1. science
2. chemistry

Journal of Chromatography A, 856 (1999) 145–177
www.elsevier.com / locate / chroma
Review
Developments in sample preparation and separation techniques for
the determination of inorganic ions by ion chromatography and
capillary electrophoresis
Paul R. Haddad*, Philip Doble, Miroslav Macka
School of Chemistry, University of Tasmania, G.P.O. Box 252 -75, Hobart 7001, Australia
Abstract
A review is presented of sample preparation and separation techniques for the determination of inorganic ions by ion
chromatography (IC) and capillary electrophoresis (CE). Emphasis has been placed on those sample treatment methods
which are specific to inorganic analysis, and the developments in separation methods which are discussed are those which
enhance the capabilities of IC and CE to handle complex sample matrices. Topics discussed include solid-phase extraction
for sample clean-up and preconcentration, dialytic methods, combustion methods, matrix-elimination IC, electrostatic IC,
electrically polarised ion-exchange resins, electromigration sample preparation in CE, chromatographic sample preparation
for CE, use of high-ionic strength background electrolytes, buffering of background electrolytes in CE, use of capillary
electrochromatography for inorganic determinations, and methods for the manipulation of separation selectivity in both IC
and CE. Finally, some possible future trends are discussed.  1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Reviews; Sample preparation; Inorganic ions
Contents
1. Introduction and scope of this review........................................................................................................................................
2. Ion chromatography ................................................................................................................................................................
2.1. Sample preparation for IC................................................................................................................................................
2.1.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................
2.1.2. Manipulation of separation selectivity...................................................................................................................
2.1.3. Solid-phase extraction (SPE) for sample preconcentration and clean-up (Table 1)....................................................
2.1.4. Sample clean-up using dialytic methods................................................................................................................
2.1.5. Sample preparation using combustion ...................................................................................................................
2.2. Developments in IC separation methods ...........................................................................................................................
2.2.1. Matrix elimination IC ..........................................................................................................................................
2.2.2. New separation methods ......................................................................................................................................
2.2.3. Electrically polarised ion-exchange resins .............................................................................................................
*Corresponding author. Fax: 161-3-6226-2858.
E-mail address: paul.haddad@utas.edu.au (P.R. Haddad)
0021-9673 / 99 / $ – see front matter  1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S0021-9673( 99 )00431-8
146
146
147
147
148
148
152
154
154
156
156
159
146
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
3. Capillary electrophoresis (CE) for inorganic analysis .................................................................................................................
3.1. Sample preparation for CE...............................................................................................................................................
3.1.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................
3.1.2. Manipulation of separation selectivity in CE .........................................................................................................
3.1.3. General sample treatment.....................................................................................................................................
3.1.4. Electromigration sample preparation techniques ....................................................................................................
3.1.5. Chromatographic sample preparation ....................................................................................................................
3.1.6. Sample preparation using dialysis.........................................................................................................................
3.2. Developments in CE separation methods ..........................................................................................................................
3.2.1. High-ionic strength BGEs ....................................................................................................................................
3.2.2. Buffering of BGEs ..............................................................................................................................................
3.2.3. New CE preparation methods ...............................................................................................................................
4. Future trends...........................................................................................................................................................................
4.1. Comparison of IC and CE................................................................................................................................................
4.2. IC and CE in the next millennium ....................................................................................................................................
References ..................................................................................................................................................................................
1. Introduction and scope of this review
Separation science methods have become highly
developed tools for the determination of inorganic
species. Ion chromatography (IC), introduced in
1975 by Small and co-workers [1], provided the first
viable analytical method for the simultaneous determination of inorganic anions at trace levels. Whilst
IC could also be used successfully for the determination of cations, there were several suitable alternative analytical techniques (mainly spectroscopic in
nature) for these species so the development of IC
was driven chiefly by the need for improved methods
for anion determination. A great deal of research
effort and commercial development has been directed towards the development of IC and the
technique can now be considered to be mature. This
is reflected in the very wide range of sample types to
which IC has been applied and the resultant variety
in sample handling procedures which have been
designed to support IC analyses. In contrast to IC,
capillary electrophoresis (CE) of inorganic species is
a relatively new technique, having been introduced
in 1990 [2]. Much of the published work in this field
relates to the study of fundamental separation processes, so that applications of CE to samples is less
developed than is the case for IC.
This review describes some of the more important
sample handling procedures which are applicable to
IC and CE. The coverage of these procedures is not
intended to be comprehensive but rather to outline to
the reader those developments which are of par-
161
162
162
162
165
166
167
168
168
168
170
171
172
172
174
175
ticular relevance to the analytical techniques
concerned. Since the degree of sample preparation in
an analysis is dependent to some extent on the
efficiency and selectivity of the separation method,
some discussion of recent developments in the
separation methods themselves is also included, with
an emphasis on those developments which extend the
applicability of the separation methods to more
complex samples. Again, the discussion of these
developments is not intended to be comprehensive.
Readers seeking more detailed discussion are referred to reference texts on IC [3–8] and CE [9–13].
2. Ion chromatography
The term ‘ion chromatography’ does not refer to a
specific technique defined by the nature of the
stationary and mobile phases, but rather to a group of
related liquid chromatographic methods that are
applicable to a particular group of analytes. These
analytes include inorganic anions and cations, as
well as low-molecular-mass organic acids and bases.
For the purposes of this discussion it is necessary to
confine this definition somewhat, and this review
will concentrate on the most common application
areas of IC, namely the separation of inorganic
anions and cations by ion exchange. The separation
of organometallic species will not be discussed and
only limited attention will be given to the separation
of metal chelates. Ion chromatographs, whether
operated in the suppressed or non-suppressed mode,
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
are almost always fitted with a conductivity detector,
which is often supplemented with a UV–Vis absorbance detector. In this review it will be assumed
that the sample preparation methods outlined in
Section 2.1 are intended for use with such a mainstream instrument, with any newer developments in
separation techniques being discussed separately in
Section 2.2.
2.1. Sample preparation for IC
2.1.1. Introduction
The most challenging samples in IC are those in
which the analyte is present at low concentration in a
sample matrix of high ionic strength or of extreme
pH. Examples would include the determination of
trace ions in brines, concentrated acids or concentrated alkalis. The reason why these samples are
problematic is that the dominant matrix ion often
exerts an ion-exchange displacing effect, leading to
band broadening and poor separation, or the extreme
pH of the sample causes profound disturbances to the
critical acid–base equilibria existing in the eluent.
Perhaps the most widely used approach in the case
of a high-ionic strength sample is to minimise the
amount of sample injected onto the column so that
147
the dominant matrix ion no longer exerts a deleterious effect on the separation, and to employ a
selective detection method. The sample load can be
reduced either by diluting the sample or through the
use of a small sample volume. Fig. 1 shows an
example of this approach applied to the determination of free and complexed cyanide species in a
processing liquor taken from a gold cyanidation plant
[14]. The important analytical parameter is the ratio
of cyanide to copper and this is obtained by first
separating the metallo-cyanide species using reversed-phase ion-interaction chromatography, and
then applying post-column reaction to visualise the
free cyanide and the labile cyanide bound to the
copper(I). The ratio of the areas of the free cyanide
and copper(I) peaks in the second chromatogram of
Fig. 1 can be used to determine the CN:Cu in the
sample and, ultimately, to optimise the gold extraction process. This approach has been developed
for on-line process control of gold extraction in
remote mine sites.
The above approach has obvious limitations in that
reduction in the amount of the dominant matrix ion
injected onto the column also leads to a reduction in
the amount of analyte injected. The sensitivity of the
detection method will, therefore, determine the ap-
Fig. 1. Chromatogram obtained from a leach liquor. (a) Direct UV detection; (b) UV detection after post-column reaction. Reproduced with
permission from Ref. [14].
148
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
plicability of this approach. Many samples will,
therefore, require the use of alternative methods and
some of these are discussed in Section 2.2.2 below.
2.1.2. Manipulation of separation selectivity
When a desired separation is limited by interference from a dominant matrix ion, variation of the
separation selectivity may be employed as a means
to improve separation. In IC, the separation is most
often accomplished by ion-exchange chromatography, where the separation selectivity results chiefly
from the electrostatic interactions of the analyte ions
with the fixed ions on the stationary phase, with
some secondary selectivity effects arising from other
factors such as the size and polarisability of the
analyte ion, its degree of adsorption onto the unfunctionalised portions of the stationary phase, and
the nature of the fixed group on the stationary phase.
The ability to manipulate separation selectivity is,
therefore, rather limited and is usually accomplished
by the development of new stationary phases in
which specific functional groups are bound to polymers having specific adsorption properties. Success
with this approach requires access to a range of
stationary phases having different selectivity.
Some selectivity differences arise from changes in
the composition of the eluent, especially for analyte
ions of different charge. However, it is often impractical to empirically optimise the eluent composition because of the time required to equilibrate
the stationary phase with each new eluent composition. Considerable interest has, therefore, been
directed towards the development of suitable mathematical retention models which allow prediction of
retention times for a wide range of eluent compositions, and hence computer-assisted optimisation
of the eluent composition. Several mathematical
retention models of varying complexity have been
developed and these have been compared in a recent
series of articles [15–17] by determining their predictive capabilities using a common data set of
retention data obtained for a wide range of analyte
anions using several stationary phases for both
suppressed and non-suppressed IC. This comparison
shows that the more complex models give better
predictive capabilities but are more difficult to
implement because they require significant input
parameters. The most practical approach to retention
modelling appears to be the use of an semi-empirical
method whereby retention data are measured for
eluent compositions at the extremes of the desired
search area and an appropriate algorithm is then used
to interpolate retention data at intermediate eluent
compositions. Commercial software (such as
DryLab, from LC Resources, Walnut Creek, CA,
USA) is suitable for this purpose. Artificial neural
networks (ANNs) have been shown to have great
potential for the prediction of IC retention data on
the basis of training the ANN using a small set of
experimental retention data [18], and it is probable
that this approach will find more widespread application in the future.
2.1.3. Solid-phase extraction ( SPE) for sample
preconcentration and clean-up ( Table 1)
The most popular method of trace enrichment in
IC involves the use of a separate pre-column designed to trap trace levels of solutes from a large
volume of sample. This method is simple and
convenient to apply, and has the major advantage of
ease of automation. Further, high enrichment factors
are achieved and the technique is less prone to
sample contamination effects than other methods.
The general procedure for trace enrichment with a
preconcentration column is as follows. An accurately
known volume of the sample is pumped through a
small ion-exchange pre-column (or a reversed-phase
pre-column coated with an ion-interaction reagent),
using a syringe, or in the case of an automated
system, with a HPLC pump. Analyte ions are trapped
selectively on the concentrator column and then
eluted onto an ion-exchange analytical column for
separation and subsequent detection. The procedure
is effective when the trapping and elution steps are
quantitative, or at the very least, are reproducible.
There are two general hardware configurations for
automation of the trace enrichment procedure using
concentrator columns. These are a single-valve configuration; and a two-valve configuration. The former
is the simpler and consists of a single six-port,
high-pressure, switching valve and two pumps. A
measured volume of the sample is pumped onto the
concentrator column with the effluent directed to
waste. The pump itself can be used for large volumes
of sample, or an injector can be placed in line for
smaller volumes and a suitable sample loading
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
149
Table 1
Some recent applications of preconcentration
Sample
Species determined
Concentration
column
Type
Recovery
(%)
Detection
limit
Refs.
