Headquarters U.S. Air Force Integrity - Service - Excellence How to Apply GeoBase to Your Mission Mr. Stephen Luttrell JSEM 2007 Columbus, OH Purpose Provide an update on GeoBase Highlight major initiatives & policies effecting AF Information Technology and GeoBase Facilitate a discussion on policy impacts, GeoBase capabilities, and direction Gather feedback from environmental professionals Integrity - Service - Excellence Agenda Review of GeoBase Program Purpose Organization Terms & Concepts New Drivers for GeoBase Portfolio Management Data Standardization & Mission Data Sets (MDS) GeoBase Architecture development Meeting new challenges Information requirements Consolidated Services Total accounting of investments Discussion Integrity - Service - Excellence GeoBase Review Implemented within the Installations and Environment domain to eliminate redundant mapping efforts and duplicative data Provides a common IT framework for mapping technologies – The GeoBase Service Consolidates collection of common data elements – The Common Installation Picture Empower functionals to identify their geospatial requirements via Mission Data Sets Program executed via Geo Integration Offices (GIOs) Installation GIOs collect data and provide direct mission support MAJCOM GIOs manage implementation and provide resources HAF GIO develops policy and program oversight Integrity - Service - Excellence Terms & Concepts Common Installation Picture (CIP) Mission Data Sets 36 Data elements identified as the common “core” map required by most missions Collected and served by the GIO Available to all USAF personnel Based on functional requirements Collected by various means, made available via the GeoBase service Access to MDS based on need to know Most MDS are standardized at the MAJCOM level GeoBase Service Collection of COTS and GOTS used to serve geospatial data and applications MAJCOMs are now consolidating installation services at the command level Available via AF networks and protected behind CAC/PKI login Integrity - Service - Excellence GeoBase & the DoD Defense Agencies DoD “Enterprise” missions (RPI, DCIP) Federal Agencies Combatant Commands Department, OSD Strategic Focus Component Regions and Major Commands Installations Installation Data Feature Stewards Integrity - Service - Excellence Tactical Focus Time of Transition A7C Transformation will have rippling effects on its IT programs – ACES, GeoBase, EESOH Congress and the AF require visibility on all IT investments, before they happen GeoBase is transforming from 10 MAJCOM centric systems to a single AF system Many new policies and processes have been published to address these issues --- how do we adjust? Integrity - Service - Excellence Integrity - Service - Excellence Overview of Key Policies 2005 NDAA - Portfolio Management Policy (PfM) Oversight by Congress, OSD, SAF/XC, A4IS Components are required to track all IT investments IT investments must align with mission priorities SECAF Data Transparency Policy - Information Management via Communities of Interest (COIs) SECAF established USAF Information Management policy with the goal of Data Transparency The Transparency Integrated Product Team (TIPT) oversees the implementation of the Data Transparency policy Air Force Enterprise Architecture Global Combat Support System – Air Force (GCSS-AF) is the future IT backbone of the AF AF Portal will serve as the entry point for all systems New systems must comply with its architecture Integrity - Service - Excellence Information Policy Components Data Transparency is a policy issued by the SECAF and applicable to all AF data/information Clearly defines all information as an AF asset Sets the priorities and responsibilities of information owners, producers, and users Establishes a framework for implementation of the policy Communities of Interest (COIs) are the implementing arm of Data Transparency Secretary Wynn chairs an oversight group called the Transparency Integrated Product Team (TIPT) A COI coordination panel facilitates the development of COIs as required COIs provide a formal process for documenting information and establish it as an AF wide standard Integrity - Service - Excellence GeoBase & COIs SECAF Transparency initiative is active and gaining momentum Most Air Staff directorates are now heavily involved COIs provide visibility to high level initiatives – RP, EL LIMS-DP is the functional COI for most I&E information GeoBase initiated a cross functional COI with Ops and Intel – Fall 2006 COI would serve as a coordinating body for all geospatial information in the AF Other COIs, such as the LIMS-DP would interact with the COI for their geospatial requirements COI Primer outlines the “vocabulary” requirements Glossary, Semantic Model, Thesaurus, LDM, and authoritative sources The vocabulary requirements will replace current program documentation Integrity - Service - Excellence COI Process – First Steps Step 1 - Functional community identifies a process that requires a MDS Step 2 - Functionals and GIOs develop list of requirements and submit to the functional community for review and comment Step 3 - Completed list of MDS requirements is documented according to COI