1. religion and spirituality
2. buddhism

20131202c.pdf
IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program
Research Report Cover Sheet
Trial: 2013 OH
Researcher(s) Hannah Mathers
Ohio State University
Affiliation:
248C Howlett Hall, 2001 Fyffe Ct
Columbus
OH
PhoneNumber: (614) 247-6195
mathers.7@osu.edu
Email:
ProjectTitle:
Protocol #:
43210-1096
Acetic Acid Crop Safety
13-015
PR#
Research Target
Crop/Plant
Product
EPA Reg. # Production Site
30135
Phytotoxicity
Japanese Barberry
Weed Pharm
81936-1
Phytotoxicity
Berberis thunbergii
Acetic acid
Pharm Solution
Phytotoxicity
Fern, Autumn & Wood
Weed Pharm
81936-1
Phytotoxicity
Dryopteris sp.
Acetic acid
Pharm Solution
Phytotoxicity
Golden Bells
Weed Pharm
81936-1
Phytotoxicity
Forsythia sp.
Acetic acid
Pharm Solution
30822
Phytotoxicity
Phytotoxicity
Mallow, Rose Mallow
Hibiscus sp.
30823
Phytotoxicity
Phytotoxicity
30133
30133
Status
Greenhouse
C
Greenhouse
C
Field Container
C
Weed Pharm
Acetic acid
81936-1
Field Container
Pharm Solution
C
Hosta
Weed Pharm
81936-1
Greenhouse
C
Hosta sp.
Acetic acid
Pharm Solution
Phytotoxicity
Phytotoxicity
Hydrangea
Hydrangea sp.
Weed Pharm
Acetic acid
81936-1
Greenhouse
Pharm Solution
C
Phytotoxicity
Hydrangea
Weed Pharm
81936-1
Greenhouse
C
Phytotoxicity
Hydrangea sp.
Acetic acid
Pharm Solution
Phytotoxicity
Lilyturf, Creeping
Weed Pharm
81936-1
Greenhouse
C
Phytotoxicity
Liriope sp.
Acetic acid
Pharm Solution
30132
Phytotoxicity
Phytotoxicity
Lilac
Syringa sp.
Weed Pharm
Acetic acid
81936-1
Greenhouse
Pharm Solution
C
30829
Phytotoxicity
Arrowwood
Weed Pharm
81936-1
C
Phytotoxicity
Viburnum sp.
Acetic acid
Pharm Solution
30814
30818
30638
ProjectTitle:
Protocol #:
Flumioxazin Crop Safety
13-015
PR#
Research Target
Crop/Plant
Product
30143
Phytotoxicity
Japanese Barberry
SureGuard 51WDG
59639-120
Phytotoxicity
Berberis thunbergii
Flumioxazin
Valent
Phytotoxicity
Boxwood, Japanese
SureGuard 51WDG
59639-120
Phytotoxicity
Buxus microphylla
Flumioxazin
Valent
30893
Phytotoxicity
Phytotoxicity
Fern, Autumn & Wood
Dryopteris sp.
SureGuard 51WDG
Flumioxazin
20514
Phytotoxicity
Golden Bells
Phytotoxicity
Forsythia sp.
30810
Phytotoxicity
Phytotoxicity
30916
30142
30141
Greenhouse
EPA Reg. # Production Site
Status
Greenhouse
C
Greenhouse
C
59639-120
Valent
Greenhouse
C
SureGuard 51WDG
59639-120
Field Container
C
Flumioxazin
Valent
Mallow, Rose Mallow
Hibiscus sp.
SureGuard 51WDG
Flumioxazin
59639-120
Valent
Field Container
C
Phytotoxicity
Hosta
SureGuard 51WDG
59639-120
Greenhouse
C
Phytotoxicity
Hosta sp.
Flumioxazin
Valent
Phytotoxicity
Hydrangea
SureGuard 51WDG
59639-120
Greenhouse
C
Phytotoxicity
Hydrangea sp.
Flumioxazin
Valent
Orrnamental Horticulture Pro
ogram
Researc
ch Report Form
Rese
earcher:
Project Title:
Prottocol #:
Date:
Dr. Hannah Mathers
M
Liverwort Prroduct Crop Safety
S
13-015
p1
11/20/2013
PRnumb
bers: 301422, 30134, 301443, 30135, 300895, 30818,
30141, 300133, 30902, 30822, 301400, 30132, 301147, 30829
Narrrative Summ
mary (Resullts/Discussion)
Pleasse keep text to
o one page iff possible.
p
Incllude summaryy of trial resuults and a brieef discussion including how
w any
changes from the protocol
p
mayy have affected
d results. Ressults for multip
iple PRnumbeers can be sum
mmarized toggether, but
pleasse list all PRN
Numbers in th
he header and
d in the summary data tablle.
