ﺤﻴﺔ ﺒﺎﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺃﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺎﹰ ﻤﺨﺘﺒﺭ ﻴ ﺭﻋﺎﻴﺔ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍ B

‫____________________________________________________‬
‫‪MARINA MESOPOTAMICA‬‬
‫‪23 ( 1 ): 149-165‬‬
‫‪2008‬‬
‫ﺭﻋﺎﻴﺔ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ‪ Barbus sharpeyi‬ﻤﺨﺘﺒﺭ ﻴ ﹰﺎ ﺒﺎﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺃﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺤﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻋﺒﺩﺍ ﻟﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺤﺎﺘﻡ ﻏﺎﺯﻱ‪* ،‬ﺴﺎﺠﺩ ﺴﻌﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻭﺭ‪ ،‬ﻤﺤﻤﺩ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻭﻤﺎﻟﻙ ﺤﺴﻥ ﻋﻠﻲ‬
‫ﻗﺴﻡ ﺍﻷﺤﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺭﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻤﺭﻜﺯ ﻋﻠﻭﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺍﻕ‬
‫ﻗﺴﻡ ﺍﻷﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺭﻭﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺭﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺯﺭﺍﻋﺔ‪ ،‬ﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺍﻕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺨﻼﺼﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﺕ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺭﻋﺎﻴﺔ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺃﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ﺤﺩﻴﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺱ ‪Barbus‬‬
‫‪ sharpeyi‬ﺘﺤﺕ ﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﻤﺨﺘﺒﺭﻴﺔ ﻤﺴﻴﻁﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻟﻤﺩﺓ ‪ 28‬ﻴﻭﻡ‪ ،‬ﺸﻤﻠﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻻﺒﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺠﺭﻯ ﺘﻨﻤﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺘﻜﺜﻴﺭﻫﺎ ﻤﺨﺘﺒﺭﻴﺎ‬
‫‪ Brachionus calyciflorus‬ﻭﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺭﻭﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻤﺎﻟﺢ ﺤﺩﻴﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺱ ﻤﻥ‬
‫ﻼ‬
‫ﻨﻭﻉ‪ Artemia franciscana‬ﻭﻤﺘﻔﺭﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻭﺍﻤﺱ ‪ Moina affinis‬ﻓﻀ ﹰ‬
‫ﻋﻥ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻭﺭﺩ ‪ NRD‬ﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺭﻭﺘﻴﻥ ‪.% 59‬‬
‫ﺍﻅﻬﺭﺕ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻥ ﻤﻌﺩﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻭ ﻭﻨﺴﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ‬
‫ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺘﻐﺫﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺤﻲ ﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ﻤﻊ‬
‫ﺘﻔﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻻﺒﻲ ‪ B. calyciflorus‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺨﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺒﻠﻎ ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﻁﻭل ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺘﺞ ﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﻓﻲ ﻨﻬﺎﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺭﺒﺔ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻻﺒﻲ ‪ 41.9‬ﻤﻠﻡ ‪ /‬ﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻭﺯﻥ ‪ 113.5‬ﻤﻠﻐﻡ ‪ /‬ﻴﺭﻗﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻭﻗﺕ ﺍﻟﺫﻱ‬
‫ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﻤﻌﺩﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻁﻭل ﻭﺍﻟﻭﺯﻥ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺭﻭﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻤﺎﻟﺢ ‪A.‬‬
‫‪ 37.7 franciscana‬ﻤﻠﻡ ‪ /‬ﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻭ ‪ 110.2‬ﻤﻠﻐﻡ ‪ /‬ﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻭﺍﻟﻲ‪،‬‬
‫ﺒﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺒﻠﻐﺕ ﺒﺎﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﻤﺘﻔﺭﻉ ﺍﻟﻠﻭﺍﻤﺱ ‪ 33.5 M.affinis‬ﻤﻠﻡ ‪ /‬ﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻭ‬
‫‪ 94.6‬ﻤﻠﻐﻡ ‪ /‬ﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻭﺍﻟﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻨﺩ ﺘﻐﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ‪ NRD‬ﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺭﻭﺘﻴﻥ ‪ % 59‬ﻓﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻭ ﺃﻭﻁﺀ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻁﻭل‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻭﺯﻥ ﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ ﻤﻊ ﺒﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺤﻴﺙ ﺒﻠﻎ ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﻁﻭل ‪ 28.4‬ﻤﻠﻡ‪ /‬ﻴﺭﻗﺔ‬
‫ﻭﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻥ ‪ 83.6‬ﻤﻠﻐﻡ ‪ /‬ﻴﺭﻗﺔ‪ .‬ﺘﺤﻘﻘﺕ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ‬
‫ﻋﻨﺩ ﺘﻐﺫﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻻﺒﻲ ‪ % 82.5 B.calyciflorus‬ﺃﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻏﺫﻴﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ‪ A.franciscana‬ﻭ ‪ M. affinis‬ﻭ‪ NRD‬ﻓﻜﺎﻨﺕ‬
‫ﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﻬﺎ ‪ % 75.9‬ﻭ ‪ % 74.6‬ﻭ ‪ % 62.4‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻭﺍﻟﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﻋﺒﺪاﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﺗﻢ ﻏﺎزي وﺟﻤﺎﻋﺘﻪ‬
‫‪150‬‬
‫‪-----------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺩﻤﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻴﻨﺘﺸﺭ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﻤﻥ ‪ 68‬ﻨﻭﻉ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻷﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﻓـﻲ ﺍﻟﻤـﺴﻁﺤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺌﻴـﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺍﻗﻴـﺔ‬
‫)ﺍﻟﺩﻫﺎﻡ‪ ،(1982 ،‬ﻭﺸﻜﻠﺕ ﺴﻤﻜﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ‪ Barbus sharpyei‬ﺍﺤﺩ ﺍﻷﻨﻭﺍﻉ ﺍﻷﻜﺜـﺭ‬
‫ﺸﻴﻭﻋﹰﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻤﻴﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺨﺼﻭﺼﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻻﻫﻭﺍﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺴﻤﻜﻪ ﺍﻗﺘـﺼﺎﺩﻴﻪ ﻤﻔـﻀﻠﻪ‬
‫ﻟﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻬﻠﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺍﻗﻲ ﺍﻻ ﺍﻥ ﻤﺨﺯﻭﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻜﻲ ﻗﺩ ﺍﻨﺨﻔﺽ ﺒـﺸﻜل ﺤـﺎﺩ ﺒـﺴﺒﺏ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻔﻴﻑ ﺍﻟﻤﺒﺭﻤﺞ ﻟﻤﻨﻁﻘﻪ ﺍﻻﻫﻭﺍﺭ ﻋﺎﻡ ‪ 1992‬ﻭﻤﺎ ﺒﻌﺩﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻥ ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﺎﻓﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻤﺨﺯﻭﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻜﻲ ﻴﺘﻁﻠﺏ ﺨﻠﻕ ﺇﻤﺩﺍﺩﺍﺕ ﺴﻨﻭﻴﺔ ﻟﻬﺎ ﻤﻥ ﺨﻼل ﺃﺠﺭﺍﺀ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻘـﻴﺢ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ﻭﺭﻋﺎﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻗﺴﺔ ﻨﻅﺭﺍ ﻟﺘﺩﻤﻴﺭ ﻤﻨﺎﻁﻕ ﺍﻟﺘﻜـﺎﺜﺭ ﺍﻟﻁﺒﻴﻌـﻲ ﻓـﻲ‬
‫ﻤﻨﻁﻘﺔ ﺍﻻﻫﻭﺍﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻴﺩ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﺌﺭ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﺠﺭﻴﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺩﻴﺩ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻠﻴﺔ ﻋﻥ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻭﻉ ﻤـﻥ ﺍﻻﺴـﻤﺎﻙ ﺘﻨـﺎﻭل‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺽ ﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺠﻭﺍﻨــﺏ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺎﺘﻴـﺔ ﻟﻬـﺎ ﻓـﻲ ﺍﻟﻤـﺴﻁﺤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺌﻴـﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺍﻗﻴـﺔ‬
‫)ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻴﻡ‪ ;1976 ,‬ﻤﺤﻴﺴﻥ‪ ;1980 ,‬ﻴﺴﺭ‪ .(1988 ,‬ﻭﺩﺭﺱ ﻤﺤﻴﺴﻥ )‪ (1988‬ﺇﻨـﺘﺎﺝ‬
‫ﺼﻐﺎﺭ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ﺒﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺭﻴﺦ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ﻭﺇﻁﻼﻗﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻁﺤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺌﻴـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺍﻗﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﻀﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺘﺠﺎﺭﺏ ﺃﻗﻠﻤﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺭﺍﻜﻴﺯ ﻤﻠﺤﻴﺔ ﻤﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ )‪Salman et 1993‬‬
‫‪ .(al.,‬ﻭﺘﻨﺎﻭل ﺍﻟﺤﺒﻴﺏ )‪ (1996‬ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤل ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻼﺌﻤﺔ ﻟﺘﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﺼـﻐﺎﺭﻫﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﺴـﺠل‬
