone who will require additional training when there is an abundance of already-qualified applicants? A notable piece of advice I got was to make sure to market your skills well, i.e. say what you are uncommonly good at and how that can help the professor. For me, the right e-mail ended up being about 200 words in three short st paragraphs. Everything should be as concise as humanly possible. In the 1 paragraph: introduce yourself, your interests, and how your interests relate to this professor. In the nd 2 : tout your skills and how they can serve the professor, and your top accolades. Finish by encouraging a dialogue (via phone, Skype, etc), and thank them for their time. With the right e-mail, I soon found several positive responses. However, I also began to realize just how distant a positive e-mail response is from an actual position. In the end, I found a position here at Wake Forest that had everything I ever wanted. This came about somewhat serendipitously through personal connections and networking, which leads to my final and most important point— talk to as many people as you can. This can lead to unexpected opportunities, and face-to-face interaction always trumps a cold email. Here some additional tips: Start early! “Yeah, let me just finish this…” No, really, start early. But why? o Even with a positive initial response, it can take a long time to set up an interview and an even longer time after that before the PI is ready for you to start. o Contacting a P.I. one-to-two years out from graduation demonstrates sincere interest and commitment. The closer you are to graduation, the more likely you are to seem desperate. NIH RePORTER and Google are your best friends for finding people with money and open positions. Have a clear understanding of your current advisor’s funds and ability (or lack thereof) to support you post thesis defense, either as “student” or postdoc. Talk to everyone you can, even if it doesn’t seem obviously productive. Networking and personal interactions are king, outweighing even a golden CV. A small to moderate part of this all is just luck, e.g. applying at the right time. Don’t count your chickens before they hatch — an interview is a big accomplishment but it is still miles away from an actual offer. Remain diligent until you have a written offer in hand. The Neurotransmitter Brain Awareness Council Update By Jamie Rose, Neuroscience Graduate Student This year, Brain Awareness Season was a total hit! Brain Awareness Season is a nation-wide campaign to increase public awareness, interest and education in basic and neuroscience research. Every year, the Brain Awareness Council at Wake Forest,hosts events throughout the greater Winston-Salem Area, inviting children, students, and parents to learn about the neural correlates of behaviors we often take for granted. This year, the two main events during Brain Awareness Season took place at SciWorks and the Children’s Museum of Winston Salem. In these events, we reached thousands Winston-Salem area residents! If you would like to get involved in Brain Awareness Council or Brain Awareness Season, please contact Jamie Rose at jamrose@wakehealth.edu. This fall BAC will kick off with a general meeting on September 5th at 12PM. The BAC general membership meeting is a phenomenal way for students, faculty and staff to get an overview of the goals and activities of the BAC. There are millions of ways to contribute to the council if you’re interested in participating including volunteering at school visits, station development, and joining the Steering Committee. Any and all graduate students, postdoctorates, faculty, and staff are welcome to the meeting and to join BAC! We’d love to see you there! Neuroflix: Previously known as Neuroscience and a Movie, Neuroflix is an event hosted at a local restaurant where students and community members come together to watch a current movie and discuss neuroscience-related disorders with research and medical professionals. The next Neuroflix event will highlight Post Traumatic Stress Disorder – Look for advertisements in the upcoming months! Milligan Neuroscience director continued… As the new Director of the Program in Neuroscience, Dr. Milligan believes that it is important for her position to provide leadership and promote the development of innovative and collaborative training that serves graduate trainees, postdoctoral fellows and faculty members. To support this training, Dr. Milligan recognizes the importance of reliable funding, and plans on working with faculty and