Flum
mioxazin (SureeGuard 51 WDG)
W
at 4 oz/aac and acetic acid (WeedP harm) at 10%
% v/v were applied to seleccted
ornam
mental cultivaars (see table below) durin
ng dormant an
nd non-dormaant growth periods to deterrmine phytotooxicity on the
cropss and efficacy
y to liverwort at three locattions in Michigan and Ohi o. Locations included Sprring Meadow Nursery and
Northhland Farms near
n Grand Haven,
H
MI; an
nd Decker’s Nursery
N
near G
Groveport, OH
H.
Flum
mioxazin can be
b applied as a dormant ap
pplication to several
s
of the species testedd with mimim
mal injury, inccluding
Syrinnga meyeri ‘P
Paliban’ and Syringa
S
‘Misss Kim’; Hydra
angea panicu lata ‘Limeligght’; Berberiss ‘Orange Roccket’; Buxus
‘Winntergem’; and
d Hydrangea ‘Incrediball’.
‘
However, alll of the speci es tested (witth the exception of the Syriinga species
becauuse a reappliccation was no
ot performed) were injured by a second application of flumioxazinn during activve growth.
Forsyythia ‘Showo
off Sugar Baby’ and viburn
num dentatum
m ‘Blue muffinn’ showed soome injury froom flumioxazzin shortly
after the first application, which
h was primarily in the form
m of delayed bud break.
WeeddPharm perfo
ormed similarr to the flumio
oxazin in thatt it can be appplied as a dorm
mant applicattion to many sspecies; from
m
thesee trials it could be sprayed on Hydrangeea ‘Incrediballl’; Hydrangeaa paniculata ‘Limelight’; Hibiscus syriiacus ‘Blue
satin’; forsythia ‘S
Showoff Sugaar Baby’ and viburnum den
ntatum ‘Blue muffin’. However, also juust like flumiioxazin, all
speciies tested werre injury by th
he 2nd applicaation which occcurred duringg active grow
wth.
Bothh flumioxazin and WeedPh
harm controlleed liverwort; however,
h
flum
mioxazin has more residuaal than WeedP
Pharm (see
table below) and better
b
overall control. WeeedPharm willl control liverrwort very weell, but coveraage is essentiaal.
Appllications of WeedPharm
W
du
uring active growth
g
are phy
ytotoxic and less efficacioous.
Resu
ults Table
Pleasse insert resu
ults table heree. Include PRn
numbers for each
e
treatmennt if multiple P
PRnumbers aare included iin this
summ
mary. Please include produ
uct, active ing
gredient, and statistics.
Tablle 1. Phytotoxicity on selecte
ed ornamentals and liverwort control at Sppring Meadow Nursery Hydrrangea paniculata 'Limelightt' Treaatment 1 WATz yx
4 o
oz/ac 0.1
0.0
10%
% v/v 0.0
‐‐ 2 WA
AT 0.2 0.1 0.2 4 WATT 0.0 1.8 0.0 6 WAT
0.0 0.6 0.0 Hibsscus syriacus 'B
Blue Satin' Treaatment Rate R
1 W
WAT 2.1
SureeGuard 4 o
oz/ac ** 0.1
WeeedPharm 10%
% v/v 0.0 Untrreated ‐‐ 2 WA
AT 2.1 ** 0.2 0.0 4 WATT 2.1 ** *
0.4 0.2 Forssythia 'Show Offf Sugar Baby' Treaatment Rate R
1 W
WAT 3.1
SureeGuard 4 o
oz/ac ** 0.0
WeeedPharm 10%
% v/v 0.0 Untrreated ‐‐ 2 WA
AT 2.1 0.5 1.0 4 WATT 1.9 0.4 1.4 SureeGuard WeeedPharm Untrreated Rate R
9 WAT 5.6 ** 3.4 ** 1.7 10 WAT 4.9 ** 3.6 ** 1.2 12 WAT 2.7 ** 2.5 ** 0.0 6 WAT