‫)‪ Backman (1962‬ﺍﻨﺘﺸﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻨﻬﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻴﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻭﺭﻴﺔ ﻭﺒﻴﻥ ﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺘﻐﺫﻴﺘﻬﺎ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺨﺼﺎﺌﺹ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﻴﺔ ﻟﻤﻨﺎﻁﻕ ﺘﻜﺎﺜﺭﻫﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺩﺭﺱ )‪ Voldin and Ivanova (1973‬ﺼﻔﺎﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﻅﻬﺭﻴﺔ ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﻟـﻰ ﺍﻥ‬
‫ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺘﺘﻐﻴﺭ ﻤﻊ ﺘﻐﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺭ ﻭﺍﻥ ﻁﻭل ﺍﻟﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻜﺒﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻤـﺎﺫﺝ ﺍﻟـﺼﻐﻴﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻤﻤﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﻴﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻴﻡ )‪ (1976‬ﺍﻟﺼـﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺩﺩﻴﺔ ﻟﺴﻤﻜﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ﺍﺫ ﺒﻠﻎ ﻋـﺩﺩ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺸﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺯﻋﻨﻔﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺯﻋﺎﻨﻑ ﺍﻟﻅﻬﺭﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺨﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺃﺭﺒﻌﺔ ﻭﻻ ﺘﻭﺠﺩ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻟﻭﺍﻤﺱ ﻓﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻡ ﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻭﻜﺔ ﺍﻟﻅﻬﺭﻴﺔ ﻗﻭﻴﺔ ﻭﻤﺴﻨﻨﺔ‪ .‬ﻜﻤﺎ ﻗﺩﺭ )‪ Hussein et al., (2001‬ﻨﺴﺏ‬
‫ﻤﻌﺩﻻﺕ ﺍﺴﺘﻬﻼﻙ ﺍﻷﻭﻜﺴﺠﻴﻥ ﻭﺇﻓﺭﺍﺯ ﺍﻻﻤﻭﻨﻴﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺃﻨﻭﺍﻉ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻭﻁﻴﺎﺕ ﻫـﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻁﺎﻥ ‪ B. xanyhopterus‬ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺎﺭﺏ ﻻﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ‪Cyprinus carpio‬‬
‫ﻭﻟﻭﺤﻅ ﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ﻴﺴﺘﻬﻠﻙ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻴﺎﺕ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻜﺴﺠﻴﻥ ﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ ﺒﺎﻷﻨﻭﺍﻉ ﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺩﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﺩﺒﻴﻜل )‪ (1996‬ﺘﻐﺫﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻴﺽ ﺼﻐﺎﺭ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ‪ .‬ﺍﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴـﺎﺕ ﺤـﻭل‬
‫ﺘﻐﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺤل ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﻴﺔ ﻟﻬﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻭﻉ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻻﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﻭﺘﻜﺎﺩ ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻤﻌﺩﻭﻤﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪151‬‬
‫ﺭﻋﺎﻴﺔ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ‪B. sharpeyi‬‬
‫‪-----------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ـﺎﺭ‬
‫ـﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﺃﺸـ‬
‫ـﺴﻤﻜﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻨـ‬
‫ـﺔ ﻟـ‬
‫ـﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﺎﺘﻴـ‬
‫ـﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺫﻴـ‬
‫ـﺏ )‪ (1996‬ﻁﺒﻴﻌـ‬
‫ـﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﺒﻴـ‬
‫ﻭﺒـ‬
‫)‪ Backman (1962‬ﺇﻟﻰ ﺇﻤﻜﺎﻨﻴﺔ ﺃﻗﻠﻤـﺔ ﺍﺴـﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨـﻲ ﻟﻠﺘﺭﺒﻴـﺔ ﻓـﻲ ﺍﻷﺤـﻭﺍﺽ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺘﺤﺕ ﺍﻟﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺘﺒﺭﻴﻪ‪ .‬ﻏﻴﺭ ﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﺌﻴﺴﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘـﻲ ﺘﻭﺍﺠـﻪ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻤﻠﻴﻥ ﻓﻲ ﻤﺠﺎل ﺘﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻬﻼﻜﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺘﻔﻌﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺤل ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻰ ﻤـﻥ‬
‫ﻋﻤﺭ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻜﺔ ﻟﺫﺍ ﺘﻌﺘﺒﺭ ﻓﺘﺭﺓ ﺭﻋﺎﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﻤﺭﺤﻠﺔ ﺤﺭﺠﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺘﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﻭﻴﺠﺏ‬
‫ﺘﻘﺩﻴﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺎﺴﺏ ﻟﻠﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺤﻴﺙ ﺍﻟﺤﺠﻡ ﺒﻤﺎ ﻴﻼﺌﻡ ﺤﺠﻡ ﻓﺘﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻡ ﻭﻜﺫﻟﻙ ﻟﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ‬
‫ﺘﻐﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﻴل ﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻬﻼﻜﺎﺕ )ﺍﻟﻭﺍﻋﺭ ﻭ ﺭﺤﻭﻤﺔ ‪ .(1985‬ﻭﺘﺸﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺩﻴﺩ ﻤﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺤﻭﺙ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺤﻲ ﺨﺼﻭﺼﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺤل ﺍﻷﻭﻟـﻰ ﺍﻟﺘـﻲ‬
‫ﺘﻌﻘــﺏ ﻓﺘــﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﻘــﺱ ﻭﺍﻤﺘــﺼﺎﺹ ﻜــﻴﺱ ﺍﻟﻤــﺢ ‪Wang et al.,1992‬‬
‫‪. Kassim et al.,1998‬‬
‫ﺍﺠﺭﻴﺕ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺒﺩﺃ ﺒﺭﻨﺎﻤﺞ ﻟﻠﺘﻜﺜﻴﺭ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ﻟﺴﻤﻜﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ﻓﻲ‬
‫ﻤﺭﻜﺯ ﻋﻠﻭﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺎﺭ ﻟﻐﺭﺽ ﺍﻤﺩﺍﺩ ﻤﻴﺎﻩ ﺍﻻﻫﻭﺍﺭ ﺒﺄﺼﺒﻌﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ﻭﺤﺩﺩ ﻫﺩﻑ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻤﻌﺭﻓﺔ ﺇﻤﻜﺎﻨﻴﺔ ﺭﻋﺎﻴﺔ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ‪ B.Sharpyei‬ﺘﺤﺕ ﺍﻟﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺘﺒﺭﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻴﻁﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺒﺎﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺘﻐﺫﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﻨﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﻴﻌﻁﻲ ﺃﻓﻀل ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻭ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨـﺔ ﺫﻟـﻙ ﻤـﻊ ﺍﺴـﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻐـﺫﺍﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻭﺭﺩ ‪.NRD‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﻭﺍﺩ ﻭﻁﺭﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﻤل‪:‬‬
‫‪ -1‬ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ‪-:‬‬
‫ﺠﻠﺒﺕ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺴﻤﻜﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ‪ B. Sharpeyi‬ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺘﺒﺭ ﻤﻥ ﻨﺎﺘﺞ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻘﻴﺢ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ﻓﻲ ﻤﻔﻘﺱ ﻤﺭﻜﺯ ﻋﻠﻭﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺎﺭ ﻟﻤﻭﺴﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺎﺜﺭ ﻨﻴـﺴﺎﻥ ‪ ،2005‬ﻭﻜﺎﻨـﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺒﻌﻤﺭ ﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺃﻴﺎﻡ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺱ ﻭﺯﻋﺕ ﻓﻲ ‪ 12‬ﺤﻭﺽ ﺯﺠﺎﺠﻲ ﻤﻌﺩ ﻤﺴﺒﻘﺎ ﻟﻬﺫﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺭﺽ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ‪ 90 x 45 x 30‬ﺴﻡ )ﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﺤﻭﺍﺽ ﻟﻜل ﻤﻌﺎﻤﻠﺔ( ﻭﺒﻭﺍﻗـﻊ ‪50‬‬
‫ﻴﺭﻗﺔ‪ /‬ﻟﺘﺭ‪ .‬ﻭﺃﺨﺫﺕ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﻋﺸﻭﺍﺌﻴﺔ ﻤﻥ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻻﺤﻭﺍﺽ ﻤﻘﺩﺍﺭﻫﺎ ‪ 30‬ﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻤـﻥ ﻜـل‬
‫ﻤﻌﺎﻤﻠﺔ ﻟﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻁﻭل ﺍﻻﺒﺘﺩﺍﺌﻲ ﻟﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻏﺫﻴﺕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻨـﻭﺍﻉ‬
‫ﻤﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺤﻲ ﺇﻀﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ‪ NRD‬ﺍﻟﻤـﺴﺘﻭﺭﺩ‬
‫ﻨــﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺒــﺭﻭﺘﻴﻥ ‪ % 59‬ﻭﻏــﺫﻴﺕ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗــﺎﺕ ﻟﺤــﺩ ﻤــﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺍﻹﺸــﺒﺎﻉ‬
‫)‪.(Singh and Srivastava, 1985‬‬
‫ﻋﺒﺪاﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﺗﻢ ﻏﺎزي وﺟﻤﺎﻋﺘﻪ‬
‫‪152‬‬
‫‪-----------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪ -2‬ﺍﻷﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﺔ‪- :‬‬
‫ﺸﻤﻠﺕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻷﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻻﺒﻲ ‪ B.calyciflorus‬ﻭ ﻴﺭﻗـﺎﺕ ‪A. franciscana‬‬
