AAAS Pacific Division 2015 San Francisco Meeting Symposium Abstracts 11 Blue Carbon and Global Change: Mechanisms, Modeling, Management Connecting Conservation of Coastal Systems with Climate Change Mitigation Through Blue Carbon, STEPHEN CROOKS (Environmental Science Associates, 550 Kearny Street Ste 800, San Francisco, CA 94108; SCrooks@ esassoc.com). Coastal and marine ecosystems play a substantial role in carbon sequestration and storage (referred to as “blue carbon”), representing ~50% of carbon burial across only 2% of ocean area. Yet, despite the importance of these ecosystems to local livelihoods, in maintaining commercial fisheries, and environmental conditions, they are being destroyed at a high rate. At the current pace almost all of the world mangroves will be lost this century, with marshes and seagrasses heavily depleted. There is a critical need for science-based policy, management and financial mechanisms to protect and restore these ecosystems. Last year saw progress towards recognizing the value of coastal wetlands in climate regulation. The IPCC provided technical guidance to countries on accounting for GHG emissions and removals associated with human activities in wetlands. Restore America’s Estuaries submitted for review to the Verified Carbon Standard outlines the first global carbon procedures for connecting restoration of coastal wetlands to voluntary carbon markets. Blue Carbon demonstration activities and programs are building in a number of key countries. While these activities are a start much has yet to be done. Refined science is needed on human impacts to carbon storage. Intriguingly, there appears also to be a link to buffering coastal waters from global ocean acidification which requires further investigation. And there are opportunities to connect blue carbon with greengrey infrastructure approaches in coastal systems. Example policies need to be developed that link the goals and aspirations of local people with the need of all for a balanced climate. Tracking Carbon in Coastal Ecosystems: Sources and Sink in the Muck and the Mire, LISA SCHILE* and PATRICK MEGONIGAL (Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD 21035; schilel@si.edu). Coastal and marine ecosystems, including tidal wetlands, mangroves, and seagrass beds, store significant amounts of carbon, termed ‘blue carbon’, at rates that exceed tropical and temperate forests. These blue carbon ecosystems also can release carbon naturally and through anthropogenic influences such as diking, deforestation, and shrimp farming. Recent recognition of the value of these ecosystems as significant carbon sinks has strengthened worldwide interest in their management, conservation, and restoration for the purpose of climate change mitigation. However, many gaps in understanding carbon sequestration in coastal ecosystems remain, creating challenges for the application of coastal ecosystem carbon research at local, regional and global scales. A major limitation is the fact that most research on this topic has been conducted in relatively few temperate and tropical ecosystems, despite a tremendous amount of spatial variability in carbon stocks across gradients of climate, hydrology, geomorphology, and tide range. Climate change, especially accelerated sea-level rise, threatens their survival. This talk will explore the global distribution and significance of coastal wetlands, and international research to understand carbon dynamics under a changing climate. The Carbon Sink in Low Salinity/Freshwater Reaches of the San Francisco Estuary: Historic Impacts and Future Resiliency, JUDITH DREXLER (U.S. Geological Survey, California Water Science Center, Sacramento, CA 95819; jdrexler@usgs.gov). Tidal marsh soils that form in low salinity and freshwater environments often contain high amounts of organic carbon. Such “peat” soils accumulate over hundreds to thousands of years and are a major carbon sink. In the San Francisco Estuary, peat soils exist in Suisun Marsh and the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Various practices, including drainage and conversion to agriculture and/or impoundment and hydrologic management, have impacted the carbon sink in these areas. In the last 150+ years, large amounts of organic carbon held in peat soils have been lost, leading to land-surface subsidence of up to 8 meters on farmed lands. Due to the plight of sensitive species, there is great interest in restoring wetland habitats in the Delta as well as Suisun Marsh. The success of restoration in these areas relies heavily on re-establishing the conditions that result in peat formation. This is challenging in an era of rapid sea-level rise and decreasing sediment availability, which along with organic matter is an essential component of peat. The Wetland Accretion Model of Ecosystem Resilience was recently used to explore the future sustainability of marshes in the Delta under a broad range of future scenarios. Overall, the modeling results showed that upstream reaches of the Delta, where sea-level rise may be attenuated, and stretches along major river channels, which have high inorganic sedimentation rates, are the best bet for wetland restoration projects because of the longterm sustainability of marshes in these settings. Carbon Sequestration in Natural and Restored Tidal Wetlands in San Francisco Bay, JOHN C. CALLAWAY1*, EVYAN L. BORGNIS1, R. EUGENE TURNER2, and CHARLIE S. MILAN2 (1Department of Environmental Science, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94117; 2Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803; callaway@usfca.edu). There is growing interest in carbon sequestration within tidal wetlands as California and other states consider incorporating tidal wetland restoration activities into carbon trading programs. Our research was designed to establish a baseline for carbon credits for tidal wetland restoration in the San Francisco Bay Estuary. We measured sediment accretion and carbon sequestration rates at six natural tidal wetlands, which serve as potential analogs for long-term carbon sequestration in restored wetlands. Cores from natural wetlands were dated using Cs-137 and Pb210. Although long-term accretion rates could not be measured at restored wetlands, cores were collected from two restored wetlands for comparison of soil organic matter and bulk density. Carbon sequestration rates averaged approximately 80 g/sq. m/yr over the 100-year time span of Pb-210, and rates were slightly higher based on Cs-137. Variation in sequestration rates across sites and stations was smaller than the variation in mineral inputs, and there was little difference in sequestration rates among sites, or across stations within sites, indicating that a single sequestration rate could be used for crediting tidal wetland restoration projects within the Estuary. Surface soil organic matter and bulk density values were similar across natural and restored wetlands, supporting the use of sequestration data from natural wetlands as a surrogate for future sequestration in restored tidal wetlands. Given the need for long-term carbon burial to receive credits within the carbon trading program, we recommend that carbon credit accounting be based on sequestration rates obtained from Pb-210 or other long-term dating methods. Measuring, Monitoring and Modeling Blue Carbon Sinks for Policy Needs: Optimal Integration of Field Data and Remote Sensing of U. S. Coastal Wetlands, LISAMARIE WINDHAM-MYERS (U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 480, Menlo Park, CA 94025; lwindham-myers@usgs.gov). Managing soil carbon (C) storage in coastal “blue carbon” wetlands (such as mangroves, marshes and seagrass habitats) can be a small but significant long-term sink for mitigating carbon pollution, while providing co-benefits such as storm surge attenuation and wildlife support. Although tidal wetlands can store even more C than forests and for longer, they require a unique form of carbon accounting to meet requirements for national and market-based interventions. Whereas forest soil C pools become saturated despite continued tree growth, in tidal wetlands, the soil C pool continues to grow due to organic accumulation commensurate with sea level rise, even as the vegetation C pool becomes saturated. Incorporating “blue carbon” into broadscale C accounting portfolios requires better validation and integration of national-scale datasets on soil C pools, relative sea level rise, and land-cover and landuse changes. A multi-disciplinary team will be evaluating use of Tier 1, 2, and 3 protocols from the IPCC Wetlands Supplement (2013) for documenting the C flux implications of wetland transitions as well as determining constraints for coastal C flux budgets. Our approach leverages recent process-based research and widespread field data on rates of soil C accumulation and loss to model and validate landscape-scale estimates informed by remotely sensed data and GIS modeling. The greatest uncertainty in current “blue carbon” inventory-approaches arises from scaling-up point data across the estuarine landscape. One goal will be to determine the extent to which finer habitat classifications (hydrology, salinity, sea-level rise) continue to inform C accounting with greater accuracy.