8 WAT 1.2 *** 1.5 ** 0.9 1.1 ** 0.0 0.0 9 WAT 3.9 ** 3.1 ** 0.0 10 WAT 4.3 ** 1.5 ** 0.0 12 WAT 5.5 ** 2.5 ** 0.0 6 WAT
2.3 0.3 2.3 9 WAT 5.0 4.2 2.2 10 WAT 5.6
4.2
2.0 12 WAT 5.2
3.9
2.0 8 WAT 0.0 0.0 0.0 8 WAT 2.0 0.0 1.4 Orrnamental Horticulture Pro
ogram
Researc
ch Report Form
Rese
earcher:
Project Title:
Prottocol #:
Liverwort control Treaatment Rate R
SureeGuard WeeedPharm Untrreated Date:
Dr. Hannah Mathers
M
Liverwort Prroduct Crop Safety
S
13-015
Vibu
urnum dentatu
um 'Blue Muffin
n' Treaatment Rate R
1 W
WAT 2.1 ** SureeGuard 4 o
oz/ac 0.1 WeeedPharm 10%
% v/v 0.0 Untrreated ‐‐ 1 W
WAT wv
4 o
oz/ac 7.5
b 9.8
10%
% v/v a 0.0
‐‐ e p2
11/20/2013
PRnumb
bers: 301422, 30134, 301443, 30135, 300895, 30818,
30141, 300133, 30902, 30822, 301400, 30132, 301147, 30829
2 WA
AT 2.5 ** 0.0 0.3 4 WATT 1.5 * *
0.0 0.3 6 WAT
8 WAT 0.8 *** 0.4 1.1 ** 0.1 0.0 0.0 9 WAT 2.8 ** 3.4 ** 0.0 10 WAT 3.9 ** 2.1 ** 0.2 12 WAT 3.3 ** 2.6 ** 0.1 2 WA
AT 9.8 a 9.5 a 0.0 d 4 WATT 9.5 a a
8.6 b b
0.0 e e
6 WAT
9.6 a
7.9 b
0.0 e
9 WAT 9.9 a 8.6 b 1.1 e 10 WAT 9.8 a 9.0 a 3.7 c 12 WAT 9.9 a 9.0 a 3.4 c 8 WAT 9.8 a 7.5 b
0.0 e z = w
weeks after tre
eatment y = P
Phytotoxicity R
Ratings based o
on a 0‐10 scale with 0 being n
no phytotoxicitty and 10 deatth with ≤3 com
mmercially acceeptable. x = P
Phytotoxicity raatings followed
d by *,** are significantly diffferent from coontrol based on
n Dunnett's t‐ttest (α = 0.10, 0
0.05, resp
pectively). w = Liverwort conttrol ratings folllowed by the ssame letter in tthe same colum
mn are not sign
nificantly different, based on
n lsmeans (α 05) = 0.0
v = LLiverwort control ratings base
ed on a 0‐10 sccale with 0 being no control and 10 perfectt control with ≥≥7 commercially acceeptable.  in
ndicates reappllication at this date Tablle 2. Phytotoxicity on selecte
ed ornamentals and liverwort control at Noorthland Farmss nga meyeri 'Paaliban' Syrin
Rate Treaatment 2 WA
AT
4 W
WAT
66 WAT
1 WATz SureeGuard 4 oz/ac Untrreated ‐‐ Syrin
nga 'Miss Kim' Treaatment Rate ‐‐ ‐‐ 4 oz/ac ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ SureeGuard Untrreated Liverwort control Treaatment Rate SureeGuard 4 oz/ac Untrreated ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ 1 WAT ‐‐ ‐‐ 2 WA
AT
‐‐ ‐‐ 0.8 0.0 66 WAT
0.0 0.0 4 W
WAT
‐‐ ‐‐ 8 WAT
0.0 0.0 yx
8 WAT
1.8 ** 0.0 1 WAT 7.5wv bc 5.5 d 2 WA
AT 7.3
3 ab
2 c 4.2
4 W
WAT 7.9 a
44.8 b 66 WAT 7.3 b 5.7 c 8 WAT 6.2 bc
5.0 c z = w
weeks after tre
eatment y = P
Phytotoxicity R
Ratings based o
on a 0‐10 scale with 0 being n
no phytotoxicitty and 10 deatth with ≤3 com
mmercially acceeptable. x = P
Phytotoxicity raatings followed
d by *,** are significantly diffferent from coontrol based on
n Dunnett's t‐ttest (α = 0.10
0, 0.05, respecttively). w = Liverwort conttrol ratings folllowed by the ssame letter in tthe same colum
mn are not sign
nificantly different, based on lssmeans (α = 0.05) Orrnamental Horticulture Pro