‫ﻭﻤﺘﻔﺭﻉ ﺍﻟﻠﻭﺍﻤﺱ ‪ Moina affinis‬ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻨﻤﻴﺕ ﻓﻲ ﻤﺨﺘﺒﺭ ﺍﻻﺴـﺘﺯﺭﺍﻉ ﻓـﻲ ﻗـﺴﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺤﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺭﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻤﺭﻜﺯ ﻋﻠﻭﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺎﺭ‪ .‬ﻏﺫﻯ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻻﺒﻲ ‪ B. calyciflorus‬ﻭﻤﺘﻔﺭﻉ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻠﻭﺍﻤﺱ ‪ Moina affinis‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺨﻤﻴﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺨﺒﺯ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻓﺔ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺃﺫﺍﺒﺘﻬﺎ ﻓـﻲ ﻤـﺎﺀ ﺩﺍﻓـﺊ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺃﻨﺘﺠﺕ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ‪ A.franciscana‬ﻤﻥ ﻓﻘﺱ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻭﺽ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻓﺔ ﻤﺨﺘﺒﺭﻴﺎ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺠﻤﻌﻬﺎ ﻤـﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ‪ .‬ﺃﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ‪ NRD‬ﻓﻬﻭ ﻏﺫﺍﺀ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﺭﺩ ﻭﻤـﺼﻨﻊ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺸـﻜل‬
‫ﺤﺒﻴﺒﺎﺕ ﺼﻐﻴﺭﺓ ﺘﻨﺎﺴﺏ ﺘﻐﺫﻴﺔ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺴﻤﺎﻙ‪ ،‬ﻴﺘﺭﺍﻭﺡ ﺤﺠﻤـﻪ ﻤـﻥ ‪400 -200‬‬
‫ﻤﺎﻴﻜﺭﻭﻤﻴﺘﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭﻜﺎﻥ ﻴﺤﺘﻭﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺒﺭﻭﺘﻴﻥ ﻤﻘﺩﺍﺭﻫﺎ ‪ % 59‬ﻭﺍﻟـﺩﻫﻭﻥ ‪% 15‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺭﻤﺎﺩ ‪ % 12‬ﻭﺍﻷﻟﻴﺎﻑ ‪ % 1‬ﻭﺍﻟﺭﻁﻭﺒﺔ ‪ % 7‬ﺇﻀﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺘﺎﻤﻴﻨﺎﺕ ‪C, E , D3‬‬
‫‪ ., A‬ﺨﻼل ﻓﺘﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺭﺒﺔ ﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺀ ﻴﻐﻴﺭ ﻴﻭﻤﻴـﺎ ﺒـﺸﻜل ﺠﺯﺌـﻲ ﻟﻠـﺘﺨﻠﺹ ﻤـﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻼﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﻀﻌﺕ ﺍﻷﺤﻭﺍﺽ ﻓﻲ ﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺘﺒﺭ ﻭﺠﺭﺕ ﻤﺘﺎﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤل ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌـﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺴﺎﺴﻴﺔ ﻤﺜل ﺍﻷﻭﻜﺴﺠﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺫﺍﺏ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻭﺤﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺱ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺩﺭﻭﺠﻴﻨﻲ ﻭﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﺍﻟﺤـﺭﺍﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺒﺎﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺠﻬﺎﺯ ‪ YSI‬ﻭﻗﻴﺱ ﻤﻘﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻻﻤﻭﻨﻴﺎ ﺒﺎﻟﻁﺭﻴﻘـﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻭﻨﻴـﺔ ﺒﺎﺴـﺘﻌﻤﺎل ‪Kit -‬‬
‫‪.3351‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺭﻴﺎﻀﻴﺔ‪-:‬‬
‫ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺭﺠﺕ ﻤﻌﺩﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﻨﺴﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺎﺀ ‪ %‬ﻟﻠﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺒﺎﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫)‪ (Teng et al., 1985‬ﻭﻜﺎﻻﺘﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻨﻴﺔ = ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺌﻲ – ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻥ ﺍﻻﺒﺘﺩﺍﺌﻲ‬
‫ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺎﺀ ‪ = %‬ﺍﻟﻌﺩﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺌﻲ ‪ /‬ﺍﻟﻌﺩﺩ ﺍﻻﺒﺘﺩﺍﺌﻲ ‪100 X‬‬
‫ﺤﻠﻠﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻨﺎﺕ ﺇﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺎ ﺒﺎﺴـﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺭﻨـﺎﻤﺞ ﺍﻹﺤـﺼﺎﺌﻲ )‪Statistical (SPSS‬‬
‫‪ Pakage For Social Science‬ﺒﺄﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻤﻴﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺸﻭﺍﺌﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻤل ﻭﺍﺨﺘﻴـﺭﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤل ﺍﻟﻤﺩﺭﺴﺔ ﺒﺎﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻗل ﻓﺭﻕ ﻤﻌﻨﻭﻱ ‪ L.S.D‬ﻓﻲ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﻤﻌﻨﻭﻴﺔ ‪.0.05‬‬
‫‪153‬‬
‫ﺭﻋﺎﻴﺔ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ‪B. sharpeyi‬‬
‫‪-----------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ‪-:‬‬
‫ﺃﻭﻻ‪ -:‬ﺍﻟﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﻴﺔ‪-:‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤل ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﻴﺔ ﻟﻤﻴﺎﻩ ﺍﺤﻭﺍﺽ ﺭﻋﺎﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﻜﺎﻻﺘﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﻤﻌﺩل ﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﺤﺭﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺀ ‪1 ± 23‬ﻡ◦ ﻭﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻷﻭﻜﺴﺠﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺫﺍﺏ ‪1 ± 8.8‬ﻤﻠﻐـﻡ‪/‬ﻟﺘـﺭ‬
‫ﻭﺘﺭﻜﻴﺯ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻭﺤﺔ ‪ 0.3 ± 1.2‬ﻤﻠﻐﻡ ‪ /‬ﻟﺘﺭ ﻭﺍﻻﺱ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺩﺭﻭﺠﻴﻨﻲ ‪ 0.8 ± 7.2‬ﻭﺍﻻﻤﻭﻨﻴـﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻗل ﻤﻥ ‪ 0.1‬ﻤﻠﻐﻡ ‪ /‬ﻟﺘﺭ‪،‬‬
‫ﺜﺎﻨﻴ ﹰﺎ‪ -:‬ﺘﻐﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ‪-:‬‬
‫ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﺍﻷﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻭ‪-:‬‬
‫ﻴﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻜل )‪ 1‬ﻭ ‪ (2‬ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻁﻭل ﻟﻠﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺭﺒﻴﺕ ﻤﺨﺘﺒﺭﻴﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻐﺫﺍﺓ‬
‫ﻼ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻟﻭﺤﻅ ﺍﻥ ﺍﺴـﺘﺠﺎﺒﺔ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺃﻨﻭﺍﻉ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺤﻲ ﻓﻀ ﹰ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﻟﻠﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺤﻲ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺃﻓﻀل ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻅﻬﺭ ﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺫﻴـﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻴـﺔ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺯﺭﻴﻌﻪ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻻﺒﻴﺎﺕ ﺘﻌﻁﻲ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﻤﻌﻨﻭﻴﺔ )‪ ( P< 0.05‬ﻓﻲ ﻨﻤﻭ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻜﺔ ﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ ﻤـﻊ‬
‫ﺒﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﺔ ﺤﻴﺙ ﻭﺼل ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻁﻭل ‪ 113.5‬ﻤﻠﻐﻡ ‪ /‬ﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻭ‪41.9‬‬
‫ﻤﻠﻡ ‪ /‬ﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻭﺍﻟﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻨـﺩ ﺍﺴـﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ‪ A. Franciscans‬ﻭﻤﺘﻔـﺭﻉ ﺍﻟﻠـﻭﺍﻤﺱ‬
‫‪ M. affinis‬ﻜﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺤﻲ ﺍﻋﻁﺕ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﻤﻌﺩل ﻟﻠﻭﺯﻥ ‪ 110.2‬ﻭ ‪ 94.6‬ﻤﻠﻐـﻡ‪ /‬ﻴﺭﻗـﺔ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻭﺍﻟﻲ ﻭﻤﻌﺩل ﻟﻠﻁﻭل ‪ 37.7‬ﻭ‪ 33.5‬ﻤﻠﻡ ‪ /‬ﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻭﺍﻟﻲ‪ ،‬ﺒﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺒﻠـﻎ ﻤﻌـﺩل‬
‫ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻁﻭل ﻟﻠﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ‪ 83,6 NRD‬ﻤﻠﻐﻡ ‪ /‬ﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻭ‬
‫‪ 28.4‬ﻤﻠﻡ ‪ /‬ﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻭﺍﻟﻲ )ﺠﺩﻭل ‪.(1‬‬
‫ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻨﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻴﻭﻀﺢ ﺍﻟﺸﻜل )‪ (3‬ﻤﻌﺩﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﻟﻭﺯﻨﻴﺔ ﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺘﺭﺒﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺃﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺤﻴﺔ ﻤﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻴﻼﺤﻅ ﺍﻥ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﺯﻨﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻴﺭﻗـﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻜﺎﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﺴﺒﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻨﻲ ‪ 40.2‬ﻤﻠﻐﻡ‪/‬ﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺘﻐﺫﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻻﺒﻲ ‪B.calyciflorus‬‬
‫ﺒﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺴﺠل ﺃﻓﻀل ﻤﻌﺩل ﻟﻠﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺒﺎﻟﻭﺯﻥ ﺒﺎﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ‪ A. franciscana‬ﻓﻲ ﺘﻐﺫﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻷﺴﺒﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺙ ‪ 35.4‬ﻤﻠﻐﻡ‪ /‬ﻴﺭﻗﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻤﺎ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺘـﻲ‬