River water
mineral water
Semi-conductor
pure water
Beverages,
Mine waste water
Water
Sea water
Transition metals
Iminodiacetate
resin
Dionex TAC-LP1
Chelating resin
80–100
0.01–0.1 ppb
[22]
Anion exchange
N/A
,50 ppt
[114]
Nucleosil C 18
Reversed phase
N/A
5–40 ppb
[19]
Nucleosil C 18
Iminodiacetate
resin
LiChrospher 100
RP-18
Dionex Ion Pac
AG 10
LiChrospher 100
RP-18
Baker C 8 , C 18 , and
phenyl
Amberlite XAD-2 and
XAD-4
Reversed phase
Chelating resin
75–90
N/A
N/A
0.1–0.5 ng
[115]
[21]
IIR reversed-phase
coated with TBA
Anion exchange
72–95
15–150 ppb
[20]
90-100
0.3 – 5 ppb
[24]
IIR reversed-phase
coated with CTA
Reversed phase and
anion exchange
80
0.3 –8 ppb
[116]
20–100
2 ppb
[117]
Natural waters
Ozonated water
Tap water
Water
Anions
8-Hydroxyquinoline complexes
of Cu(II), Al(III), Fe(III)
Organic lead and mercury species
Zinc, copper, nickel, cobalt and
manganese
Plasmocorinth B complexes of
metals
Bromate
Benzene and naphthalene sulfonic
acid derivatives
Triorganotin compounds
mobile phase. The loading mobile phase must allow
the analytes to adsorb quantitatively onto the preconcentrator column. Rotation of the valve allows
the eluent to be pumped through the concentrator
column in the reverse direction in which the sample
was loaded (backflushing). The trapped analyte ions
are eluted from the concentrator column, and onto
the analytical column. The valve is then rotated
again and the eluent carries the solute ions through
the analytical column in the usual way.
The second approach is somewhat more flexible.
Two high-pressure switching valves and a single
programmable pump with a low-pressure solvent
selection valve are configured as in Fig. 2a. Again, a
measured volume of the sample is loaded onto the
concentrator column at a precise flow-rate, with the
effluent directed to waste (Fig. 2b). A wash step can
then be introduced without losing bound analytes by
switching the low-pressure solvent select valve to the
eluent flow path for a precisely measured time (Fig.
2c). This partially re-equilibrates the concentrator
column with the eluent to help minimise baseline
disturbances. The valves are then switched to backflush the analyte ions from the concentrator column
and onto the analytical column (Fig. 2d). This twovalve configuration offers the clear advantage of
unlimited and precise control over the volumes of
eluent for the washing and backflushing steps, allowing the possibility of tailoring the preconcentration
procedure for different samples.
The hardware configurations are now well developed for trace enrichment procedures, so the
emphasis in recent years has been placed on the
nature of the concentrator columns and the sample
loading conditions. Many types of packing materials
are available commercially for concentrator columns
including reversed-phase packings functionalised
with C 18 , C 8 , CN, etc, chelating resins, and both
anion- and cation-exchange resins. A recent example
of utilising reversed-phase concentrator columns was
for the analysis of trace levels of copper(II), aluminium(III) and iron(III) [22]. These metals were
complexed with 8-hydroxyquinoline, with introduction of the sample to the concentrator column
being performed using a sample loading mobile
phase of varying mixtures of acetonitrile and water.
A number of commercially available functionalised
packing materials with different particle sizes (10–
53 mm) were investigated and it was found that for
these types of neutral metal complexes, a C 18
functional group and small particle size (10 mm)
provided the best recoveries and subsequent ana-
150
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
Fig. 2. (a) Apparatus for sample preconcentration using a single pump, a low-pressure solvent selection valve (A), two-high pressure
switching valves (B, C), and a concentrator column (D). (E) The analytical column, (b) sample loading, (c) concentrator column washing,
(d) sample stripping. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [3].
lytical separation performances when loaded onto the
concentrator column with a loading mobile phase of
90:10 acetonitrile–water. Limits of detection were 5
ppb for Al(III), and 40 ppb for Cu(II) and Fe(III).
An advantage of using reversed-phase packing
materials is that they be modified with suitable ioninteraction reagents (IIR) in order to retain ionic
analytes. For example, Sarzanini et al. [116] coated a
C 18 pre-column with tetrabutylammonium hydroxide
as the IIR to successfully concentrate Plasmocorinth
B (a disulfonated azo dye) complexes of Co(III),
Cu(II), Fe(III), Ga(III), In(III), Ni(II), V(V) and
Zr(IV). The metal ions were complexed with Plasmocorinth B prior to loading a 100-ml sample
volume directly onto the pre-coated concentrator
column with the aid of a pump. Generally, greater
than 94% recoveries were obtained with detection
limits in the range of 15–150 ppb.
Preconcentration of some transition metals is also
possible using chelating resins. Caprioli and Torcini
[19] utilised an iminodiacetate chelating resin to
selectively trap copper(II), nickel(II), zinc(II), and
cobalt(II) in a seawater matrix. In such a sample, the
high ionic strength renders the use of ion-exchange
resins for preconcentration impractical. The use of
the chelating resin not only served to preconcentrate
the metal ions, but also eliminated analytical problems associated with the high ionic strength of the
matrix. After loading 100 ml of the sample seawater
solution, the pre-column was washed with 0.1 M
ammonium nitrate, before elution of the bound metal
ions onto the analytical column with 6 mM pyridine2,6-dicarboxylic acid. Sub ppb detection limits were
achieved. Motellier and Pitsch [115] also utilised an
iminodiacetate resin for the determination of transition metals and found that the sample pH was of
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
particular importance for good recovery of the metal
ions. pH values less than 2.8 resulted in partial
uptake of the metals by the chelating column, while
high pH values led to slower desorption kinetics.
Post-column detection with pyridylazoresorcinol
(PAR) resulted in detection limits of approximately
0.1 ppb.
Preconcentration of anions is usually achieved by
employing a suitable anion-exchange resin. However, most analyses of trace amounts of anions have
been restricted to samples that have a low ionic
strength [23]. The preconcentration of a trace analyte
in the presence of high levels of interfering ions
typically leads to overloading of the concentrator
column and poor recoveries of the target analytes.
Several methods have been devised to deal with
samples of this type, normally by coupling the
preconcentration procedure to a suitable matrix
elimination procedure. One approach which is suitable when the levels of interferences are only
moderate involves the on-line retention of the interferences on a suitable pre-column, and is typified by
the determination of bromate in ozonated drinking
water [24,25]. Relatively high levels of chloride,
which overloaded the anion concentrator column,
were removed on-line by utilising an ‘On-guard Ag’
(Dionex) cartridge (containing a cation-exchanger in
the silver form) which trapped chloride anions and
151
allowed bromate to pass through to the anion concentrator column unhindered. One drawback of this
approach was that silver leaching from the On-guard
Ag cartridge resulted in deterioration of the analytical column. This was overcome by utilising a
Dionex MetPac CC-1 metal trap column. The detection limit for bromate was approximately 1 ppb,
an order of magnitude lower than direct injection
methods.
When the levels of interferences are high, it is
impractical to retain them on-line because the required capacity of the pre-column would be very
high. Instead, concentrator columns may be used to
selectivity trap target anions with the interfering
matrix ions being directed to waste. One such
example was for the analysis of sulfite in a variety of
foods [26,27], wherein sulfite anions were bound to a
Dionex AS-2 anion-exchange cartridge, with the
bulk of the matrix eluted to waste. The bound sulfite
analyte was then eluted to the analytical column for
analysis. Any strongly retained compounds remaining on the concentrator column were removed with a
wash step consisting of concentrated eluent.
An on-line device for the automation of SPE
procedures for treating acidic or basic samples has
been reported recently [28]. This device (shown in
Fig. 3) is termed a ‘sample concentrator and neutraliser (SCAN) processor’ (Alltech Associates, Deer-
Fig. 3. The valve configuration for the SCAN 1000 sample processor. The shaded portion of the valve diagram represents the liquid
flowpath during sample neutralisation / concentration. The unshaded portion shows the liquid flowpath during sample analysis. Reproduced
with permission from Ref. [23].
152
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
field, IL, USA) and as the name suggests, is designed
for the on-line neutralisation of acidic or basic
samples and also the simultaneous preconcentration
of the analyte anions. The main components of the
system are an ion-exchange concentrator column and
an electrochemically regenerated ion neutraliser
(ERIN) column. The ERIN column operates on the
principle of an electrically polarised ion-exchange
resin (discussed later in Section 2.2.3), wherein an
electrolysis reaction is used to generate the hydroxide or hydronium ions necessary to regenerate
the anion- or cation-exchange resin in the cell. The
effluent from the detector is recirculated through the
system and carries the injected sample through the
ERIN cell where neutralisation takes place, and
thence to the concentrator column where the analyte
anions are retained. Rotation of the valve results in
the analytes being eluted from the concentrator
column to the analytical column.
A recent innovation in the field of SPE has been
the introduction of a disk format rather than a packed
bed column. The SPE discs have been used widely
for extracting environmental pollutants from aqueous
solutions [29–32] and offer some significant advantages over conventional packed bed columns. These
include large flow area, low bed masses and low
void volumes (10–50 ml) [33]. Furthermore, the
discs are not subject to channelling problems associated with conventional concentrator columns. So far,
SPE discs have been applied to off-line extraction of
phthalates and adipates [34], and the elimination of
matrix interferences [35,36] but have not as yet been
applied to any on-line preconcentration procedures
for IC. It is envisaged that the use of discs will
become more prevalent in the future, as the range of
packing materials is extended and the advantages of
a disc format become accepted more widely.
2.1.4. Sample clean-up using dialytic methods
Dialysis involves the diffusion of species across a
membrane and the technique can broken into two
classes, passive dialysis (in which molecules of a
certain molecular mass are transferred across a
membrane), and active (Donnan) dialysis (in which
ions of a specified charge are transferred across a
membrane). Active dialysis is employed most commonly in IC and is useful for the clean-up of sample
solutions at extreme pH. For example, highly al-
kaline samples often pose problems for analysis of
anions by IC, including distorted peaks, severe
baseline disturbances, system peaks and reduced
column life. A typical dialytic apparatus consists of a
length of cation-exchange membrane fibre immersed
in a suitable hydrogen ion-donating medium. The
membrane is usually functionalised with sulfonic
acid groups to impart cation-exchange characteristics
and Donnan dialysis occurs between the sample
solution on one side of the membrane and an acidic
solution on the other side. The sample can be
introduced by means of a syringe or pump and the
effluent either collected or transferred directly to the
injection loop of an IC instrument. As the sample is
passed through the fibre, sodium ions in the sample
are exchanged for hydrogen ions from the hydrogen
ion-donating medium. Analyte anions are prevented
from passing out of the fibre due to the repulsion of
the cation-exchange (negatively charged) membrane.
Laksana and Haddad [37] have investigated a
range of organic and inorganic acids as candidates
for the acid-donating medium. The ability to neutralise the sample improved with increasing concentration of the hydrogen ion-donating medium, but the
organic sulfonic acids showed superior performance
to the inorganic acids in terms of minimal incursion
of the acid anion into the sample solution. Octanesulfonic and camphorsulfonic acid gave best
results but could only be used up to a concentration
of 0.3 M if incursion of the acid anion was to be
prevented. Clean-up devices of this nature have a
finite life governed by the volume and concentration
of the hydrogen-donating solution and the total
neutralisation capacity can be expressed as the
volume of sample of known concentration that can
be treated. This capacity can be increased greatly
when the hydrogen ion-donating solution is replaced
by a slurry of high-capacity cation-exchange resin
(in the hydrogen form) and a dilute solution of
octanesulfonic acid. The resin provides a very largecapacity reservoir of hydrogen ions, whilst the
octanesulfonic acid acts as a carrier to move the
hydrogen ions to the membrane surface. Incursion of
the acid anion into the sample is prevented due to the
use of the bulky octanesulfonate anion.
Further refinement to active dialysis methods can
be achieved by applying electric fields with membranes, known as electrodialysis. A schematic for an
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
153
Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of the electrodialysis process. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [38]
electrodialytic process is shown in Fig. 4. Two sheets
of cation-exchange membrane are arranged in a stack
to form a three-compartment cell comprising separate chambers for anode, cathode and sample. The
anode chamber contains a hydrogen ion-donating
medium, the cathode chamber contains dilute NaOH
to act as a receiver, and the sample chamber is filled
with an alkaline sample containing target anions.