administration of the graduate school to develop strategies to consistently fund the current and incoming Neuroscience students. Dr. Milligan’s determination to ensure that graduate students are given every opportunity to obtain the knowledge and experience to succeed and take on their future scientific endeavours after completing their PhDs is reassuring students during this time of transition and uncertainty. To continue the great legacy of the Program in Neuroscience at the Wake Forest University, Dr. Milligan understands that we must maintain high-quality training, beginning with the basic fundamentals of neuroscience, and continuing through graduation, with intense student-faculty interactions. Furthermore, Dr. Milligan plans on expanding the current research opportunities afforded to trainees to include training in fields such as translational neuroscience, pharma technology, clinical trial design, epidemiology, bioinformatics, and bio-innovation. This additional training will open doors to novel and exciting research opportunities for current and future trainees, allowing us to stay competitive with scientists world-wide. I, along with all others at this institution, would like to extend a warm welcome to Dr. Milligan! Her new position as the Director of the Program in Neuroscience, paired with her progressive mindset, will undoubtedly bring the Neuroscience program to even greater heights. Page | 6 The Neurotransmitter From top to bottom: 1. Janel Suburu, Cancer Biology graduate student at the Brain Anatomy coloring station. 2. Johannes Plate, Neuroscience graduate student showing the four lobes of the brain at the Human Brain station 3. Dominc Gioia, Neuroscience graduate student, helping a student build-a-neuron! Popular Science Book Review: “Hallucinations” by Oliver Sacks By Chris Schaich, Physiology & Pharmacology Graduate Student One astonishing revelation of the human mind uncovered by the study of neuroscience is the fragility of our perception of reality: a mild imbalance in the activation of certain neuronal circuits from drug use or psychiatric disease is often sufficient to evoke profound alterations in sensation and perception. We call these precepts that form in the absence of external reality hallucinations. Despite the stigmas associated with them, drug users and the mentally ill are far from the only people who experience hallucinations. In fact, hallucinogenic experiences are a nearly universal phenomenon. As Dr. Oliver Sacks illustrates in his most recent book Hallucinations, they can provide deep insight into how the human brain functions. Dr. Sacks has a gift for crafting a compelling narrative out of the human nervous system, and he accomplishes this in Hallucinations by combining medical history, scientific background, fascinating (and sometimes downright bizarre) case studies of his patients, as well as his own personal experience. Perhaps because he experienced it himself, Dr. Sacks begins by describing a common (yet little recognized) condition called Charles Bonnet Syndrome (CBS) that afflicts older people suffering from visual impairment. CBS is marked by the experience of a wide spectrum of intensely vivid, complex visual hallucinations. Patients report seeing anything from faces, common objects, repetitive patterns, and even rows of text or sheet music. Often times a “scene” composed of hallucinatory people and objects will play in the patient’s visual field. Patients with CBS are not united by dementia or mental illness, as many doctors mistakenly diagnose. Rather, they suffer from deficits in the visual field. The visual damage that yields CBS hallucinations can arise in the eye (due to macular degeneration, for example) or in the brain, especially in areas of the cortex associated with the visual pathway. Dr. Sacks describes the pioneering research of British psychiatrist Dominic ffytche, who, using fMRI, discovered a “striking correspondence” between the particular hallucinatory experiences of CBS patients and specific portions of the visual pathway that become activated while the patient is hallucinating. For instance, hallucinations of faces were associated with activation of the fusiform gyrus and the superior temporal sulcus, brain areas known to be specialized for the representation of faces and facial features, respectively. As the remainder of Hallucinations reveals, there are hallucinations for every perceptual experience—those of sound, smell, touch and taste, as well as complex, multimodal hallucinations involving a combination of the senses—and