‫ﻏﺫﻴﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ‪ M. affinis‬ﻓﻘﺩ ﺒﻠﻎ ﺍﻓﻀل ﻤﻌﺩل ﻟﻠﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻨﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﺴﺒﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻨﻲ ‪29.5‬‬
‫ﻤﻠﻐﻡ ‪/‬ﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻭﻟﻡ ﺘﺨﺘﻠﻑ ﻤﻌﻨﻭﻴﹰﺎ )‪ (P>0.05‬ﻋﻥ ﺍﻻﺴﺒﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﻜﺎﻥ ‪ 28.8‬ﻤﻠﻐﻡ‬
‫‪/‬ﻴﺭﻗﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﺃﻓﻀل ﻤﻌﺩل ﻟﻠﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺒﺎﻟﻭﺯﻥ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺘﻐﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ‬
‫ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﺴﺒﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺙ ‪ 31.9‬ﻤﻠﻐﻡ ‪ /‬ﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﻗل ﻤﻌﺩل ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﺴﺒﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺜـﺎﻨﻲ ‪ 17.1‬ﻤﻠﻐـﻡ‬
‫‪/‬ﻴﺭﻗﺔ )ﺠﺩﻭل ‪.(2‬‬
‫‪154‬‬
‫ﻋﺒﺪاﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﺗﻢ ﻏﺎزي وﺟﻤﺎﻋﺘﻪ‬
‫‪-----------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺎﺀ ‪:‬‬
‫ﻴﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻜل )‪ (4‬ﻨﺴﺏ ﻟﻠﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻐﺫﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﻨـﻭﺍﻉ‬
‫ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺤﻲ ﻭﻟﻭﺤﻅ ﺘﻔﻭﻕ ﺍﻷﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﺼﻭل ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻓﻀل ﺍﻟﻨـﺴﺏ‪ ،‬ﺍﺫ‬
‫ﺒﻠﻐﺕ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺘﻐﺫﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻻﺒﻲ ‪ ،% 82.5 B.calyciflorus‬ﻭﺍﻨﺨﻔـﻀﺕ ﻫـﺫﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺭﻭﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻤـﺎﻟﺢ ‪ A. franciscana‬ﻭ ‪ M. affinis‬ﻭﺍﻟﻐـﺫﺍﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ‪ NRD‬ﻭﻜﺎﻨﺕ )‪ % 74.6 ،% 75.9‬ﻭ ‪ (% 62.4‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻭﺍﻟﻲ‪.‬‬
‫‪Brachionus‬‬
‫ِ‪Artemia‬‬
‫‪Moina‬‬
‫‪NRD‬‬
‫‪120‬‬
‫‪100‬‬
‫‪60‬‬
‫‪40‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫‪0‬‬
‫‪28‬‬
‫‪21‬‬
‫‪14‬‬
‫اﻟﻔﺘﺮة اﻟﺰﻣﻨﻴﺔ ) ﻳﻮم (‬
‫‪7‬‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫ﺸﻜل )‪ (1‬ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻥ )ﻤﻠﻐﻡ( ﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ‪ B. sharpyei‬ﺍﻟﻤﻐﺫﺍﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﻨﻭﺍﻉ ﻤﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻻﺒﻲ ‪ B. calyciflorus‬ﻭﺍﻻﺭﺘﻴﻤﻴﺎ ‪ A.franciscana‬ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺸﺭﻱ‬
‫‪ M.affinis‬ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ‪ NRD‬ﻟﻤﺩﺓ ‪ 28‬ﻴﻭﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﻣﻌﺪل اﻟﻮزن )ﻣﻠﻐﻢ(‬
‫‪80‬‬
‫ﺭﻋﺎﻴﺔ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ‪B. sharpeyi‬‬
‫‪155‬‬
‫‪----------------------------------------------------------------‬‬‫‪Brachionus‬‬
‫ِ‪Artemia‬‬
‫‪Moina‬‬
‫‪NRD‬‬
‫‪14‬‬
‫‪21‬‬
‫اﻟﻔﺘﺮة اﻟﺰﻣﻨﻴﺔ )ﻳﻮم(‬
‫‪28‬‬
‫‪7‬‬
‫ﻣﻌﺪل اﻟﻄﻮل )ﻣﻠﻢ (‬
‫‪45‬‬
‫‪40‬‬
‫‪35‬‬
‫‪30‬‬
‫‪25‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫‪15‬‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫‪5‬‬
‫‪0‬‬
‫‪3‬‬
‫ﺸﻜل )‪ (2‬ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﻁﻭل )ﻤﻠﻡ( ﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ‪ B. sharpyei‬ﺍﻟﻤﻐﺫﺍﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﻨﻭﺍﻉ ﻤـﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻻﺒﻲ ‪ B.calyciflorus‬ﻭﺍﻻﺭﺘﻴﻤﻴﺎ ‪ A.franciscana‬ﻭﺍﻟﻘـﺸﺭﻱ‬
‫‪ M.affinis‬ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ‪ NRD‬ﻟﻤﺩﺓ ‪ 28‬ﻴﻭﻡ‪.‬‬
‫‪Brachionus‬‬
‫ِ‪A rtemia‬‬
‫‪Moina‬‬
‫‪NRD‬‬
‫‪45‬‬
‫‪35‬‬
‫‪30‬‬
‫‪25‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫‪15‬‬
‫‪10‬‬
‫ﻣﻌﺪل اﻟﺰﻳﺎدة اﻟﻮزﻧﻴﺔ )ﻣﻠﻐﻢ(‬
‫‪40‬‬
‫‪5‬‬
‫‪0‬‬
‫‪28‬‬
‫‪21‬‬
‫‪14‬‬
‫‪7‬‬
‫اﻟﻔﺘﺮة اﻟﺰﻣﻨﻴﺔ )ﻳﻮم(‬
‫ﺸﻜل )‪ (3‬ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻨﻴﺔ )ﻤﻠﻐﻡ( ﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ‪ B . sharpeyi‬ﺍﻟﻤﻐﺫﺍﺓ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺜﻼﺜـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻨﻭﺍﻉ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻻﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟـﺩﻭﻻﺒﻲ ‪ B.calyciflorus‬ﻭﺍﻻﺭﺘﻴﻤﻴـﺎ ‪A.franciscana‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺸﺭﻱ ‪ M.affinis‬ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ‪ NRD‬ﻟﻤﺩﺓ ‪ 28‬ﻴﻭﻡ‪.‬‬
‫‪156‬‬
‫ﻋﺒﺪاﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﺗﻢ ﻏﺎزي وﺟﻤﺎﻋﺘﻪ‬
‫‪-------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺠﺩﻭل )‪ :(1‬ﻤﻌﺩﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻥ )ﻤﻠﻐﻡ( ﻭﺍﻟﻁﻭل )ﻤﻠﻡ( ﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ‪ B. sharpyei‬ﺍﻟﻤﻐﺫﺍﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺔ ‪ M.affinis A.franciscana, B.calyciflorus,‬ﻭﺍﻟﻐـﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺼـﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ‬
‫‪ NRD‬ﻟﻤﺩﺓ ‪ 28‬ﻴﻭﻤ ﹰﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻨﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺴﺒﻭﻉ ﺍﻷﻭل‬
‫ﻤﻌﺩل‬
‫‪B.calyciflor‬‬
‫‪us‬‬
‫‪A.francisca‬‬
‫‪na‬‬
‫‪Moina‬‬
‫‪affinis‬‬
‫‪NRD‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻥ‬
‫‪16.7±‬‬
‫‪3.2a‬‬
‫‪12.3±‬‬
‫‪2.1b‬‬
‫‪11.9 ±‬‬
‫‪1.1b‬‬
‫‪8.3±‬‬
‫‪1.8c‬‬
‫ﻤﻌﺩل‬
‫ﺍﻟﻁﻭل‬
‫‪15.1±‬‬
‫‪1.1A‬‬
‫‪14.3±‬‬
‫‪2.0Ab‬‬
‫‪12.4±‬‬
‫‪1.8Bd‬‬
‫‪10.5±‬‬
‫‪0.8D‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺴﺒﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻨﻲ‬
‫ﻤﻌﺩل‬
‫ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻥ‬
‫‪56.9±‬‬
‫‪4.4a‬‬
‫‪43.1±‬‬
‫‪4.1b‬‬
‫‪41.8±‬‬
‫‪3.7b‬‬
‫‪25.4±‬‬
‫‪3.5c‬‬
‫ﻤﻌﺩل‬
‫ﺍﻟﻁﻭل‬
‫‪29.3±‬‬
‫‪2.2a‬‬
‫‪25.4±‬‬
‫‪2.0b‬‬
‫‪24.3±‬‬
‫‪1.7b‬‬
‫‪17.7±‬‬
‫‪1.8c‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺴﺒﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺙ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺴﺒﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺭﺍﺒﻊ‬
‫ﻤﻌﺩل‬
‫ﻤﻌﺩل‬
‫ﻤﻌﺩل‬
‫ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻥ‬
‫‪86.4±‬‬
‫‪3.5A‬‬
‫‪78.5±‬‬
‫‪3.8B‬‬
‫‪70.6±‬‬
‫‪4.8C‬‬
‫‪57.3±‬‬
‫‪4.1D‬‬
‫ﻤﻌﺩل‬
‫ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻁﻭل‬
‫‪113.5± 37.5±‬‬
‫‪6.6a 3.1A‬‬
‫‪110.2± 33.8±‬‬
‫‪5.8b 2.7B‬‬
‫‪94.6± 30±‬‬
‫‪4.1c 2.3C‬‬
‫‪83.6± 22.5±‬‬
‫‪3.7d 3.7D‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻁﻭل‬
‫‪±41.9‬‬
‫‪3.3a‬‬
‫‪37.7±‬‬
‫‪3.8b‬‬
‫‪33.5±‬‬
‫‪2.7c‬‬
‫‪28.4±‬‬
‫‪2.9d‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺤﺭﻑ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺸﺎﺒﻬﺔ ﺘﺸﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻋﺩﻡ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻓﺭﻭﻕ ﻤﻌﻨﻭﻴﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﻤﻼﺕ )‪(P>0.05‬‬
‫ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻥ ﺍﻻﺒﺘﺩﺍﺌﻲ ‪ 2.5‬ﻤﻠﻐﻡ‬
‫ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﻁﻭل ﺍﻻﺒﺘﺩﺍﺌﻲ ‪ 5.6‬ﻤﻠﻡ‬
‫)ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻡ ﺘﻤﺜل ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺩل ‪ +‬ﺍﻻﻨﺤﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻴﺎﺭﻱ‬
‫ﺠﺩﻭل )‪ (2‬ﻤﻌﺩﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺴﺒﻭﻋﻴﺔ )ﻤﻠﻐـﻡ( ﻟﻴﺭﻗـﺎﺕ ﺍﺴـﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨـﻲ‬
‫‪ B. Sharpyei‬ﺍﻟﻤﻐﺫﺍﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟـﺩﻭﻻﺒﻲ ‪B.calyciflorus‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻻﺭﺘﻴﻤﻴــﺎ ‪ A. franciscana‬ﻭﺍﻟﻘــﺸﺭﻱ ‪ M. affinis‬ﻭﺍﻟﻐــﺫﺍﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ‪ NRD‬ﻟﻤﺩﺓ ‪ 28‬ﻴﻭﻤﹰﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻨﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺴﺒﻭﻉ ﺍﻷﻭل‬
‫ﺍﻻﺴﺒﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻨﻲ‬
‫‪4.3 ± 40.2‬‬
‫‪1.6 ± 14.2‬‬
‫‪B.calyciflorus‬‬
‫‪A‬‬
‫‪A‬‬
‫‪3.7 ± 30.8‬‬
‫‪1.2 ± 9.8‬‬
‫‪A.franciscana‬‬
‫‪B‬‬
‫‪B‬‬
‫‪2.5 ± 29.9‬‬
‫‪1.1 ± 9.4‬‬
‫‪Moina affinis‬‬
‫‪B‬‬
‫‪B‬‬
‫‪2.1 ± 17.1‬‬
‫‪0.9 ± 5.8‬‬
‫‪NRD‬‬
‫‪C‬‬
‫‪C‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﺤﺭﻑ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺸﺎﺒﻬﺔ ﺘﺸﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻋﺩﻡ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻓﺭﻭﻕ ﻤﻌﻨﻭﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺴﺒﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺙ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺴﺒﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺭﺍﺒﻊ‬
‫‪4.7 ± 27.1‬‬
‫‪3.5 ± 29.5‬‬
‫‪a‬‬
‫‪Ac‬‬
‫‪3.1 ± 31.4‬‬
‫‪2.7 ± 35.4‬‬
‫‪b‬‬
‫‪B‬‬
‫‪3.0 ± 24‬‬
‫‪2.2 ± 28.8‬‬
‫‪cd‬‬
‫‪Cd‬‬
‫‪3.6 ± 26.3‬‬
‫‪2.8 ± 31.9‬‬
‫‪ad‬‬
‫‪A‬‬