Application of a d.c. electric field causes cations,
particularly highly mobile Na 1 , to move from the
sample chamber to the cathode chamber. At the same
time hydrogen ions flow from the anode chamber
into the sample chamber. Anions are blocked from
moving between the chambers by the cation-exchange membrane. The net effect of the process is to
neutralise the sample. During electrodialysis, hydrogen ions are continually produced at the anode, so
the hydrogen ion-donating medium is not depleted as
the sample is neutralised.
Electrodialysis has been employed for the off-line
analysis of strongly alkaline samples containing trace
amounts of common inorganic anions [34]. Several
commercially available membranes were investigated
for their performance and most gave greater than
80% recoveries for strong acid anions, but in all
cases the recovery of fluoride was poor. This was
attributed to partial protonation of fluoride to form
neutral hydrofluoric acid which could then diffuse
through the membrane and out of the sample reservoir. The membrane that gave the best overall
performance was Asahi CMV (Asahi Glass, Japan).
Again, the best hydrogen ion-donating media were
found to be 2:1 (w / v) slurries of large organic
sulfonic acids (toluene sulfonic acid, octane sulfonic
acid, or camphor sulfonic acid) with Bio-Rad AG
50W-X8 (200–400 mesh, H 1 form) resin. Under
these conditions, 1 M NaOH sample solutions could
be neutralised in about 10 min without loss of strong
acid anions or incursion of the acid-donating medium
anion. However the device was unsuitable for the
electrodialysis of samples in which the target analytes were a weak acid, such as fluoride and nitrite,
due to loss of these ions from the sample.
The cell design shown in Fig. 4 can be modified to
allow on-line electrodialysis and direct injection onto
an IC instrument if a small volume, flow-through
sample reservoir is used. Such a flow-through device
has been reported in which the volume of the sample
154
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
compartment is 300 ml and membranes of large
surface area are employed [39]. When a Neosepta
CMS membrane was used, the recovery of fluoride
was improved dramatically when compared to the
static device. This was attributed to the production of
hydrofluoric acid occurring in the sample at the point
of exit from the cell, so the loss of fluoride due to
diffusion did not occur. However, the recovery of
nitrite was still poor. The on-line device was applied
to the analysis of fluoride in forage vegetation
samples. The samples were prepared by NaOH
fusion, and the prepared alkaline sample was injected
directly. The results obtained by IC compared
favourably with those obtained from a colorimetric
method.
Electrodialysis has also been used to neutralise
highly acidic solutions prior to determination of
magnesium(II) and calcium(II) [40]. The authors
utilised an electrodialysis device consisting of a
Tosoh TASN-80 anion-selective membrane tube (40
cm31 mm I.D.). The rest of the device was similar
in nature to the previous examples, except that
NaOH was used for the cathode chamber (to donate
OH 2 ions) and an acidic medium acted as the
receiver. The device was capable of neutralising 1 M
acid solutions within 10 min without loss of target
analytes.
2.1.5. Sample preparation using combustion
Combustion techniques are extremely useful for
preparation of samples in which heteroatoms can be
converted to ionic species suitable for determination
by IC. Combustion is, therefore, used frequently for
the determination of heteroatoms in the microanalysis of organic chemicals, as well as for the analysis
of oils and fuels. Normally the sample is combusted
in oxygen, during which some non-metallic elements
are converted into gaseous compounds which are
collected in a suitable absorbing solution for analysis
by IC.
Several experimental configurations are possible,
including the Schoeniger flask, the Parr oxygen
bomb, and furnace methods. The Schoeniger flask
consists of a pyrex or quartz vessel containing an
absorber solution and a small amount of sample (0.1
g) in a paper cup. The sample is then ignited
manually or electrically and the gaseous products are
collected in the absorber solution. A typical application is the analysis of chlorine, bromine and phosphorus in organic compounds [41] using a solution
of 30% (w / w) H 2 O 2 as the absorber. In the case of
phosphorus determination, it is necessary after combustion to boil the collected solutions to facilitate
hydrolysis reactions to convert the less oxygenated
oxyanions of phosphorus to orthophosphate in order
to simplify the analysis [42]. Larger samples (up to
1g) may be combusted in a Parr bomb combustion
apparatus using a high pressure of oxygen. Typical
applications of combustion bombs include elemental
analysis of chemical wastes [43,44], halogens and
sulfur in oil and solid organic chemicals [45,46].
Furnace methods are applicable to more intractable
samples, such as rocks and ores.
Due to the nature of the apparatus used, combustion techniques are most often employed off-line.
However, Andrew and co-workers [47] have reported an on-line combustion IC technique for the
determination of sub-ppm levels of sulfur and chlorine in liquid hydrocarbon samples. A twin-tube
furnace is used and the schematic layout of the
apparatus is shown in Fig. 5. The oxygen to be used
in the combustion is first purified by passage through
the furnace and then through three scrubber solutions. The sample is injected into a helium stream,
before being mixed with oxygen and combusted in
the furnace. The gaseous products are then trapped in
a bubbler and the absorbing solution passed through
a concentrator column for enrichment prior to IC
analysis. Recoveries of chlorine and sulfur from a
range of liquid hydrocarbons was close to 100% and
good agreement was obtained between results obtained by the combustion-IC method and microcoulometry.
2.2. Developments in IC separation methods
In cases where manipulation of separation selectivity or the application of sample treatment procedures do not provide the desired separation, it may
be necessary to employ a different separation technique. In the following section, developments in IC
separation methods which enhance the ability of the
technique to accommodate difficult samples are
discussed.
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
Fig. 5. Schematic diagram of the combustion-IC apparatus. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [43].
155
156
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
2.2.1. Matrix elimination IC
A novel solution to the problem of performing IC
separations on high ionic strength samples, such as
brines, has been to use the dominant matrix ion as
eluent. The principle of this method is that the
exchange sites on the stationary phase are equilibrated with the dominant matrix ion before introduction of the sample itself, which prevents additional binding of the dominant matrix ions from the
sample and, therefore, diminishes band-broadening
effects [48,49]. This approach is termed ‘matrix
elimination IC’ because the dominant matrix ion
passes through the column unretained.
Matrix elimination IC has been applied to a range
of sample types, but is used most frequently for the
analysis of brines. Here, a relatively high concentration of sodium chloride is used as the eluent and
the sample is injected without dilution. Fig. 6
demonstrates the utility of this approach by comparing the separation of the same group of anions in a
water matrix and in a matrix comprising 20 000 ppm
chloride. Retention times and peak shapes are virtually identical for the two chromatograms, showing
that the band-broadening resulting from self-elution
effects caused by the dominant matrix ion in the
sample have been almost eliminated. Matrix elimination IC has been applied also to samples containing
high levels of sulfate, using sodium sulfate as the
eluent.
2.2.2. New separation methods
When a conventional IC separation method encounters interference problems which cannot be
resolved by either systematic optimisation of the
eluent composition or by using a specialty ionexchange stationary phase, use of an alternative
separation mode may be desirable.
One example of a very difficult separation which
can be resolved in this way is the determination of
ionic species in acid rain. Here, the acidic anions,
chloride, nitrate and sulfate, must be determined in
the presence of monovalent and divalent cations,
such as sodium, ammonium, potassium, calcium and
magnesium. Although a range of approaches to this
separation have been proposed, such as the use of
two parallel separation systems or the use of a
coupled anion / cation IC system, Tanaka and coworkers [50–52] have developed an elegant method
which uses a weak acid (carboxylate) cation-exchange column coupled with a solution of a weak
Fig. 6. Separation of 10 anions in (a) water and (b) 20 000 ppm chloride. A Waters IC Pak A column was used and the eluent was 15 mM
sodium chloride containing 5 mM phosphate buffer at pH 6.5, 1.2 ml / min, U.V. detection at 210 nm, 10 – 50 ppm of each anion [48].
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
carboxylic acid (such as tartrate) as eluent and
employing conductivity detection. Under these conditions, the cation-exchange column operates in the
ion-exclusion mode for the separation of the anions
and in the cation-exchange mode for the separation
of the cations, with hydronium ion acting as the
competing cation. Fig. 7 shows a typical separation
obtained. This system has been incorporated into an
automatic acid rain analyser in which a rainfall event
triggers a collection of sample and subsequent
analysis, whilst a meteorological satellite provides
data on the source of the rain sample. The system
operates unattended and is in routine use for monitoring of acid rain in Nagoya, Japan.
Electrostatic ion chromatography (EIC), developed recently by Hu and co-workers [53–56], is a
separation method for inorganic anions which has
Fig. 7. Simultaneous IEC / CEC chromatogram of common anions
and cations on a TSKgel OA-PAK column by elution with a 5 mM
tartaric acid / 7.5% methanol / water. Eluent background conduc2
2
tivity: 537 mS cm 21 . Peaks: (1) SO 22
4 ; (2) Cl ; (3) NO 3 ; (4)
1
21
eluent-dip; (5) Na 1 ; (6) NH 1
;
(7)
K
;
(8)
Mg
;
(9)
Ca 21 .
4
Chromatographic conditions: eluent flow-rate, 1.2 ml / min; column temp., 268C; detector sensitivity, 100 mS cm 21 ; injection
volume, 0.1 ml; injected sample, mixture of 0.1 mM HNO 3 , KCl,
NH 4 NO 3 , (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , CaCl 2 , and MgCl 2. Reproduced with
permission from Ref. [51].
157
separation selectivity different to that of conventional
ion-exchange. In EIC, the stationary phase is formed
by coating an octadecyl reversed-phase material with
a hydrophobic zwitterionic surfactant, such as 3-(N,
N-dimethylmyristylammonio)propanesulfonate (Zwittergent-3-14) or 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS), both of
which are characterised by a hydrophobic tail and a
cation-exchange and an anion-exchange functionality
separated by three methylene groups. The resultant
coated material acts as a zwitterionic stationary
phase in which the two functional groups are situated
sufficiently closely that they exert simultaneous
electrostatic attraction and repulsion effects on analyte ions. The combined effects of the above result in
the achievement of an effective distribution of both
the analyte cations and anions from the electrical
fields (stationary phase) to the bulk solution (mobile
phase) without need for a displacing ion. Separations
can, therefore, be performed using water as eluent
and analyte ions are eluted as pairs of ions (that is,
each analyte anion is accompanied by an analyte
cation), with the retention time being determined by
the nature and charge of the anion and the cation.
When a mixture of analyte salts is injected, ion-pairs
comprising all possible combinations of the analyte
cations and anions are produced, with the distribution of cations and anions between the ion-pairs
being dependent on a priority order determined by
the molal energies (DG) of the cation and anion in
the ion-pair. A particular anion may, therefore, be
eluted as multiple peaks, being present as an ion-pair
with a range of different cations. The separation
selectivity is illustrated in Fig. 8 (upper trace), from
which it can be seen that the elution order differs
substantially from that evident in IC.
Although the use of water as eluent is of great
advantage to the achievement of high conductivity
detection sensitivity, the fact that the analyte ions are
eluted as ion-pairs having a composition dependent
on the nature and concentration of the sample has
obvious drawbacks in analytical applications since
the chromatogram would be dependent on the sample
composition. A recent development in EIC has
overcome this problem. It has been reported that the
addition of a low concentration of an electrolyte to
the eluent resulted in all analyte anions being eluted
as single peaks consisting of an ion-pair of the
158
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
Fig. 8. EIC chromatograms of inorganic anions using water (upper trace) or 10 mM NaHCO 3 (lower trace) as eluent. Column, ODS
modified with C14N3S; flow-rate, 1.0 ml / min; detection, suppressed conductivity; sample, 100 ml of a solution containing 1.0 mM (upper
trace) or 0.1 mM (lower trace) of each anion. The peak due to thiocyanate in the lower trace was eluted at a retention time of 378 min. Peak
identities: (1) sulfate; (2) chloride; (3) nitrite; (4) bromide; (5) nitrate; (6) chlorate; (7) iodide; and (8) thiocyanate. Reproduced with
permission from Ref. [57].
analyte anion with the eluent cation [53]. That is, the
cations in the sample did not influence the final
chromatogram. Use of sodium bicarbonate as the
eluent permitted the EIC separation to be performed
in conjunction with a conventional IC suppressor. In
this way, the high detection sensitivity obtained with
water eluents was maintained, as was the unique
separation selectivity of EIC. Fig. 8 (lower trace)
shows a separation of inorganic anions performed by
suppressed EIC using sodium bicarbonate as mobile
phase.