ogram
Researc
ch Report Form
Rese
earcher:
Project Title:
Prottocol #:
Dr. Hannah Mathers
M
Liverwort Prroduct Crop Safety
S
13-015
Date:
p3
11/20/2013
PRnumb
bers: 301422, 30134, 301443, 30135, 300895, 30818,
30141, 300133, 30902, 30822, 301400, 30132, 301147, 30829
v = LLiverwort control ratings base
ed on a 0‐10 sccale with 0 being no control and 10 perfectt control with ≥≥7 com
mmercially acce
eptable. Tablle 3. Phytotoxicity on selecte
ed ornamentals at Decker's N
Nursery Berb
beris 'Orange R
Rocket' 1 WAT Rate Treaatment 2 WAT 4 WAT SureeGuard WeeedPharm Untrreated 4 oz/ac 10% v/v ‐‐ Buxu
us 'Wintergem' Treaatment SureeGuard WeeedPharm Untrreated Rate 4 oz/ac 10% v/v ‐‐ Hydrrangea 'Incred
diball' Treaatment Rate 4 oz/ac SureeGuard 10% v/v WeeedPharm ‐‐ Untrreated yx
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8 W
WAT 1.9
9 ** 0.0
2.0
0 ** 0.0
0.0
0 0.00 9 WA
AT 10 WAT 2.6 ** 2.7 ** 8.7 ** 7.7 ** 0.0 0.0 12 WAT 4.0 ** 2.8
0.0
** 1 WAT 2 WAT 4 WAT 8 W
WAT 9 WA
AT 10 WAT 0.7 0.6 0.7
3.1 ** 7 0.2
0.9 2.9 ** 6.0 ** 5.2 ** 5.3
** 5.7 ** 6.4 ** 0.6 0.6 0.7
7 0.00 0.0 0.0 12 WAT 3.0 ** 5.8 ** 0.0 1 WAT 0.0 0.0 0.0 12 WAT 9.9 ** 4.9
5.0 2 WAT 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 WAT 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 8 W
WAT 2.0
2.0
0.00 9 WA
AT 9.8 ** 7.2 ** 0.0 10 WAT 9.3 ** 8.1 ** 0.0 z = w
weeks after tre
eatment y = P
Phytotoxicity R
Ratings based o
on a 0‐10 scale with 0 being n
no phytotoxicitty and 10 deatth with ≤3 com
mmercially acceeptable. x = P
Phytotoxicity raatings followed
d by *,** are significantly diffferent from coontrol based on
n Dunnett's t‐ttest (α = 0.10, 0.05
5, respectively).  in
ndicates reappllication at this date Orrnamental Horticulture Pro
ogram
Researc
ch Report Form
Rese
earcher:
Project Title:
Prottocol #:
Dr. Hannah Mathers
M
Liverwort Prroduct Crop Safety
S
13-015
Date:
p4
11/20/2013
PRnumb
bers: 301422, 30134, 301443, 30135, 300895, 30818,
30141, 300133, 30902, 30822, 301400, 30132, 301147, 30829
Mate
erials & Metthods/Reco
ordkeeping
Pleasse fill out the information below
b
or atta
ach a separatee document w
with comparabble informatioon.
See aattached files for all pertineent informatio
on.
me(s) of Pers
sonnel Conducting Rese
earch: Dr. Haannah Mathers and Luke Case
Nam
Loca
ation of Trial (city/state): Click here to
o enter text.
Use Site (greenh
house/shade
ehouse/field container/etc): Click herre to enter text..
Crop
p History
Crop Cultiva
ar/Variety:
Date of See
eding:
Date of Emergence:
Date of Transplanting:
Potting Mix:
Pot size & spacing:
s
Row spacin
ng:
Click herre to enter text.
Click herre to enter text.
Click herre to enter text.
Click herre to enter text.
Click herre to enter text.
Click herre to enter text.
Click herre to enter text.
duct(s) applie
ed prior to sttart of experriment:
Prod
Appliication
Product
Rate
Type
A
Add more row
ws as needed.