‫ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﻤﻼﺕ )‪. (P>0.05‬‬
‫ﺭﻋﺎﻴﺔ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ‪B. sharpeyi‬‬
‫‪157‬‬
‫‪-----------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫‪100‬‬
‫‪60‬‬
‫‪40‬‬
‫‪20‬‬
‫ﻧﺴﺒﺔ اﻟﺒﻘﺎء ‪%‬‬
‫‪80‬‬
‫‪0‬‬
‫‪NRD‬‬
‫‪Moina‬‬
‫‪Artemia‬‬
‫‪Brachionus‬‬
‫ﻧﻮع اﻟﻐﺬاء اﻟﻤﺴﺘﺨﺪم‬
‫ﺸﻜل )‪ (4‬ﻨﺴﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ‪ B. sharpyei‬ﺍﻟﻤﻐﺫﺍﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﻨﻭﺍﻉ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻻﻏﺫﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻻﺒﻲ ‪ B. calyciflorus‬ﻭﺍﻻﺭﺘﻴﻤﻴﺎ ‪ A. franciscana‬ﻭﺍﻟﻘـﺸﺭﻱ ‪M.‬‬
‫‪ affinis‬ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ‪ NRD‬ﻟﻤﺩﺓ ‪ 28‬ﻴﻭﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻭ ﹰﻻ‪ -‬ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤل ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺘﻘﻊ ﻗﻴﻡ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻀﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺤـﺩﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺎﺴـﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺭﻭﻓـﺔ ﻟﺘﺭﺒﻴـﺔ ﺍﺴـﻤﺎﻙ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻭﻁﻴﺎﺕ )‪ .Al-Hazzaa and Hussein, (2006‬ﻴﻌﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﺫﺒﺫﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻴل ﻓﻲ ﻗﻴﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤل‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﻴﺔ ﻟﻜﻭﻨﻬﺎ ﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻤﺨﺘﺒﺭ ﻤﺴﻴﻁﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﺔ ﺤﺭﺍﺭﻴﹰﺎ ﻻﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤل ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﻴﺔ ﺘﻠﻌـﺏ‬
‫ﺩﻭﺭ ﻜﺒﻴﺭ ﻓﻲ ﻨﺠﺎﺡ ﺘﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺤﻴﺎﺀ ﺨﺼﻭﺼﺎ ﻋﻨﺩﻤﺎ ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺤل ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﻴﺔ ﻟﻌﺩﻡ‬
‫ﻗﺩﺭﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺤﻤل ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤل ﻭﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﻤﺎ ﺘﺭﺘﻔﻊ ﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻬﻼﻜـﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻓﻲ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺤﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺒﺎﺓ ﺘﺤﺕ ﺍﻟﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺘﺒﺭﻴﺔ ﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺫﺒﺫﺒﺎﺕ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺫﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤل )‪.(Long et al., 2001 ; Kassim, 1998‬‬
‫ﺜﺎﻨﻴ ﹰﺎ‪ -‬ﺘﻐﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻥ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻏﻠﺏ ﺍﻻﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺤﺩﻴﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺱ ﺘﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻤﺎ ﻤﺘﻭﻓﺭ ﻤـﻥ ﻫﺎﺌﻤـﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻨﺒﺎﺘﻴﺔ ﺍﻭ ﺤﻴﻭﺍﻨﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻭﺴﻁ ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﺘﻌﻴﺵ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺒﺴﺒﺏ ﻋﺩﻡ ﻗﺩﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟـﺴﺒﺎﺤﺔ‬
‫ﺒﺸﻜل ﺠﻴﺩ ﻭﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺤﻲ ﻤﻨﺎﺴﺏ ﻟﻬﺎ ﺨﻼل ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺭﺓ )‪.(Ludwig, 1993‬‬
‫ﻭﻴﻌﻭﺩ ﺘﻔﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻻﺒﻲ ﻋﻥ ﺒﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺔ ﻟﻜﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻻﺒﻴﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺌﻨـﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺼﻐﻴﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺤﺠﻡ‪ ،‬ﺍﺫ ﻴﺘﺭﺍﻭﺡ ﺤﺠﻤﻬﺎ ﺒﻴﻥ ‪ 146 – 50‬ﻤﺎ ﻴﻜﺭﻭﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻁﺭﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﻴﺭ‬
‫‪158‬‬
‫ﻋﺒﺪاﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﺗﻢ ﻏﺎزي وﺟﻤﺎﻋﺘﻪ‬
‫‪-------------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﻭﻤﻥ ‪ 351 -255‬ﻤﺎ ﻴﻜﺭﻭﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻁﺭﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﻴﺭ )ﻏﺎﺯﻱ‪ ،(2005 ،‬ﻭﻫـﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﺤﺠـﻡ‬
‫ﻤﻨﺎﺴﺏ ﻟﻔﺘﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺘﺒﻁ ﺒﺩﻭﺭﺓ ﺒﺤﺠﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻨﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻬﻀﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺒﺎﻟﺘﺎﻟﻲ ﻫـﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻨـﻭﻉ ﻤـﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﺴﻬل ﺍﻟﻤﺭﻭﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻬﻀﻡ ﺩﺍﺨل ﺍﻟﻘﻨـﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻬـﻀﻤﻴﺔ )‪.(Hunter, 1981‬‬
‫ﻜﻤﺎ ﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﺭﻜﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻁﻴﺌﺔ ﻟﻬﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻻﺒﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﺤﺘﻭﺍﺌﻬﺎ ﻗﺎﺌﻤﺔ ﺠﻴﺩﺓ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻭﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺌﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻷﺤﻤﺎﺽ ﺍﻻﻤﻴﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻤـﺔ ﺴـﺎﻋﺩﺕ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺘﻔـﻭﻕ ﻫـﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻨـﻭﻉ ﻤـﻥ ﺍﻟﻐـﺫﺍﺀ‬
‫)‪.( Kassim, 1998 ; Watanbe et al., 1983‬‬
‫ﻭﺴﺒﺏ ﺘﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻓﻲ ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻁﻭل ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻐﺫﻴـﺔ ﻋﻠـﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺭﺘﻴﻤﻴﺎ ‪ A. franciscana‬ﻭ ﻤﺘﻔﺭﻉ ﺍﻟﻠﻭﺍﻤﺱ ‪ M. affinis‬ﻟﻜﻭﻥ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺌﻨـﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺘﻤﺘﻠﻙ ﻨﻔﺱ ﺍﻟﺤﺠﻡ ﺘﻘﺭﻴﺒﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻤﺭﺍﺤل ﺤﻴﺎﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻰ ﻭﺒﺎﻟﺘﺎﻟﻲ ﺘﺠﺩ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﻓﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺤﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﻴﺔ ﺒﻌﺽ ﺍﻟﺼﻌﻭﺒﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺫﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻬﻀﻡ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﻤﺎ ﺃﺸـﺎﺭﺕ ﻟـﻪ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺩﻴﺩ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻉ ﻤﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻨﺎﻭل ﻤﻥ ﻗﺒل ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻟـﻪ‬
‫ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺴﺭﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺭﻴﻎ ﻤﻥ ﺨﻼل ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﻬﻀﻡ ﻭﺍﻻﻤﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻭﺒﺎﻟﺘﺎﻟﻲ‬
‫ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻭ ) ‪.(Carvaiho et al., 1997 and Ferraris et al., 1987‬‬
‫ﻭﻴﻌﻭﺩ ﺘﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻁﻭل ﻟﻠﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻐﺫﺍﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ‬
‫‪ NRD‬ﺍﻟﻰ ﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ﻓﻲ ﻜﻭﻨﻪ ﺃﻤﺎ ﻁﺎﻓﻴﹰﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻏﺎﻁـﺴﹰﺎ ﻭﻓـﻲ ﻜﻠﺘـﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﺘﻴﻥ ﺘﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻗﺩﺭﺓ ﺠﻴﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺤﺔ ﻟﻜﻲ ﺘﺴﺘﻁﻴﻊ ﺘﻨـﺎﻭل ﻫـﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻐـﺫﺍﺀ‬
‫)ﺍﻟﺩﻫﺎﻡ‪ ،(1990 ،‬ﺇﻀﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺼﺎﺌﺹ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻤﻴﺎﺌﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻴﺯﻴﺎﺌﻴـﺔ ﻟﻠﻤـﺎﺀ‬
‫ﻷﻨﻪ ﻭﺴﻁ ﻤﻼﺌﻡ ﻟﻨﻤﻭ ﺍﻷﺤﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻬﺭﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻜﺘﻴﺭﻴﺎ ﻭﻴﺘﺴﺒﺏ ﺍﺯﺩﻫﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻨﻘﺹ ﻓـﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻭﻜﺴﺠﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺫﺍﺏ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﻴﺯﻴﺩ ﻤﻥ ﻓﺭﺹ ﺘﻌﺭﺽ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻹﺼﺎﺒﺔ ﺒﺎﻷﻤﺭﺍﺽ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﻜﺘﻴﺭﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻁﺭﻴﺔ ﻭﺒﺎﻟﺘﺎﻟﻲ ﻴﻘﻠل ﻤﻥ ﻤﻌـﺩﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻤـﻭ ﻭﻴﺯﻴـﺩ ﻨـﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻬﻼﻜـﺎﺕ‬
‫)ﻗﺎﺴﻡ ﻭﺠﻤﺎﻋﺘﻪ‪.(2002 ،‬‬
‫ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻨﻴﻪ ﻭﻨﺴﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺎﺀ ‪-:‬‬