In evaluating the effects of adding an electrolyte to
the mobile phase in EIC, it was observed that the
first addition of electrolyte caused substantial
changes in retention times, but subsequent higher
concentrations of electrolyte caused little further
change. For example, the chromatogram obtained
with 10 mM NaHCO 3 as mobile phase was almost
the same as that obtained using 200 mM NaHCO 3 .
This behaviour is quite different from that occurring
in conventional ion exchange and demonstrates
further that EIC operates under a different mechanism to that of ion exchange. The tolerance of the
separation to changes in the electrolyte concentration
in the mobile phase suggests that this form of EIC
should be applicable to the determination of trace
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
anions in samples of high ionic strength. This
application has been investigated and UV-absorbing
analyte anions have been determined successfully in
seawater using a dilute synthetic seawater as the
mobile phase [58]. This approach is clearly similar in
concept to matrix elimination IC which was discussed earlier.
2.2.3. Electrically polarised ion-exchange resins
Hydroxide eluents in IC have hitherto found only
limited use because of the difficulty in avoiding
carbonate contamination in preparing and using
eluents of this type. The ready absorption of carbon
dioxide to form carbonate means that the true eluent
composition is rarely known accurately, and poor
reproducibility of the retention times results. Electrolytic generation of hydroxide eluents has been
recently developed wherein water is used as the feed
to the electrolysis cell and potassium counter ions are
added from an external supply via a cation-exchange
membrane to give a very pure solution of potassium
hydroxide [59]. Carbonate contamination does not
occur to any appreciable extent since the eluent does
not come into contact with the atmosphere. Variation
of the current flowing through the electrolysis cell
can be used to control the strength of the eluent and
gradients can be generated by applying a predetermined current–time profile to an electrolysis cell
supplied with a constant stream of water as feed. In
this way, an isocratic pump can be used in a
gradient-IC system. The ability to use hydroxide
eluents in a reliable manner has meant that samples
containing high levels of hydroxide present less of a
separation problem because the anion-exchange sites
on the column are already equilibrated with hydroxide, so there is less perturbation caused by the
introduction of a high pH sample than would occur
for eluents of different composition. This process of
electrolytic eluent generation has been commercialised as the Dionex EG40 Eluent Generator, which
can also be used to electrolytically produce
methanesulfonic acid eluents for the separation of
cations.
The use of electrically generated eluents has
sparked an increase in interest in the use of electric
fields in ion-exchange separations, particularly the
use of polarised ion-exchange beds. This has formed
159
the basis of some major developments in IC which
have broadened the range of samples to which the
technique may be applied. Small and co-workers
have designed so called ‘ion-reflux devices’ in which
an electrical field is applied longitudinally along a
packed-bed cation-exchange column in the potassium
form using porous flow-through metal electrodes,
with water being passed through the column [60].
The electrolysis reaction occurring at the anode
produces hydronium ions which, when carried by the
flowing water stream, displace potassium ions from
the resin, which then combine with hydroxide produced by the electrolysis reaction at the cathode to
produce a potassium hydroxide eluent. In an alternative configuration, the flowing water phase passes
not through the packed-bed, but over a cation-exchange membrane which is in contact with the ionexchange bed. This is illustrated in Fig. 9, which
shows that the potassium hydroxide produced in the
eluent generator is passed through an injector and a
separator column (where analyte ions are separated),
and the effluent from the separator column is then
returned to the ion-reflux device where the potassium
hydroxide eluent is suppressed to water, thereby
allowing sensitive conductimetric detection of the
analyte anions. In this way, the ion-reflux device
serves the dual purposes of eluent generation and
eluent suppression. Such a system opens the possibility of an eluent recycling system in which IC is
performed simply by circulating water through the
ion-reflux device.
In practice, eluent recycling can be achieved by
using two electrically polarised resin beds, arranged
as in Fig. 10 [57]. Here, the resin beds are of
identical size and each is fitted with a pair of porous
metal electrodes. At the start of the separation, each
bed is roughly half in the hydronium form and half
in the potassium form. The upper bed is electrically
polarised and functions as the eluent generator,
whilst the lower bed is electrically passive and
functions as the suppressor. At the end of the
chromatographic run, the upper bed has become
partially depleted in potassium ions, whilst the lower
bed has become partially depleted in hydronium
ions. If the roles and positions of the two beds are
now reversed, and their orientations to the direction
of flow of water are also reversed, the system has
been re-established to its condition before the in-
160
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
Fig. 10. The basis of eluent recycling. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [61]
Fig. 9. An IRD-2 in an IC system. The solid black rectangle
represents the cation-exchange membrane separating the resin bed
from the cathode compartment. Reproduced with permission from
Ref. [56].
jection of sample. This reversal can be accomplished
with the aid of appropriately configured switching
valves [57]. Injection of a new sample can then
proceed and the whole cycle can be repeated. If the
ion-exchange beds have sufficient capacity, several
samples may be analysed before the roles of the beds
are reversed.
Electrically polarised ion-exchange resins have
also been used to maintain continuous operation of
an IC system using solid-phase suppressors [62]. In
this case, two small ion-exchange beds (in the
hydronium form) fitted with electrodes are used (Fig.
11). A sodium hydroxide eluent (not produced by
electrolysis) is supplied to the separator column and
is then suppressed by passage through one of the
resin beds which is not electrically polarised. The
effluent (water) is passed to the second bed (which is
electrically polarised) and the electrolysis reaction
brings the resin completely to the hydronium form.
The two beds are then reversed, so that the bed
which was formerly used as the suppressor (and
therefore contains some sodium from the eluent)
now becomes electrically polarised and is regenerated, whilst the other, fully regenerated bed now
becomes the suppressor. In this way, a fresh suppressor is used for each injection and potential problems
caused by using a partially regenerated suppressor
are avoided. In addition, the ion-exchange beds used
are physically very small, so that band-broadening
effects do not occur. This system has been commercialised by Alltech Associates as the ‘Electrically
Regenerated Ion Suppressor (ERIS)’ method.
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
161
Fig. 11. Suppression and electrochemical regeneration during (a) anion analysis and (b) cation analysis. Cell ‘A’ suppresses the eluent while
cell ‘B’ is electrochemically regenerated. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [58].
3. Capillary electrophoresis (CE) for inorganic
analysis
Most of the applications of CE to the determination of inorganic species involve the injection of
free ions and their separation by conventional free
zone capillary electrophoresis using a fused-silica
capillary, an in-line UV–Vis absorbance detector,
and using hydrostatic injection. Detection is frequently accomplished by indirect absorbance techniques. The separation of inorganic anions and
cations will be discussed below, but once again, the
separation of organometallic species or metal chelates will not be included. As was the case for IC, it
will be assumed in the ensuing discussion that the
sample preparation methods outlined in Section 3.1
162
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
are intended for use with a conventional instrument,
with any newer developments in separation techniques being discussed separately in Section 3.2.
3.1. Sample preparation for CE
3.1.1. Introduction
It is interesting to note that the samples which
presented the most difficulty in IC are also difficult
to analyse by CE. These samples are those containing a high-ionic strength matrix, whether this be
caused by high concentrations of an electrolyte or by
elevated acidity or basicity. These types of samples
cause problems in CE in several ways. First, the high
ionic strength imparts a low electrical resistance,
which interferes with the sample stacking process
leading to loss of the very high separation efficiency
usually encountered in CE. Analyte peaks often
become very broad and of poor shape. Second, the
electroosmotic flow (EOF) in the capillary can be
altered by the influence of the sample matrix,
especially as a result of changes in the degree of
ionisation of silanol groups on the wall of the
capillary. Third, the detector baseline is usually
perturbed when the pH of the sample differs greatly
from that of the background electrolyte (BGE). This
particular aspect is discussed in more detail in
Section 3.2.1.
There are some fundamental differences in the
tolerance of IC and CE to high-ionic strength
matrices. In IC it was a feasible option to dilute the
sample (to negate the deleterious effects of the
matrix) and to then rely on the high sensitivity of
conductivity detection to establish a suitable analysis. In CE this is not an attractive approach because
the detection sensitivity of indirect absorbance detection is not very high. On the other hand, high
levels of acids and bases are often more easily
accommodated in CE than IC. The reason for this is
that hydronium and hydroxide ions each have very
high electrophoretic mobilities in comparison to
inorganic anions and cations, so it is possible to
arrange the experimental conditions such that these
species migrate rapidly through the capillary and are
eliminated prior to the arrival of the analyte ions at
the detector. If the BGE is designed to be relatively
insensitive to pH changes and data collection is
delayed until the interferences have passed, a rela-
tively clean electropherogram often results. However, the success of this approach is limited to
specific applications and the ensuing discussion will
elaborate on a wider range of techniques for sample
handling and separation which broaden the applicability of CE to the determination of inorganic
species.
3.1.2. Manipulation of separation selectivity in CE
The opportunities for varying the separation selectivity in CE are rather limited in comparison to IC,
and this is especially true for the separation of
inorganic anions. Some of the more useful approaches to the manipulation of separation selectivity
for inorganic analytes are discussed below, but the
interested reader is referred to two recent reviews
dealing with this subject [63,64]. The discussion will
be limited to those approaches which enhance the
tolerance of the separation to complex matrix compositions.
Selectivity effects in CE arise from three main
sources, namely chemical parameters, instrumental
parameters, and from the capillary itself. Of these,
the chemical effects are by far the most significant
and are caused by changes to the nature of the
analyte (e.g. through solvation, complexation or ionpairing effects), or by specific chemical interactions
between the analyte and the BGE. The effective
mobilities of inorganic anions have been found to be
dependent on the nature and concentration of an
organic solvent added to the BGE. These effects
have been attributed to changes in the solvation
volume or pKa of the analyte, which in turn alter the
charge:mass ratio of the analyte [65,66]. The type
and concentrations of organic solvents used vary
widely and the choice depends on the effect of the
solvent on detection, baseline noise, miscibility with
the BGE, etc. However, aliphatic alcohols, acetonitrile and tetrahydrofuran are used commonly.
To rapidly separate inorganic anions by CE,
cationic surfactants (or EOF ‘modifiers’) are usually
included in the BGE to reverse the EOF flow so that
it moves in the same direction as the migrating
anions. The presence of the surfactant offers a
further opportunity for the manipulation of selectivity and this aspect has been reviewed recently [67].
Typical EOF modifiers are hydrophobic quaternary
ammonium salts, such as tetradecyltrimethyl-
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
ammonium bromide (TTAB), dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB), and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). The effect of the
length of alkyl chain on the surfactant on separation
selectivity of inorganic anions has been studied by
Buchberger and Haddad [68], who showed that
analyte ions which were prone to ion-pairing effects
(such as thiocyanate and iodide) gave decreased
relative migration times with increasing size of the
alkyl chain. The concentration of the cationic surfactant in the BGE can influence the selectivity by a
similar mechanism, with ion-pairing being favoured
at higher concentrations of surfactant. In using this
parameter to manipulate selectivity, care must be
taken not to exceed the critical micelle concentration
of the surfactant since chromatographic partitioning
effects with the micelle might also play a part in the
separation. Ion-pairing effects are pronounced for
polarisable or lipophilic anions, but other anions also
show selectivity changes of this type. The reversal of
migration order between nitrite and sulfate with
increasing surfactant concentration has been indicated as being due to a greater ion-association
between the sulfate and the surfactant and the same
argument has been used for the selectivity change
between chloride and bromide at $0.6 mM CTAB or
$0.5 mM TTAB [69].