D
Date of
Application
A
Crop Groowth
Stage
A
Application
V
Volume
Orrnamental Horticulture Pro
ogram
Researc
ch Report Form
Rese
earcher:
Project Title:
Prottocol #:
Date:
Dr. Hannah Mathers
M
Liverwort Prroduct Crop Safety
S
13-015
Expe
eriment Info
ormation
E
Experimenta
al Design:
N
Number of Reps:
R
p5
11/20/2013
PRnumb
bers: 301422, 30134, 301443, 30135, 300895, 30818,
30141, 300133, 30902, 30822, 301400, 30132, 301147, 30829
Click heere to enter teext.
Click heere to enter teext.
M
Materials & Methods:
M
IInsert materia
als & methodss here only iff information is
i not presentted elsewheree.
IInclude any ch
hanges from protocol.
p
C
Click here to enter
e
text.
A
Application Equipment:
E
t enter text.
Click here to
P
Product(s) applied during
g experimen
nt (including treatments, fertilizers, e
etc):
Rate(s)
D
Date of
Product
Appliication
Crop Groowth
Application
Type
A
Stage
A
Application
V
Volume
flumioxazin
WeedPharm
4 oz/ac
10% v/v
OTT - liquid
OTT - liquid
22/28/13
22/28/13
dormant
dormant
100 gal/ac
100 gal/ac
flumioxazin
WeedPharm
4 oz/ac
10% v/v
OTT - liquid
OTT - liquid
5/2/13
5/2/13
Active groowth
Active groowth
100 gal/ac
100 gal/ac
A
Add more row
ws as needed.
Phottos
Pleasse embed pho
otos here or seend jpg, tiff, or
o bmp.
Data
a Collected
Pleasse describe da
ata collected and scoring system.
s
Also include
i
the daates data werre collected.
Clickk here to enterr text.
Raw
w Data
Inserrt raw data beelow or send separate
s
file containing
c
ra
aw data.
Pleasse see other fiiles
Orrnamental Horticulture Pro
ogram
Researc
ch Report Form
Rese
earcher:
Project Title:
Prottocol #:
Dr. Hannah Mathers
M
Liverwort Prroduct Crop Safety
S
13-015
Date:
p6
11/20/2013
PRnumb
bers: 301422, 30134, 301443, 30135, 300895, 30818,
30141, 300133, 30902, 30822, 301400, 30132, 301147, 30829
Environmental conditions
c
du
uring the exp
periment:
Inserrt temperaturee, precipitatio
on and/or irriigation, and relative
r
humiddity with a miinimum of higgh, low and avverage daily
temperatures. Or send separatee file with thiss information
n.
Incluude a statemen
nt about any significant
s
weeather or envvironmental evvents during the course off the experimeent.
Clickk here to enterr text.
Liverworrt Study - Michigan
Materialss and Methods. Trials were
w set up att two nurseri
ries which inncluded Sprinng Meadow
Nursery and
a Northlan
nd Farms neear Grand Haaven, MI to ddetermine coontrol of liveerwort and
phytotox
xicity from seeveral herbiccide treatmen
nts. SureGuuard (flumioxxazin, Valennt U.S.A.) att 4
oz/ac, WeedPharm
W
(P
Pharm Soluttions, Inc.) att 10% v/v w
were applied with a CO2 bbackpack typpe
sprayer set
s to deliverr 50 gal/ac with
w 8004 Teejet vs nozzlles. Protocool required 100 gal/ac, soo two
passes were made to deliver the required
r
volu
ume. Speciees selected foor phytotoxiccity at Sprinng
Meadow included Hyydrangea pa
aniculata ‘Liimelight’, Hi
Hibiscus ‘Satiin blue’, Forrsythia ‘Show
w off
Sugar Baaby’, and Vib
burnum denttatum ‘Blue Muffin’. Alll species at Spring Meaadow were juust
coming out
o of dormaancy, i.e. bud
d swell. All species werre in 4” pots at Spring M
Meadow. Speecies
selected for
f phytotox
xicity at Nortthland Farm
ms included SSyringa ‘Misss Kim’ and Syringa meyyeri
‘Paliban’’. Both speciies of Syring
ga were dorm
mant at time of applicatioon. All speccies were in plug
trays at Northland
N
Faarms.
