Experiences of Successful Partnering

The Climate Resilience Toolkit and the
Water Utility and Planning Communities:
Experiences of Successful Partnering
Nancy Beller-Simms, Ph.D.
Program Manager, NOAA CPO,
Sectoral Applications Research Program
CPASW - Las Cruces, New Mexico
March 24, 2015
This talk is based on experiences with building
the water sector of the Climate Resilience Toolkit
Some Background:
•Climate Resilience Toolkit – Water Sector
•Extreme Events Study
•Extreme Precipitation Dashboard
First Thoughts on Developing Partners
Partnerships are serendipity;
they depend upon: showing up,
listening, observing, challenging,
and caring.
They are cultivated – not developed over night.
For large scale activities (e.g., this toolkit) – scale,
geography, draw and influence matter.
Personal relationships also matter.
Current Partners for the “Dashboard”
• American Planning Association (APA): James Schwab
• American Water Works Association (AWWA): Adam
Carpenter
• Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies (AMWA):
Erica Brown
• Water Environment Federation (WEF): Claudio Ternieden
• Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF): Katy
Lackey
• Water Research Foundation (WRF): Kenan Ozekin
Good Partnerships
• evolve with: substance, people, and goals.
• result from acceptance of differing views as
everyone interprets the world differently
Developing the Extreme Events Dashboard
General Approach:
• Meet regularly.
• Agree upon goals.
• Re-evaluate goals.
Specific Approach:
• Better understand population.
• Develop survey.
• Identify most relevant constituents (avoided
member fatigue) for inclusion in survey.
The Survey
Survey Statistics and Participants
 Online for 2 weeks, 11 multi-layered questions
 Sent to 745 people
Institution
Date Sent
Target Group
AMWA
16-Oct
Sustainability Committee
56
APA
16-Oct
Hazard Mitigation & Disaster Recovery
Interest Group
250
AWWA
20-Oct
Climate Change Committee
150
WERF
15-Oct
Climate Change Listserv
264
WRF (WaterRF)
15-Oct
Selected group w/CC interest
25
TOTAL
# of Participants
745
 66 responses  10 thrown out = 56 TOTAL
 34 completed ALL questions
Slides liberally “borrowed” from: Katy Lackey, Water Environmental Research Foundations
What institutions were participants from?
Water supply/distribution
Local government
Wastewater collection
Other
Stormwater manager
Planning agency
Watershed/river commission
State government
Federal agency
Academic Institution
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Percent belonging to institution
60%
Use of Climate Information
Frequent (50%+)
1. Understanding risk for water supply
2. Infrastructure/capital investments
3. Operational purposes
Frequent/Occasional (50%+)
4. Prepare hazard mitigation/climate adaptation
5. Develop impact reports & risk assessments
6. Plan extreme events
7. Plan explicit forecast
8. Plan emergency/long-term response
9. Other purposes
Don’t Use/May in Future (50%+)
10. Rebuilding following an extreme event
Sources, Scales, Types and Forms
Where do you obtain climate/weather data?
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
84%
58%
53%
49%
49%
NWS, NCDC,
NOAA
Northwest
RISA
27%
4%
Source of information
Universities,
local
emergency
management,
blogs
Using the survey results, we brought scientists and
representatives from the foundations together to discuss
what would be practical in a dashboard.
We are currently developing the dashboard.
We anticipate that it will include data sets for:
• climate stressors (e.g., monthly normals & extremes);
• people and assets (e.g., soil moisture index,
vulnerability index)
• forecasts (e.g., 6-10 day precip and temp).
Next Steps
• Dashboard
• Climate Resilience Toolkit
• Educational Activities (combining with new partners)
• Teacher inclusion in CRT case studies
Successful Partnerships
1. are serendipity; they depend upon: showing up,
listening, observing, challenging, and caring.
2. evolve with: substance, people, and goals.
3. result from acceptance of differing views as
everyone interprets the world differently
4. combine viewpoints which often result in
practical, cutting edge, and innovative solutions
Thank you!
More Information:
Nancy Beller-Simms
Nancy.beller-simms@noaa.gov
301-734-1205
Next Steps: Barriers & Tools
Lack of training/education is primary barrier (50%)
1.
2.
3.
4.
Managing/processing data
Understanding/interpretation non-climate professional
Modeling skills
Downsizing forecasts to local scale
*Other barriers: access, local skepticism
Use of Climate Info
 71% currently use for planning purposes
 Of the 29% that do not:
 38% plan to use in the future
 44% might use in the future
Reasons for Not Using Climate Info
Institutional support/capacity
Uncertainty in CC/impacts
Other
Next Steps: Barriers and Tools
63% say data needs will change in future:
Changing Needs
Refine & update
Access
Short-term
needs
Long-term needs
Needed formats vary  data maps, GeoTiff, KML among
most popular
Next Steps: Barriers & Tools
Future products or tools:
 Adjustments / updates to existing tools
 Precipitation data to assist design
 All data in one place
 Economic impact indicator
 Timeframe assessment for climate change
 No new tools, just better access
Sources, Scales, Types and Forms
Level of Need
Time Scales
Most
critical
Foresee
Not
Helpful critical at critical in
future
present
Planning Purpose
(most common identified)
Minutes to hours
37%
17%
39%
7%
Immediate response (54%)
Hours to a day
37%
34%
24%
5%
Short-term (39%)
A day to several days
33%
50%
10%
8%
Short-term (49%)
Days to weeks
20%
61%
15%
5%
Medium (39%)
Weeks to months
15%
66%
15%
5%
Medium (56%)
Months to years (seasonal)
24%
60%
12%
5%
Long-term (55%)
Years to decades
18%
58%
18%
8%
Long-term (84%)
Decades to centuries
3%
45%
50%
3%
Long-term (64%)