A further means to manipulate selectivity is to mix
two or more surfactants together and to seek a
selectivity in the mixed surfactant system that differs
from that obtained using the two component surfactants individually as the EOF modifier. This approach has been reported for binary mixtures of
DTAB and TTAB [70,71]. Selectivity changes were
evident for chloride, nitrite and fluoride as a function
of total surfactant concentration and the molar ratios
of the surfactants. Binary mixtures of cationic surfactants were used to simultaneously separate over 10
anions in Bayer liquor in 4 min [71]. This is
illustrated in Fig. 12, in which a standard mixture
separated using BGEs with single 2.6 mM DTAB
(Fig. 12a) and 2.6 mM TTAB (Fig. 12b) suffered
from poor resolution of bromate and nitrite from
their respective adjacent anions. By using a BGE
containing a binary mixture of 2.6 mM each of
DTAB and TTAB, the problems noted above were
eliminated (Fig. 12c). Finally, it should be noted that
there are some practical limitations to the use of
163
Fig. 12. Comparison of separations using DTAB and TTAB
singly and as binary mixtures. Conditions: (a) 2.6 mM DTAB, 5
mM chromate and pH 9.1 (sampling was in the hydrostatic mode
(10 cm for 30 s) and indirect UV at 254 nm was used for
detection; other conditions were as in Fig. 5); (b) 2.6 mM TTAB
(other conditions as in (a)). (c) BGE had 2.6 mM TTAB and 2.6
mM DTAB. Other conditions were as in (a). Anions: (1) system
(bromide); (2) chloride; (3) nitrite; (4) sulfate; (5) nitrate; (6)
fluoride; (7) bromate; (8) phosphate; and (9) carbonate. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [64].
surfactants in manipulating anion selectivity. CTAB
and TTAB are disadvantaged by limited solubility
and formation of insoluble ion-associates with some
BGE components. The useful pH range can also be
limited due to precipitation effects.
The separation selectivity in CE arises from the
differences in the electrophoretic mobilities of the
analytes. Whilst the mobilities of metal cations as
hydrated ions range from about 40310 29 m 2 V 21
s 21 (Li 1 ) to about 80310 29 m 2 V 21 s 21 (Rb 1 ), the
values for individual members of the main groups of
metal ions, such as lanthanides or transition metals,
are often very similar so that a separation of these
species would demand extremely high (or even
164
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
unattainable) efficiencies. The solution to this dilemma is the use of auxiliary ligands which introduce secondary equilibria into the separation through
the formation of complexes with the metal ions,
thereby leading to the achievement of substantial
changes in selectivity. For an analyte species present
in several forms which are in equilibrium with rapid
kinetics of interchange between the forms, the effective mobility of the analyte is defined as the weighted average of all the mobilities of each of the forms.
Metal ions are separated either as partial or fully
complexed species with the auxiliary ligand.
Utilisation of the partial complexation of the
analyte metal ion with a weakly complexing ligand
was first demonstrated in CE by Foret et al. [72] and
further studies on methods for manipulating the
separation selectivity of these systems followed.
Typical ligands have been 2-hydroxyisobutyric acid
(HIBA), tartrate, lactate or even crown ethers. Fig.
13 shows how this approach enables the simultaneous separation of several classes of metal ions (in
this case, alkali metals, alkaline earths, transition
metals and lanthanides) [11]. A different situation
occurs when utilising auxiliary complexing ligands
forming strong complexes with the metal ions. Since
most of the metal ion is complexed under all BGE
conditions, selectivity is not as easy to manipulate as
in the case of weakly complexing ligands. Apart
from minor factors influencing the selectivity, such
as solvation changes in various media, there are only
very few means to bring about a change in the
charge / mass value of the analytes (and consequently
a substantial change in selectivity). Typical ligands
forming strong metal complexes used for the separation of metal ions by CE include cyanide [73],
8-hydroxyquinoline-5-sulfonic acid (HQSA) [74],
Fig. 13. Separation of 27 alkali, alkaline earth, transition and rare earth metal ions in a single run using lactate as auxiliary ligand. Capillary,
fused-silica 75 mm I.D., 0.600 m length, 0.527 m to detector; BGE, 15 mM lactic acid, 8 mM 4-methylbenzylamine, 5% methanol, pH 4.25;
separation voltage, 30 kV; detection, 214 nm; injection, hydrostatic (30 s); sample, 1–5 ppm of each metal. Peak identification: (1) K 1 ; (2)
Ba 21 ; (3) Sr 21 ; (4) Na 1 ; (5) Ca 21 ; (6) Mg 21 ; (7) Mn 21 ; (8) Cd 21 ; (9) Li 1 ; (10) Co 21 ; (11) Pb 21 ; (12) Ni 21 ; (13) Zn 21 ; (14) La 31 ; (15)
Ce 31 ; (16) Pr 31 ; (17) Nd 31 ; (18) Sm 31 ; (19) Gd 31 ; (20) Cu 21 ; (21) Tb 31 ; (22) Dy 31 ; (23) Ho 31 ; (24) Er 31 ; (25) Tm 31 ; (26) Yb 31 ; (27)
Lu 31 . Reproduced with permission from Ref. [11].
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
165
Table 2
Equilibria utilised for governing the separation selectivity of cations (from Ref. [63])
Complexation mode
Source of separation selectivity
Examples of ligands
Partial
Complexation with the auxiliary ligand
HIBA, lactate, etc.
Total
Influence of the metal on the pKa of
ligand group
Dissociation of bound water molecules to
mixed hydroxo–ligand–metal complexes)
Ion-association (e.g. with TBA1 or
hexamethonium bromide)
IEEKC (ion-exchange electrokinetic
chromatography), e.g. with
poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride)
PAR [118]
and aminopolycarboxylic acid ligands such as EDTA
and CDTA [75,76].
Some generalised conclusions can be drawn about
the mechanisms which govern selectivity in separations of metal ions using auxiliary ligand and these
are summarised in Table 2. Significant selectivity
changes can be achieved by employment of complexation equilibria in the partial complexation
mode. In the total complexation mode, however, it is
usually not possible to govern the selectivity with
changes in ligand concentration since almost all of
the metal is usually complexed, and other mechanisms have to be utilised.
EDTA, CDTA
and analogues [80]
CN 2 [69]
EDTA [119]
3.1.3. General sample treatment
Real samples often require the application of
simple procedures such as sample extraction, filtration to remove particular matter, or dilution, prior to
the CE step and an on-line or at-line combination of
such procedure(s) with CE is desirable. Arce et al.
[77] used an FIA setup for on-line filtration of water
samples prior to the CE analysis (Fig. 14). They also
constructed a pump-driven unit for extraction and
filtration of soil samples combined with CE in an
at-line mode (automated sample transfer between the
pre-CE sample preparation step and the CE) [78].
The method was precise and four times faster
Fig. 14. Single FI system used for sample preparation / introduction in the CE system. IV, injection valve; SV, selecting valve; W, waste.
Reproduced with permission from Ref. [73].
166
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
compared to conventional methods of sample preparation off-line. Although such sample preparation
steps may be regarded as less sophisticated than
those to be discussed later, the importance of automated sample preparation for CE is undisputed and
is likely to grow in the future.
3.1.4. Electromigration sample preparation
techniques
Electromigration injection and stacking / transient
isotachophoresis (ITP) are sample handling methods
which are relatively easy to combine with CE as they
are implemented in the same capillary as for the CE
separation step. Electromigration injection appears to
be a straightforward procedure but is known to suffer
severe matrix-dependence effects [79] and therefore
its use for real samples is very limited. Although
several authors have reported its use for analyte
preconcentration in inorganic analysis [63,80], the
robustness of such methods for samples of varying
composition is questionable. Stacking of analyte ions
in a hydrostatically injected large sample plug is
another method mostly used for sample preconcentration and is again performed in the CE separation
capillary. While there have been numerous papers
and the reader is referred to some excellent reviews
on this topic [81–85], applications in inorganic
analysis are mostly in the area of preconcentration of
dilute samples (typically water) having much lower
conductivity than the electrolyte by exploiting the
field amplification effect (e.g. Refs. [59,76]).
A somewhat specialised area of sample stacking is
those methods utilising an on-capillary derivatisation
reaction between the analyte(s) and a reagent either
contained within the electrolyte or injected in a plug
next to the sample plug, with the derivatised analyte(s) forming a sharp zone at the start of the CE
separation [86]. In inorganic analysis, this approach
can be applied to determination of metal ions as
complexes formed on-capillary between oppositely
migrating metal cations and ligand anions converging and reacting at the boundary between the injected
sample plug and the BGE [59]). Reagan et al. [87]
demonstrated this approach for four divalent metal
complexes with PAR in which a plug of 1 mM PAR
was first injected into the capillary and then electromigration injection from a sample without added
ligand was performed (illustrated schematically in
Fig. 15). This method with an optimised stacking
procedure offered detection limits in the range of 10
nM. Macka et al. [88] utilised stacking by on-capillary complexation for the determination of Ba(II)
and Sr(II) in waters using on-capillary complexation
with sulfonazo(III) and for on-capillary complexation and stacking of lanthanides and U(VI) using a
BGE containing citrate and arsenazo(III) [89]. In the
latter case, the peak shapes for lanthanides were the
same for 100- and 10-s hydrostatic injections (Fig.
16) but the peak of the kinetically inert U(VI)
complex was split, which illustrates the problems
encountered in CE of metal ions and complexes due
to the kinetics of complex formation and dissociation
[59]). Finally, Haumann and Baechman [90] developed an interesting two-step on-capillary complexation method. At the start of the run, first a zone
of EDTA was injected as a 1 mM plug from the
injection cathodic side, then metal cations were
introduced at the detector side (anodic) and were
separated in a partial complexation mode with
tartrate present in the BGE, and finally the zones of
the metal cations came into contact with the EDTA
Fig. 15. Schematic diagram of stacking with on-capillary complexation; mep is the electrophoretic mobility. Reproduced with permission
from Ref. [81].
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
167
Fig. 16. Electropherograms of separations of U(VI) and 14 lanthanides using a 10-s injection of a standard solution containing 10 mM of
each metal (except 20 mM for Tm(III), Yb(III) and Lu(III)) and a 100-s injection of that standard solution 103 diluted. Capillary, FS
0.600030.520 m, pre-run dynamically modified with CW20M; injection, hydrostatic (10 s, 100 mm) of a standard solution containing 10
mM of each metal. BGE: 0.025 mM A(III) in 15 mM citric acid and 20 mM Tris (pH 4.3); separation voltage, 230 kV (30 mA); separation
voltage, 230 kV (39 mA); temperature, 258C; detection, LED 654 nm; injection of a standard solution containing 10 mM of each metal
(except 20 mM for Tm(III), Yb(III) and Lu(III)) in 10 mM HNO 3 . Reproduced with permission from Ref. [83].
zone and formed stable EDTA complexes which then
migrated to the detector.
Capillary isotachophoresis (CITP) has been coupled with CE by Blatny et al. [91] who determined
Fe(III) in water after pre-capillary complexation with
EDTA. The purpose of the CITP step was to enable
a large sample volume to be used and to permit a
sharp zone of Fe(III) to be formed and transferred to
the CE capillary for separation. This work serves as
a good example of problems which can be encountered when stacking large sample volumes, as
elevated blank levels due to impurities in reagents
adversely influenced the detection limit (10 ppb). A
general remark on the applicability of CITP-CE for
sample cleanup is that the mobility of the analyte(s)
should differ from the matrix ion(s) to be removed,
and for such cases some new applications in inorganic analysis can be expected.
3.1.5. Chromatographic sample preparation
Off-line methods of sample cleanup and preconcentration for CE have been reported. Kuban et al.
