a pilot project of innovative public procurement (IPP) in biomedical technologies WHY WE NEED A NEW SYSTEM OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT January 2013 The Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL) center manages research carried out by professionals of the Bellvitge University Hospital, The Duran i Reynals Hospital (ICO), and the Bellvitge Campus of the University of Barcelona. IDIBELL is located in Biopol’H, the scientific and health business park of L’Hospitalet de Llobregat. solid organ transplantation index 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Spain is world leader in surgical interventions of high complexity solid organ transplantations per million only main European countries Source ONT, 2007 relative contribution to the European sectorial NAV 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 españa belgica francia irlanda italia finlandia austria alemania suecia regne unit holanda dinamarca NAV (net added value): industry‐wide contribution to the European GDP expressed in percentages over total sectorial NAV Source: Panorama de la Industria Europea, 2000 • we have been doing something wrong for decades • we are not utilizing our medical knowledge to generate our own industrial sector pilot project for innovative public procurement • an experimental approach • small is beautiful – and useful • governments keep moving on with their policies • this is a parallel initiative and seeks to obtain firsthand experience and hard data. goals 1. test the implementation of this tool in the field, in a hospital setting of high complexity. 2. document the economic impact of its application. scope • geographical – limited to our Bellvitge campus and the two large hospitals: ICO y HUB • technical – pharmaceuticals, medical devices, instrumentation, equipment, information technologies, organisational tools, or others. proposals products or services that bring about cost savings to the public health system by introducing technical improvements, by replacing former costs, or through different pricing strategies, among others. products or services in the precompetitive stage, that need to prove efficacy and cost efficiency. This should allow promoters to enter the market successfully, and should allow the hospitals to capitalise the demonstration effect they contribute to. expected benefits • reduce health care spending. • improve the competitiveness of companies that participate. • improve health care. • generate employment. • pave the road for the adoption of a IPPP policy by the government. plan of action 1. proposal‐collection phase 2. evaluation and selection 3. call definition 4. call issuing 5. final evaluation and report (summer 2013) first case: PCR based endometrial cancer test MPM Rama Control BE (Cornier) Positiva (Cáncer/Hiperpla sia) Protocolo Cáncer Endometrio Negativa No concluyente ECOTV LE <4 mm No más síntomas (sangrado) Persistencia de síntomas ALTA HISTEROSCOPIA ECOTV LE>4 mm HISTEROSCOPIA MPM Rama Control BE (Cornier) Positiva (Cáncer/Hiperpl asia) Protocolo Cáncer Endometrio the system could reduce the need for histeroscopies Negativa No concluyente ECOTV LE <4 mm No más síntomas (sangrado) Persistencia de síntomas ALTA HISTEROSCOPIA ECOTV LE>4 mm HISTEROSCOPIA stalemate? • cost advantages were difficult to estimate • also, they vary considerably in different hospitals this could have been the end of it! MPM Rama Control BE (Cornier) Positiva (Cáncer/Hiperpl asia) Protocolo Cáncer Endometrio Negativa No concluyente ECOTV LE <4 mm No más síntomas (sangrado) Persistencia de síntomas ALTA HISTEROSCOPIA ECOTV LE>4 mm HISTEROSCOPIA MPM Rama Control BE (Cornier) Positiva (Cáncer/Hiper plasia) Protocolo Cáncer Endometrio HOSPITAL Negativa No concluyente ECOTV LE <4 mm No más síntomas (sangrado) Persistencia de síntomas ALTA HISTEROSCOPIA PRIMARY ECOTV LE>4 mm HISTEROSCOPIA MPM Rama estudio BE (Cornier) GX (Gynec Dx) BE Positiva GX Positivo BE Positiva GX Negativo Protocolo Cáncer Endometrio BE Negativa GX Positivo Histeroscopia * BE Negativa GX Negativo ALTA ALTA HOSPITAL MPM Rama estudio PRIMARY BE (Cornier) GX (Gynec Dx) BE Positiva GX Positivo BE Positiva GX Negativo Protocolo Cáncer Endometrio BE Negativa GX Positivo Histeroscopia * BE Negativa GX Negativo ALTA ALTA • we were all looking at a possible alternative test in the hospital, • but the real savings seem to be in sending the test away from the hospital and into the primary care units • this is expected to dramatically reduce the number of hospital interventions – why didn’t anybody think of that before? showcasing the technology • randomized pharmacoeconomic study – 30 + 30 cases – three to six months – to validate the circuits and to measure the number of patients that reach the hospital from both lines (old protocol, new protocol) – 1% royalty on sales within catalonia for 5 years • link what have we learned so far? • there are less opportunities than we thought – and they take longer to mature • even the best offers need a lot of work – think outside the box (or the hospital) – a climate of confidence and collaboration is essential food for thought • why is this so? – an innovative costumer creates an innovative system – but the opposite is also true! • no huge structural changes are needed – ...why is not everybody doing this? take‐home message you can trust the administration to do the right thing... after having exhausted all the other possibilities! thanks for your attention! epola@idibell.cat
© Copyright 2024