‫ﺍﻥ ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﻴﺭﺘﺒﻁ ﺒﺸﻜل ﻋﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻟﻐـﺫﺍﺀ‬
‫ﻭﻤﺩﻯ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﻤﻥ ﻤﻜﻭﻨﺎﺘﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺌﻴﺔ )‪ .(Venugopal et al., 1990‬ﻭﻗـﺩ ﻴﻌـﻭﺩ‬
‫ﺘﻔﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻨﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻐﺫﺍﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻻﺒﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﺴـﺒﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺜـﺎﻨﻲ ﻨﺘﻴﺠـﺔ‬
‫ﻤﻼﺌﻤﺘﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺤﻴﺙ ﺍﻟﺤﺠﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﺭﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﻨﺨﻔﺎﻀﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﺴﺒﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺭﺍﺒـﻊ ﻫـﻭ‬
‫ﻟﺤﺎﺠﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻤﺘﻁﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﻏﺫﺍﺌﻴﺔ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ‪ ،‬ﺒﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻟﻭﺤﻅ ﺍﺴـﺘﻤﺭﺭ ﺍﻟﺯﻴـﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻨﻴـﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻷﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ ﻟﻐﺎﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺴﺒﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟـﺙ ﻟﻜـﻭﻥ ﻫـﺫﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺘﺤﺘﻭﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻨﺎﺼﺭ ﻏﺫﺍﺌﻴﺔ ﺠﻴﺩﺓ ﻭﻤﻨﺎﺴﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﻴﺭﻗـﺔ ﻓـﻲ ﻫـﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺤﻠـﺔ‬
‫)‪ ،(Femandez and Labarte, 1996‬ﻭﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﻤﺎ ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻗﺩﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺤﺔ‬
‫ﺭﻋﺎﻴﺔ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ‪B. sharpeyi‬‬
‫‪159‬‬
‫‪-----------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺤﺭﻜﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺭﺓ ﺠﻴﺩﻩ ﻤﻤﺎ ﻴﺠﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﻗﺎﺩﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻤﻼﺤﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻔـﺭﺍﺌﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻁﻬـﺎ‬
‫)ﺍﺤﻤﺩ‪ .(1990 ،‬ﻜﻤﺎ ﺍﻥ ﻜﺒﺭ ﺤﺠﻡ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻷﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺠﻌل ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗـﺔ ﺘﻘﻠـل ﻤـﻥ ﺍﻟﻁﺎﻗـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺭﻭﻓﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺙ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﻟﻠﻭﺼﻭل ﺍﻟﻰ ﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻹﺸﺒﺎﻉ‪ .‬ﻴﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﻥ ﻨـﺸﻴﺭ ﺍﻟـﻰ‬
‫ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻻﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﺔ ﺒﺸﻜل ﺍﻨﻔﺭﺍﺩﻱ ﻟﺘﻐﺫﻴﺔ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺴﻤﻜﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻨـﻲ ﺨـﻼل ﺍﺭﺒﻌـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﺴﺎﺒﻴﻊ ﻤﻥ ﺒﺩﺍﻴﺔ ﻋﻤﺭﻫﺎ ﻗﺩ ﺍﻅﻬﺭﺕ ﺘﺭﺍﺠﻌﹰﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻤﻌﺩﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻭﺯﻨﻴﺔ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻻﺴﺒﻭﻉ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺙ ﻭﺒﺎﻟﺘﺎﻟﻲ ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺤﺎﺠﺔ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﺠﺭﺍﺀ ﻤﺯﻴﺩ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻘﺼﺎﺀ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻁﻠﺒـﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺌﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻀﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻤﻊ ﺘﻘﺩﻡ ﻋﻤﺭ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻌﺎﺕ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺎﺀ‪:‬‬
‫ﻴﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻜل )‪ ( 4‬ﻨﺴﺏ ﻟﻠﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻐﺫﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﻨـﻭﺍﻉ‬
‫ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺤﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ﻟﻭﺤﻅ ﺘﻔﻭﻕ ﺍﻷﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﺼﻭل ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺃﻓﻀل ﻨﺴﺏ ﻟﻠﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﻭﺠﺩ ﻓﻲ ﻜﺜﻴﺭ ﻤﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ )ﻗﺎﺴﻡ ﻭﺠﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪ ;2002 ،‬ﺼﺎﻟﺢ‪ ;2005 ،‬ﻤﺎﺭﻨﺯ‪ (2005 ،‬ﻭﻴﺭﺠﻊ ﺫﻟـﻙ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻭﺍﺯﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺼﺭ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺌﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻴﺤﺘﻭﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺤﻲ ﻭﺴﻬﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻁﻪ ﻤـﻥ‬
‫ﻗﺒل ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻜﻤﺎ ﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺌﺽ ﻤﻨﻪ ﻻ ﻴﺴﺒﺏ ﻤﺸﺎﻜل ﻭﺘﺴﺘﻁﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺫﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻗﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺤﺎﺠﺔ ﺒﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺌﺽ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ﻴﻐﻴﺭ ﻜﺜﻴﺭﺍ ﻤﻥ ﺨﻭﺍﺹ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺀ ﻭﻴﻘﻠل ﻤﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻭﻜﺴﺠﻴﻥ )‪ .(Kassim et al., 1999‬ﻭﺍﻥ ﺃﺠﺭﺍﺀ ﻫـﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴـﺔ ﺘﺤـﺕ ﻅـﺭﻭﻑ‬
‫ﻤﺨﺘﺒﺭﻴﺔ ﻤﺴﻴﻁﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻨﺴﺒﻴﺎ ﺴﺎﻫﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺭﺘﻔﺎﻉ ﻨﺴﺏ ﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﻠﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﻋﻨـﺩ ﺍﺴـﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺤﻲ ﻻﻥ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﺘﻨﻌﻜﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺘﻭﺍﺠﺩ ﺍﻷﻏﺫﻴـﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻴـﺔ ﻀـﻤﻥ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺀ ﻻﻥ ﺘﻌﺭﺽ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺤﻲ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺘﻐﻴﻴﺭ ﺤﺎﺩ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺤﺩ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤـل ﻤﺜـل‬
‫ﺍﻟﺤﺭﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻭ ﻨﻘﺹ ﺍﻷﻭﻜﺴﺠﻴﻥ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺭﺘﻔﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﻤﻼﺡ ﻴﺠﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺘﻠﺘﺼﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻉ ﺍﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺠﻭﺍﻨﺏ ﻤﻤﺎ ﻴﺠﻌﻠﻬـﺎ ﻏﻴـﺭ ﻤﺘﺎﺤـﺔ ﻟﻠﻴﺭﻗـﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻗﺎﺒﻠﻴـﺔ ﺍﻟـﺴﺒﺎﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺤـﺩﻭﺩﺓ‬
‫)‪ .(Akatasu et al., 1982 ; Theilacker and Dorset, 1980‬ﻭﺍﻥ ﺘﺯﻭﻴـﺩ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺘﺒﺭ ﺒﺎﻟﻀﻭﺀ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻻﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺠﻭﺍﻨﺏ ﺴﺎﻫﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻨﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﻭﻜﺫﻟﻙ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺤﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﻭﺽ ﺒﺸﻜل ﻤﺘﺴﺎﻭﻱ ﻟﻌﺩﻡ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻋﺎﻤل ﺠﺫﺏ ﻓﻲ ﺠﻬﺔ ﻤﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻤﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺤﻭﺽ )‪ .(Ali and Ahmed, 2004‬ﺒﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻜﺎﻥ ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺘﺒﺭﻴﺔ ﻋﻠـﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻲ ﻗﻠﻴل ﻤﻤﺎ ﺍﺜﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻨﺴﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫‪160‬‬
‫ﻋﺒﺪاﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﺗﻢ ﻏﺎزي وﺟﻤﺎﻋﺘﻪ‬
‫‪-----------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺤﺼﻠﺕ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻫﻼﻜﺎﺕ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﺴﺒﻭﻉ ﺍﻷﻭل ﻤﻥ ﺒﺩﺀ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺫﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﻨﺎﺘﺞ ﻋﻥ‬
‫ﻋﺩﻡ ﻗﺩﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺫﻴﺔ ﺭﻏﻡ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻨﻬﺎ ﻏﻴﺭ ﻗـﺎﺩﺭﺓ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﻫـﻀﻡ‬
