Journal of Biotechnology and Biosafety Volume 3, Issue 2, March-April 2015,203-208 ISSN 2322-0406 Journal of Biotechnology and Biosafety Research article AVAILABILITY OF DIFFERENT BRANDS OF ATENOLOL IN DIFFERENT MEDIUM USING UV SPECTROPHOTOMETER _______________________________________ Safila Naveed1, Fatima Qamar1, Syeda Sarah Abbas1, 2, Sehrish Batool3 and Syeda Zainab2 _______________________________________________ 1 Faculty of Pharmacy Jinnah University for women Karachi 2 Faculty of Pharmacy University of Karachi 3 Faculty of Pharmacy Federal Urdu University Corresponding Author: Email: safila117@yahoo.com, fatimamudassar2009@hotmail.com ABSTRACT: Atenolol is introduced in 1976. It is a selective β1 receptor antagonist that belongs to the group called beta-blockers. Atenolol is primarily used to treat angina that is chest pain and hypertension. Moreover it is also used to treat or prevent heart attack. Its mechanism of action is slowing down the heart rate and reduces the workload. Atenolol major advantage over other drugs is that it doesn’t pass through the blood-brain barrier. The assay was done of two different brands of Atenolol which are accessible in market in different medium that is pH1, pH4 & pH7 and linearity was finding out by the help of UV Spectrophotometric technique. Sources of brands were one from the multinational company and another from Local manufacturer. Concentration of different dilutions of 200ppm, 100ppm, 50ppm and 25ppm were made and analyze by measuring their absorbance. In addition absorbance at different concentration was find out and by applying regression it is accomplished that there is a linear relationship between the concentration and absorption. Concentration of different dilutions of 200ppm, 100ppm, 50ppm and 25ppm were made and analyze by measuring their absorbance. The data was also analyzed by one way ANOVA through SPSS version 20. KEYWORDS: Atenolol, beta-blockers, UV Spectrophotometer, Angina, Hypertension, Blood-brain barrier. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION: Chemically Atenolol is (RS)-2-{4-[2-Hydroxy-3-(propan-2ylamino) propoxy] phenyl} acetamide shown in Figure 1. (USP28–NF23) Atenolol a B1 selective adrenoreceptor blockers they don’t have partial agonist activity or stabilizing activity of membrane Its existing indications are for the reason of angina pectoris, myocardial infarction & hypertension., myocardial infarction & Hypertension angina www.jobb.co.in pectoris. They have various mucosal adverse effects such as blistering drug eruption or Bullous drug eruptions are drug eruptions which are fixed. PKa of Atenolol is 9.6 plus it undergoes ionization in the stomach and intestine, therefore its oral bioavailability is low due to ineffective absorption through membranes. Atenolol Bioavailability is between 45% and 55% of the given dose and is not increased on solution form by administration of the drug (Kalkale P A, International, Peer reviewed, Open access, Bimonthly Online Journal Journal of Biotechnology and Biosafety Volume 3, Issue 2, March-April 2015,203-208 ISSN 2322-0406 Soman R N, 1985, Patnarin Kanjanabuch et al, 2012, Melander A et al, 1979, McAinsh J et al, 1980). Atenolol elimination half-life is between 6 and 7 hours and there is no modification of kinetic profile of a drug by chronic administration. It is also mainly one of the most significant and vital drug used for the deterrence of numerous types of arrhythmias in childhood but still it is unlicensed unfortunately (Standing JF, Tuleu C., 2005). Moreover atenolol is indicated as first step therapy for hypertension in elderly patients, those who have difficulty in swallowing and, in consequence, tablets and capsules are recurrently Journal of Biotechnology and Biosafety avoided (Garner SS et al,1994).In addition, atenolol bitterness is considered as a immense confront to health division especially when used among children and geriatrics (Foppa T et al,2007) Incompliance by patients is the main problem in oral administration of bitter drugs such as atenolol (Anroop B et al,2009) and this can be triumph over by masking the bitterness of a drug either by means of decreasing its oral solubility on ingestion or eliminating the interaction of drug particles to taste buds (Sohi H et al,2004). Fig 1: structure of atenolol EXPERIMENTAL METHODOLOGY: UV visible 1601 Shimadzu double beam spectrophotometer was used to dimension of spectra. The solvent which was use for the assay was water. Different market available brands of Atenolol were taken therefore; Drug A denotes tenormin & B for Zafnol. WAVELENGTH SELECTION: About 200ppm of Atenolol solution was accurately prepared in water. This solution was scanned in the 200-400nm UV regions. The wavelength maxima (λmax) was observed at 224nm and this wavelength was adopted for absorbance measurement. 