([92]) used a supported liquid membrane with a
cationic ion-pairing reagent to create a liquid anionexchanger for preconcentration of negatively charged
metallo-cyanide complexes. Enrichment factors between 50 and 600 were achieved. Fritz et al. [93]
have discussed the use of ion-exchange and chelating
resins to preconcentrate metal ions prior to CE
determination. They pointed to the limited usefulness
of non-selective ion-exchange methods in contrast to
the selective preconcentration of heavy metals using
chelating (iminodiacetate or dithiocarbamate) resins,
or formation of metal chelates with an excess of the
reagent, followed by adsorption of the chelate on a
hydrophobic column.
Although there are many examples of chromato-
168
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
graphic sample treatment procedures coupled on-line
with IC, this is not the case for CE. The preconcentration of heavy metals loaded onto a Chelex resin
column shown in Fig. 14 before being eluted with an
acid and automatically transferred into the CE is a
rare example [73]. Given the recent research activity
in the area of in-line (where a plug of adsorbent is
inserted in the CE capillary) or on-line (where the
effluent from a chromatographic column is sampled
into the CE capillary) coupling of chromatographic
sample cleanup and preconcentration techniques
[85,94–96], new developments in the area of inorganic analysis can be expected.
3.1.6. Sample preparation using dialysis
Dialysis and electrodialysis have been used extensively as an on-line sample preparation for IC, and
for both high- and low-molecular-mass organic
analytes, dialysis has also been used in on-line
combination with CE. The dialysis methods used
with CE range from microdialysis (including in vivo)
[97,98] over-sampling into a CE capillary through a
permeable membrane in a flow-through sampling
jacket introduced by Bao and Dasgupta [99], to
electrodialysis devices [100–102]. Kuban and Karlberg [103] presented an example of a dialysis / FIA
sample cleanup system on-line coupled to a CE (Fig.
17). A number of anions were analysed in a variety
of samples with complex matrixes, such as milk,
juice, slurries or liquors from the pulp and paper
industry. Despite the limited attention devoted
hitherto to dialysis and electrodialysis combined online with CE, these approaches have good potential
for application to inorganic analysis and developments in this area can be anticipated.
3.2. Developments in CE separation methods
As for IC, this section discusses some of the
developments in CE separation methods which enhance the ability of the technique to accommodate
difficult samples of the types described earlier.
3.2.1. High-ionic strength BGEs
Samples of high ionic strength are problematic in
CE due to the loss of sample stacking effects caused
by the low electrical resistance of the sample plug,
resulting in broadening of peaks and poor separation.
Fig. 17. Schematic diagram of the FIA–CE system used for on-line sample dialysis: (S) sample, (A) acceptor stream, (E) electrode, (M)
dialysis membrane, (D) UV detector. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [97].
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
In IC one of the approaches used for separating
samples of high ionic strength was to use the
dominant sample ion as the eluent ion, thereby preequilibrating the stationary phase functional groups
with the dominant sample ion and, therefore, preventing further adsorption of this ion when the
sample is injected. This technique, known as matrixelimination IC, was discussed earlier in Section
2.2.1.
An analogous approach in CE would be to use the
dominant matrix ion as a BGE component, but to
ensure sample stacking, the BGE would need to be
of high ionic strength. It is commonly thought that
even a moderately high ionic concentration in the
BGE would be impractical due to Joule heating
effects, leading to poor peak shapes. However, recent
studies [104] have shown that a BGE containing up
to 5 M sodium chloride can be used for the determination of UV-absorbing inorganic anions in a
sample containing up to 0.5 M of a salt. In these
studies, progressively higher concentrations of sodium chloride were added to a BGE buffered with
169
borate and it was found that a sample made up in
water gave good peaks for the constituent analyte
anions when the BGE contained 220 mM NaCl (Fig.
18). Under these conditions the full power of the
instrument was applied, leading to an internal temperature inside the capillary of 498C, which was
insufficient to cause band dispersion through heating
effects. Further increases in the concentration of
NaCl in the BGE caused no increase in temperature
because the separation current was reduced automatically. It was also noted that the addition of salt
to the BGE resulted in suppression of the electroosmotic flow, so that anion separations could be
undertaken without the need to add a surfactant EOF
modifier to the BGE.
When applied to the determination of anions in
seawater (which is approximately 0.5 M in NaCl), a
BGE of 1.5 M NaCl provided good sample stacking
and acceptable peak shapes for an undiluted sample
of seawater. In the general application of high salts
BGEs, it was recommended that the BGE be maintained at a salt concentration three times higher than
Fig. 18. CE separation of 10 inorganic anions. Capillary, 50 mm I.D., 33 cm length; carrier electrolyte, 10 mM borate, 220 mM NaCl, pH
8.5 adjusted by NaOH; sampling time, 40 s; voltage, 210 kV; wavelength for detection, 214 nm. Peaks: (1) Br 2 (10 ppm); (2) NO 2
2 (20
ppm); (3) S 2 O 32 (80 ppm); (4) NO 32 (2 ppm); (5) N 32 (40 ppm); (6) Fe(CN) 642 (20 ppm); (7) MoO 422 (40 ppm); (8) WO 22
(40 ppm); (9),
4
CrO 32
(40 ppm); (10) ReO 2
x
4 (40 ppm). Reproduced with permission from Ref. [98].
170
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
that of the sample in order to preserve sample
stacking.
3.2.2. Buffering of BGEs
It is noteworthy that many of the BGEs used in
early published separations of inorganic species by
CE were unbuffered. This characteristic meant that
the separations developed were often very intolerant
of even minor changes in sample composition.
Moreover, electrolysis effects occurring at the separation electrodes caused large changes in pH in both
the inlet and outlet electrolyte vials, and these pH
changes were shown to enter the capillary through
both electromigration and pH effects. Macka et al.
[105] have shown that pH changes of .2.5 pH units
could be introduced into the separation capillary
within 3 min of applying the separation voltage,
depending on the relative positions of the capillary
and the electrode in the inlet BGE vial. When the tip
of the capillary was positioned above the end of the
electrode, the pH of an unbuffered BGE changed
rapidly during the separation, but this effect was very
much diminished when the tip of the capillary was
positioned at least 1 mm below the end of the
electrode. The importance of buffering of the BGE
can be illustrated by reference to Fig. 19, which
shows the separations obtained with an unbuffered
chromate BGE (the most commonly employed BGE
for the determination of inorganic anions) and the
same BGE buffered with Tris when the sample
contained 50 mM NaOH [100].
In view of the fact that most inorganic anions and
cations do not absorb appreciably in the UV region,
indirect absorbance detection is used widely. In this
detection mode, a UV-absorbing co-ion (called the
probe) is added to the BGE and detection is effected
by the absorbance change caused when the migrating
band of analyte ions displace the probe ions from the
BGE in accordance with the Kohlraush Regulating
Function. This detection mode places particular
demands on the approach used to buffer the BGE
since the addition of any buffer ions having the same
Fig. 19. Electropherograms obtained with buffered (a), and unbuffered (b) chromate electrolytes after injection of solutes in an alkaline
matrix. Conditions: separation voltage, 220 kV; indirect detection at 254 nm; hydrostatic injection at 10 cm for 10 s; temperature, 258C;
sample, 0.1 mM of each anion in 50 mM sodium hydroxide. Key: (1) chloride; (2) sulfate; (3) nitrate; (4) chlorate; (5) phosphate; (6)
carbonate. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [106].
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
charge as the probe can establish competitive displacement processes with the analyte ions, leading to
loss of detection sensitivity. System peaks may also
be produced in these circumstances.
There are two main approaches to buffering of
BGEs for indirect detection which minimise the loss
of detection sensitivity and the appearance of system
peaks. Firstly, the probe itself or its counter-ion can
be used to provide buffering, for example use of
phthalate as the probe or the use of Tris as the
counter-cation for chromate BGE (see Fig. 19). The
disadvantage of this approach is that the concentration of the probe is normally kept low, so the
probe or its counter-ion normally cannot alone
provide sufficient buffering. Secondly, an ampholyte
could be used as a buffer, provided that it exists in a
zwitterionic form with zero overall charge. In this
form it will not act as a competing co-ion nor will it
increase the conductivity of an electrolyte. The
buffering capacity of an ampholyte depends on how
close together the pKa values of its buffering groups
are to the isoelectric point, and there are few
ampholytes which are effective buffers. However,
Doble et al. have demonstrated the use of lysine and
glutamic acid as ampholytic buffers for inorganic
separations [107].
3.2.3. New CE preparation methods
It is instructive to examine the separation selectivities achieved by IC and CE under standard
conditions, as revealed by the elution or migration
order of common analytes. In the case of IC, anions
are eluted in the following order of retention times:
2
2
32
22
2
F 2 , Cl 2 , NO 2
2 , Br , NO 3 , PO 4 ,SO 4 ,I .
However, the migration times of these species in
co-EOF CE are Br 2 ,Cl 2 ,SO 422 ,NO 22 ,I 2 ,
NO 32 ,F 2 ,PO 432 and in counter-EOF CE are F 2 ,
32
2
2
2
22
2
2
PO 4 ,NO 3 ,I ,NO 2 ,SO 4 ,Cl ,Br . These
sequences show that the selectivities of each of the
three techniques are quite different. A similar pattern
emerges when the same comparison is made for
inorganic cations for which the IC retention times
1
21
follow the order Li 1 ,Na 1 ,NH 1
,
4 ,K ,Mg
21
21
21
Ca ,Sr ,Ba , whilst migration times for co1
21
EOF CE are NH 1
,Sr 21 ,Ca 21 ,Na 1 ,
4 ,K ,Ba
21
1
Mg ,Li and for counter-EOF CE are Li 1 ,
Mg 21 ,Na 1 ,Ca 21 ,Sr 21 ,Ba 21 ,K 1 ,NH 41 . Complementary selectivities are again apparent.
171
These selectivities suggest that a mixed-mode
separation system in which the movement of analytes
is influenced both by electromigration effects and
ion-exchange interactions might provide a means to
manipulate selectivity in order to solve existing
separation problems. Such a mixed-mode separation
system can be created by adding an ion-exchange
stationary phase (or pseudo-stationary phase) to a
conventional CE capillary.
Capillary electrochromatography (CEC) can be
performed by packing the capillary with ion-exchange particles and the relative contributions of
ion-exchange and electromigration can be manipulated by varying the concentration of a competing
co-ion in the BGE. Thus a low concentration of
co-ion would results is a small degree of ion-exchange competition, so that ion-exchange interactions between the analyte and the stationary phase
would dominate retention. On the other hand, a high
concentration of competing co-ion would compete
effectively with the analyte ions for the exchange
sites on the stationary phase, so that the migration of
the analyte ions would be largely influenced by
electromigration effects (Fig. 20).
A similar approach involves using a soluble
pseudo-stationary phase, which has an advantage
over CEC in that the instrumental implementation is
straightforward (especially the lack of a need for
column packing and the construction of frits). Strong
interactions can be obtained with small additions of
pseudo-stationary phase to the electrolyte. Soluble
polymeric pseudo-stationary phases have been shown
to be ideal for influencing selectivity while still
providing high-efficiency separations. Krokhin et al.
[108] have used cationic polymers to introduce
interactions to influence the separation of metal
complexes of 4-(2-pyridylazo)resorcinol, and ionexchange interactions of free metal ions have been
reported by Buchberger et al. [109] who examined
the influence of adding an ion-interaction agent
(sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS)) to the electrolyte. For
divalent metals having a strong interaction with SDS,
it was demonstrated that the metals could be made to
migrate after the EOF, indicating the influence of
strong ion-pairing type interactions. Chromatographic particles can also be employed as a pseudostationary phase by using a suspension of the particles as the electrolyte. In the first demonstration of
172
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
Fig. 20. CEC of inorganic anions performed using an anion-exchange stationary phase. Conditions: column, 75 mm I.D., 34.5 cm total
length, 25-cm packed bed; stationary phase, 3-mm silica-based strong anion exchanger (Xtec Consultants); BGE, 10 mM sulfuric acid
titrated to pH 8.2 with Tris; separation voltage, 225 kV; electrokinetic injection, 210 kV for 10 s; concentration of each anion, 0.2 mM;
detection wavelength, 214 nm. Electropherogram courtesy of Emily Hilder.