‫ﻤﻜﻭﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺒﺴﺒﺏ ﻋﺩﻡ ﺍﻜﺘﻤﺎل ﺃﺠﻬـﺯﺓ ﺍﻟﻬـﻀﻡ )‪ ،(Jones, 1972‬ﺍﻭ ﺒـﺴﺒﺏ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺠﻬﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺫﻱ ﺘﻭﺍﺠﻪ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺔ ﺇﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻘل )ﻏﺎﺯﻱ‪.(2005 ،‬‬
‫ﺒﻴﻨﺕ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻨﺔ ﺒﺎﻻ ﻤﻜﺎﻥ ﺘﻐﺫﻴﺔ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨـﻲ ﻋﻠـﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺤﻲ ﺨﻼل ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺭ ﺍﻻﻭل ﻤﻥ ﺤﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻴﺭﻗﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺤـﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻜـﻭﻥ ﻤـﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻻﺒﻲ ‪ B. calyciflorus‬ﺃﻋﻁﻰ ﺃﻓﻀل ﻤﻌﺩﻻﺕ ﻨﻤﻭ ﻭﻨﺴﺏ ﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﻓـﻲ ﺍﻷﺴـﺒﻭﻉ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻭل ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻨﻲ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺫﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﺩﺭ‬
‫ﺍﺤﻤﺩ‪ ،‬ﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﻤﺤﻤﺩ‪ .1990 ،‬ﺍﻟﻭﻓﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﻭﻉ ﻓﻲ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﻓﻲ ﺨـﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺯﺒﻴـﺭ‬
‫ﺸﻤﺎل ﻏﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺒﻲ‪ .‬ﺭﺴﺎﻟﺔ ﻤﺎﺠﺴﺘﻴﺭ‪ ،‬ﻤﺭﻜﺯ ﻋﻠﻭﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺤـﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺠﺎﻤﻌـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺭﺓ‪ 89 ،‬ﺹ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﺤﻤﺩ‪ ،‬ﻫﺎﺸﻡ ﻋﺒﺩﺍﻟﺭﺯﺍﻕ‪ .1987 ،‬ﺒﺎﻴﻭﻟﻭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺴﻤﺎﻙ‪ .‬ﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺯﺭﺍﻋﺔ‪ ،‬ﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺭﺓ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺤﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ‪ ،‬ﻤﻁﺒﻌﺔ ﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺭﺓ‪ 279 ،‬ﺹ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺩﺒﻴﻜل‪ ،‬ﻋﺎﺩل ﻴﻌﻘﻭﺏ ﻴﻭﺴﻑ‪ .1996 ،‬ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺘﻐﺫﻭﻴـﺔ ﻭﺍﻴـﻀﻴﺔ ﻟـﺼﻐﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﻨـﻲ‬
‫‪ Barbus sharpeyi‬ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻁﺎﻥ ‪ B. xanthopterus‬ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺎﺭﺏ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩﻱ‬
‫‪Cyprinus carpio‬ﺘﺤﺕ ﺍﻟﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺘﺒﺭﻴﺔ‪ .‬ﺃﻁﺭﻭﺤﺔ ﺩﻜﺘﻭﺭﺍ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﺔ‪ ،‬ﻜﻠﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺯﺭﺍﻋﺔ‪ ،‬ﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺭﺓ‪ 119 ،‬ﺹ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺩﻫﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﻨﺠﻡ ﻗﻤﺭ‪ .1990 ،‬ﺘﺭﺒﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﺴﻤﺎﻙ‪ .‬ﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺯﺭﺍﻋﺔ‪ ،‬ﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻤﻁﺒﻌﺔ ﺩﺍﺭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻤﺔ‪ 481 ،‬ﺹ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺩﻫﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﻨﺠﻡ ﻗﻤﺭ‪ .1982 ،‬ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺍﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺒﻲ‪ .‬ﺍﻟﻤﺅﺘﻤﺭ ﺍﻷﻭل‪ ،‬ﻤﻨﺸﻭﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫ﻤﺭﻜﺯ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺒﻲ‪ ،‬ﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻤﻁﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﺸﺎﺩ‪ ،‬ﺒﻐﺩﺍﺩ‪540 ،‬‬
‫ﺹ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺤﺒﻴﺏ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﺭﻭﻕ ﻤﺤﻤﻭﺩ‪ .1996 ،‬ﺍﻗﻠﻤﺔ ﻭﻤﻌﻴﺸﺔ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨـﻲ ‪Barbus sharpyei‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺤﻤﺭﻱ ‪ Barbus luteus‬ﻓﻲ ﺍﺤﻭﺍﺽ ﺍﻟﺘﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻴﺔ‪ .‬ﻤﺠﻠـﺔ ﻭﺍﺩﻱ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺭﺍﻓﺩﻴﻥ ‪.199 – 185 :(1) 11‬‬
‫‪161‬‬
‫ﺭﻋﺎﻴﺔ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ‪B. sharpeyi‬‬
‫‪-----------------------------------------------------------------‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻴﻡ‪ ،‬ﻋﺒﺩﺍﻟﻭﻫﺎﺏ ﻫﺎﺩﻱ‪ .1976 ،‬ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻭﺭﻓﻭﻟﻭﺠﻴﻪ ﻭﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﺴﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻀﺞ‬
‫ﻷﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ‪ Barbus sharpyei‬ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺒﻭﻁ ‪ .B. grypus‬ﺭﺴﺎﻟﺔ ﻤﺎﺠﺴﺘﻴﺭ‪،‬‬
‫ﻗﺴﻡ ﻋﻠﻭﻡ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﺎﺓ‪ ،‬ﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ ﺒﻐﺩﺍﺩ‪ 120 ،‬ﺹ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻭﺍﻋﺭ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻲ ﻭﺭﺤﻭﻤﻪ‪ ،‬ﻋﺒﺩﺍ ﻟﻤﺠﻴﺩ‪ .1985 ،‬ﺘﺭﺒﻴﻪ ﺴﻤﻙ ﺍﻟﻘـﺎﺭﻭﺱ ﺒﺎﻟﺠﻤﻬﻭﺭﻴـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻭﻨـﺴﻴﺔ ‪ .Dicentrachus labrax Linne‬ﻤﻌﻬـﺩ ﺍﻟﻜﻭﻴـﺕ ﻟﻸﺒﺤـﺎﺙ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻨﺸﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻭﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﻭﻴﺘﻴﺔ )‪.64-53 :(6‬‬
‫ﺼﺎﻟﺢ‪ ،‬ﺠﺎﺴﻡ ﺤﻤﻴﺩ‪ .2005 ،‬ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﺍﻻﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﻨﻤﻭ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺭﺏ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ‪ Cyprinus carpio‬ﻭﺍﻟﻌـﺸﺒﻲ‪Ctenopharygondon idella‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻀﻲ ‪ Hypophthalmichthys molitrix‬ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻅﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺌﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﻐﻠـﻕ‪.‬‬
‫ﺃﻁﺭﻭﺤﺔ ﺩﻜﺘﻭﺭﺍ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﺔ‪ ،‬ﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻭﻡ‪ ،‬ﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺭﺓ‪ 105 ،‬ﺹ‪.‬‬
‫ﻏﺎﺯﻱ‪ ،‬ﻋﺒﺩﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺤﺎﺘﻡ‪ .2005 ،‬ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻏﺫﻴﺔ ﺤﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺘﻐﺫﻴﺔ ﻴﺭﻗـﺎﺕ ﺍﺴـﻤﺎﻙ‬
‫ـﺸﺒﻲ‬
‫ـﺎﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌــ‬
‫ـﺎﺩﻱ ‪ Cyprinus carpio‬ﻭﺍﻟﻜــ‬
‫ـﺎﺭﺏ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻴــ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜــ‬
‫‪ .Ctenopharygondon idella‬ﺭﺴﺎﻟﺔ ﻤﺎﺠﺴﺘﻴﺭ‪ ،‬ﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺯﺭﺍﻋﺔ‪ ،‬ﺠﺎﻤﻌـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺭﺓ‪ 89 ،‬ﺹ‪.‬‬
‫ﻗﺎﺴﻡ‪ ،‬ﺜﺎﺌﺭ ﺇﺒﺭﺍﻫﻴﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻌﻭﺩﻱ‪ ،‬ﺨﺎﻟﺩ ﻋﺒﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﺯﻴﺯ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻜﺎﻭﻱ‪ ،‬ﻤﺭﻴﻡ ﺤﺎﺴـﻡ‪.2002 ،‬‬
‫ﺘــﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﻘــﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﻜﺒــﺔ ﻓــﻲ ﺯﻴــﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﻨﺘــﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺤﻴــﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﻟــﺩﻭﻻﺒﻲ‬
‫‪ Brachionus calycifllorus Pallas‬ﻟﺘﻐﺫﻴﻪ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺴـﻤﺎﻙ‪ .‬ﻤﺠﻠـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺯﺭﺍﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺍﻗﻴﺔ ‪.102-95 :(1) 7‬‬
‫ﻗﺎﺴﻡ‪ ،‬ﺜﺎﺌﺭ ﺍﺒﺭﺍﻫﻴﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻌﺒﻲ‪ ،‬ﻜﺭﻴﻡ ﻤﻭﺯﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺩﻟﻲ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻁﻤـﺔ ﻋﺒﺩﺍﻟﺤـﺴﻥ ﻭﻭﺸـﻴﺢ‪،‬‬
‫ﻋﻼﻫــﻥ ﻓﺎﻀــل‪ .2002 ،‬ﺯﻴــﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻨﺘــﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻜــﺎﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻌــﺸﺒﻲ‬
‫‪ Ctenopharygondon idella‬ﺒﺎﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺫﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻁﺒﻴﻌﻲ‪ .‬ﻤﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺯﺭﺍﻋـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺍﻗﻴﺔ ‪.126 -117 :(1) 7‬‬
‫ﻤﺎﺭﻨﺯ‪ ،‬ﺨﺎﻟﺩ ﻭﻟﻴﻡ ﻤﺎﻴﻜل )‪ .(2005‬ﺭﻓﻊ ﻤﻌﺩل ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﻭﻨﻤﻭ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﻜـﺎﺭﺏ‬
‫ـﺔ‬
‫ـﺴﺘﻴﺭ‪ ،‬ﻜﻠﻴـ‬
‫ـﺎﻟﺔ ﻤﺎﺠـ‬
‫ـﻀﻲ ‪ .Hypopthalmichthys molitrix‬ﺭﺴـ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔـ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺯﺭﺍﻋﺔ‪ ،‬ﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺭﺓ‪ 106 ،‬ﺹ‪.‬‬