requirements Step 4 - HAF GIO staffs the MDS as a program requirement for GeoBase Step 5 – Push MDS to COIs for review & adoption Integrity - Service - Excellence Portfolio Management (PfM) Policy Portfolio Management is the term used to describe the methods by which the Department of Defense governs and reports on its investment in Information Technology (IT) tools, applications and systems PfM Policy is driven by congressional oversight and applies to all DoD personnel regardless of mission area PfM plays a large role in DoD and AF Transformation activities Supports the automation of processes and decision making Designed to ensure no resources are expended on redundant applications GeoBase is now reviewing all of its investments for compliance with PfM guidance Integrity - Service - Excellence GeoBase & PfM Today Portfolio Reporting in the Enterprise IT Data Repository (EITDR) EITDR is the web-based system that catalogs all AF IT investments for review by SECAF, OSD and Congress All AF personnel executing IT investment are required to enter those investments in EITDR Leadership approval is based on the data entered in the system Actions for Portfolio Management stakeholders A6s at the MAJCOM and HAF level review EITDR entries and gather reports for SAF/XC and OSD Functionals must define their IT requirements and track the IT investment Developers must build solutions that conform to AF architecture standards and PfM policies Integrity - Service - Excellence GeoBase Architecture Current program capabilities Most MAJCOMs are a mix of installation and MAJCOM level data services and applications Small level of content available through the AF Portal Planned capabilities Standardize MAJCOM architecture - One look and feel for GeoBase across the AF Standardize the tools that provide functional support Support our PfM requirements Will require active engagement from functionals, GeoBase won’t pick your solutions for you Move towards a more centralized model for program execution e.g. centralize resources, selection of Lead Commands GCSS-AF provides the ultimate “to-be” Architecture for nearly AF functional communities Integrity - Service - Excellence GeoBase Architecture Yesterday Today Tomorrow GCSS-AF Many Orgs with different maps at Base level Multiple Local & Portal Viewers 1. Enterprise Viewer/Editor No AFI No data for Enterprise View Similar but disparate efforts Local RP Database Local Geo Database Maturing Capabilities Integrity Many Versions - S Ten e r v i cVersions e - Excellence 2. Enterprise Data Strategy Enterprise Capability 1 AF Service GeoBase Recap Focus on Data Standardization Purpose - standard data drives standard tools Functional community must identify the requirements as the first step SECAF Data Transparency policy provides a standard approach for the AF Development of the Enterprise Architecture Standardize MAJCOM efforts & tools Develop the plan for GCSS-AF integration Retire redundant applications and systems Portfolio Management (PfM) reporting Entry of all systems in EITDR Alignment of applications with requirements Integrity - Service - Excellence Impact on Environmental Identify your priorities as a functional community Focus on the process not a specific tool that might fit your needs Use formal and transparent methods to define your requirements Staff Packages, working groups, A7C Monthly VTCs Information requirements should come first Quality data is essential avoid Garbage In, Garbage Out Standard tools flow naturally from standard data Meet the PfM Requirements and use the processes SAF/XC policies are not a hurdle, they are legally required Process helps ensure the survival of your system Integrity - Service - Excellence Geo-Enabling – First Steps Step 1 - Functional community identifies a process that requires a MDS Step 2 - Functionals and GIOs develop list of requirements and submit to the functional community for review and comment Step 3 - Completed list of MDS requirements is documented according to COI requirements Step 4 - HAF GIO staffs the MDS as a program requirement for GeoBase Step 5 – Push MDS to COIs for review & adoption Integrity - Service - Excellence Key Takeaways Congressional oversight and budget restrictions are forcing rapid changes in DoD IT Policy Environmental Managers must define AF-wide information requirements Pursuing local level solutions is no longer an option Connect Air Staff information policies and procedures to functionals needs Communication between IT professionals and functionals is essential to success Without dialog divergent paths will emerge and IT solutions won’t meet the needs of the Air Force Integrity - Service - Excellence Discussion General Questions and Comments Discussion of community priorities How are you currently using GIS Where are the needs for Environmental? What processes require GIS? What is your desired “end-state” Follow ups Integrity - Service - Excellence Contact Information Lt Col Andrew Lambert Headquarters Air Force Geo Integration Officer (HAF GIO) andrew.lambert@pentagon.af.mil Mr. Stephen Luttrell A7CIS GeoBase Integration & Outreach stephen.luttrell@pentagon.af.mil Integrity - Service - Excellence
© Copyright 2024