¨
this technique Bachmann
et al. [110] used 1.5-mm
reversed-phase particles coated with SDS to separate
nine phenols. The surfactant was necessary to impart
some charge and consequently electrophoretic
mobility to the particles so that the analytes could be
separated by their selective interactions with the
stationary phase. Recently, studies have been undertaken using cation-exchange particles as a pseudostationary phase in capillary electrochromatography
of inorganic cations [111]. The influence of these
particles on the separation selectivity of alkali metals
and ammonium was determined to explore the
feasibility of using a combination of CE and IE
separation, and methods for switching between the
two separation modes, for the determination of these
cations. These analytes were chosen because their
1
1
elution order in IE (Li 1 ,Na 1 ,NH 1
4 ,K ,Rb ,
1
Cs ) is the nearly the reverse of their migration
order in CE conducted in the co-electroosmotic mode
1
1
1
(Rb 1 ,Cs 1 ,NH 1
[112].
A
4 ,K ,Na ,Li )
0.015% (w / v) suspension of sulfonated polystyrene–
divinylbenzene particles (particle size 225 nm) containing imidazole as an indirect detection probe was
used as BGE. The negative surface charge on the
particles imparts an electrophoretic mobility of
–25.46310 29 m 2 / Vs, so that these particles will,
therefore, migrate after the EOF in the co-EOF
mode. Evidence of the interaction of the metal ions
with the SPR will, therefore, appear as a reduction in
the observed electrophoretic mobility of the analytes.
Fig. 21 shows that this behaviour was observed and
that the predicted changes in the migration order
were also apparent. The migration order with no
pseudo-stationary phase was Cs 1 ,Rb 1 ,NH 41 ,
K 1 ,Na 1 ,Li 1 ; however, at a concentration of
0.015% of the suspension, the migration order was
1
1
1
1
1
NH 1
4 ,Rb ,K ,Cs ,Na ,Li .
4. Future trends
4.1. Comparison of IC and CE
Before attempting to outline the possible future
trends in IC and CE of inorganic ions, it is important
to recognise the fundamental differences between the
two techniques and their relative strengths and
weaknesses. CE and IC have been compared by
several authors [112,113], who have pointed out that
the two techniques differ in their stages of development, separation efficiency, separation selectivity (as
discussed in Section 3.2.3 above), analytical per-
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
173
Fig. 21. Change in electrophoretic mobility for monovalent analytes caused by increasing concentration of solid-phase reagent (SPR) added
to the BGE. Concentration of 3 relative units corresponds to a dilution of 1:1000 SPR added to the electrolyte. Conditions: 67.0 cm capillary
(60.5 cm to detector), 125 kV, indirect absorbance detection at 214 nm, 1 s injection at 0.5 p.s.i.. Electrolyte: 5 mM imidazole, 10 mM
MES, pH 6.15; sample, 2 mM of each metal ion. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [105].
formance characteristics, and applications. Some
discussion of these aspects is pertinent as a basis for
predicting future trends. It should be pointed out here
that this comparison is restricted to the mainstream
manifestations of each technique, namely ion-exchange separation and conductivity detection for IC,
and co-EOF separation with indirect absorbance
detection for CE.
It is readily apparent that IC and CE are at very
different stages of development. IC has been included in a number of standard methods of analysis
for regulatory purposes, whereas CE is less developed. This difference is particularly evident when
one considers the range of applications to which the
two techniques have been applied. IC is used for a
much wider range of samples than has CE and
enjoys a higher level of routine usage. It is interesting to note that the development of IC applications
has continued at a high rate for the past 5 years and
the number of new IC applications introduced over
this period far exceeds that for CE. There is little
evidence of an increase in CE applications which
might be expected if it was emerging as the potential
replacement for IC. However, the CE applications
commonly address a sample or analyte type which is
difficult to analyse using IC (e.g. the determination
of fluoride in Bayer liquor shown in Fig. 12), so the
two techniques are complementary in this respect.
A striking difference between the IC is the separation efficiency. If one uses the number of theoretical plates to quantify the efficiency (remembering
that the concept of a theoretical plate is not strictly
applicable to CE) then there is an approximate 50fold increase in efficiency between the two techniques in routine applications (4000 plates for a
15-cm IC column and 250 000 plates for a 50-cm CE
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
174
capillary). At first glance this increase in efficiency
would appear to endow CE with an enormous
advantage over IC. However, it is instructive to
examine the peak capacities (that is, the number of
peaks which can be baseline resolved in a given time
window) of each technique. To do this one must first
consider the manner in which efficiency varies over
the specified separation time window. In a typical IC
chromatogram the efficiency of successive peaks
reaches a fairly constant level for peaks with capacity factors in the range 2–10, and the peak capacity
calculated for the time window of 1–20 min is
approximately 32. Repeating this process for a
typical electropherogram obtained for CE shows that
a plot of the number of theoretical plates (N) versus
analyte mobility reaches a maximum when the
analyte mobility is close to that of the electrolyte.
When there is a difference between the mobilities of
the analyte and electrolyte, the peak shape is distorted leading to reduced values of N. The wide
variation in N over the electropherogram is in direct
contrast to that observed for IC and leads to the peak
capacity for CE being considerably less than one
would expect by consideration of the maximum
value of N alone. Choosing a time window of 5 min
for a co-EOF system, the peak capacity is approximately 88.
Table 3 summarises some of the analytical performance parameters of the mainstream IC and CE
methods and shows that IC is considerably more
sensitive than CE, but the techniques display similar
sensitivities if preconcentration (for IC) or electromigration injection (for CE) are employed. It should
be noted that preconcentration in IC usually also
results in the achievement of some selective sample
clean-up (see Section 2.1.3) which can permit it to be
applied to more complex sample matrices than is the
case for electromigration injection in CE. In terms of
precision, relative standard deviations (RSD) of 1%
or less are routinely achievable in IC, but precision is
somewhat worse for CE. Two factors contribute to
this. The first is that the migration time of an analyte
in CE is governed not only by the electrophoretic
mobility of the analyte but also by the mobility of
the EOF, and the second is the small magnitude of
the detection signal in CE due to the short light path
used. Signal-to-noise ratios are, therefore, smaller in
CE than in IC for similar analyte concentrations,
leading to the possibility for increased error in
measurement of peak areas.
The relative strengths and weaknesses of IC and
CE are summarised in Table 4. It can be seen that
the strengths of IC lie in the highly developed nature
of the technique, its broad applications base, and the
relative ease with which it can be applied to demanding analyses. It weaknesses relate to considerations
of speed, separation efficiency and costs of consumables, which are the same areas in which the
strengths of CE lie. Similarly, the weaknesses of CE
are generally in the aspects where IC is strong. Table
4 demonstrates clearly the complementarity of the
two techniques, which was also evident in the earlier
discussion of separation selectivity and applications.
4.2. IC and CE in the next millennium
The foregoing discussion allows some insight into
the future trends in IC and CE. Future developments
in IC might include further advances in sample
handling to extend the application of IC to more
complex samples, the development of new stationary
phases offering different separation selectivities to
those available currently, and the increased usage of
IC in hyphenated techniques. Miniaturisation and
increased portability of IC instrumentation will occur
and it is possible that research in building analytical
instruments on microchips will include work on IC.
Table 3
Some analytical performance parameters for IC and CE (from Ref. [106])
Parameter
IC a
CE b
Detection limit (direct sample injection)
Detection limit (sample preconcentration)
Precision
10 ppb, 50 ml
,1 ppb
1% RSD
200 ppb, 30 s
,1 ppb
3-5% RSD
a
b
Suppressed IC system, conductivity detection.
Indirect UV detection.
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
175
Table 4
Strengths and weaknesses of IC and CE (from Ref. [106])
Technique
Strengths
Weaknesses
IC
Broad range of applications
Well-developed hardware
Many detection options
Moderate speed
Moderate separation efficiency
Intolerance to some sample matrices
(e.g. high ionic strength)
High cost of consumables
Reliability (good accuracy, precision)
Accepted as standard methodology
Manipulation of separation selectivity
is simple
High sensitivity
CE
High speed
High separation efficiency
Good tolerance to sample matrices
(especially high pH)
Low cost of consumables
Finally, further development of expert systems and
computer-assisted optimisation packages for IC can
be expected, leading to increased commercial availability of such software.
Future directions in CE will address the weaknesses listed in Table 3. Stability and ruggedness of the
technique, especially for anions, will be improved
through the use of stable, bonded-phase capillaries.
Detection options will increase, particularly in the
areas of electrochemical detection (both amperometry and potentiometry), suppressed conductivity detection, and post-column reaction detection.
The hardware technology can be expected to improve and the range of applications will increase as
more scientists adopt CE as a routine tool for
inorganic analysis. Microchip technology for CE is
already a reality and is likely to be examined as a
tool for inorganic analysis. Finally, capillary electrochromatography, which can be considered to be a
hybrid of IC and CE and which combines the
advantages of both techniques, can be expected to be
applied to the ions of interest.
References
[1] H. Small, T.S. Stevens, W.C. Bauman, Anal. Chem. 47
(1975) 1801.
[2] W.R. Jones, P. Jandik, Am. Lab. 22 (1990) 51.
Instability and irreproducibility
of migration times and peak areas
Moderate sensitivity
Manipulation of separation selectivity
is difficult
Detection options are limited
Routine applications are limited
[3] P.R. Haddad, P.E. Jackson, in: Ion Chromatography: Principles and Applications, Journal of Chromatography Library,
Vol. 46, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990.
[4] J. Weiss, Ion Chromatography, 2nd ed, VCH, Weinheim,
1995.
[5] D.T. Gjerde, J.S. Fritz, in: 2nd ed, Ion Chromatography,
Heidelberg, Huthig, 1987.
[6] H. Small, in: Ion Chromatography, Plenum Press, New
York, 1989.
[7] O.A. Shpigun, Y. Zolotov, in: Ion Chromatography in Water
Analysis, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1998.
[8] J.G.E. Tarter, in: Ion Chromatography, Marcel Dekker,
New York, 1987.
[9] P. Jandik, G. Bonn, in: Capillary Electrophoresis of Small
Molecules and Ions, VCH, New York, 1993.
[10] W.R. Jones, P. Jandik, J. Chromatogr. 546 (1991) 445.
[11] Y. Shi, J.S. Fritz, J. Chromatogr. 640 (1993) 473.
[12] N.J. Benz, J.S. Fritz, J. Chromatogr. A 671 (1994) 437.
[13] P.E. Jackson, P.R. Haddad, Trends Anal. Chem. 12 (1993)
231.
[14] P.A. Fagan, P.R. Haddad, J. Chromatogr. 550 (1991) 559.
[15] J.E. Madden, P.R. Haddad, J. Chromatogr. A 829 (1998)
65.
[16] J.E. Madden, N. Avdalovic, P.E. Jackson, P.R. Haddad, J.
Chromatogr. A 837 (1999) 65.
[17] J.E. Madden, P.R. Haddad, J. Chromatogr. A (1999) (in
press).
[18] J. Havel, J.E. Madden, P.R. Haddad, Chromatographia
(1999) (in press).
[19] E. Ryan, M. Meaney, Analyst 117 (1992) 1435.
[20] C. Sarzanini, G. Sacchero, M. Aceto, O. Abollino, E.
Mentasti, J. Chromatogr. 640 (1993) 127.
[21] R. Caprioli, S. Torcini, J. Chromatogr. 640 (1993) 365.