‫ﻤﺤﻴﺴﻥ‪ ،‬ﻋﻁﺎ ﺍﷲ‪ .1980 ،‬ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﻤﻌﺎﻤل ﺍﻟﻁﻭل ﻭﻓﺘﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﺔ ﻟﻼﺴـﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺍﻗﻴـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜﻁﺎﻥ‪ B. xanthopterus .‬ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺒﻭﻁ ‪ B. grypus‬ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ ‪.B.sharpyei‬‬
‫ﻤﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺒﻲ‪ ،‬ﻤﺭﻜﺯ ﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺨﻠﻴﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺒﻲ‪ ،‬ﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺒـﺼﺭﺓ ‪12‬‬
‫)‪.221 – 215 :(1‬‬
162
‫ﻋﺒﺪاﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﺗﻢ ﻏﺎزي وﺟﻤﺎﻋﺘﻪ‬
-----------------------------------------------------------------
‫ ﺍﻻﺴﺱ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻟﺘﻜﺜﻴﺭ ﺍﻻﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺍﻗﻴـﺔ‬.1988 ،‫ ﻋﻁﺎ ﺍﷲ‬،‫ﻤﺤﻴﺴﻥ‬
‫ ﻭﺍﻟـﺸﺒﻭﻁ‬B. xanthopterus. ‫ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻁﺎﻥ‬B.sharpyei ‫ﺍﺼﻁﻨﺎﻋﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ‬
‫ ﻗﺴﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻭﺙ ﻭﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ‬،‫ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻤﺔ ﻟﺘﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺭﻭﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻜﻴﺔ‬،B. grypus
.‫ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻜﻴﺔ‬
‫ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻭﺴـﻤﻴﺔ ﻓـﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺭﻜﻴـﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻤﻴـﺎﺌﻲ‬.1988 ،‫ ﻋﺒﺩﺍﻟﻜﺭﻴﻡ ﻁﺎﻫﺭ‬،‫ﻴﺴﺭ‬
‫ ﺍﻟﺤﻤـﺭﻱ‬،‫ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﺎﺴل ﻭﻋﻼﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﺒﺩﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺎﺜﺭ ﻟﻨﻭﻋﻴﻥ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻻﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺍﻗﻴﺔ‬
‫ ﻜﻠﻴـﺔ‬،‫ ﺭﺴﺎﻟﺔ ﻤﺎﺠﺴﺘﻴﺭ‬،‫ ﻓﻲ ﻫﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺤﻤﺎﺭ‬B.sharpyei ‫ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ‬B.luteus
.‫ ﺹ‬110 ،‫ ﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺭﺓ‬،‫ﺍﻟﺯﺭﺍﻋﺔ‬
Akatsu, S., Al Abdul – Elah, K.M., Ghazai, N. and Teng, S.K. 1982. Effects
of salinity and water temperature on larvae rearing and fingerling
production of Hamoor (Epinepheius tauvina). Annual Research
Report, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, 56-59.
Ali, M.H. and Ahmed, H.K. 2004. The effect of the light and the color of
surface on the larvae settlement of Balanus amphitrite. Marina
Mesopotamica, 19 (2): 247 – 255.
Al- Hazzaa, R. and Hussein, A. 2006. Larval development of Himri, Barbus
luteus (Cyprinidae: Cypriniformes) reared in the laboratory. Turk J.
Zool. 30: 1 – 7.
Backman, W.C. 1962. The freshwater fishes of Syria and their general
Biology and management . Rome, F. A.O. ,Fisheries Biology branch.
Technical. paper. No.8 pp.29.
Carvalho, A.P., Escaffer, A. M., Oliva Teles, A. and Bergot, P. 1997. First
Feeding of common carp larvae on diets with high levels of protein
Hydrobiology sates. Aquaculture International, 5:361-367.
FAO 1999. Fishery country profile . FID / cp / IRQ Rev.2.
FAO, 2004. The state of world fisheries and aquculture fisheries Department
Rome. ISSN: 1020 – 5429,152 P.
Fernadez - Reiriz, M.J. and Labarta, U. 1996. Lipid classes and fatty acid
composition of rotifer Brachionus plicatilis fed two alga diets.
Hydrobiologia, 330: 73 – 79.
B. sharpeyi ‫ﺭﻋﺎﻴﺔ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ‬
163
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ferraris, R.P, Tan, J.D. and Drlacraz, M.C. 1987. Development of the
digestive tract of Milk fish Chanos chanos. Histol. Histoch.
Aquaculture, 61: 241 – 257.
Hunter, J.R. 1981. The feeding behavior and ecology of marine fish larvae
.ICLARM. Conf. Proc, 5: 287-330.
Hussein, S.A., Al-Daham, N.K. and Al-Dubaikal, A.Y. 2001. Oxygen
consumption andammonia excretion of fingerlings of native Cypinids
(Barbus sharpyei and B. xanthopterus) compared to common carp
(Cyprinus carpio). Marina Mesopotamica. 16 (1): 115-128.
Jones, A. 1972. Studies on egg development and larvae rearing of turbot
(Scophthalmus aximus) and brill (Scophthalmus rhombus) in the
laboratory .J.Mar. Biol. U.K. 52: 965-986.
Kassim, T.I. 1998. Production of some phyto- and zooplankton and their use
as live food for fish larvae. Ph.D. thesis, Basrah Univ., 55pp.
Kassim, T.I., Al-Saadi, H.A. and Salman, N.A. 1999. Production of some
phyto- and zooplankton and their use as live food for fish larvae.
Iraqi J. Agri. (special issue), 4 (5): 188-201.
Kassim, T.I., Salman, N.A., Al-Lami, A., Muften, S., Abood, S.M. and
Shkaer, H.K. 1998. The use of locally live food and artificial diet for
feeding cyprinid larvae in Iraq. Marine Mesopotamica, 13(1): 77-90.
Long,Y., Huang, X.F., Jin, H.J. and Liu, J.K. 2001. The effect of food
concentration on the life hostory of three types of Brachionus
plicatilis female, International rev. Hydrobiologia, 86 (2): 211 –217.
Ludwig, G.M. 1993. Effects of trichlorfon, fenthion and diflubenzuron on
the zooplankton community and on production of reciprocal- cross
hybrid striped bass fry in culture ponds. Aquaculture, 110: 301-319.
Salman, N.A., Al-Mahdawi,G.J., Kittan, S.A., Al-Redayney. A.J. and
Habba, M.K. 1993. Acclimation of carp,Bunni, and Gattan of the
draing water of Saddams river using concret ponds. Marine
Mesopotamica, 8(2): 190 – 201.
164
‫ﻋﺒﺪاﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﺗﻢ ﻏﺎزي وﺟﻤﺎﻋﺘﻪ‬
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Singh, R.P. and Srivastava, A.K. 1985. Satiation time gastric evacuation and
appetite revival in Heteropneustes fossilis. Aquaculture, 49:307– 313.
Teng, S.K., Akatsu, S., El-Zahr, C., Al- Abdul- Ellah, K.M. and Abdallah,
M. 1985. Preliminary observations on the relative growth and
production of Sobaity (Acantheopagrus cuvieri) cultured in open
circulation tanks at three stocking densities. Kuwait Institute for
Scientific Research. Kuwait, Bull. Mar. Sci., 6: 95 – 107.
Theilacker, G. and Dorsey, K. 1980. Larvae fish diversity a summary of
laboratory and field research. IOC Workshop Rep. 28: 105 – 142 .
Venugopal, G.;George, J.P. and Venkateshvaran, K. 1990. Effect of amino
acid and vitamin B on growth and survival of Labeo rohita and Catla
catla seed in nursery ponds. Carp – seed – Production Technology, 2:
69 – 75.
Voldin, V.W. and Ivanova, M.N. 1973. Morph metric associated with size
and age of Smelts Osmerus eparlanus. J. Ichthyol. 13(5): 731 – 741.
Wang, J., Zia, X. and Zhang, Q. 1992. A research on rearing of common
carp, bighead carp and grass carp fry by natural food . J. Dalian
Fisheries, 7 2/3.: 65-71.
Watanabe, T., Kitajima, C. and Fujita, S. 1983. Nutritional value of live
organisms used in Japan for mass proagation of fish. Aquaculture,
34: 115-143.
B. sharpeyi ‫ﺭﻋﺎﻴﺔ ﻴﺭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻲ‬
165
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Rearing of The larvae of Bunni (Barbus sharpeyi) on live
under laboratory condition
*A.H. Ghazi; **S.S. Al – Noor; M.F. Abaas; and ِM.H. Ali
Basrha Univ., Marine Science Center, Department of Biology
** Basrha Univ. Agric. Col. Dept. Fisheries and Marine resources
*E. mail: abdulhussein73@yahoo.com
Abstract: Indoor rearing of newly hatched Bunni larvae Barbus
sharpeyi were carried out at the Marine Science Center in April
2005. Larvae were reared under controlled condition. These
larvae fed on three food types, live food: the Rotifer Brachionus
calyciflorus, the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana, the
Cladocera Moina affinis, and artificial food NRD. The results
showed that rearing of larvae during 28 days gave high growth
rate and survival rate of fish larvae fed on live food compared
with those fed on artificial feed. The average of length and
weight of fish larvae fed on B. calyciflorus were 41.9 mm
/larvae and 113.5 mg /larvae, respectively, whereas the average
of lengths and weights of larvae fed on A. franciscana were
37.7mm / larvae and 110.2 mg / larvae, respectively, and those
fed on M. affinis were 33.5 mm / larvae and 94.6 mg / larvae in
terms of length and weight, respectively. The average length and
weight result from artificial food NRD, were 28.4 mm / larvae
and 83.6 mg / larvae, respectively. The survival rate was higher
on rotifer treatment (82.5 %), whereas lower value were
recorded (75.9, 74.6 and 62.4 %) for A. franciscana, M. affinis
and NRD, respectively.