20 tablets of each brand of Atenolol from the marketed sample were weighed and crushed uniformly with the help of a mortar and pestle. On calculating the average weighed sample powder equivalent to 10mg of Atenolol was transferred into a volumetric flask contain 10mLwater. The solution was sonicated for about 5 min and than make up volume up to 50mL with water. The same procedure was adapted for making the solution of Atenolol in different buffer system. We have prepared such solutions in our various studies. (Safila Naveed et al., 2014, Safila Naveed et al., 2015) PROCEDURE: BUFFER PREPARATION: BUFFER pH 1: 9.1mL hydrochloric acid of analytical grade (36%, 11N) was taken in a liter volumetric flask and the volume was made up to the mark with de-ionized water. BUFFER pH4: (CHLORIDE BUFFER) The simple method of preparing buffer solution of pH ranging 4 is to take 0.1M hydrochloric acid and then to add 0.1M potassium chloride solutions until the appropriate pH was attained. SAMPLE SOLUTION PREPARATION: www.jobb.co.in After preparation of sample solutions absorbance of the sample preparation in 1cm cell at the wavelength of maximum absorbance at about 224nm, using a spectrophotometer, using the blank solution was measured. RESULT AND DISCUSSION: The absorbance of Drug A was found to be 1.855 in water, In pH1 it was 2.021 & in pH4 it was 1.565 on the other hand the another brand Drug B its absorbance in water was found to be 1.876,in pH1 it was 2.004 & in pH4 it was 1.578 as shown in Table 2. Linearity may be considered a form of internal or relative accuracy; for a specific focal point, it reflects how sound a system responds to a series of dilutions in the proper matrix (Reilly WJ. Remington, 2002). In the International, Peer reviewed, Open access, Bimonthly Online Journal Journal of Biotechnology and Biosafety Volume 3, Issue 2, March-April 2015,203-208 ISSN 2322-0406 Journal of Biotechnology and Biosafety National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) guidelines (EP6-P), linearity is defined as the “measure of the degree to which a curve approximates a straight line (Paaaey RB et al, 1986) consequently, the outcome of linearity on this study was found to be for Brand A in 200ppm it was 1.855,for Drug B it showed 1.876 for 100ppm the 0.976 for Drug A & 0.988 for B similarly for 50ppm they were 0.586 for Drug A and 0.566 for Drug B therefore our last linearity which was 25ppm found to be 0.245 for Drug A & 0.324 for Drug B Brand (Table 1). For Comparative studies amongst the two different brands the SPPS Version 20 was implemented and there is significant difference and the values of P are 0.000. We conclude that there is no difference between the brands but significant difference in different PH medium. We already performed these types of assay that helpful for pharmacist to choose best drug. (Safila Naveed et al., 2014, Safila Naveed et al., 2015) Table 1: Absorbance at different Concentrations & Regression Equation Ph1 Ph4 Ph7 Brands Abs Abs Abs Regression 2.021 1.565 1.855 y=0.008x A 2.004 1.578 1.876 y = 0.008x B R² 0.995 0.999 Table 2: Absorbance at Different ppm Concentration Brands Drug A Drug B 200 1.855 1.876 100 0.976 0.988 50 0.586 0.566 25 0.245 0.324 Table 3: One Way ANOVA between groups and within groups PH4 PH7 PH1 Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups .000 1 .000 760.500 .000 Within Groups .000 4 .000 Total .000 5 Between Groups .001 1 .001 1.024E3 .000 Within Groups .000 4 .000 Total .001 5 Between Groups .000 1 .000 1.405E3 .000 Within Groups .000 4 .000 www.jobb.co.in International, Peer reviewed, Open access, Bimonthly Online Journal Journal of Biotechnology and Biosafety Volume 3, Issue 2, March-April 2015,203-208 ISSN 2322-0406 Journal of Biotechnology and Biosafety Table 3: One Way ANOVA between groups and within groups PH4 PH7 PH1 Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups .000 1 .000 