[22] S. Motellier, H. Pitsch, J. Chromatogr. A 739 (1996) 119.
176
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
[23] P.E. Jackson, P.R. Haddad, in: Approaches to the Ion
Chromatographic Preconcentration of Environmental Samples, Century International, Franklin, MA, 1990.
[24] R.J. Joyce, H.S. Dhillon, J. Chromatogr. A 671 (1994) 165.
[25] H. Weinberg, J. Chromatogr. A 671 (1994) 141.
[26] S.R. Villasenor, J. Chromatogr. 602 (1992) 155.
[27] T. Okamoto, A. Isozaki, H. Nagashima, Bunseki Kagaku 45
(1996) 865.
[28] R.M. Montgomery, R. Saari-Nordhaus, L.M. Nair, J.M.
Anderson, J. Chromatogr. A 804 (1998) 55.
[29] T.S. Thompson, L. Morphy, J. Chromatogr. Sci. 33 (1995)
393.
[30] K.Z. Taylor, D.S. Waddell, E.J. Reiner, K.A. MacPherson,
Anal. Chem. 67 (1995) 1186.
[31] J.A. Field, K. Monohan, J. Chromatogr. A 741 (1996) 85.
[32] W. Liu, H.K. Lee, Talanta 45 (1998) 631.
[33] R.E. Majors, D.D. Blevins, S.K. Schultheis, LC?GC 12
(1994) 15.
[34] Anon, Supelco Appl. 55 (1994) 1994.
[35] R. Saari Nordhaus, L.M. Nair, J.M. Anderson, J. Chromatogr. A 671 (1994) 159.
[36] Anon, Alltech Sep. Sci. Today 2 (1997) 2.
[37] S. Laksana, P.R. Haddad, J. Chromatogr. 602 (1992) 57.
[38] P.R. Haddad, S. Laksana, R.G. Simons, J. Chromatogr. 640
(1993) 135.
[39] P.R. Haddad, S. Laksana, J. Chromatogr. A 671 (1994) 131.
[40] Y. Okamoto, N. Sakamoto, M. Yamamoto, T. Kumamaru, J.
Chromatogr. 539 (1991) 221.
[41] R. Toniolo, G. Bontempelli, J. Chromatogr. A 662 (1994)
185.
[42] J.C. Umali, G.M. Moran, P.R. Haddad, J. Chromatogr. A
706 (1995) 199.
[43] Y.S. Fung, K.L. Dao, Anal. Chim. Acta 334 (1996) 51.
[44] Y.S. Fung, K.L. Dao, Anal. Chim. Acta 315 (1995) 347.
[45] H. Albrich, M. Mueller, LaborPraxis 19 (1995) 62.
[46] H. Albrich, M. Mueller, H. Pinhack, J.F. Schiff, Spectra
Anal. 24 (1995) 41.
[47] M. Andrew, I.M.V. Burholt, N.J. Kernoghan, T.P. Lynch, R.
Mackison, D. Mealor, J.A. Price, P. Schofield, J. Chromatogr. 640 (1993) 111.
[48] Marheni, P.R. Haddad, A.R. McTaggart, J. Chromatogr.
546 (1991) 221.
[49] K. Ito, H. Sunahara, Bunseki Kagaku 37 (1988) 292.
[50] K. Tanaka, P.R. Haddad, Trends Anal. Chem. 15 (1996)
266.
[51] K. Tanaka, K. Ohta, J.S. Fritz, S. Matsushita, A. Miyanaga,
J. Chromatogr. A 671 (1994) 239.
[52] K. Tanaka, J. Fritz, Am. Environ. Lab. 7 (1995) 39.
[53] W. Hu, T. Takeuchi, H. Haraguchi, Anal. Chem. 65 (1993)
2204.
[54] W.Z. Hu, P.R. Haddad, Trends Anal. Chem. 17 (1998) 73.
[55] W. Hu, A. Miyazaki, H. Tao, A. Itoh, T. Umemura, H.
Haraguchi, Anal. Chem. 67 (1995) 3713.
[56] W. Hu, K. Hasebe, D.M. Reynolds, T. Umemura, S.
Kamiya, A. Itoh, H. Haraguchi, J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat.
Technol. 20 (1997) 1903.
[57] W.Z. Hu, P.R. Haddad, Anal. Commun. 35 (1998) 317.
[58] W. Hu, P.R. Haddad, K. Hasebe, K. Tanaka, P. Tong, C.
Khoo, Anal. Chem. (1998) (in press).
[59] Y. Liu, N. Avdalovic, C. Pohl, R. Matt, H. Dhillon, R.
Kiser, Am. Lab. 30 (1998) 48ff.
[60] H. Small, J. Riviello, Anal. Chem. 70 (1998) 2205.
[61] H. Small, Y. Liu, N. Avdalovic, Anal. Chem. 70 (1998)
3629.
[62] R. Saari Nordhaus, J.M. Anderson Jr., J. Chromatogr. A
782 (1997) 75.
[63] M. Macka, P.R. Haddad, Electrophoresis 18 (1997) 2482.
[64] A.H. Harakuwe, P.R. Haddad, J. Chromatogr. A (1998) (in
press).
[65] C. Stathakis, R.M. Cassidy, J. Chromatogr. A 699 (1995)
353.
[66] K. Sarmini, E. Kenndler, J. Chromatogr. A 792 (1997) 3.
[67] C.M. Shelton, J.T. Koch, N. Desai, J.F. Wheeler, J. Chromatogr. A 792 (1997) 455.
[68] W. Buchberger, P.R. Haddad, J. Chromatogr. 608 (1992)
59.
[69] M.T. Galceran, L. Puignou, M. Diez, J. Chromatogr. A 732
(1996) 167.
[70] A.H. Harakuwe, P.R. Haddad, W. Buchberger, J. Chromatogr. A 685 (1994) 161.
[71] P.R. Haddad, A.H. Harakuwe, W. Buchberger, J. Chromatogr. A 706 (1995) 571.
[72] F. Foret, S. Fanali, A. Nardi, P. Bocek, Electrophoresis 11
(1990) 780.
[73] W. Buchberger, P.R. Haddad, J. Chromatogr. A 687 (1994)
343.
[74] M.J. Sepaniak, T. Vo Dinh, D.L. Stokes, V. Tropina, J.E.
Dickens, Talanta 43 (1996) 1889.
[75] S. Schaffer, P. Gareil, C. Dezael, D. Richard, J. Chromatogr. A 740 (1996) 151.
[76] S. Conradi, C. Vogt, H. Wittrisch, G. Knobloch, G. Werner,
J. Chromatogr. A 745 (1996) 103.
[77] L. Arce, A. Rios, M. Valcarcel, J. Chromatogr. A 791
(1997) 279.
[78] L. Arce, A. Rios, M. Valcarcel, Fresenius’ J. Anal. Chem.
360 (1998) 697.
[79] X. Huang, M.J. Gordon, R.N. Zare, Anal. Chem. 60 (1988)
375.
[80] P. Doble, P.R. Haddad, J. Chromatogr. A (1998) (in press).
[81] P. Gebauer, W. Thormann, P. Bocek, Electrophoresis 16
(1995) 2039.
[82] W.C. Brumley, J. Chromatogr. Sci. 33 (1995) 670.
[83] L. Krivankova, P. Bocek, J. Chromatogr. B 689 (1997) 13.
[84] M. Mazereeuw, U.R. Tjaden, N.J. Reinhoud, J. Chromatogr. Sci. 33 (1995) 686.
[85] M. Valcarcel, A. Rios, L. Arce, Rev. Anal. Chem. 28 (1998)
63.
[86] A. Taga, M. Sugimura, S. Honda, J. Chromatogr. A 802
(1998) 243.
[87] F.B. Regan, M.P. Meaney, S.M. Lunte, J. Chromatogr. B
657 (1994) 409.
[88] M. Macka, B. Paull, P. Andersson, P.R. Haddad, J. Chromatogr. A 767 (1997) 303.
[89] M. Macka, P. Nesterenko, P. Andersson, P.R. Haddad, J.
Chromatogr. A 803 (1998) 279.
P.R. Haddad et al. / J. Chromatogr. A 856 (1999) 145 – 177
[90] I. Haumann, K. Baechmann, J. Chromatogr. A 717 (1995)
385.
[91] P. Blatny, F. Kvasnicka, E. Kenndler, J. Chromatogr. A 757
(1997) 297.
[92] P. Kuban, W. Buchberger, P.R. Haddad, J. Chromatogr. A
770 (1997) 329.
[93] J.S. Fritz, R.C. Freeze, M.J. Thornton, D.T. Gjerde, J.
Chromatogr. A 739 (1996) 57.
[94] J.R. Veraart, C. Gooijer, H. Lingeman, N.H. Velthorst,
U.A.Th. Brinkman, J. Chromatogr. B 719 (1998) 199.
[95] C.W. Whang, J. Pawliszyn, Anal. Commun. 35 (1998) 353.
[96] N.A. Guzman, S.S. Park, D. Schaufelberger, L. Hernandez,
X. Paez, P. Rada, A.J. Tomlinson, S. Naylor, J. Chromatogr. B 697 (1997) 37.
[97] M.I. Davies, C.E. Lunte, Chem. Soc. Rev. 26 (1997) 215.
[98] L.A. Dawson, Reviews and Microdialysis, J. Chromatogr. B
697 (1997) 89.
[99] L. Bao, P.K. Dasgupta, Anal. Chem. 64 (1992) 991.
[100] B.P. Buscher, A.P. Hofte, U.R. Tjaden, J. Van der Greef, J.
Chromatogr. A 777 (1997) 51.
[101] B.P. Buscher, U.R. Tjaden, J. Van der Greef, J. Chromatogr.
A 764 (1997) 135.
[102] B.P. Buscher, U.R. Tjaden, J. Van der Greef, J. Chromatogr.
A 788 (1997) 165.
[103] P. Kuban, B. Karlberg, Anal. Chem. 69 (1997) 1169.
[104] W. Ding, J. Thornton, J. Fritz, Electrophoresis 19 (1998)
2133.
177
[105] M. Macka, P. Andersson, P.R. Haddad, Anal. Chem. 70
(1998) 743.
[106] P. Doble, M. Macka, P. Andersson, P.R. Haddad, Anal.
Commun. 34 (1997) 351.
[107] P. Doble, M. Macka, P.R. Haddad, Organic, J. Chromatogr.
A 804 (1998) 327.
[108] O.V. Krokhin, H. Hoshino, O.A. Shpigun, T. Yotsuyanagi, J.
Chromatogr. A 772 (1997) 339.
[109] W. Buchberger, K. Winna, M. Turner, J. Chromatogr. A 671
(1994) 375.
¨
¨
[110] K. Bachmann,
B. Gottlicher,
I. Haag, K.Y. Han, W. Hensel,
A. Mainka, J. Chromatogr. A 688 (1994) 283.
[111] M. Breadmore, M. Macka, P.R. Haddad, Electrophoresis
(1998) (in press).
[112] P.R. Haddad, J. Chromatogr. A 770 (1997) 281.
[113] C.A. Lucy, J. Chromatogr. A 739 (1996) 3.
[114] L.E. Vanatta, J. Chromatogr. A 739 (1996) 199.
[115] J. Bettmer, K. Cammann, M. Robecke, J. Chromatogr. A
654 (1993) 177.
[116] C. Sarzanini, M.C. Bruzzoniti, G. Sacchero, E. Mentasti, J.
Chromatogr. A 739 (1996) 63.
[117] E. Pobozy, B. Glod, J. Kaniewska, M. Trojanowicz, J.
Chromatogr. A 718 (1995) 329.
[118] O.V. Krokhin, W.Z. Xu, H. Hoshino, O.A. Shpigun, T.
Yotsuyanagi, Chem. Lett. 12 (1996) 1095.
[119] N. Iki, H. Hoshino, T. Yotsuyanagi, J. Chromatogr. A 652
(1993) 539.