Applicatiions were ap
pplied on 7 March
M
2013 at both sitess. Spring Meeadow is a ppropagation
nursery, so the enviro
onment was more regulaated than thee environmennt at Northlaand Farms. T
The
environm
ment at Sprin
ng Meadow on
o the first application
a
w
was approxim
mately 60 °F
F with high
humidity
y in a greenhouse. The environment
e
at Northlandd Farms wass approximaately 45 °F w
with
high hum
midity in a co
overed hoop house. SureeGuard at 4 oz/ac and thhe WeedPharrm at 10% vv/v
was reapplied on 2 May
M 2013 [8 WA1T (weeeks after firsst treatment)] at Spring M
Meadow only.
Evaluatio
ons consisted
d of visual raatings of botth weed conttrol and phyytotoxicity too crop speciees.
Visual raatings of liveerwort contro
ol were baseed on a 0-10 scale with 0 being no coontrol and 100
perfect co
ontrol with ≥7
≥ commerccially acceptaable. Visuall ratings of pphytotoxicityy were basedd on
a scale off 0-10 with 0 being no phytotoxicity
y and 10 deatth with ≤3 commerciallyy acceptable.
Trials weere set up in a completely
y randomizeed design forr each speciees.
Fig. 11. Hydrangeea paniculataa treated witth
SureG
Guard at Sprring Meadow
w Nursery w
were
slighttly behind thhe untreated plants; howeever,
controol of liverwoort was exceellent at 3 W
WAT.
Fig. 2.. Hydrangeaa panicula trreated with
WeedP
Pharm (left) in comparisson to the unntreated
controol (right) at 3 WAT at Sppring Meadoow
Nurserry. Notice bbreakthroughh of liverworrt.
F
Fig. 3 Liverrwort controol and damagge on
F
Forsythia from 2nd (nonn-dormant) appplication
oof WeedPhaarm at Springg Meadow N
Nursery.
Figure 4.
4 SureGuarrd on Syring
ga at Northlaand Farms att 8 WAT. A
Although therre were no
visible signs of inju
ury, plants were
w slightly behind the uuntreated plaants.
Liverworrt study – Oh
hio
Materialss and Methods. SureGuaard and WeeedPharm werre applied inn the same m
manner as abbove
at Decker’s Nursery near Grovep
port, OH on 28 Februaryy 2013. Speccies selectedd for
phytotox
xicity includeed Berberis thunbergii
t
‘O
Orange Rockket’, Buxus m
microphylla ‘Wintergem
m’,
and Hydrrangea arborescens ‘Inccrediball’. All
A species w
were dormantt and were inn 4” pot/trayys at
time of application.
a
The trial waas set up in a minimum hheat hoop hoouse with tem
mperatures
around 45-50 °F and high humid
dity. Treatmeents were reeapplied 8 W
WAT on 25 A
April 2013.
Evaluatio
ons consisted
d of visual raatings of botth weed conttrol and phyytotoxicity too crop speciees.
Visual raatings of liveerwort contro
ol were baseed on a 0-10 scale with 0 being no coontrol and 100
perfect co
ontrol with ≥7
≥ commerccially acceptaable. Visuall ratings of pphytotoxicityy were basedd on
a scale off 0-10 with 0 being no phytotoxicity
y and 10 deatth with ≤3 commerciallyy acceptable.
Trials weere set up in a completely
y randomizeed design forr each speciees.
Fig. 4 SurreGuard dam
mage on Hyddrangea
after the seecond appliccation at Deccker’s
Nursery.
20131202c.pdf
IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program
Research Report Cover Sheet
Trial: 2013 OH
Researcher(s) Hannah Mathers
Ohio State University
Affiliation:
248C Howlett Hall, 2001 Fyffe Ct
Columbus
OH
PhoneNumber: (614) 247-6195
mathers.7@osu.edu
Email:
30918
30936
19338
30140
30147
43210-1096
Phytotoxicity
Lilyturf, Creeping
SureGuard 51WDG
59639-120
Phytotoxicity
Liriope sp.
Flumioxazin
Valent
Phytotoxicity
Spruce
SureGuard 51WDG
59639-120
Phytotoxicity
Picea sp.
Flumioxazin
Valent
Phytotoxicity
Lilac
SureGuard 51WDG
59639-120
Phytotoxicity
Syringa sp.
Flumioxazin
Valent
Phytotoxicity
Lilac
SureGuard 51WDG
59639-120
Phytotoxicity
Syringa sp.
Flumioxazin
Valent
Phytotoxicity
Phytotoxicity
Arrowwood
Viburnum sp.
SureGuard 51WDG
Flumioxazin
59639-120
Valent
Greenhouse
C
Greenhouse
C
Field Container
C
Greenhouse
C
Greenhouse
C