760.500 .000 Within Groups .000 4 .000 Total .000 5 Between Groups .001 1 .001 1.024E3 .000 Within Groups .000 4 .000 Total .001 5 Between Groups .000 1 .000 1.405E3 .000 Within Groups .000 4 .000 Total .000 5 Fig-2: Absorbance of Drug A at different strength www.jobb.co.in International, Peer reviewed, Open access, Bimonthly Online Journal Journal of Biotechnology and Biosafety Volume 3, Issue 2, March-April 2015,203-208 ISSN 2322-0406 Journal of Biotechnology and Biosafety Fig-3: Absorbance of Drug B at different strength CONCLUSION Both the brands of Atenolol i.e. brand A and B shows equivalent results in different mediums. Hence both brands are equivalent. Both brands meet the requirement of USP/BP for availability of drug. REFERENCES: Anroop B, Ghosh B, Parcha V, Khanam J (2009). Transdermal delivery of atenolol: effect of prodrugs and iontophoresis. Current Drug Delivery. 6(3):280– 290. [PubMed] Garner SS, Wiest DB, Reynolds ER., Jr (1994). Stability of atenolol in an extemporaneously compounded oral liquid. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy. 51(4):508–511. [PubMed] Foppa T, Murakami FS, Silva MAS (2007). Development, validation and stability study of pediatric atenolol syrup. Pharmazie. 62(7):519–521. [PubMed] KalKale P A, Soman R N (1985). Atenolol as an antihypertensive drug, J Postgrad Med. 31:187 Melander A, Stenberg P, Liedholm H (1979). Foodinduced reduction in bioavailability of atenolol. European www.jobb.co.in Journal of 330. [PubMed] Clinical Pharmacology. 16(5):327– McAinsh J, Simpson WT, Holmes BF (1980). Bioavailability of atenolol formulations. Biopharmaceutics and Drug Disposition. 1(6):323–332. [PubMed] Paaaey RB, Bee DE, Caffo A, Erikaon JM (1986). Evaluation of the linearity of quantitative analytical methods; proposed guideline. NCCLS Document EP6-P. Villanova, PA:National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Patnarin Kanjanabuch, Samornroj Arporniem, Suparat Thamrat and Pannipa Thumasombut (2012) Mucous membrane pemphigoid in a patient with hypertension treated with atenolol: a case report Journal of Medical Case Reports. 6:373 doi:10.1186/1752-1947-6-373 International, Peer reviewed, Open access, Bimonthly Online Journal Journal of Biotechnology and Biosafety Volume 3, Issue 2, March-April 2015,203-208 ISSN 2322-0406 Reilly WJ. Remington Martin H. Kroll and Kenneth Emancipator (1993): The Science and Practice of Pharmacy. Mack Publishing Company; 2002. Pharmaceutical necessities; pp. 1018–1020.14. CLIN.CHEM. 39/3, 405-413 (1993) A Theoretical Evaluation of Linearity. Safila Naveed and Fatima Qamar (2014) Simple UV spectrophotometric assay of Metronidazole Open Access Library Journal, 1: e615: 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1100615 Safila Naveed and Fatima Qamar (2014) Simple UV spectrophotometric assay of Clarithromycin International Journal of Pharma Sciences and Research (IJPSR) Vol 5:9:583-585 SafilaNaveed, (2014) Analytical Method for Estimation of Losartan by using UV –Spectrophotometer Global Journal of Medical Research. 14(4):15-18 Journal of Biotechnology and Biosafety Safila Naveed and Fatima Qamar (2014) Comparative study of different Brands of Alprazolam. Global Journal of Medical Research 14(3): 2528.https://globaljournals.org/GJMR_Volume14/5Comparative-Study-of-Different-Brands.pdf Safila Naveed, Hina Rehman, Fatima Qamar, Syeda Zainab (2015). Method development of Perindopril using UV spectrophotometer (2015) International journal of pharmaceutical Quality Assurance: 6(1) http://ijpqa.com/# Sohi H, Sultana Y, Khar RK (2004). Taste masking technologies in oral pharmaceuticals: recent developments and approaches. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 30(5): 429–448. [PubMed] Standing JF, Tuleu C (2005). Paediatric formulations— getting to the heart of the problem. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 300(1-2):56–66. [PubMed] USP28–NF23 29(5):1416 Page 193 Pharmacopeial Forum: Citation of this article: Safila Naveed, Fatima Qamar, Syeda Sarah Abbas, Sehrish Batool and Syeda Zainab (2015). AVAILABILITY OF DIFFERENT BRANDS OF ATENOLOL IN DIFFERENT MEDIUM USING UV SPECTROPHOTOMETER. Journal of Biotechnology and Biosafety. 3(2): 203-208. Source of Support: Nil www.jobb.co.in Conflict of Interest: None Declared International, Peer reviewed, Open access, Bimonthly Online Journal
© Copyright 2024