their origin is in the brain. Dr. Sacks devotes chapters to describing visual auras seen by sufferers of migraines and epilepsy, and even recounts his own experiences while under the influence of hallucinogenic drugs to hilarious effect. The recurring theme of the book is that the vast majority of people who experience hallucinations are not crazy; the patients Dr. Sacks describes are instead treated as privileged observers of singular neurological phenomena. Dr. Sacks ascribes an almost romantic quality to hallucinations, frequently citing patients who describe their experiences as comforting and even inspiring. Among the more interesting segments are his discussions of how hallucinatory experiences may have contributed to works of art and literature, including myths and certain religious beliefs. “Hallucinations,” writes Dr. Sacks, “beyond any other waking experience, can excite, bewilder, terrify, or inspire, leading to the folklore and the myths (sublime, horrible, creative, playful) which perhaps no individual and no culture can wholly dispense with.” As Dr. Sacks brilliantly illuminates in Hallucinations, the brain frequently separates our sense of what is real and what is illusory with a fuzzy line. Graduate Student Association Update! The GSA at Wake Forest has set a date for the first event of the Fall! This event will be a social mixer for graduate students and a meeting to select GSA departmental Representatives. If you want to become a departmental representative (*Neuroscience rep needed), have any questions, or suggestions for GSA, please email Swapnil Shewale @ sshewale@wakehealth.edu. Page | 7 The Neurotransmitter Date: Friday September 6th, 2013 Time: 6PM-10PM Where: Old Winston Social Club, 1131 Burke Street, Winston-Salem, NC 27101 All Graduate students are welcome! Free food and drink specials will be available! The WNCSfN and Neurotransmitter Staff would like to congratulate the following students and faculty for their recent awards! Neuroscience Program Teaching Award 2012 - In recognition of outstanding teaching efforts, encouragement, and inspiration to future generations of neuroscientists. David Riddle, PhD, Neurobiology & Anatomy Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards (NRSAs) from the NIH: Svitlana Bach, neuroscience graduate student, advised by Dr. Ashok Hegde Malaak Moussa, neuroscience graduate student, advised by Dr. Paul Laurienti & Dr. Linda Porrino Mary Jane Skelly, neuroscience graduate student, advised by Dr. Jeff Weiner Jamie Rose, neuroscience graduate student, advised by Dr. Sara Jones Glenn/American Federation for Aging Research (AFAR) Scholarship: Alexander Birbrair, neuroscience graduate student, advised by Dr. Osvaldo Delbono National Science Foundation (NSF) Predoctoral Research Fellowship Award: Chris Hauser, neuroscience graduate student, advised by Dr. Terrence Stanford & Dr. Emilio Salinas We also want to extend congratulations to Dr. Dwayne Godwin for becoming the new Dean of Graduate Programs in Biomedical Sciences at Wake Forest! Summer time in Science! Even though we all work hard during the summer, we also like to have a little fun too. Here are some photos WNCSfN members shared with the Neurotransmitter! Top Row: David Riddle, PhD, spent some quality vacation time in Africa and snapped photos of many animals in the wild including elephants and leopards! 2nd row: Mahsa Parvizi, neuroscience grad student, went cliff diving into Crater Lake in Oregon! - Nichole Emerson, neuroscience grad student, and her family went to the beach and hung out with a bright yellow python! Bottom Row: Amie Severino, neuroscience grad student, went to Firefly Music Festival in Delaware to see bands like the Avett Brothers (WNC natives!) Susan Appt, DVM, went whitewater kayaking in Ecuador (on page 1 too) Page | 8 The Neurotransmitter The Neurotransmitter Staff: Co-editors: Ashley Wagoner, Graduate Student Neuroscience Program Dwayne Godwin, Ph.D. Neurobiology & Anatomy Contributors: David Riddle, Ph.D. WNCSfN President Neurobiology & Anatomy Amie Severino, Graduate Student Neuroscience Program Chris Schaich, Graduate Student Integrative Physiology & Pharmacology Program Jamie Rose, Graduate Student Neuroscience Program Sarah Kromrey, Graduate Student Neuroscience Program Nichole Emerson, Graduate Student, Neuroscience Program Jackson Taylor, Ph.D. Postdoctorate, Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine Interested in contributing to The Neurotransmitter? Please contact Ashley Wagoner at: aswagone@wakehe alth.edu
© Copyright 2024